The technical field relates generally to a repeater for a wireless communication network, and, more particularly, to a repeater configuration for reducing oscillations among two or more repeaters or repeater sections.
Conventionally, the coverage area of a wireless communication network such as, for example, a Time Division Duplex (TDD), Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi), Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (Wi-max), Cellular, Global System for Mobile communications (GSM), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), or 3G based wireless network can be increased by a repeater. Exemplary repeaters include, for example, frequency translating repeaters or same frequency repeaters which operate in the physical layer or data link layer as defined by the Open Systems Interconnection Basic Reference Model (OSI Model).
Repeaters are also used to satisfy the increasing need to extend the range of nodes such as access points associated with wireless networks, including but not limited to wireless local area networks (WLANs) and wireless metropolitan area networks (WMANs) described and specified in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11, 802.16 and 802.20 standards due to the increasing popularity of unrestrained access to broadband services by, for example, portable computing devices. The effective proliferation of wireless networks depends heavily on sustaining and increasing performance levels as user demands increase.
However, when multiple repeaters occupy the same radio frequency environment, problems, such as, oscillation between repeaters can arise. Oscillations can lead to a host of problems such as distortion, saturation, loss of synchronization, and data or information loss.
Further, the problem of “scalability” of many closely located repeaters must be addressed. For instance, when repeaters are deployed in close proximity in a multi-tenant dwelling, an effective coverage area may become so large as to cause a “flooding” of packets. While the coverage area has been greatly enhanced, there may be inefficiency due to limited capacity for a large number of users.
Therefore, there is a need for low cost and low risk solutions to such oscillation problems. Preferably, the solution will be extendible to allow for more capability than simply preventing multi-repeater oscillation.
In view of the above problems, a repeater operating in a wireless network according to various embodiments mitigates oscillation so that it will substantially not repeat a signal from another repeater in the wireless network in an oscillating state. The wireless network can include a second repeater capable of communicating with the first repeater, and first and second wireless station devices such as an access point and a wireless computing device capable of communicating with at least one of the first repeater and the second repeater.
According to various embodiments, the repeater includes a reception device for receiving a wireless signal at a reception frequency; a detector for detecting if a predetermined portion of the received wireless signal includes a modified portion to thereby determine that the received signal is from the second repeater; and a transmission device for transmitting the wireless signal to one of the first and second wireless station devices at a transmission frequency to thereby repeat the wireless signal.
If the predetermined portion of the received wireless signal includes the modified portion, the transmission device can be configured to not repeat a substantial portion of the wireless signal, to transmit the wireless signal at a frequency different from the transmission frequency, or transmit the wireless signal at a power level different from an original transmission power level.
The repeater can further include a signal modification device for modifying the wireless signal. The signal modification device can be, for example, a notch processor configured to insert a notch pattern on the wireless signal to be transmitted and to detect a notch pattern inserted on a wireless signal as the modified portion.
The signal modification device can also be, for example, a bi-phase modulation device configured to modulate a phase of the predetermined portion of the wireless signal. The bi-phase modulator can modulate the predetermined portion of the wireless signal to have a unique signature recognizable by the second repeater upon receiving the modified wireless signal. A surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter can be coupled to the output of the bi-phase modulator to remove spectral splattering from the modified wireless signal. A timing circuit can also be coupled to the bi-phase modulator for controlling an amount of time during which the bi-phase modulator modulates the phase of the predetermined portion of the wireless signal.
The bi-phase modulator can includes a transfer switch coupled to an input of a linear oscillator (LO), the transfer switch switching positive and negative inputs of the LO at a predetermined frequency to modulate the phase of the predetermined portion of the wireless signal.
The repeater can further include a de-modification device such as a demodulation device for removing the modified portion from the predetermined portion of the wireless signal.
The transmission device is configured to transmit or not transmit the wireless signal if the predetermined portion of the received wireless signal includes the modified portion.
The predetermined portion of the received wireless signal can be a preamble of the wireless signal and the modified portion can be a predetermined phase variation.
The detector can further be configured to detect if the wireless signal was transmitted from one of the first and second wireless station devices by performing a qualifying detection process on the received wireless signal. The qualifying detection process can include correlating a preamble of the received wireless signal to a predetermined signal pattern or demodulating one of a predetermined information sequence, a pilot channel and a pilot carrier.
The repeater can be one of a frequency translating repeater in which the reception frequency and transmission frequency are different, and a same frequency repeater in which the reception frequency and transmission frequency are same.
The repeater can also include a processor and a memory coupled to the processor. A power adjustment routine for configuring the CPU can be stored in the memory. The processor can be configured to: generate probe packets to be transmitted to the second repeater at the transmission frequency; measure a received signal strength indication (RSSI) of a packet received in response to the probe packets; determine if a path loss defined by a difference between a power level at which the probe packets were transmitted and the measured RSSI is less than a predetermined value; and mark the transmission frequency as unavailable for use if the path loss is less than the predetermined value.
The processor can further be configured to: generate a group of packets to be transmitted to the second repeater at the transmission frequency if the path loss is not less than approximately 80 dB; determine an average RSSI for the group of packets; and if the average RSSI is less than a predetermined level, mark a current transmission power as acceptable.
The processor can further be configured to: adjust the current transmission power downward by a predetermined decibel level if the average RSSI is less not than the predetermined level; regenerate the group of packets to be transmitted to the second repeater at the transmission frequency; determine an average RSSI for the group of packets; and if the average RSSI is less than a predetermined level, mark a current transmission power as acceptable.
Additional detection capability included in the repeaters can enable detection of the preamble with the phase modulated sequence and additional communications. For instance, it may be desired that packets from some repeaters may be re-repeated, while those from other repeaters are not repeated. Another example would be that only packets with a specific signature are allowed to be repeated and all others are filtered off. Other actions may include placing packets with a unique signature on a unique repeated frequency, and as such the signature may act as an addressing function, a quality of service code, or a priority code.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views and which together with the detailed description below are incorporated in and form part of the specification, serve to further illustrate various embodiments and to explain various principles and advantages in accordance with the present invention.
In overview, the present disclosure concerns a repeater configuration for mitigating oscillation. The instant disclosure is provided to further explain in an enabling fashion the best modes of performing one or more embodiments of the present invention. The use of relational terms such as first and second, and the like, if any, are used solely to distinguish one from another entity, item, or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities, items or actions. It is noted that some embodiments may include a plurality of processes or steps, which can be performed in any order, unless expressly and necessarily limited to a particular order; i.e., processes or steps that are not so limited may be performed in any order.
Much of the inventive functionality and many of the inventive principles when implemented, are best supported with or in computer instructions (software) or integrated circuits (ICs), and/or application specific ICs. It is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions or ICs with minimal experimentation. Therefore, in the interest of brevity and minimization of any risk of obscuring the principles and concepts according to the present invention, further discussion of such software and ICs, if any, will be limited to the essentials with respect to the principles and concepts used by the exemplary embodiments.
Referring now to
While the signal carried over RF path 102 is of sufficient strength to maintain high-speed data packet communications between the client unit 104 and the wireless gateway 100, the signals carried over the RF path 103 and intended for the client unit 105 would be attenuated when passing through a structural barrier such as walls 106 or 107 to a point where few, if any, data packets are received in either direction if not for wireless repeaters 200, 204.
To enhance the coverage and/or communication data rate to the client unit 105, wireless repeaters 200, 204 receive packets transmitted on an initial frequency channel 201 from the wireless gateway 100, access point or another repeater. The wireless repeater 200 detects the presence of a packet on the first frequency channel 201 and receives the packet and re-transmits the packet with more power on a second frequency channel 202. Similarly, the wireless repeater 204 detects the presence of the packet on the second frequency channel 202, receives the packet and re-transmits the packet with more power on a third frequency channel 203. Unlike conventional WLAN operating protocols, the client unit 105 operates on the third frequency channel, even though the wireless gateway 100 operates on the first frequency channel 203. To perform the return packet operation, the wireless repeater 204 detects the presence of a transmitted packet on the third frequency channel 203 from the client unit 105, receives the packet on the third frequency channel 203, and re-transmits the packet on the second frequency channel 202. The wireless repeater 200 detects the presence of a transmitted packet on the second frequency channel 202 from wireless repeater 204, receives the packet on the second frequency channel 202, and re-transmits the packet on the first frequency channel 201. The wireless gateway 100 then receives the packet on the first frequency channel 201. In this way, the wireless repeaters 200, 204 are capable of simultaneously receiving and transmitting signals as well as extending the coverage and performance of the wireless gateway 100 to the client unit 105. When many units are isolated from one another, the repeaters 200, 204 can further act as a wireless bridge allowing two different groups of units to communicate where optimum RF propagation and coverage or, in many cases, any RF propagation and coverage was not previously possible.
However, as described herein above, repeater systems using frequency translation may encounter problems, for example, when beacon signals are used. Accordingly, range extension may be realized in such systems using repeaters for wireless local area networks and may be particularly advantageous when specific protocols are used, such as, for example, the 802.11 series of protocols by modifying the beacon signal to reflect the frequency translation. As noted however problems arise when adjacent nodes using or re-using translated frequencies within range of each other may establish false connections which lead to problems from node to node in terms of data traffic integrity. False connections may also lead to repeater to repeater oscillations when both repeaters are using the same frequency pairs and may further lead to system problems causing a general failure in the WLAN environment. The problems also arise on same frequency repeaters.
Wireless repeaters 200, 204 convert packets from an initial frequency channel to a different frequency channel, where it may be received by one or more clients, such as station devices (STA) or client units 104 or 105, or a different repeater. Client units 104 or 105 preferably receive a beacon identifying an 802.11b channel as being the appropriate channel for communication, and would receive information packets translated by the repeater 200, 204 from a first channel to a second channel.
A problematic repeater condition may arise however, in exemplary scenario 300, as illustrated
Referring to
The output of the comparator 1823 is fed to a sequencer 1826 (CMP_A_EN terminal). The comparator 1823 can output a signal indicative of a detected signal when the RSSI is greater than the predetermined threshold, thus indicative of a signal to be repeated. In response to the signal from the comparator 1823, as well as other indications, the sequencer 1826 will output an enable signal (not shown) to the demodulator 1824 to begin demodulating the signal as well as various control outputs that will begin the physical repeating of the signal. Subsequently, the sequencer 1826 will also output a signal to an AND gate 1828. The AND gate 1828 also receives a microprocessor enable signal from the processor 1825, and outputs an enable signal to timing circuitry 1830 if the enable signals are received from both the sequencer 1826 and the processor 1825. The timing circuitry 1830 controls a bi-phase modulator (signal modification device) 1832, which receives the output signal from the AGC element 1822 via an amplifier 1834 and additional circuitry. An exemplary circuit for the timing circuitry 1830 is shown in
The bi-phase modulator 1832 modifies the signal by adding an amount of phase variation to modulate, for example, the first few symbols of a packet to be repeated. The bi-phase modulator 1832 can include, for example, transfer switches for switching the differential signal received from the amplifier 1834 to thereby add the phase variation. An exemplary circuit for the bi-phase modulator 1832 is shown in
The output of the bi-phase modulator 1832 is fed to a SAW filter 1836 for removing any spectral splattering created by the phase modulation performed by the bi-phase modulator 1832. The signal can then be transmitted by one of the first or second antennas ANTA, ANTB via the mixer 1838 and additional analog elements to an access point, wireless station or client device (wireless station).
Referring to
During repeater operation, when the repeater 1800 is placed in the standard operating mode of WLAN only, the digital demodulator 1824 (DSSS/OFDM detector) will not recognize packets having symbols phase modulated by another repeater as valid WLAN packets, thereby stopping the repeating process because the existing phase relationships are disrupted by the signal modification. Therefore, when the repeater 1800 receives a repeated signal from a similar repeater 1800, it will not re-repeat the signal. As a result, the problem related to oscillation as discussed above can be mitigated.
Further, the phase variation added to the signal by the bi-phase modulator 1832 is transparent to wireless stations receiving the modified signal because carrier recovery is not performed until, for example, the fifth or sixth symbol of an incoming stream.
In an alternative embodiment, an external phase modulator can advantageously be placed after the amplifier 1834. In addition, a simple timer to control the 5.5 MHz clock can be generated by dividing down an existing clock such as an 11 MHz processor clock. Further, the signal modification can be performed at the output of the mixer 1838 rather than the amplifier. However, the output of amplifier 1834 is preferably used because of the difficulty accessing the data stream coming out of the modulator in order to add the phase at base-band for signals coming out of the modulator. Accordingly, the phase modulator 1832 is triggered by either a comparator hit or anytime a modulated signal is generated. It should be noted that the signal modified may be a self-generated signal or a received signal.
Returning to the exemplary scenario 300 illustrated in
A further advantage of the repeater according to the various embodiments is that limited or no additional analog, digital or I/O circuitry is needed for phase detection because such phase detection is performed by the existing circuitry for the OFDM/DSSS digital modulator. The circuitry for generating the phase modulation is extremely simple.
Accordingly, if an amount of phase variation is deliberately modulated onto the first few symbols of a repeated packet and the standard operating mode of “WLAN only” is enabled, the existing DSSS and OFDM detector will not recognize the packets associated with the phase modulated symbols as valid WLAN packets and will stop the repeating process.
The biphase modulator 1832 can be modified to perform the phase modulation of the preamble so that each packet has a unique signature. This signature may be a unique phase modulating “square wave” with a unique frequency of a set of frequencies or one of a set of orthogonal codes such as Walsh codes or the like. While it is not required that the code be orthogonal, orthogonal orientation between the codes is considered to allow for a higher performance of the detection of the one out of the set of codes with more certainty. Examples of non-orthogonal code would be ones with low cross correlations such as PN codes, Gold codes, or Barker sequences. Use of such codes as the modulation sequence by the repeater onto the preamble of the repeated packet will allow for (as previously mentioned) preventing the “wireless LAN only” detection of the signal to be prevented in a similar manner to the tests discussed below.
Further, the unique signature can be configured so that operation of a repeater receiving the modified signal is adjusted in accordance with the unique signature. For example, rather than the repeater not repeating the signal when it includes the phase modulated preamble, the repeater can be configured to take alternative actions such as transmitting the wireless signal at a frequency different from an original transmission frequency, or transmitting the wireless signal at a power level different from the original transmission power level in order to avoid oscillation. Also, the repeater could be configured to remove the unique signature from the signal. The repeater can be configured to perform such actions in accordance with the processor 1825 executing instructions stored in an associated memory.
Further, the repeater can use the phase modulation in the signal to perform a qualifying detection process to determine if the received wireless signal is from another repeater or one of the wireless stations. Particularly, the phase modulation can be correlated to predetermined signal pattern stored in the memory. If the correlation is determined to be high, then the repeater can determine that the wireless signal is from another repeater and take appropriate action to prevent oscillation. Alternatively, the qualifying detection process can include demodulating one of a predetermined information sequence, a pilot channel and a pilot carrier.
Various tests were performed on an exemplary repeater which validated the conclusions discussed above. In the tests, the search time for WLAN detection in an exemplary repeater was programmable from 4 μs to 16 μs. A digital signal was generated using a Vector Signal Generator (VSG) having phase modulation on the first 4 μs for both an OFDM signal and a DSSS signal. As discussed below, cessation of repeating was achieved 100% of the time for a programmed search time of 4 μs.
Next, the operating mode of the exemplary repeater was changed to “WLAN only” OFF. The signal successfully transited the repeater 100% of the time and a Vector Signal Analyzer (VSA) successfully demodulated the repeated signal including the phase modulation. As a control, the signal was input with the phase modulation imposed directly from the VSG and, when output to the VSA, the signal with the direct modulation was again successfully demodulated.
TIME DOMAIN OPERATION: Referring to
In “Test #1_DSSS,” a 1 Mbps DSSS signal was injected without any phase modulation into the exemplary repeater while WLAN Only was enabled and the output was measured. As shown in
In “Test #2_DSSS,” a 1 Mbps DSSS signal with Bi-Phase Modulation added to the first 4 μs of the signal was injected into the exemplary repeater while WLAN Only was enabled and the output was measured. The repeater in WLAN Only mode is set to search 4 μs for an 802.11g DSSS or OFDM packet. As shown in
In “Test #3_DSSS,” a 1 Mbps DSSS signal with Bi-Phase Modulation added to the first 4 μs of the signal was injected into the exemplary repeater while WLAN Only disabled and the output was measured. As shown in
In “Test #3_DSSS Zoom” a zoomed version of Test #3_DSSS was performed in which the phase was added across the first 4 μs. As shown in
Referring to
In “Test #1_OFDM,” a 6 Mbps OFDM signal without any phase modulation was injected into the exemplary repeater with WLAN Only enabled and the output was measured. As shown in
In “Test #2_OFDM,” a 6 Mbps OFDM signal with Bi-Phase Modulation added to the first 4 us of the signal was injected into the exemplary repeater with WLAN Only enabled and the output was measured. Exemplary repeater WLAN Only was set to search 4 μs for an 802.11g DSSS or OFDM. As shown in
In “Test #3_OFDM,” a 6 Mbps OFDM signal with Bi-Phase Modulation added to the first 4 μs of the signal was injected into the exemplary repeater with WLAN Only disabled and the output was measured. As shown in
Frequency Domain Operation: Referring to
Referring to
In “Test #1_OFDM” a 6 Mbps OFDM signal was injected into the spectrum analyzer without any phase modulation. As shown in
In “Test #2_OFDM” a 6 Mbps OFDM signal was injected into the spectrum analyzer with phase modulation added to the first 4 μs of the waveform. As shown in
In “Test #3_OFDM” a 6 Mbps OFDM signal was injected into the 594 MHz SAW filter and then into the spectrum analyzer with phase modulation added to the first 4 μs of the waveform. As shown in
In “Test #4_OFDM” a 6 Mbps OFDM signal was injected into 594 MHz low loss and high rejection SAWs and then into the spectrum analyzer with phase modulation added to the first 4 μs of the waveform. As shown in
Referring to
In “Test #2_DSSS,” a 1 Mbps DSSS signal was injected into the spectrum analyzer with phase modulation added to the first 4 μs of the waveform. As shown in
In “Test #3_DSSS,” a 1 Mbps DSSS signal was injected into the 594 MHz low loss SAW and then into the spectrum analyzer with phase modulation added to the first 4 us of the waveform. As shown in
In “Test #4_DSSS,” a 1 Mbps DSSS signal was injected into the 594 MHz low loss and high rejection SAWs and then into the spectrum analyzer with phase modulation added to the first 4 μs of the waveform. As shown in
Therefore, a repeater including the bi-phase modulation device 1832 can fully repeat a signal and not repeat a signal if a predetermined portion of the signal includes phase modulation and is in a WLAN only mode. Further, the modulated signal generated can pass through the 802.11 spectral masks when the modulated signal passes through one or more SAW filters. Here, the bi-phase modulator 1832 constitutes a signal modification device.
Referring to
The notch processor 2100 further includes control and status registers 2116 for outputting various signals representative of: matched filter peak windows (RX_NOTCH_MFPW1, RX_NOTCH_MFPW2); notch detection hysteresis control (RX_NOTCH_HYST); notch detection parameter control (RX_NOTCH_PAR1, RX_NOTCH_PAR2, RX_NOTCH_PAR3); and notch detection matched filter coefficient control (RX_NOTCH_MFC0-MFC19) to the notch detection section 2106. The notch detection section 2106 also outputs a signal representative of notch detection status (RX_NOTCH_STATUS) to the control and status registers 2116.
Returning to
At 2305, programmable hysteresis is performed to generate the hysteresis-filtered comparator outputs HYST_A, HYST_B, and the ADC channel selection signal ADC_SEL based upon the analog comparator outputs CMP_OUT_A, CMP_OUT_B. The signal RXND_HYST_CR is a signal from a control register indicative of the hysteresis span for CMP_OUT_A, CMP_OUT_B.
At 2310, RSSI channel selection is performed based upon signals HYST_A, HYST_B, and a signal ADC_SEL representative of the selective channel is generated. At 2315, HYST_A, HYST_B, and ADC_SEL are used to control the signals from the timer MFPW_TMR for controlling the detection window timing. The timer control is performed based upon the number of clock cycles elapsed since the packet's start. MFPW_TMR continues counting during temporary signal dropouts shorter than RXND_DROPOUT_CR clock cycles. Such dropouts frequently occur during the notch pattern at low received signal strengths.
At 2320, ADC_SEL is used to convert the two-channel interleaved RSSI output ADC_OUT into a single-channel de-multiplexed signal ADC_DATA. At 2325, ADC_DATA is processed through a non-linear “maximum of 3” operation to generate ADC_MAX. RXND_MAX_DISABLE_CR is for disabling the use of the 3-sample maximum.
At 2330, ADC_MAX is processed through a linear first-order programmable lowpass filter, which yields a slowly-varying value RSSI_AVG that closely tracks the received signal envelope peak excursions. At 2335, a slightly delayed copy of ADC_DATA, referred to as RSSI_VAL is subtracted from RSSI_AVG to yield the (signed) difference signal DIFF, which exhibits a strong positive excursion when a notch is encountered.
At 2340, DIFF is the input to a 20-tap programmable matched filter, whose unsigned output MF_SUM is clipped to the range 0 to 255. Signal RXND_MFC[0-19]_ENA is representative of a match filter tap status, RXND_MFC[0-19]_SIGN is representative of a matched filter tap coefficient sign, and signal RXND_MFC[0-19]_SHIFT is representative of a matched filter tap coefficient magnitude.
At 2345, RSSI_AVG is used to compute a variable matched filter threshold MF_THRESH based on the values of parameter control registers RXND_MFT_CONST_CR, RXND_MFT_SLOPE_CR, and RXND_MFT_MAX_CR.
At 2350, the notch detection section sets RX_NOTCH_DET to 1 and sets RX_NOTCH_CHAN equal to ADC_SEL, whenever MF_SUM equals or exceeds MF_THRESH during a narrow time window specified by control registers RXND_NOM_MFPW_CR and RXND_HWIN_MFPW_CR. The signals RX_NOTCH_DET and RX_NOTCH_CHAN are sent to the sequencer 2104.
Thus, a repeater including the notch processor 2100 according to the second embodiment can add a notch pattern to a repeated signal and detect a notch pattern in a received signal to mitigate the oscillation problem discussed above. Here, the notch processor 2100 constitutes a signal modification device.
According to a third embodiment, a repeater such as the repeater 1800 shown in
Referring to the flow diagram of
If the path loss is less than 80 dB (NO at 2415), then at 2425 the repeater transmits a number of XOS packets of a maximum length (64 bytes). At 2430, the RSSI from each successfully received packet is measured and averaged across all packets. A packet which has not been successfully received will be considered to have an RSSI of −80 dBm. At 2435, the repeater determines if the average RSSI is less than a predetermined dBm. If the average RSSI is less than the predetermined dBm (YES at 2435), then the routine ends. That is, the discovering repeater will assume that the current transmit power is acceptable and begin normal operation.
If the average RSSI is not less than the predetermined dBm (NO at 2435), then at 2440 the repeater adjusts the transmission power down by 1 dB and at 2445 retransmits the number of XOS packets. At 2450, the repeater determines if the average RSSI is less than the predetermined dBm. If the average RSSI is less than the predetermined dBm (YES at 2450), then the repeater begins normal operation.
If the average RSSI is not less than the predetermined dBm (NO at 2450), then at 2455 the repeater requests that the other repeater(s) on the same channel reduce the transmit power by 1 dB. At 2460 the repeater transmits the number of XOS packets. At 2465, the RSSI from each successfully received packet is measured and averaged across all packets. At 2470, the repeater determines if the average RSSI is less than the predetermined dBm. If the average RSSI is less than the predetermined dBm (YES at 2470), then the repeater begins normal operation.
If the average RSSI is still not less than the predetermined dBm (NO at 2470), then the repeater once again request that the other repeater(s) on its same channel reduce the transmit power by another 1 dB. This will continue with each repeater's power being dropped by 1 dBm, in turn, until the XOS packet test passes. However, if the non-discovering repeater would have to reduce it's transmit power to less than a predetermined amount such as, for example, 9 dB, the discovering repeater will request that the other repeater return to its original transmit power and the discovering repeater can choose a different channel to repeat onto. The current channel and all channels within a 5 channel separation will be marked as unavailable.
While the repeater is operating on the same channels as another repeater, the repeater which was enabled last will enable a monitor that checks for oscillations to occur. When an oscillation is detected, the repeater will perform the same power routine discussed above (2405-2420).
In addition, for every predetermined time period (e.g., 20 seconds) the monitoring repeater will attempt to increase it's transmit power by 1 dB until it has reached it's normal maximum transmit power. Each time the power on either repeater is incremented, an XOS test (2405-2420) will be performed to see if the increase is warranted. It will ratchet each side up in the same manner as the powers were dropped. Once a repeater has been requested to change the transmit power by another repeater, it can monitor the channel for a XOS_OSCMIT_HEARTBEAT messages from the controlling repeater. If a predetermined time period such as, for example, 20 seconds passes without receiving a heartbeat message from the controlling repeater, the slave unit will assume that the controlling repeater is no longer operating and will revert the power to the normal maximum transmit power for channel spacing configuration.
The above routine can also be applied when more than one other repeater is repeating to the same channels. However, in such as case a monitoring repeater may choose not to increase the power if it has determined within the certain time period (e.g., 10 seconds) that an oscillation would occur by doing so.
Thus, the repeater 1800 according to the third embodiment can execute the power adjustment routine to mitigate oscillation with one or more other receivers on a same channel within a wireless network.
This disclosure is intended to explain how to fashion and use various embodiments in accordance with the invention rather than to limit the true, intended, and fair scope and spirit thereof. The foregoing description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. For example, the repeater may be modified to identify packets previously repeated, and perform an action in response. The action may be to terminate transmission for oscillation mitigation, or to allow repeating depending on the specifics of the detection.
Further, a repeater can incorporate any number of the three embodiments discussed above. That is, the repeater is not limited to only one of the above-discussed embodiments. Further, the circuits discussed above are only exemplary manner for implementing the above described signal modification device. That is, the bi-phase modulation device 1832 and the notch processor 2100 can be implemented in a different manner, as long as a predetermined portion of the signal is modified so that a repeater receiving the modified signal takes an action different from its normal repeating action.
The embodiment(s) was chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application, and to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention. The various circuits described above can be implemented in discrete circuits or integrated circuits, as desired by implementation. Further, portions of the invention may be implemented in software or the like as will be appreciated by one of skill in the art and can be embodied as methods associated with the content described herein.
