Cigarette filter assemblies may comprise sorbent materials, such as carbon. Filters adapted to be incorporated in a filter cigarette, may comprise, for example, particles or granules of carbon, such as activated carbon or activated charcoal and/or other sorbent materials, incorporated within porous media material, such as cellulose acetate tow, or in cavities between the porous media material.
To the extent that sorbent particles or fragments of sorbent particles could possibly be entrained in the gas stream, such as mainstream smoke, passing through the filter and issue through (i.e., breakthrough) the outlet end of the filter such as the mouth end of a cigarette, techniques to reduce the amount of sorbent particle breakthrough in the gas stream would be of interest.
An exemplary embodiment of a method of making a smoking article filter assembly is provided in which one or more fibers of charge retaining polymer are formed into a lofty porous network. The lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers is surrounded with a filter wrap to form a filter rod. The one or more fibers of charge retaining polymer are charged.
An exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for manufacturing a filter assembly for a smoking article is provided which comprises a source of lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers to form into a filter rod having a suitable pressure drop. The apparatus includes first and second rollers having protrusions and/or grooves to move the lofty porous network between faces of rollers at high speed without crushing the lofty porous network to a plug wrapping unit which surrounds the lofty porous network with a plug wrap to form the filter rod, and a charging unit to impart an electrostatic charge to the charge retaining polymer fibers before or after the rollers or the plug wrapping unit.
As used herein, “fiber” refers to one or more fibers and the “upstream” and “downstream” relative positions between filter segments and other features are described in relation to the direction of gas flow as the gas is filtered in a smoking article. For example, mainstream smoke as it is drawn from the tobacco rod and through a multi-component filter, moves downstream.
As used herein, the term “entrainable particles” describes beads, granules, dust, fines, powders and the like having a diameter of about 0.1 micron to about 10 microns, which may become entrained in a gas stream. For example, smoke entrainable particles, such as carbon or other sorbent material, may become entrained in mainstream smoke.
Plug-space-plug filters may include a portion of activated carbon between plugs of axially oriented cellulose acetate fibers. As smoke is drawn downstream from the tobacco rod and through the filter, some carbon particles may pass through channels between the individual cellulose acetate fibers. The plug-space-plug filter is typically attached to the tobacco rod that is wrapped with a paper wrapper to form a smoking article. Tipping paper surrounds the filter and affixes the filter to the tobacco rod.
As described herein, a filter assembly for a smoking article produces potentially reduced and/or eliminated particle breakthrough during smoking by using an electrostatic charge to attract particles and optionally also a random orientation of electrostatically charged fibers to mechanically trap particles. “Random orientation” describes portions of the electrostatically charged fibers running more or less at random in non-parallel diverging and converging directions. Optionally, electrostatically charged fibers can be randomly oriented primarily in a longitudinal direction of the filter, primarily in a transverse direction, or primarily in another direction.
In a preferred embodiment charge retaining polymer fibers are combined in a porous network having a predetermined loft and the polymer fibers are electrostatically charged. “Loft” describes a woven or non-woven network of charge retaining polymer fibers incorporating a high percentage of airspace between the fibers giving the lofty porous network a low density. Generally, a network lacking in loft or significant thickness has charge retaining polymer fibers comprising the non-lofty porous network oriented substantially in the X-Y plane of the non-lofty porous network. Adding a true Z-direction orientation to the charge retaining polymer fibers outside of the plane of the network forms a lofty porous network. Preferably, the airspace in the lofty porous network is about 20-95% by volume (e.g., about 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, 80-95%). More preferably, the airspace is about 60-80% by volume (e.g., about 60-65%, 65-70%, 70-75%, 75-80%). For example, a sheet of lofty porous network will have a greater thickness than a sheet of non-lofty porous network for the same weight (denier) of fiber and sheet size. Preferably the porosity and loft of the lofty porous network are adapted to achieve a suitable pressure drop across the portion of the filter assembly formed of the lofty porous network. A suitable pressure drop for a filter assembly is in a range of 90 to 180 mm H2O at a flow rate of 17.5 cm3/s. “Pressure drop” is the pressure required to draw air through a filter rod at a constant flow rate of 17.5 cm3/s. Pressure drop is also referred to as “draft” or “resistance to draw.”
In a preferred embodiment, the sorbent is activated carbon. Preferably, the lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers is located downstream of the activated carbon contained within the filter assembly so that as gas (e.g., smoke) is drawn through the filter assembly the carbon particles, having a size of about 0.1 micron to about 10 microns, entrained in the gas are retained by the electrostatically charged fibers of the porous network.
In a preferred embodiment, illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, the filter assembly 10 is a lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers 14 and mediating filter fibers 32, as shown in
In a preferred embodiment, illustrated in
The charge retaining polymer fibers in the lofty porous network 14 can be charged at any time, however, charging the fibers after forming the fibers into a network is preferred because charged fibers and/or portions of a fiber not formed into a network tend to repel one another. Charging the charge retaining polymer fibers can be accomplished by such techniques as tribo-electrification charging, corona charging, electron beam charging, ion beam charging, radiation charging, and/or boundary charging. For example, commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,919,105, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes batch charging a sample mat of fibers. Preferably, the charge retaining polymer is a polyethylene, a polypropylene, polyvinylidene difluoride, polytetrafluoroethylene, nylon, polyesters, polyamides or combinations thereof. The charge retaining polymer fibers are positively charged, negatively charged or both positively and negatively charged, depending on the process(es) used for charging.
In a preferred embodiment, the charge retaining fibers include electret fibers (e.g., 3M Filtrete™ fiber). Preferably, electret fibers have a diameter of about 3 micrometers to about 30 micrometers and a basis weight in the range of about 10 to about 500 g/m2. Preferably, the electret fibers range in weight from about 2.5 denier to about 8 denier. Preferred fibers have a Y-shaped cross-section.
Also preferably, the filter assembly includes about 30 mg to about 200 mg of sorbent. In a preferred embodiment, the filter assembly 10 also includes about 25 mg to about 75 mg of lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers 14, which forms a plug of about 3 mm to about 6 mm in length. Preferably, the amount of lofty porous network 14 used depends on the amount of sorbent, such as activated carbon, contained within the filter assembly 10. In a preferred embodiment, a plug of lofty porous network 14 having a plug length of at least 1 mm (e.g., at least 2 mm, 3 mm or 4 mm) is used for about 18 mg of activated carbon.
In a preferred embodiment, the sorbent and/or smoke entrainable particles include any suitable sorbent media. Exemplary sorbents include molecular sieves such as zeolites, silicas, silcates, aluminas, and/or carbons (e.g., activated carbon). A preferred sorbent media is activated carbon.
By “activated carbon” is meant any porous, high surface area form of carbon that can be used as a sorbent in filters. Activated carbon can be derived via thermal treatment of any suitable carbon source. The activation treatment typically increases the porosity, and activated carbon can be provided with a wide range of pore sizes or the pore sizes can be controlled to provide a desired pore size distribution.
In a preferred embodiment, the carbon is in the form of granules and the like. Preferably, the carbon of the preferred embodiment is a high surface area, activated carbon, for example a coconut shell based carbon of typical ASTM mesh size used in the cigarette industry or finer. A particularly preferred activated carbon is commercially available from PICA USA, Inc., Truth or Consequences, N. Mex. The activated carbon could also be manufactured via the carbonization of coal, wood, pitch, peat, cellulose fibers, lignite and olive pits. Carbonization is usually carried out at elevated temperatures, e.g., 400-1000° C. in an inert atmosphere, followed by activation under reducing or oxidizing conditions.
In a preferred embodiment, the activated carbon can be in the form of beads. In other embodiments, the activated carbon can be in the form of granules and/or fibers. Preferably, the activated carbon is adapted to adsorb constituents of mainstream smoke, particularly, those of the gas phase including aldehydes, ketones and other volatile organic compounds, and in particular 1,3-butadiene, acrolein, isoprene, propionaldehyde, acrylonitrile, benzene, toluene, styrene, acetaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
In other embodiments, the carbon can be in the form of carbon on tow and/or carbon paper.
Most preferably, the activated carbon comprises granulated particles ranging in size from about 100 microns to about 5 mm. In an embodiment, the particles of activated carbon have an average size of from about 0.2 to 2 mm (e.g., about 200, 500, 1000 or 2000 microns). Activated carbon beads contained in the filter assembly preferably range in size from 0.20 mm to about 0.7 mm, as described in commonly-assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0154993, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Preferably, activated carbon can have any desired pore size distribution that comprises pores, such as micropores, mesopores and macropores. The term “microporous” generally refers to such materials having pore sizes of about 20 Angstroms or less while the term “mesoporous” generally refers to such materials with pore sizes of about 20-300 Angstroms. “Macroporous” generally refers to such materials with pore sizes greater than about 300 Angstroms.
In an embodiment, the activated carbon can be selected to have an appropriate surface area to preferentially adsorb targeted constituents from smoke. For example, the preferred activated carbon typically has a surface area greater than about 50 m2/g (e.g., at least about 100, 200, 500, 1000 or 2000 m2/g). Typically, the adsorptive capacity of the activated carbon increases with increasing surface area.
Furthermore, surface area to volume typically increases with decreasing particle size. When used as cigarette filter material, however, carbon particles having a small particle size may pack together too densely to permit smoke to flow through the filter with desired resistance to draw (RTD) during smoking. On the other hand, if the particle size is too large there may be insufficient surface area to accomplish the desired degree of filtration. Therefore, such factors can be taken into account in selecting carbon particles suitable for filtration of mainstream and/or sidestream smoke.
Optionally, at least some, if not all of the activated carbon is flavor-bearing or otherwise impregnated with a flavorant so that the carbon is adapted not only to remove one or more gas phase smoke constituents from smoke, but also to release flavor into the mainstream smoke stream. Preferably, the flavorant is added to the carbon by spraying flavorant upon a batch of activated carbon in a mixing (tumbling) drum, or alternatively in a fluidized bed with nitrogen as the fluidizing agent, wherein flavorant may then be sprayed onto the carbon in the bed as described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,761,174 to Jupe et al., the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The term “mainstream” smoke refers to the mixture of gases passing down the tobacco rod and issuing through the filter end, i.e., the amount of smoke issuing or drawn from the mouth end of a smoking article such as a cigarette during smoking of the cigarette. The mainstream smoke contains smoke that is drawn in through both the lighted region, as well as through the cigarette paper wrapper. The term “side stream” smoke refers to smoke produced during static burning.
As seen in
In a preferred embodiment, the filter assembly 10 contains about 40 mg to about 70 mg of cellulose acetate fibers. Preferably, one or more plugs of cellulose acetate fibers are added to adjust the length of the filter.
If carbon particles become entrained in the mainstream smoke, the electrostatically charged fibers attract and capture the carbon particles to reduce carbon particle breakthrough. Preferably, the electrostatically charged fibers have permanent electrostatic charges so that the carbon particles are captured in the filter.
In an embodiment, when the charge retaining polymer fibers are randomly oriented, carbon particles are also captured mechanically because the carbon particles are not able to travel unimpeded in channels between the fibers.
In another embodiment, as illustrated in
In yet another embodiment, as illustrated in
As seen in
As used herein, the term “smoking article” includes cigarettes, cigars, pipes, and cigarillos. Non-traditional cigarettes such as cigarettes for electrical smoking systems, as described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,163,015; 6,615,840; 6,026,820; 5,988,176; 5,915,387; and 5,499,636, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference, are also included in the definition of smoking articles or cigarettes generally.
Preferably, the smoking article is a cigarette. The cigarette may contain tobacco material and a filter. In an embodiment, the cigarette may also contain at least one sorbent 12. A traditional cigarette typically contains two sections, a tobacco-containing portion sometimes referred to as the tobacco rod 60, and a filter portion 10 which may be referred to as the filtration zone. Tipping paper 65 typically surrounds the filter 10, which forms the buccal end of the cigarette. The tipping paper 65 overlaps with the tobacco rod 60 in order to hold the filter assembly 10 and tobacco rod 60 together. The tobacco rod 60, or tobacco containing element of the cigarette includes the paper wrapper 70 in which the tobacco is wrapped and the adhesive holding the seams of the paper wrapper 70 together. The tobacco rod 60 has a first end which is integrally attached to the filter assembly 10 and a second end which is lit or heated for smoking the tobacco.
As previously mentioned, the lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers can be formed from a charge retaining polymer by thermally, mechanically or chemically bonding a continuous fiber filament or a bundle of fibers with or without mediating filter fibers and with or without plasticizers into a woven or non-woven mat. In an embodiment, the filter assembly for a smoking article can be made by crimping such a mat to form a tow band and then processing the tow band in a filter making apparatus where a filter wrap is put on the tow band to form a filter rod. In an alternative embodiment, the fiber or bundle of fibers can be processed into continuous woven or non-woven media with or without the mediating filter fibers, then slit into a desired width to replace tow bands in a filter rod-forming unit, such as a KDF filter rod-forming machine manufactured by Hauni, or punched into cylindrical disks with desired diameters and depths to serve as sections supplied directly to a cigarette filter combiner, such as a ND-3 filter combiner machine manufactured by Hauni. The cylindrical disks serve as sections in a cigarette filter.
In another embodiment of a process of making the filter rods, the crimped tow bands, bundles of the fibers, or the slit continuous woven or non-woven media of the charge retaining polymer fiber is pulled into a preformed cylindered filter wrap tube, and then cut to filter rods with desired lengths. Electrostatic charge on the charge retaining polymer fiber can be introduced on the fiber filament, the fiber bundles, the formed tow bands, the woven or non-woven media or the formed filter rods during the process. For example, an approximately 2.0-cm wide slit (e.g., 1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 2.2, 2.5 or 2.7 cm wide slit) of charged non-woven media made of polypropylene and polyester (Toyobo Elitolon Electret Media) can be folded and pulled through a pre-formed cylindrical filter wrapping tube with a hook. A tool can be threaded through the cylindrical filter wrapping tube to hook the lofty porous network and drawing the tool through the cylindrical tube, move the lofty porous network into the cylindrical tube filling the cylindrical tube with the lofty porous network, followed by detaching the tool.
The formed cylinder filled with lofty porous network can be trim cut into an about 3-9 mm (e.g., about 6 mm) long, about 5-10 mm (e.g., about 7.5 mm) in diameter filter sections (weight 60-70 mg). Such sections can be combined with other filter components to form a filter assembly containing about 50-150 mg (e.g., about 110 mg) of granular carbon.
Also provided is a method of making a filter assembly including filling a cavity of a plug-space-plug filter assembly with sorbent, such as activated carbon particles, wherein a plug of lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers is located downstream of the cavity. In an embodiment, the plug of lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers is located immediately downstream of the activated carbon (see, e.g.,
In a preferred embodiment, a plug of axially oriented cellulose acetate fibers is placed upstream of the activated carbon. In another preferred embodiment, a plug of axially oriented cellulose acetate fibers is placed upstream and downstream of the plug of lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers, or of the activated carbon.
“2-up plugs of filter material” refers to a plug construction such that if it were divided into two pieces, would render two complete plugs of filter material. Similarly, a “4-up filter assembly” would, if separated into four pieces, provide four complete filter assemblies each comprising upstream and downstream plugs of filter material with a plug including the lofty porous network and a cavity having sorbent between the upstream and downstream plugs of filter material as described in connection with the filter assembly of the preferred embodiments.
In a preferred embodiment, a method is provided for forming smoking articles. Preferably, 2-up plugs of filter material are spaced apart to form 4-up filter assemblies and plugs including the lofty porous network are placed between the 2-up plugs such that cavities are formed at upstream and downstream ends of every other 2-up plug. Sorbent including smoke entrainable sorbent particles are preferably placed in the cavities and the 4-up filter assemblies are cut centrally to form 2-up filter assemblies. Preferably, a tobacco rod is attached to each end of the 2-up filter assemblies and the 2-up filter assemblies are centrally cut to form complete cigarettes.
