METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT USING OBJECTIVE PAIN MEASURE

Abstract
An example of a system for managing pain may include a pain monitoring circuit, a pain relief device, and a control circuit. The pain monitoring circuit may include a parameter analyzer and a pain score generator. The parameter analyzer may be configured to receive and analyze at least two parameters selected from a physiological parameter indicative of a physiological function or state of a patient, a functional parameter indicative of a physical activity or state of the patient, or a patient parameter including subjective information provided by the patient. The pain score generator may be configured to compute a composite pain score using an outcome of the analysis. The composite pain score may indicate a degree of the pain. The pain relief device may be configured to deliver a pain-relief therapy. The control circuit may be configured to control the delivery of the pain-relief therapy using the composite pain score.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This document relates generally to medical devices and more particularly to a pain management system that uses sensed physiological and/or functional parameters to produce an objective measure for pain.


BACKGROUND

Pain may result from an injury, a disease (e.g., arthritis, fibromyalgia), or even a medical treatment (e.g., certain cancer treatment). Various treatments are applied for pain management, such as medication, psychotherapy, electrical stimulation, thermal therapy, and their various combinations. Examples of electrical stimulation for pain management include Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) delivered by a TENS unit and Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) that may be delivered by an implantable neuromodulation systems. Pain treatment may be prescribed based on an assessment of a patient's symptoms and underlying conditioning and titrated based on the patient's response to the treatment. As pain is not directly measurable by a machine, the assessment of the condition and the titration of the therapy may depend on questioning the patient.


SUMMARY

An example (e.g., “Example 1”) of a system for managing pain of a patient may include a pain monitoring circuit, a pain relief device, and a control circuit. The pain monitoring circuit may include a parameter analyzer and a pain score generator. The parameter analyzer may be configured to receive and analyze at least two parameters selected from a physiological parameter indicative of a physiological function or state of the patient, a functional parameter indicative of a physical activity or state of the patient, or a patient parameter including subjective information provided by the patient. The pain score generator may be configured to compute a composite pain score using an outcome of the analysis. The composite pain score may indicate a degree of the pain. The pain relief device may be configured to deliver one or more pain-relief therapies. The control circuit may be configured to control the delivery of the one or more pain-relief therapies using the composite pain score and therapy parameters.


In Example 2, the subject matter of Example 1 may optionally be configured such that the parameter analyzer is configured to produce a signal metric using the at least two parameters, and the pain score generator is configured to compute the composite pain score using the signal metric.


In Example 3, the subject matter of Example 2 may optionally be configured such that the parameter analyzer is configured to generate one or more weighting factors and is configured to produce the signal metric using the at least two parameters with the one or more weighting factors each applied to a parameter of the at least two parameters.


In Example 4, the subject matter of Example 3 may optionally be configured such that the parameter analyzer is configured to adjust the one or more weighting factors by automatic adaptation to the patient over time.


In Example 5, the subject matter of any one or any combination of Examples 1 to 4 may optionally be configured such that the pain monitoring circuit further include: one or more physiological signal sensors configured to sense one or more physiological signals from the patient, a physiological signal sensing circuit configured to process the one or more physiological signals, a physiological parameter generator configured to generate the physiological parameter using the processed one or more physiological signals, one or more functional signal sensors to sense one or more functional signals from the patient, a functional signal sensing circuit configured to process the one or more functional signals, and a functional parameter generator configured to generate the functional parameter using the processed one or more functional signals.


In Example 6, the subject matter of Example 5 may optionally be configured such that the one or more physiological signal sensors include a sensor configured to sense a physiological signal indicative of change in sympathetic activity, and the physiological parameter generator is configured to generate a physiological parameter being a measure of the change in sympathetic activity.


In Example 7, the subject matter of Example 5 may optionally be configured such that the one or more physiological signal sensors include a sensor configured to sense a physiological signal indicative of a neural activity, and the physiological parameter generator is configured to generate a physiological parameter being a measure of the neural activity.


In Example 8, the subject matter of Example 5 may optionally be configured such that the one or more functional signal sensors include a sensor configured to sense a function signal indicative of a measure of movement or posture, and the functional parameter generator is configured to generate a functional parameter quantitatively indicative the measure of movement or posture.


In Example 9, the subject matter of any one or any combination of Examples 1 to 8 may optionally be configured to include a patient information input device configured to receive patient information related to pain, a patient information processing circuit configured to process the patient information, and a patient parameter generator configured to generate the patient parameter using the processed patient information.


In Example 10, the subject matter of any one or any combination of Examples 1 to 9 may optionally be configured such that the pain relief device includes a neuromodulator to deliver a neuromodulation therapy including electrical stimulation.


In Example 11, the subject matter of any one or any combination of Examples 1 to 10 may optionally be configured such that the pain relief device includes a drug pump.


In Example 12, the subject matter of any one or any combination of Examples 1 to 11 may optionally be configured to include an implantable medical device including the pain monitoring circuit, the pain relief device, and the control circuit, and the control circuit includes an implant control circuit.


In Example 13, the subject matter of Example 12 may optionally be configured to include an external device configured to be communicatively coupled to the implantable medical device. The external device includes the patient information input device including a patent input device configured to receive a parameter representative of intensity of the pain specified by the patient.


In Example 14, the subject matter of Example 13 may optionally be configured such that the external device is configured to receive the composite pain score, to produce a notification using the composite pain score, to determine one or more recipients of the notification using the composite pain score, and to control delivery of the notification to each of the one or more recipients.


In Example 15, the subject matter of Example 14 may optionally be configured such that the external device is configured to produce external commands for adjusting the therapy parameters using the composite pain score and the patient information and transmit the external commands to the implantable medical device, and the implant control circuit is configured to adjust the therapy parameters using the external commands.


An example (e.g., “Example 16”) of a method for managing pain of a patient is also provided. The method may include receiving and analyzing at least two parameter selected from a physiological parameter indicative of a physiological function or state of the patient, a functional parameter indicative of a physical activity or state of the patient, and a patient parameter related to the pain automatically using a processor, the patient parameter including subjective information provided by the patient, computing a composite pain score using the processor based on an outcome of the analysis, the composite pain score indicating of a degree of the pain, delivering one or more pain-relief therapies using a pain relief therapy device, and controlling the delivery of the one or more pain-relief therapies from the pain relief therapy device automatically using the processor based on the composite pain score and therapy parameters.


In Example 17, the subject matter of Example 16 may optionally further include generating one or more weighting factors, and the subject matter of analyzing the at least two parameters as found in Example 16 may optionally include generating a signal metric using the at least two parameters with the one or more weighting factors each applied to a parameter of the at least two parameters, and the subject matter of computing the composite pain score as found in Example 16 may optionally include computing the composite pain score using the signal metric.


In Example 18, the subject matter of Example 17 may optionally further include adjusting the one or more weighting factors by automatic adaptation to the patient over time.


In Example 19, the subject matter of any one or any combination of Example 16 may optionally further include sensing one or more physiological signals from the patient using one or more physiological signal sensors, generating the physiological parameter based the one or more physiological signals using the processor, sensing one or more functional signals from the patient using one or more functional signal sensors, generating the functional parameter based the one or more functional signals using the processor, and receiving a parameter representative of intensity of the pain from the patient.


In Example 20, the subject matter of generating the physiological parameter as found in Example 19 may optionally include generating a measure of the change in sympathetic activity.


In Example 21, the subject matter of generating the physiological parameter as found in any one or any combination of Examples 19 and 20 may optionally include generating a measure of the neural activity.


In Example 22, the subject matter of generating the functional parameter as found in any one or any combination of Examples 19 to 21 may optionally include generating a functional parameter quantitatively indicative of a measure of movement or posture.


In Example 23, the subject matter of any one or any combination of Examples 16 to 22 may optionally include producing a notification using the composite pain score, determining one or more recipients of the notification using the composite pain score and one or more specified thresholds, and delivering the notification to each of the one or more recipients.


In Example 24, the subject matter of delivering the one or more pain-relief therapies using the pain relief therapy device as found in any one or any combination of Examples 16 to 23 may optionally include delivering one or more of a neuromodulation therapy including electrical stimulation or a drug therapy from an implantable medical device.


In Example 25, the subject matter of Example 24 may optionally further include adjusting the therapy parameters using the composite pain score and a patient command entered by the patient using an external device communicatively coupled to the implantable medical device.


This Summary is an overview of some of the teachings of the present application and not intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive treatment of the present subject matter. Further details about the present subject matter are found in the detailed description and appended claims. Other aspects of the disclosure will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description and viewing the drawings that form a part thereof, each of which are not to be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, various embodiments discussed in the present document. The drawings are for illustrative purposes only and may not be to scale.



FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a pain analyzer.



FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of a pain monitoring circuit including a pain analyzer such as the pain analyzer of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a pain management system and portions of an environment in which the system operates.



FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of a method for pain management such as may be performed by the pain management system of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a pain management system and portions of an environment in which the system operates.



FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a method for pain management such as may be performed by the pain management system of FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of an implantable medical device of a pain management system such as the pain management system of FIG. 5.



FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of an external device of a pain management system such as the pain management system of FIG. 5.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a remote device of a pain management system such as the pain management system of FIG. 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that the embodiments may be combined, or that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. References to “an”, “one”, or “various” embodiments in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references contemplate more than one embodiment. The following detailed description provides examples, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.


This document discusses a pain management system that provides a quantitative measure of a patient's pain (or pain-related condition or symptom) for diagnostic, monitoring, and/or therapeutic purposes. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.) defines pain as an “unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that is associated with the actual or potential tissue damage or described in such terms.” While also experienced by healthy people, elevated levels of pain are experienced by many patients suffering from various types of injuries and diseases. Managing pain is a top priority of physicians and nurses. In a clinic, pain is often quantified by questioning the patient using the visual analog scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale (NRS). VAS allows the patient to indicate a point representing the perceived pain level in a continuum from no pain to the worst imaginable pain. NRS allows to patient to select a number between 0 and 10 representing the perceived pain level from no pain (“0”) to the worst imaginable pain (“10”). However, the pain value as indicated by the patient is a subjective measure. One patient's “10” could be another patient's “1”. In addition, monitoring and quantifying chronic pain presents additional challenges as the patient's perception of pain can change over time. Furthermore, some patients such as infants and disabled may have a challenge communicating their perception of pain. A lack of an objective measure of pain results in many challenges in healthcare besides such examples.


