Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for producing three-dimensional objects layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with a beam of charged particles.
Description of Related Art
Equipment for producing a three-dimensional object layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with electromagnetic radiation or an electron beam are known from e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 4,863,538, U.S. Pat. No. 5,647,931 and WO 2004/056511. Such equipment include for instance a supply of powder, means for applying a layer of powder on a work table, and means for directing the beam over the work table. The powder sinters or melts and solidifies as the beam moves or sweeps over a working area of the work table.
When melting or sintering a powder using a high-energy beam, it is important to avoid exceeding the vaporization temperature of the powder, since otherwise the powder will vaporize instead of forming the intended product. US 2005/0186538 discloses a method focusing on this problem. In this method a laser beam repeatedly is directed to the same powder target area during the melting/sintering phase as to step-wise raise the powder temperature. This way, a too high powder temperature is avoided.
When using an electron beam, or other charged particle beam, instead of a laser beam the situation is in some ways different. As the beam of charged particles interacts with the powdery material in a small area it causes heating of the irradiated area but also transfer of charges from the beam particles into the exposed area. The charges are transported out from the exposed area partly through the surrounding powdery material at a rate determined by the electrical conductivity of the powdery material and partly through secondary electron emission from the exposed area. Depending on the intensity of the charged particle beam, the electrical conductivity of the powdery material and the efficiency of secondary electron emission, the powdery material may, in some regions, reach an amount of charging high enough for the electrostatic force between the charged particles at the surface and underlying charged particles to overcome the force of gravity. Thus at this point charged powder particles will lift from and leave the working area and move around above the powder bed. This phenomenon propagates to surrounding areas of the powder layer resulting in a massive powder discharge or lift-off where large amounts of powder will whirl around above the powder bed and perhaps around the entire irradiation chamber. A result of a massive powder lift-off is that the powder particles that have left the working area interfere with the beam and that the structure of the powder layer is destroyed, When this happens, the production process must be interrupted in order to remove the spread-out powder and apply a new layer of powder onto the working table. These procedures take some time to complete and, in the interest of process stability and production rate, it is important to avoid such powder discharges.
Applying the method according to US 2005/0186538 to a powder melting/sintering device equipped with an electron beam is likely to give a poor result since no measures are taken in that method to avoid powder lift-off.
One solution to the problem of avoiding discharges is to add conductive material, such as carbon, to the powder as to increase the electrical conductivity of the powder. Disadvantages of this solution are, however, that the solidifying process of such a powder mixture may be difficult to control and that the properties of the formed product may he affected in a negative way. For instance, the mechanical strength may be decreased.
To lower the probability for powder lifting to occur it may be possible to increase the conductivity in the surrounding powder by performing a more thorough heating or sintering. However, such a procedure increases the time of building a three-dimensional body and because production time is an important parameter this approach is not fully satisfying,
There is thus still a need for improvements in the field of handling lift-off of powder from the work table.
The object of this invention is to provide a method and apparatus for producing three-dimensional objects using powder layers and a charged particle beam, which method and apparatus exhibit improved properties compared to conventional methods and apparatuses with regard to handling of powder lifting from the work table. This object is achieved by the method and apparatus defined by the technical features contained in the independent claims. The dependent claims contain advantageous embodiments, further developments and variants of the invention.
The invention concerns a method for producing three-dimensional objects layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with a beam of charged particles, which method comprises the following steps: successive application of powder layers to a working area, and fusing together successive layers of said three-dimensional object by successively irradiating the powdery layers with said beam. The inventive method is characterized in that it comprises the following steps: i) determining whether lifting of powdery material from the working area occurs using a powder-lifting detection device capable of generating a detection signal upon detection of lifting of powdery material from the working area, and ii) interrupting the irradiation of at least a part of the working area where powder lifting occurs using the detection signal generated by the powder-lifting detection device for automatically trigging the interruption.
Such a method has the advantageous effect of making it possible to automatically suppress the unwanted powder lifting effect at an early stage before it has led to harmful contamination or charge transfer into surrounding areas of the powder layer, which harmful contamination or charge transfer often leads to a major powder lift-off, complete discontinuation of the building of the three-dimensional part and the necessity to restart the building sequence from the start. An early suppression of the lifting effect makes it possible to restart the building of the three-dimensional object after the lifting effect has settled leading to a significant saving of building material and time for the completion of the three-dimensional object.
