Method and apparatus for navigational ray tracing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11416000
  • Patent Number
    11,416,000
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 7, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 16, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A method of navigational ray casting in a computing device includes: obtaining a distance map having a plurality of cells representing respective sub-regions of an environment containing obstacles; wherein each cell defines a minimum obstacle distance indicating a distance from the corresponding sub-region to a nearest one of the obstacles; selecting an origin cell from the plurality of cells, and setting the origin cell as a current cell; selecting a ray cast direction for a ray originating from the origin cell; retrieving the minimum obstacle distance defined by the current cell; selecting a test cell at the minimum obstacle distance from the current cell in the ray cast direction; determining whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles; and when the determination is affirmative, determining a total distance between the origin cell and the test cell.
Description
BACKGROUND

Environments in which objects are managed, such as retail facilities, may be complex and fluid. For example, a retail facility may include objects such as products for purchase, a distribution environment may include objects such as parcels or pallets, a manufacturing environment may include objects such as components or assemblies, a healthcare environment may include objects such as medications or medical devices.


A mobile apparatus may be employed to perform tasks within the environment, such as capturing data for use in identifying products that are out of stock, incorrectly located, and the like. To travel within the environment, the mobile apparatus may be configured to perform mapping and localization functions (e.g. to determine a current location of the mobile apparatus within a map of the environment). Such mapping and localization functions may employ ray casting to determine distances between a location of the mobile apparatus and obstacles represented in the map. Ray casting mechanisms may be computationally expensive, however, requiring the mobile apparatus to query numerous portions of the map, to generate a vector representation of the map, or the like.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.



FIG. 1 is a schematic of a mobile automation system.



FIG. 2A depicts a mobile automation apparatus in the system of FIG. 1.



FIG. 2B is a block diagram of certain internal hardware components of the mobile automation apparatus in the system of FIG. 1.



FIG. 2C is a block diagram of certain internal components of the apparatus of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for navigational ray casting at the apparatus of FIG. 2A.



FIG. 4A is an overhead view of an operational environment for the apparatus of FIGS. 2A-2C.



FIG. 4B is an occupancy map corresponding to the environment of FIG. 4A.



FIG. 5A is a distance map generated from the occupancy map of FIG. 4B.



FIG. 5B is a detail view of the portion 508 of the distance map of FIG. 5A.



FIGS. 6A-6B and 7A-7B illustrate a performance of the method of FIG. 3, including repeated performances of blocks 320-335, in connection with the distance map of FIG. 5A.





Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.


The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Examples disclosed herein are directed to a method of navigational ray casting in a computing device, comprising: obtaining a distance map having a plurality of cells representing respective sub-regions of an environment containing obstacles; wherein each cell defines a minimum obstacle distance indicating a distance from the corresponding sub-region to a nearest one of the obstacles; selecting an origin cell from the plurality of cells, and setting the origin cell as a current cell; selecting a ray cast direction for a ray originating from the origin cell; retrieving the minimum obstacle distance defined by the current cell; selecting a test cell at the minimum obstacle distance from the current cell in the ray cast direction; determining whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles; and when the determination is affirmative, determining a total distance between the origin cell and the test cell.


Additional examples disclosed herein are directed to a mobile automation apparatus, comprising: a memory storing a distance map having a plurality of cells representing respective sub-regions of an environment containing obstacles; wherein each cell defines a minimum obstacle distance indicating a distance from the corresponding sub-region to a nearest one of the obstacles; and a navigational controller connected to the memory and configured to: retrieve the distance map from the memory; select an origin cell from the plurality of cells, and setting the origin cell as a current cell; select a ray cast direction for a ray originating from the origin cell; retrieve the minimum obstacle distance defined by the current cell; select a test cell at the minimum obstacle distance from the current cell in the ray cast direction; determine whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles; and when the determination is affirmative, determine a total distance between the origin cell and the test cell.



FIG. 1 depicts a mobile automation system 100 in accordance with the teachings of this disclosure. The system 100 is illustrated as being deployed in a retail environment, but in other embodiments can be deployed in a variety of other environments, including warehouses, hospitals, and the like. The system 100 includes a server 101 in communication with at least one mobile automation apparatus 103 (also referred to herein simply as the apparatus 103) and at least one client computing device 105 via communication links 107, illustrated in the present example as including wireless links. In the present example, the links 107 are provided by a wireless local area network (WLAN) deployed within the retail environment by one or more access points (not shown). In other examples, the server 101, the client device 105, or both, are located outside the retail environment, and the links 107 therefore include wide-area networks such as the Internet, mobile networks, and the like. The system 100 also includes a dock 108 for the apparatus 103 in the present example. The dock 108 is in communication with the server 101 via a link 109 that in the present example is a wired link. In other examples, however, the link 109 is a wireless link.


The client computing device 105 is illustrated in FIG. 1 as a mobile computing device, such as a tablet, smart phone or the like. In other examples, the client device 105 is implemented as another type of computing device, such as a desktop computer, a laptop computer, another server, a kiosk, a monitor, and the like. The system 100 can include a plurality of client devices 105 in communication with the server 101 via respective links 107.


The system 100 is deployed, in the illustrated example, in a retail environment including a plurality of shelf modules 110-1, 110-2, 110-3 and so on (collectively referred to as shelves 110, and generically referred to as a shelf 110—this nomenclature is also employed for other elements discussed herein). Each shelf module 110 supports a plurality of products 112. Each shelf module 110 includes a shelf back 116-1, 116-2, 116-3 and a support surface (e.g. support surface 117-3 as illustrated in FIG. 1) extending from the shelf back 116 to a shelf edge 118-1, 118-2, 118-3.


The shelf modules 110 are typically arranged in a plurality of aisles, each of which includes a plurality of modules 110 aligned end-to-end. In such arrangements, the shelf edges 118 face into the aisles, through which customers in the retail environment as well as the apparatus 103 may travel. As will be apparent from FIG. 1, the term “shelf edge” 118 as employed herein, which may also be referred to as the edge of a support surface (e.g., the support surfaces 117) refers to a surface bounded by adjacent surfaces having different angles of inclination. In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the shelf edge 118-3 is at an angle of about ninety degrees relative to each of the support surface 117-3 and the underside (not shown) of the support surface 117-3. In other examples, the angles between the shelf edge 118-3 and the adjacent surfaces, such as the support surface 117-3, is more or less than ninety degrees.


The apparatus 103 is deployed within the retail environment, and communicates with the server 101 (e.g. via the link 107) to navigate, autonomously or partially autonomously, along a length 119 of at least a portion of the shelves 110. The apparatus 103, autonomously or in conjunction with the server 101, is configured to continuously determine its location within the environment, for example with respect to a map of the environment. The apparatus 103 may also be configured to update the map (e.g. via a simultaneous mapping and localization, or SLAM, process). As will be discussed in greater detail below, the apparatus 103 can be configured to employ a ray casting process for use in the above-mentioned localization and/or mapping functions.


The apparatus 103 is equipped with a plurality of navigation and data capture sensors 104, such as image sensors (e.g. one or more digital cameras) and depth sensors (e.g. one or more Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors, one or more depth cameras employing structured light patterns, such as infrared light, or the like). The apparatus 103 can be configured to employ the sensors 104 to both navigate among the shelves 110 (e.g. according to the paths mentioned above) and to capture shelf data during such navigation.


The server 101 includes a special purpose controller, such as a processor 120, specifically designed to control and/or assist the mobile automation apparatus 103 to navigate the environment and to capture data. The processor 120 can be further configured to obtain the captured data via a communications interface 124 for storage in a repository 132 and subsequent processing (e.g. to detect objects such as shelved products in the captured data, and detect status information corresponding to the objects). The server 101 may also be configured to transmit status notifications (e.g. notifications indicating that products are out-of-stock, low stock or misplaced) to the client device 105 responsive to the determination of product status data. The client device 105 includes one or more controllers (e.g. central processing units (CPUs) and/or field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and the like) configured to process (e.g. to display) notifications received from the server 101.


The processor 120 is interconnected with a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as the above-mentioned memory 122, having stored thereon computer readable instructions for performing various functionality, including control of the apparatus 103 to capture shelf data, post-processing of the shelf data, and generating and providing certain navigational data to the apparatus 103, such as target locations at which to capture shelf data. The memory 122 includes a combination of volatile (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory). The processor 120 and the memory 122 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. In some embodiments, the processor 120 is implemented as one or more central processing units (CPUs) and/or graphics processing units (GPUs).


The server 101 also includes the above-mentioned communications interface 124 interconnected with the processor 120. The communications interface 124 includes suitable hardware (e.g. transmitters, receivers, network interface controllers and the like) allowing the server 101 to communicate with other computing devices—particularly the apparatus 103, the client device 105 and the dock 108—via the links 107 and 109. The links 107 and 109 may be direct links, or links that traverse one or more networks, including both local and wide-area networks. The specific components of the communications interface 124 are selected based on the type of network or other links that the server 101 is required to communicate over. In the present example, as noted earlier, a wireless local-area network is implemented within the retail environment via the deployment of one or more wireless access points. The links 107 therefore include either or both wireless links between the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 105 and the above-mentioned access points, and a wired link (e.g. an Ethernet-based link) between the server 101 and the access point.


The memory 122 stores a plurality of applications, each including a plurality of computer readable instructions executable by the processor 120. The execution of the above-mentioned instructions by the processor 120 configures the server 101 to perform various actions discussed herein. The applications stored in the memory 122 include a control application 128, which may also be implemented as a suite of logically distinct applications. In general, via execution of the application 128 or subcomponents thereof and in conjunction with the other components of the server 101, the processor 120 is configured to implement various functionality related to controlling the apparatus 103 to navigate among the shelves 110 and capture data. The processor 120, as configured via the execution of the control application 128, is also referred to herein as the controller 120. As will now be apparent, some or all of the functionality implemented by the controller 120 described below may also be performed by preconfigured special purpose hardware controllers (e.g. one or more FPGAs and/or Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) configured for navigational computations) rather than by execution of the control application 128 by the processor 120.


Turning now to FIGS. 2A and 2B, the mobile automation apparatus 103 is shown in greater detail. The apparatus 103 includes a chassis 201 containing a locomotive mechanism 203 (e.g. one or more electrical motors driving wheels, tracks or the like). The apparatus 103 further includes a sensor mast 205 supported on the chassis 201 and, in the present example, extending upwards (e.g., substantially vertically) from the chassis 201. The mast 205 supports the sensors 104 mentioned earlier. In particular, the sensors 104 include at least one imaging sensor 207, such as a digital camera, as well as at least one depth sensor 209, such as a 3D digital camera. The apparatus 103 also includes additional depth sensors, such as LIDAR sensors 211. In other examples, the apparatus 103 includes additional sensors, such as one or more RFID readers, temperature sensors, and the like.


In the present example, the mast 205 supports seven digital cameras 207-1 through 207-7, and two LIDAR sensors 211-1 and 211-2. The mast 205 also supports a plurality of illumination assemblies 213, configured to illuminate the fields of view of the respective cameras 207. That is, the illumination assembly 213-1 illuminates the field of view of the camera 207-1, and so on. The sensors 207 and 211 are oriented on the mast 205 such that the fields of view of each sensor face a shelf 110 along the length 119 of which the apparatus 103 is travelling. The apparatus 103 is configured to track a location of the apparatus 103 (e.g. a location of the center of the chassis 201) in the common frame of reference 102 previously established in the retail facility, permitting data captured by the mobile automation apparatus 103 to be registered to the common frame of reference. The above-mentioned location of the apparatus 103 within the frame of reference 102, also referred to as localization, is employed in the generation of paths for execution by the apparatus 103.


The mobile automation apparatus 103 includes a special-purpose navigational controller, such as a processor 220, as shown in FIG. 2B, interconnected with a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a memory 222. The memory 222 includes a combination of volatile (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory). The processor 220 and the memory 222 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. The memory 222 stores computer readable instructions for execution by the processor 220. In particular, the memory 222 stores a navigation application 228 which, when executed by the processor 220, configures the processor 220 to perform various functions discussed below in greater detail and related to the navigation of the apparatus 103. The application 228 may also be implemented as a suite of distinct applications in other examples.


The processor 220, when so configured by the execution of the application 228, may also be referred to as a navigational controller 220. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the functionality implemented by the processor 220 via the execution of the application 228 may also be implemented by one or more specially designed hardware and firmware components, such as FPGAs, ASICs and the like in other embodiments.


The memory 222 may also store a repository 232 containing, for example, one or more maps representing the environment in which the apparatus 103 operates, for use during the execution of the application 228. The apparatus 103 may communicate with the server 101, for example to receive instructions to navigate to specified locations and initiate data capture operations, via a communications interface 224 over the link 107 shown in FIG. 1. The communications interface 224 also enables the apparatus 103 to communicate with the server 101 via the dock 108 and the link 109.


In the present example, the apparatus 103 is configured (via the execution of the application 228 by the processor 220) to perform localization and/or mapping functions, for example to determine a location of the apparatus 103 within the environment based on sensor data (e.g. data received from the LIDAR sensors 211). For example, the apparatus 103 may be configured to assess the likelihood that each of a plurality of candidate localizations within the map of the environment is correct. Such an assessment may be performed by comparing actual sensor data (e.g. LIDAR data) with expected sensor data (i.e. which obstacles from the map are expected to be represented in the sensor data if the candidate localization is correct). The expected sensor data noted above may be generated by generating a plurality of rays extending from the candidate localization in the map, to determine the distance of the nearest obstacle along each ray.


As will be apparent in the discussion below, other examples, some or all of the processing performed by the apparatus 103 may be performed by the server 101, and some or all of the processing performed by the server 101 may be performed by the apparatus 103. That is, although in the illustrated example the application 228 resides in the mobile automation apparatus 103, in other embodiments the actions performed by some or all of the components of the apparatus 103 may be performed by the processor 120 of the server 101, either in conjunction with or independently from the processor 220 of the mobile automation apparatus 103. As those of skill in the art will realize, distribution of navigational computations between the server 101 and the mobile automation apparatus 103 may depend upon respective processing speeds of the processors 120 and 220, the quality and bandwidth of the link 107, as well as criticality level of the underlying instruction(s).


Turning now to FIG. 2C, before describing the actions taken by the apparatus 103 to perform navigational ray casting, certain components of the application 228 will be described in greater detail. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in other examples the components of the application 228 may be separated into distinct applications, or combined into other sets of components. Some or all of the components illustrated in FIG. 2C may also be implemented as dedicated hardware components, such as one or more ASICs or FPGAs.


The application 228 includes a ray caster 250 configured to generate the above-mentioned rays to determine, for each ray, a distance along the ray from a candidate localization within the map to an obstacle within the map. The outcome of such ray casting (e.g. for a plurality of rays originating at the candidate localization) may be provided to a localizer 254. The localizer 254, in turn, is configured to determine a localization for the apparatus 103, for example among a plurality of candidate localizations, for use in subsequent functions, such as traveling along a path through the environment. The localizer 254 may implement, for example, a Kalman filter and/or other suitable localization algorithms, employing the data provided by the ray caster as an input.


The functionality of the application 228 will now be described in greater detail. In particular, the ray casting mechanism mentioned above will be described as performed by the apparatus 103. Turning to FIG. 3, a method 300 of navigational ray casting is shown. The method 300 will be described in conjunction with its performance by the apparatus 103, with reference to the components illustrated in FIGS. 2B and 2C.


At block 305, the apparatus 103, and particularly the ray caster 250, is configured to obtain a distance map of the environment in which the apparatus 103 is deployed, such as the facility containing the modules 110 shown in FIG. 1. The distance map contains a plurality of cells representing respective sub-regions of the environment. Each cell defines a minimum obstacle distance, indicating a distance from that cell (i.e. from the sub-region of the environment represented by the cell) to the nearest obstacle defined in the map.


The above-mentioned distance map can be obtained at block 305 by retrieving the distance map from the memory 222, for example from the repository 232 where the distance map was previously stored. In other examples, the distance map can be obtained at block 305 by requesting the distance map from the server 101, where the distance map is stored in the repository 132. The initial generation of the distance map, as well as any updating of the distance map (e.g. responsive to reconfiguration of the environment, such as movement of the shelf modules 110, addition of shelf modules 110, or the like) can be performed at either of the server 101 and the apparatus 103. In the present example, the distance map is generated from an occupancy map of the environment, as will be discussed below in connection with FIGS. 4A-4B and 5A-5B.



FIG. 4A illustrates an overhead view of an environment 400, for example including a room defined by a wall 404. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the environment 400 may be represented by an occupancy map, also referred to as an occupancy grid. FIG. 4B illustrates an example occupancy map 408 representing the environment 400 as a plurality of cells 412 each corresponding to a sub-region of the environment 400. The size of the sub-region represented by each cell may be selected based on the required capabilities of the system 100 and the desired navigational accuracy of the apparatus 103. For example, each sub-region may have dimensions of about 5 cm squared, although various other sub-region sizes are also contemplated.


Each cell in the occupancy map 408 has one of two values. In the present example, the cells 412 representing sub-regions where the wall 404 is present are illustrated as black, indicating the presence of an obstacle. The remaining cells, representing free space, are illustrated as white. A variety of other formats may be employed for the occupancy map, such as binary numerical values (e.g. zero for obstructed, space and one for free space, or vice versa), and the like.


Turning to FIG. 5A, a distance map 500 generated from the occupancy map is illustrated. The distance map includes a plurality of cells 504, examples of which are shown as a cell 504a and a cell 504b, each representing a sub-region of the environment 400. In particular, the cells 504 represent the same sub-regions as the occupancy map 408 (that is, the top-left cell 412 and the cell 504a, at the top-left of the distance map 500, both represent the same sub-region of the environment 400). In the distance map 500, however, each cell 504 contains a minimum obstacle distance rather than a simple indication of whether the cell itself is obstructed or not. The minimum obstacle distance, as noted earlier, is the distance from the cell 504 containing the minimum obstacle distance to the nearest obstructed cell 504. Thus, in the example shown in FIG. 5A, the cell 504a contains the distance from the cell 504a itself to the cell 504b (the nearest obstructed cell to the cell 504a). In the illustrated example, distances are represented in grayscale, with black (e.g. a value of zero) indicating a minimum obstacle distance of zero, meaning that the cell itself is obstructed, and lighter colors representing distances greater than zero. The minimum obstacle distances in the cells 504 may be stored as numerical values, such as distances in meters, inches or the like. In other examples, the minimum obstacle distances in the cells 504 may be encoded as grayscale values (e.g. from zero to 255, with steps between grayscale values corresponding to a predefined physical distance). A subset of minimum obstacle distances in the distance map 500, adjacent to the cells representing the wall 404, are illustrated as grayscale values as noted above.



FIG. 5B illustrates another example format for the storage of minimum obstacle distances in the distance map 500 (specifically, in a portion 508 of the distance map 500), in the form of physical distance values (e.g. in centimeters) rather than as grayscale values. The distances defined in each cell in FIG. 5B represent the distance, in centimeters, from the center of the cell to the center of the nearest cell having a minimum obstacle distance of zero (i.e. the nearest obstructed cell).


Returning to FIG. 3, having obtained the distance map at block 305, at block 310 the apparatus 103 is configured to select an origin cell in the distance map, and to set the origin cell as a current cell for use in subsequent steps of the ray casting process, as will be discussed below. The origin cell is a cell of the distance map corresponding to a localization of the apparatus 103, such as a candidate localization to be assessed in localizing the apparatus 103 within the environment. Turning to FIG. 6A, the distance map 500 is illustrated, with contents illustrated only for the cells 504 corresponding to obstructed sub-regions (i.e. with minimum obstacle distances of zero), to enhance visibility of the elements discussed below. As shown in FIG. 6A, an origin cell 504-o has been selected, for example corresponding to a candidate localization for the apparatus 103. The origin cell 504-o is also set as a current cell 504-c (i.e. at block 310, the origin cell and the current cell 504-o and 504-c are one and the same).


Referring again to FIG. 3, at block 315 the apparatus 103 (and in particular the ray caster 250) is configured to select the direction of the next ray to generate, originating from the origin cell 504-o selected at block 310. The apparatus 103 may be configured to generate a predefined number of rays from each origin cell (e.g. at angular increments of two degrees, for a total of 180 rays from the origin cell 504-o; a wide variety of other sets of rays may be predefined for generation, however). Thus, at block 315 the apparatus 103 is configured to select one of the predefined ray cast directions. Returning to FIG. 6A, a selected ray cast direction 600 extending from the origin cell 504-o is illustrated as a dashed line. The selected ray cast direction may be defined as an angle and a location (e.g. in the frame of reference 102) corresponding to the center of the origin cell 504-o.


Referring again to FIG. 3, at block 320 the apparatus 103 is configured to retrieve the minimum obstacle distance from the current cell 504-c (in this case, also the origin cell 504-o as noted above). As noted above, the minimum obstacle distance is defined by the cell itself (e.g. as a value stored in association with the cell). In the present example, the minimum obstacle distance defined by the cell 504-c is 39 cm, indicating that the nearest obstacle (more specifically, the nearest cell 504 having a minimum obstacle distance of zero) is 39 cm away from the cell 504-c.


Returning once again to FIG. 3, at block 325, the ray caster 250 is configured to select a test cell located at the minimum obstacle distance retrieved at block 320 from the current cell 504-c, in the ray casting direction selected at block 315. In other words, the apparatus 103 is not configured to query cells directly adjacent to the current cell 504-c, but rather to jump ahead along the selected ray casting direction 600 by the minimum obstacle distance of the current cell 504-c. Referring to FIG. 6B, a test cell 504-t is selected at the intersection of the ray casting direction 600 and the minimum obstacle distance of 39 cm (illustrated by a dashed circle with a radius of 39 cm centered at the origin cell 504-o). More specifically, in the present example the minimum obstacle distances correspond to the distances between the centers of cells 504. Therefore, at block 325 the test cell selected is a cell whose center is at or below the minimum obstacle distance, and through which the ray casting direction 600 passes.


Referring again to FIG. 3, at block 330 the ray caster 250 is configured to determine whether the test cell 504-t from block 325 indicates the presence of an obstacle. Specifically, the determination at block 330 is a determination of whether the minimum obstacle distance of the test cell 504-t is zero. If the determination at block 330 is negative (i.e. when the minimum obstacle distance of the test cell 504-t is not zero, indicating that the test cell 504-t represents an unobstructed sub-region of the environment 400), the performance of the method 300 proceeds to block 335.


At block 335, the ray caster 250 is configured to set the test cell 504-t as the current cell 504-c, and to then return to block 320. Referring to FIG. 7, the test cell 504-t has been set as the current cell 504-c (numbered 504-c2 for clarity). The performance of blocks 320 to 330 are then repeated. In the present example, the minimum obstacle distance defined by the current cell 504-c2 (previously the test cell 504-t) is 11.2 cm (e.g. see FIG. 5B). Thus, at block 325, a further test cell 504-t2 is selected at a distance of 11.2 cm along the ray casting direction 600 from the current cell 504-c2. The further test cell 504t-2, as shown in FIG. 7A. A further determination at block 330 is negative (the minimum obstacle distance of the test cell 504-t2 is 15.8 cm), and the performance of block 335 and blocks 320-330 is therefore repeated again, with the test cell 504-t2 being set as the current cell, and a new test cell being selected.



FIG. 7B illustrates the performance of several further performances of blocks 335 and 320-330, advancing the current cell 504-c through iterations 504-c3, 504-c4504-c10. At a further performance of block 325, a further test cell 504-t10 is selected. As is evident from FIG. 7B, the minimum obstacle distance defined by the test cell 504-t10 is zero, and the determination at block 330 is therefore affirmative. Returning to FIG. 3, the ray caster 250 therefore proceeds to block 340. At block 340, the ray caster determines a total distance between the final test cell 504-t10 and the origin cell 504-o, for return to another function executed by the apparatus 103, such as the above-mentioned localization filter. The total distance can be determined at block 340 accordingly various suitable mechanisms, as the dimensions of the cells 504 are known, and the positions of the origin cell 504-o and the final test cell 504-t10 are also known. In the example shown in FIG. 7B, the total distance is 162 cm. Thus, as will now be apparent, the distance from the origin cell 504-o to the first obstacle along the ray cast direction 600 is obtained by querying eleven cells, including the origin cell 504-o, even though the ray cast direction 600 traverses a significantly greater number of cells 504 (about 45 cells) before reaching the final test cell 504-t10.


Referring again to FIG. 3, at block 345 the ray caster 250 is configured to determine whether any ray casting directions remain to be assessed for the current origin cell 504-o. When the determination is affirmative, the above process is repeated for another ray cast direction, first resetting the origin cell as described in connection with block 310, and then selecting the next ray cast direction at block 315. When the determination is negative, the method 300 ends.


In further embodiments, such as those in which the apparatus 103 is deployed in a dynamic environment (containing moving obstacles), and/or in which the apparatus 103 is deployed to perform a SLAM process in which a map of the environment (and therefore the distance map 305) is generated substantially in real-time. In such embodiments, the performance of block 305 can be repeated to obtain an updated distance map, for example responsive to movement of an obstacle, detection of a new obstacle, or the like.


In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.


The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.


Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.


It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.


Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.


The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. A method of navigational ray casting in a computing device, comprising: obtaining a distance map having a plurality of cells representing respective sub-regions of an environment containing obstacles; wherein each cell defines a minimum obstacle distance indicating a distance from the corresponding sub-region to a nearest one of the obstacles;selecting an origin cell from the plurality of cells, and setting the origin cell as a current cell, the origin cell corresponding to a candidate localization of a mobile automation apparatus deployed in the environment;selecting a ray cast direction for a ray originating from the origin cell;retrieving the minimum obstacle distance defined by the current cell;selecting a test cell at the minimum obstacle distance from the current cell in the ray cast direction;determining whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles;when the determination is affirmative, determining a total distance between the origin cell and the test cell;capturing, via a sensor of the mobile automation apparatus, sensor data indicating an actual distance; andproviding the actual distance and the total distance to a localization filter to determine a further candidate localization.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: when the determination is negative, setting the test cell as the current cell; andrepeating retrieving the minimum obstacle distance, selecting a test cell, and determining whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the cells defines the minimum obstacle distance as a physical distance value.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the cells defines the minimum obstacle distance as an intensity value.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: responsive to determining the total distance, determining whether further ray cast directions remain to be processed; andwhen further ray casting directions remain to be processed, repeating the selecting a ray cast direction, retrieving the minimum obstacle distance, selecting the test cell, and determining whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing the total distance as an input to a localization filter.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the distance map includes retrieving the distance map from a memory of the computing device.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the distance map includes requesting the distance map from a server.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the distance map includes: retrieving an occupancy map having a plurality of occupancy map cells representing the sub-regions; wherein each occupancy map cell defines whether the corresponding sub-region is obstructed or free; andgenerating the distance map from the occupancy map.
  • 10. A mobile automation apparatus, comprising: a sensor;a memory storing a distance map having a plurality of cells representing respective sub-regions of an environment containing obstacles; wherein each cell defines a minimum obstacle distance indicating a distance from the corresponding sub-region to a nearest one of the obstacles; anda navigational controller connected to the memory and configured to: retrieve the distance map from the memory;select an origin cell from the plurality of cells, and setting the origin cell as a current cell, the origin cell corresponding to a candidate localization of the mobile automation apparatus in the environment;select a ray cast direction for a ray originating from the origin cell;retrieve the minimum obstacle distance defined by the current cell;select a test cell at the minimum obstacle distance from the current cell in the ray cast direction;determine whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles;when the determination is affirmative, determine a total distance between the origin cell and the test cell; capture, via the sensor, sensor data indicating an actual distance; andprovide the actual distance and the total distance to a localization filter to determine a further candidate localization.
  • 11. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 10, wherein the navigational controller is further configured to: when the determination is negative, set the test cell as the current cell; andrepeat retrieval of the minimum obstacle distance, selection of a test cell, and determination of whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles.
  • 12. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 10, wherein each of the cells defines the minimum obstacle distance as a physical distance value.
  • 13. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 10, wherein each of the cells defines the minimum obstacle distance as an intensity value.
  • 14. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 10, wherein the navigational controller is further configured to: responsive to a determination of the total distance, determine whether further ray cast directions remain to be processed; andwhen further ray casting directions remain to be processed, repeat the selection of a ray cast direction, retrieval of the minimum obstacle distance, selection of the test cell, and determination of whether the test cell indicates the presence of one of the obstacles.
  • 15. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 10, wherein the navigational controller is further configured to provide the total distance as an input to a localization filter.
  • 16. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 10, wherein the navigational controller is further configured, prior to storing the distance map in the memory, to generate the distance map.
  • 17. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 16, wherein the navigational controller is configured, to generate the distance map, to: retrieving an occupancy map having a plurality of occupancy map cells representing the sub-regions; wherein each occupancy map cell defines whether the corresponding sub-region is obstructed or free; andgenerating the distance map from the occupancy map.
  • 18. The mobile automation apparatus of claim 10, further comprising a communication interface; wherein the navigational controller is further configured, prior to storing the distance map in the memory, to request the distance map from a server via the communication interface.
US Referenced Citations (481)
Number Name Date Kind
5209712 Ferri May 1993 A
5214615 Bauer May 1993 A
5408322 Hsu et al. Apr 1995 A
5414268 McGee May 1995 A
5423617 Marsh et al. Jun 1995 A
5534762 Kim Jul 1996 A
5566280 Fukui et al. Oct 1996 A
5704049 Briechle Dec 1997 A
5953055 Huang et al. Sep 1999 A
5988862 Kacyra et al. Nov 1999 A
6026376 Kenney Feb 2000 A
6034379 Bunte et al. Mar 2000 A
6075905 Herman et al. Jun 2000 A
6115114 Berg et al. Sep 2000 A
6141293 Amorai-Moriya et al. Oct 2000 A
6304855 Burke Oct 2001 B1
6442507 Skidmore et al. Aug 2002 B1
6549825 Kurata Apr 2003 B2
6580441 Schileru-Key Jun 2003 B2
6711293 Lowe Mar 2004 B1
6721723 Gibson et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721769 Rappaport et al. Apr 2004 B1
6836567 Silver et al. Dec 2004 B1
6995762 Pavlidis et al. Feb 2006 B1
7090135 Patel Aug 2006 B2
7137207 Armstrong et al. Nov 2006 B2
7245558 Willins et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248754 Cato Jul 2007 B2
7277187 Smith et al. Oct 2007 B2
7373722 Cooper et al. May 2008 B2
7474389 Greenberg et al. Jan 2009 B2
7487595 Armstrong et al. Feb 2009 B2
7493336 Noonan Feb 2009 B2
7508794 Feather et al. Mar 2009 B2
7527205 Zhu et al. May 2009 B2
7605817 Zhang et al. Oct 2009 B2
7647752 Magnell Jan 2010 B2
7693757 Zimmerman Apr 2010 B2
7726575 Wang et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751928 Antony et al. Jul 2010 B1
7783383 Eliuk et al. Aug 2010 B2
7839531 Sugiyama Nov 2010 B2
7845560 Emanuel et al. Dec 2010 B2
7885865 Benson et al. Feb 2011 B2
7925114 Mai et al. Apr 2011 B2
7957998 Riley et al. Jun 2011 B2
7996179 Lee et al. Aug 2011 B2
8009864 Linaker et al. Aug 2011 B2
8049621 Egan Nov 2011 B1
8091782 Cato et al. Jan 2012 B2
8094902 Crandall et al. Jan 2012 B2
8094937 Teoh et al. Jan 2012 B2
8132728 Dwinell et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134717 Pangrazio et al. Mar 2012 B2
8189855 Opalach et al. May 2012 B2
8199977 Krishnaswamy et al. Jun 2012 B2
8207964 Meadow et al. Jun 2012 B1
8233055 Matsunaga et al. Jul 2012 B2
8260742 Cognigni et al. Sep 2012 B2
8265895 Willins et al. Sep 2012 B2
8277396 Scott et al. Oct 2012 B2
8284988 Sones et al. Oct 2012 B2
8423431 Rouaix et al. Apr 2013 B1
8429004 Hamilton et al. Apr 2013 B2
8463079 Ackley et al. Jun 2013 B2
8479996 Barkan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8520067 Ersue Aug 2013 B2
8542252 Perez et al. Sep 2013 B2
8571314 Tao et al. Oct 2013 B2
8599303 Stettner Dec 2013 B2
8630924 Groenevelt et al. Jan 2014 B2
8660338 Ma et al. Feb 2014 B2
8743176 Stettner et al. Jun 2014 B2
8757479 Clark et al. Jun 2014 B2
8812226 Zeng Aug 2014 B2
8923893 Austin et al. Dec 2014 B2
8939369 Olmstead et al. Jan 2015 B2
8954188 Sullivan et al. Feb 2015 B2
8958911 Wong et al. Feb 2015 B2
8971637 Rivard Mar 2015 B1
8989342 Liesenfelt et al. Mar 2015 B2
9007601 Steffey et al. Apr 2015 B2
9037287 Grauberger et al. May 2015 B1
9064394 Trundle Jun 2015 B1
9070285 Ramu et al. Jun 2015 B1
9072929 Rush et al. Jul 2015 B1
9120622 Elazary et al. Sep 2015 B1
9129277 Macintosh Sep 2015 B2
9135491 Morandi et al. Sep 2015 B2
9159047 Winkel Oct 2015 B2
9171442 Clements Oct 2015 B2
9247211 Zhang et al. Jan 2016 B2
9329269 Zeng May 2016 B2
9349076 Liu et al. May 2016 B1
9367831 Besehanic Jun 2016 B1
9380222 Clayton et al. Jun 2016 B2
9396554 Williams et al. Jul 2016 B2
9400170 Steffey Jul 2016 B2
9424482 Patel et al. Aug 2016 B2
9517767 Kentley et al. Dec 2016 B1
9542746 Wu et al. Jan 2017 B2
9549125 Goyal et al. Jan 2017 B1
9562971 Shenkar et al. Feb 2017 B2
9565400 Curlander et al. Feb 2017 B1
9589353 Mueller-Fischer et al. Mar 2017 B2
9600731 Yasunaga et al. Mar 2017 B2
9600892 Patel et al. Mar 2017 B2
9612123 Levinson et al. Apr 2017 B1
9639935 Douady-Pleven et al. May 2017 B1
9697429 Patel et al. Jul 2017 B2
9766074 Roumeliotis et al. Sep 2017 B2
9778388 Connor Oct 2017 B1
9779205 Namir Oct 2017 B2
9791862 Connor Oct 2017 B1
9805240 Zheng et al. Oct 2017 B1
9811754 Schwartz Nov 2017 B2
9827683 Hance et al. Nov 2017 B1
9880009 Bell Jan 2018 B2
9928708 Lin et al. Mar 2018 B2
9953420 Wolski et al. Apr 2018 B2
9980009 Jiang et al. May 2018 B2
9994339 Colson et al. Jun 2018 B2
9996818 Ren et al. Jun 2018 B1
10019803 Venable et al. Jul 2018 B2
10111646 Nycz et al. Oct 2018 B2
10121072 Kekatpure Nov 2018 B1
10127438 Fisher et al. Nov 2018 B1
10133951 Mendonca et al. Nov 2018 B1
10197400 Jesudason et al. Feb 2019 B2
10210603 Venable et al. Feb 2019 B2
10229386 Thomas Mar 2019 B2
10248653 Blassin et al. Apr 2019 B2
10262294 Hahn et al. Apr 2019 B1
10265871 Hance et al. Apr 2019 B2
10289990 Rizzolo et al. May 2019 B2
10336543 Sills et al. Jul 2019 B1
10349031 DeLuca Jul 2019 B2
10352689 Brown et al. Jul 2019 B2
10373116 Medina et al. Aug 2019 B2
10394244 Song et al. Aug 2019 B2
20010031069 Kondo et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010041948 Ross et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020006231 Jayant et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020059202 Hadzikadic et al. May 2002 A1
20020097439 Braica Jul 2002 A1
20020146170 Rom Oct 2002 A1
20020158453 Levine Oct 2002 A1
20020164236 Fukuhara et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030003925 Suzuki Jan 2003 A1
20030094494 Blanford et al. May 2003 A1
20030174891 Wenzel et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040021313 Gardner et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040084527 Bong et al. May 2004 A1
20040131278 Imagawa et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040240754 Smith et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050016004 Armstrong et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050114059 Chang et al. May 2005 A1