This application is related to and claims priority from pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/846,073 filed Sep. 21, 2006, and is further related to: U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006-0041680 (U.S. application Ser. No. 10/530,546) to Proctor et al., which is entitled “REDUCING LOOP EFFECTS IN A WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK REPEATER; and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005-0286448 to Proctor (U.S. application Ser. No. 10/516,327 or International Application No. PCT/US03/16208) to Proctor et al., which is entitled “WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK REPEATER” the contents all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/020485 | 9/21/2007 | WO | 00 | 4/21/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/036401 | 3/27/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3363250 | Jacobson | Jan 1968 | A |
4000467 | Lentz | Dec 1976 | A |
4001691 | Gruenberg | Jan 1977 | A |
4061970 | Magneron | Dec 1977 | A |
4081752 | Sumi | Mar 1978 | A |
4124825 | Webb et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4204016 | Chavannes | May 1980 | A |
4334323 | Moore | Jun 1982 | A |
4368541 | Evans | Jan 1983 | A |
4509206 | Carpe et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4679243 | McGeehan et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4701935 | Namiki | Oct 1987 | A |
4723302 | Fulmer et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4777653 | Bonnerot et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4783843 | Leff et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4820568 | Harpell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4922259 | Hall et al. | May 1990 | A |
5023930 | Leslie | Jun 1991 | A |
5095528 | Leslie et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5214788 | Delaperriere et al. | May 1993 | A |
5220562 | Takada et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5280480 | Pitt et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5333175 | Ariyavisitakul et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341364 | Marra et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349463 | Hirohashi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368897 | Kurihara et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371734 | Fischer | Dec 1994 | A |
5373503 | Chen | Dec 1994 | A |
5383144 | Kato | Jan 1995 | A |
5408197 | Miyake | Apr 1995 | A |
5408618 | Aho et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5430726 | Moorwood et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5446770 | Urabe et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465251 | Judd et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471642 | Palmer | Nov 1995 | A |
5485486 | Gilhousen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5509028 | Marque-Pucheu | Apr 1996 | A |
5515376 | Murthy et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519619 | Seda | May 1996 | A |
5608755 | Rakib | Mar 1997 | A |
5610916 | Kostreski et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5648984 | Kroninger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654979 | Levin et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659879 | Dupuy | Aug 1997 | A |
5678177 | Beasley | Oct 1997 | A |
5678198 | Lemson | Oct 1997 | A |
5684801 | Amitay et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697052 | Treatch | Dec 1997 | A |
5726980 | Rickard | Mar 1998 | A |
5732334 | Miyake | Mar 1998 | A |
5745846 | Myer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754540 | Liu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764636 | Edsall | Jun 1998 | A |
5767788 | Ness | Jun 1998 | A |
5771174 | Spinner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784683 | Sistanizadeh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794145 | Milam | Aug 1998 | A |
5812933 | Niki | Sep 1998 | A |
5815795 | Iwai | Sep 1998 | A |
5825809 | Sim | Oct 1998 | A |
5852629 | Iwamatsu | Dec 1998 | A |
5857144 | Mangum et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862207 | Aoshima | Jan 1999 | A |
5875179 | Tikalsky | Feb 1999 | A |
5883884 | Atkinson | Mar 1999 | A |
5884181 | Arnold et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890055 | Chu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903553 | Sakamoto et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907794 | Lehmusto et al. | May 1999 | A |
5963846 | Kurby | Oct 1999 | A |
5963847 | Ito et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987304 | Latt | Nov 1999 | A |
6005855 | Zehavi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005884 | Cook et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014380 | Hendel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032194 | Gai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6061548 | Reudink | May 2000 | A |
6088570 | Komara et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101400 | Ogaz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108364 | Weaver, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128512 | Trompower et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128729 | Kimball et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141335 | Kuwahara et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6163276 | Irving et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188694 | Fine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188719 | Collomby | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195051 | McCoy et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202114 | Dutt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215982 | Trompower | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219739 | Dutt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222503 | Gietema et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6272351 | Langston et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285863 | Zhang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298061 | Chin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304563 | Blessent et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304575 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331792 | Tonietto | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339694 | Komara et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342777 | Takahashi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363068 | Kinoshita | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370185 | Schmutz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370369 | Kraiem et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377612 | Baker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377640 | Trans | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6384765 | Sjostrand et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385181 | Tsutsui et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388995 | Gai et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393299 | Mizumoto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404775 | Leslie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441781 | Rog et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473131 | Neugebauer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480481 | Park et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498804 | Ide et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501955 | Durrant et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516438 | Wilcoxson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535732 | McIntosh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539028 | Soh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539204 | Marsh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549542 | Dong et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549567 | Fullerton | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563468 | Hill et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574198 | Petersson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6628624 | Mahajan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6664932 | Sabet et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671502 | Ogawa | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684058 | Karacaoglu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690657 | Lau et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694125 | White et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6718160 | Schmutz | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728541 | Ohkura et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6766113 | Al-Salameh et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6781544 | Saliga et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788256 | Hollister | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6880103 | Kim et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888809 | Foschini et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6888881 | Nagano | May 2005 | B1 |
6904266 | Jin et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906669 | Sabet et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6934511 | Lovinggood et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934555 | Silva et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944139 | Campanella | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6957042 | Williams | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965568 | Larsen | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983162 | Garani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985516 | Easton et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990313 | Yarkosky | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7027418 | Gan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027770 | Judd et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043203 | Miquel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050442 | Proctor | May 2006 | B1 |
7050452 | Sugar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058071 | Myles et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058368 | Nicholls et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065036 | Ryan | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7088734 | Newberg et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103344 | Menard | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120930 | Maufer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123670 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123676 | Gebara et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132988 | Yegin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133391 | Belcea | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133460 | Bae et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139527 | Tamaki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167526 | Liang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187904 | Gainey et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193975 | Tsutsumi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194275 | Bolin et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200134 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215964 | Miyake | May 2007 | B2 |
7230935 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233771 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248645 | Vialle et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254132 | Takao et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7299005 | Yarkosky et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315573 | Lusky et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319714 | Sakata et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321787 | Kim | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339926 | Stanwood et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352696 | Stephens et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7406060 | Periyalwar et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409186 | Van Buren et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7430397 | Suda et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7450936 | Kim | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457587 | Chung | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463200 | Gainey et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486929 | Van Buren et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7577398 | Judd et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590145 | Futch et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7623826 | Pergal | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7676194 | Rappaport | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729669 | Van Buren et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8023885 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027642 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8059727 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078100 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010028638 | Walton et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040699 | Osawa et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010050580 | O'Toole et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050906 | Odenwalder et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054060 | Fillebrown et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004924 | Kim et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020018479 | Kikkawa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020018487 | Chen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034958 | Oberschmidt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045461 | Bongfeldt | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072853 | Sullivan | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101843 | Sheng et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109585 | Sanderson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115409 | Khayrallah | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119783 | Bourlas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020146026 | Unitt et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155838 | Durrant et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159506 | Alamouti et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030008669 | Stein et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026363 | Stoter et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063583 | Padovani et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030124976 | Tamaki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148736 | Wright et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185163 | Bertonis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211828 | Dalgleish et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030235170 | Trainin | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001464 | Adkins et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029537 | Pugel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047333 | Han et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047335 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056802 | Hollister | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040121648 | Voros | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131025 | Dohler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146013 | Song et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157551 | Gainey et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166802 | McKay, Sr. et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176050 | Steer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208258 | Lozano et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218683 | Batra et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229563 | Fitton et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235417 | Dean | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240426 | Wu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040248581 | Seki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014464 | Larsson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050190822 | Fujii et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201315 | Lakkis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050286448 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028388 | Schantz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035643 | Vook et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041680 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045193 | Stolpman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052066 | Cleveland et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056352 | Proctor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063484 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063485 | Gainey et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067277 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072682 | Kent et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098592 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060203757 | Young et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060262026 | Gainey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070025349 | Bajic | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070025486 | Gainey et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032192 | Gainey et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070121546 | Zuckerman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070237181 | Cho et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070268846 | Proctor et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286110 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080057862 | Smith | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080232438 | Dai et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080267156 | Gubeskys et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090135745 | Gainey et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090190684 | She et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090323582 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002620 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2051283 | Mar 1992 | CA |
1137335 | Dec 1996 | CN |
1186401 | Jul 1998 | CN |
1256032 | Jun 2000 | CN |
1663149 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1706117 | Dec 2005 | CN |
0523687 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0709973 | May 1996 | EP |
0715423 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0847146 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0853393 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0860953 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1548526 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1615354 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2272599 | May 1994 | GB |
2351420 | Dec 2000 | GB |
62040895 | Feb 1987 | JP |
63160442 | Jul 1988 | JP |
64011428 | Jan 1989 | JP |
02100358 | Apr 1990 | JP |
03021884 | Jan 1991 | JP |
0563623 | Mar 1993 | JP |
05102907 | Apr 1993 | JP |
06013947 | Jan 1994 | JP |
06334577 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07030473 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07079187 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07079205 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07131401 | May 1995 | JP |
08097762 | Apr 1996 | JP |
8274683 | Oct 1996 | JP |
08274706 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09018484 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09130322 | May 1997 | JP |
09162801 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9162903 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09182155 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09214418 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10032557 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10107727 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10135892 | May 1998 | JP |
10242932 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11055713 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11127104 | May 1999 | JP |
11298421 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000031877 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000502218 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000082983 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000509536 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000236290 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000269873 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001016152 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001111575 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001136115 | May 2001 | JP |
