1. Technical Field
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for mounting a brake disc in a disc brake. A particular application of the invention is to a spot-type automotive disc brake in which at least one, and preferably two brake discs are mounted for axial movement in use with respect to a central drive hub which drives the discs and on which they exert a braking effect during use. Typically, the central drive hub is a wheel mounting of an automobile. Certain aspects of the invention may find application outside the confines of spot-type automotive disc brakes.
2. Related Art
We have established that spot-type single or multi-disc disc brakes of the kind comprising axially movable discs can provide significant advantages over conventional spot-type automotive disc brakes. These advantages are set out in a series of patent applications which we have filed covering various aspects of the constructional differences between such brakes and conventional automotive disc brakes.
One aspect of these constructional differences relates to the use of resilient means acting between the one or more brake discs and the rotatable mounting therefor, such resilient means being provided to control certain aspects of the dynamics or movement of the brake discs during use. Reference is made to the disclosure in WO 98/26192 for a representative prior disclosure in this regard, and likewise too WO 98/25804. This latter disclosure concerns a disc brake system in which a plurality of leaf springs mounted on a hub and engaging the brake disc apply radially-directed forces between the disc and the hub.
However, we have discovered that the mode of mounting the resilient means with respect to the drive hub is of significance in relation to the effective operation of the resilient means for the brake as a whole, not to mention the resilient function itself.
As a matter of simple design principles, it is to be expected that the optimum arrangement would be as disclosed in our above-identified prior applications in which the resilient means is mounted on the hub and exerts its resilient or biasing effect on the disc by virtue of limited contact with the disc at certain well defined locations depending on the exact resilient means (or spring) design and the spring location.
Such an approach is consistent with the design principles emerging from the basic structure of the disc brake in which the relatively massive central hub provides a convenient reference base not only structurally for the mounting of the biasing springs, but also a relatively massive heat sink whereby a substantial thermal gradient exists in use between the brake disc with its locally-generated thermal energy and relatively low thermal capacity, whereby thermal factors favor minimizing the numbers of components to be subjected to frequent substantial thermal gradients, particularly components such as springs which are reliant upon thermally sensitive physical properties such as resilience.
However, we have discovered that despite the fact that the obviously apparent factors favor the adoption of the disc-mounting principles (with respect to resilient bias) disclosed in the prior art, there are significant and unexpected compensatory advantages in adopting the reverse approach wherein it is the disc itself which provides a mounting base for the resilient means (for example a series of circumferentially-spaced springs), whereby these can be considered as exerting a resilient bias which is directed from their mounting base on the disc to the rotatable disc-mounting hub, contrary to the teachings of the prior art.
In embodiments of the invention there are provided resilient means adapted to be mounted on the axially slideable brake disc in various ways and in various formats providing individual variations in ease of construction and mounting.
In one embodiment the individual resilient means straddle (either as a unitary construction or as to individual resilient elements) a series of projecting drive keys constructed to slideably cooperate with a series of complementary keyways formed in the rotatable mounting hub for the brake disc. This arrangement provides simplicity of achieving equi-spaced and likewise-balanced application of the resilient bias, without the need for cap screws or similar (potentially liable to corrosion) mounting means.
The location of the spring or other resilient means with respect to the disc is achieved in the embodiments by use of a spring configuration which is adapted to cooperate with the structure of the disc. For example, where a wire-format spring is adopted, then it becomes feasible for a structure to be adopted for that spring in which the spring is self-locating with respect to the external profile of the disc and passing from one side of the disc to the other as necessary for location and loading purposes. Where a leaf-spring format is adopted, it becomes feasible for the spring to adopt the use of a pair of gripping flanges adapted to engage on opposite sides of a relevant portion of the disc.
Where a wire-format spring is adopted, a related advantage achieved is with respect to the self-cleaning ability of the brake disc and mounting hub assembly, with respect to which the adoption of a wire spring format provides significantly enhanced ability to allow the escape of particulate and other detritus and other foreign matter whether wet or dry.
A further practical advantage arising from the mounting of the resilient means on the brake disc or discs relates to the dynamics of the axially slideable mounting of the brake disc or discs with the respect to the drive hub or mounting means therefor. We have discovered that one result of the mounting of the resilient means on the hub itself in prior proposals is that appreciable variations in the spring force arise from disc movement itself and from the adoption of two or more discs mounted in face-to-face relationship on the same hub or mounting.
By adopting the concept of mounting the resilient means on the disc or discs themselves an independence of spring effect is achieved since for each spring its interaction with the disc is constant at all times and the axial sliding movement of the disc relative to the hub has negligible effect on the spring interaction with this latter structure since the resilient means slides axially with the disc. Where two or more discs are employed, the spring effect for each is achieved by an identical spring assembly, or a suitably proportioned spring assembly, in order to achieve an identical net spring effect.
In the embodiments of the present invention the disc brake incorporates resilient means both in relation to the mounting of the brake discs on their mounting hub and in relation to the brake friction elements or pads in relation to their fixed mounting or caliper.
The resilient means are of a structure and strength chosen to be capable of, both in the case of the brake discs and in the case of the brake friction elements, maintaining these components of the brake assembly in their required working attitudes with respect to the structures on which they are mounted. In other words, the springs or resilient means for the brake discs are constructed so as to hold the brake discs in non-tilted working attitudes as they rotate. Likewise, the resilient means for the friction elements or pads maintain these latter structures in their required attitudes with respect to their fixed mounting or caliper. In both cases, the resilient nature of the resilient means permits, under the dynamic conditions arising during use of the vehicle and due to engine vibration and vehicle motion/road surface induced vibration and similar factors, a degree of movement from the defined working position (as opposed to the linear axial sliding movement needed to effect friction element-to-disc engagement and disengagement when commencing and terminating braking) which is needed under normal conditions of vehicle use.
In this regard, it is to be noted that the resilient means or springs used in the embodiments in relation to the friction elements for maintaining same in their normal non-tilted attitudes, differ significantly from the springs disclosed in the above-identified WO 98/25804 and WO 98/26192 specifications in which the pad springs are mere anti-rattle springs not adapted to hold the brake pads against tilting movement, but merely to avoid rattling.
Moreover, in the embodiments of the present invention the springs for the discs and for the pads are balanced in terms of their relative loading applied to the discs and the pads in order to achieve the necessary separation of same when braking is discontinued and yet holding the pads and discs against tilting during use. Thus, the spring forces exerted on the pads or friction elements of the present invention are much stronger than those needed merely to prevent rattling or noise suppression. The spring forces are sufficient to restrain the slideable brake pads or friction elements from moving into contact with the brake discs in an uncontrolled manner. The use of the substantially stronger pad springs in the present embodiments assists in positioning the outer rims of the brake discs in their brake-off position for reducing residual braking torque.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings, wherein:
In
As shown in
Two pairs of friction elements indicated at 16, 18 and 20, 22 are adapted to frictionally engage braking surfaces on opposite sides of brake discs 12, 14 to effect braking on actuation of actuation means 24 therefor. Brake discs 12, 14 are axially slideable in use with respect to mounting hub 15 therefor under the action of friction elements 16, 18 and 20, 22 and actuation means 24 during braking.
Resilient device or means 26 is provided at circumferentially-spaced positions around brake discs 12, 14 and is adapted to act between the brake discs and mounting therefor at said positions. The mounting of the resilient means 26 with respect to the brake disc 12, and on same, is such that the resilient means slides axially with the disc.
Also shown in
Likewise shown in
Turning now to the embodiments of
In the embodiments of
The seven embodiments described below differ in the details whereby the resilient means is mounted on the disc.
As shown in
As shown in
In this embodiment, four keys and corresponding springs are provided per disc. Each spring is retained by its respective key.
Turning to the embodiment of
Turning now to the embodiment of
As previously, four such springs are provided per disc, with the hairpin spring portions 76 disposed alternately at opposite sides of the disc.
In the embodiment of
In this embodiment four springs are provided per disc, although only three can be seen in FIG. 14.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. The invention is defined by the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0010810 | May 2000 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTGB01/01958 | 4/17/2001 | WO | 00 | 4/9/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0186167 | 11/15/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2724252 | Schmal | Nov 1955 | A |
2737033 | Bendall | Mar 1956 | A |
2764261 | Bridges | Sep 1956 | A |
3146860 | Wilson | Sep 1964 | A |
3191735 | Warvak | Jun 1965 | A |
3233704 | Strain et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3642101 | Hauth | Feb 1972 | A |
3754624 | Eldred | Aug 1973 | A |
3837420 | Kobeit | Sep 1974 | A |
3844385 | Szekely | Oct 1974 | A |
3861501 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3915272 | Maurice | Oct 1975 | A |
4043437 | Taylor | Aug 1977 | A |
4256209 | Lupertz | Mar 1981 | A |
4318306 | Fischer | Mar 1982 | A |
4479569 | Kummer et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4534457 | Eltze et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4576255 | Mery et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4673065 | Gerard et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4699254 | Mery | Oct 1987 | A |
4844206 | Casey | Jul 1989 | A |
4863000 | Patel | Sep 1989 | A |
4865160 | Casey | Sep 1989 | A |
5005676 | Gassiat | Apr 1991 | A |
5358079 | Brown | Oct 1994 | A |
5383538 | Bair et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5402865 | Harker | Apr 1995 | A |
5674026 | Ishibashi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
6056089 | Karlsson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6131932 | Bunker | Oct 2000 | A |
6223863 | Bunker | May 2001 | B1 |
6244391 | Bunker | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247560 | Bunker | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298953 | Bunker | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305510 | Bunker | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6457567 | Bunker | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6511135 | Ballinger et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6626272 | Frouin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1205345 | Nov 1965 | DE |
2039003 | Feb 1971 | DE |
3740373 | Jun 1988 | DE |
0096553 | Dec 1983 | EP |
662071 | Nov 1951 | GB |
949018 | Feb 1964 | GB |
1091693 | Nov 1967 | GB |
1139699 | Jan 1969 | GB |
1350350 | Apr 1974 | GB |
1396503 | Jun 1975 | GB |
1530461 | Nov 1978 | GB |
2015122 | Sep 1979 | GB |
2031538 | Apr 1980 | GB |
2150263 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2164712 | Mar 1986 | GB |
2184801 | Jul 1987 | GB |
2320299 | Jun 1998 | GB |
2320300 | Jun 1998 | GB |
2320301 | Jun 1998 | GB |
2340561 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2340562 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2340563 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2340564 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2346940 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2361973 | Nov 2001 | GB |
8905924 | Jun 1989 | WO |
9720150 | Jun 1997 | WO |
9825804 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9826192 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9826191 | Jun 1998 | WO |
0009900 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0009903 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0009904 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0009905 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0009909 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0009911 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0042332 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0103295 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0133096 | May 2001 | WO |
0140671 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0186165 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030006108 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |