Patent Grant
9365908
The present invention relates generally to systems and methods of surface enhancement, and more particularly, to systems and methods of surface enhancement by liquid cavitation jet action on or near a material to be processed (“target material”).
The following description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.
The most common method of surface enhancement is shot peening, where small particles or balls (shot) are impacted against the target material to deform the surface. The shot is typically propelled with compressed air using automated equipment to move the peening nozzle over the surface of the part to be peened. The shot, frequently steel or ceramic, is usually accelerated to 50-100 m/s by the compressed air and strikes the surface with enough energy to deform the top layer of material beyond its elastic limit.
This plastically deformed surface induces residual compressive stresses in the material as the material underneath, which is not plastically deformed, tries to push the plastically deformed material back into its original volume. This “pushing” is the compressive stress that is a beneficial material property.
Variations on this method include striking the surface with particles spun off from a rotating wheel, low plasticity burnishing with a ball that is hydraulically pressed into the surface as it rolls across the part, and laser shock peening (LSP).
Cavitation peening is another method that involves shooting a high-pressure liquid jet against the target material in such a manner that cavitation bubbles collapse and shock waves pass into the material. Cavitation peening is generally performed with the liquid jet and the target material both submerged in a liquid. The shock waves generate compressive residual stresses in the target material similar to the other methods described above. However, cavitation peening has traditionally presented several shortcomings, such as limited stress depth and limited process rates, as has been known to cause damage to the surface of the peened material.
Examples of cleaning or stripping methods may include removal of scale, oxides, chrome coatings, thermal barrier coatings, or others. Examples of surface roughening applications include roughening metals or ceramics to create a desirable bonding surface geometry for coatings or bonding agents.
Low cost, easy to implement, and improved performance methods of accomplishing the above processes and objectives are needed and are provided by embodiments of the present invention.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in the referenced figures. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive.
One skilled in the art will recognize many methods, systems, and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein, which could be used in the practice of the present invention. Indeed, the present invention is in no way limited to the methods, systems, and materials described.
Methods of inducing residual compressive stresses in materials are desired in order to improve properties such as resistance to fatigue failure and stress corrosion cracking. Further, methods are needed to clean, strip coatings from, or roughen surfaces in difficult applications. High-speed methods of performing the above mentioned processes without damaging the processed target material are needed as an improvement over current methods.
The inventors have recognized that all of the aforementioned methods have various shortcomings and limitations. Some or all of these shortcomings and limitations are remedied by the embodiments of the present invention discussed below. What follows is a discussion of some of the recognized shortcomings of past peening methods.
Conventional shot peening only produces relatively shallow compressive stresses, typically less than 0.25 mm deep. It also has the considerable drawback of roughening up the surface to be peened, thereby causing a limitation to the improvement in fatigue life.
Low plasticity burnishing is limited to accessible geometry that will allow access to the rolling ball and hydraulic actuators. Ultrasonic peening, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,276,824, is faced with similar limitations.
Laser shock peening is comparatively slow and very expensive. The equipment typically costs millions of dollars per station. The materials that can be processed using this method are limited, and this method is difficult to deploy under water. It is also difficult to apply laser peening to confined spaces, such as inside of small-diameter tubes or cavities.
Cavitation peening is lower cost than laser shock peening but has traditionally been more expensive than conventional peening, due in part to long process times. The residual stresses generated using cavitation peening can be deeper than conventional peening. U.S. Pat. No. 5,778,713 describes a cavitation peening method that shoots the liquid jet directly at the target material to perform peening. However, that invention is stated to be suitable for metal materials only and the direct impingement of the liquid jet requires utilization of a fine resolution raster pattern to cover the surface with the small jet footprint, requiring a significant amount of process time. The direct impingement method can also cause surface damage by erosion caused by the high velocity liquid jet that acts upon the surface of the material, thus limiting the available developed stress intensity. This is particularly true if the process time is long enough to provide the desired stress intensity and depth.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,897,062 is another cavitation peening method that directly impinges the liquid jet on the material surface, can cause damage to the material surface, and is limited to jet pressures of 3,000 to 15,000 psi. Such low pressures result in low stress intensity and depth unless a high flow rate and long process time are provided. The high jet flow rate would require excessively heavy tooling due to the high reaction forces that would be present. This is especially prohibitive in remotely performed applications, such as nuclear reactor peening. The relatively long process time results in an overly costly method.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,345,083 describes a method of cavitation peening without aiming the high-pressure liquid jet directly at the material, but mechanical deflectors are required to reflect the jet into the material thus weakening the jet power and requiring frequent tool replacement due to tool erosion by the jet.
