This invention relates generally to the manufacture of components used in complex machines such as aircraft engines, and more specifically to the process control of burnishing operations in production.
As is well known and widely described in the turbine engine art, components such as the blades and vanes in such complex machines operate at high mechanical and thermal cyclic loading conditions. In addition they are often subject to high cycle vibratory stresses during operation. Cracks initiating from low cycle and high cycle fatigue loading conditions, or from foreign object damage (FOD), may propagate in the presence of excessive tensile stress loading conditions. One way to improve the fatigue life of components is to induce compressive stress conditions at selected locations within the component.
There are known methods to induce compressive residual stresses within components during manufacturing. The use of shot peening during manufacturing is well known in the art. In shot peening, a stream of media is directed at the surface of the component at high velocity, causing plastic deformation and residual compressive stresses in the component. Laser Shock Peening (LSP) is another method that has been used successfully to induce residual compressive stresses in components. Laser shock peening typically uses multiple radiation pulses from a laser to produce shock waves on the surface of a component which induces residual compressive stresses. Another method of inducing compressive residual stresses within components is by precision deep peening with a mechanical indenter, for example as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,729 issued to Bailey et al. and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
Burnishing methods such as Deep Roller Burnishing (DRB) and Low Plasticity Burnishing (LPB) have been used in manufacturing for various purposes, including the inducement of residual compressive stresses in components. In such processes, a burnishing element such as a roller or ball is pressed against the surface of a component and moved along a selected path on the component. The pressing force used during burnishing is such that it induces plastic strain and residual compressive stresses within the component near the burnished region. Burnishing tools are typically hydraulically operated, using a pressurized fluid to force the burnishing element onto the surface of the component. Mechanically loaded tools are also used.
Although conceptually simple, burnishing processes need methods to control their results in a high volume production environment. There are several parameters, such as fluid pressure, volume flow, spring loads, surface conditions, lubrication efficiency, burnishing element wear, etc. that can influence the residual stresses obtained from burnishing. Currently burnishing process control relies primarily on freezing all parameters and tooling, and inferring that the end result of the burnishing process is adequately controlled. Although some of the machine control parameters such as pressures, speeds etc. can be can be monitored during manufacturing, these generally are not adequate to verify process control variations from other sources. Geometric measurements and visual assessments provide only limited evaluation of the burnished component. The beneficial residual stresses imparted to the interior region of the burnished component cannot be easily measured non-destructively. Accordingly, there is a need for a device and method to enable burnishing process control that simulates the entire process as applied to a component in production without the need for frequent, expensive, or destructive evaluations of the treated components.
The above-mentioned need is met by the present invention, which according to one aspect provides an apparatus and method using burnishing process control coupons are described that can be used for process control of the burnishing process. These simulate the total burnishing process as applied to a part in a production environment and are similarly sensitive to process variations that may affect the final result on the components.
According to another aspect of the invention, the apparatus for process control of a burnishing process comprises a body, two ends, at least one process control coupon, and means for attaching the process control coupon to the body. At least one edge of the process control coupon is clamped along its entire length during burnishing. The process control coupons are made from commercially available and low cost materials such as spring steel. They can also be made from the same material as the components, such as titanium.
According to another aspect of the invention, In another embodiment, the apparatus has a coupon support which provides lateral support to the coupons during burnishing. Two process control coupons can be mounted in the apparatus and burnished simultaneously.
According to another aspect of the invention, a new method of process control for burnishing of components includes selecting at least one process control coupon, selecting an apparatus for holding them, attaching them to the apparatus, selecting a region on the surface of the process control coupon for burnishing. Using a burnishing process, a patch is then burnished on the selected region. After burnishing, at least one physical parameter at a selected location of the process control coupon is measured. These physical parameters may include deflections, cold work, residual stresses, plastic strains, X-Ray diffraction results, etc. in the coupons resulting from the burnishing operations. Based on previously established correlations with the burnishing results on components, the measurements on the process control coupons effect process control in production.
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings wherein identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views,
In the embodiment shown in
In another embodiment of the present invention, schematically shown in
In another embodiment of the present invention, shown in
The apparatus described above is used for the process control of the burnishing process. As noted above, there are several variables that can affect the results of burnishing operations. Process variations in these variables can be difficult or impossible to monitor in production applications where burnishing is performed on hundreds of components. The method of process control described in this specification enables a cost effective and simple way of monitoring the burnishing process in a production environment.
The method comprises selecting at least one process control coupon 100, selecting an apparatus 10 for holding the process control coupon 100, attaching the coupon 100 to the apparatus 10, selecting a region on the surface of the process control coupon 100 for burnishing, burnishing a patch on the selected region and measuring at least one physical parameter of the process control coupon 100 after burnishing. These steps are further detailed below.
A process control coupon 100 is selected for burnishing using the same burnishing tool and process as used for the burnishing of components in production. This coupon 100 typically has a rectangular shape, approximately 7.62 cm (3 in.) long and 1.9 cm (0.75 in.) wide, with a substantially constant thickness of about 1.3 mm (0.050 in.) Other suitable shapes and sizes can also be used. For example, standard Almen strips, such as those used for measuring shot peen intensities described in SAE Standard J442, can be used. If desired, the material of the coupon 100 may be selected to be same as that of the components burnished, such as titanium blades used in aircraft engines. A process control apparatus 10, such as shown in the exemplary embodiments in
The process control coupon is then mounted on the selected process control apparatus. As described above, multiple coupons 100 can be used within the apparatus 10. For example,
A region on the process control coupon 100 is selected for burnishing. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
A burnishing operation is then performed on the selected region 301 using burnishing techniques known in the art, such as roller burnishing, deep roller burnishing (DRB), or low plasticity burnishing (LPB). In such a process, a burnishing tool, such as a roller 201 is pressed against the surface 121 of the process control coupon 100 to create a burnishing force “F” while traversing a selected path in a selected direction. Such a burnishing operation causes plastic deformation in the coupon 100 and creates a burnished patch 303 on the surface of the process control coupon. The burnishing operation creates residual stresses within the process control coupon near the burnished patch. The selected burnished patch 303 may cover the entire surface 121 of burnishing process control coupon 100 that is outside of the clamping plates 13 and 18, or it may cover only a part of the surface 121 as shown in
The burnishing operation is performed along selected paths on the selected region 301.
After the burnishing operation is completed, the clamping along the selected edges 101, 102, 103, 104 is released and the process control coupon 100 is removed from the apparatus 10. Post-burnishing measurements of selected physical parameters affected by the burnishing operation are then taken on the process control coupon. Examples of such parameters include deflections, cold work, X-ray diffraction, surface texture, etc.
One exemplary physical parameter that can be used for burnishing process control is the deflection of the process control coupon. As pointed out earlier, burnishing operation creates residual stresses within the process control coupon 100. When the clamping along the edges 101, 102, 103 and 104 is released, it allows certain deflections in the process control coupon 100. These deflections can be measured at selected points, such as for example, in the center of the burnishing patch 303 or the middle of an edge that was not clamped during burnishing. Other suitable points can be selected for measurements, depending on the size, shape and location of the burnishing patch 303 used.
In the context of burnishing process control, it is only necessary to determine that the physical parameter measured falls within certain established limits for the parameters. It is not necessary to establish the absolute values for these parameters. It is possible to use pre-calibrated gages to determine whether the specific physical parameter used (such as for example, deflections) fall within the pre-established limits. These limits for the physical parameters for the burnished process control coupons 100 are established based on known techniques to correlate with measured burnishing results on the components. Process control (or lack thereof) determination is made based on a quick measurement (in a production environment) of the selected physical parameter for the process control coupon, and pre-established correlations with the results for the burnished component.
The foregoing has described a method and related apparatus for process control of burnishing. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation, the invention being defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2393317 | Edwards, Jr. et al. | Jan 1946 | A |
3638464 | Winter et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3690140 | Shive | Sep 1972 | A |
3695091 | Smith | Oct 1972 | A |
3950642 | Feld | Apr 1976 | A |
4470292 | DeClark et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4974434 | Reccius et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5731509 | Thompson | Mar 1998 | A |
5771729 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5877405 | Champaigne | Mar 1999 | A |
6289713 | Champaigne | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6568239 | Champaigne | May 2003 | B1 |
6622570 | Prevey, III | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6959572 | Lawrence et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060254333 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |