Method and apparatus for producing methanol with hydrocarbon recycling

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10287224
  • Patent Number
    10,287,224
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 3, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 14, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus and method of producing methanol includes reacting a heated hydrocarbon-containing gas and an oxygen-containing gas in a reactor; to provide a product stream comprising methanol; and transferring heat from the product stream to the hydrocarbon-containing gas to heat the hydrocarbon containing gas. After removing methanol and CO2 from the product stream, unprocessed hydrocarbons are mixed with the hydrocarbon containing gas fro reprocessing through the reactor.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method of and an apparatus for producing methanol.


Methods and apparatuses for conversion of methane into methanol are known. It is known to carry out a vapor-phase conversion of methane into a synthesis gas (mixture of CO and H2) with its subsequent catalytic conversion into methanol as disclosed, for example, in Karavaev M. M., Leonov B. E., et al “Technology of Synthetic Methanol’”, Moscow, “Chemistry” 1984, pages 72-125. However, in order to realize this process it is necessary to provide a complicated equipment, to satisfy high requirements to purity of gas, to spend high quantities of energy for obtaining the synthesis gas and for its purification, and to have a significant number of intermittent stages from the process. Also, for medium and small enterprises with the capacity less than 2,000 tons/day it is not efficient.


Russian Patent No. 2,162,460 includes a source of hydrocarbon-containing gas, a compressor and a heater for compression and heating of gas, a source of oxygen-containing gas with a compressor. It further includes successively arranged reactors with alternating mixing and reaction zones and means to supply the hydrocarbon-containing gas into a first mixing zone of the reactor and the oxygen-containing zone into each mixing zone, a recuperative heat exchanger for cooling of the reaction, mixture through a wall by a stream of cold hydrocarbon-containing gas of the heated hydrocarbon-containing gas into a heater, a cooler-condenser, a partial condenser for separation of waste gasses and liquid products with a subsequent separation of methanol, a pipeline for supply of the waste gas into the initial hydrocarbon-containing gas, and a pipeline for supply of waste oxygen-containing products into the first mixing zone of the reactor.


In this apparatus, however, it is not possible to provide a fast withdrawal of heat of the highly exothermic reaction of oxidation of the hydrocarbon-containing gas because of the inherent limitations of the heat exchanger. This leads to the necessity to reduce the quantity of supplied hydrocarbon-containing gas and, further, it reduces the degree of conversion of the hydrocarbon-containing gas. Moreover, even with the use of oxygen as an oxidizer, it is not possible to provide an efficient recirculation of the hydrocarbon-containing gas due to fast increase of concentration of carbon oxides in it. A significant part of the supplied oxygen is wasted for oxidation of CO into CO2, which additionally reduces the degree of conversion of the initial hydrocarbon-containing gas and provides a further overheating of the reaction mixture. The apparatus also requires burning of an additional quantity of the initial hydrocarbon-containing gas in order to provide a stage of rectification of liquid products with vapor. Since it is necessary to cool the gas-liquid mixture after each reactor for separation of liquid products and subsequent heating before a next reactor, the apparatus is substantially complicated, the number of units is increased, and additional energy is wasted.


A further method and apparatus for producing methanol is disclosed in the patent document RU 2,200,731, in which compressed heated hydrocarbon-containing gas and compressed oxygen-containing gas are introduced into mixing zones of successively arranged reactors, and the reaction is performed with a controlled heat pick-up by cooling of the reaction mixture with water condensate so that steam is obtained, and a degree of cooling of the reaction mixture is regulated by parameters of escaping steam, which is used in liquid product rectification stage.


Other patent documents such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,196,188; 2,722,553; 4,152,407; 4,243,613; 4,530,826; 5,177,279; 5,959,168 and International Publication WO 96/06901 disclose further solutions for transformation of hydrocarbons.


It is believed that the existing methods and apparatus for producing methanol can be further improved.


SUMMARY

It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide a method of and an apparatus for producing methanol, which is a further improvement of the existing methods and apparatuses.


It is another feature of the present teachings to provide a method of and an apparatus for producing methanol which can be used with minimal processing of gas and gas-condensate deposits, and also at any gas consumer, such as power plants, gas distributing and gas reducing stations, chemical production facilities, etc., or small methane producers, (i.e., coal mines, oil production (flares), landfills, farms.)


In keeping with these objects and with others which will become apparent hereinafter, one feature of the present invention resides, briefly stated, in a method of producing methanol, which includes the steps of supplying into a reactor a hydrocarbon-containing gas stream, supplying into the reactor an oxygen containing gas; carrying out in the reactor an oxidation of the hydrocarbon-containing gas by oxygen of said oxygen-containing gas; and, after removing impurities and products of the reaction, recycling un-reacted hydrocarbon gas into the hydrocarbon-containing gas stream for further reaction.


Another feature of the present teachings is an apparatus for producing methanol, which has a reactor for receiving and reacting a hydrocarbon-containing gas stream with an oxygen-containing gas, to carry out in the reactor oxidation of the heated hydrocarbon-containing gas by oxygen of said oxygen-containing gas. The apparatus also has a means for supplying into the reactor a cold hydrocarbon-containing gas to be mixed directly with a mixture of said heated hydrocarbon containing gas and said oxygen containing gas at a later stage of the reaction to inhibit the decomposition of formaldehyde. Un-reacted hydrocarbon gas is then processed to remove products and contaminants before being recycled back into the hydrocarbon-containing gas stream.


As can be seen, in accordance with the present teachings, a heated hydrocarbon-containing gas stream and oxygen-containing gas are supplied into a reaction zone or into a reactor, where a gas phase oxidation of the hydrocarbon-containing gas is performed at elevated temperature and pressure in the reaction zone. The reaction mixture is cooled before and is separated into waste gas and liquid product. The waste gas is scrubbed to remove CO2 and returned to the heated hydrocarbon-containing gas stream. Cold hydrocarbon-containing gas is supplied into a regulation zone of the reactor to reduce the reaction temperature for example by 30-90° C. and thereby to provide a production and a redistribution of the ratio of products to produce corresponding quantities of methanol and formaldehyde.


In accordance with the present teachings, during cooling of the reaction mixture in the partial condenser, heat is transmitted to an input stream supplied into a formaldehyde rectification column for performing rectification of formaldehyde and simultaneous regeneration of the primary scrubber solvent, methanol. Within the partial condenser, dry gas is separated from raw liquids, including methanol, ethanol, and water. The raw liquids, through the flash drum, are supplied into a rectification column. The temperature of the top of the column is, between about 70 and about 75° C., the pressure in the column is, for example, up to 0.2 MPa. The final product is supplied to storage or further processing. The dry gas is scrubbed to remove CO2 and formaldehyde and is then returned to the reactor in the hydrocarbon input stream.


The time of presence of the reaction mixture in the reactor is about 1.2 sec. The period of induction takes approximately 70% of this time, and thereafter a significant temperature increase of the mixture takes place. The content of methanol in the reacted gas is about 40% due to its high stability and selectivity, while the content of the formaldehyde is about 4% due to its lower stability and selectivity. In order to increase the portion of formaldehyde to 8-13% in the final product, the temperature of the reaction is reduced by 30-90° C. after the period of induction (after the formaldehyde has been formed) at 0.7-1.4 sec of reaction due to the injection of the cold hydrocarbon-containing gas into the regulating zone.


When the temperature of reaction is changed from 370° C. to 450° C., the content of aldehydes is increased from 5% to 13% and the content of organic acids is increased from 0.5% to 0.7%. The selectivity which is close to a maximum with respect to liquid organic products, including methanol and formaldehyde, is maintained using a concentration of oxygen in the initial gas mixture 2-2.8%.


The novel features which are considered as characteristic for the present invention are set forth in particular in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, both as to its construction and its method of operation, together with additional objects and advantages thereof, will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A and 1B are views schematically showing a system of an apparatus for producing methanol in accordance with the present teachings;



FIGS. 2 and 3 are views illustrating concentrations of oxygen, formaldehyde and methanol during reactions in accordance with the prior art and in accordance with the present invention correspondingly; and



FIG. 4 represents a graph depicting the yield oxygenates of the system as a function of recycle ratio





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

An apparatus for producing methanol in accordance with the present invention has a reactor 100 which facilitates a gas phase oxidation of a hydrocarbon-containing gas are shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. FIG. 1B details the inputs and outputs of the reactor. The reactor 100 has a reaction zone 102 which is provided with a device 104 for introducing a heated hydrocarbon-containing gas stream and a device 105 for introducing an oxygen-containing gas. As explained in detail below, the oxygen-containing gas preferably has greater than 80% oxygen content to reduce the accumulation of inert gases due to the recycling process.


The reactor 100 further has a regulation zone 108 provided with an optional device 110 for introducing a cold hydrocarbon-containing gas stream for reducing the temperature of reaction during operation of the apparatus. In addition, the reactor 100 is provided with thermal pockets 112 for control and regulation of temperatures in corresponding zones, provided for example with thermocouples.


The apparatus has a device 114 for cooling the reaction mixture before separation. Additionally, the partial condenser 122 incorporates a gas-liquid heat exchanger to further reduce the temperature of the products. The condenser 122 separates H2O and alcohols from a hydrocarbon-CO2 mixture. The partial condenser 122 is preferably isobaric, as opposed to isothermal, to avoid pressure losses. The product stream enters, and liquid stream and gaseous stream exit the condenser 122.


Block 139 represents equipment which is configured to separate contaminants and products from a hydrocarbon-containing recycle gas component. In this regard, the equipment 139 is configured to remove CO2 from the reduced product stream. The equipment 139 can take the form of a purge valve, absorber, membrane separator, or an adsorber. It is envisioned the equipment 139 can be used to regulate the percentage of other non-reactive components such as N2 with, for example, a purge valve.


In the event the system is configured to recover formaldehyde, the gaseous reduced product stream leaves the isobaric condenser 122 and is passed to the scrubber 134. The scrubber 134 prevents the accumulation of CO2 and allows the physical capture of formaldehyde. The scrubber 134 can utilize a mixture of methanol and water to physically absorb formaldehyde and CO2 from the hydrocarbon gas recycle loop 135. The efficiency of the scrubber 134, which can operate adequately without refrigeration, is made possible due to the high operating pressure of the recycle loop 135. This is opposed to cryogenically low temperatures utilized by traditional absorption processes. Other potential methods which can be utilized use materials such as various amines known to remove CO2 and formaldehyde.


The gases enter the scrubber 134 as a “dirty” gas with some amount of formaldehyde and CO2 present. These components will only be present in relatively dilute amounts, so the duty of the methanol absorbent is also relatively small. To fulfill the minimum absorption requirements, modification of the flow rate of methanol or operating temperature of the scrubber column can be used. If it is desirable to operate at extremely low absorbent flow rates, then a lower temperature can be utilized, for example 0° C. If it is desirable to operate at ambient temperatures or temperatures achievable via cooling water, then a high flow rate can be utilized, for example, ten times that of the flow rate for 0° C. In either scenario, the pregnant methanol absorbent stream 14 is completely regenerated by the formaldehyde distillation column 138. Optionally, the stream 14 from the scrubber 134 can be passed through the condenser 122 to provide cooling of the product stream and preheating of the methanol recycle to improve the energy efficiency of the formaldehyde distillation column 138.


The reactor 100 is connected with a compressor 124 and heater 126 for supply of compressed and heated oxygen-containing gas. The raw hydrocarbon-containing gas is mixed with cleaned hydrocarbon gas from the scrubber 134 and is heated using a heater 136. In the event the raw hydrocarbons have a high CO2 content, the raw hydrocarbons can be mixed with the reduced product hydrocarbon stream from the condenser 122 prior to the entry of the scrubber 134 for removal of contaminant gases prior to entering the reactor.


The apparatus further has a unit for rectification of methanol which includes a flash drum 132, rectification column 128, and a vessel 130 from which methanol is supplied to storage or further processing. This rectification column 128 is used to separate methanol (light-key component) from ethanol (heavy-key component) and water (non-key component). As before, it is desirable for a portion of the heavy key to enter the distillate stream (as dictated by commercial specification for formalin). For methanol rectification, 99% or higher purity is typical and 99.999% is achievable with multiple columns. Stream 4 enters the column and the distillate, stream 5, and bottoms, stream 8, exit the column in liquid phase. Stream 8 has some amount of ethanol (and perhaps methanol, if ultra pure methanol was produced) and will be used as the basis of the aqueous makeup of the commercial formalin stream (stream 11). In this manner, some of the ethanol is recovered before the remainder is discarded in the liquid waste stream.


Disposed between the column 128 and the condenser 122 is a flash drum 132 for removal of CO.sub.2 and formaldehyde from the liquid product stream 3. The purpose of the flash drum 132 is to drop the pressure to an appropriate level before entry into the methanol rectification column 128 and to substantially remove any dissolved gases, typically CO.sub.2 and formaldehyde, from the liquid product stream.


In operation, the raw hydrocarbon-containing gas stream with a methane content for example up to 98% and the reduced hydrocarbon product stream are supplied from an installation for preparation of gas or any other source to the heater 136, in which it is heated to temperature 430-470° C. The heated hydrocarbon-containing gas is then supplied into the reaction zone 102 of the reactor 100. Compressed air with pressure, for example, of 7-8 MPa and with a ratio 80% to 100% and, preferably, 90% to 95% oxygen is supplied by the compressor 124 also into the reaction zone 102 of the reactor 100. Oxidation reaction takes place in the reaction zone 102 of the reactor 100. Between 2.0 and 3.0% O2 of the total volume of the reactants are reacted with the heated hydrocarbon-containing gas stream as previously described. To limit the amount of N2 within the system, for example to less than 30%-40%, or reduce the requisite size of the purge stream to achieve the same, the O2 stream is preferably substantially pure, thus limiting the amount of N2 entering the system. An optional second stream of cold or in other words a lower temperature hydrocarbon-containing gas than the gases in the reactor is supplied through the introducing device 108 into the regulation zone of the reactor 100. This stream is regulated by the regulating device 120, which can be formed as a known gas supply regulating device, regulating valve or the like. This cold stream can be composed of a raw hydrocarbon stream, a recycled stream, or a portion or combination of the two. The regulator is configured to adjust the volume or pressure of cold hydrocarbon-containing gas based on system parameters such as, but not limited to, pressure, temperature or reaction product percentages down stream in the system.


Depending on the intended mode of operation of the apparatus, in particular the intended production of methanol or methanol and formaldehyde, the reaction mixture is subjected to the reaction in the reactor without the introduction of the cold hydrocarbon-containing gas if it is desired to produce exclusively methanol. The introduction of the cold hydrocarbon containing gas is used when it is desired to produce methanol and formaldehyde. By introduction of the cold hydrocarbon-containing gas, the temperature of the reaction is reduced for example by 30-90° so as to preserve the content of formaldehyde into the separated mixture by reducing the decomposition of the formaldehyde to CO2.


The reaction mixture is supplied into the heat exchanger 114 for transfer of heat to the reactor input stream from the reaction mixture exiting the reactor, and after further cooling is supplied within partial condenser 122. Separation of the mixture into high and low volatility components, (dry gas and raw liquid, respectively) is performed in the partial condenser 122 which may absorb at least some of the formaldehyde into the raw liquid stream as desired. The dry gas is forwarded to a scrubber 134, while the raw liquids from the condenser 122 are supplied to the flash drum 132.


The scrubber 134 functions to remove the CO2 and formaldehyde from the dry gas stream. In this regard, the scrubber 134 uses both H2O and methanol at between 7-8 MPa pressure and between about 0° C. and about 50° C. to absorb CO2 and formaldehyde. Once the CO2 and formaldehyde are removed, the reduced stream of hydrocarbon gas is recycled by mixing the reduced stream with the raw hydrocarbon-containing gas stream either before or within the reactor, as desired. The raw hydrocarbon and reduced streams, individually or in combination, are then inputted into the reaction chamber 100 at input 104 or input 110 after being heated by heat exchanger 116 and heater 136 as previously described.


The rectification column is used to separate carbon dioxide (non-key component) and formaldehyde (light-key component) from methanol (heavy-key component) and water (non-key components). The pregnant methanol steam, stream 14, enters the rectification column and is separated into a formaldehyde distillate, stream 16, and a bottoms stream, stream 15. Some amount of methanol in the distillate stream is desirable since methanol is used as a stabilizer for the production of commercial grade formalin (6-15% alcohol stabilizer, 37% formaldehyde, and the balance being water). By allowing a portion of the heavy key into the distillate stream the separation is more easily achieved; furthermore, process losses typically experienced during absorbent regeneration are subsequently nullified as methanol within the distillate is used for formalin production. Stream 15 is supplemented by stream 31 so as to replace any methanol which was transferred to the distillate stream, stream 16. Combining stream 31 and stream 15 results in stream 17, which then returns to the scrubber 134 as regenerated methanol absorbent. Meanwhile, the formaldehyde distillate, stream 16, combines with the vapors from flash drum 132, stream 7, to form a mixture of formaldehyde, methanol, and carbon dioxide.


The formaldehyde, water, methanol and CO2 removed by scrubber 134 are passed to formaldehyde rectification column 138. Column 138 removes formaldehyde and CO2 from the methanol-water stream. Small amounts of methanol are combined with produced methanol and are inputted into the scrubber 134 to remove additional amounts of CO2 and formaldehyde from the reduced hydrocarbon stream.


Free or non-aqueous formaldehyde is allowed to remain in the gas phase by operation of the isobaric condenser 122. The liquid methanol product stream, or raw liquids, would then comprise methanol, ethanol, and water by allowing formaldehyde to remain in the gaseous stream. In this case, the liquid stream exiting the isobaric condenser 122 can bypass the formaldehyde rectification portion of the process and enter the methanol rectification column after having optionally passed through the flash drum 132.



FIGS. 2 and 3 show diagrams of the concentration of oxygen, formaldehyde and methanol in reactions without cooling and with cooling, respectively.


As can be seen from FIG. 2, approximately after 2 sec, oxygen is burnt completely. At this moment the reaction temperature reaches its maximum and methanol and formaldehyde are produced with their proportions in the reaction mixture. Methanol is a more stable product at the end of the reaction and its concentration remains substantially stable after reaching its maximum concentration. Formaldehyde is less stable, and therefore with a temperature increase (the temperature increases until oxygen is burnt completely) its concentration somewhat reduces.


In the reaction with the cooling shown in FIG. 3, via the introduction of cold gas when the formation of methanol and formaldehyde is completed, the temperature of a final period of the reaction is reduced so as to inhibit the decomposition of formaldehyde.



FIG. 4 represents a graph depicting the yield of oxygenates for the system as a function of the recycle ratio of the recycling hydrocarbon gasses. Shown is a graph depicting the use of Michigan Antrim gas having 97% CH4 and 1% N2. In this regard, the graph shows a significant increase in product yield using the same input stream and with little increase in capital costs. As the system efficiently manages pressure and integrates process energy usage, energy requirements are minimized, thus increasing the overall system economics.


It will be understood that each of the elements described above, or two or more together, may also find a useful application in other types, of methods and constructions differing from the types described above.


While the invention has been illustrated and described as embodied in the method of and apparatus for producing methanol, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention.


Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the gist of the present invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt it for various applications without omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly constitute essential characteristics of the generic or specific aspects of this invention. What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for producing methanol, comprising: a reactor having a reactor input;a first hydrocarbon-containing gas supply that provides a first hydrocarbon-containing gas into the reactor input as a first hydrocarbon-containing gas stream;a source of oxygen-containing gas that provides oxygen-containing gas into the reactor so that in said reactor a reaction of oxidation of heated hydrocarbon-containing gas with oxygen of the oxygen-containing gas takes place to produce a product stream comprising formaldehyde and methanol;an isobaric condenser that condenses a relatively low volatility component of the product stream for separation from a relatively high volatility component of the product stream, the isobaric condenser operating isobarically;a scrubber that receives the relatively high volatility component of the product stream from the isobaric condenser and removes a methanol-water stream that includes formaldehyde, water, methanol, and CO2;a rectification column that receives the methanol-water stream from the scrubber and removes a formaldehyde distillate stream including formaldehyde and CO2;a flash drum that receives the relatively low volatility component of the product stream from the isobaric condenser; anda methanol rectifier that receives a liquid stream from the flash drum and separates methanol from ethanol,wherein the first hydrocarbon-containing gas stream comprises a portion of the product stream.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising a second hydrocarbon-containing gas supply providing a cold hydrocarbon-containing gas downstream of the first hydrocarbon-containing gas to be directly mixed with a mixture of a hydrocarbon-containing gas and the oxygen-containing gas to produce the product stream comprising formaldehyde and methanol; and a heat exchanger for transferring heat from the product stream to the hydrocarbon-containing gas supplied by the first hydrocarbon-containing gas supply.
  • 3. The apparatus as defined in claim 2 and further comprising a heater disposed between the heat exchanger and the reactor input for further preheating the hydrocarbon-containing gas prior to its supplying into the reactor.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the heat exchanger comprises a downstream portion of the reactor.
  • 5. The apparatus as in claim 2, wherein said second hydrocarbon-containing gas supply is arranged at a location of said reactor where formation of methanol and formaldehyde is substantially completed.
  • 6. The apparatus as in claim 2 wherein a controller adjusts the second hydrocarbon-containing gas supply based on one or more operating parameters.
  • 7. The apparatus as in claim 6 wherein the one or more operating parameters comprise temperature.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising a formalin blender that receives a combined stream comprising the formaldehyde distillate stream from the rectification column and a vapor stream from the flash drum, the combined stream including formaldehyde, methanol, and carbon dioxide.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a division of U.S. Ser. No. 11/351,532, filed Feb. 10, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,642,293, issued Jan. 5, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/319,093, filed Dec. 27, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,202,916, issued Jun. 19, 2012. The disclosures of the above applications are hereby incorporated in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (141)
Number Name Date Kind
1038547 Fernekes Sep 1912 A
1500080 Kloppenburg Jul 1924 A
1776771 Boomer Sep 1930 A
1858822 Frolich May 1932 A
1976790 Lewis et al. Oct 1934 A
2007116 Walker Jul 1935 A
2196188 Bone et al. Apr 1940 A
2244241 Bryce Jun 1941 A
2384028 Hall Sep 1945 A
2467993 Rossman Apr 1949 A
2722553 Mullen Nov 1955 A
2922809 Oberdorfer, Jr. Jan 1960 A
3027411 Murphy Mar 1962 A
3064029 White Nov 1962 A
3130026 Becker Apr 1964 A
3145220 Bartok Aug 1964 A
3232991 Magee Feb 1966 A
3483229 Bernard Dec 1969 A
3689575 Tarhan Sep 1972 A
3718006 Ranke Feb 1973 A
3848424 Rhea Nov 1974 A
3920717 Marion Nov 1975 A
3940428 Connell et al. Feb 1976 A
3975172 Ranke Aug 1976 A
3977203 Hinton et al. Aug 1976 A
3993457 Cahn et al. Nov 1976 A
4067972 Oswald et al. Jan 1978 A
4144314 Doerges et al. Mar 1979 A
4149940 Pinto Apr 1979 A
4152407 Fuchs May 1979 A
4203915 Supp et al. May 1980 A
4243457 Mayumi et al. Jan 1981 A
4243613 Brockhaus et al. Jan 1981 A
4252548 Markbreiter et al. Feb 1981 A
4264566 Giles et al. Apr 1981 A
4271086 Supp et al. Jun 1981 A
4289709 Kaiser Sep 1981 A
4289710 Kaiser Sep 1981 A
4311671 Notman Jan 1982 A
4312955 Bartley Jan 1982 A
4324567 Ranke et al. Apr 1982 A
4346179 Sugier et al. Aug 1982 A
4353712 Marion et al. Oct 1982 A
4366260 Wainwright et al. Dec 1982 A
4374288 Scragg Feb 1983 A
4386941 Crouch et al. Jun 1983 A
4392869 Marion et al. Jul 1983 A
4394137 Marion et al. Jul 1983 A
4400180 Marion et al. Aug 1983 A
4430316 Ranke et al. Feb 1984 A
4443560 LeBlanc, Jr. et al. Apr 1984 A
4451274 O'Brien May 1984 A
4476250 Joyner et al. Oct 1984 A
4479810 Marion et al. Oct 1984 A
4490156 Marion et al. Dec 1984 A
4530826 Ohashi Jul 1985 A
4540712 Dombek Sep 1985 A
4564643 Shibata et al. Jan 1986 A
4575387 Larne et al. Mar 1986 A
4606741 Moreau et al. Aug 1986 A
4608447 Mazenec et al. Aug 1986 A
4609388 Adler et al. Sep 1986 A
4614749 Sapienza et al. Sep 1986 A
4618732 Gesser et al. Oct 1986 A
4619946 Sapienza et al. Oct 1986 A
4623668 Broecker et al. Nov 1986 A
4628065 Prouteau et al. Dec 1986 A
4628066 Bonnell et al. Dec 1986 A
4670473 Walker et al. Jun 1987 A
4721458 Conrad Jan 1988 A
4747858 Gottier May 1988 A
4760210 Sweeney Jul 1988 A
4782096 Banquy Nov 1988 A
4816121 Keefer Mar 1989 A
4822393 Markbreiter et al. Apr 1989 A
4861360 Apffel Aug 1989 A
4867211 Dodge et al. Sep 1989 A
4868221 Sie et al. Sep 1989 A
4873267 Sie et al. Oct 1989 A
4888361 Sie et al. Dec 1989 A
4982023 Han et al. Jan 1991 A
5012029 Han et al. Apr 1991 A
5015798 Han et al. May 1991 A
5063250 Murayama et al. Nov 1991 A
5067319 Moser Nov 1991 A
5067972 Hemmings et al. Nov 1991 A
5132472 Durante et al. Jul 1992 A
5177279 Harandi Jan 1993 A
5180570 Lee et al. Jan 1993 A
5220080 Lyons et al. Jun 1993 A
5384335 Tierney et al. Jan 1995 A
5427762 Steinberg et al. Jun 1995 A
5496859 Fong et al. Mar 1996 A
5631302 Konig et al. May 1997 A
5735936 Minkkinen et al. Apr 1998 A
5770630 Kowal et al. Jun 1998 A
5861441 Waycuilis Jan 1999 A
5883138 Hershkowitz et al. Mar 1999 A
5886056 Hershkowitz et al. Mar 1999 A
5959168 Aalast Sep 1999 A
5989503 Wiesheu et al. Nov 1999 A
6028119 Kokubu et al. Feb 2000 A
6102987 Gross et al. Aug 2000 A
6139605 Carnell et al. Oct 2000 A
6153149 Rabitz et al. Nov 2000 A
6159432 Mallinson et al. Dec 2000 A
6267912 Hershkowitz et al. Jul 2001 B1
6300380 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6328854 Sherman et al. Dec 2001 B1
6342091 Menzel et al. Jan 2002 B1
6447745 Feeley et al. Sep 2002 B1
6595291 Lia et al. Jul 2003 B1
6625988 Weisenstein et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632971 Brown et al. Oct 2003 B2
6645272 Lemaire et al. Nov 2003 B2
6667347 O'Rear et al. Dec 2003 B2
6720359 O'Rear et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726850 Reyes et al. Apr 2004 B1
6736955 Shaw May 2004 B2
6881389 Paulsen et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881758 Guillard et al. Apr 2005 B2
6942719 Stewart Sep 2005 B2
7028478 Prentice, III Apr 2006 B2
7067558 Grobys et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071238 Gamlin et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083662 Xu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7108838 McGee Sep 2006 B2
7578981 Pawlak et al. Aug 2009 B2
8202916 Pawlak et al. Jun 2012 B2
8293186 Pawlak et al. Oct 2012 B2
20010006615 Badano Jul 2001 A1
20020177741 Allison et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030032844 Seiki et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065042 Shaw Apr 2003 A1
20040065199 Rojey et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040123523 Rong et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040171701 Shaw Sep 2004 A1
20060035986 Bichkov et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060235088 Olah et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264683 Knox et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070196252 Pawlak et al. Aug 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
0 790 226 Dec 1996 EP
2 159 153 Nov 1985 GB
2196335 Apr 1988 GB
63001438 Jan 1988 JP
2003074372 Mar 2003 JP
2004 315413 Nov 2004 JP
2005330170 Dec 2005 JP
1 013 773 Apr 1983 RU
2 162 460 Jan 2001 RU
2 203 261 Apr 2002 RU
2 200 731 Mar 2003 RU
1 336 471 Sep 1996 SU
1 469 788 Nov 1996 SU
96 06901 Mar 1996 WO
03 031380 Apr 2003 WO
2009010407 Jan 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (36)
Entry
Liptak, Bela G. Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Fourth Edition. Process Control and Optimization, vol. 2. 2006. Chapter 8.12 Chiller Control, pp. 1720-1721.
“ASPECT Advanced Sustainable Processes by Engaging Catalytic Technologies—Call for Pre-proposals & Program Outline”, Sep. 16, 2003, pp. 1-14.
Marafee, A. et al., “An Experimental Study on the Oxidative Coupling of Methane in a Direct Current Corona Discharge Reactor over Sr/La2O3 Catalyst”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 36, No. 3, 1997, pp. 632-637.
Burch, et al., “Direct Conversion of Methane into Methanol”, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1989, 85(10), pp. 3561-3568.
Liu, C. et al., “Comparative Investigations on Plasma Catalytic Methane Conversion to Higher Hydrocarbons over Zeolites”, Applied Catalysis A: General 178, 1999, pp. 17-27.
Liu, C. et al., “Experimental Investigations on the Interaction Between Plasmas and Catalyst for Plasma Catalytic Methane Conversion (PCMC) over Zeolites”, Natural Gas Conversion V, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Col. 119, 1998, pp. 361-366.
Liu, C. et al., “Methane Conversion to Higher Hydrocarbons in a Corona Discharge Over Metal Oxide Catalysts with OH Groups”, 1997, Applied Catalysis A: General 164, pp. 21-33.