Since the inventive method makes the powder lifting phenomenon less harmful, a further advantage is that less time and effort needs to be spent on developing methods and material etc. for avoiding powder lift-off The inventive method can of course also be used in connection with various actions for avoiding powder lifting. In such a situation the inventive method works more as a safety system that is activated when the normal systems fail. The risk of powder lifting to occur is probably always present even if various precautions are taken.
In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the step of interrupting the irradiation of at least a part of the working area where powder lifting occurs is performed within a first time-period starting at a point of time when the detection signal is created, wherein the first time-period is less than 5 seconds. Preferably, the first time-period is less than 500 ms, more preferably less than 50 ms. Because it normally is an advantage to suppress the powder-lifting effect as quickly as possibly, it is normally an advantage if this first time-period is as short as possible. Suitable time-periods depend e.g. on sensitivity of detection device, type of powder, beam power etc. In some applications a few seconds may be sufficient. In other applications time-periods of one or two orders of magnitude lower than that should be used.
In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the step of interrupting the irradiation of at least a part of the working area where powder lifting occurs is performed by turning off the beam. This is a safe way of interrupting the powder lifting process.
In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the step of interrupting the irradiation of at least a part of the working area where powder lifting occurs is performed by guiding the beam into another direction. The beam can be guided outside the working area or towards other parts of the working area. In certain applications it is an advantage to avoid turning off and on the beam. It may also be useful to continue irradiating other parts of the working area, e.g. for heating purposes. If the beam is guided such as to irradiate other parts of the working area, the beam is preferably operated with a reduced average beam power for avoiding powder lifting but still keeping up the temperature of the powder such as to keep up the production speed. Reduced average beam power can be achieved with a pulsed beam or by reducing the beam power.
In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the method further comprises the step of re-starting the irradiation of the part of the working area where powder lifting has occurred. Preferably, the re-starting of the irradiation is carried out automatically after a certain, second time-period from the step of interrupting the irradiation. If the powder-lifting effect has been quickly interrupted it is likely that a new powder layer is not required and that the irradiation simply can be continued. This second time-period is in such a case preferably in the order of a few seconds. The second-time period may be set to be a function of the first time period.
In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the method further comprises the step of modifying certain operation parameters, such as heating parameters, before re-starting the irradiation. This way further powder lifting events can be avoided.
The invention also concerns an apparatus for producing three-dimensional objects layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with a beam of charged particles, said apparatus comprising means for successive application of powder layers to a work table, and a radiation gun for delivering said beam of charged particles. The inventive apparatus further comprises a powder-lifting detection device capable of generating a signal upon detection of lifting of powdery material from the working area. Such an apparatus makes it possible to rapidly and automatically detect powder-lifting events. Preferably, the apparatus is arranged to use the detection signal created by the powder-lifting detection device for automatically trigging interruption of the irradiation of at least a part of the working area where powder lifting occurs. Such an apparatus is suitable for being operated by the inventive method.
In an advantageous embodiment of the inventive apparatus the powder-lifting detection device comprises a detection unit that is capable of generating a primary signal that varies with varying amounts of powder particles present above or beside the working area. Thereby, the powder-lifting effect can be quantified.
In an advantageous embodiment of the inventive apparatus the powder-lifting detection device comprises a capacitor having two plates over which a voltage is applied, wherein the plate facing the working area is movable. Such a microphone type detection device has various advantages compared to other types of detectors. For instance, it is not affected by the electron beam and it is less costly.
In a preferred variant of this embodiment the apparatus is provided with a second powder-lifting detection device of the same type, wherein the second powder-lifting detection device is arranged to be insensitive to powder-lifting events, and wherein a difference signal from the two powder-lifting detection devices is used for generating the detection signal. This way true powder-lifting events can be distinguished from “false alarms” in the form of interferences, such as noise from the apparatus 1 and external knocks onto the chamber 2, which may create a detection signal if only one microphone detector is used.
In the description of the invention given below reference is made to the following figures, in which:
in contrast to a conventional apparatus, the inventive apparatus 1 further comprises a powder-lifting detection device 10 for detection of lifting of powdery material from the working area 5, i.e. for detection of powdery material that has left the working area 5 and that is present above and/or aside of the working area 5. The detection device 10 is positioned inside the chamber 2 at a side of the working area 5 and is electronically connected to a control unit 11 that in turn is electronically connected to the electron gun 3 for controlling purposes, such as for directing the beam 4 and for turning on and off the beam 4. The electronic connections are indicated with dashed lines 13. The powder-lifting detection device 10 is arranged in such a way that it is capable of generating an electronic signal S upon detection of lifting of powdery material from the working area 5.
As described above, during irradiation of the working area 5 part of the powdery material may reach an amount of charging high enough for making powder particles begin to lift from and leave the working area 5 and move around above and beside of the powder bed 7. The powder-lifting detection device 10 detects such an event and generates an electronic detection signal S. This signal is sent to the control unit 11 which controls the electron gun 3 in such a way that the irradiation of the working area 5, or at least of a part of working area 5 where powder lifting occurs, is interrupted. Thus the electronic signal S created by the powder-lifting detection device 10 is used for automatically trigging the interruption. This way it is possible to prevent the lifting phenomenon from propagating to surrounding parts of the working area 5 and thereby it is possible to prevent a massive powder lift-off. If the powder-lifting process is interrupted sufficiently quickly it is possible to continue the production process without having to apply a new layer of powder.
Interruption of the irradiation of a part of the working area 5 can be carried out by turning off the beam 4 or by directing the beam 4 towards another part of the working area 5 or towards an area outside of the working area 5. If the beam 4 is directed towards another part of the working area 5, the average power of the beam 4 is preferably reduced for some time in order to avoid a new powder-lifting event but at the same time keep up the heat of the powder. A reduced average beam power can be achieved by reducing the beam power and/or by pulsing the beam.
Irradiation of the part of the working area 5 subject to powder-lifting is continued automatically after a certain, second time period which in this example is 5 seconds.
The powder-lifting detection device 10 is arranged to detect a powder-lifting event at an early stage so that it can be suppressed at an early stage and so that the irradiation can be continued after the relatively short second time period.
As a safety measure, the powder-lifting detection device 10 is also arranged to quantify the powder-lifting event, i.e. to quantify the amounts of powder that has lifted from the working area 5. Thus the powder-lifting detection device 10 is for instance capable of determining whether a major powder discharge has occurred. If the powder discharge is determined to exceed a certain level, a second electronic signal S2 is generated for cancelling or delaying the automatic re-start of the irradiation. In such a case it may be necessary to apply a new layer of powder onto the working area 5.
In
In
In
In
In
All powder-lifting detection devices 10a-10e can be adapted to determine the amount of powder particles registered by the detector and not just to determine whether powder-lifting occurs, which means that the powder-lifting effect can be quantified. Thereby the powder-lifting detection devices 10a-10e become capable of generating the second electronic signal S2 mentioned above.
The response time of the detector 10, i.e. the time from detecting occurrence of lifting of powdery material until sending the signal S used for trigging interruption of the irradiation, is preferably as short as possible. The sensitivity and the positioning of the detector should be adjusted to the particular application.
All powder-lifting detection devices 10a-10e shown in
The microphone detection device 10a shown in
In a preferred variant of the invention the apparatus 1 is provided with a first and a second microphone detection device 10a of the type shown in
The invention is not limited by the embodiments described above but can be modified in various ways within the scope of the claims. For instance, the detection device 10 can be positioned in other places inside or outside the chamber or integrated in a wall of the chamber 2. In some applications it may be advantageous to use more than one detection device. Also other types of detection devices may be useful in order to apply the inventive method.
Although the various signals and connections described above are electronic it is of course possible also to use other types of means for communication, such as optical or other types of electromagnetic signals and connections.
This application is a divisional of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 12/810,602, filed Jun. 25, 2010, which is a national stage application, filed under 35 U.S.C. §371, of International Application No. PCT/SE2008/000007, filed Jan. 3, 2008, the contents of both of which as are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2264968 | De Forest | Dec 1941 | A |
2323715 | Kuehni | Jul 1943 | A |
3634644 | Ogden et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3838496 | Kelly | Oct 1974 | A |
3882477 | Mueller | May 1975 | A |
4314134 | Schumacher et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4348576 | Anderl et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4352565 | Rowe | Oct 1982 | A |
4401719 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4541055 | Wolfe et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4818562 | Arcella et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Sep 1989 | A |
4888490 | Bass | Dec 1989 | A |
4927992 | Whitlow et al. | May 1990 | A |
4958431 | Clark et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4988844 | Dietrich et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5118192 | Chen | Jun 1992 | A |
5135695 | Marcus | Aug 1992 | A |
5167989 | Dudek et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182170 | Marcus et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5204055 | Sachs et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5247560 | Hosokawa et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5393482 | Benda et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5483036 | Giedt et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5511103 | Hasegawa | Apr 1996 | A |
5595670 | Mombo-Caristan | Jan 1997 | A |
5647931 | Retallick et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5753274 | Wilkening et al. | May 1998 | A |
5837960 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5876550 | Feygin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904890 | Lohner et al. | May 1999 | A |
5932290 | Lombardi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6046426 | Jeantette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6162378 | Bedal et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6419203 | Dang | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6537052 | Adler | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554600 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6583379 | Meiners et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6676892 | Das et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6724001 | Pinckney et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6746506 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751516 | Richardson | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764636 | Allanic et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6811744 | Keicher et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815636 | Chung et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824714 | Türck et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7003864 | Dirscherl | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020539 | Kovacevic et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7165498 | Mackrill et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204684 | Ederer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7291002 | Russell et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7452500 | Uckelmann | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7537722 | Andersson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540738 | Larsson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7635825 | Larsson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686605 | Perret et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7696501 | Jones | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713454 | Larsson | May 2010 | B2 |
7754135 | Abe et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7799253 | Höchsmann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7871551 | Wallgren et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8021138 | Green | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8083513 | Escuder et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8187521 | Larsson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8308466 | Ackelid et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8992816 | Jonasson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9073265 | Snis | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9079248 | Ackelid | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9126167 | Ljungblad | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9310188 | Snis | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9505172 | Ljungblad | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9550207 | Ackelid | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20020104973 | Kerekes | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020152002 | Lindemann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020195747 | Hull | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043360 | Farnworth | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030133822 | Harryson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030205851 | Laschutza et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040012124 | Li et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040026807 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084814 | Boyd et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104499 | Keller | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148048 | Farnworth | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040173496 | Srinivasan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173946 | Pfeifer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204765 | Fenning et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217095 | Herzog | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050173380 | Carbone | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186538 | Uckelmann | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060108712 | Mattes | May 2006 | A1 |
20060145381 | Larsson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060147332 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157892 | Larsson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060180957 | Hopkinson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060284088 | Fukunaga et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070074659 | Wahlstrom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070175875 | Uckelmann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070179655 | Farnworth | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182289 | Kigawa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070298182 | Perret et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080236738 | Lo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090017219 | Paasche et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090152771 | Philippi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090206056 | Xu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100007062 | Larsson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100260410 | Taminger et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100310404 | Ackelid | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100316856 | Currie et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110061591 | Stecker | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114839 | Stecker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133367 | Weidinger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110240607 | Stecker et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110241575 | Caiafa et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110293770 | Ackelid et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110293771 | Oberhofer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309554 | Liska et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316178 | Uckelmann | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120100031 | Ljungblad | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120164322 | Teulet et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120183701 | Pilz et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193530 | Parker et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211155 | Wehning et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223059 | Ljungblad | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120225210 | Fruth | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120237745 | Dierkes et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120266815 | Brunermer | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130055568 | Dusel et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130162134 | Mattausch et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130186514 | Zhuang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130216959 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130264750 | Hofacker et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270750 | Green | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300286 | Ljungblad et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130343947 | Satzger et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140175708 | Echigo et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140271964 | Roberts, IV et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140301884 | Hellestam et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140308153 | Ljungblad | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314609 | Ljungblad et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314964 | Ackelid | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140348691 | Ljungblad et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140363327 | Holcomb | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140367367 | Wood et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004045 | Ljungblad | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150071809 | Nordkvist et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086409 | Hellestam | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088295 | Hellestam | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150139849 | Pialot, Jr. et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150165524 | Ljungblad et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165525 | Jonasson | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150174658 | Ljungblad | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150174695 | Elfstroem et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150251249 | Fager | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150283610 | Ljungblad et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150283613 | Backlund et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150290710 | Ackelid | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150306819 | Ljungblad | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160052056 | Fager | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160052079 | Ackelid | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054115 | Snis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054121 | Snis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054347 | Snis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160059314 | Ljungblad et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160129501 | Loewgren et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160167160 | Hellestam | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160167303 | Petelet | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160202042 | Snis | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202043 | Snis | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211116 | Lock | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160279735 | Hellestam | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160282848 | Hellestam | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160303687 | Ljungblad | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160307731 | Lock | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160311021 | Elfstroem et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170136541 | Fager | May 2017 | A1 |
20170136542 | Nordkvist et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170173691 | Jonasson | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170189964 | Backlund et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170227417 | Snis | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227418 | Snis | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2860188 | Jun 2006 | CA |
101607311 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101635210 | Jan 2010 | CN |
201693176 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101607311 | Sep 2011 | CN |
203509463 | Apr 2014 | CN |
19952998 | May 2001 | DE |
20305843 | Jul 2003 | DE |
10235434 | Feb 2004 | DE |
102005014483 | Oct 2006 | DE |
202008005417 | Aug 2008 | DE |
102007018601 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102007029052 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102008012064 | Sep 2009 | DE |
102010041284 | Mar 2012 | DE |
102011105045 | Jun 2012 | DE |
102013210242 | Dec 2014 | DE |
0289116 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0322257 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0688262 | Dec 1995 | EP |
1358994 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1418013 | May 2004 | EP |
1466718 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1486318 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1669143 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1683593 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1721725 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1752240 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1952932 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2011631 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2119530 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2281677 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2980380 | Mar 2013 | FR |
2003241394 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003245981 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2009006509 | Jan 2009 | JP |
WO 0181031 | Nov 2001 | SE |
524467 | Aug 2004 | SE |
WO 9308928 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9612607 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9737523 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 0181031 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0185386 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0208653 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2004007124 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043680 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004054743 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004056511 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004106041 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004108398 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2006091097 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006121374 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007112808 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007147221 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008013483 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008057844 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008074287 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008125497 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008147306 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009072935 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009084991 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2010095987 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010125371 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011008143 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011011818 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011030017 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011060312 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012102655 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013098050 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013098135 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013159811 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2013167194 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2013178825 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 2014071968 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014092651 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014095200 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014095208 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014195068 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2015032590 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015091813 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2015142492 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cheah, Chi-Mun, et al., “Automatic Algorithm for Generating Complex Polyhedral Scaffold Structure for Tissue Engineering”, Tissue Engineering, 2004, pp. 595-610, vol. 10, No. 3/4, XP002691483. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 16, 2012, for corresponding Application No. EP07 852 089.7. |
Guibas, Leonidas J., et al., “Randomized Incremental Construction of Delaunay and Voronoi Diagrams”, Algorithmica, Jun. 1992, pp. 381-413, vol. 7, Issue 1-6, Springer-Verlag, New York. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA), Second Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076025, dated Dec. 4, 2013, 4 pages European Patent Office, Germany. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076025, including Applicant's Sep. 10, 2013 Response to the ISA's May 17, 2013 Written Opinion and Applicant's Jan. 14, 2014 Response to the IPEA's Second Written Opinion, dated Apr. 4, 2014, 15 pages, European Patent Office, Germany. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/074383, including Applicant's Sep. 6, 2013 Reply to ISA's Feb. 27, 2013 Written Opinion, dated Jan. 20, 2014, 16 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2009 for Application PCT/SE2007/001084. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 2, 2008 for Application No. PCT/SE2007/001084. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 4, 2010 for Application No. PCT/SE2009/050901. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 17, 2008, of corresponding international Application No. PCT/SE2008/000007, filed Jan. 3, 2008. |
International Searching Authority (ISA), International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076025, dated May 17, 2013, 11 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/074383, dated Feb. 27, 2013, 10 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/SE2011/050093, dated Oct. 20, 2011, 5 pages, The Swedish Patent and Registration Office, Sweden. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/058733, dated Mar. 5, 2013, 4 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,081. |
Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,081. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,081, dated Jun. 21, 2012, 6 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/144,451, dated Sep. 25, 2012, 16 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/350,767, dated Nov. 24, 2014, 16 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,602, Sep. 11, 2014, 7 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,602, dated Sep. 10, 2012, 13 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,602, dated Dec. 20, 2012, 8 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,602, dated Feb. 2, 2015, 10 pages, USA. |
Weigel, TH. , et al., “Design and Preparation of Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering,” Expert Rev. Med. Devices, 2006, pp. 835-851, vol. 3, No. 6, XP002691485. |
Yang, et al., “The Design of Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering, Part II, Rapid Prototyping Techniques”, Tissue Engineering, 2002, pp. 1-11, vol. 8, No. 1, XP002691484. |
Gibson, D.W., et al., “Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing”, 2010, pp. 126-129, Spring, New York. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150151490 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12810602 | US | |
Child | 14618748 | US |