This invention relates generally to electronically determining the status of a telephone over a network. More specifically, the present invention provides a method and apparatus for obtaining the status of a telephone (whether on-hook or off-hook) over a network in order to maximize the probability of reaching a desired party. It also provides a method and apparatus for sending an e-mail to the desired party for storage as a voice mail message.
Literally millions of times per day, parties attempt to contact one another, only to find that the party initiating the telephone call receives a busy signal or is put into the phone mail of the receiving telephone when that telephone is off-hook. Not only is this experience frustrating for the caller, but also can result in lost business or social opportunities on the part of the receiving party who is on the line speaking with someone else. In addition, receiving busy signals and the inability to complete telephone calls results in the loss of millions of dollars in revenue both from the time expended by the caller in trying to reach the desired party, as well as lost opportunities for commerce or other social contact.
Telephone line activity monitoring has been the subject of invention in the past. A form of line activity monitoring has been proposed for the purpose of obtaining information regarding statistics of line usage. This proposed system detects the usage of the line, but does not transmit status information to others in any current fashion. For further details, refer to U.S. Pat. No. 4,559,416 to Theis et al.
Another monitoring system has been described whose purpose is to notify an operator that a telephone line is open so that a desired message can be delivered by the operator to a receiving party. This system comprises an automatic dialer that attempts to reach individuals on a repetitive basis until a connection is made. Again, status of the telephone at any given point of time is not provided. For further details, refer to U.S. Pat. No. 3,989,899 to Norwich.
An integrated calling directory has been described that utilizes a personal computer that stores information about the numbers being called. It does not address the problem associated with the called party telephone being in an off-hook condition. This condition is not reported in any fashion to the initiator of the telephone call. For further details, refer to U.S. Pat. No. 4,734,931 to Bourg et al.
A communication system has been proposed that uses a voice message system for storing and retrieving voice messages and faxed data and for converting text into voice messages. This proposed system does not deal with the issue of how to contact the party receiving the phone call but only leaves a message for that party in the event that the phone is in an off-hook condition. For further details, refer to U.S. Pat. No. 5,530,740 to Irribarren et al.
Another information processing system has been described as having a telephone and an informational processing device. This system does not address the issue of whether a called party telephone is in an on-hook or off-hook condition. For further details, refer to U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,893 to Onosaka.
A system for synchronization of mail boxes over a network has been proposed. This system is designed to ensure that information in electronic mail is complete in a series of different mailboxes. The issue of providing information to a caller regarding the status of a called party's telephone is not dealt with. For further details, refer to U.S. Pat. No. 5,647,002 to Brunson.
What is desired is a system whereby a calling party can pre-determine the status of a called party's telephone (on-hook or off-hook) so as to maximize the opportunity for completing a telephone call to the desired party.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to maximize the probability that a calling party will actually contact a called party when a telephone call is made.
It is a further objective of the present invention to provide a status of the called party's telephone (on-hook or off-hook) before the calling party makes the telephone call to the called party.
It is a further objective of the present invention to provide telephone status information over a network.
It is a further objection of the present invention to continually monitor the status of a telephone in order to provide the telephone in order to provide the telephone status information desired.
It is a further objective of the present invention to store telephone line status in a file that can be accessed by others.
It is a further objective of the present invention to constantly update the telephone line status file so that callers accessing the file can have an up-to-date record of the status of a telephone to be called.
It is a further objective of the present invention to obtain the status of a called party's telephone over cable systems connected to public switched telephone networks.
It is yet another objection to obtain the status of a called party's telephone when both the called party and the calling party are connected to cable systems.
It is a further objective of the present invention to obtain the status of a called party's telephone when the called party is connected to a cable system but the calling party is not.
It is yet another objective of the present invention to generally provide information concerning home and office equipment and functions to a file that can be accessed by networks external to the home, such as the Internet.
These and other objectives of the present invention will become apparent from a review of the general and detailed descriptions that follow. The present invention provides a method for a calling party to receive constantly updated information concerning the status of a telephone (on-hook or off-hook) to be called. For purposes of this specification this status will generally be called the “telephone status.” The present invention also provides a way for a calling party to leave e-mail and voice mail to the called party as part of the determination of telephone status.
The present invention comprises a monitoring system that can constantly poll a series of telephones, and stores information concerning the telephone status in a telephone status file. Alternatively, the system switch simply records the off-hook status of a telephone of the system and provides a notation to a file that is accessible to others. Thus, a telephone is presumed to be on-hook unless it is determined to be off-hook. That file is one that, in a preferred embodiment, can be accessed over the Internet. When a calling party desires to maximize its probability of actually being connected with a called party, the calling party accesses the telephone's status file over the Internet and receives a determination of whether the called telephone is on-hook or off-hook. When an off-hook condition is noted, the calling party will not attempt to place the telephone call. In addition, the calling party may elect to alert the called party that a call was attempted, to send an e-mail and have the e-mail delivered as a voice mail message, or to be signaled when the called party's phone is on-hook. When the telephone status is noted as on-hook, the calling party can then make the telephone call with some reasonable assurance of reaching the telephone of the called party.
This system differs from existing private branch exchanges (PBX) in that a current PBX can have a “camp on” feature that allows a use to place a phone call to a telephone on the PBX, note that the called telephone is off-hook and “camp on” to the called party's telephone line so that when an on-hook condition is noted, the PBX can automatically connect the calling party to the called party. The difficulty with such camp on systems is that they cannot be used by people outside the PBX. In addition, when using the camp on feature, the call is “camped” only after is placed. The caller still has invested both time and money in exchange for a busy signal. In contrast to existing PB camp on systems, the system and method of the present invention allows a user to be advised of the status of a telephone via network external to the location of the telephone to maximize the probability of actually making the desired connection.
An alternative embodiment of the present invention is to connect the calling party's telephone to the computer at the calling party's location. Thereafter, upon a determination by the calling party's telephone is such that a call can be made, the user's computer will then dial the user's telephone prompting the user to pick that telephone up and thereafter dial the called party's telephone thereby completing the telephone call in an automated fashion.
A further embodiment of the present invention is to use a telecommunications device (wireless or otherwise, e.g., a computer, a telephone, or a personal digital assistant) to send the called party an e-mail and then have the e-mail delivered to the called party's voice mail box. The called party retrieves the e-mail-converted-to-voice message from the voice mail box using any of a number of devices (e.g., a computer, a telephone, or a personal digital assistant).
It is also the case the telephone companies are seeking to expand their markets for both long distance and local services. This expansion has caused certain long distance to acquire cable companies in order to provide local service to customers. This cable-borne telephone is yet another way for long distance carriers to reach local users by virtue of the cable system infrastructure already in place. Where such cable infrastructure exists, it is also possible to obtain the telephone status of users telephones over the cable system.
Obtaining telephone status over the cable network occurs in a similar fashion to that already noted above. In a first embodiment, a called party's telephone is either plugged into a set-top box or other interface through which telephone services are offered. Alternatively, the called party's telephone is connected to a computer system which is in turn connected to a set-top box ore other telephone and/or data interface for those cable operations that offer Internet-over-cable service. The off-hook status of the telephone at the called party's location is determined via a switch at the telephone company (telco). That off-hook status is provided to a file that is accessible over the Internet.
Thus, a calling party, desiring to obtain the status of the telephone at a location having cable service would again access the Internet and obtain information from the telephone status file which is constantly updated by the telco switch. Conversely, information concerning telephone status file over the cable network. In this manner, any user can obtain the telephone status via a computer system linked to the Internet via a cable operator. In addition, telephone status can be provided to a telephone status file over the Internet for those telephones that can use local cable operator infrastructure to connect to the public switched telephone network.
As noted above, a calling party at the cable location can also obtain the telephone status of the called party telephone by simply using the computer that is plugged into the set-top box or other telephony/data interface provided to go over the Internet to the telephone status file. This additional cable network thereby allows updating of the telephone status file and allows telephone status to be obtained in yet another fashion.
Additional objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent in the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures.
The present invention is a system and method for obtaining the telephone status (on-hook/off-hook) of a called party's telephone over a network external to the location of the called party's telephone, such as the Internet.
Referring to
The status file 8 is continually updated by monitor 6 with the on-hook or off-hook status of telephones that are monitored. Thus, the calling party communicating with a PC 12 can receive “real time” status (as determined by the sampling rate of the monitor) of a telephone being called by simply monitoring the telephone status file that is accessible over the Internet.
Since the status file is anticipated to contain many thousands of numbers it is anticipated as past of the present invention that when a calling party using its PC 12 requests the status of a particular telephone that only the status of that telephone will subsequently be displayed on the user PC. Alternatively, the user PC 12 may create a list of numbers to monitor and have the data “pushed” over the Internet 10 to the calling party's PC 12.
Referring to
Although the invention may be embodied so as to monitor status any type of telephone, it has particular value for monitoring the status of ordinary telephones on the plain old telephone system (i.e., POTS telephones). That is because the POTS does not have the sort of telephone status monitoring features that may be included in newer generations of telephone networks.
Referring again to
Referring to
Upon receipt of the called party's status, that information is displayed for the calling party 111 and thereafter, if the called party's telephone line status is in an on-hook condition, the user can then dial the called party 113.
Referring to
Referring to
This knowledge of the status of telephones in a wireless system is particularly important, since certain trends exist to charge only the caller for calls that are to be made to or from a wireless network. This is consistent with the current method of charging for telephone calls over a public switch telephone network. Thus, in a situation where a caller is charged for all telephone calls made, it will be particularly important to the caller that it not get charged for leaving a message over a wireless network which tends to be particularly expensive.
The expense in dealing with a wireless network is all the more apparent when one considers that a telephone may be in a “roaming” mode where the telephone is in a network which is not the home network for the wireless telephone. Thus, in the case where wireless telephone 118 is roaming in a second wireless network 116, a telephone call that is not completed or wherein a message is simply left, becomes all the more expensive since roaming charges will be charged to the caller as well.
It is also important to note that an entire generation of video phones 100 are becoming available. The video phone in certain instances will take the place of personal computer 20 for interacting with the Internet and making telephone calls. Such a telephone is the I Phone® model 2050, for example, whose functionality, technical aspects, and capabilities are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Such a video phone 100 can also interact with Internet 102 through WAP interface 106 to ascertain the status of wireless telephones 112, 114 over wireless network 108. When information is subsequently displayed on video phone 100 regarding the availability of wireless telephones 112, 114, a call can be placed either over the Internet 102 or over public switch telephone network 104 through the wireless network to the wireless telephones desired.
Referring to
Alternatively, where Internet telephone service is available and the calling party, via the computer 56 determines that a remote telephone is available, a calling party places a telephone call over the Internet via the calling party's telephone 58 through the calling party's computer 56 through the set-top box (or other interface) 52 to cable network operations center 50 through the Internet 10 via a computer at the called party's location to the called party's telephone 2, 3, or 4.
Referring to
When, for example, telephone 60 is making a call over cable infrastructure 64, the telephone call ultimately goes through some form of switch 68, and then to the public switched telephone network 72 for routing to its ultimate destination by known networks and means. Switch 68, having knowledge of the off hook status of telephone 60, provides that status to telephone status file 70 which is accessible over the Internet 66. A calling party having a computer 74 can then access the Internet 66 to gain access to the telephone status file 70 thereby determining if user 60 is on the line or not. Once the calling party determines that the called party telephone 60 is not off hook, a call can be made from the calling party telephone 76 over PSTN 72 to the called party 60. Alternatively, the calling party can place an Internet telephone call to the third party if the called party has this capability. Thus it can be seen that the telephone status file can be accessed over those cable systems that are linked to the normal telephone company long distance operations.
A telephone line status monitoring system and method has been described herein. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that minor modifications to the present invention could be made without departing from the scope of the invention as disclosed. For example, it is also possible with the system of the present invention to monitor temperature of the home. In this instance, the system has a thermostat in place of the telephone system. The thermostat places its readings into a file over the Internet which can be read by a user when the user is at a remote location. In this manner the user can monitor home temperature during absences.
Monitoring of temperature is also useful for refrigerators, freezers, and commercial HVAC systems. The present invention allows for problems in such thermal systems to be monitored remotely, spotted early, and corrected before any serious economic consequences occur.
Similarly, just as messages can be transmitted to the user of the telephone, so can instructions to raise or lower temperature in the home be transmitted to the thermostat over the Internet.
Alarm monitoring can also be accomplished using the system and method of the present invention. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, alarm monitoring comprises monitoring the status of sensors placed in a dwelling or other structure. Sensors may detect motion, glass breakage, opening and closing of windows and doors, heat, water, and environmental conditions. Monitoring may also comprise video imaging of a structure and the space defined by the structure. In this instance, when an alarm goes off, the alarm company can be notified. However, the alarm could also be noted in a file to be reviewed by a user when the user is away from the premises. In this case the user will know an alarm has gone off and can contact the alarm company to ascertain the meaning of the alarm.
An additional embodiment of the alarm concept of the present invention is for a formatted email to be sent to the owner of the premises so that the owner can have more specific notification of the meaning of any alarm that goes off.
A telephone status monitoring system and method has now been shown. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other equipment in the home of office may be monitored as well using the system of the present invention without departing from the scope of the invention as disclosed.
