The present application generally relates to perforating activities, and more specifically to reduction of debris in a wellbore.
Productivity or injectivity of a well relates to the wellbore radius. The larger the wellbore radius, the better the productivity or infectivity. However, drilling a larger borehole could be prohibitive because of substantial increase of drilling and completion cost for a larger borehole. For a weak or unconsolidated formation, it would be beneficial to enlarge the wellbore by producing sand to some extent before fracture packing and other gravel packing operations. Perforating in such weak or unconsolidated sand formations often induces collapse of the perforation tunnels and even the near wellbore formation. Hence, the perforation naturally allows sand production from the formation for enhancement of the productivity or injectivity. However, conventional perforation in weak or unconsolidated sand also results in sand accumulation in the wellbore. The produced sand in the wellbore can clog the gun and complicate the completion operations. For example, sand control and other completion devices may not be able to be positioned at the right place before the sand in the wellbore is completely cleaned out. Therefore, although producing some sand from formation through perforations may increase the well productivity and infectivity, it is beneficial not to produce any sand into the wellbore after perforation.
Except for sand production from the perforation in weak or unconsolidated formation, debris in the perforation tunnels for consolidated formation is also detrimental for well productivity and injectivity. Dynamic underbalanced perforating techniques, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,081, U.S. Pat. No. 6,598,682, U.S. Pat. No. 7,121,340 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,182,138, can be very efficient to remove the crushed zone near the wall of the perforation tunnels and clean the debris in the perforation tunnels out of formation. However, for weak or unconsolidated sand formation, dynamic underbalance perforating can actually sometimes make the sanding worse. Without proper control, the produced sand could lead to the failure of the completion operations.
Hence, it is desirable to have a better perforating technique in weak or unconsolidated formation.
The following summary highlights features of preferred embodiments and is in no way meant to unduly limit the scope of any present or future related claims.
According to various features and embodiments of the present application, a perforating method includes lowering the perforating system into a well to the targeted formation interval, orienting the gun and all charges at a pre-selected direction or within a confined angle around the azimuth of the wellbore, using mechanical means to allow the perforation gun sufficiently contacting/closing the casing in the targeted direction, and detonating the charges and establishing communication between the inner volume of the gun carrier and the formation, and allowing formation fluids, loosening sand and other debris to flow into the gun carrier without discharging into the annulus between the gun carrier and casing. In one embodiment, the perforating system includes sealing rings that restricts the flow communication between wellbore space and the inner gun carrier. In another embodiment, flow restrictors are installed on the perimeter of the gun carrier and surround the shaped charges. In another embodiment, the perforating system includes a sliding sleeve that closes the perforated holes in the gun carrier after some times of the charges being detonated.
An embodiment includes a perforating system having a perforating gun with a tubular gun housing defining an inner volume and extending in an axial direction. A shaped charge is held in a loading tube. The loading tube is located in the gun housing. The loading tube extends along the axial direction. The shaped charge faces in a firing direction substantially perpendicular to the axial direction. A portion of the gun housing adjacent to the shaped charge in the firing direction is a perforating portion for removal upon firing of the shaped charge. An eccentralizer member extends from the perforating gun in a second direction that is substantially opposite and parallel with the firing direction. A first retainer part extends from an outer surface of the gun housing adjacent to the perforating portion. A second retainer part extends from the outside of the gun housing adjacent to the perforating portion. The inner volume of the gun housing is insulated from pressure outside of the gun housing until firing of the shaped charge perforates the perforating area.
This and other features and embodiments are discussed herein.
The following is a brief description of the figures herein which illustrate various features of embodiments.
The preceding brief description of figures is meant to help understand the features of embodiments discussed in the present application and is in no way meant to be used to limit any claims in this application or any subsequent related claims.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of features and embodiments of the present application. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that features and embodiments within the present application may be practiced without many of these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments are possible. These details are not meant in any way to be used to unduly limit claims in this application or any future related claims.
As used here, the terms “above” and “below”; “up” and “down”; “tipper” and “lower”; “upwardly” and “downwardly”; and other like terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or element are used in this description to more clearly describe some embodiments. However, when applied to equipment and methods for use in wells that are deviated or horizontal, such terms may refer to a left to right, right to left, or diagonal relationship as appropriate.
A first step of a perforating method according to embodiments in the present application includes running the perforating system 10 into the wellbore. Based on the CCL measurements, the perforating system 10 is set at the formation interval to be perforated.