20050128195 Houston Jun 2005 A1
20050174351 Chang Aug 2005 A1
20050213082 DiBernardo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213109 Schell et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060032915 Schwartz Feb 2006 A1
20060045325 Zavadsky et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064286 Fink et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060106742 Bochicchio et al. May 2006 A1
20060279527 Zehner et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285486 Roberts et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070036398 Chen Feb 2007 A1
20070074410 Armstrong et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070272732 Hindmon Nov 2007 A1
20080002866 Fujiwara Jan 2008 A1
20080025565 Zhang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027591 Lenser et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080077511 Zimmerman Mar 2008 A1
20080159634 Sharma et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080164310 Dupuy et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175513 Lai et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181529 Michel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183730 Enga Jul 2008 A1
20080238919 Pack Oct 2008 A1
20080294487 Nasser Nov 2008 A1
20090009123 Skaff Jan 2009 A1
20090024353 Lee et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090057411 Madej et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090059270 Opalach et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090060349 Linaker et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090063306 Fano et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090063307 Groenovelt et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090074303 Filimonova et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088975 Sato et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103773 Wheeler et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125350 Lessing et al. May 2009 A1
20090125535 Basso et al. May 2009 A1
20090152391 McWhirk Jun 2009 A1
20090160975 Kwan Jun 2009 A1
20090192921 Hicks Jul 2009 A1
20090206161 Olmstead Aug 2009 A1
20090236155 Skaff Sep 2009 A1
20090252437 Li et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287587 Bloebaum et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090323121 Valkenburg et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100017407 Beniyama et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026804 Tanizaki et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070365 Siotia et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082194 Yabushita et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100091094 Sekowski Apr 2010 A1
20100118116 Tomasz et al. May 2010 A1
20100131234 Stewart et al. May 2010 A1
20100141806 Uemura et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161569 Schreter Jun 2010 A1
20100171826 Hamilton et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100208039 Setettner Aug 2010 A1
20100214873 Somasundaram et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100235033 Yamamoto et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241289 Sandberg Sep 2010 A1
20100257149 Cognigni et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100295850 Katz et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100315412 Sinha et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100326939 Clark et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110047636 Stachon et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110052043 Hyung et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110093306 Nielsen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110137527 Simon et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168774 Magal Jul 2011 A1
20110172875 Gibbs Jul 2011 A1
20110188759 Filimonova et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110216063 Hayes Sep 2011 A1
20110242286 Pace et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110246503 Bender et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110254840 Halstead Oct 2011 A1
20110286007 Pangrazio et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110288816 Thierman Nov 2011 A1
20110310088 Adabala et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120017028 Tsirkin Jan 2012 A1
20120019393 Wolinsky et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120022913 VolKmann et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120051730 Cote et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120069051 Hagbi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120075342 Choubassi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120133639 Kopf et al. May 2012 A1
20120307108 Forutanpour Jun 2012 A1
20120169530 Padmanabhan et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179621 Moir et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185112 Sung et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120194644 Newcombe et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120197464 Wang et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120201466 Funayama et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120209553 Doytchinov et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120236119 Rhee et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120249802 Taylor Oct 2012 A1
20120250978 Taylor Oct 2012 A1
20120269383 Bobbitt et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120278782 Pal Nov 2012 A1
20120287249 Choo et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120323620 Hofman et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130030700 Miller et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130076586 Karhuketo et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130090881 Janardhanan et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130119138 Winkel May 2013 A1
20130132913 Fu et al. May 2013 A1
20130134178 Lu May 2013 A1
20130138246 Gutmann et al. May 2013 A1
20130138534 Herwig May 2013 A1
20130142421 Silver et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130144565 Miller Jun 2013 A1
20130154802 O'Haire et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130156292 Chang et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130162806 Ding et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130169681 Rasane et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130176398 Bonner et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130178227 Vartanian et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130182114 Zhang et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130226344 Wong et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130228620 Ahem et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130232039 Jackson et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130235165 Gharib et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130235206 Smith et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130236089 Litvak et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130278631 Border et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130299306 Jiang et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130299313 Baek, IV et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130300729 Grimaud Nov 2013 A1
20130303193 Dharwada et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130321418 Kirk Dec 2013 A1
20130329013 Metois et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130341400 Lancaster-Larocque Dec 2013 A1
20130342363 Paek et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140002597 Taguchi et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140003655 Gopalkrishnan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140003727 Lortz et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140006229 Birch et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140016832 Kong et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019311 Tanaka Jan 2014 A1
20140025201 Ryu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140028837 Gao et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140047342 Breternitz et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140049616 Stettner Feb 2014 A1
20140052555 MacIntosh Feb 2014 A1
20140086483 Zhang et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140098094 Neumann et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140100813 Shaowering Apr 2014 A1
20140104413 McCloskey et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140112537 Frank et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140129027 Schnittman May 2014 A1
20140156133 Cullinane et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140161359 Magri et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140192050 Qiu et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140195095 Flohr et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140195374 Bassemir et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140214547 Signorelli et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140214600 Argue et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140267614 Ding et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267688 Aich et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277691 Jacobus et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277692 Buzan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279294 Field-Darragh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140300637 Fan et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140316875 Tkachenko et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140330835 Boyer Nov 2014 A1
20140344401 Varney et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140351073 Murphy et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140369607 Patel et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150015602 Beaudoin Jan 2015 A1
20150019391 Kumar et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150029339 Kobres et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150032304 Nakamura et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150039458 Reid Feb 2015 A1
20150052029 Wu et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150088618 Basir et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088701 Desmarais et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088703 Yan Mar 2015 A1
20150092066 Geiss et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106403 Haverinen et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117788 Patel et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150139010 Jeong et al. May 2015 A1
20150154467 Feng et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150161793 Takahashi Jun 2015 A1
20150170256 Pettyjohn et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150181198 Baele et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150212521 Pack et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150235157 Avegliano et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150245358 Schmidt Aug 2015 A1
20150262116 Katircioglu et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150279035 Wolski et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150298317 Wang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310601 Rodriguez et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150332368 Vartiainen et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150352721 Wicks et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150353280 Brazeau et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150355639 Versteeg et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150363625 Wu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150363758 Wu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150365660 Wu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150379704 Chandrasekar et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160026253 Bradski et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160042223 Suh et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160044862 Kocer Feb 2016 A1
20160061591 Pangrazio et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160070981 Sasaki et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160092943 Vigier et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160012588 Taguchi et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160104041 Bowers et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160107690 Oyama et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160112628 Super et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160114488 Mascorro Medina et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160129592 Saboo et al. May 2016 A1
20160132815 Itoko et al. May 2016 A1
20160150217 Popov May 2016 A1
20160156898 Ren et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160163067 Williams et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160171336 Schwartz Jun 2016 A1
20160171429 Schwartz Jun 2016 A1
20160171707 Schwartz Jun 2016 A1
20160185347 Lefevre et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191759 Somanath et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160224927 Pettersson Aug 2016 A1
20160253735 Scudillo et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160253844 Petrovskaya et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160259329 High et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160260051 Wu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160260054 High et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160271795 Vicenti Sep 2016 A1
20160290805 Irish Oct 2016 A1
20160313133 Zeng et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160328618 Patel et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160328767 Bonner et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160353099 Thomson et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160364634 Davis et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170004649 Collet Romea et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170011281 Dijkman et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170011308 Sun et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032311 Rizzolo et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170041553 Cao et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170054965 Raab et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170066459 Singh Mar 2017 A1
20170074659 Giurgiu et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170083774 Solar et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170109940 Guo et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170147966 Aversa et al. May 2017 A1
20170150129 Pangrazio May 2017 A1
20170178060 Schwartz Jun 2017 A1
20170178227 Gornish Jun 2017 A1
20170178310 Gornish Jun 2017 A1
20170193434 Shah et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170219338 Brown et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170219353 Alesiani Aug 2017 A1
20170227645 Swope et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170227647 Baik Aug 2017 A1
20170228885 Baumgartner Aug 2017 A1
20170261993 Venable et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262724 Wu et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170280125 Brown et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170286773 Skaff et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170286901 Skaff et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170297478 Sherman et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170323253 Enssle et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170323376 Glaser et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170337508 Bogolea et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180001481 Shah et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180005035 Bogolea et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180005176 Williams et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180020145 Kotfis et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180051991 Hong Feb 2018 A1
20180053091 Savvides et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180053305 Gu et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180075403 Mascorro Medina et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180089613 Chen et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180101813 Paat et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180108120 Venable et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180108134 Venable et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180114183 Howell Apr 2018 A1
20180129201 Douglas et al. May 2018 A1
20180130011 Jacobsson May 2018 A1
20180143003 Clayton et al. May 2018 A1
20180174325 Fu et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180190160 Bryan et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180197139 Hill Jul 2018 A1
20180201423 Drzewiecki et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180204111 Zadeh et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180218218 Madan et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180251253 Taira et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180276596 Murthy et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180281191 Sinyayskiy et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180293442 Fridental et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180293543 Tiwari Oct 2018 A1
20180306958 Goss et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180313956 Rzeszutek et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180314260 Jen et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180314908 Lam Nov 2018 A1
20180315007 Kingsford et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180315065 Zhang et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180315173 Phan et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180315865 Haist et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180321692 Castillo-Effen et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180370727 Hance et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190025838 Artes Jan 2019 A1
20190049962 Ouellette et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190057588 Savvides et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190065861 Savvides et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190073554 Rzeszutek Mar 2019 A1
20190073559 Rzeszutek et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190073627 Nakdimon et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190077015 Shibasaki et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190087663 Yamazaki et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190094876 Moore et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190108606 Komiyama Apr 2019 A1
20190160675 Paschall, II et al. May 2019 A1
20190178436 Mao et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190180150 Taylor et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190197439 Wang Jun 2019 A1
20190197728 Yamao Jun 2019 A1
20190236530 Cantrell et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190271984 Kingsford Sep 2019 A1
20190304132 Yoda et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190392212 Sawhney et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200049511 Sithiravel Feb 2020 A1
20200053325 Deyle et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200111267 Stauber Apr 2020 A1
20200192388 Zhang Jun 2020 A1
20200314333 Liang et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200341151 Yoshida Oct 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
2835830 Nov 2012 CA
3028156 Jan 2018 CA
102214343 Oct 2011 CN
104200086 Dec 2014 CN
105989512 Oct 2016 CN
107067382 Aug 2017 CN
206952978 Feb 2018 CN
766098 Apr 1997 EP
1311993 May 2007 EP
2309378 Apr 2011 EP
2439487 Apr 2012 EP
2472475 Jul 2012 EP
2562688 Feb 2013 EP
2662831 Nov 2013 EP
2693362 Feb 2014 EP
3400113 Nov 2018 EP
3001567 Aug 2014 FR
2323238 Sep 1998 GB
2330265 Apr 1999 GB
2014170431 Sep 2014 JP
2016194834 Nov 2016 JP
2017016539 Jan 2017 JP
101234798 Jan 2009 KR
1020190031431 Mar 2019 KR
WO 9923600 May 1999 WO
WO 2003002935 Jan 2003 WO
WO 2003025805 Mar 2003 WO
WO 2006136958 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007042251 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2008057504 May 2008 WO
WO 2008154611 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2012103199 Aug 2012 WO
WO 2012103202 Aug 2012 WO
WO 2012154801 Nov 2012 WO
WO 2013165674 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014066422 May 2014 WO
WO 2014092552 Jun 2014 WO
WO 2014181323 Nov 2014 WO
WO 2015127503 Sep 2015 WO
WO 2016020038 Feb 2016 WO
WO 2017175312 Oct 2017 WO
WO 2017187106 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2018018007 Jan 2018 WO
WO 2018204308 Nov 2018 WO
WO 2018204342 Nov 2018 WO
WO 2019023249 Jan 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (105)
Entry
Castorena et al., “Autocalibration of lidar and optical cameras via edge alignment”, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Mar. 20, 2016).
Chen et al. “Improving Octree-Based Occupancy Maps Using Environment Sparsity with Application to Aerial Robot Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, pp. 3656-3663, 2017.
Cleveland Jonas et al: “Automated System for Semantic Object Labeling with Soft-Object Recognition and Dynamic Programming Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY (Apr. 1, 2017).
Cook et al., “Distributed Ray Tracing” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 18, No. 3, ACM pp. 137-145, 1984.
Datta, A., et al. “Accurate camera calibration using iterative refinement of control points,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009.
Deschaud, et al., “A Fast and Accurate Place Detection algoritm for large noisy point clouds using filtered normals and voxel growing,” 3DPVT, May 2010, Paris, France.
Douillard, Bertrand, et al. “On the segmentation of 3D Lidar point clouds.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2011.
Dubois, M., et al., “A comparison of geometric and energy-based point cloud semantic segmentation methods,” European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), p. 88-93, Sep. 25-27, 2013.
Duda, et al., “Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures”, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, Graphics and Image Processing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan. 1972).
F.C.A. Groen et al., “The smallest box around a package,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 14, No. 1-6, Jan. 1, 1981, pp. 173-176, XP055237156, GB, ISSN: 0031-3203, DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(81(90059-5 p. 176-p. 178.
Federico Tombari et al. “Multimodal cue integration through Hypotheses Verification for RGB-D object recognition and 6DOF pose estimation”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jan. 2013.
Flores, et al., “Removing Pedestrians from Google Street View Images”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference On, IEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 53-58 (Jun. 13, 2010).
Glassner, “Space Subdivision for Fast Ray Tracing.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4.10, pp. 15-24, 1984.
Golovinskiy, Aleksey, et al. “Min-Cut based segmentation of point clouds.” Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2009.
Hackel et al., “Contour Detection in unstructured 3D point clouds,” IEEE, 2016 Conference on Computer vision and Pattern recognition (CVPR), Jun. 27-30, 2016, pp. 1-9.
Hao et al., “Structure-based object detection from scene point clouds,” Science Direct, V191, pp. 148-160 (2016).
Hu et al., “An improved method of discrete point cloud filtering based on complex environment,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, v48, i18 (2013).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/070996 dated Apr. 2, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053212 dated Dec. 1, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/064110 dated Mar. 20, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/024847 dated Jul. 7, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2017/083143 dated Feb. 11, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/030419 dated Aug. 31, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030345 dated Sep. 17, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030360 dated Jul. 9, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030363 dated Jul. 9, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/025859 dated Jul. 3, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/025849 dated Jul. 9, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/049761 dated Nov. 15, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/051312 dated Nov. 15, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/054103 dated Jan. 6, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/064020 dated Feb. 19, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/027948 dated Jul. 16, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028133 dated Jul. 24, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/029134 dated Jul. 27, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028183 dated Jul. 24, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/035285 dated Aug. 27, 2020.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/024805 dated Aug. 2, 2021.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/057388 dated Feb. 2, 2022.
Jadhav et al. “Survey on Spatial Domain dynamic template matching technique for scanning linear barcode,” International Journal of science and research v 5 n 3, Mar. 2016)(Year: 2016).
Jian Fan et al.: “Shelf detection via vanishing point and radial projection”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on image processing (ICIP), IEEE, (Oct. 27, 2014), pp. 1575-1578.
Kaikai Liu et al., “Enabling Context-Aware Indoor Augmented Reality via Smartphone Sensing and Vision Tracking”, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications, Association for Computer Machinery, US, vol. 12, No.
Kang et al., “Kinematic Path-Tracking of Mobile Robot Using Iterative learning Control”, Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, pp. 111-121.
Kay et al. “Ray Tracing Complex Scenes.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 20, No. 4, ACM, pp. 269-278, 1986.
Kelly et al., “Reactive Nonholonomic Trajectory Generation via Parametric Optimal Control”, International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 22, No. 7-8, pp. 583-601 (Jul. 30, 2013).
Lari, Z., et al., “An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud.” International Archives of the Photogrammertry, Remote sensing and spatial information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, 2011, ISPRS Calgary 2011 Workshop, Aug. 29-31, 2011, Calgary, Canada.
Lecking et al.: “Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features”, IEEE, pp. 333-337 (Sep. 15, 2008).
Lee et al. “Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 19, No. 3, ACM, pp. 61-67, 1985.
Li et al., “An improved RANSAC for 3D Point cloud plane segmentation based on normal distribution transformation cells,” Remote sensing, V9: 433, pp. 1-16 (2017).
Likhachev, Maxim, and Dave Ferguson. “Planning Long dynamically feasible maneuvers for autonomous vehicles.” The international journal of Robotics Reasearch 28.8 (2009): 933-945. (Year:2009).
Marder-Eppstein et al., “The Office Marathon: robust navigation in an indoor office environment,” IEEE, 2010 International conference on robotics and automation, May 3-7, 2010, pp. 300-307.
McNaughton, Matthew, et al. “Motion planning for autonomous driving with a conformal spatiotemporal lattice.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. (Year: 2011).
Meyersohn, “Walmart turns to robots and apps in stores”, https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/07/business/walmart-robot-janitors-dotcom-store/index.html, Oct. 29, 2019.
Mitra et al., “Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data,” International Journal of Computational geometry & applications, Jun. 8-10, 2003, pp. 322-328.
N.D.F. Campbell et al. “Automatic 3D Object Segmentation in Multiple Views using Volumetric Graph-Cuts”, Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 14-25.
Ni et al., “Edge Detection and Feature Line Tracing in 3D-Point Clouds by Analyzing Geometric Properties of Neighborhoods,” Remote Sensing, V8 I9, pp. 1-20 (2016).
Norriof et al., “Experimental comparison of some classical iterative learning control algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 2002, pp. 636-641.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,175 dated Sep. 23, 2014.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,503 dated Mar. 11, 2016.
“Fair Billing with Automatic Dimensioning” pp. 1-4, undated, Copyright Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
“Plane Detection in Point Cloud Data” dated Jan. 25, 2010 by Michael Ying Yang and Wolfgang Forstner, Technical Report 1, 2010, University of Bonn.
“Swift Dimension” Trademark Omniplanar, Copyright 2014.
Ajmal S. Mian et al., “Three-Dimensional Model Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Cluttered Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006.
Batalin et al., “Mobile robot navigation using a sensor network,” IEEE, International Conference on robotics and automation, Apr. 26, May 1, 2004, pp. 636-641.
Bazazian et al., “Fast and Robust Edge Extraction in Unorganized Point clouds,” IEEE, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applicatoins (DICTA), Nov. 23-25, 2015, pp. 1-8.
Biswas et al. “Depth Camera Based Indoor Mobile Robot Localization and Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2012.
Bohm, Multi-Image Fusion for Occlusion-Free Façade Texturing, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 867-872 (Jan. 2004).
Bristow et al., “A Survey of Iterative Learning Control”, IEEE Control Systems, Jun. 2006, pp. 96-114.
Buenaposada et al. “Realtime tracking and estimation of plane pose” Proceedings of the ICPR (Aug. 2002) vol. II, IEEE pp. 697-700.
Carreira et al., “Enhanced PCA-based localization using depth maps with missing data,” IEEE, pp. 1-8, Apr. 24, 2013.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,495 dated Apr. 25, 2016.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/518,091 dated Apr. 12, 2017.
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,103 dated Apr. 5, 2017.
Olson, Clark F., et al. “Wide-Baseline Stereo Vision for terrain Mapping” in Machine Vision and Applications, Aug. 2010.
Oriolo et al., “An iterative learning controller for nonholonomic mobile Robots”, the international Journal of Robotics Research, Aug. 1997, pp. 954-970.
Ostafew et al., “Visual Teach and Repeat, Repeat, Repeat: Iterative learning control to improve mobile robot path tracking in challenging outdoor environment”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and Systems, Nov. 2013, p. 176.
Park et al., “Autonomous mobile robot navigation using passive rfid in indoor environment,” IEEE, Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 56, issue 7, pp. 2366-2373 (Jul. 2009).
Perveen et al. (An overview of template matching methodologies and its application, International Journal of Research in Computer and Communication Technology, v2n10, Oct. 2013) (Year: 2013).
Pivtoraiko et al., “Differentially constrained mobile robot motion planning in state lattices”, journal of field robotics, vol. 26, No. 3, 2009, pp. 308-333.
Pratt W K Ed: “Digital Image processing, 10-image enhancement, 17-image segmentation”, Jan. 1, 2001, Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside, New York: John Wily & Sons, US, pp. 243-258, 551.
Puwein, J., et al.“Robust Multi-view camera calibration for wide-baseline camera networks,” in IEEE Workshop on Applications of computer vision (WACV), Jan. 2011.
Rusu, et al. “How to incrementally register pairs of clouds,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 22, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pairwise_incremental_registration.php.
Rusu, et al. “Spatial Change detection on unorganized point cloud data,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 19, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/octree_change.php].
Schnabel et al. “Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection”, vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-12 (1981).
Senthilkumaran, et al., “Edge Detection Techniques for Image Segmentation—A Survey of Soft Computing Approaches”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol. 1, No. 2 (May 2009).
Szeliski, “Modified Hough Transform”, Computer Vision. Copyright 2011, pp. 251-254. Retrieved on Aug. 17, 2017 [http://szeliski.org/book/drafts/SzeliskiBook_20100903_draft.pdf].
Tahir, Rabbani, et al., “Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint,” International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36.5 (Sep. 2006): 248-253.
Trevor et al., “Tables, Counters, and Shelves: Semantic Mapping of Surfaces in 3D,” Retrieved from Internet Jul. 3, 2018 @ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.703.5365&rep=rep1&type=p.
Tseng, et al., “A Cloud Removal Approach for Aerial Image Visualization”, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 2421-2440 (Jun. 2013).
Uchiyama, et al., “Removal of Moving Objects from a Street-View Image by Fusing Multiple Image Sequences”, Pattern Recognition, 2010, 20th International Conference On, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ pp. 3456-3459 (Aug. 23, 2010).
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report” for GB Patent Application No. 1813580.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1521272.3.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Mar. 11, 2015 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated May 13, 2020 for GB Patent Application No. 1917864.9.
Varol Gul et al.: “Product placement detection based on image processing”, 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communication Applications Conference (SIU), IEEE, Apr. 23, 2014.
Varol Gul et al.: “Toward Retail product recognition on Grocery shelves”, Visual Communications and image processing; Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, (Mar. 4, 2015).
Weber et al., “Methods for Feature Detection in Point clouds,” visualization of large and unstructured data sets—IRTG Workshop, pp. 90-99 (2010).
Zhao Zhou et al.: “An Image contrast Enhancement Algorithm Using PLIP-based histogram Modification”, 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (Cybcon), IEEE, (Jun. 21, 2017).
Ziang Xie et al., “Multimodal Blending for High-Accuracy Instance Recognition”, 2013 IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 2214-2221.
Fan Zhang et al., “Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, 2014 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 4321-4328.
Kaimo Lin et al., “SEAGULL: Seam-guided Local Alignment for Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, Retrieved on Nov. 16, 2020 [http://publish.illinois.edu/visual-modeling-and-analytics/files/2016/08/Seagull.pdf].
Julio Zaragoza et al., “As-Projective-As-Possible Image Stitching with Moving DLT”, 2013 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 2339-2346.
Zeng et al., Multi-view Self Supervised Deep Learning for 6D Pose Estimation in the Amazon Picking Challenge, May 7, 2017. Retrieved on Nov. 16, 2019 [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.09475.pdf].
Zhang et al., “Mobile computing and industrial augmented reality for real-time data access”, Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2001, 8th IEEE International Conference on Oct. 15-18, 2001, pp. 583-588, vol. 2.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200183408 A1 Jun 2020 US