The field of this invention is expansion of tubulars and screens downhole in a single trip into the wellbore.
The field of expansion of tubulars has gained in popularity. In early attempts, a tubular segment was collapsed to get it into a piece of casing and then, when in position; the tubular was expanded to its original dimension. This technique was used for casing patches where the tubular to be expanded was of a fairly short length. One example of this technique is U.S. Pat. No. 5,785,120. Other techniques involved hydraulic pressure applied to a swage to force it through a tubular for expansion. One example of this technique is U.S. Pat. No. 6,029,748. A shortcoming of pressure techniques are that they depend on a solid tubular to avoid losing the driving pressure. For this reason, pressure techniques are not suited for slotted liner or screen expansions. Another pressure technique is illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,148; 5,348,095 and 6,070,671.
Various expandable well screen products have been developed as illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,263,966; 5,901,789 and 6,315,040. Bottom up expansion of a slotted liner using a conical swage is illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,667,011 and 5,366,012. Roller devices have been used to provide thrust to a swage as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,895. Weatherford has advertised roller devices for expansion of tubulars to conform to the shape of the borehole. A problem with such a device, particularly when expanding screen is that some portions of the screen get expanded more than others with structural failures being the result.
What is needed and yet not made available by the prior devices or techniques is a way to expand solid tubing, slotted tubing or screen in a single trip while at the same time taking into consideration the need to not overstress the expanded tubular or screen. Equipment that allows the assembly to be run in the hole together and then selectively allows disengagement after support is established downhole, is also a feature of the present invention. An anchor that can be set and released repeatedly and fit into the expanded tubular or screen is also another aspect of the present invention. Yet another aspect is an anchor that is configured to obtain a sufficient grip for driving the swage but is otherwise limited in its axial travel so as to avoid needless stressing of the tubular of screen after it has already been expanded by about 25% or more. These and other features of the invention will be more readily apparent to a person skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment, which appears below.
A one trip system for expanding a tubular that is solid or perforated or a screen is disclosed. The downhole assembly features a hydraulic anchor that can be set, released and repositioned to repeat the process, is used. The anchor is small enough to go through the tubular or screen after initial expansion. The anchor's maximum extension is designed to avoid overstressing the already expanded tubular or screen. An expansion tool is hydraulically driven with the initial portion of the stroke delivering an enhanced force. The expansion tool initially supports the tubular or liner but subsequently releases during the first stroke, after the tubular or screen is fully supported.
a–1c are a sectional elevation of the assembly showing the anchor, the expansion tool, and the running tool in the run in position;
a–6b are a section view of a portion of the running tool in the run in position;
a–7b show the same portion of the running tool after the beginning of the stroke;
a–8b show the position of the running tool after release from the tubular or screen;
a–9b show the running tool fully stroked.
Referring to
Located below the slips 40 is closure piston 56 (see
Referring now to
Running tool 134 has a body 136 (see Figs 1c and 6–9) having a lower end 138 and adjacent openings 140 through which extend dogs 142, each of which have an exterior thread pattern 144 to mate with thread pattern 146 of the tubular, solid or slotted or a screen, all collectively referred to and defined for the purposes of this application as “tubular” 176. A plurality of leaf springs 148 bias all the dogs radially inwardly when support for the dogs 142 is removed, as shown in
The operation of the tool in the performance of the service will now be explained. The assembly of the anchor 10, the force magnifying tool 66, the running tool 134, which supports the tubular 176 at teeth 144, and the swage 180 are placed in position in the casing 179. Pressure applied to passage 32 reaches piston 38, pushing it and slips 40 down with respect to body 16. Ramps 48 ride down ramps 50 pushing the slips 40 outwardly against the return force of band springs 44. Inserts 42 bite into the casing or tubing and eventually slips 40 hit their travel stop 52. Piston 56 is moved down against the bias of spring 62. The pressure continues to build up after the slips 40 are set, as shown in
With the pressure removed from the surface, spring 62 returns the slips 40 to their original position by pushing up piston 56. If it fails to do that, a ball (not shown) is dropped on seat 26 and pressure to a high level is applied to rupture the rupture disc 20 so that piston 56 can be forced up with pressure. When piston 56 is forced up so is piston 59 due to the difference in surface areas between surfaces 75 and 77. Ratchet plug 61 is pushed up against spring 63 as fluid is displaced outwardly through passage 65. Ratchet teeth 79 and 81 lock to prevent downward movement of piston 56.
If more tubular 176 needs to be expanded, weight is set down to return the force-magnifying tool 66 to the run in position shown in
The initial stroke of the force-magnifying tool 66 features a release of the tubular 176 by the running tool 134, as illustrated in
It should be noted that there is a taper 186 on the tubular 176 just below the surface treatment 177. Taper 186 makes it easier to advance the tubular 176 into position where the surface treatment 177, which is on a larger diameter, will be in position to engage the casing 179 for support of tubular 176.
It should again be emphasized that “tubular” as used herein incorporates solid tubes, perforated or slotted tubes, and screens of any construction. The equipment and method described above allow expansion of any desired length even in deviated wellbores where string manipulation is not practical. The anchor 10 and the force-magnifying tool 66 are built to have an outside diameter that will allow them to easily pass into the expanded tubular 176. This eliminates the need for long lengths of tubing to connect a swage 180 to the force-magnifying tool 66, as would be necessary if the anchor 10 and the force-magnifying tool 66 could not pass into the expanded tubular 176. While the use of a fixed diameter swage 180 is described, a swage that can be positioned between or among several dimensions can also be used. The uniformity of expansion obtained by using a swage at a predetermined diameter avoids the potential failure problem due to uneven expansions that can occur using hydraulically actuated rollers that move responsively to the borehole shape. Swages that fix the expansion and insure that the expansion force is uniformly applied are contemplated even if such swages include rollers that are fixed. Yet another beneficial feature is the anchor 10 design. It has limited radial travel so that when energized in already expanded tubular 176 it will not further stress it to failure in trying to get an anchoring grip. The limited outward movement of the slips 40 provides this protection. To compensate for the limited radial movement when the anchor is still in the casing 179, the tubular 176 is run up to past the slips 40 on the anchor 10 so that the limited travel of the slips 40 will be sufficient to get a grip on the casing 179 due to the presence of a portion of the tubular 176 around the slips for at least the initial actuation of the anchor 10 and the stroking of swage 180 for transfer of support of the tubular 176 from the running tool 134 to the casing 179.
The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and explanatory thereof, and various changes in the size, shape and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrated construction, may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/362,306 on Mar. 7, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
556718 | Semmer | Mar 1896 | A |
2877822 | Buck | Mar 1959 | A |
3354969 | Ebeling | Nov 1967 | A |
RE28449 | Edmond | Jun 1975 | E |
4095655 | Still | Jun 1978 | A |
5101897 | Leismer et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5348095 | Worrall et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5366012 | Lohbeck | Nov 1994 | A |
5667011 | Gill et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5785120 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794703 | Newman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5901789 | Donnelly et al. | May 1999 | A |
5944102 | Kilgore et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960895 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012523 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021850 | Wood et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029748 | Forsyth et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6070671 | Cumming et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6241017 | Doane et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263966 | Haut et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6315040 | Donnelly | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325148 | Trahan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6668930 | Hoffman | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6732806 | Mauldin et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6799637 | Schetky et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20030141074 | Freeman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030168222 | Maguire et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188874 | Gabrysch et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040216891 | Maguire | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040216893 | Hirth | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040216894 | Maguire | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2370301 | Jun 2002 | GB |
WO 0037771 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0118354 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0160545 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 02090713 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030196818 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60362306 | Mar 2002 | US |