The subjective pain value can lead to challenges such as over and under dosing of analgesics (especially opioids), misdiagnosis, suboptimal therapy, extended hospital stay, and increased healthcare cost. Patients and their care providers can both benefit from a more objective measure of pain. Many measurable parameters are known to relate to pain (see Table 1). Such parameters, individually or in combination, may be measured in the present pain management system discussed in this document. In various embodiments, one or more of such parameters can be acquired to produce a pain score being a quantitative measure of pain. In various embodiments, this pain score can be used to adjust or optimize a pain relief therapy in a closed-loop pain management system. For example, a pain monitoring system producing such a pain score can be integrated into a closed-loop pain management system to titrate a pain control therapy. Examples of such pain control therapy can include any one or any combination of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglia (DRG) stimulation, deep brain stimulation (DBS), motor cortex stimulation (MCS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), trigeminal nerve stimulation, occipital nerve stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), sacral nerve stimulation, pudendal nerve stimulation, sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation, sympathetic nerve modulation, multifidus muscle stimulation, adrenal gland modulation, carotid baroreceptor stimulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), tibial nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), pulsed radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound therapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), optical stimulation, optogenetic therapy, magnetic stimulation, other peripheral tissue stimulation therapies, other peripheral tissue denervation therapies, drug therapy (such as delivered from a drug pump), and nerve blocks or injections (such as pharmaceuticals or biologics).


Pain alters various physiological and functional signals that can be sensed from the patient invasively or non-invasively. Such signals can be used to quantify the patient's pain levels. Physiological signals such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, and skin conductance, as well as signals derived from these such as heart rate variability, may show abnormal patterns when the patient experiences pain, due to the patient's sympathetic activity elevated by pain. The physiological signals indicative of level of sympathetic activity can therefore be collected via invasive and/or non-invasive means for analysis of the patient pain state. Pain is felt by the patient through transmission of neural signals in the patient's nervous system. Thus, pain can be measured more directly by sensing the patient's neural activities. Pain alters neuronal connection, resulting in predictable changes in electrical activity in the nervous system that can be captured by, for example, electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG), which can be analyzed to assess the patient's pain by evaluating neural function. Functional signals such as those indicative of a measure of movement (e.g., activity level, gait pattern, range of motion, or sleep) or posture can also indicate the patient's pain state, because pain can impact various functional aspects of the patient's daily activities when the patient has to compensate for discomfort during the activities. For example, the patient may try to reduce pain with irregular gait patterns and/or lower activity levels. Such functional signals can also be monitored for analyzing the patient pain state. In various embodiments, such physiological and functional parameters when used individually or in various combinations can provide for an objective and quantitative measure of the patient's pain.


In addition to the physiological and/or functional parameters, the analysis of pain can also include subjective input from the patient. For example, the patient's mood and mental state such as stress level and sleep quality can impact the patient's perception of pain. Furthermore, the analysis of pain can also include environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, and/or air pressure, which may influence discernment of pain. Time of day, which may capture circadian influence on pain, can also be included in the analysis of pain.


In various embodiments, the present pain management system can sense pain-indicating physiological and functional signals and analyze the signals using an objective method to produce a quantitative measure representative of the pain state of the patient, to control therapy delivery, and to evaluate efficacy of therapeutic intervention for pain. In various embodiments, outcomes of the analysis can include an objective pain measure based on one or more physiological parameters and one or more function parameter. In various embodiments, the objective pain measure is further combined with relevant medical history of the patient and/or input received from the patient or their caregivers to produce a composite pain score. This pain score represents the patient's pain intensity and can be reported to the patient and/or a care provider, and can be used to start, stop, and adjust pain management therapies.


While various physiological or functional parameters have been studied for indicating or measuring pain, the present pain management system combines both physiological and functional parameters to better capture the patient's pain experience and quantify the pain experience into an objective pain value (e.g., the composite pain score). For example, the system can include sensors for sensing the physiological and functional signals, a patient information input to receive patient information such as subjective pain level perceived by the patient and/or pain-related information in the patient's medical history, a processing circuit to produce the physiological and functional parameters by extracting relevant information from the sensed signals and computing the composite pain score based on the physiological and functional parameters and the patient information. The composite pain score as well as the algorithm for its computation can be updated continuously, periodically, according to other schedules, or as needed to reflect the changes in the physiological and functional parameters and the patient information. The composite pain score can be used for monitoring the patient's pain state and/or titrating one or more pain relief therapies the patient receives.



FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a pain analyzer 100 that can include a parameter analyzer 102 and a pain score generator 104. In the illustrated embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 receives and analyzes one or more physiological parameters each indicative of a physiological function or state of a patient, one or more functional parameters each indicative of a physical activity or state of the patient, and one or more patient parameters related to the pain, such as a parameter representative of intensity of the pain specified by the patient. Pain score generator 104 computes a composite pain score using an outcome of the analysis. The composite pain score indicates a degree of the pain. In various embodiments, parameter analyzer 102 can receive and analyze at least one physiological parameter and one functional parameter. Pain score generator 104 can compute a composite pain score using an outcome of the analysis.


In various embodiments, parameter analyzer 102 can produce a signal metric using one or more physiological parameters, one or more functional parameters, and/or the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using at least one parameter selected from the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, or the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using at least two parameters selected from the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, or the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using at least one physiological parameter and one functional parameter. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using at least two parameters selected from a physiological parameter, a functional parameter, and a patient parameter. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using the one or more physiological parameters and the one or more functional parameters. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using the one or more physiological parameters and the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using the one or more functional parameters and the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, parameter analyzer 102 produces the signal metric using the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, and the one or more patient parameters.


The signal metric can be a linear or nonlinear combination of the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, and/or the one or more patient parameters. In various embodiments, parameter analyzer 102 can produce the signal metric using the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, and/or the one or more patient parameters with the weighting factors each applied to one of these parameters. In various embodiments, parameter analyzer 102 can adjust the weighting factors through automatic learning and adaptation to the patient over time (e.g., based on stored parameters and/or outcomes of analysis, such as features extracted from the parameters). In various other embodiments, parameter analyzer 102 can allow the weighting factors to be adjusted manually. In various other embodiments, the weighting factors can be adjusted according to a calibration schedule or as needed, and the adjustment can be performed by a user such as a physician or other authorized care provider in a clinic, or initiated by the patient and performed by parameter analyzer 102 automatically at home. In various embodiments, the weighting factors can be patient-specific and dynamically changed based on the patient's conditions and/or activities, such as source of pain, type of pain, related pathological condition, physical condition (e.g., bed-ridden), time of day, and/or physical activity (e.g., patient being sleeping or walking).


In various embodiments, pain score generator 104 can compute the composite pain score using the signal metric. In one embodiment, pain score generator 104 trends the signal metric and computes the composite pain score based on the resulting trending of the signal metric.



FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of a pain monitoring circuit 210. In the illustrated embodiment, pain monitoring circuit 210 includes one or more physiological signal sensors 212, a physiological signal sensing circuit 214, a physiological parameter generator 216, one or more functional signal sensors 218, a functional signal sensing circuit 220, a functional parameter generator 222, a patient information input device 224, a patient information processing circuit 226, a patient parameter generator 228, and pain analyzer 100. In various embodiments, pain monitoring circuit 210 can include at least one or more physiological signal sensors 212, physiological signal sensing circuit 214, physiological parameter generator 216, one or more functional signal sensors 218, functional signal sensing circuit 220, functional parameter generator 222, and pain analyzer 100.


In various embodiments, one or more physiological signal sensors 212 can each sense one or more physiological signals, and can each be a non-invasive, percutaneous, or implantable sensor. Physiological signal sensing circuit 214 can process the one or more physiological signals. Physiological parameter generator 216 can generate the one or more physiological parameters using the processed one or more physiological signals. Examples of the one or more physiological parameters can include one or more measures of physiologic manifestations of change in the patient's sympathetic activity (referred to as “autonomic measures”), one or more direct measures of neuronal activity (referred to as “neuron/brain measures”), and/or one or more chemical or analyte parameters derived from body tissue, fluid, and/or excretion collected from the patient.


Examples of the one or more autonomic measures can include (1) heart rate and heart rate variability, including time and frequency domain measures, statistic metrics in the time domain including standard deviation of the baseline normal R-R intervals to assess changes from baseline, the square root of mean squared differences of successive R-R intervals over different time windows, q-factors for spectral peaks at very low frequency (VLF), low frequency (LF), and high frequencies (HF), ratio of power in the different frequency bands (LF/HF), changes in frequency of maximum peaks over time, and complexity metrics derived from these signals; (2) blood pressure measures including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse transit time, wave amplitude, and volume (the blood pressure measures can be obtained using heart sounds such as by leveraging the second heart sound (S2) as a strong surrogate for pressure readings through either invasive or noninvasive means, or can also be acquired using blood pressure cuffs or photoplethysmograms (PPGs)); and (3) galvanic skin response, including time and frequency domain measures. Additional examples of the one or more autonomic measures can be found in Table 1 (e.g., under “Autonomic Measures”). Examples of the neuron/brain measures can include (1) electroencephalogram (EEG) based pattern analysis and frequency domain measures; (2) electromyogram (EMG) based time (amplitude and latency) and frequency domain measures; and (3) response to specific evoked potentials (EPs) that are affected under cognitive tasks, mental state changes, mood variation, presence of depression, and/or presence of different levels of pain. Additional examples of the one or more neuron/brain measures can be found in Table 1 (e.g., under “Neuron/Brain Measures”). In various embodiments, physiological parameter generator 216 can generate any one or any combination of these examples as the one or more physiological parameters. Examples of the one or more chemical or analyte parameters can include parameters derived from the patient's blood, sweat, saliva, breath, tissue, etc. Additional examples one or more chemical or analyte parameters can be found in Table 1 (e.g., under “Biochemical Measures”).


In various embodiments, one or more functional signal sensors 218 can sense one or more functional signals, and can each be a non-invasive, percutaneous, or implantable sensor. Functional signal sensing circuit 220 can process the one or more functional signals. Functional parameter generator 222 can generate the one or more functional parameters using the processed one or more functional signals. Examples of the one or more functional signals can include measures of (1) movement (e.g., activity level, gait pattern, range of motion, or sleep) and (2) posture. Additional examples of the one or more functional parameters can be found in Table 1 (e.g., under “Functional Measures”). In various embodiments, physiological parameter generator 222 can generate any one or any combination of these examples as the one or more functional parameters.


In various embodiments, patient information input device 224 can receive patient information related to pain. Patient information processing circuit 226 can process the patient information. Patient parameter generator 228 can generate one or more patient parameters using the processed patient information. Examples of the one or more patient parameters can (1) parameters derived from input from the patient such as perceived pain levels, mood, and stress levels (including external interactions, such as interactions with another person) as a way to quantify non-physical activity); and (2) parameters derived from the patient's medical history record (e.g., demographic data, diagnoses, procedures applied, and prescriptions). Some additional examples of the parameters derived from the patient's medical history record can be found in Table 1 (e.g., under “Biochemical Measures”). In various embodiments, patient parameter generator 228 can generate any one or any combination of these examples as the one or more patient parameters.



FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a pain management system 330 and portions of an environment in which system 330 operates. System 330 can include sensors 332, a portable device 334, a network 338 communicatively coupled to portable device 334 via a communication link 336, and a medical facility 340 communicatively coupled to network 338. A pain monitoring circuit such as pain monitoring circuit 210 can be distributed in sensors 332 and portable device 334. In various embodiments, portable device 334 can be implemented as a dedicated device or in a generic device such as a smartphone, a laptop computer, or a tablet computer.


For example, sensors 332 may include at least one sensor of physiological sensor(s) 212 and one sensor of functional signal sensor(s) 218, and portable device 334 can include the remaining components of pain monitoring circuit 210. The composite pain score as well as other data acquired by portable device 334 can be transmitted to network 338 via communication link 336 to be stored, further analyzed, and/or inform the patient's healthcare provider. When the composite pain score and/or the other data indicate that the patient needs medical attention, a notification will be transmitted to medical facility 340 from network 338. In various embodiments, sensor(s) 332 can include external, percutaneous, and/or implantable sensors that communicate with portable device 334 via wired and/or wireless links, and communication link 336 can be a wired or wireless link.



FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of a method 400 for pain management. In one embodiment, system 330 is configured to perform method 400 for a patent.


At 402, one or more physiological parameters and one or more functional parameters are generated. The one or more physiological parameters are each indicative of a physiological function or state of the patient. The one or more functional parameters are each indicative of a physical activity or state of the patient. Examples of such one or more physiological parameters can include the physiological parameters that can be generated by physiological parameter generator 216 as discussed above with reference to FIG. 2 and Table 1. Examples of such one or more functional parameters can include the functional parameters that can be generated by functional parameter generator 222 as discussed above with reference to FIG. 2 and Table 1.


Optionally at 404, patient input is received. Optionally at 406, patient history is received. The received patient input and/or patient history include one or more patient parameters related to the pain of the patient. Examples of such one or more patient parameters can include the patient parameters that can be generated by patient parameter generator 228 as discussed above with reference to FIG. 2 and Table 1. In various embodiments, the one or more patient parameters can include one or more parameters directly entered by the patient or another person attending the patient as well as one or more parameters derived from information entered by the patient or another person attending the patient and the patient's medical history. In one embodiment, the one or more patient parameters includes a parameter representative of intensity of the pain specified by the patient based on his or her perception of the pain.


At 408, the parameters generated and/or received at 402, 404, and 406 are analyzed. In various embodiments, the analysis can result in a signal metric using one or more physiological parameters, one or more functional parameters, and/or the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, the analysis results in the signal metric using at least one parameter selected from the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, or the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, the analysis results in the signal metric using at least two parameters selected from the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, or the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, the analysis results in the signal metric using at least one physiological parameter and one functional parameter. In one embodiment, the analysis results in the signal metric using at least two parameters selected from a physiological parameter, a functional parameter, and a patient parameter. In one embodiment, the analysis results in the signal metric using the one or more physiological parameters and the one or more functional parameters. In one embodiment, the analysis results in the signal metric using the one or more physiological parameters and the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, the analysis results in produces the signal metric using the one or more functional parameters and the one or more patient parameters. In one embodiment, the analysis results in produces the signal metric using the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, and the one or more patient parameters.


In various embodiments, weighting factors can be generated, and the signal metric can be produced using the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, and/or the one or more patient parameters with the weighting factors each applied to one of these parameters. In another embodiment, one or more of the one or more physiological parameters, the one or more functional parameters, and the one or more patient parameters are preprocessed to extract relevant pain information features before generating the weighting factors to be applied to these features. In another embodiment, the weighting factors are generated using one or more machine learning techniques such as neural network, fuzzy logic, support vector machines, and/or generalized linear or non-linear regressions.


At 410, a composite pain score is computed. In various embodiments, the composite pain score can be computed using the signal metric. In various embodiments, additional parameters such as environmental parameters and time can be used in computing the composite pain score, such as by including in the analysis that results in the signal metric. The environmental parameters, such as temperature, humidity, and/or air pressure, may influence discernment of pain. In various embodiments, such environmental parameters can be measured by system 300 and/or obtained from weather forecasts based on location (e.g., specified manually or using a global positioning system) to anticipate or predict their impact to the composite pain score. One or more weighting factors can be determined based on the reliability of these environmental parameters (e.g., depending on how they are obtained) and applied in computing the composite pain score. Time of day may capture circadian influence on pain. There are still additional parameters that can affect pain, and can be used in computing the composite pain score, such as by including in the analysis that results in the signal metric. Examples can include, but are not limited to, amount and/or quality of sleep (e.g., as measured by system 330), amount and/or type of activity during a preceding period of time (e.g., the previous day or week, and measured by system 330), personal events that may have positive impact or negative impact on pain, medication changes, time of year (e.g., birthday and holidays), personal events that may have positive impact or negative impact on pain (e.g., church and socialization activities making for consistent good moods on Sunday with a let down on Monday, as monitored and recognized as a pattern by system 330), and/or deviation from patterns determined by system 330 (e.g., regular activity around lunch time because walking to a cafeteria stops due to changes in pain perception not identified by other parameters). In one embodiment, the signal metric is trended, and the composite pain score is computed based on the trend.


At 412, the algorithm used to compute the composite pain score is calibrated. In various embodiments, the calibration can include adjusting the one or more weighting factors manually, automatically by learning and adapting to the patient's circumstances and conditions over time, and/or adjusting the weighting factors based on changes in the physiological and functional parameters. The weighting factors can be adjusted according to a calibration schedule or as needed. In various embodiments, the calibration can be a continuous process. For example, calibration can be performed over the course of minutes or longer, e.g., days, to encompass a range of activities. Calibration can be a prompted activity or scheduled to occur intermittently, for example. Different weighting factors can be used for various activities, such as sleeping and walking. In various embodiments, the weighting factor can be linear or non-linear in nature.


At 414, whether medical intervention is required is determined, such as by comparing the composite pain score to one or more thresholds. If intervention is not required as determined at 414, the one or more physiological parameters and one or more functional parameters are generated again (i.e., their values are updated) for continued monitoring of the patient.


At 416, the result of the computation, including at least the composite pain score, is displayed to the patient or a caregiver. At 418, if intervention is required as determined at 414, relevant medical personnel is notified for appropriate action that can be dependent on the composite pain score. Examples of the appropriate action can include instructing the patient to take medication, instructing the patient to visit a clinic, or sending medical personnel to visit the patient.



FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a pain management system 530 and portions of an environment in which system 530 operates. System 530 can include an implantable medical device 542, a portable device 534 communicatively coupled to implantable medical device 542 via a wireless communication link 544, network 338 communicatively coupled to portable device 534 via communication link 336, and medical facility 340 communicatively coupled to network 338. A pain monitoring circuit such as pain monitoring circuit 210 can be distributed in implantable medical device 542 and portable device 534, and implantable medical device 542 can deliver one or more pain relief therapies. In various embodiments, portable device 534 can be implemented as a dedicated device or in a generic device such as a smartphone, a laptop computer, or a tablet computer.


For example, implantable medical device 542 may include at least one sensor of physiological sensor(s) 212 and one sensor of functional signal sensor(s) 218, and portable device 534 can include the remaining components of pain monitoring circuit 210. The composite pain score as well as other data acquired by portable device 534 can be transmitted to network 338 via communication link 336 to be stored, further analyzed, inform the patient's healthcare provider, and/or used to control delivery of one or more pain relief therapies from implantable medical device 542. When the composite pain score and/or the other data indicate that the patient needs medical attention, such as when system 530 is unable to automatically adjust the one or more pain relief therapies for a satisfactory result as indicated by the composite pain score, a notification will be transmitted to medical facility 340 from network 338.



FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a method 600 for pain management. In one embodiment, system 530 is configured to perform method 600 for a patent. Method 600 can be performed for monitoring pain of the patient and delivering one or more pain relief therapies to the patient with closed-loop control. As illustrated in FIG. 6, method 600 includes steps 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, and 412 of method 400.


At 614, the composite pain score is compared to a therapy threshold indicating a need for adjusting a pain relief therapy. If the composite pain score does not exceed the therapy threshold as determined at 614, the one or more physiological parameters and one or more functional parameters are generated again (i.e., their values are updated) for continued monitoring of the patient. Examples of the pain relief therapy can include neuromodulation therapies (e.g., SCS, PNS, DBS, and TMS) and drug therapies.


At 616, when the composite pain score exceeds the therapy threshold as determined at 614, the pain relief therapy is adjusted. The adjustment can include starting a therapy, increasing intensity (e.g., neurostimulation energy or drug dose), switching to a different type therapy, or adjusting any therapy parameters. Examples of therapy parameters for various types of neuromodulation therapies can include pulse frequency, burst frequency, pulse width, waveform shape, anode/cathode configurations, and current fractionalization.


At 618, whether the composite pain score exceeds a notification threshold is determined. At 620, if the pain exceeds the notification threshold as determined at 618, relevant medical personnel is notified for appropriate action that may be dependent on the composite pain score and/or the record of delivery of the pain relief therapy. Examples of the appropriate action can include instructing the patient to take medication, instructing the patient to visit a clinic, or sending medical personnel to visit the patient. If the pain does not exceed, the notification threshold as determined at 618, no notification to relevant medical personnel is necessary. In any case, the one or more physiological parameters and one or more functional parameters are continued to be generated (i.e., their values are updated) for continued assessment of the patient pain level.



FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of an implantable medical device 742, which represents an example of implantable medical device 542. Implantable medical device 742 can include a pain monitoring circuit 710, an implant communication circuit 752, and a pain relief device 754. Pain monitoring circuit 710 represents an example of pain monitoring circuit 210 as implemented in an implantable medical device. When the one or more patient parameters are used by pain analyzer 100, patient information input device 224 can receive the patient information from an external device communicatively coupled to implantable medical device 742 via communication link 544.


Implant control circuit 746 controls the operation of implantable medical device 742 and can include a communication controller 748 and a therapy controller 750. Communication controller 748 can control transmission of the composite pain score the external device, such as on a periodical basis or according to another specified schedule, when the composite pain score exceeds a specified threshold, when change in the composite pain score exceeds a specified threshold, or when the rate of change in the composite pain score exceeds a specified threshold. Therapy controller 750 can control the delivery of the one or more pain-relief therapies using the composite pain score and therapy parameters. Implant communication circuit 752 allow implantable medical device 742 to communicate with the external device via communication link 544. Pain relief device 754 can deliver one or more pain-relief therapies. In various embodiments, pain relief device 754 can include a neuromodulator to deliver electrical stimulation (such as SCS, PNS, DBS, and/or TMS) and/or a drug pump to deliver one or more pain suppression agents.



FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of an external device 834, such as may be implemented in portable device 534. External device 834 can include an external user interface 856, an external control circuit 862, and an external communication circuit 868. In various embodiments, external device 834 can be implemented in a portable device such as a hand-held or wearable device.


External user interface 856 can include a user input device 858 and a presentation device 860. User input device 858 can receive patient information such as a subjective input from the patient to indicate the degree of the pain as perceived by the patient. Presentation device 860 can include a display screen and/or other audio and/or visual presentation devices. In one embodiment, a touchscreen is used as user input device 858 and presentation device 860. External control circuit 862 controls operation of external device 834 and can include a notification controller 864 and a therapy controller 866. Notification controller 864 can receive the composite pain score from implantable medical device 742, produce a notification using the composite pain score, determine one or more recipients of the notification using the composite pain score, and control delivery of the notification to each of the one or more recipients. The recipients can include the patient and/or various users of a pain management system such as system 530. In various embodiments, notification controller 864 can present the notification using presentation device 860. The notification can include the composite pain score, one or more indicators representing the pain score, an alert or alarm message regarding the patient's pain state, and/or instructions for actions to be taken by the patient. In various embodiments, notification controller 864 can produce and present the notification when the composite pain score exceeds a specified threshold, when change in the composite pain score exceeds a specified threshold, or when the rate of change in the composite pain score exceeds a specified threshold. Therapy controller 866 can produce external commands for adjusting the therapy parameters using the composite pain score and the patient information and transmit the external commands to implantable medical device 742 via communication link 544. External communication circuit 868 allow external device 834 to communicate with implantable medical device 742 via communication link 544 and to communicate with a remote device via communication link 336.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a remote device 970, such as may be implemented in network 338 and/or medical facility 340. Remote device 970 can be used for patient monitoring and therapy control, and can include a remote user interface 972, a remote control circuit 978, and a remote communication circuit 984.


Remote user interface 972 can include a user input device 974 and a presentation device 976. User input device 974 can receive patient information such as patient history stored in network 338 and/or medial facility 340, and can also receive user commands for adjusting the one or more pain-relief therapies. Such user command may be determined based on updated knowledge about the patient's conditions and/or results of one or more pain-relief therapies received by the patient. Presentation device 976 can include a display screen and/or other audio and/or visual presentation devices. In one embodiment, a touchscreen is used as user input device 974 and presentation device 976. Remote control circuit 978 can include a notification controller 980 and a therapy controller 982. Notification controller 980 can receive the notification transmitted from external device 834, determine one or more further recipients of the notification, and control delivery of the notification to each of the one or more further recipients. Such further recipients can include physicians and/or other caregivers attending the patient, a hospital, and a medical emergency response facility. Therapy controller 982 can produce remote commands for adjusting the delivery of the one or more pain-relief therapies using the notification and the user commands. In various embodiments, therapy controller 866 of external device 834 can produce the external commands using the composite pain score, the patient information, and the remote commands. Remote communication circuit 984 can communicate with external device 834 via communication 336 and network 338.


In various embodiments, circuits of the present pain management system, including its various embodiments discussed in this document, may be implemented using a combination of hardware and software. For example, the circuits may be implemented using an application-specific circuit constructed to perform one or more particular functions or a general-purpose circuit programmed to perform such function(s). Such a general-purpose circuit includes, but is not limited to, a microprocessor or a portion thereof, a microcontroller or portions thereof, and a programmable logic circuit or a portion thereof.


It is to be understood that the above detailed description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading and understanding the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.









TABLE 1







Parameters indicative of level of pain.










Bio-marker

Signals Sensed



(Parameter)
Physiology/Definition
(Examples only)
References










Autonomic Measures










Heart Rate (HR)
Indicator of sympathetic tone.
ECG, PPG
1, 2



Higher HR indicates higher



sympathetic nervous activity (SNA)


Heart Rate
Measure of autonomic balance.
ECG, PPG
3, 4, 5, 6, 7,


Variability (HRV)
Autonomic dysfunction at the base

8, 9, 10



of many disease states. Appears to



be a reliable marker for adaptive



stress, including both dynamic and



cumulative load. Acute stress and



chronic stress both lower HRV


AVNN
Average of all NN intervals
ECG, PPG


SDNN
Standard deviation of all NN
ECG, PPG



intervals (Measure of long term



HRV)


SDANN
Standard deviation of the averages
ECG, PPG



of NN intervals in all 5-minute



segments of a 24-hour recording



(Measure of long term HRV)


SDNNIDX
Mean of the standard deviations of
ECG, PPG



NN intervals in all 5-minute



segments of a 24-hour recording


RMSSD
Square root of the mean of the
ECG, PPG



squares of differences between



adjacent NN intervals. (Measure of



short term HRV)


pNN50
Percentage of differences between
ECG, PPG



adjacent NN intervals that are



greater than 50 ms.


vLF
Total spectral power of all NN
ECG, PPG



intervals between 0.003 and 0.04 Hz


LF
Total spectral power of all NN
ECG, PPG



intervals between 0.04 and 0.15 Hz


HF
Total spectral power of all NN
ECG, PPG



intervals between 0.15 and 0.4 Hz


LF/HF
Ratio of low to high frequency
ECG, PPG



power


total power
total spectral power of al NN
ECG, PPG



intervals up to 0.4 Hz


UsEn
Ultra-short entropy (UsEn) is a
ECG, PPG



nonlinear approach that is thought



to offer an insight into the overall



structure of the HR regulatory



system with a connection between



disorder and a decrease in entropy


alpha 1
Short term fractal scaling exponent
ECG, PPG



measures the qualitative



characteristics and correlation



features of HR behavior.


Galvanic Skin
SNA causes sweat glands to fill up
Electrodes on
11, 12, 13,


Response (GSR)
and skin conductance increases
the hand,
14



creating skin conductance
measure



fluctuations.
conductivity


Photo-
Reduction in the amplitude of PPG
PPG
15, 16, 17,


Plethysmographic
is caused by peripheral

18


(PPG)
vasoconstriction and the



nociception response during



general anesthesia.



Vasoconstriction as a result of



increased SNA.


Pulse Rate
Could be a replacement measure
PPG
19, 20, 21


Variability (PRV)
for HRV. Can be used to estimate



HRV at rest.


Blood Pressure
Marker of sympathetic ton.
PPG
22, 23 24,


(BP)
Increased ton causes

25



vasoconstriction and thus elevated



BP. Increased BP is associated with



increased pain levels


Pulse Transit Time
Vasoconstriction is a physiological
PPG, possible
26, 27, 28


& Pulse Wave
response to pain which directly
internal sensor


Amplitude
impacts the pulse transit time and
(at 2 locations to


(Alternative
pulse wave amplitude. In the
measure transit


measure for BP)
presence of painful stimuli, both
time)



pulse transit time and pulse wave



amplitude decrease.


Respiration Rate
Measure of sympathetic tone.
ECG, embedded
29, 30, 31,


(RR)
Elevated respiratory rate
strain gauge



corresponds to increased pain.


Pupil Diameter
Dilation of the pupil is indicative of
*Imaging
 32



sympathetic activation


Respiratory Sinus
RSA is a physiological indicator

33, 34, 35,


Arrhythmia (RSA)
that may have implications for

36, 37



responses to pain and stress. It is



essentially the transfer function



from respiration rate to R-R



intervals. Another way to assess



cardiac autonomic function. Pain is



associated with an impairment of



neurocardiac integrity which can be



measured through RSA which



decreases in the presence of



increased sympathetic activity/



decreased parasympathetic activity.


Baroreceptor
Increased baroreceptor response is
BP monitoring
38, 39, 40,


Sensitivity
associated with decreased pain

41, 42, 43,



levels.

44, 45, 46,





47


Normalized Pulse
Sympathetic tone causes vascular
Measured in the
48, 49


Volume (NPV)
constriction. This vascular tone can
outer ear or at



be measured in several locations on
the finger tip



the body to indicate sympathetic



tone. NPV can be derived from the



fingertip using PPG. It can also be



derived from the bottom of the ear



canal.







Functional Measures










Activity
Measuring activity in patients with
Accelerometer
50, 51, 52



pain can be an indicator of pain



level with patients in severe pain



participating in less activity


Timed up-and-go
Faster up-and-go time (shorter time
Accelerometer



to complete task), less discomfort



and able to move more quickly.


Physical activity
Increased physical activity is a sign
Accelerometer



of decreased discomfort


Gait
Patients with pain may have altered
Accelerometer/
53, 54, 55,



gait due to pain, such as a limp.
gyroscope
56, 57, 58,


Velocity
set distance to walk divided by time
Accelerometer/
59, 60,



it takes to walk the set distance
gyroscope


Stride Length
linear distance between the
Accelerometer/



placement of both feet
gyroscope


Swing Time
time from the moment the foot lifts
Accelerometer/



from the floor until it touches again
gyroscope


Single Limb
time from when the heel touches
Accelerometer/


Support Time
the flood until toes are lifted
gyroscope


Gait autonomy
maximum time a person can walk,
Accelerometer/



taking into account the number and
gyroscope



duration of stops


Trunk-Pelvis
Altered gait patterns are observed
Gyroscope


Rotation, balance
in patients with pain. Due to



pain/discomfort, the coordination



of the trunk and pelvis rotations



vary from healthy subjects. In a



healthy person, pelvis-thorax



coordination in the transverse plane



evolves gradually from in-phase



coordination towards antiphase



coordination with increasing



walking velocity. In patients with



pain these movements are more



rigid and less flexible coordination.


Facial expressions
Particular facial expressions/cues
Imaging
 61



are associated with pain (Facial



Action Units) such as nose



wrinkling and cheek-raising


Sleep Quality
Poor sleep quality is often observed
accelerometer,
62, 63, 64,



when patients are in pain. More
subjective
65



movement and wakefulness during



sleep.


Quality of
Quality of life/mood can affect pain
subjective
 66


Life/Mood (Can be
score. Better mood can decrease


subjective or
pain perception/intensity


objective)


Stress - Subjective
Stress levels can greatly affect
ECG (HRV),
67, 68,


measure
HRV and sympathetic tone.
subjective







Neuron/Brain Measures










Quantitative
Method used to assess damage to
Neurometer
69, 70, 71,


Sensory Test (QST)
the small nerve endings, which

72, 73, 74,



detect changes in temperature, and

75, 76



large nerve endings, which detect



vibration


Warm
Heat stimuli, subject reports
Neurometer



temperature change or heat pain



threshold


Cold
Cold stimuli, subject reports
Neurometer



temperature change or cold pain



threshold


Vibration
Measure sensation/sensitivity to
Neurometer



vibration. Set frequency and change



amplitude to detect



threshold/sensitivity


Current Perception
Also known as sensory nerve
Neurometer


Threshold (CPT)
conduction threshold testing.



Entails the quantification of the



sensory threshold to transcutaneous



electrical stimulation. CPT measure



represents the minimal amount of



painless, neuroselective



transcutaneous electrical stimulus



required to reproducibly evoke a



sensation.


Pain Perception
PPT represents the minimum
Neurometer


Threshold (PPT)
current intensity that produced pain


Pain Tolerance
PTT measure is the maximum
Neurometer


Threshold (PTT)
amount of neuroselective electrical



stimulus that a subject can tolerate


Tactile
Stimulation of the index finger with
Neurometer


Discrimination
assessments of 2-point


Threshold
discrimination thresholds as a



marker for tactile perception.


EEG
Increased activity in the pain matrix
EEG
77, 78, 79,



of patients in a high pain state

80



versus low pain state


Spectral Power
Increased spectral power is
EEG



attributable to theta over activity.


Dominant
Increased peak height and
EEG


Frequency (DF)
decreased DF due to slowed



rhythmicity in EEG in neuropathic



pain.


(Contact) Heat EPs
Uses rapidly delivered heat pulses
EEG
81, 82, 83,



with adjustable peak temperatures

84



to stimulate the differential



heat/warm thresholds of receptors



expressed by the A-delta and C.



Believed to be composed of at least



2 overlapping components. Some



theorize that it reflects the degree



of discomfort or unpleasantness



thus reflecting the emotional-



motivational aspect. Provides a



useful neurophysiologic tool for



studying the emotions associated



with pain


Somatosensory EPs
Electrical signal is nervous system
EEG



in response to a sensory stimuli.



Consists of a series of waves that



reflect sequential activation of



neural structures along



somatosensory pathways


EMG
Reflect endogenous processing of
EMG



pain information in response to



external stimuli.


Neurophysical test
P40-SEP amplitude, H-reflex
EMG, Reporter
 85



amplitude, RIII reflex threshold,
EMG-EP



and RIII reflex area. Neurophysical
machine



tests detect and record the electrical



potential generated by muscle cells



when they are activated. These



signals can be analyzed to detect



medical abnormalities or to analyze



the biomechanics of movement.


Spinal Stability,
EMG activity is elevated in low
EMG, sEMG
86, 87, 88,


Lumbar EMG
back pain patients especially during
(surface EMG)
89, 90, 91,



dynamic movements. This

92



increased could be due to restricted



range of motion and/or a



compensatory mechanism to



maintain stability. It is widely



accepted that there is a relationship



between pain, stiffness, and muscle



activity in low back pain patients.


Nociceptive
Nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) is
sEMG on the
93, 94, 95,


Flexion Reflex/
a physiological, polysynaptic reflex
bicep femoris
96, 97


Nociceptive
allowing for painful stimuli to
muscle


Withdrawal Reflex
activate an appropriate withdrawal



response. To capture this response,



the sural nerve is stimulated and the



EMG response is recorded at the



bicep femoris muscle. This



stimulation elicits 2 reflex



responses: (1) RII reflex which has



a short latency, low activation



threshold, and is a tactile reflex and



(2) RIII reflex which has a longer



latency, higher activation threshold,



and is the nociceptive reflex. RIII is



the focus of the NFR correlations



with pain. The measured parameter



is the NFR threshold (amplitude of



stimulation necessary to activate



RIII) for activation, which has



shown to directly correlate to



perceived pain.


MSNA
Muscle sympathetic nerve activity.
EMG
98, 99, 100,



Variance in MSNA may be

101



associated with cardiac output with



a negative relationship observed



between MSNA and cardiac output.



MSNA can influence HRV. MSNA



could be used as an indicator of



autonomic activity.


Default-Mode
Proposed theory is that long-term
EEG, fMRI
102, 103


Network (DMN)
pain alters the functional



connectivity of cortical regions



known to be active at rest. In



chronic pain patients, these regions



are associated with more activity,



unable to deactivate.


Gray Matter
Pain can lead to long term changes
MRI
104, 105


Volume
in the brain including changes in



the volume of gray matter. GMV



changes are region dependent.



Changes seen are not necessarily in



regions of the brain correlated with



pain


MEG Theta
Increased total power in the theta
MEG
106, 107


Activity (Power)
range (7-9 Hz) is associated with



increased pain state


MR Spectroscopy
MRS can be used to detect
MR
108


Metabolites
alterations in the biochemistry in
spectroscopy



the brain associated with chronic



pain - in regions associated with



pain. Distinct patterns were



observed between painful and



painless states.







Biochemical Measures










Cytokine Profile
Increased pro-inflammatory
Blood draw
109



cytokines and decreased anti-



inflammatory cytokines can



increase pain/discomfort


pro-
TNFa - applied to peripheral nerve
Blood draw


inflammatory
fibers in vitro and in-vivo



experiments leads to increased



electrical activity in patients with



pain. Increased TNFa in the blood



and thus endoneural environment



might also lead to increased C-fiber



activity and sensation of pain.



IL-2 - has shown both analgesic



and algetic effects. Elevated levels



associated with pro-algetic effect.


anti-
IL-4, IL-10. Roles in down
Blood draw


inflammatory
regulating the production of pro-



inflammatory cytokines.



Heightened IL-4 & IL-10 protein



may reflect a natural analgesic



system regulating the activity and



sensitivity of the endogenous



opioid system.


Biochemical
Neurotensin, oxytocin and cortisol
Blood draw
110, 111,


Markers
levels were increased after

112, 113



intervention (cervical and spinal



manipulation). This response



occurred immediately after



intervention and the differences



between the intervention and



control groups were gone at 2 hours



after intervention



MDA (malondialdehyde) is a



marker of oxidative stress and is



increased in pain states



DMS (dimethylsphingosine) is a



small molecule byproduct of



cellular membranes in the nervous



system. This study was performed



in rats where elevated levels of



DMS were seen in rats with



neuropathic pain.



Biochemical mechanisms of



chronic pain and fatigue. Chronic



pain subjects had a reduction in



serum sodium, increase in levels of



markers of tissue damage (ALT



(alanine aminotrasaminate) and



AST (aspartate aminotransferase))



and an increase in the tyrosine:leucine



ratio which represents



alterations in protein turnover.



Lactic acid and proteoglycans



(metabolic markers)


GABA
Evidence that GABA transmission

114



is involved in the inhibition of



dysesthesia, allodynia, and other



signs of neuropathic pain


P2X4 Receptor
After nerve injury P2X4 receptors

115


Expression Levels
are upregulated in spinal microglia



by several factors at the



transcriptional and translational



levels increase HR and BP are



associated with increased burst



amplitude but not in all patients.



May have implications for



individual differences in CV



consequences of CP.


Salivary
Levels of interleukin (IL)1a, IL8,
Saliva
116, 117


neuropeptide/
AgRP, cortisol, monocyte


cytokine/hormone
chemotactic protein-1 (MCP1),


detection
dynorphin A, prolactin, valine,



proline, hypoxanthine, propionate,



formate, and acetate in saliva



samples could be used to



distinguish between patients with



and without pain.



Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal



(HPA) axis, one of the main bodily



stress systems, function has been



found to be reduced in chronic pain



patients. Salivary cortisol is



commonly used to assess HPA axis



function. Epinephrine and



norepinephrine levels could



potentially be used.


glial cell-derived
Concentrations of glial cell-derived
CSF
119


neurotrophic factor
neurotrophic factor in cerebrospinal



fluid (CSF) have been shown to be



higher in neuropathic pain patients.


Neuropeptide
CSF levels of nociceptin/orphanin
CSF
120


ligand:
(N/OFQ) have been found to be


nociceptin/orphanin
lower in patients treated with


(N/OFQ)
morphine than those not being



treated with morphine.


Structural nerve
Patients with sciatica and lumbar
CSF
120


proteins
disc herniation have shown high



CSF levels of neurofilament protein



and S-100 protein, which are



indicators of axonal damage and



Schwann cell injury.


Markers of
Intervertebral disc damage has been
Blood draw
120


collagen
shown to be correlated with an


metabolism
increase in collagen metabolism,



which can be monitored using



serum markers such as PICP and



CTX.


cystatin C
Upregulation of cystatin C has been
CSF
120



demonstrated in animal models of



pain, and higher levels of cystatin C



has been found in CSF samples of



patients in pain compared to those



not in pain.


Purines
Fibromyalgia patients show
Blood draw
123



abnormal profile of purines in



plasma based on activity of



enzymes involved in purine



metabolism (adenosine deaminase,



dipeptidyl peptidase IV and prolyl



endopeptidase).


Peripheral tissue
Peripheral pain mediators are
Blood draw;
121


markers
released in response to damage or
Tissue Biopsy



disease, and induce sensitization



leading to chronic pain. Examples



include:



Prostanoids



Cytokines TNFα and IL-1β



Nerve growth factor (NGF)



Chemokines including



CCL2, CCL3, and CXCL5


CNS plasticity
Central sensitization is another step
Blood draw;
121


markers
in the process leading to chronic
Tissue Biopsy



pain, and is mediated by NMDA



receptors.


Gene Expression
Altered gene expression is
Blood draw;
121, 122



associated with chronic pain.
Tissue Biopsy



Affected genes include:



Nociceptors (e.g., TrpV1,



TrpA1, GABA-B1, 5-



HT3A)



Ion channels regulating



nociceptor excitability (e.g.,



Nav1.8 and other sodium



channel subunits, potassium



channel subunits)



Transmitters and



modulators released



centrally (e.g., substance P,



BDNF, neuropeptide Y)



μ-opioid receptor



Genes involved in GABA



synthesis (e.g., GAD65,



GAD67, GABA-B1)



Human genetic studies have shown



a correlation between GTP



cyclohydrolase 1 polymorphisms,



which decrease tetrahydrobiopterin



(BH4) levels, and reduced pain in



patients. Furthermore, excessive



BH4 is produced after nerve injury



in mice, and blocking the BH4



production reduces



hypersensitivity.


