This disclosure relates to human surgical procedures performed percutaneously, and more specifically to a novel retractor, neuro-monitoring probe and progressive cannula system that enhances illumination and visibility. The disclosure also relates to a system and method for providing one or more disposable or reusable camera/video devices, including camera/video devices incorporating CCD and/or CMOS technology.
Surgical procedures to address illness, disease or injury vary depending on a number of factors, including the ability of the surgeon(s) to access and perform the necessary procedures at the affected site. As one example, individuals who suffer degenerative disc disease, natural spine deformations, a herniated disc, spine injuries or other spine disorders often require surgery on the affected region to relieve pain or prevent further injury to the spine and nerves. Spinal surgery may involve removal of damaged joint tissue, insertion of a tissue implant and/or fixation of two or more adjacent vertebral bodies. These procedures are often difficult due to the location of the spine and adjacent nerves, sensitive anatomy, etc. The surgical procedure will vary in approach and duration depending on the nature and extent of the injury.
One particular type of spinal surgery is referred to as “fusion.” Fusion of vertebral bodies involves fixation of two or more adjacent vertebrae. This procedure may be performed through introduction of rods or plates, and screws or other devices into a vertebral joint to join various portions of a vertebra to a corresponding portion on an adjacent vertebra. Fusion may occur in the lumbar, interbody or cervical spine region of a patient. A fusion is designed to stop and/or eliminate all motion in the spinal segment by destruction of some or all of the joints in that segment and further utilizing bone graft material and/or rigid implantable fixation devices for securing the adjacent vertebrae. By eliminating movement, back pain and further degenerative disc disease may be reduced or avoided. Fusion requires tools for accessing the vertebrae, such as surgical cannulae for “minimally-invasive” surgical procedures, and other tools for implanting the desired implant, bioactive material, etc. Such procedures often require introduction of additional tools to prepare a site for implantation. These tools may include drills, drill guides, debridement tools, irrigation devices, vises, clamps, cannula, and other insertion/retraction tools.
Spinal surgeries may be performed by a number of different “minimally-invasive” procedures, as opposed to conventional surgical procedures and methods, which typically require cutting of muscles, removal of bone, and retraction of other natural elements. With minimally invasive spinal surgery, a less destructive approach to the spine is carried out by using portals, which take advantage of anatomy and current technology to limit the damage to intervening structures.
Typically, skeletal landmarks are established fluoroscopically and a small incision is made over the landmark(s). According to methods known in the prior art, a series of dilators are applied until one or more cannula is placed over the anatomic structure. A microscope is then placed over the operative site. The microscope provides illumination and magnification with a three dimensional view of the anatomical site. While this process provides substantial advantages relative to open surgery, it requires the use of an operating microscope. This particular piece of equipment is extremely expensive (most quality brands are in the $250,000 range). The microscope is an unwieldy device requiring uncomfortable gyrations of the surgeon's back and neck in order to gain the necessary view and is a nuisance to drape (a large, sterile plastic bag has to be placed over the eight foot tall structure). The illumination is also difficult to direct due to the size of the microscope.
A significant danger of performing intervertebral operations or accessing an intervertebral space during spine surgery is that of inadvertently contacting or damaging the para-spinal nerves, including the exiting nerve roots, traversing nerves and the nerves of the cauda equina. The exact location of these para-spinal nerves cannot be determined prior to the commencement of surgery, and therefore are dependent on a surgeon's ability to visually locate the same after the initial incision is made. Moreover, intervertebral spaces in the spine have other sensitive nerves disposed at locations which are not entirely predictable prior to insertion of the surgical tool into the intervertebral area. Accordingly, the danger of pinching or damaging spinal nerves when accessing an intervertebral space has proven to be quite limiting to the methods and devices used during minimally invasive spinal surgery. In addition, as cannula are received through the patient's back, such as when performing minimally invasive spinal surgery, minor blood vessels are ruptured, thereby blocking the surgeon's vision inside the intervertebral region after the cannula has been inserted. Other anatomical features at a particular patient may also destruct the surgeon's view or make it difficult to provide illumination within the cannula.
Lateral based spinal surgery is a known alternative to conventional surgical procedures, and is generally referred to as a “minimally-invasive” procedure. Lateral based procedures offer the advantages of shorter recovery times, reduced blood loss, reduced post-operative complications, and shorter operating times than conventional procedures and methods. For example, one surgical approach for spinal fusion using a minimally invasive technique is known as “lumbar interbody fusion” or LIF for short. Other known examples of lateral based approaches include the Nuvasive XLIF procedure and Medtronic D-LIF System. However, these systems and methods have problems and shortcomings, including, but not limited to, limited visualization and lighting in the surgical area, increased risk of impinging upon the nerves of the lumbosacral plexus, and the ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerves and the risk of devices and/or instruments becoming dislodged during the various procedures, among others. These problems, alone or in combination, may result in post-operative pain and discomfort experienced by patients of lateral based spinal surgery. In some instances, these problems require or otherwise lead to additional surgeries, further complicating the likelihood of recovery and successful fusion.
Various devices and surgical access systems are known in the art to facilitate minimally invasive surgical procedures while allowing for a sufficiently large surgical area. These devices may include a series of tools which, when consecutively inserted, serve to gradually expand an area, including cannula. Retractors are useful for gradually dilating the area of an incision or surgical opening in order to form a desired amount of space within which various procedures may be conducted. Retractors may take the form of a single device that may be inserted into a work area and expanded at the direction of a user, thus allowing for the creation and maintaining of a surgical work space. Many retractors fail to provide independent illumination sources or allow the surgeon to visualize the path of access to the surgical site. As these retractors are often the first (or one of the first) tools used in the procedure, providing adequate illumination and enhancing visualization are important to the success of the operation. Thus, there is a present felt need for an improved retractor with enhanced illumination that otherwise improves the visibility for the surgeon, and for a method of retrofitting an existing retractor with apparatus to accomplish this objective.
Other problems experienced in minimally invasive surgical procedures include the risk of injury caused during the initial probing and dissecting of tissue between the incision and the surgical site. Typically, such probing is done using a finger or a slender dilator or other tool, which is used to navigate through the soft tissue, anatomy, and ultimately reach the desired point of access to the surgical site. During this probing, there is increased risk to injury to the lumbar plexus, particularly when the surgeon is attempting to access the lumbar spine. In addition, there is also an increased risk to the patient's anatomy, and to undesired dissection of various anatomical features between the incision and the surgical site. This risk of injury typically increases as the probe is inserted deeper into the body of a patient, and continues after the probe has been fully inserted and continuing through dilation, such as by inserting one or more progressive surgical cannula around the dilator proceeds. Damage to the peritoneal membrane, colon perforation, ureteral or great vessel injury can be the result of the “blind” dissection and is major reason why the lateral, transpoas approach is not a more commonly performed surgical procedure. Thus, there is a deep felt need in the art to mitigate these potentially catastrophic complications, and to address the other problems associated with performing these procedures in a “blind” manner.
Typically, as these processes for accessing the surgical site are done blind (i.e., without vision of where the probe is directed), it is not uncommon that the probing instrument(s) intersect and/or dissect the patient's anatomy, intercept nerves, sensitive tissue, rupture arteries, etc. Thus, there is also a need for an improved tool for initially dilating and accessing the tissue between the incision and the surgical site. There is a further need for an improved system and method for providing a surgeon with visibility of this area, to assist with the navigation through the tissue, anatomy, etc. and to provide enhanced illumination for a minimally invasive surgical procedure.
The disclosure of the invention herein addresses these and other problems by providing a system and method for achieving an endoscopic approach to a surgical site, coupled with the use of a unique illumination and video capability. The system of the invention is preferably achieved by incorporating a camera chip in the apparatus of the system, thereby obviating the need and disadvantages of the operating microscope and other expensive and cumbersome instrumentation. These and other considerations are addressed by the present disclosure in more detail in the Summary and Detailed Description.
Incorporated by reference in their entireties are the following U.S. patents and patent applications directed generally to methods and apparatus related to spinal procedures, thus providing written description support for various aspects of the present disclosure. The U.S. patents and pending applications incorporated by reference are as follows: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,406,775 to Funk, et al.; 7,387,643 to Michelson; 7,341,590 to Ferree; 7,288,093 to Michelson; 7,207,992 to Ritland; 7,077,864 Byrd III, et al.; 7,025,769 to Ferree; 6,719,795 to Cornwall, et al.; 6,364,880 to Michelson; 6,328,738 to Suddaby; 6,290,724 to Marino; 6,113,602 to Sand; 6,030,401 to Marino; 5,865,846 to Bryan, et al.; 5,569,246 to Ojima, et al.; 5,527,312 to Ray; and 2008/0255564 to Michelson. These references assist in explaining the current state of the art for surgical instruments generally, and provide additional written support for the various apparatus and methods described herein.
