Not Applicable.
The present application relates to the method of monitoring polarization mode dispersion (PMD) using heterodyne detection for providing PMD compensation in optical networks, and an apparatus for monitoring PMD.
As optical networks move to higher speed modulation, such as 10 or 40 Gb/s, PMD is recognized as a source of signal distortion and increased bit error rates which may result in system outages. PMD causes pulse broadening, eventually making individual data bits indistinguishable. PMD varies widely with wavelength, and therefore compensation at one wavelength may actually increase PMD at another wavelength. Therefore, PMD detection must be wavelength specific, and compensation must be channel specific.
Known compensators typically measure the distortion, for instance by measuring the degree of polarization (DOP) of a single channel and provide compensation for the single channel. Although this approach works well, it requires a complex compensator and monitor for each channel, resulting in high cost for the overall transmission system.
A simplified broad band PMD monitor is still highly desirable to make high speed transmission possible.
A broad band system for measuring state of polarization (SOP) is disclosed in U.S. patent application publication No. 2002/0140943 by Dipakbin Chowdhury et al. published Oct. 3, 2002. The system discloses a tunable local oscillator which is operatively connected to a polarization transformer for transforming the local optical signal to a selected one of a plurality of polarization states. The polarized local optical signal is then combined with the transmitted optical signal and directed to a heterodyne detector to detect the beat frequency for determining the SOP of the transmitted optical signal. For each selected wavelength of the tunable local oscillator, three different polarization states are measured, prior to scanning to a next selected wavelength. This process is both slow and complex, requiring two degrees of control to the local oscillator, wavelength and polarization state. The polarization controller is expensive and relatively slow. The slow response is compounded by the need to obtain sequentially measurement of three different polarization states for each wavelength.
In the present invention, a broadband PMD monitor is disclosed based on heterodyne detection with a tunable laser source which can be fed to a compensator such as an add/drop or other wavelength switch and polarization dependent attenuation means.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a method of monitoring polarization mode dispersion (PMD) to determine a PMD of one or more channels within an optical link comprising the steps of:
In embodiments of the invention, a polarization mode dispersion (PMD) monitor comprises:
a local tunable optical source;
an optical beam combiner having a first input port for receiving a multiple wavelength optical signal, and a second input port for receiving a narrow line width optical signal at a selected wavelength from the tunable source, and an output port for outputting a combined light beam;
an optical splitter for dividing the light beam into two subbeams such that a polarization state of each of the two subbeams is orthogonal to the other, and that optical power of the narrow line width optical signal is substantially equally divided;
a first heterodyne detector for detecting amplitude and phase of a predetermined beat frequency of the first subbeam;
a second heterodyne detector for detecting amplitude and phase of the predetermined beat frequency of the second subbeam; and
a processor for comparing the detected amplitude and phase of each heterodyne detector to calculate a state of polarization (SOP) of the selected wavelength, and to store a plurality of calculated SOP values to determine the PMD of a predetermined wavelength band.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
PMD is characterized by a change in transmitted polarization state as function of frequency.
A very powerful and convenient method of measuring SOP as a function of optical frequency is by heterodyne detection of the signal. As illustrated in
In a fiber with PMD each frequency band sees a slightly different birefringence and as a result each frequency band sees a slightly different output polarization as well as a different delay time. Measuring the change in polarization with wavelength therefore is a measure of the delay of the different frequencies which in turn determines the PMD distortion of the signal.
The choice of center band and bandwidth of the electrical filter 28 determines the frequency resolution of the measured SOP, eg. twice the center frequency plus the bandwidth of the filter. For example, an optical channel with 25 GHz bandwidth, and a filter center frequency of 10 MHz and a frequency bandwidth of 5 MHz (a resolution of 25 MHz) provides 1000 resolution points for measuring SOP of the channel. The signal strength would also be reduced by a factor of 1000 as compared to the optical signal, however the tunable laser or local oscillator provides substantial heterodyne RF gain which may mitigate the optical losses. To further improve the signal to noise ratio the measured signal may be averaged. Alternatively, the tunable laser can be modulated at a very low frequency (100 Hz–1 KHz) and electronic phase lock detection can be used as a noise filter to improve the signal to noise ratio.
Alternative compensators which provide continuous PMD compensation on demand for all channels without switching are attractive to avoid signal disruption.
The embodiment(s) of the invention described above is(are) intended to be exemplary only. The scope of the invention is therefore intended to be limited solely by the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application No. 60/386,716 filed Jun. 10, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5400167 | Suemura | Mar 1995 | A |
5822100 | Robinson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6486958 | Szafraniec et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6563590 | Chowdhury et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6885783 | Bandemer et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7085501 | Rickard et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20020140943 | Chowdhury et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0167649 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040008991 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60386716 | Jun 2002 | US |