Liu, C. et al., “Modification of NaY Zeolite in a Corona Discharge and its Application for the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide”, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 1999, pp. 1103-1105.
Liu, C. et al., “Nonoxidative Methane Conversion to Acetylene over Zeolite in a Low Temperature Plasma”, Journal of Catalysis 179, 1998, pp. 326-334.
Liu, C. et al., “Oxidative Coupling of Methane with AC and DC Corona Discharges”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 35, No. 10, 1996, pp. 3295-3301.
Gordon, C.L. et al., “Selective Hydrogenation of Acetylene to Ethylene During the Conversion of Methane in a Catalytic DC Plasma Reactor”, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, vol. 36: Natural Gas Conversion VI, 2001, pp. 271-276.
Gordon, C.L. et al., “The Production of Hydrogen From Methane Using Tubular Plasma Reactors”, Advances in Hydrogen Energy, 2000, pp. 57-67.
Koert, D.N. et al., A flow reactor for the study of homogeneous gas-phase oxidation of hydrocarbons at pressure up to 20 atm (2MPa), Mar. 1992, 7 pgs.
Larkin, D.W. et al., “Carbon Pathways, Co2 Utilization, and in Situ Product Removal in Low Temperature Plasma Methane Conversion to Methanol”, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 1999, pp. 397-402.
Larkin, D.W. et al., “Oxygen Pathways and Carbon Dioxide Utilization in Methane Partial Oxidation in Ambient Temperature Electric Discharges”, Energy & Fuels 1998, 12, pp. 740-744.
Larkin, D.W. et al., “Product Selectivity Control and Organic Oxygenate Pathways From Partial Oxidation of Methane in a Silent Electric Discharge Reactor”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, pp. 5496-5506.
Larkin, D.W. et al., “Production of Organic Oxygenates in the Partial Oxidation of Methane in a Silent Electric Discharge Reactor”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, pp. 1594-1601.
Ranzi, E. et al., “A New Comprehensive Reaction Mechanism for Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels”, Prepared for the Twenty-Fifth International Symposium on Combustion Jul. 31-Aug. 5, 1994, Dec. 3, 1993, 23 pgs.
Sheverdenkin, E.V. et al., “Kinetics of Partial Oxidation of Alkanes at High Pressures; Oxidation of Ethane and Methane-Ethane Mixtures”, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical engineering, vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 311-315.
Foulds, G. et al., “Kinetics, Catalysis, and Reaction Engineering—Homogeneous Gas-Phase Oxidation of Methane Using Oxygen as Oxidant in an Annular Reactor”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, pp. 780-787.
Henni, et al., “Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Methyldiethanolamine + Methanol + Water”, Journal of Chemical Engineering Data, 1995, 40, pp, 493-495.
Supat, K. et al., “Combined Steam Reforming and Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas Under Electrical Discharge”, Ind. Engr. Chem. Res., 2003, 42, Page Est: 7.2 (A-H).
Supat, K. et al., “Synthesis Gas Production From Partial Oxidation of Methane with Air in AC Electric Gas Discharge”, Energy & Fuels, 2003, 17, pp. 474-481.
Thanyachotpaiboon, K. et al., “Conversion of Methane to Higher Hydrocarbons in AC Nonequilibrium Plasmas”, AIChE Journal, Oct. 1998, vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 2252-2257.
Lodeng, et al., “Experimental and Modeling Study of the Selective Homogeneous Gas Phase Oxidation of Methane to Methanol”, Industrial Engineering Chemical Res., 1995, pp. 1044-1059.
Kanniche, M. et al., “Technico-Economical Feasibility Study of CO2 Capture, Transportation and Geo-Sequestration: A Case Study for France, Part 1: Comparison of the CO2 Capture Options in IGCC System”, 5 pages.
Karaveav, M. M. et al., “Technology of Synthetic Methanol”, Moscow, Chemistry, 1984, pp. 72-125.
Bhatnagar, R. et al., “Methane Conversion in AC Electric Discharges at Ambient Conditions”, Plenum Publishing, NY 1995, pp. 249-264.
Caldwell, T.A. et al., “Partial Oxidation of Methane to Form Synthesis Gas in a Tubular AC Plasma Reactor”, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, vol. 36: Natural Gas Conversion VI, 2001, pp. 265-270.
Arutyunov, V., “Recent Results on Fast Flow Gas-Phase Partial Oxidation of Lower Alkanes”, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry 13 (2004), 13 pgs.
Vedeneev, V. et al, “Obtaining Methanol at the Stepped Oxidation of Natural Gas”, 2 pges.
Bak, V. V. et al., “Technical and Economic Factors of Methanol Production by the Method of Direct Natural Gas Oxidation”, 4 pages.
Basevich, V. Y. et al., “Cycle Regime of Gas Phase Oxidation Process of Methane to Methanol”, 8 pages.
Zang, et al., “Recent Progress in Direct Partial Oxidation of Methane to Methanol”, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, vol. 12, No. 2, 2003, pp. 81-89.
Non-final Office Action dated May 12, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,532, filed Feb. 10, 2006, 20 pgs.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,532, filed Feb. 10, 2006, 6 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100158760 A1 Jun 2010 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11351532 Feb 2006 US
Child 12630418 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11319093 Dec 2005 US
Child 11351532 US