According to one particular embodiment of the present disclosure, the invention involves the use of a disposable cannula of variable lengths, which are applied over the dilator tools. These cannulas can have a variety of shapes depending upon the surgical requirement. Ovoid, egg-shaped or round cannulas are contemplated and may further comprise an angled working edge as described in greater detail herein. The devices described herein are unique in that they have incorporated a source of illumination, preferably attached to the walls of the cannula, which emit light to the base of the portal and enhance illumination within the cannula.
According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure, a modified retractor according to various embodiments is described that incorporates illumination and/or video capabilities. The modified retractor cooperates with cannula described in greater detail below to permit a surgeon to avoid nerves, aberrant vessels and other anatomical features such as the kidney, ureter, peritoneal membrane, etc. According to one embodiment, the retractor includes an extension or “periscope” feature that moves longitudinally along the shaft of the blade of the retractor to exclude retroperitoneal fat or other tissue that otherwise obscures the view of the surgeon along the outer surface of the blade of the retractor, where one or more cannula may be mounted.
According to one embodiment of the disclosure, the illumination is provided by way of fiber optic strands or bundles. The fiber optics can run circumferentially or along one or more walls of the cannula, and preferably terminate at least a centimeter from the bottom of the device. This prevents the illumination from “bottoming out” at the floor of the incision. Additionally, the light fibers may be fashioned in an annulus around a camera chip device to provide illumination to the surgical site where images are being captured by the camera chip device. In still another embodiment, the light fibers may be replaced by one or more LEDs in a remote light source or at the distal-tip of the camera chip device. The light source may come from an external device such as a headlight lamp, or a standard-type light source commonly found in operating rooms which plugs into an adaptor on the disposable cannula.
According to embodiments described herein, the system comprises a disposable cannula that has at least one slot through which the camera chip device(s) can be passed and inserted on a composite insert, which preferably fits in a tongue and groove fashion down the slot of the cannula. The camera chip device may have associated wide-angle optics and its composite insert can be easily removed/adjusted during the course of the operation for cleaning or when the cannula needs to be re-directed or reoriented during the course of the surgery.
The camera chip device, which according to a preferred embodiment is based on either CCD or CMOS technology, may have the necessary video-processing circuitry onboard the camera chip device housing, or the video-processing circuitry may be housed separately, several meters away from the camera chip device, and connected by a cable or alternatively via wireless transmission. For further details on the type of camera chip device according to a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, applicant hereby incorporates by reference in its entirety the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,310,642.
According to one embodiment, an apparatus and method and provided whereby, instead of the surgeon viewing the operative site through the oculars of the microscope, the anatomy is presented on a screen in front of him (or her) and in front of the assistant(s). Due to the camera chip device and associated optics housing being placed directly at the operative site, the image collected is free from the distortions and the “field-flattening” effects found when using complex optical stacks commonly found in operating microscopes and endoscopes. This results in a significant increase in “depth-cues” and color-reproduction and in turn improves visibility. The camera technology provides a three dimensional-type picture to the surgeon with enhanced illumination, and without the extra costs of adding a second camera device and expensive intra-ocular optical orientations. The costs of the microscope and its maintenance, plastic draping, sterility/contamination issues and surgeon fatigue are either eliminated or at least substantially reduced.
According to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, a tool is provided that comprises at least one CMOS or CCD video imaging device, which permits a user to view images captured by the CMOS or CCD imaging device of the disc space or other surgical area to be operated on. For example, one or more angled tools may incorporate a video insert (described in greater detail below), for capturing and viewing images of the intervertebral disc space during or after dissection has occurred. This may be accomplished by providing a CMOS or CCD camera device at the distal end of the one or more angled tools, and either wirelessly or hardwire transmitting the images captured by that CMOS or CCD camera to a display. As one other example, one or more scraping or debridement tools may incorporate the video insert described in greater detail below, for capturing and viewing images of the intervertebral disc space after and during dissection. This capacity allows for a more complete and safe disc space preparation. A more precise carpentry of the disc space allows for an increased potential for fusion and a reduction of vertebral endplate or soft tissue injury. This may be accomplished by providing a CMOS or CCD camera at the distal end of the one or debridement tools, and either wirelessly or hardwire transmitting the images captured by that CMOS or CCD camera to a display.
One having skill in the art will appreciate that the apparatus described herein, according to various embodiments of the present disclosure, may have various sizes. The sizes of the various elements of embodiments of the present disclosure may be sized based on factors including, for example, the anatomy of the patient, the person operating the apparatus, the surgical site location, physical features of any implanted device required with the surgical procedure, including, for example, width, length and thickness, and the size of the drill or other surgical tool being used with the apparatus, and other factors.
According to one embodiment, the illumination and camera/video capabilities described herein may be provided with one or more cannula having a shape other than round (e.g., oval, pointed, square cornered, egg-shaped etc.) and having an end (e.g., the end inserted into the patient, distal from the user) that is angled and/or tapered and/or shaped to be ideally seated in a particular surgical site. Asymmetrical cannulas may allow visualization of the facet joint of the spine, for example. An “egg-shaped” cross section may allow for the best view of the facet joint and further minimizes the medial-lateral dissection that a round cannula would require. Such shapes are specifically contemplated for incorporating the illumination and camera/video apparatus described herein.
Still other aspects of the invention are directed to cannula instruments that have a patient contacting end that is adjustable to assume a predetermined conformation. Thus, in one embodiment, material forms the end that comes into contact with bone, tissue, and especially as it nears nerve tissue, with such cannula end material being malleable to an extent necessary for the surgeon to mold the end such that it achieves the desired contours or avoids particular structures encountered in any particular surgery. By way of example but not limitation, if a bony outcropping, a nerve fiber, etc. is perceived by the surgeon, the cannula tip end can be adjusted to avoid undesired contact or interference with such tissues or structures.
In particular embodiments, the ability to adjust the geometric parameters of the cannula end may be achieved by manipulation of the other end of the instrument. For example, providing a turnable component at the opposite end of the instrument, the shape of the other end of the instrument (i.e. the end inserted into the patient) can be adjusted to either expand circumference, reduce circumference, render the opening more or less oblong, etc. In such a manner, it is possible to avoid having to remove the instrument or cannula from the patient's site to adjust the morphology of the instrument, thus saving time, avoiding undesired reinsertion procedures, etc.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a system is provided wherein the cannula further include one or more electrical probes at the exit portal, which are adapted to assist the surgeon in identifying the presence and location of nerves as the probe is advanced during minimally-invasive surgery, thereby providing further assistance and feedback for guiding the path of the cannula and other surgical instruments to be inserted into the surgical site.
An expandable tip cannula or dilator may be provided, which functions both as an access portal for surgery and as a system for nerve surveillance, such that the presence and relative position of para-spinal nerves, for example, can be detected as the expandable tip cannula is inserted through the patient's facia and musculature. One particular advantage of determining the position of the lumbosacral plexus with respect to the distal tip of the cannula/dilator is that the lumbosacral plexus can be avoided or gently moved out of the surgeon's way while inserting the cannula/dilator.
According to one embodiment, the present disclosure provides a system of cannulas adapted to assist the surgeon in guiding the path of surgical instruments received into the intervertebral space, while identifying the presence and location of para-spinal nerves as the cannula is advanced to a patient's intervertebral space during minimally invasive surgery. In various aspects of the present disclosure, probes of the type described in greater detail herein may be comprised of one or more electrodes powered at a low level to sense the position of a para-spinal nerve through continuous real time electromyographic monitoring. Alternatively, these electrodes can be powered at a higher level such that they operate to cauterize blood vessels. Safety systems ensure that power levels sufficient to cause cauterization are not activated if a nerve is sensed to be near the electrodes at the distal end of the cannula.
According to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, a system is provided where the cannula or dilator further include one or more electrical probes at the exit portal/patient contacting end, which are adapted to assist the surgeon in identifying the presence and location of nerves as the probe is advanced during minimally-invasive surgery, thereby providing a device for guiding the path of other surgical instruments to be inserted into the intervertebral space.
According to one embodiment, the present disclosure provides a system of cannulas adapted to assist the surgeon in guiding the path of surgical instruments received into an intervertebral space, while identifying the presence and location of para-spinal nerves as the cannula is advanced to a patient's intervertebral space during minimally invasive surgery. In various aspects of the present disclosure, the system of cannulas may further comprise of one or more electrodes powered at a low level to sense the position of the nerves of the lumbo-sacral plexus through continuous real time electromyographic monitoring. Alternatively, these electrodes can be powered at a higher level such that they operate to cauterize blood vessels. Safety systems ensure that power levels sufficient to cause cauterization are not activated if a nerve is sensed to be near the electrodes at the distal end of the cannula.
One having skill in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the present disclosure may be constructed of materials known to provide, or predictably manufactured to provide the various aspects of the present disclosure. These materials may include, for example, stainless steel, titanium alloy, aluminum alloy, chromium alloy, and other metals or metal alloys. These materials may also include, for example, PEEK, carbon fiber, ABS plastic, polyurethane, rubber, latex, synthetic rubber, and other fiber-encased resinous materials, synthetic materials, polymers, and natural materials.
One having skill in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the present disclosure may be controlled by means other than manual manipulation. Embodiments of the present disclosure may be designed and shaped such that the apparatus may be controlled, for example, remotely by an operator, remotely by an operator through a computer controller, by an operator using proportioning devices, programmatically by a computer controller, by servo-controlled mechanisms, by hydraulically-driven mechanisms, by pneumatically-driven mechanisms or by piezoelectric actuators.
The Summary of the Invention is neither intended nor should it be construed as being representative of the full extent and scope of the present disclosure. The present disclosure is set forth in various levels of detail in the Summary of the Invention as well as in the attached drawings and the Detailed Description of the Invention and no limitation as to the scope of the present disclosure is intended by either the inclusion or non-inclusion of elements, components, etc. in this Summary of the Invention. Additional aspects of the present disclosure will become more readily apparent from the Detailed Description, particularly when taken together with the drawings.
The above-described benefits, embodiments, and/or characterizations are not necessarily complete or exhaustive, and in particular, as to the patentable subject matter disclosed herein. Other benefits, embodiments, and/or characterizations of the present disclosure are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, as set forth above and/or described in the accompanying figures and/or in the description herein below. Further details and description of embodiments of the present disclosure are provided in the Appendix A to this application.
The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for accessing intervertebral space and facilitating the use of surgical tools and inserting spine implants between vertebral bodies. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the following description is merely illustrative of the principles of the disclosure, which may be applied in various ways to provide many different alternative embodiments. This description is made for illustrating the general principles of the teachings of this disclosure invention and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts disclosed herein.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and together with the general description of the disclosure given above and the detailed description of the drawings given below, serve to explain the principles of the disclosures.
It should be understood that the above-referenced drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. In certain instances, details that are not necessary for an understanding of the disclosure or that render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted. It should be understood, of course, that the disclosure is not necessarily limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
Various embodiments of the apparatus and methods of the present disclosure are described in detail below. The following patents are hereby incorporated by reference for the express purpose of describing the technology related to the use of illumination and video capabilities described herein, including the use of camera chips and CCD or CMOS technology: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,310,642; 6,275,255; 6,043,839; 5,929,901; 6,211,904; 5,986,693; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,030,904.
Referring now to
In this manner, a surgeon using the modified refractor may first insert the retractor, retract any tissue and other anatomical features between the incision and the surgical site, and then attach the cannula 25 by sliding the cannula 25 along the two thin edges in a longitudinal direction relative to the blade 15 of the retractor. In another embodiment, the two thin edges may have slightly raised surfaces or bosses for facilitating this attachment via a tongue and groove connection. In one embodiment, the handle 13 of the modified retractor extends in generally the same direction as the blade 15 of the modified retractor, or is offset from the plane of the blade by an angle less than 90 degrees to facilitate this interconnectivity between the modified retractor and the cannula described above.
According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, a method is disclosed whereby the dissecting finger is followed by this modified “Sherrill” retractor, which preferably incorporates one or more light emitting diodes 19 at its distal end as shown in
According to one embodiment, a flexible sleeve may be fabricated to fit over the body of an existing retractor or distractor device and incorporate the lumens or channels for inserting one or more fiber optic strands or bundles, and may also include a slot for inserting a camera insert such as the type described above. Therefore, existing retractors and distracters manufactured by various parties such as Medtronic and Nuvasive may incorporate the concepts of the present disclosure despite having no prefabricated lumens or slots for accommodating the necessary illumination and/or video capabilities discussed herein.
In use, this enhanced dilator 29 allows the surgeon to have direct visualization and illumination of the retroperitoneal space, and allows simultaneous stimulation of the psoas or other spinal nerves, via one or more electrical probes which are incorporated into one of the plurality of lumens of the dilator 29. This dilator 29 therefore serves as a guide, which allows the surgeon to safely and securely reach the surgical site without causing damage to any of the patient's anatomy, and continue with application of progressively larger dilators and working cannula (including those described herein) without causing injury to the patient.
The dilator 29 may vary in length, according to the patient and the unique anatomy presented for the surgical operation. According to a preferred embodiment, the length dilator 29 is in the range of 50-500 millimeters in length, and the diameter is approximately 2-10 480 millimeters. The material of the dilator 29 is preferably selected from the group consisting of aluminum, iron, titanium, steel, stainless steel, surgical stainless steel of the general alloy type of iron, carbon, chromium (12-20%) molybdenum (0.2-3%) and nickel (8-12%), martensitic steel, grade 316L austenitic steel, grade 316LVM austenitic steel, grade 316 stainless steel, medical grade plastic and PEEK.
According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, the same distal end of the dilator 29 that comprises a CCD or CMOS video device 31 further comprises a conductive material, which is capable of transmitting signals, such as neurological signals to a measuring device for detecting one or more nerves in-between the incision and the surgical site. This distal neuro-monitoring tip may be made of a variety of different conductive materials, including but not limited to copper, brass, aluminum, metal alloy, inherently conductive polymers or any of the known polymers having a conductive filler, such as metal fillers, metal-cooled glass and/or carbon fiber fillers.
One or more CCD or CMOS camera devices 31 located at the distal end of the dilator 29 may be surrounded by a lens, and the lens made of a conductive glass, wherein the conductivity of the device and the lens of the device are accomplished in a single integrated apparatus. According to a preferred embodiment, the distal end of the dilator 29 is generally ovoid in shape and provides for a compound radii, which further assists in moving soft and often sensitive tissue away from the tip of the dilator as it is inserted into the patient. Similarly, the conductive material at the distal tip of the dilator 29 is preferably ovoid, and permits material to be moved gently away from the device at is progressed deeper into the incision.
According to various embodiments, the dilator 29 further comprises one or more fiber optic fibers which extend longitudinally down the shaft of the dilator for providing illumination. According to one embodiment, the one or more strands are positioned proximate to the CCD or CMOS video device 31, such that the CCD or CMOS video device 31 has adequate illumination for capturing images at the distal end of the dilator 29. This illumination also allows a surgeon to achieve adequate visualization, both with the naked eye and through images captured by the CCD or CMOS video device 31. In an alternate embodiment, the illumination is proved by one or more LED devices adjacent the CCD or CMOS video device 31.
Referring again to the drawing figures, according to one embodiment, the dilator 29 may be comprised of a generally cylindrical body, having a generally ovoid cross-section as shown in
According to the embodiment shown in the drawing
In use, a method of retro peritoneal dissection involves using one or more slender video dilators to gently probe through the incision and to view the images captured by the CCD or CMOS video device located on or near the distal end of the one or more slender dilators. As the surgeon encounters sensitive anatomical features, such as the patient's intestine, images of those anatomical features will become apparent to the surgeon via the display. The images of other anatomical features are also captured by the CCD or CMOS video device during dissection and insertion of the one or more slender dilators.
If certain anatomical features cannot be moved from the path of the dilator, the approach of the surgeon may be adjusted accordingly, and the dilator inserted around these features to avoid undesired dissection. This in turn allows the surgeon to view the path to the disc space, achieve the desired approach and insure that any further instrumentation or apparatus that are inserted through the incision do not encounter the sensitive anatomical features of the patient, and further insure that the cannula are properly seated adjacent the disc space.
Once the slender dilator has been inserted through the sensitive anatomy of the patient and approaches the desired surgical cite, the surgeon can further use the images captured from the CCD or CMOS video device to find the desired location of the disc space where the operation will proceed, dissection of the disc space will occur, etc. According to one embodiment, this method involves incorporating one or more cannula, which may be inserted over the video dilator, and seated on the disc space using the same path achieved by insertion of the video dilator. Additional cannula may then be placed over this initial cannula, until the desired access has been achieved. Once the cannula are in position over the slender dilator, the surgeon may remove the dilator and use direct vision through the cannula, or use the slender dilator to continue to view the disc space, or both.
According to varying embodiments, this dilator and cannula system allows simultaneous illumination and video imaging of the path through which the surgeon must navigate to reach the surgical site. This in turn reduces the risk of unwanted dissection, unwanted exposure and damage to surrounding nerves, soft or sensitive tissue, etc. In use, the dilator may be further manipulated in conjunction with the Sherrill retractor (see FIG. 1), wherein this Sherrill retractor provides a narrow yet deep retracting blade, which may or may not incorporate a illuminated end, such as by an LED, which allows the surgeon to initially probe using the blade and remove the initial tissue immediately below the incision. The Sherrill retractor blade therefore provides an initial depth of illumination and navigation, and clears a passage for further insertion of the dilator. Multiple views of the Sherrill retractor used in combination with the dilator are shown in the appended drawing
This approach and apparatus is further advantageous in that it alleviates a common problem experienced by surgeons performing minimally invasive surgical procedures, which is fatigue. Using this dilator apparatus and method the surgeon is not required to position himself or herself over the cannula, or over a cumbersome or bulky microscope, which are frequently required in other surgical methods. By avoiding the positioning of the surgeon over the patient's body, the cannula, the microscope, etc., the surgeon is able to avoid significant discomfort and fatigue, which occurs naturally over time, particularly due to the surgery exceeding two hours to complete, or in some cases, 8 to 10 hours to complete. Using this method, the surgeon further avoids the necessary precautions required for exposure to radiographic imaging using this method. For example, the surgeon, by eliminating the use of x-rays and other radiographic equipment, is not required to wear a lead vest, a neck shield, a leaded glass face shield, etc. This further reduces the weight that the surgeon must bear during the operation, further reducing the stress and fatigue on the surgeon during the procedure.
Although not shown in the enclosed drawing figures, the slender dilator may further comprise one more mechanisms for cleaning or clearing the lens of the CMOS video camera at the distal end of the dilator. According to one embodiment, the clearing of the lens may occur mechanically, such as by a wiping mechanism, applied to a dilator such as the one shown in
According to one particular embodiment of the present disclosure, the invention involves the use of one or more cannula of variable lengths, which according to a preferred embodiment are applied over one or more dilators. These cannulas can have a variety of shapes depending upon the surgical requirement. Ovoid, egg-shaped or round have been described, and an angled working edge is further contemplated. The apparatus of this system are unique in that they have incorporated a source of illumination built into the walls of the cannula, which carry the light to the base of the portal of the cannula, and further incorporate camera/video capabilities.
Attention is drawn to
A cross-sectional shape of the support wall of the bore may be round, oval, elliptical, crescent-shaped, a half-sphere or half-oval or another suitable shape. The cross-sectional shape has a width, which may have a measurement in the range of about 10-50 millimeters. Preferably the width is in the range of about 15-35 millimeters. The open proximal end may further comprise a plurality of grip features which allow the surgeon to grip the cannula. The cannula may be formed of substantially sterile material, and may further comprise biocompatible polymers, elastomers, ceramics, or aluminum or other metals. According to one embodiment, the cannula is disposable. In another embodiment, the cannula is reusable.
One aspect of the present disclosure is providing a cannula with an incorporated illumination source that provides enhanced illumination to the surgical site sufficient to incorporate camera/video capabilities with the apparatus and system. According to one particular embodiment, the illumination is provided by incorporating one or more fiber optic strands in the tubular body of the cannula. The fiber optics can run circumferentially or along opposite walls of the cannula and preferably terminate at least a centimeter from the bottom of the device. The light fibers may be fashioned in an annulus around a camera device (See
Referring now in detail to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now in detail to
Referring now to
Referring now in detail to
According to an alternative embodiment, one or more light fibers/bundles may be fashioned in an annulus around the camera insert 40 to provide illumination to the surgical site. In still another embodiment, the light fibers may be replaced by LEDs in a remote light source or at the distal-tip of the cannula 12 or the camera insert 40. The light source may come from an external device such as a headlight lamp, or a standard-type light source commonly found in operating rooms which plugs into an adaptor on the cannula 12.
According to a preferred embodiment, the cannula described herein comprise at least one slot through which one or more camera device(s) can be inserted on a complimentary thin plastic composite stem-shaped insert, which preferably fits in a tongue and groove fashion along the tubular body of the cannula. The camera device(s) with associated wide-angle optics and its composite holder can be removed during the course of the operation for cleaning or when the cannula needs to be re-directed during the course of the surgery. The camera device, which according to a preferred embodiment is based on either CCD or CMOS technology, may have the necessary video-processing circuitry onboard the camera chip housing or the video-processing circuitry may be housed several meters away from the camera chip and connected by a cable or via wireless transmission.
Referring again the drawing figures,
According to a preferred embodiment, the CMOS or CCD camera insert is inserted into a slot or groove or channel which is formed about one interior wall of the planar surface of cannula as shown in
According to the embodiment shown in
Referring again to
As shown in
The connector shown in
Referring now to
Additional views of the CMOS or CCD camera insert and the cannula according to a preferred embodiment are shown in
Referring now to
Additional dilators/cannula may be inserted beside or over the first dilator in a progressive fashion until a sufficient pathway through the patient's tissue and anatomy has been formed for inserting one or more of the progressive cannula described above over these progressive dilators. By way of example but not limitation, a second dilator ranging in diameter from 7.5 millimeters to 12.5 millimeters may be placed over and around the first dilator, then a third dilator ranging in diameter from 10 millimeters to 15 millimeters may be placed over the second dilator, and a fourth dilator ranging in diameter from 12.5 millimeters may be placed over the third dilator. This step may be repeated several times by the surgeon, as necessary, until an adequate sized pathway is formed for inserting the cannula over the dilator assembly without causing trauma to the incision, the patient's anatomy, the surgical site, etc. It is expressly understood, although not depicted in
Various figures (shown or incorporated by reference herein), e.g.
Once the dilators 66 have been used to dilate the muscle tissue surrounding the path to the desired vertebrae, a cannula 60 may be inserted into the interior circumference of the dilators 66. The cannula 60 according to a preferred embodiment is ovoid in shape to permit dissection from caudad to cephalad (as opposed to from medial to lateral) and further accommodate dissection about the facet joint. As with the dilators 66, the cannula 60 may be variable in length, ranging preferably from 3-10 cm, to accommodate varying depths from skin to bone. As mentioned above, the cross-sectional geometry of the cannula is preferably ovoid in shape, and in a preferred embodiment the major diametrical axis of the cannula is about 20 mm, and the minor diametrical axis of the cannula is about 16 mm.
Varying embodiments of the cannula described herein may further comprise an angled or sloped surface at one distal end of the cannula for accommodating access and viewing of an implant site that is not directly below the incision. By way of example but not limitation, a surgeon may use one or more of the angled cannula shown in
According to one particular embodiment of the present disclosure, a system is provided where the cannula/dilator tools further include one or more electrical probes 51 at the exit portal, which are adapted to assist the surgeon in identifying the presence and location of nerves as the probe is advanced during minimally-invasive surgery, thereby providing a device for guiding the path of other surgical instruments to be inserted into the intervertebral space. For example, an expandable tip cannula 50 may be provided, which functions both as an access portal for spinal surgery and as a system for nerve surveillance, such that the presence and relative position of the nerves of the lumbo-sacral plexus can be detected as the expandable tip cannula 50 is inserted through the patient's fascia and musculature. One particular advantage of determining the position of the nerves with respect to the distal tip of the cannula is that the nerves can be avoided or gently moved out of the surgeon's way while inserting the cannula. This concept may also be incorporated in the one or more slender dilator tools described in detail herein.
According to another embodiment, the present disclosure provides a system of cannulas/dilators adapted to assist the surgeon in guiding the path of surgical instruments received into the intervertebral space, while identifying the presence and location of para-spinal nerves as the cannula/dilator is advanced to a patient's intervertebral space during minimally invasive surgery. In various aspects of the present disclosure, the probes may be comprised of one or more electrodes powered at a low level to sense the position of the nerves of the lumbo-sacral plexus through continuous real time electromyographic monitoring. Alternatively, these electrodes can be powered at a higher level such that they operate to cauterize blood vessels. Safety systems ensure that power levels sufficient to cause cauterization are not activated if a nerve is sensed to be near the electrodes at the distal end of the cannula/dilator.
The system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure includes providing illumination and video capability with a cannula having a shape other than round (e.g., oval, pointed, square cornered, etc.) and having an end (e.g., the end inserted into the patient, distal from the user) that is angled and/or shaped to be ideally seated in a surgical site. Asymmetrical cannulas may allow visualization of the facet joint, and an “egg-shaped” cross section may allow for the best view of the facet joint and minimizes the medial-lateral dissection that a round cannula would require.
Still other aspects of the invention are directed to cannula instruments that have a patient contacting end that is adjustable to assume a predetermined conformation. Thus, in one embodiment, material forms the tip end that comes into contact with bone, tissue, and especially as it nears nerve tissue, with such cannula end material being malleable to an extent necessary for the surgeon to mold the end conformation such that it achieves desired avoidance of particular structures encountered in any particular surgery. Thus, if a bony outcropping, a nerve fiber, etc. is perceived by the surgeon, the cannula tip end can be adjusted to avoid undesired contact or interference with such tissues or structures. In particular embodiments, the ability to adjust the geometric parameters of the tip end is achieved by manipulation of the other end of the instrument. For example, providing a turnable component at the opposite end of the instrument, the shape of the other end of the instrument (i.e. the end inserted into the patient) can be adjusted to expand circumference, reduce circumference, render the opening more or less oblong, etc. In such a manner, it is possible to avoid having to remove the instrument or cannula from the patient's site to adjust the morphology of the instrument or cannula operating end, thus saving time, avoiding undesired reinsertion procedures, etc.
Certain embodiments of the surgical cannula, which may be used in conjunction with certain aspects of the present disclosure, include cannula having a bottom opening that is angled oblique to the top opening. These cannuale may be in correspondingly larger or smaller form factors so that they may become nested within one another for facilitating insertion in the patient. The cannula may have an elliptical cross-section. In one embodiment, the ellipse has a width of about 20 millimeters in its major axis, and a width of about 16 millimeters in its minor axis. It will be appreciated that the cannula cross-section may be of a different size and have a different shape including, for example, an oval, a rectangle, a square, a rhombus, a trapezoid, a parallelogram, a polygon and a generally oblong shape such as an egg or football shape. As will be appreciated by one having skill in the art, the cross-sectional shape of the cannula permits the user to employ instruments in the cannula that require movement or manipulation in one direction, preferably along the major axis, but to a lesser extent in the other direction. The oblong shape of the cannula would permit, for example, rasps and curettes to be manipulated and used in a joint in a minimally invasive fashion. Similarly, other tools can be manipulated and used in a joint at any angle relative to the shaft of the tool. One having skill in the art will appreciate that the specific dimensional requirements of the cannula will vary based on the length of the cannula, and the items or tools being inserted therein.
As will be appreciated, the cannula provides access to adjacent facets of two adjacent vertebrae. The oval or elliptical shape of the cannula, however, allows the procedure to be performed in a minimally invasive fashion by reducing the incision required to gain access to the surgical site and the reducing the tissue exposed during the procedure. Another advantage provided by certain embodiments of the cannula of the present disclosure is that it provides optimal access to a surgical site that may have anatomy or bone features that make it desirable to have, for example, an angled and/or curved end to the cannula. One having skill in the art will further appreciate that an ideally shaped cannula will allow the user to more safely and reliably access the surgical site and will reduce the risk of injury to the surrounding tissue.
Various dilators may be used (in connection with the cannula of the system described above) having various sizes, various lengths and cross-sectional areas. The dilators, like the cannula described above, may have an oval or elliptical shape. According to a preferred embodiment, one or more dilators may be used to dilate the muscle or other tissue of the patient to access the surgical site. According to a preferred embodiment, a first slender dilator is used to probe through the muscle or other tissue and to locate the desired vertebrae. Once that first slender dilator is seated, additional dilators may be inserted around the previously seated dilator until the desired circumference through the muscle or other tissue is achieved. In this fashion, the first slender dilator serves as a radiographic marker, and establishes the path for subsequent dilators of greater circumference than the first slender dilator. This serves to reduce ischemic injury to the patient and reduces the time necessary to locate and access the desired vertebrae. The first slender dilator has a sufficient circumference to be easily viewed by x-ray or other imaging technology when seating the dilator on the desired vertebrae. The dilators are variable in length, preferably ranging from 3-14 cm.
Once the dilators have been used to dilate the muscle tissue surrounding the path to the desired vertebrae, a cannula may be inserted into the interior circumference of the dilators. The cannula according to a preferred embodiment is ovoid in shape to permit dissection from caudad to cephalad (as opposed to from medial to lateral) and further accommodate dissection about the facet joint. As with the dilators, the cannula may be variable in length, ranging preferably from 3-10 cm, to accommodate varying depths from skin to bone. As mentioned above, the cross-sectional geometry of the cannula is preferably ovoid in shape, and in a preferred embodiment the major diametrical axis of the cannula is about 20 mm, and the minor diametrical axis of the cannula is about 16 mm.
Varying embodiments of the cannula described herein may further comprise an angled or sloped surface at one distal end of the cannula for accommodating access and viewing of an implant site that is not directly below the incision. By way of example but not limitation, a surgeon may use one or more of the cannula described herein in conjunction with the dilators described herein to probe through the muscle or other tissue using an angled approach, thereby allowing access to a specific vertebrae either above or below the vertebrae directly below the incision. Once the dilators have been used to clear a path through the muscle or other tissue at an angled approach, the angled cannula may be inserted with the angled or sloped surface oriented so that the angled or sloped surface rests near horizontally against the vertebrae. These cannula assist the access and visibility of additional vertebrae without requiring additional incisions, and further permits securing fastening devices such as screws using an angled approach.
As with the other cannula described above, the cross-sectional shape of the angled cannula is preferably ovoid in shape, and the entire longitudinal length of the angled cannula may be slightly greater than the other cannula described herein. According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a system is provided where the cannula further include one or more electrical probes at the exit portal, which are adapted to assist the surgeon in identifying the presence and location of nerves as the probe is advanced during minimally-invasive surgery, thereby providing a device for guiding the path of other surgical instruments to be inserted into the intervertebral space.
An expandable tip cannula may be provided, which functions both as an access portal for spinal surgery and as a system for nerve surveillance, such that the presence and relative position of para-spinal nerves can be detected as the expandable tip cannula is inserted through the patient's facia and musculature. An advantage of determining the position of the para-spinal nerve with respect to the distal tip of the cannula in particular is that the para-spinal nerve can be avoided or gently moved out of the surgeon's way while inserting the cannula.
Accordingly, the present disclosure provides a system of cannulas adapted to assist the surgeon in guiding the path of surgical instruments received into the intervertebral space, while identifying the presence and location of para-spinal nerves as the cannula is advanced to a patient's intervertebral space during minimally invasive surgery. In various aspects of the present disclosure, the probes may be comprised of one or more electrodes powered at a low level to sense the position of a para-spinal nerve through continuous real time electromyographic monitoring. Alternatively, these electrodes can be powered at a higher level such that they operate to cauterize blood vessels. Safety systems ensure that power levels sufficient to cause cauterization are not activated if a nerve is sensed to be near the electrodes at the distal end of the cannula.
The present disclosure is also directed to an angled tool for use in performing spinal surgery procedures that includes illumination and/or video capabilities. According to a preferred embodiment, the angled tool is comprised of a longitudinal shaft, and has a first or operating end and a second or working end. The shaft is preferably tubular and has a bore running through the length of the angular tool suitable for receiving an insert. The insert further comprises CMOS or CCD video imaging device(s), which permit a user to view images captured by the at least one CMOS or CCD imaging device. According to one embodiment the insert and CMOS/CCD video imaging device(s) are disposable. In another embodiment they are reusable. In yet another embodiment, the angled tool further comprises one or more illumination devices arranged in an annulus around the one or more CMOS or CCD video imaging devices to enhance illumination at the surgical site.
In use, by providing one or more CMOS or CCD video imaging devices (which according to one embodiment further comprise at least one wireless transmitter for transmitting data wirelessly to at least one display) and illumination surrounding the video imaging devices, the surgeon has the ability to view and illuminate the patient operating site and/or the interior of the surgical cannula with the angled tool, in addition to any illumination that is provided by the cannula.
According to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, a tool (other than the angled tool described above) is provided that comprises at least one CMOS or CCD video imaging device, which permits a user to view images captured by the CMOS or CCD imaging device of the disc space or other surgical area to be operated on. For example, one or more specula, curettes, awls, blades, scrapers, or other surgical tools may incorporate the video insert described in greater detail below, for capturing and viewing images of the surgical site after dissection has occurred. This may be accomplished by providing a CMOS or CCD camera at the distal end of the one or more tools, and either wirelessly or hardwire transmitting the images captured by that CMOS or CCD camera to a display.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a tool is provided that comprises at least one CMOS or CCD video imaging device, which permits a user to view images captured by the CMOS or CCD imaging device of the disc space or other surgical area to be operated on. For example, one or more disc debridement tools may incorporate the video insert described in greater detail below, for capturing and viewing images of the intervertebral disc space after and during dissection. This capacity allows for a more complete and safe disc space preparation. A more precise carpentry of the disc space allows for an increased potential for fusion and a reduction of vertebral endplate or soft tissue injury. This may be accomplished by providing a CMOS or CCD camera at the distal end of the one or debridement tools, and either wirelessly or hardwire transmitting the images captured by that CMOS or CCD camera to a display.
Accordingly, the methods disclosed herein provide a surgeon viewing the operative site, instead of through the oculars of the microscope, but rather with the ability to view the patient's anatomy by presenting the images of the surgical site on a video screen or other display in front of him (or her) and in front of any assistant(s), consulting surgeons, hospital staff, etc. Due to the camera chip device and associated optics being placed directly at or immediately adjacent the operative site, the image collected is free from the distortions and the “field-flattening” effect commonly associated with complex optical stacks commonly used in operating microscopes and endoscopes. These novel apparatus and surgical methods result in a significant increase in “depth-cues” and color-reproduction. The camera device technology (preferably CCD or CMOS) provides a three dimensional-type picture to the surgeon with all necessary illumination and without the extra costs of adding a second camera and expensive intra-ocular optical orientations. The costs of the microscope and its maintenance, plastic draping, sterility/contamination issues and surgeon fatigue are either eliminated or substantially reduced.
A variety of other apparatus and methods may be employed in conjunction with the various aspects described herein to achieve fusion without departing from the spirit of the invention, such as the following apparatus and methods hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties: U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2010/0137690 to Miles, et al.; 2009/0299411 to Laskowitz, et al.; 2009/0299412 to Marino; 2009/0299477 to Clayton, et al.; 2009/0275995 to Truckai, et al.; 2009/0287262 to Bertagnoli; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,621,955 to Goble, et al. Accordingly, additional apparatus, such as a refractor or distractor may incorporate the use of fiberoptic bundles and/or camera inserts described in relation to
These cannulas, which may be inserted in progressively larger sizes (as will be described later), are constructed or formed in this manner so as to avoid or mitigate complications presented with the prior art (as described above). Specifically, the insertion of these cannulas with asymmetric cross-sections allows a user to expand the surgical area without expanding into a specific region(s) where the device may impinge upon nerves and other tissue.
Additionally or in place of a guide pin, a pilot cannula of slightly larger diameter may be inserted. This pilot cannula may either be placed around or proximal to the guide pin. The pilot cannula may further include means, such as conductive wires and sensors, to detect the proximity of nerves and nerve structures. Guide pins and/or pilot cannula(s) may further be used to direct the location of various dilators which may gradually expand the desired surgical area in a non-concentric or radially non-uniform fashion so as to allow adequate room for surgical tools and procedures, with reduced risk of impinging upon nerves. Specifically, dilators of the present invention are shaped in an asymmetric fashion so as to expand the surgical area in a defined radial direction(s) and to avoid impingement of the areas with higher concentrations of nerve structures.
Various devices of the present invention include anchoring means, such as screws and/or tangs and stakes to secure the devices once located in a desired position. These anchoring means further operate to reduce the risk of injury to the patient as repositioning or re-insertion of these and similar devices further increase the risk of damaging surrounding nerves and tissue. Once a sufficient degree of dilation of a surgical area is achieved, smaller cannula disposed within the larger cannula may be removed to allow for visibility and usable space within devices of larger diameters. Devices of larger diameters, such as dilators of an appropriate size, retractors, and working cannulas may be employed to stabilize the surgical area. These devices, including an outer working cannula, may be secured by previously discussed anchoring means or by external mounting devices. Outer working cannula, as will be apparent from the present disclosure, may include various additional features such as fiber-optic lighting elements, imaging equipment, luminescent materials, bioluminescent materials, etc.
For example, in one embodiment the working cannula 100 comprises a docking ridge 136 which comprises a generally annular protrusion from either a portion or the entirety of the outer circumference of the working cannula 100. The fiber optic cannula 116 may comprise a corresponding ridge or recession 140 at a variety of locations along its longitudinal length, which is adapted to receive the docking ridge 136 of the working cannula 100. In one embodiment, the outer diameter of the docking ridge of the working cannula is greater than both the outer diameter of the main portion of the working cannula and the inner diameter of the fiber optic cannula.
The fiber optic cannula is capable of expanding, for example, due to the inclusion of a compression gap 124. Thus, the fiber optic cannula may be elastically expanded around both the working cannula 100 and the docking ridge 136, and be slid or translated into a position where the docking ridge mates or corresponds with the receiving portion of the fiber optic cannula 116. In an alternative embodiment, docking between a fiber optic cannula 116 and a working cannula 100 is accomplished through one or more non-annular or non-rib like protrusions. For example, one or more protuberances of various sizes and shapes may be provided which interact and dock with corresponding features (e.g. female receiving portions) of a fiber optic cannula 116. One of skill in the art will recognize that receiving (or female) and corresponding (male) docking members may be disposed either on the working cannula 100 and/or the fiber optic cannulas 116a, 116b, 116c, 116d and the present invention is not limited to an embodiment wherein male or female docking portions reside on only one of the contemplated devices. Indeed, male and female portions may reside on either the working, fiber optic, or both cannulas.
In one embodiment, the compression gap of the fiber optic cannula 116 relies on the elastic abilities of the fiber optic cannula.116 to expand, accommodate a working cannula 100, and retract to (or approximately to) an initial position. In alternative embodiments, fiber optic cannulas 116 of the present invention comprise a compression gap 124 and/or additional devices useful for and capable of restricting an outer dimension of the fiber optic cannula 116 and thereby securing or attaching the fiber optic cannula 116 to a working cannula 100 or similar device. For example, various known devices may be employed to restrict an outer dimension of the fiber optic cannula, including but not limited to various straps comprising buckles, Velcro, teeth and receiving portions and adjustable strap fasteners.
As shown, working cannulas 100 are provided with at least one cylindrical housing 104 disposed on an exterior portion of the working cannula 100. As will be recognized, and as is described herein, working cannulas are not limited to any particular asymmetric geometry. Thus, D-shaped cross sections, U-shaped cross sections, and a variety of other combinations and alternatives, including crescent-shaped cross-sections, to the cross-sectional shapes are contemplated for use with working cannulas of the present invention.
While various embodiment of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and alterations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and alterations are within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure, as set forth in the following claims.
The foregoing discussion of the disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the disclosure to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the disclosure are grouped together in one or more embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the disclosure.
Moreover, though the present disclosure has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the disclosure, e.g. the use of disposable components comprising some or all of the apparatus described herein, as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/091,024 filed Apr. 20, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,864,654, issued Oct. 21, 2014), entitled “Method and Apparatus for Performing Retro Peritoneal Dissection” and claims the benefits of and priority, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/326,138, filed Apr. 20, 2010, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Performing Retro Peritoneal Dissection.” The present application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/507,367, filed on Oct. 6, 2014, entitled “Apparatus and Method of Spinal Implant and Fusion,” which is a continuation of Ser. No. 13/754,042, filed on Jan. 30, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,870,882, issued Oct. 28, 2014), which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/632,720, filed on Dec. 7, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,366,748, issued on Feb. 5, 2013), and which claims priority from provisional patent application No. 61/186,683, filed Jun. 12, 2009; as well as provisional patent application No. 61/120,260, filed Dec. 5, 2008. The present application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/965,654, filed on Dec. 10, 2010, entitled “Lateral Based Retractor System”, which is a non-provisional patent application which claims the benefit of priority from commonly owned U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/262,075, filed Dec. 10, 2009, and 61/323,984, filed Apr. 14, 2010. The entire contents of all of the above-referenced patent applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in this disclosure as if set forth fully herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3060972 | Sheldon | Oct 1962 | A |
3697011 | Christensen et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3741496 | Beller | Jun 1973 | A |
3836092 | Hull | Sep 1974 | A |
3900021 | Makepeace et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4039156 | Abraham | Aug 1977 | A |
4041939 | Hall | Aug 1977 | A |
4047524 | Hall | Sep 1977 | A |
4462402 | Burgio et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4467478 | Jurgutis | Aug 1984 | A |
4501269 | Bagby | Feb 1985 | A |
4522270 | Kishi | Jun 1985 | A |
4570623 | Ellison et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4592346 | Jurgutis | Jun 1986 | A |
4706653 | Yamamoto | Nov 1987 | A |
4753224 | Tojo | Jun 1988 | A |
4834069 | Umeda | May 1989 | A |
5037422 | Hayhurst | Aug 1991 | A |
5053038 | Sheehan | Oct 1991 | A |
5055104 | Ray | Oct 1991 | A |
5058823 | Emura et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5178129 | Chikama et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5271381 | Ailinger et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5290295 | Querals et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312407 | Carter | May 1994 | A |
5312417 | Wilk | May 1994 | A |
5324307 | Jarrett et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329834 | Wong | Jul 1994 | A |
5329935 | Takahashi | Jul 1994 | A |
5333812 | Sato | Aug 1994 | A |
5354292 | Braeuer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5395372 | Holt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5431658 | Moskovich | Jul 1995 | A |
D364462 | Michelson | Nov 1995 | S |
5483951 | Frassica et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512036 | Tamburrino et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5527312 | Ray | Jun 1996 | A |
5531664 | Adachi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541191 | Skotnicki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549607 | Olson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558674 | Heggeness et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
D374283 | Michelson | Oct 1996 | S |
5562661 | Yoshimi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569246 | Ojima et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5586989 | Bray | Dec 1996 | A |
5601557 | Hayhurst | Feb 1997 | A |
D378409 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | S |
5611800 | Davis et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5634925 | Urbanski | Jun 1997 | A |
5653763 | Errico et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662588 | Iida | Sep 1997 | A |
5662655 | Laboureau et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665122 | Kambin | Sep 1997 | A |
5667473 | Finn et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5688285 | Yamada | Nov 1997 | A |
5697932 | Smith et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704892 | Adair | Jan 1998 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5779642 | Nightengale | Jul 1998 | A |
5782919 | Zdeblick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785658 | Benaron et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797918 | McGuire et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807261 | Benaron et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827177 | Oneda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836948 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836958 | Ralph | Nov 1998 | A |
5860977 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865746 | Murugesan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865846 | Bryan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871462 | Yoder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888228 | Knothe et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904689 | Jonjic | May 1999 | A |
5925051 | Mikhail | Jul 1999 | A |
5929901 | Adair et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944686 | Patterson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947972 | Gage et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961445 | Chikama | Oct 1999 | A |
5976146 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986693 | Adair et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989257 | Tidwell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997895 | Narotam et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004326 | Castro et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013028 | Jho et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019765 | Thornhill et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030356 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030388 | Yoshimi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030390 | Mehdizadeh | Feb 2000 | A |
6030401 | Marino | Feb 2000 | A |
6033408 | Gage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043839 | Adair et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045555 | Smith et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6090143 | Meriwether et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096080 | Nicholson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113602 | Sand | Sep 2000 | A |
6120503 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
6136001 | Michelson | Oct 2000 | A |
6142932 | Morizumi | Nov 2000 | A |
6142998 | Smith et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146420 | McKay | Nov 2000 | A |
6149096 | Hartley | Nov 2000 | A |
6159245 | Meriwether et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180085 | Achilefu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184923 | Miyazaki | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209886 | Estes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211904 | Adair et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216573 | Moutafis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224599 | Baynham et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235805 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238397 | Zucherman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241733 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241769 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245108 | Biscup | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258094 | Nicholson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261293 | Nicholson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261295 | Nicholson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261296 | Aebi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275255 | Adair et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287319 | Aboul-Hosn | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290724 | Marino | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299613 | Ogilvie et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309395 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310642 | Adair et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325805 | Ogilvie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328738 | Suddaby | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336928 | Guerin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6364828 | Yeung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6364880 | Michelson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375635 | Moutafis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6451017 | Moutafis et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454806 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467556 | Alsruhe | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6500206 | Bryan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511493 | Moutafis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520976 | Gage | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524318 | Longhini et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6543392 | Ashton, III et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564078 | Marino et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6616669 | Ogilvie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620356 | Wong et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6641613 | Sennett | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648915 | Sazy | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652533 | O'Neil | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669710 | Moutafis et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673113 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6676637 | Bonnette et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679887 | Nicholson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682493 | Mirigian | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699288 | Moret | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709438 | Dixon et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719752 | Ouchi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719760 | Dorchak et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719795 | Cornwall et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730125 | Lin | May 2004 | B1 |
6743257 | Castro | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6773437 | Ogilvie et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800093 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6824565 | Muhanna et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830574 | Heckele et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6899712 | Moutafis et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6923792 | Staid et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929646 | Gambale | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942665 | Gambale | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960182 | Moutafis et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6962592 | Gatturna et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969523 | Mattern et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6974480 | Messerli et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7004946 | Parker et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008431 | Simonson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7014640 | Kemppainen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025742 | Rubenstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025769 | Ferree | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7030904 | Adair et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033317 | Pruitt | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041136 | Goble et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7077864 | Byrd, III et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7094257 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7122017 | Moutafis et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135043 | Nakahara et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7182782 | Kirschman | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7204825 | Cimino et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207992 | Ritland | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214186 | Ritland | May 2007 | B2 |
7223292 | Messerli et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7232463 | Falahee | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238203 | Bagga et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255703 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267691 | Keller et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288093 | Michelson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7337538 | Moutafis et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7341590 | Ferree | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7341591 | Grinberg | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347860 | Ouchi | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7357284 | Jauvin | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357804 | Binder, Jr. et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7361178 | Hearn et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371239 | Dec et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373197 | Daighighian et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377923 | Purcell et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387643 | Michelson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399041 | Prentner et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
D574495 | Petersen | Aug 2008 | S |
7406775 | Funk et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410334 | McGrew | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410478 | Yang | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413065 | Gauthier | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413543 | Banik et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421772 | Gao et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7429270 | Baumgartner et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430945 | Gauthier et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7431711 | Moutafis et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442208 | Mathieu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455157 | Kimes et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473255 | McGarity et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7476226 | Weikel et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478577 | Wheeler | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7481766 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481813 | Purcell | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7485145 | Purcell | Feb 2009 | B2 |
D589626 | Petersen | Mar 2009 | S |
7501073 | Wen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503933 | Michelson | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503934 | Eisermann et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503936 | Trieu | Mar 2009 | B2 |
D590943 | Petersen | Apr 2009 | S |
D593202 | Petersen | May 2009 | S |
7531003 | Reindel | May 2009 | B2 |
7534270 | Ball | May 2009 | B2 |
7553320 | Molz, IV et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578786 | Boulais et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582058 | Miles et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7582107 | Trail et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591783 | Boulais et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
D603502 | Petersen | Nov 2009 | S |
7618423 | Valentine et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7621955 | Goble et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637905 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641659 | Emstad | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655027 | Michelson | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7658766 | Melkent et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674297 | Falahee | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7677418 | Henniges et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686805 | Michelson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691133 | Partin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7693562 | Marino et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708761 | Petersen | May 2010 | B2 |
7717685 | Moutafis et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722530 | Davison | May 2010 | B2 |
7722613 | Sutterlin et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728868 | Razzaque et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730563 | Sklar et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7734327 | Colquhoun | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740634 | Orbay et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740661 | Baratz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744555 | DiMauro et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744637 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744973 | Schoenle et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749231 | Bonvallet et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749253 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749269 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749273 | Cauthen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749274 | Razian | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749276 | Fitz | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749279 | Twomey et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7751865 | Jascob et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753911 | Ray et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753914 | Ruhling et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753938 | Aschmann et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753940 | Veldman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753962 | Melder | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758501 | Frasier et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758616 | LeHuec et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758617 | Iott et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758644 | Trieu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758648 | Castleman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762950 | Hirata | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763025 | Assell et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763035 | Melkent et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763055 | Foley | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763078 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763080 | Southworth | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D621509 | Lovell | Aug 2010 | S |
D622395 | Iott et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7766914 | McCormack et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766918 | Allard et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766930 | DiPoto et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766940 | Kwak et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766967 | Francis | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766969 | Justin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769422 | DiSilvestro et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771143 | Bharadwaj et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771475 | Michelson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771476 | Justis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771479 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776040 | Markworth et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776046 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776047 | Fanger et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776049 | Curran et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7776075 | Bruneau et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776090 | Winslow et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776091 | Mastrorio et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776094 | McKinley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776095 | Peterman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776594 | Bays et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780707 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794396 | Gattani et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794501 | Edie et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799034 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799036 | Davison et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799053 | Haid et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799054 | Kwak et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799055 | Lim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799056 | Sankaran | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799076 | Sybert et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799078 | Embry et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799083 | Smith et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806901 | Stad et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811327 | Hansell et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811329 | Ankney et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815681 | Ferguson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819801 | Miles et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824328 | Gattani et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7824332 | Fakhrai | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7824410 | Simonson | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828724 | Hosoi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828804 | Li et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828845 | Estes et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828849 | Lim | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837713 | Petersen | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837732 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7850598 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850735 | Eisermann et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850736 | Heinz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7918845 | Saadat et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8043211 | Hirata | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8088163 | Kleiner | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8118732 | Banik et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8289381 | Bayer et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8337455 | Boulais | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8425408 | Boulais et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8475366 | Boulais et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8864654 | Kleiner et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20020022764 | Smith et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020168319 | Filleret et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030055418 | Tasto et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083748 | Lee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030195405 | Marino et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222325 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024466 | Heerklotz | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040087956 | Weikel et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040138529 | Wiltshire et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143330 | Sazy | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153158 | Errico et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176853 | Sennett et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230211 | Moutafis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249367 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004433 | Hirata | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014996 | Konomura et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075538 | Banik et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080411 | Ouchi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119527 | Banik et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124993 | Chappuis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124994 | Berger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149035 | Pimenta et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149192 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159765 | Moutafis et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177027 | Hirata | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182291 | Hirata | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191046 | Dehmel et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216002 | Simonson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216018 | Sennett | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240077 | Rovegno | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250990 | Le et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267443 | Staid et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272977 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283150 | Moutafis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004367 | Alamin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058584 | Hirata | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063973 | Makower et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074307 | Igarashi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095116 | Bolduc et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100304 | Vresilovic et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111779 | Petersen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111780 | Petersen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060155170 | Hanson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167461 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178560 | Saadat et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183975 | Saadat et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189845 | Maahs et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190081 | Kraus | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191975 | Adams et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229550 | Staid et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247650 | Yerby et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264808 | Staid et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270900 | Chin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070003598 | Trieu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073110 | Larson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088326 | Kennedy, II | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070147033 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173695 | Hirata | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191684 | Hirata | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208423 | Messerli et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213596 | Hamada | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213717 | Trieu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213718 | Trieu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213822 | Trieu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242869 | Luo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244366 | Murata | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250166 | McKay | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270639 | Long | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270951 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276406 | Mahoney et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288007 | Burkus et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080003255 | Kerr et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009929 | Harris et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015413 | Barlow et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033440 | Moskowitz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039693 | Karasawa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058606 | Miles et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065110 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080147018 | Squilla et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147191 | Lopez et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154375 | Serhan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154377 | Voellmicke | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195058 | Moutafis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195128 | Orbay et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080255564 | Michelson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269904 | Voorhies | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012358 | Ichihashi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036739 | Hadani | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043312 | Koulisis | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076440 | Moutafis et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076556 | McGarity et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090098184 | Govil et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112062 | Bakos | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124860 | Miles et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125066 | Krau et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171150 | Iede et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187072 | Manohara | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192350 | Meja | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192403 | Gharib et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198245 | Phan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090198337 | Phan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090198338 | Phan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090198339 | Kleiner et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203965 | Fujiyama et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203967 | Branch et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204148 | Lenke | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204159 | Justis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204220 | Trieu | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222011 | Lehuec et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242612 | Adams et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253958 | Ito et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259108 | Miles et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275995 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287262 | Bertagnoli | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090297136 | Lin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299411 | Laskowitz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299412 | Marino | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299477 | Clayton et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306692 | Barrington et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010367 | Foley et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010524 | Barrington et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016903 | Matityahu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016972 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016973 | de Villiers et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030065 | Farr et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036226 | Marino et al. | Feb 2010 | A9 |
20100036442 | Lauryssen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042221 | Boyd | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100048993 | Shidara | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057208 | Dryer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063516 | Parmer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063554 | Branch et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076335 | Gharib et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076445 | Pagano | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076446 | Gorek | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082036 | Reiley et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087875 | McGahan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100141 | de Villiers et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105111 | Asano et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105986 | Miles et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105987 | Miles et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121365 | O'Sullivan et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121453 | Peterman | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125333 | Zdeblick et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125338 | Fitz | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131020 | Heinz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137690 | Miles et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137923 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145390 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145391 | Kleiner | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145452 | Blaylock et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145461 | Landry et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160923 | Sand et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160982 | Justis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161062 | Foley et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161074 | McKay | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168755 | Reiley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168862 | Edie et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174326 | Selover et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191334 | Keller | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191337 | Zamani et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199483 | Justis et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204798 | Gerbec et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217398 | Keller | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222784 | Schwab et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222824 | Simonson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228294 | LeHuec et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228351 | Ankney et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234848 | Sutterlin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234957 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256767 | Melkent | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100256768 | Lim et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262241 | Eisermann et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286778 | Eisermann et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286784 | Curran et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298938 | Humphreys et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312103 | Gorek et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312290 | McKinley et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312347 | Arramon et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110034769 | Adair et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071536 | Kleiner et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110108604 | Adams et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110156141 | Roig-Guitart et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110201887 | Greenblatt | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238006 | Crank | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2004030527 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2005037149 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2011011372 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Official Action for European Patent Application No. 12773535.5, dated Nov. 11, 2015 4 pages. |
Ray, C., “Facet Joint Disorders and Back Pain,” published on Spine-Health, Dec. 10, 2002, available at www.spine-health.com/conditions/arthritis/facet-joint-disorders-and-back-pain, 1 page. |
Staehler, R., “Spine Surgery for a Cervical Herniated Disc,” published on Spine-Health, Jun. 12, 2002, available at www.spine-health.com/conditions/herniated-disc/spine-surgery-a-cervical-herniated-disc, 2 pages. |
Staehler, R., “Summary of Cervical Herniated Disc Treatment Options,” published on Spine-Health, Jun. 12, 2002, available at www.spine-health.com/conditions/herniated-disc/summary-cervical-herniated-disc-treatment-options, 1 page. |
Ullrich, P.F., “Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Surgery,” published on Spine-Health, Oct. 7, 2005, available at www.spine-health.com/treatment/back-surgery/anterior-cervical-spinal-fusion-surgery, 2 pages. |
Ullrich, P.F., “Cervical Spinal Instrumentation,” published on Spine-Health, Oct. 7, 2005, available at www.spine-health.com/treatment/back-surgery/cervical-spinal-instrumentation, 2 pages. |
Wascher, T.M., “Anterior cervical decompression and spine fusion procedure,” published on Spine-Health, Aug. 29, 2001, available at www.spine-health.com/treatment/spinal-fusion/anterior-cervical-decompression-and-spine-fusion-procedure, 2 pages. |
“BAK® /Proximity™ (BP®)) Cage”, Zimmer Website, as early as Oct. 23, 2007, available at http://www.zimmer.com/z/ctl/op/global/action/1/id/7930/template/MP/prcat/M6/prod/y, printed on Jun. 8, 2009, 1 page. |
“BAK® Vista® Radiolucent Interbody Fusion System”, Zimmer Website, as early as Oct. 25, 2005, available at http://www.zimmerindia.com/z/ctl/op/global/action/1/id/7809/template/MP/prcat/M6/prod/y, printed on Jun. 8, 2009, pp. 1-2. |
“Facet Joint Syndrome,” The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, copyright 1995-2008, printed Nov. 19, 2008, available at http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/facet—joint—syndrome/hic—facet—joint—syndrome.aspx, 2 pages. |
“Screws, Cages or Both”, Spine Universe Website, as early as Aug. 18, 2002, available at http://www.spineuniverse.com/displayarticle.php/article1363.html, printed on Jun. 8, 2009, pp. 1-13. |
“University of Maryland Spine Program: A Patient's Guide to Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Intervertebral Cages”, University of Maryland Medical Center website, as early as 2003, available at http://www.umm.edu/spinecenter/education/anterior—lumbar—interbody—fusion—with—intervertebral—cages.htm, printed on Jun. 8, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
“Vertebral column,” from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed May 19, 2009, retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertebral—column, 6 pages. |
“Zygapophysial joint,” from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed May 19, 2009, retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zygapophysial—joint, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/021159, mailed May 23, 2012 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/021159, mailed Oct. 31, 2013 9 pages. |
Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 12773535.5, dated Aug. 20, 2014 7 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/091,024, mailed Apr. 26, 2013, 20 pages. |
Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/091,024, mailed Sep. 12, 2013, 18 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/091,024, mailed Jan. 9, 2014, 20 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/091,024, mailed Jun. 4, 2014 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150094533 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61326138 | Apr 2010 | US | |
61186683 | Jun 2009 | US | |
61120260 | Dec 2008 | US | |
61262075 | Dec 2009 | US | |
61323984 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13754042 | Jan 2013 | US |
Child | 14507367 | US | |
Parent | 12632720 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13754042 | US | |
Parent | 14519880 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 13754042 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13091024 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 14519880 | US | |
Parent | 14507367 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 13091024 | US | |
Parent | 12965654 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14519880 | US |