A second step is to orient the perforating system 10 at the pre-defined azimuthal direction based on the measurements from the gyroscope 17. Once the pre-defined azimuthal direction is achieved, the eccentralizers 19 and 27 are set to push the charge shooting portion of the gun carrier 44 against the casing wall. The cross-section view of the perforating system 10 is shown in
A third step is to control the pressure differentials among the major regions before the charge detonation. Referring to
A fourth step is to detonate the charges in the perforating system 10. The perforated cement sheath 41, casing 42 and gun carrier shell 44 establish communications between the formation fluid 40 and the inner gun volume 46. Pgun is substantially lower than Ppore and Pwell after a very short period of time after the charge detonation (e.g., about several to tens of milliseconds). This results in the dynamic underbalance phenomenon which can lead to collapse of some perforation tunnels for weak or unconsolidated formation and the formation fluid 40 and wellbore fluid 43 filling in the inner gun volume 46. Because the shooting portion of the gun carrier 44 is set against the casing wall 42 at the perforated holes 48 and 49 as shown in
After sufficient time, the produced sand and debris settle down to the sand and debris holder 26. The eccentralizers 19 and 27 are unset and the perforating system 10 is retrieved from the wellbore. Enlarging wellbore radius behind casing by producing some formation sand without the sand accumulation in wellbore is achieved at the same time using the present embodiment.
The perforating system 10 can be reloaded and rerun numerous times as needed to perforate the well in the same or other azimuthal directions. In each of these runs, sand and debris accumulation in the wellbore will be reduced/minimized. Therefore, the goal of reduced, preferably no, debris perforating can be better realized while productivity of the well is enhanced by removing some sands near the perforating tunnels.
The eccentralizers 19 and 27 with bowed springs used in the perforating system 10 are only one example of various devices applicable in this application. Other devices may be installed in the perforating system 10 with similar functionality, e.g., springs, magnets, telescoping devices or arms. Also, more than one eccentralizer spaced radially can be used so long as they are evenly spaced from 180° of the firing direction of the shaped charge 47, e.g. one on each side.
To further restrict the flow communication between the wellbore space 43 and the inner gun volume 46, retainer parts can be applied to an outside surface of the gun carrier 44 in proximity to the perforating portion of the gun carrier 44. For example, sealing rings 102 can be used on scallops 100 on the gun carrier 44.
Another method to reduce the debris and sand production in the wellbore is to close the perforated holes on the gun carrier 44 after the gun volume 46 contains debris, e.g. is filled up.
In another embodiment, flow restrictors are used to reduce the flow communication between the inner gun volume 46 and the wellbore 43.
In addition to the flow restrictors 150 and 151 that reduce the lateral fluid flow from the wellbore 43 into the gap 155 between the two restrictors, the vertical fluid flow from the wellbore 43 above and below the gun carrier 44 into the gap region 155 should also be confined.
In another embodiment, multiple flow restrictors can be used to replace the single vertical flow restrictor 190. As shown in
The vertical flow restrictors 190 and 195 may be installed without the horizontal flow restrictors 150 and 151, and vice versa. There is also no restriction that the vertical flow restrictors are installed within the horizontal flow restrictors 150 and 151. The vertical flow restrictor 190 or 195 can be installed on the entire periphery of the gun carrier 44, or just a portion thereof.
In addition to the wireline, the perforating system 10 can also be conveyed to the targeted location in a well by other methods. For example, the perforating system 10 can be installed in drill pipes, tubing pipes, coiled tubing or other convey means to realize the same perforating results with low debris in the wellbore. All the embodiments herein are applicable regardless of the conveyance differences.
The preceding description is mean to illustrate various features described in the present application and is not meant to limit the present or future related claim scope in any way.
The present application claims priority and benefit to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/140,937 that was filed on Dec. 27, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3347314 | Schuster | Oct 1967 | A |
3630282 | Lanmon, II | Dec 1971 | A |
3707195 | Lanmon, II | Dec 1972 | A |
3727692 | Kinley et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
4105070 | Lavigne et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4105073 | Brieger | Aug 1978 | A |
4515217 | Stout | May 1985 | A |
4756371 | Brieger | Jul 1988 | A |
5379845 | Blount et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
6220370 | Wesson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6554081 | Brooks et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575247 | Tolman et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6598682 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6672405 | Tolman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6732798 | Johnson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6874579 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6966377 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7036594 | Walton et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7121340 | Grove et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7182138 | Behrmann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195066 | Sukup et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7243725 | George et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7287589 | Grove et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7428921 | Grove et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430965 | Walker | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450053 | Funk et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451819 | Chang et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7621342 | Walker | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7900699 | Ramos et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20050061506 | Grove et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050133220 | Bishop | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167108 | Chang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050236183 | Grove et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060075889 | Walker | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060283592 | Sierra et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070079960 | Grove et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080062036 | Funk et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090032258 | Chang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090084552 | Behrmann et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114382 | Grove et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2396175 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2403968 | Jan 2005 | GB |
2406114 | Mar 2005 | GB |
2406865 | Apr 2005 | GB |
2408057 | May 2005 | GB |
2413837 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2421966 | Jul 2006 | GB |
2426040 | Nov 2006 | GB |
0165060 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2009042479 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Walton, I.C., Atwood, D.C., Halleck, P.M. and Bianco, L.C.B.: “Perforating unconsolidated sands: an experimental and theoretical investigation,” SPEDC, p. 141-149, Sep. 2002. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100163238 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61140937 | Dec 2008 | US |