Epigenetic
Epigenetic modifications is
Blood draw;
121


modifications
associated with the development of
Tissue Biopsy



chronic pain



Histone acetylation



 Histone deacetylase



 (HDAC) inhibitors



 (compounds that



 prevent the removal of



 acetyl groups from



 histones) can mitigate



 symptoms in animal



 models of inflammatory



 diseases (e.g., arthritis,



 colitis, and hepatitis),



 has also been shown to



 have clinical benefits



 arthritis



DNA methylation



 Methyl binding protein



 MeCP2 has been shown



 to promote abnormal



 upregulation of a group



 of genes in



 inflammatory pain



 conditions



 intervertebral disc



 degeneration, and the



 chronic pain associated



 with it, has been shown



 to correlate with



 increases in methylation



 at the SPARC gene



 promoter in both mice



 and humans.



REST



 REST promoter binding



 is directly responsible



 for reduced expression



 of several genes known



 to be relevant for



 nociceptive processing



 in the DRG (e.g., μ-



 opioid receptor, Nav1.8,



 Kv4.3).
















TABLE 2





Abbreviations used in Table 1.


















BP
Blood Pressure



BPV
Blood Pressure Variability



CP
Chronic Pain



CPT
Current Perception Threshold



CV
Cardiovascular



EEG
Electroencephalography



EMG
Electromyography



EP
Evoked Potential



FM
Fibromyalgia



GSR
Galvanic Skin Response



HR
Heart Rate



HRV
Heart Rate Variability



LBP
Low Back Pain



MSNA
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity



NPV
Normalized Pulse Volume



NS
Not significant



OPS
Objective Pain Score



PA
Plethysmogram Amplitude



PPG
Plethysmogram



PPT
Pain Perception Threshold



PTT
Pain Tolerance Threshold



QST
Quantitative Sensory Testing



RSA
Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia



SC
Skin Conductance



SCS
Spinal Cord Stimulation



SNA
Sympathetic Nervous Activity



UsEn
Ultra-short Entropy

















TABLE 3





References cited in Table 1.
















1
TERKELSEN, ASTRID J., et al., “Heart Rate Variability in Complex



Regional Pain Syndrome during Rest and Mental and Orthostatic Stress”,



Anesthesiology, Vol. 116, No. 1, (January 2012), 133-146


2
HALLMAN, DAVID, et al., “Autonomic regulation, physical activity and



perceived stress in subjects with musculoskeletal pain: 24-hour ambulatory



monitoring”, International Journal of Psychophysiology 86, (2012), 276-282


3
KOENIG, JULIAN, et al., “Chronic Pain and Heart Rate Variability in a



Cross-Sectional Occupational Sample Evidence for Impaired Vagal Control”,



The Clinical Journal of Pain, Publish Ahead of Print, (2015), 31 pgs


4
STAUD, ROLAND, “Heart rate variability as a biomarker of fibromyalgia



syndrome”, Fut Rheumatol 3 (5) - NIH Public Access, (10/01/08), 475-483


5
CINAZ, BURCU, et al., “Monitoring of mental workload levels during an



everyday life office-work scenario”, Pers Ubiquit Comput 17, (2013), 229-239


6
SAY, MUSA, et al., “Responses of Heart Rate Variability to Acute Pain



After Minor Spinal Surgery: Optimal Thresholds and Correlation With the



Numeric Rating Scale”, J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, Vol. 00, No. 00, (2014), 1-7


7
HALLMAN, DAVID M., et al., “Changes in physical activity and heart rate



variability in chronic neck-shoulder pain: monitoring during work and



leisure time”, Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87, (2014), 735-744


8
ZHANG, JOHN, “Effect of Chiropractic Care on Heart Rate Variability and



Pain in a Multisite Clinical Study”, Jimmal of Manipulative and



Physiological Therapeutics, Vol. 29, No. 4, (2006), 267-274


9
WILLIAMS, DEWAYNE P., et al., “Effects of Chronic Pelvic Pain on Heart



Rate Variability in Women”, The Journal of Urology, Vol. 194,, (November



2015), 1-6


10
EVANS, SUBHADR, et al., “Heart rate variability as a biomarker for



autonomic nervous system response differences between children with



chronic pain and healthy control children”, Journal of Pain Research 3.6,



(2013), 449-457


11
VILLAREJO, VIQUEIRA MARIA, et al., “A Stress Sensor Based on



Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) Controlled by ZigBee”, Sensors 12, (2012),



6075-6101


12
STORM, H., et al., “Skin conductance correlates with perioperative stress”,



Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46, (2002), 887-895


13
BAKKER, JORN, et al., “What's your current stress level? Detection of



stress patterns from GSR sensor data”, Eindhoven University of Technology -



The Netherlands, (2011), 1-8


14
LIDBERG, LARS, et al., “Sympathetic Skin Nerve Discharges in Relation lo



Anipliliule ol Skin Resistance Responses”, Psychophysiology, Vol. 18, No.



3, (May 1981), 268-270


15
G, CHIUNG-CHENG, et al., “Photoplethysmography variability as an



alternative approach to obtain heart rate variability information in chronic



pain patient”, J Clin Monit Comput - Published online, (Feb. 24, 2015), 1-6


16
HALLMAN, DAVID M., et al., “Changes in physical activity and heart rate



variability in chronic neck-shoulder pain: monitoring during work and



leisure time”, Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87, (2014), 735-744


17
BOSELLI, E., et al., “Prediction of immediate postoperative pain using the



analgesia/nociception index: a prospective observational study”, British



Journal of Anaesthesia 112 (4):, (2014), 715-721


18
BEN-ISRAEL, NIR, et al., “Monitoring the nociception level: a multi-



parameter approach”, J Clin Monit Comput 27, (2013), 659-668


19
HALLMAN, DAVID M., et al., “Changes in physical activity and heart rate



variability in chronic neck-shoulder pain: monitoring during work and



leisure time”, Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87, (2014), 735-744


20
WONG, JIH-SEN, et al., “A comparative study of pulse rate variability and



heart rate variability in healthy subjects”, J Clin Monit Comput 26, (2012),



107-114


21
CHUANG, CHIUNG-CHENG, et al., “Photoplethysmography variability as



an alternative approach to obtain heart rate variability information in chronic



pain patient”, J Clin Monit Comput - Published online, (Feb. 24, 2015), 1-6


22
SACCO, MARCELLA, et al., “The Relationship Between Blood Pressure



and Pain”, The Journal of Clinical Hypertension Vol. 15, No 8, (August



2013), 600-605


23
STORM, H., et al., “Skin conductance correlates with perioperative stress”,



Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46, (2002), 887-895


24
KOENIG, JULIAN, et al., “Chronic Pain and Heart Rate Variability in a



Cross-Sectional Occupational Sample Evidence for Impaired Vagal Control”,



The Clinical Journal of Pain, Publish Ahead of Print, (2015), 31 pgs


25
ZAMUNER, A. R., et al., “Relationship between sympathetic activity and



pain intensity in fibromyalgia”, Clin Exp Rheumatol 33 - Abstract, [Online].



Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezp3.lib.umn.edu/pubmed/25786044, (February



2015), 1-2


26
VAN VELZEN, MARIT H. N., et al., “Effect of heat-induced pain stimuli on



pulse transit time and pulse wave amplitude in healthy volunteers”,



Physiological Measurement 37, (2016), 52-66


27
KIM, YOUNG UK, et al., “Pulse Transit Time as a Predictor of the Efficacy



of a Celiac Plexus Block in Patients With Chronic Intractable Abdominal



Pain”, Clin J Pain, Vol. 32, No. 6, (June 2015), 522-526


28
KANG, JON-EUN, et al., “Pulse transit time shows vascular changes caused



by propofol in children”, J Clin Monit Comput 29, (2015), 533-537


29
BANOS, ORESTI, et al., “PhysioDroid: Combining Wearable Health



Sensors and Mobile Devices for a Ubiquitous, Continuous, and Personal



Monitoring”, The Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2014 Article ID 190824,



(2014), 11 pgs


30
ZAMUNER, A. R., et al., “Relationship between sympathetic activity and



pain intensity in fibromyalgia”, Clin Exp Rheumatol 33 - Abstract, [Online].



Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezp3.lib.umn.edu/pubmed/25786044, (February



2015), 1-2


31
LEDOWSKI, THOMAS, et al., “The influence of age and sex on the



relationship between heart rate variability, haemodynamic variables and



subjective measures of acute post-operative pain”, European Journal of



Anaesthesiology, Vol. 28, No. 6, (2011), 433-437


32
CHAPMAN, C. RICHARD, et al., “Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious



stimulation in normal volunteers: relationship to brain evoked potentials and



pain report”, (1999), 44-52


33
ARSENAULT, MARIANNE, et al., “Pain Modulation Induced by



Respiration: Phase and Frequency Effects”, Neuroscience 252, (2013), 501-511


34
STURGEON, JOHN A., et al., “Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia: a Marker of



Resilience to Pain Induction”, Int. J. Behav. Med. 21, (2014), 961-965


35
ZAMUNER, ANTONIO R., et al., “Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and its



Association with Pain in Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome”, Pain



Practice, Vol. 16, Issue 6, (2016), 704-711


36
KODITUWAKKU, SANDUN, et al., “Point Process Respiratory Sinus



Arrhythmia Analysis during Deep Tissue Pain Stimulation”, Computing in



Cardiology 38, (2011), 193-196


37
LANE, JAMES D., et al., “Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Cardiovascular



Responses to Stress”, Psychophysiology, Vol. 29, No. 4, (1992), 461-470


38
DUSCHEK, S., “Relationship between baroreceptor cardiac reflex sensitivity



and pain experience in normotensive individuals”, International Journal of



Psychophysiology 65, (2007), 193-200


39
SWENNE, C. A., “Baroreflex sensitivity: mechanisms and measurement”,



Neth Heart J 21, (2013), 58-60


40
Anderson. (2016). Utility of baroreflex sensitivity as a marker of stress.


41
CHUNG, OK Y., “Baroreflex sensitivity associated hypoalgesia in healthy



states is altered by chronic pain”, Pain 138, (2008), 87-97


42
GOUVEIA, S., et al., “Assessing Baroreflex Sensitivity in the Sequences



Technique: Local versus Global Approach”, Computers in Cardiology, 32,



(2005), 279-282


43
Parlow et al. (1995). Spontaneous cardiac baroreflex in humans: comparison



with drug-induced responses


44
Hayano & Yasuma (2003). Hypothesis: respiratory sinus arrhythmia is an



intrinsic resting function of cardiopulmonary system.


45
Heffernan et al. (2007). Arterial stiffness and baroreflex sensitivity following



bouts of aerobic and resistance exercise.


46
Ogoh et al. (2005). Autonomic nervous system influence on arterial



baroreflex control of the heart rate during exercise in humans.


47
Sabharwal et al. (2016). Exercise prevents development of autonomic



dysregulation and hyperalgesia in a mouse model of chronic muscle pain.


48
LEE, JIHYOUNG, et al., “Validation of normalized pulse volume in the



outer ear as a simple measure of sympathetic activity using warm and cold



pressor tests: towards applications in ambulatory monitoring”, Physiol.



Meas. 34, (2013), 359-375


49
SAWADA, YUKIHIRO, et al., “Normalized pulse volume (NPV) derived



photo-plethysmography as a more valid measure of the finger vascular tone”,



International Journal of Psychophysiology 41, (2001), 1-10


50
BARKLEY, JACOB E., et al., “The effect of spinal cord stimulation unit



revision on perceived pain, anxiety, mobility and physical activity in



individuals with low back/lower extremity pain”, Kent State University - The



Spine and Pain Institute, 1 pg. (Dec. 11, 2014)


51
DANSIE, ELIZABETH J., et al., “Activity in Adults with Chronic



Widespread Pain”, The Journal of Pain - Accepted Manuscript, (2014), 33



pgs


52
SATO, KARINA L/, et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Improves



Decreased Physical Activity Induced by Nerve Injury”, Behavioral



Neuroscience, Vol. 128, No. 5, (2014), 625-632


53
KEEFE, FRANCIS J,, et al., “An Objective Approach to Quantifing Pain



Behavior and Gait Patterns in Low Back Pain Patients”, Pain, 21, (1985),



153-161


54
LAMOTH, CLAUDINE J. C., et al., “Pelvis-Thorax Coordination in the



Transverse Plane During Walking in Persons With Nonspecific Low Back



Pain”, SPINE, Vol. 27, No. 4, (2002), E92-E99


55
LAMOTH, CLAUDINE J. C., et al., “How do persons with chronic low back



pain speed up and slow down? Trunk-pelvis coordination and erector spinae



activity during gait”, Gait & Posture 23, (2006), 230-239


56
SIMOES, MARIO A., “Feasibility of Wearable Sensors to Determine Gait



Parameters”, University of South Florida Scholar Commons, (2011), 1-98


57
DE-LA-HERRAN, ALVARO M., et al., “Gait Analysis Methods: An



Overview of Wearable and Non-Wearable Systems, Highlighting Clinical



Applications”, Sensors 14, (2014), 3362-3394


58
TAO, WEIJUN, et al., “Gait Analysis Using Wearable Sensors”, Sensors 12,



(2012), 2255-2283


59
CHENG, QIAN, et al., “GaitTrack: Health Monitoring of Body Motion from



Spatio-Temporal Parameters of Simple Smart Phones”, The ACM



Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Biomed Biomedical



Informatics (BCB) Health Information Symposium (HIS), Sep. 25th,



2013,, (2013), 1-10


60
ALLUM, JOHN H. J., et al., “A speedy solution for balance and gait analysis:



angular velocity measured at the centre of body mass”, Current Opinion in



Neurology 18, (2005), 15-21


61
ZHOU, JING, et al., “Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network Regression



for Continuous Pain Intensity Estimation in Video”, Technical Report,



(May 3, 2016), 1-11


62
SAYAR, KEMAL, et al., “Sleep Quality in Chronic Pain Patients”, Can J.



Psychiatry, Vol. 47, No. 9, (November 2002), 844-848


63
PALERMO, TONYA M., et al., “Subjective Sleep Disturbances in



Adolescents With Chronic Pain: Relationship to Daily Functioning and



Quality of Life”, The Journal of Pain, Vol. 6, No. 3, (March 2995), 201-207


64
ARTNER, JURAJ, et al., “Prevalence of sleep deprivation in patients with



chronic neck and back pain: a retrospective evaluation of 1016 patients”,



Journal of Pain Research: 6, (2013), 1-6


65
RAMINEN, TINA, et al., “The Impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sleep



Patterns”, Neuromodulation 19, (2016), 477-481


66
PALERMO, TONYA M., et al., “Subjective Sleep Disturbances in



Adolescents With Chronic Pain: Relationship to Daily Functioning and



Quality of Life”, The Journal of Pain, Vol. 6, No. 3, (March 2005), 201-207


67
CINAZ, BURCU, et al., “Monitoring of mental workload levels during an



everyday life office-work scenario”, Pers Ubiquit Comput 17, (2013), 229-239


68
BAKKER, JORN, et al., “What's your current stress level? Detection of



stress patterns from GSR sensor data”, Eindhoven University of Technology -



The Netherlands, (2011), 1-8


69
ALO, KENNETH M., et al., “Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory



Nerve Conduction Threshold Functional Measures”, Neuromodulation,



Volume 3, Number 3, (2000), 145-154


70
KEMLER, MARIUS A., et al., “Impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation on



Sensory Characteristics in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 - A



Randomized Trial”, Anesthesiology, 95, (2001), 72-80


71
EISENBERG, ELON, et al., “Quantitative Sensory Testing for Spinal Cord



Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Pain”, (2006), 161-165


72
MIRONER, Y. EUGENE, et al., “Pain Tolerance Threshold: A Pilot Study



of an Objective Measurement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial Results”, Pain



Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 2, (2000), 110-115


73
MAUER, C,, et al., “Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research



Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in



1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes”, Pain 150, (2010),



439-450


74
RASCHE, DIRK, et al., “Quantitative Sensory Testing in Patients With



Chronic Unilateral Radicular Neuropathic Pain and Active Spinal Cord



Stimulation”, Neuromodulation, Vol. 9, No. 3, (2006), 239-247


75
PLEGER, BURKHARD, et al., “Patterns of cortical reorginization parallel



impaired tactile discrimination and pain intensity in complex regional pain



syndrome”, NeuroImage 32, (2006), 503-510


76
MOSELEY, G. LORIMER, et al., “Tactile Discrimination, but not tactile



stimulation alone, reduces chronic limg pain”, Pain 137, (2008), 600-608


77
SCHULZ, ENRICO, et al., “Prefrontal Gamma Oscillations Encode Tonic



Pain in Humans”, Cerebral Cortex 2015, (Mar. 8, 2015), 1-8


78
PRICHEP, LESLIE S., et al., “Evaluation of the Pain Matrix Using EEG



Source Localization: A Feasibility Study”, Pain Medicine 12, (2011), 1241-1248


79
SCHULZ, ENRICO, et al., “Prefrontal Gamma Oscillations Encode Tonic



Pain in Humans”, Cerebral Cortex 2015, (Mar. 8, 2015), 1-8


80
SARNTHEIN, JOHANNES, et al., “Increased EEG power and slowed



dominant frequncy in patients with neurogenic pain”, Brain 129, (2005), 55-64


81
THEUVENEL, PETER J., et al., “Responses to Median and Tbial Nerve



Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Neuropathic Pain”, Brain Topography,



Vol. 11, No. 4, (1999), 306-313


82
GRANOVSKY, YELENA, et al., “Objective Correlate of Subjective Pain



Perception by Contact Heat-Evoked Potentials”, The Journal of Pain, Vol. 9,



No. 1, (January 2008), 53-63


83
PLUIJMS, WOUTER A., et al., “Increased Contact Heat Evoked Potential



Stimulation Latencies in Responders to Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful



Diabetic Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Cord Stimulation for Painful



Diabetic Polyneuropathy”, Neuromodulation 18, (2015), 126-132


84
GRANOVSKY, YELENA, et al., “Objective Correlate of Subjective Pain



Perception by Contact Heat-Evoked Potentials”, The Journal of Pain, Vol. 9,



No. 1, (January 2008), 53-63


85
CIAMPI DE ANDRADE, DANIEL, et al., “Neurophysiological assessment



of spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome”, Pain 150,



(2010), 485-491


86
Hodges et al. (1996). Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine



associated with low back pain: a motor control evaluation of Transversus



Abdominis.


87
AHERN, DAVID K., et al., “Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG



patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls”, Pain,



34, (1988), 153-160


88
PANJABI, MANOHAR, “Clinical spinal instability and low back pain”,



Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 13, (2003), 371-379


89
NEBLETT, RANDY, et al., “What Is The Best Surface EMG Measure of



Lumbar Flexion-Relation for Distinguishing Chronic Low Back Pain



Patients From Pain-Free Controls?”, Clin J Pain 29 (4) - NIH Public Access,



(April 2013), 334-340


90
BENECK, GEORGE J., et al., “Spectral analysis of EMG using



intramuscular electrodes reveals non-linear fatigability characteristics in



persons with chronic low back pain”, Journal of Electromyography and



Kinesiology 23, (2013), 70-77


91
GEISSER, MICHAEL E., et al., “Pain-Related Fear, Lumbar Flexion, and



Dynamic EMG Among Persons With Chronic Musculoskeletal Low Back



Pain”, Clin J Pain, Vol. 20, No. 2, (April 2004)


92
WONG, ARNOLD Y. L., et al., “Does experimental low back pain change



posteroanterior lumbar spinal stiffness and trunk muscle activity? A



randomized crossover study”, Clinical Biomechanics 34, (2016), 45-52


93
WILLER, JEAN CLAUDE, “Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and



Nociceptive Flexion Reflex in Man”, Pain, 3, (1977), 69-80


94
CHAN, C. W. Y., et al., “Subjective pain sensation is linearly correlated with



the Flexion reflex in man”, Brain Research, 479, (1989), 145-150


95
RHUDY, JAMIE L., et al., “Defining the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR)



threshold in human participants: A comparison of different scoring criteria”,



Pain 128, (2007), 244-253


96
SKLJAREVSKI, V., et al., “The nociceptive flexion reflex in humans -



review article”, Pain, 96, (2002), 3-8


97
MYLIUS, VETT, et al., “Sex differences in nociceptive withdrawal reflex



and pain perception”, Somatosensory and Motor Research 22 (3), (September



2005), 207-211


98
GREEN, ALEXANDE L., “Measurement of muscle sympathetic nerve



activity reveals true sympathetic changes in chronic pain”, Exp Physiol



97.10, (2012), 1083


99
FAZALBHOY, AZHARUDDIN, et al., “Individual differences in the



cardiovascular responses to tonic muscle pain: parallel increases or decreases



in muscle sympathetic nerve activity, blood pressure and heart rate”, Exp



Physiol 97.10, (2012), 1084-1092


100
KOENIG, J., et al., “Heart rate variability and experimentally induced pain in



healthy adults: A systematic review”, European Journal of Pain 18, (2014),



301-314


101
ZAMUNER, A. R., et al., “Relationship between sympathetic activity and



pain intensity in fibromyalgia”, Clin Exp Rheumatol 33 - Abstract, [Online].



Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezp3.lib.umn.edu/pubmed/25786044, (February



2015), 1-2


102
BALIKI, MARWAN N., et al., “Beyond Feeling: Chronic Pain hurts the



Brain, Disrupting the Default-Mode Network Dynamics”, The Journal of



Neuroscience, 28 (6), (Feb. 6, 2008), 1398-1403


103
TAGLIAZUCCHI, ENZO, et al., “Brain resting state is disrupted in chronic



back pain patients”, Neurosci Lett. 485 (1) - NIH Public Access, (Nov. 12, 2010),



26-31


104
SMALLWOOD, RACHEL F., et al., “Structural Brain Anomalies and



Chronic Pain: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Gray Matter Volume”, The



Journal of Pain, Vol. 14, No. 7, (July 2013), 663-675


105
BARAD, MEREDITH J., et al., “Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Is



Associated With Structural Abnormalities in Pain-Related Regions of the



Human Brain”, The Journal of Pain, Vol. 15, No. 2, (February 2014), 197-203


106
SCHULMAN, JOSHUA J., et al., “Thalamocortical dysrhythmia syndrome:



MEG imaging of neuropathic pain”, (Jul. 25, 2014), 33-39


107
WALTON, K. D., et al., “Abnormal thalamocortical activity in patients with



Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1”, Pain 150, (2010), 41-51


108
SIDDALL, PHILLIP J., et al., “Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Detects



Biochemical Changes in the Brain Associated with Chronic Low Back Pain:



A Preliminary Report”, Anesth Analg 102, (2006), 1164-1168


109
UCEYLER, NUNCAN, et al., “Differential expression of cytokines in



painful and painless neuropathies”, (2007)


110
PLAZA-MANZANO, GUSTAVO, et al., “Changes in Biochemical Markers



of Pain Perception and Stress Response After Spinal Manipulation”, Journal



of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 44, No. 4, (April 2014),



231-239


111
PATTI, GARY J., et al., “Metabolomics implicates altered sphingolipids in



chronic pain of neuropathic origin”, nature chemical biology, Vol. 8, (March



2012), 232-234


112
McGregor et al. (2011). The biochemistry of chronic pain and fatigue


113
KESHARI, KAYVAN R., et al., “Lactic Acid and Proteoglycans as



Metabolic Markers dor Discogenic Back Pain”, SPINE, Vol. 13, No. 3,



(2008), 312-317


114
C. O. Stiller et al. (1996) Release of GABA in dorsal horn and suppression of



tactile allodynia by SCS in mononeurophathic rats.


115
TAUDA, MAKOTO, et al., “P2X4 receptors and neuropathic pain”,



Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Vol. 7, Article 191, (Oct. 28, 2013), 1-6


116
Symons, Frank J., Issam ElGhazi, Brian G. Reilly, Chantel C. Barney, Leah



Hanson, Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari, Ian M. Armitage, and George L. Wilcox.



“Can biomarkers differentiate pain and no pain subgroups of



nonverbal children with cerebral palsy? A preliminary investigation based on



noninvasive saliva sampling.” Pain Medicine16, no. 2 (2015): 249-256.


117
Generaal, Ellen, Nicole Vogelzangs, Gary J. Macfarlane, Rinie Geenen,



Johannes H. Smit, Brenda WJH Penninx, and Joost Dekker. “Reduced



hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in chronic multi-site



musculoskeletal pain: partly masked by depressive and anxiety disorders.”



BMC Musculoskeletal disorders 15, no. 1 (2014): 227.


118
McBeth, John, Yee H. Chiu, Alan J. Silman, David Ray, Richard Morriss,



Chris Dickens, Anindya Gupta, and Gary J. Macfarlane. “Hypothalamic-



pituitary-adrenal stress axis function and the relationship with chronic



widespread pain and its antecedents.” Arthritis research & therapy 7, no. 5



(2005): R992.


119
McCarthy, K. F., and C. McCrory. “Cerebrospinal fluid levels of glial cell-



derived neurotrophic factor correlate with spinal cord stimulation frequency



in patients with neuropathic pain: a preliminary report.” Spinal cord 52



(2014): S8-S10.


120
Marchi, Antonio, Renato Vellucci, Sergio Mameli, Anna Rita Piredda, and



Gabriele Finco. “Pain biomarkers.” Clinical drug investigation 29 (2009): 41.


121
Denk, Franziska, and Stephen B. McMahon. “Chronic pain: emerging



evidence for the involvement of epigenetics.” Neuron 73, no. 3 (2012): 435-444.


122
Latremoliere, Alban, Alexandra Latini, Nick Andrews, Shane J. Cronin,



Masahide Fujita, Katarzyna Gorska, Ruud Hovius et al. “Reduction of



neuropathic and inflammatory pain through inhibition of the



tetrahydrobiopterin pathway.” Neuron 86, no. 6 (2015): 1393-1406.


123
{hacek over (C)}ulić, Ognjen, Mario D. Cordero, Tihana {hacek over (Z)}anić-Grubi{hacek over (s)}ić, Anita Somborac-



Ba{hacek over (c)}ura, Lara Bati{hacek over (c)}ić Pu{hacek over (c)}ar, Dijana Detel, Jadranka Varljen, and Karmela



Bari{hacek over (s)}ić. “Serum activities of adenosine deaminase, dipeptidyl peptidase IV



and prolyl endopeptidase in patients with fibromyalgia: diagnostic



implications.” Clinical rheumatology 35, no. 10 (2016): 2565-2571.








Claims
  • 1. A system for managing pain of a patient, comprising: a pain monitoring circuit including: a parameter analyzer configured to receive and analyze at least two parameter of a physiological parameter indicative of a physiological function or state of the patient, a functional parameter indicative of a physical activity or state of the patient, and a patient parameter including subjective information provided by the patient; anda pain score generator configured to compute a composite pain score using an outcome of the analysis, the composite pain score indicating a degree of the pain;a pain relief device configured to deliver one or more pain-relief therapies; anda control circuit configured to control the delivery of the one or more pain-relief therapies using the composite pain score and therapy parameters.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the parameter analyzer is configured to generate one or more weighting factors, and is configured to produce a signal metric using the at least two parameters with the one or more weighting factors each applied to a parameter of the at least two parameters, and the pain score generator is configured to compute a composite pain score using the signal metric.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the parameter analyzer is configured to adjust the one or more weighting factors by automatic adaptation to the patient over time.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the pain monitoring circuit further comprises: one or more physiological signal sensors configured to sense one or more physiological signals from the patient;a physiological signal sensing circuit configured to process the one or more physiological signals;a physiological parameter generator configured to generate the physiological parameter using the processed one or more physiological signals;one or more functional signal sensors to sense one or more functional signals from the patient;a functional signal sensing circuit configured to process the one or more functional signals; anda functional parameter generator configured to generate the functional parameter using the processed one or more functional signals.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the one or more physiological signal sensors comprises a sensor configured to sense a physiological signal indicative of change in sympathetic activity, and the physiological parameter generator is configured to generate a physiological parameter being a measure of the change in sympathetic activity.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the one or more physiological signal sensors comprises a sensor configured to sense a physiological signal indicative of an neural activity, and the physiological parameter generator is configured to generate a physiological parameter being a measure of the neural activity.
  • 7. The system of claim 4, wherein the one or more functional signal sensors comprises a sensor configured to sense a function signal indicative of a measure of movement or posture, and the functional parameter generator is configured to generate a functional parameter quantitatively indicative of the measure of movement or posture.
  • 8. The system of claim 4, comprising an implantable medical device and an external device configured to be communicatively coupled to the implantable medical device, the implantable medical device including the pain monitoring circuit, the pain relief device, and the control circuit, and the control circuit comprises an implant control circuit, the external device including: a patient information input device configured to receive patient information related to pain, the patient information input device including a patent input device configured to receive a parameter representative of intensity of the pain specified by the patient.a patient information processing circuit configured to process the patient information; anda patient parameter generator configured to generate the patient parameter using the processed patient information.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the external device is configured to receive the composite pain score, to produce a notification using the composite pain score, to determine one or more recipients of the notification using the composite pain score, and to control delivery of the notification to each of the one or more recipients.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the external device is configured to produce external commands for adjusting the therapy parameters using the composite pain score and the patient information and transmit the external commands to the implantable medical device, and the implant control circuit is configured to adjust the therapy parameters using the external commands.
  • 11. A method for managing pain of a patient, comprising: receiving and analyzing at least two parameter selected from a physiological parameter indicative of a physiological function or state of the patient, a functional parameter indicative of a physical activity or state of the patient, and a patient parameter related to the pain automatically using a processor, the patient parameter including subjective information provided by the patient;computing a composite pain score using the processor based on an outcome of the analysis, the composite pain score indicating of a degree of the pain;delivering one or more pain-relief therapies using a pain relief therapy device;andcontrolling the delivery of the one or more pain-relief therapies from the pain relief therapy device automatically using the processor based on the composite pain score and therapy parameters.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising generating one or more weighting factors, and wherein analyzing the at least two parameters comprises generating a signal metric using the at least two parameters with the one or more weighting factors each applied to a parameter of the at least two parameters, and computing the composite pain score comprises computing the composite pain score using the signal metric.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising adjusting the one or more weighting factors by automatic adaptation to the patient over time.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, further comprising: sensing one or more physiological signals from the patient using one or more physiological signal sensors;generating the physiological parameter based the one or more physiological signals using the processor;sensing one or more functional signals from the patient using one or more functional signal sensors;generating the functional parameter based the one or more functional signals using the processor; andreceiving a parameter representative of intensity of the pain from the patient.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein generating the physiological parameter comprises generating a measure of the change in sympathetic activity.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein generating the physiological parameter comprises generating a measure of the neural activity.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein generating the functional parameter comprises generating a functional parameter quantitatively indicative of a measure of movement or posture.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, further comprising: producing a notification using the composite pain score;determining one or more recipients of the notification using the composite pain score and one or more specified thresholds; anddelivering the notification to each of the one or more recipients.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, wherein delivering the one or more pain-relief therapies using the pain relief therapy device comprises delivering one or more of a neuromodulation therapy including electrical stimulation or a drug therapy from an implantable medical device.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising adjusting the therapy parameters using the composite pain score and a patient command entered by the patient using an external device communicatively coupled to the implantable medical device.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/400,336, filed on Sep. 27, 2016, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is related to commonly assigned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/400,313, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLOSED-LOOP PAIN MANAGEMENT”, filed on Sep. 27, 2016 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/395,641, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT USING HEART SOUNDS”, filed on Sep. 16, 2016, which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62400336 Sep 2016 US