The present invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, however, it will be appreciated that various modifications and improvements may be made to the described embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. The present invention is limited only by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/182,674, filed Jul. 15, 2005, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/759,107 filed Jan. 12, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,088,802, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/963,373, filed Oct. 20, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,175,616 and a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 09/265,656, filed Mar. 2, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,483,900. The 11/182,674, 09/759,107, 09/265,656, and 08/963,373 applications are incorporated herein by reference, in the entirety, for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3989899 | Norwich | Nov 1976 | A |
4166929 | Sheinbein | Sep 1979 | A |
4335682 | Gonda et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4559416 | Theis et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4675656 | Narcisse | Jun 1987 | A |
4734931 | Bourg et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4759055 | Okumura et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4792796 | Bradshaw | Dec 1988 | A |
4918425 | Greenberg et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4969182 | Ohtsubo et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5023868 | Davidson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5054428 | Farkus | Oct 1991 | A |
5062147 | Pickett et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5223815 | Rosenthal et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5353744 | Custer | Oct 1994 | A |
5381129 | Boardman | Jan 1995 | A |
5418835 | Frohman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425091 | Josephs | Jun 1995 | A |
5425330 | Touchton et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5446553 | Grube | Aug 1995 | A |
5461365 | Schlager et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461372 | Busak et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465687 | Custer | Nov 1995 | A |
5477210 | Belcher | Dec 1995 | A |
5500893 | Onosaka | Mar 1996 | A |
5530740 | Irribarren et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5553469 | Seidel | Sep 1996 | A |
5605116 | Kim et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608786 | Gordon | Mar 1997 | A |
5642690 | Calabrese et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646593 | Hughes et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647002 | Brunson | Jul 1997 | A |
5689235 | Sugimoto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5742668 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5781102 | Huang | Jul 1998 | A |
5794143 | McCarthy et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796394 | Wicks et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5857433 | Files | Jan 1999 | A |
5868100 | Marsch | Feb 1999 | A |
5923731 | McClure | Jul 1999 | A |
5928325 | Shaughnessy et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5939988 | Neyhart | Aug 1999 | A |
5943399 | Bannister et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5977913 | Christ | Nov 1999 | A |
6011471 | Huang | Jan 2000 | A |
6029047 | Ishida et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038666 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6075443 | Schepps et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078649 | Small et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081546 | Williamson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6125176 | Foladare et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130933 | Miloslavsky | Oct 2000 | A |
6154525 | Formosa | Nov 2000 | A |
6157943 | Meyer | Dec 2000 | A |
6166635 | Huang | Dec 2000 | A |
6169484 | Schuchman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169734 | Wilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175616 | Light et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189105 | Lopes | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208725 | Davies | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6298120 | Civanlar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6366575 | Barkan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385510 | Hoog et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404764 | Jones et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405132 | Breed et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412813 | Breed et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438217 | Huna | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6490680 | Scheidt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529131 | Wentworth | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545589 | Fuller | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577238 | Whitesmith | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600422 | Barry et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6614884 | Jang | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6671355 | Spielman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6686881 | Lu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687609 | Hsiao et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6720920 | Breed et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6807423 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6820897 | Breed et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825762 | Giacopelli et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837427 | Overhultz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6861944 | Hoepelman | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6917291 | Allen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6989745 | Milinusic et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7006833 | Contractor | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7031695 | Aono et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034663 | Mansfield et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053765 | Clark | May 2006 | B1 |
7061376 | Wang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092794 | Hill et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7120238 | Bednarz et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7301451 | Hastings | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312759 | Kinney et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322043 | Letsinger | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7356137 | Burg et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7441108 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7502615 | Wilhoite et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7516325 | Willey | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7894825 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020198632 | Breed et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030035514 | Jang | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030074575 | Hoberock et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110371 | Yang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142794 | Giacopelli et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030233189 | Hsiao et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236991 | Letsinger | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040180646 | Donley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204215 | Meehan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040257219 | Spiess et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050125102 | Nichols et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128057 | Mansfield et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151640 | Hastings | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198063 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231375 | Kingston et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240918 | Shlomai | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060023848 | Mohler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034255 | Benning et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064603 | Relan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068752 | Lin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060093118 | Agrawal et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103520 | Clark | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116127 | Wilhoite et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144929 | McGee | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060220830 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239250 | Elliot et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240771 | Graves et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070206729 | Baum et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070240155 | Shlomai | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1536306 | Jun 2005 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080137822 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11182674 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 12031989 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09759107 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 11182674 | US | |
Parent | 09265656 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 09759107 | US | |
Parent | 08963373 | Oct 1997 | US |
Child | 09265656 | US |