2001217896 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001244864 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001357480 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002033691 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002111571 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002223188 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002271255 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002281042 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003174394 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003198442 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003244050 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004056210 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004328666 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004538682 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005072646 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005110150 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005191691 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005236626 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005252692 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005295499 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005531202 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005531265 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006503481 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006505146 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006197488 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2007528147 | Oct 2007 | JP |
19980063664 | Oct 1998 | KR |
1020040004261 | Jan 2004 | KR |
100610929 | Aug 2006 | KR |
2120702 | Oct 1998 | RU |
2233045 | Jul 2004 | RU |
2242086 | Dec 2004 | RU |
2249916 | Apr 2005 | RU |
2264036 | Nov 2005 | RU |
WO9214339 | Aug 1992 | WO |
9505037 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO9622636 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO9715991 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9734434 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9852365 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO9858461 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO9923844 | May 1999 | WO |
WO9959264 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0050971 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0152447 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0176098 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0182512 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0199308 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO0208857 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO0217572 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO03013005 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO2004001892 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004001986 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004002014 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004004365 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004032362 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004036789 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004038958 | May 2004 | WO |
04047308 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2004062305 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2004107693 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005050918 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005069249 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005069656 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005115022 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2007/020485, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Mar. 19, 2008. |
Andrisano, et al., On the Spectral Efficiency of CPM Systems over Real Channel in the Presence of Adjacent Channel and CoChannel Interference: A Comparison between Partial and Full Response Systems, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 39, No. 2, May 1990. |
Anonymous: Extract from IEEE P802.16e/D7, Apr. 2005 “Draft IEEE Standard for local and metropolitan area networks; Part 16: Air interface for fixed and mobile broadband wireless access systems; Amendment for physical and medium access control layers for combined fixed and mobile operation in licensed bands,” IEEE [Apr. 8, 2005] pp. 194-196, XP002545971. |
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47 Telecommunication; “Federal Communications Commission code part 15.407,” Federal Communications Commission vol. 1, chapter I, part 15.407. |
First Office Action issued from the Chinese Patent Office in connection with corresponding Chinese application No. 200380101286.2 (Jan. 19, 2007). |
Dohler, M. et al., “Distributed PHY-Layer Mesh Networks,” 14th IEEE 2003 International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communication Proceedings, 2003. PIMRC 2003. The United States of America, IEEE, vol. 3, pp. 2543 to 2547, Sep. 7, 2003, doi: 10.1109/PIMRC.2003.1259184. |
First Report issued by IP Australia on Jul. 31, 2007 in connection with the corresponding Australian application No. 2003239577. |
Fujil, T. et al., “Ad-hoc Cognitive Radio Cooperated with MAC Layer,” IEIC Technical Report (Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers), Japan, Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (IEIC), May 4, 2005, vol. 105 (36), pp. 59 to 66. |
IEEE 802.16e/D12, “Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems—Amendment for Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands,” IEEE, Oct. 2005. |
IEEE Computer Society and the IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society: “Draft IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems; Amendment for Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands,” IEEE P802.16e/D12, New York, USA, Oct. 14, 2005. |
IEEE, “Corrigendum to IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems,” Draft Standard, Sep. 12, 2005, 288 pages, P802.16/2004/Cor1/D5, New York, New York. |
IEEE Std 802.11-1999 (Reaff 2003), “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications,” LAN MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society; Paragraphs 7.2.3.1 and 7.2.3.9; Paragraph 7.3.2.4; Paragraphs 15.4.6.2 and 18.4.6.2. |
IEEE Std 802.11b-1999, “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: Higher-Speed Physical Layer Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band,” IEEE-SA Standards Board, Supplement to ANSI/IEEE Std. 802.11, 1999 Edition, Approved Sep. 16, 1999. |
IEEE Std 802.11g-2003, “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: Amendment 4: Further Higher Data Rate Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band,” IEEE Computer Society, Published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Jun. 27, 2003. |
IEEE Std 802.16-2001; “Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems,” IEEE Computer Society and the IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society, Published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Apr. 8, 2002. |
Kannangara, et al., “Analysis of an Adaptive Wideband Duplexer with Double-Loop Cancellation,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 56, No. 4, Jul. 2007, pp. 1971-1982. |
Kutlu, et al., “Performance Analysis of MAC Protocols for Wireless Control Area Network,” 1996 IEEE, pp. 494-499. |
Mexican Office communication dated Jul. 2, 2007 issued from Mexican Patent Office for application PA/a/2004/011588 with partial translation thereof. |
Notification of the First Office Action from Chinese Patent Office dates Sep. 8, 2006 for the corresponding Chinese patent application No. 200380105267.7. |
Office Action English translation dated Jul. 4, 2008 issued from Chinese Patent Office for Application No. 03814391.7. |
Office Action English translation dated Jun. 29, 2009 issued from Japanese Patent Office for Application No. 2004-541532. |
Office Action issued from the Mexican Patent Office dated Feb. 22, 2008 in connection with the corresponding Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2004/011588. |
Office communication dated Jan. 12, 2007 issued from the European Patent Office for counterpart application No. 03734139.9-1246. |
Office communication dated Oct. 19, 2006 issued from the Mexican Patent Office for counterpart application No. PA/a/2004/011588. |
Official communication issued from the European Patent Office dated Aug. 7, 2007 for the corresponding European patent application No. 03759271.4-2412. |
Official communication issued from the European Patent Office dated Dec. 19, 2006 for the corresponding European patent application No. 03759271.4-2412. |
Second Office Action issued from the Chinese Patent Office on Jul. 20, 2007 in connection with corresponding Chinese application No. 200380101286.2. |
Specifications for2.3 GHz Band Portable Internet Service—Physical & Medium Access Control Layer, TTAS.KO-06.0082/R1, Dec. 2005. |
Third Office Action issued from the Patent Office of People's Republic of China dated Jan. 4, 2008 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 200380101286.2. |
U.S. PTO Office Action mailed on Apr. 17, 2007 for the corresponding parent U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,838, now U.S. Patent No. 7,230,935. |
U.S. PTO Office Action mailed on Jan. 24, 2007 for the corresponding parent U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,838, now U.S. Patent No. 7,230,935. |
U.S. PTO Office Action mailed on Nov. 21, 2006 for the corresponding parent U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,838, now U.S. Patent No. 7,230,935. |
U.S. PTO Office Action mailed on Nov. 6, 2006 for the corresponding parent U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,838, now U.S. Patent No. 7,230,935. |
Zimmermann, E. et al., “On the Performance of Cooperative Diversity Protocols in Practical Wireless Systems,” IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003, The United States of America, IEEE, Oct. 6, 2003, vol. 4, pp. 2212 to 2216. |
Supplementary European Search Report—EP07838644—Search Authority—The Hague—Nov. 4, 2011. |
Nov. 11, 2004 (080607EP). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090290526 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60846073 | Sep 2006 | US |