Also provided is an apparatus 200 adapted to form a tubular filter including a lofty porous network of charge retaining polymer fibers. As illustrated in
In the embodiment shown in
It will be understood that the foregoing description is of the preferred embodiments, and is, therefore, merely representative of the article and methods of manufacturing the same. It can be appreciated that variations and modifications of the different embodiments in light of the above teachings will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the articles and methods as set forth in the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2479930 | Herkenhoff et al. | Aug 1949 | A |
2805671 | Darkis | Sep 1957 | A |
2916038 | Wade | Dec 1959 | A |
3111702 | Berger et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3313306 | Berger et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3339560 | Kiefer et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3575179 | Troll et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648711 | Berger et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3656484 | Roberts et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3757803 | Chiang | Sep 1973 | A |
3809097 | Clayton et al. | May 1974 | A |
3826177 | Berger et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3882877 | Brackmann et al. | May 1975 | A |
3943832 | Sexstone | Mar 1976 | A |
4032688 | Pall | Jun 1977 | A |
4059121 | Brackmann et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4174720 | Hall | Nov 1979 | A |
4197863 | Clayton et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4215682 | Kubik et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4258730 | Tsukamoto | Mar 1981 | A |
4260523 | Tsukamoto | Apr 1981 | A |
4390031 | Berger | Jun 1983 | A |
4486365 | Kliemann et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4507107 | Berger | Mar 1985 | A |
4528050 | Arther et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4540625 | Sherwood | Sep 1985 | A |
RE32171 | Van Turnhout | Jun 1986 | E |
4592815 | Nakao | Jun 1986 | A |
4593706 | Preston et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4930526 | Chen et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5044381 | Thomas | Sep 1991 | A |
5143098 | Rogers et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5191905 | Tsukamoto | Mar 1993 | A |
5271419 | Arzonico et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5296061 | Ando et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5322075 | Deevi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5350443 | von Blucher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5429848 | Ando et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5465739 | Perfetti et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5468529 | Kwon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5497793 | Kubica | Mar 1996 | A |
5499636 | Baggett, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5509430 | Berger | Apr 1996 | A |
5531235 | Hassenboehler, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5591368 | Fleischhauer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607766 | Berger | Mar 1997 | A |
5620641 | Berger | Apr 1997 | A |
5633082 | Berger | May 1997 | A |
5678577 | Matsumura et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690126 | Matsumura et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692527 | Matsumura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709227 | Arzonico et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5758669 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5804296 | Itoh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817159 | Cahill et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823201 | Matsumura | Oct 1998 | A |
5856006 | Asai et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863652 | Matsumura et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5874373 | Pryne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5911224 | Berger | Jun 1999 | A |
5913311 | Ito | Jun 1999 | A |
5915387 | Baggett, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927287 | Matsumura | Jul 1999 | A |
5934289 | Watkins et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947126 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951744 | Rohrbach et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954059 | Beven et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970988 | Buchanan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979460 | Matsumura | Nov 1999 | A |
5988176 | Baggett et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998500 | Cahill et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026820 | Baggett, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6048614 | Rohrbach et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053176 | Adams et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6119691 | Angadjivand et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133439 | Buchanan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6202650 | Kaneki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230901 | Ogata et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6344239 | Asai et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6432872 | Tsushio et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6514325 | Cox et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521321 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6571802 | Yamashita | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584979 | Xue et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6615843 | Pera | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6616723 | Berger | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623854 | Bond | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6739344 | Yamashita | May 2004 | B2 |
6759356 | Myers | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6761174 | Jupe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6776168 | Teufel et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789547 | Paine, III | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6814786 | Zhuang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6837281 | Spiers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6907885 | Xue et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913784 | Xue et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919105 | Xue et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
RE38773 | Mark et al. | Aug 2005 | E |
6946506 | Bond et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6971387 | Michaels | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7011096 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7152609 | Li et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165553 | Luan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7247237 | Mori et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020020420 | Xue et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030118781 | Insley et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030154993 | Paine, III et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159703 | Yang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030183237 | Xue et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200973 | Xue et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040045566 | Pera | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040131770 | Xue et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147397 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177855 | Garthaffner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194792 | Zhuang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040250825 | Deevi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040250827 | Deevi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000531 | Shi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050126481 | Xue et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060130861 | Luan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144410 | Luan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070012327 | Karles | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080314400 | Yang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090075798 | Garthaffner | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100006112 | Yang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 084 626 | Jun 1960 | DE |
1243072 | Jun 1967 | DE |
3439907 | Apr 1986 | DE |
9309937 | Aug 1993 | DE |
0 654 224 | May 1995 | EP |
0 715 816 | Jun 1996 | EP |
1084631 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1354522 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2089766 | Jan 1972 | FR |
2290166 | Jun 1976 | FR |
1137870 | Dec 1968 | GB |
WO 9407383 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO02069745 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO2004014162 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004089124 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005102080 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2007078197 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 30, 2008 for PCT/IB2007/002237. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 30, 2008 for PCT/IB2007/002150. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Dec. 1, 2009 for PCT/IB2008/001842. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 13, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/EP2010/006107. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial International Search Report mailed Mar. 24, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/EP2010/006107. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 4, 2009 for PCT/EP2008/011108. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 4, 2008 for PCT/IB2007/002237. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 10, 2008 for PCT/IB2007/002150. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Apr. 11, 2012 for PCT/EP2010/006107. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Jun. 22, 2010 for PCT/EP2008/011108. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 11, 2008 for PCT/IB2008/001842. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130331247 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12576948 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13969904 | US |