It is noted that methods such as burnishing, laser shock peening, or methods using lower pressure cavitation peening (which requires higher volume) can be difficult to impossible to deploy in many applications due to the tool loading or support equipment that is required.
Conventional cleaning and coating removal methods often involve the undesired use of chemicals or destructive mechanical methods. Some of the above mentioned prior processes utilize cavitation and discuss surface cleaning—however, the direct impingement of the high velocity liquid jets cause damage to the substrate material when tough coatings are to be removed due to erosion by the high velocity liquid jet. U.S. Pat. No. 5,086,974 discloses a direct impingement cavitating liquid jet method for removing paint. However, the energy level of the liquid jet must be severely restricted so that the substrate material is not damaged, and the method cannot be used for more difficult coatings such as metallic plating or ceramic coatings.
Embodiments of the present invention overcome one or more of the aforementioned limitations by providing a submerged pressurized liquid jet that does not impinge directly against the target material. This is accomplished by aiming a high-pressure liquid jet substantially tangential or parallel to the surface of the target material to be processed. This method allows the use of cavitation for peening or surface cleaning without the damaging effects of a direct impingement high-pressure liquid jet.
The nozzle 22 (or a plurality of nozzles) is mounted to a robotic manipulator 24 configured to provide relative motion between the nozzle 22 and a target material 40 (e.g., the portion thereof to be processed). The nozzle 22 and the target material 40 are submerged in a tank 44 of liquid 46. The relative motion between the nozzle 22 and the target material 40 is designed such that a high-pressure liquid jet 50 passes proximate to or in contact with a surface 42 of the target material 40 in areas that are desired to be processed. The robotic manipulator 24 may be coupled to a computer control unit 48 configured to preprogram and control the movement of the nozzle 22 in a plurality of dimensions and to control the starting and stopping of the process (e.g., by controlling the operation of the pump 12, etc.) using pre-programmed instructions. Alternatively, the target material 40 may be mounted on the robotic manipulator 24 to provide the relative motion with the nozzle 22 being stationary. A further alternative is that both the nozzle 22 and the target material 40 are mounted on separate robotic manipulators 24 to provide the relative motion. Additionally, the nozzle 22 could also be held by a person and pointed at the surface 42 of the target material 40, wherein the operator manually moves the nozzle 22 to process a desired area of the material. As an example, the robotic manipulator 24 may be a Flying Bridge available from Flow International, a PAR Vector CNC, or other suitable robotic manipulator. An additional alternative is that, if only a small area is to be processed in one operation, processing may be performed with little or no relative motion between the nozzle 22 and the target material 40.
Another example of a robotic motion device is a remotely operated vehicle. The robotic motion device can be pre-programmed or may be operated manually to create the desired relative motion between the nozzle 22 and the material 40 so that a cavitation footprint 54 (see
As shown in
Further, the non-contact jet 50 allows the use of higher pressure, higher velocity, more intense cavitation jets, without damaging the surface 42 by direct contact of the high velocity liquid jet against the material 40. Because there is little danger of damaging the material 40, embodiments of the present invention allow intense cavitation peening and result in improved residual stress results compared to direct impingement peening. A unit-less example of a stress-depth curve 45 that can be generated using the peening system 10 is shown in
When roughening surfaces, embodiments of the invention may be used to provide extremely well controlled consistent finishes for the surface 42 because the finish is created by action of cavitation only and is not influenced by liquid jet erosion. Because the liquid jet 50 does not contact the surface 42, high-energy cavitation jets can be utilized without danger of erosion caused by the jets.
Embodiments of the present invention are easily deployed because the cavitation nozzle 22 can be small, lightweight, and in some embodiments (ultra-high pressure/low flow rate embodiments), the reaction load on the manipulator 24 or processed material 40 is relatively very low. A significant benefit of the invention is that the system 10 is operative to, with a single tool, perform one or a combination of processes including cleaning material surfaces, removing coatings from materials, roughening material surfaces, and/or generating beneficial compressive residual stresses or reducing tensile residual stresses in materials.
As discussed above, some embodiments of the present invention use the high-pressure liquid jet 50 to generate cavitation that peens materials, thereby creating beneficial compressive residual stresses. The process relies on shock waves induced by cavitation bubbles collapsing on the surface 42 of the material 40 to be peened, instead of deformation of the surface. The process may be performed with the nozzle 22, liquid jet 50, and the processed material 40 submerged in the tank 44 of liquid 46 (see
As shown in
If the jet 50 is oriented off-parallel to the surface 42 of the material 40 as shown in
The nozzle 22 and jet 50 can be passed over the material 40 to cover large areas, or alternatively, can be operated momentarily at a stationary location over the material to process a limited area. In the latter case, the jet 50 can then be turned off and moved to another location and operated a multiple of times to provide the desired coverage.
This invention can be used on shapes ranging from simple flat or cylindrical materials, to complex shapes such as gears, turbines, or nuclear reactor core components.
Examples of liquids that may be used as the peening liquid 16 may include water, oil, liquid rust inhibitor, a solution of one liquid containing other liquid, or a solution of a liquid containing dissolved solids. The liquid 16 may be supplied to the nozzle 22 at pumped pressures of 15,000 to 200,000 psi, or higher. A non-limiting example nozzle 22 may have an orifice opening diameter of between approximately 0.003 inches (0.00762 cm) and 0.25 inches (0.635 cm). The cavitation jet 50 can be operated when the surrounding liquid 46 (see
The foregoing described embodiments depict different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected,” or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that, based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention and its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scope of this invention. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the invention is solely defined by the appended claims. It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.).
It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to inventions containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations).
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/531,776, filed Sep. 7, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/542,710, filed Oct. 3, 2011, both entitled “Method and Apparatus for Non-contact Surface Enhancement,” which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3688511 | Harmstrof | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3834200 | Winter | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4172974 | Stingelin et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4365493 | Feld et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4772304 | Nakae et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 5048316 | Thompson | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5086974 | Henshaw | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5117366 | Stong | May 1992 | A |
| 5305361 | Enomoto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5553106 | Enomoto et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5584016 | Varghese et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5704824 | Hashish et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5749384 | Hayashi et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5778713 | Butler | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5897062 | Enomoto et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5932120 | Mannava et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6058153 | Kurosawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6153023 | Rokutanda | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6240155 | Kurosawa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6280302 | Hashish et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6341151 | Enomoto et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345083 | Enomoto et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6358120 | Poling et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6425276 | Hirano | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6464567 | Hashish et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6502442 | Arola et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6519991 | Hirano et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6630247 | Fox et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6639962 | Enomoto | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6752686 | Hashish et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6855208 | Soyama | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6945859 | Hashish et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6981906 | Hashish et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7276824 | Statnikov et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7419418 | Alberts et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7699449 | Yoshino et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7716961 | Hatou et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720190 | Shimamura et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7789734 | Swift et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7884924 | Numata et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 20020032498 | Mattke et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020079602 | Pfeiffer | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030065424 | Erichsen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120375 | Arai et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139041 | LeClair | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208296 | Brisson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040004055 | Barros | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040237713 | Breslin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250584 | Offer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050103362 | Soyama | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20080130819 | Ortega et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090124169 | Alberts et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100242660 | Offer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110005288 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110232348 | Hatou et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2007124396 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130233040 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61531776 | Sep 2011 | US | |
| 61542710 | Oct 2011 | US |
