The present invention is directed to a method and an apparatus for mixing streams of gases to form a combined stream.
The federal government and other authorities regulate allowable exhaust emissions from gasoline and diesel engines for automobiles, trucks, and other vehicles, such as off-road construction or agricultural vehicles, in an effort to reduce pollution. In order to ensure compliance with these regulations, the exhaust gases of these engines must be tested or otherwise analyzed for undesirable combustion by-products, such as hydrocarbons, carbon monoxides, sulphates, and/or oxides of nitrogen. In general, testing is accomplished by introducing exhaust gases, diluting these exhaust gases with clean air, and obtaining samples after the exhaust gases and dilution air are properly mixed.
Dilution tunnels are one known type of device for collecting, diluting, cooling, and mixing exhaust gases with filtered, ambient, and conditioned air in a ratio of gas to air for sampling and analyzing. At one end, a typical dilution tunnel has one inlet for receiving exhaust gases and another inlet for receiving the filtered air. An orifice plate is typically placed downstream of the exhaust gas and air inlets in order to induce turbulent flow and facilitate mixing of the exhaust gas and diluting air. Downstream of the orifice plate a probe is located in the tunnel to collect a sample of the mixture for analysis. One problem with placing orifice plates, or other obstructions such as inlet pipes, in the stream is that they tend to collect and remove some of the particulate matter from the stream, which distorts the downstream samples. Moreover, abrupt changes in tunnel geometry may also cause particulate matter to collect on the tunnel walls. This particulate matter may build up on the plate or walls over time and then periodically flake off, further distorting the samples taken downstream.
Full dilution tunnels collect and dilute the entire exhaust gas flow from the engine being tested. Current EPA regulations recommend that the dilution tunnels be sized to permit development of turbulent flow (Reynold's number greater than 4000) and obtain a homogeneous mixture of the exhaust and dilution air at the sampling location. Depending upon the engine displacement, in order to meet this requirement, a typical full dilution tunnel diameter may be on the order of 203 to 610 mm (8 to 24 inches) and a typical tunnel length, which is usually ten times the diameter, may be on the order of 2032 to 6100 mm (80 to 240 inches). The tunnel diameter and length is sized to insure proper mixing of the exhaust gas with the diluting air prior to taking the sample. The larger the engine displacement, the larger the tunnel diameter and tunnel length must be to accommodate the greater flow of exhaust gas. Thus, dilution tunnels for large displacement engines may be very bulky, even taking up entire rooms.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,258 discloses a multiple flow-dividing dilution tunnel system. Dilution air is introduced at one end of the tunnel. Further downstream, a portion of an exhaust gas stream is introduced into the tunnel via an exhaust gas inlet pipe inserted into the stream of dilution air. Further downstream, but proximate the end of the exhaust gas inlet pipe, a plurality of nozzles are inserted into the stream of dilution air/exhaust gas for introducing more dilution air, in this instance, a controlled amount of pressurized dilution air. This introduction of pressurized dilution air is used to properly maintain the ratio of the rate of the divided exhaust gas introduced into the dilution tunnel via the exhaust gas inlet pipe to the rate of the total gas introduced into the system, even during pressure loss fluctuations. One drawback of this system is that it requires a complex control system for reacting to pressure fluctuations. Another drawback is that it also requires a complex system of piping, both for splitting the exhaust gas stream and for introducing the pressurized dilution air. A further drawback is that the exhaust inlet pipe is exposed to the dilution air stream prior to the exhaust gas exiting the inlet pipe, causing undesirable cooling of the exhaust gas prior to mixing.
The disclosed method and apparatus for mixing streams of gases solves one or more of the problems set forth above.
One aspect of the present invention is directed to a method of mixing a first stream of gas with a second stream of gas. The method includes introducing the first stream of gas into a first stream manifold and directing the first stream from the first stream manifold into a mixing chamber via a plurality of first stream passages flow coupled to the mixing chamber. The second stream of gas is directed into the mixing chamber via at least one second stream passage flow Coupled to a first end of the mixing chamber. A combined stream is formed from the first and second streams, gradually converged, and discharged from the mixing chamber through a mixing chamber exit port.
In another aspect, the present invention is directed to an apparatus for mixing a first and second stream of gas. The apparatus includes a first stream manifold configured to receive the first stream of gas, and a first plurality of passages flow coupled to and extending from the first stream manifold. A mixing chamber having first and second ends is flow coupled to the first plurality of passages and configured to receive the second stream of gas at the first end. The mixing chamber has an exit port at the second end and a cross-section adjacent the second end which gradually converges as the distance to the exit port decreases.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
In one embodiment, as shown in
As shown in
Second stream 20 is shown in
First stream 10 and second stream 20 are introduced into mixing chamber 30. Mixing chamber 30 has a first end 31 and a second end 32 opposite first end 31. As shown in
As best shown in
Mixing chamber 30, as best shown in
Within mixing chamber 30, first stream 10 and second stream 20 lose their separate identities and are combined into a combined stream 40. Combined stream 40 exits mixing chamber 30 through an exit port 34 located at second end 32. Combined stream 40 need not be a uniformly mixed stream by the time it exits mixing chamber 30 through exit port 34. Rather, combined stream 40 may include both first and second streams 10, 20 in a partially mixed state.
Second end 32 of mixing chamber 30 may include a portion wherein the cross-section gradually and symmetrically converges or necks down as the distance to exit port 34 decreases. A cross-section “gradually converges” when the cross-section becomes smaller and smaller in a series of steps or degrees, as opposed to an abrupt transition between two differently sized openings. As shown in
As best shown in
Within secondary mixing region 50, uniform mixing, such as required for testing, of combined stream 40 may be achieved. A sampling device (not shown), such as any probe known to persons of ordinary skill in the art, may be located in secondary mixing region 50, such as, for example, adjacent to a downstream end thereof.
Downstream of secondary mixing region 50, combined stream 40 may be directed through a turn, for example, around a corner, to minimize the total length of the system. However, turning the stream may induce undesirable separation effects in combined stream 40 upstream of the turn, i.e., where the sampling probe may be located. A reservoir box 60, which may be a relatively large-volume chamber, may be flow coupled to secondary mixing region 50 at the downstream end of region 50. As shown in
A second embodiment of an apparatus for mixing gases is illustrated in
First stream manifold 12 may be configured as an annular chamber encircling mixing chamber 30, as shown in
Entrance ports 13, 13a, 13b may include diffuser sections for slowing the flow of first streams 10, 10a, 10b, respectively. Diffuser sections may inhibit the impingement of first streams 10, 10a, 10b on the wall of first stream manifold 12 opposite the entrance ports 13, 13a, 13b, thereby, for instance, inhibiting any particulate matter that may be carried by streams 10, 10a, 10b from collecting or being deposited on the wall of first stream manifold 12.
First stream manifold 12 may be formed with smooth internal wall surfaces to assist in minimizing the deposition of particulate matter on the walls.
A plurality of first stream passages 14 are flow coupled to and extend between first stream manifold 12 and mixing chamber 30. As shown in
Mixing chamber 30, as best shown in
Second stream 20 enters second stream manifold 22 prior to entering mixing chamber 30 via entrance port 35. Second stream manifold 22 may be an annular manifold similar to annular manifold 12 as shown in
Within mixing chamber 30 of
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires transient emissions tests to be conducted for on-highway diesel engines. When utilizing a full dilution tunnel system, the EPA regulations (for instance, 40 CFR, Chapter 1, §83.1310) require that the raw diesel engine exhaust be mixed or diluted with clean air in order to reduce the overall temperature of the exhaust levels. These EPA regulations require good mixing over the entire cross-section of the diluted flow of exhaust at the point where the emission samples are collected.
The apparatus and method provided may be used for mixing a first gas with a second gas prior to sampling a combined stream of the gases, in order to, for example, efficiently test exhaust gas samples for compliance with the EPA pollution regulations. In one exemplary use, the exhaust pipe of a diesel engine could be flow coupled to passage 24 as shown in
A source of conditioned dilution air could be flow coupled to inlet pipe 11, also as shown in
Passage 24, which carries the exhaust gas, is never in contact with the dilution air stream. Similarly, the exhaust gas stream never contacts passages 14, which carry the dilution air. Isolating these passages from the opposing streams prevents the possibility of pre-cooling the exhaust stream prior to its discharge into mixing chamber 30, which could lead to soot deposition on the walls of passage 24, and also prevents the possibility of the streams losing their well-developed flow profiles. Moreover, isolating these passages from the opposing streams greatly simplifies insulation concerns.
Apparatus 100 includes components, for instance, passages 14, manifold 12, passage 24, mixing chamber 30, secondary mixing region 50, etc., that have smooth internal walls, i.e., walls having surfaces that are not rough, to minimize the deposition of particulate matter on the internal wall surfaces. In addition, these components are free of any internal projections, such a inlet pipes, or other structures, such as baffles or orifice plates, extending from the internal walls into the flows. So, for instance, minimal particulate matter from the exhaust gas is deposited on surfaces within mixing chamber 30, because mixing chamber 30 has no projections, edges, or other structure extending into the flow stream. Moreover, if smooth, electro-polished, passivated, stainless steel is used to form the internal surfaces of mixing chamber 30 or other components of apparatus 100, the deposition of particulate matter on the internal surfaces of apparatus 100 may be minimized.
Within mixing chamber 30, the exhaust gas and the dilution air begin to mix in a uniform manner into a combined stream 40. Prior to exiting mixing chamber 30 through exit port 34, combined stream 40 travels through a converged portion of mixing chamber 30. This converged or necked down portion of mixing chamber 30 causes the velocity and the pressure of combined stream 40 to increase, and facilitates quick and uniform mixing of the combined stream. Downstream of mixing chamber 30, combined stream 40 travels through a cylindrical, venturi type, or similar type of secondary mixing region 50 to finalize the uniform mixing of the exhaust gas with the dilution air prior to a portion of the combined stream being collected for sampling purposes.
Even for large output engines, such as engines rated between 150 and 750 horsepower, apparatus 100, because of its compact size relative to existing full dilution tunnels, may be designed to fit into the same room that also houses the engine. For instance, apparatus 100 may be designed with pipes being no more than 0.64 meters (24 inches) in diameter. Finally, apparatus 100 may be designed to allow the use of standard pipes and standard-pipe fittings, thus, minimizing the use of specially built parts and substantially decreasing the cost of manufacture.
The disclosed system may also be utilized with dual test cells, thereby providing an even more compact and efficient system. As an example of the use of the embodiment shown in
It will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the method and apparatus for mixing gases of the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Additionally, other embodiments of the invention may be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/137,370, filed May 3, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,684,719.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2353865 | Armstrong | Jul 1944 | A |
3699814 | Kaufman | Oct 1972 | A |
3913617 | van Laar et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4398827 | Dietrich | Aug 1983 | A |
4647212 | Hankison | Mar 1987 | A |
4660408 | Lewis | Apr 1987 | A |
5058440 | Graze, Jr. | Oct 1991 | A |
5090258 | Yamasaki et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5129412 | Hendry | Jul 1992 | A |
5184501 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5410907 | Ström et al. | May 1995 | A |
5450749 | Ström et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5604319 | Kohsaka et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5967224 | Iwanaga et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6114178 | Dezael et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6293161 | Hanashiro et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6370936 | Yamagishi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6684719 | Gehner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2077127 | Dec 1981 | GB |
531777 | Aug 1955 | IT |
1408004 | Jul 1988 | SU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040089078 A1 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10137370 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 10702444 | US |