This application is related to co-pending applications Ser. No. 12/327,050, filed Dec. 3, 2008, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT USING FILL TUBE; and Ser. No. 12/327,053, filed Dec. 3, 2008, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT USING QUARTZ CRYSTAL; which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to measurement of pressures in an industrial processes. More specifically, the present invention relates to a pressure sensor having a sensor body.
Industrial processes are used in the manufacturing and transport of many types of materials. In such systems, it is often required to measure different types of pressure within the process. One type of pressure which is frequently measured is a differential pressure which is the pressure difference between one point in the process and another point in the process. For example, the differential pressure across an orifice plate in a tube containing a flow of process fluid is related to the flow rate of the fluid. Differential pressures can also be used, for example, to measure height of a process fluid in a tank or other container.
In such industrial processes, the pressure sensors are typically contained in, or coupled to, a pressure transmitter which is located at a remote location and transmits the pressure information back to a centralized location such as a control room. The transmission is frequently over a process control loop. For example, a two wire process control loop is often used in which two wires are used to carry both information as well as power to the transmitter. Wireless communication techniques may also be used.
In many process installations, it is also desirable to measure an absolute or gauge pressure, herein referred to a “line pressure”, of the process. This information can be used, for example, to provide more accurate flow measurements by including changes in density of the process fluid in the flow calculations. Typically, the additional pressure measurement requires an additional pressure sensor coupled to the process fluid. For example, an additional pressure transmitter can be deployed which includes a line pressure sensor and coupled to the two wire process control loop.
A pressure sensor includes a sensor body which is arranged to couple to a process pressure. A magnetic property of the sensor body changes based upon applied pressure.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides an apparatus and method for determining line pressure in a differential pressure measurement configuration. More specifically, in one aspect, the present invention monitors deformations in a capillary tube used to couple a differential pressure sensor to process fluid. These deformations are related to line pressure of the process fluid. In other embodiments, the present invention provides techniques for measuring a pressure based upon deformation of a vessel. In another embodiment, the present invention provides a sensor for measuring line pressure.
Transmitter 36 is a process measurement device that receives process pressures through the impulse piping 34. The transmitter 36 senses a differential process pressure and converts it to a standardized transmission signal that is a function of the process pressure.
A process loop 38 provides both a power signal to the transmitter 36 from control room 40 and bidirectional communication, and can be constructed in accordance with a number of process communication protocols. In the illustrated example, the process loop 38 is a two-wire loop. The two-wire loop is used to transmit all power to and all communications to and from the transmitter 36 during normal operations with a 4-20 mA signal. A computer 42 or other information handling system through modem 44, or other network interface, is used for communication with the transmitter 36. A remote voltage power supply 46 powers the transmitter 36. In another example configuration, loop 38 is a wireless connection in which data may be transmitted or received with out the need of wires extending between the transmitter 36 and the control room 40. In other example configurations, data is transmitted and/or received wirelessly using a wireless communication protocol.
Also illustrated in
In accordance with the present invention, a deformation sensor 98 couples to a capillary tube 93 and is arranged to monitor deformation of the capillary tube 93. These deformations are related to the line pressure of the industrial process and the sensor 98 provides an output signal to analog to digital converter 62 or to line pressure measurement circuitry 99. In one aspect, any type of sensor can be used which is responsive to deformations of the tube. Circuitry 99 can be stand alone circuitry or, in some configurations, may be embodied in other circuitry used to measure the differential pressure. For example, some or all of the components used to monitor the various sensors may be shared components.
Pressure sensor 56 is formed from two pressure sensor halves 114 and 116 and filled with a preferably brittle, substantially incompressible material 105. A diaphragm 106 is suspended within a cavity 132,134 formed within the sensor 56. An outer wall of the cavity 132, 134 carries electrodes 146,144,148 and 150. These can, generally, be referred to as primary electrodes 144 and 148, and secondary or secondary electrodes 146 and 150. These electrodes form capacitors with respect to the moveable diaphragm 106. The capacitors, again, can be referred to as primary and secondary capacitors.
As illustrated in
The deformation sensor 98 may take various configurations. A number of example techniques for measuring the deformation are described below. However, in one broad aspect, the present invention is not limited to these particular techniques and any technique used to measure deformation may be employed including those that are not specifically discussed herein.
The line pressure from the process fluid causes the capillary tube 93 to change shape. For example, an increased line pressure may cause the capillary tube 93 to expand. Similarly, an increased line pressure may cause any bends in the capillary tube 93 to become straighter. These, or other deformations of a capillary tube, can be monitored or otherwise measured and correlated with the line pressure of the process fluid.
In the configuration of
Any appropriate magnetostrictive material may be used in accordance with the design constraints for a particular application.
where g, E, l, and ρ are respectively, the gravitational acceleration constant, the tube's Young's Modulus, length, and density of the tube 162. By placement of the drive coil 190 which generates the magnetic field, along with the sensor coil 192 it is possible to construct a positive feedback oscillator. The drive coil and sensor coil are schematically depicted in
As discussed herein, the present invention is not limited to these specific techniques for measuring deformation. Another example embodiment of the present invention utilizes the stress dependent magnetic permeability, for example, of nickel-iron alloys. Nickel-iron alloys exhibit a change in their magnetic permeability when the material is placed under strain. This behavior is referred to as the Villari effect. If the alloy is magnetically biased with a fixed magnetic field (H), the resulting magnetic induction (B) is defined according to:
B=μ0μRH EQ. 2
Where, μ0 is the permeability of free space and μR is the relative permeability of the alloy. In accordance with Equation 2, any change with μR will result in a change in the magnetic inductance B.
The above magnetic properties can be used to detect applied pressure. For example, the change in the B field can be measured using a coil having an inductance which is proportional to μR.
In other design configurations, a second deformation sensor can be applied to the second fill tube. Using such a configuration, a redundancy check can be provided in which the outputs from the two deformation sensors are compared. Similarly, a differential pressure may be obtained by subtracting the pressure associated with one of the deformation sensors with the pressure associated with the other deformation sensor. Although the deformation sensor discussed herein is illustrated as being associated with the fill tube portion of the capillary tube, the sensor can be located along any appropriate region of the capillary tube and is not limited to this configuration. In another example configuration, the drive coil is associated with one of the capillary tubes while the sensor coil is associated with the other capillary tube. In such a configuration, line pressure as well as differential pressure may be obtained by monitoring the duty cycle in addition to the frequency of oscillation. Any appropriate material which illustrates a magnetostrictive effect may be used including, for example, Ni-Span, Alloy 52, a nickel-iron alloy, etc. Preferably, the oscillator is configured as a positive feedback oscillator.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. As used herein, line pressure refers to both absolute and gauge pressure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2533339 | Willenborg | Dec 1950 | A |
3012432 | Moore et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3169402 | Baker | Feb 1965 | A |
3218863 | Calvert | Nov 1965 | A |
3232712 | Stearns | Feb 1966 | A |
3249833 | Vosteen | May 1966 | A |
3374112 | Danon | Mar 1968 | A |
3410135 | Reynaud | Nov 1968 | A |
3557621 | Ferran | Jan 1971 | A |
3561832 | Karrer et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3697835 | Satori | Oct 1972 | A |
3808480 | Johnston | Apr 1974 | A |
3924219 | Braun | Dec 1975 | A |
4008619 | Alcaide et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4120206 | Rud | Oct 1978 | A |
4158217 | Bell | Jun 1979 | A |
4161123 | Carpenter | Jul 1979 | A |
4168518 | Lee | Sep 1979 | A |
4177496 | Bell et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4227419 | Park | Oct 1980 | A |
4244226 | Green et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4287553 | Braunlich | Sep 1981 | A |
4322775 | Delatorre | Mar 1982 | A |
4336567 | Anastasia | Jun 1982 | A |
4358814 | Lee et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4370890 | Frick | Feb 1983 | A |
4389895 | Rud, Jr. | Jun 1983 | A |
4422125 | Antonazzi et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4422335 | Ohnesorge et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4434451 | Delatorre | Feb 1984 | A |
4455874 | Paros | Jun 1984 | A |
4458537 | Bell et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4466290 | Frick | Aug 1984 | A |
4490773 | Moffatt | Dec 1984 | A |
4531415 | Orlowski et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4538466 | Kerber | Sep 1985 | A |
4542436 | Carusillo | Sep 1985 | A |
4558184 | Busch-Vishniac et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4562742 | Bell | Jan 1986 | A |
4578735 | Knecht et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4586108 | Frick | Apr 1986 | A |
4604901 | Kagi | Aug 1986 | A |
4619144 | Fremery et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4623813 | Naito et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4644796 | Ward | Feb 1987 | A |
4670733 | Bell | Jun 1987 | A |
4739666 | Hafner et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741213 | Hojoh | May 1988 | A |
4785669 | Benson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4829826 | Valentin et al. | May 1989 | A |
4860232 | Lee et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864874 | Hafner | Sep 1989 | A |
4875369 | Delatorre | Oct 1989 | A |
4878012 | Schulte et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878385 | Lloyd | Nov 1989 | A |
4926674 | Fossum et al. | May 1990 | A |
4938069 | Shoji et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4951174 | Grantham et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4977480 | Nishihara | Dec 1990 | A |
4995265 | Stocker | Feb 1991 | A |
5012677 | Shimada et al. | May 1991 | A |
5094109 | Dean et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136885 | Liebermann et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144841 | Brouwers et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5165284 | Shoji et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168419 | Delatorre | Dec 1992 | A |
5194819 | Briefer | Mar 1993 | A |
5230250 | Delatorre | Jul 1993 | A |
5233875 | Obermeier et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5291795 | Hafner | Mar 1994 | A |
5329818 | Frick et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5349868 | Shoji et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355714 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5415048 | Diatschenko et al. | May 1995 | A |
5469749 | Shimada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471882 | Wiggins | Dec 1995 | A |
5490424 | Shoji et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492016 | Pinto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5524492 | Frick | Jun 1996 | A |
5531120 | Nagasu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542300 | Lee | Aug 1996 | A |
5637802 | Frick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642301 | Warrior et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5705751 | Briefer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5705978 | Frick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5757608 | Bernot et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760310 | Rud et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5911162 | Denner | Jun 1999 | A |
5920016 | Broden | Jul 1999 | A |
5969258 | Gerst et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992240 | Tsuruoka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003219 | Frick et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6236096 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250164 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6295875 | Frick et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301973 | Smith | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6484585 | Sittler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484586 | Dutoit et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6508131 | Frick | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6520020 | Lutz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539807 | Wohlrab et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543291 | Kurtz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564643 | Horie et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6647794 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654697 | Eryurek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662662 | Nord et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675655 | Broden | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6701274 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6828801 | Burdick et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6892582 | Satou et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901101 | Frick | May 2005 | B2 |
6945115 | Wang | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6992492 | Burdick et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7104137 | Baudendistel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7379629 | Burns | May 2008 | B1 |
7467555 | Schulte et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7540196 | Kurtz et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7624642 | Romo | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20020117006 | Paros et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020178827 | Wang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040015069 | Brown | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040093951 | Viola et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040168523 | Fernald et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040233458 | Frick | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050005712 | Gysling et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050011278 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050041375 | Rosenau | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063444 | Frick | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097963 | Wilda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132808 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060070448 | Baumann et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060206288 | Brahmajosyula et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060232281 | Vittorio et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060278005 | Broden et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278007 | Harasyn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070220985 | Hedtke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1192272 | Sep 1998 | CN |
1 932 899 | Jan 1971 | DE |
3340834 | May 1985 | DE |
43 33 753 | May 1994 | DE |
0 423 903 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 524 550 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0291393 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1 026 493 | Aug 2000 | EP |
941804 | Jan 1949 | FR |
1530952 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2178536 | Feb 1987 | GB |
2005280536 | Oct 2005 | JP |
WO 9304343 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 9304349 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 9953286 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0159418 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0159419 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0223148 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2005033643 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006092052 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2007019676 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100132473 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |