This application is a national stage application, filed under 35 U.S.C. §371, of International Application No. PCT/SE2009/050901, filed Jul. 15, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for producing three-dimensional objects layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with a high-energy beam.
2. Description of Related Art
Equipment for producing a three-dimensional object layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with electromagnetic radiation or an electron beam are known from e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,863,538, 5,647,931 and WO 2004/056511. Such equipment include for instance a supply of powder, means for applying a layer of powder onto a working area of a work table, and means for directing the beam over the working area. The powder sinters or melts and solidifies as the beam moves or sweeps over a working area.
For product quality reasons it is important that the applied layer of powder is evenly distributed over the working area and that the layer thickness is well-defined and corresponds to a predetermined value. Further, it is advantageous that the layer is quickly applied in order to keep the production rate as high as possible.
Traditionally, powder application means includes a feeding member and a distribution member where the former transfers a certain quantity of powder from the supply of powder to the distribution member, which in turn distributes the powder over the working area. WO 2006/121374 discloses another variant wherein a distribution rake is arranged to be moveable towards and a certain distance into the powder supply such as to work both as feeding member and distribution member.
For quality assurance reasons, and for making it possible to e.g. re-apply a layer of powder if the powder distribution is not correct, it would be desirable to determine the thickness and homogeneity of a layer of powder that has been applied onto the working area. However, how to do this in an easy and efficient way is not evident, irrespective of what type of powder application means that are used. Therefore, focus has generally been set on improving the reliability of the powder application systems.
An example of a system for monitoring the surface height/thickness of a layer in a selective deposition modelling (SDM) apparatus is disclosed in U.S. 2002/0104973. The system makes use of a light source, such as a laser, that directs a beam of light downwards towards the layer of non-solidified build material. A light detector, arranged at an angle in relation to the light source, detects scattered light from the surfaces of the non-solidified layer and the solidified layer below. The thickness of the non-solidified layer is then calculated by means of triangulation. The application described makes use of a liquid build material. Although the system disclosed may work well in certain situations it will not work properly when non-transparent build materials are used, such as metal powder. Further, the system requires additional equipment that is difficult and expensive to install in some types of apparatuses.
Thus, there is still a need for a system/method for checking the thickness and distribution of a layer of powder that has been applied onto the working area, in particular in cases where metal powder is used.
An object of this invention is to provide a method that exhibit improved properties with regard to layer thickness determination compared to conventional methods. This object is achieved by the method and corresponding apparatus defined by the technical features contained in independent claims 1 and 9. The dependent claims contain advantageous embodiments, further developments and variants of the invention.
The invention concerns a method for producing three-dimensional objects layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with a high-energy beam, said method comprising the steps of: applying a first layer of powdery material onto a working area; solidifying a part of said first layer by irradiating it with a high-energy beam; and applying a second layer of powdery material onto the first, partly solidified layer.
The inventive method is characterized in that it comprises the step of: determining a rate at which the temperature of the second layer increases after application onto the first layer.
Because a thicker layer placed on a hot surface heats up at a slower rate than a thinner layer, at least with regard to the layer surface temperature, it is possible to relate the temperature increase rate to layer thickness. Thus, the inventive method makes it possible to determine the layer thickness by determining the rate of the temperature change.
A powder layer applied onto the working area normally heats up relatively quickly due to a relatively quick heat transfer from the hot, partly solidified layer(s) positioned below. It is well known to use temperature sensing devices, such as thermographic (IR) cameras or pyrometers, for measuring the temperature of a surface of an applied powder layer. However, these measurements are normally carried out for the purpose of checking the temperature before solidification and relate to the point of time when the temperature curve has levelled off, i.e. when the temperature of the applied powder layer has reached and passed a maximum temperature. In contrast to such conventional measurements, the inventive method concerns the rate at which the temperature of the layer of powdery material increases before the temperature curve has levelled off.
The temperature increase rate can be expressed in several ways. Generally, the temperature in a certain position at the surface of the applied powder layer depends on the time lapsed since application of powder at that position. Further, the temperature increase rate, or derivative dT/dt, in a certain position will generally be decreasing with time and asymptotically approach zero (because the driving force, i.e. the temperature difference, decreases with time). One example of expressing the determined temperature increase rate is to say that it corresponds to the length of the time period from application of powder (in a certain position) to the point of time when the maximum temperature is reached (in the same position). Another example is to determine the actual temperature increase rate at a certain point of time. Still another example is to fit a mathematical function to measured data of the time dependency of the temperature and from this function fitting generate a parameter corresponding to the temperature increase rate. Irrespective of how the determined temperature increase rate is expressed, it can be related to layer thickness.
In an embodiment of the invention, the method comprises the step of: measuring a temperature in at least one position of said second layer using a temperature sensing device. This is a suitable way of obtaining data for carrying out the inventive method. Moreover, a temperature sensing device, such as a thermographic camera or a pyrometer, forms in many cases already part of the apparatus used for the type of production of three-dimensional objects discussed here.
Preferably, the step of measuring the temperature comprises the step of: performing a plurality of sequential temperature measurements in the same at least one position of said second layer, wherein said plurality of measurements are carried out before the second layer has reached a maximum temperature. This means that a data series is obtained of the temperature as a function of time over a time period during which the temperature of the second layer increases. Such a data series is very useful for determining the temperature increase rate.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the method comprises the step of: measuring a temperature in a plurality of positions of said second layer, wherein said plurality of positions are distributed over the second layer. Thereby, it becomes possible to determine the temperature increase rate over a larger part of the second layer, preferably the entire layer, which in turn makes it possible to determine whether the layer is evenly distributed.
In a further embodiment of the invention the temperature sensing device is a thermographic camera that, preferably, is directed towards an upper surface of the second layer.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the method comprises the step of: comparing the determined temperature increase rate with one or several reference values. Such a comparison can be used to determine whether the temperature increase rate, and thus the thickness of the powder layer, is within a certain acceptable interval. It can also be used to determine the actual layer thickness.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the method comprises the step of: fitting a mathematical function to data obtained from said plurality of sequential temperature measurements. This is an efficient way of handling the measured data and, further, the fitted function, i.e. the fitted parameters, are useful for determining the temperature increase rate. Preferably, the function used for fitting is the correct theoretical function for temperature equilibrium involving heat conduction from the underlying layer(s) and heat radiation from the second, upper layer.
The invention also concerns an apparatus for producing three-dimensional objects layer by layer using a powdery material which can be solidified by irradiating it with a high-energy beam, which apparatus is configured to operate according to the above method.
In the description of the invention given below reference is made to the following figure, in which:
The inventive apparatus 1 further comprises a temperature sensing device in the form of a digital thermographic camera 14 (sometimes also referred to as e.g. “IR camera”) positioned outside of the chamber 2 at a level above and at a side of the working area 5 and directed at an angle downwards towards the working area 5, i.e. towards an upper surface of an uppermost powder layer. A window 15 that is transparent to the relevant radiation wavelengths is positioned in a wall of the chamber 2 to allow the camera 14 to sense the temperature of the working area 5. The camera 14 is electronically connected to a control unit 11 that in turn is electronically connected for controlling purposes to e.g. the electron gun 3 and the equipment driving the powder distributing member 12. The electronic connections are indicated with dashed lines 13. To reduce the angle between the camera 14 and the working area 5, the camera 14 and the window 15 can instead be arranged on the upper side of the chamber 2, some distance at the side of the electron gun 3.
The signals from the thermographic camera 14 are processed and analyzed by the control unit 11. Thermographic cameras and processing/analysis of the signals generated by such cameras are well known and not described in detail here. It may be mentioned that signal processing may be carried out in the camera 14 itself or in auxiliary units connected to the camera 14 and/or to the control unit 11. It may also be mentioned that at least some of the prior art apparatuses of the type described here are equipped with a temperature sensing device, for instance a thermographic camera. However, the temperature sensing devices of prior art apparatuses has been used for another purpose.
When a new, second powder layer 8 has been applied onto a first and partly solidified powder layer that previously has been applied onto the working area 5, the thermographic camera 14 is in the inventive method used to determine a rate at which the temperature of the second layer 8 increases after application onto the first layer. This is used for checking the thickness and homogeneity of the second layer.
A preferred embodiment of the inventive method comprises the following steps:
The measurements in step A are carried out by the thermographic camera 14 which is controlled by the control unit 11. The camera 14 is directed towards the upper surface of the second layer 8 which means that it in principle can register a surface temperature of the second layer 8 (even if heat radiated from material positioned slightly below the surface also may reach the camera 14). The position and direction of the camera 14 implies also that the “positions” referred to in step A above in principle are two-dimensional area units in the lateral plane, i.e. a portion of the upper surface of the second layer 8. The size of each “position” can be varied and depends e.g. on the resolution (the number of pixels) of the camera 14, the distance between the camera 14 and the second layer 8, and the number of pixels used for each “position”.
The camera 14 is controlled such as to, for all positions, carry out a sequence of temperature measurements that are distributed over a time period during which the second layer 8 heats up as a result of heat conduction from the layer(s) below. After some time the (surface of the) second layer 8 reaches a maximum temperature T1 (see
The sequential temperature measurements should be initiated as soon as possible after application of powder because the temperature increase rate decreases with time and because the time to reach the maximum temperature is rather short, typically around 1 sec for the apparatus described above. Since the powder distributing member 12 moves from one side to the other over the working area 5 the point of time at which the powder layer 8 is applied onto the working area 5 varies depending on the position of the layer 8. Therefore, the sequential temperature measurements in a particular position of the second layer 8 should start as soon as possible after application of powder in that particular position. Preferably, a number of temperature measurements are carried out also at and after the second layer 8 has reached its maximum temperature.
The camera 14 registers data also when the powder distributing member 12 moves. This means that pixels “viewing” at positions just at the rear of the member 12 can be used to get measurement data shortly (within around 0.1 s) after powder application.
The plurality of sequential temperature measurements carried out in each position before the second layer 8 has reached the maximum temperature T1 includes at least two temperature measurements. From these two data points it can be possible to estimate the temperature increase rate, in particular if at least one further data point at and/or after the second layer 8 has reached its maximum temperature also is obtained. However, since the temperature increase rate is not linear it is recommended to perform at least three temperature measurements before the second layer 8 has reached the maximum temperature T1. In principle, the higher the number of data points (i.e. temperature measurements), the better the function fit. A measurement frequency of around 10 Hz, i.e. one measurement each 0.1 s, has shown to work well.
Fitting of mathematical functions to data points is well known to the person skilled in the art. Although a standard parameter fit (y=a0+a1x+a2x2+. . . +anxn) probably could be used in the present case, the fit is preferably made by using an adequate theoretical function for temperature equilibrium involving heat conduction from the underlying layer(s) and heat radiation from the second, upper layer. Such a theoretical function can for instance comprise the following parameters: layer thickness, material properties of the powdery material and powder particle size distribution. An advantage of using an adequate theoretical function is that the resulting layer thickness is derived from relevant physical relationships.
The expression “fitting of a (mathematical) function” is considered to cover also the situation where only two data points are available (in which case a line or curve is “fitted” to two points).
An analysis of the measurement data obtained in step A is made for all positions distributed over the second layer 8. With a proper distribution of the positions, this provides information on the temperature increase rate over the entire layer 8.
In the step following the fitting of functions it is determined a temperature increase rate for each of said positions. This step may be regarded as a part of the fitting-step. Typically, a parameter is determined in the fitting-step, which parameter represents the temperature increase rate. This rate is in turn directly related to the thickness of the second powder layer 8.
Storing of the determined temperature increase rates, e.g. in a memory connected to the control unit 11, is useful not only for making the data available for calculations and comparisons but also for quality assurance reasons. For instance, if an object produced by the inventive method breaks in a certain way during use it may be helpful to go back to production data and find out whether the thickness and/or homogeneity of the powder layers have been correct. It may also be possible to scrap such produced objects after manufacturing where the layer thickness measurements do not fulfil predetermined quality values.
In the following step each of the determined temperature increase rates is compared with one or several reference values. In case any of the determined rates (or another parameter related in a known way to a corresponding rate) is lower than or higher than a set value, this step is followed by the step of reapplying a layer of powdery material onto the working area 5. This means that if the second layer for instance is not sufficiently homogenously distributed over the working area 5, the powder distribution member 12 will complement it with another layer of powdery material.
Data points 20 in
In the schematic example shown in
In similarity with
By comparing
Each individual temperature measurement 20, 30, i.e. each “sampling” of the temperature, is preferably carried out during such a short period of time that the temperature variation during this period of time is negligible.
The temperature sensing devices of prior art apparatuses has generally been used for checking the temperature before solidification and relate to the point of time when the temperature curve has levelled off, i.e. when the temperature of the applied powder layer has reached and passed a maximum temperature. Such a prior art temperature measurement corresponds to one point at the far right of the temperature curves shown in
A thermographic camera, sometimes called infrared (IR) camera or thermal camera, is commonly regarded as a device that can form an image using infrared radiation, similar to a common camera that forms an image using visible light. A digital thermographic camera can be regarded as a temperature sensing device wherein each pixel forms an individual temperature sensing unit. The temperature measurements, i.e. the data points 20, 30 in
The invention is not limited by the embodiments described above but can be modified in various ways within the scope of the claims. For instance, a pyrometer can be used instead of, or as a complement to, the thermographic camera 14. However, a camera of the described type is advantageous in that it allows determination of the temperature increase rate in several positions of the layer which in turn makes it possible to determine the homogeneity of the layer (i.e. the vertical uniformity of the powder layer).
Moreover, the high energy beam can be a laser beam generated by a laser source instead of the exemplified electron beam. Further, the powdery material does not necessarily have to be made of metal but can be of e.g. plastics or a composite material.
If the point of time is known at which powder is applied in a certain position onto the working area 5, it can be sufficient to carry out only one temperature measurement at that position (before the maximum temperature is reached) to determine, or at least estimate, the temperature increase rate. This point of time of powder application may be possible to obtain from information via the control unit 11 on the position of the powder distribution member 12 or from optical information. However, determining the exact point of time for powder application may be complicated and, further, using only one single temperature measurement for determining the temperature increase rate introduces a significant uncertainty in the result obtained. By performing a plurality of sequential temperature measurements that “follows” the temperature curve it is not necessary to establish the point of time for powder application; if desired this can be calculated using the fitted function.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2009/050901 | 7/15/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/3/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/008143 | 1/20/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2264968 | De Forest | Dec 1941 | A |
2323715 | Kuehni | Jul 1943 | A |
3882477 | Mueller | May 1975 | A |
4348576 | Anderl et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4401719 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4818562 | Arcella et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Sep 1989 | A |
4927992 | Whitlow et al. | May 1990 | A |
5182170 | Marcus et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5483036 | Giedt et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5647931 | Retallick et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5753274 | Wilkening et al. | May 1998 | A |
5837960 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5876550 | Feygin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904890 | Lohner et al. | May 1999 | A |
5932290 | Lombardi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6046426 | Jeantette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6162378 | Bedal et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6419203 | Dang | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6554600 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6583379 | Meiners et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6751516 | Richardson | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764636 | Allanic et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6811744 | Keicher et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815636 | Chung et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824714 | Türck et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7003864 | Dirscherl | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020539 | Kovacevic et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7165498 | Mackrill et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204684 | Ederer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7291002 | Russell et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7540738 | Larsson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7635825 | Larsson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686605 | Perret et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7696501 | Jones | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713454 | Larsson | May 2010 | B2 |
7799253 | Höchsmann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7871551 | Wallgren et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8021138 | Green | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8083513 | Montero-Escuder et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8308466 | Ackelid et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8992816 | Jonasson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9073265 | Snis | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9079248 | Ackelid | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9126167 | Ljungblad | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9310188 | Snis | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20020104973 | Kerekes | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030133822 | Harryson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040084814 | Boyd et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104499 | Keller | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040173496 | Srinivasan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173946 | Pfeifer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050186538 | Uckelmann | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060108712 | Mattes | May 2006 | A1 |
20060147332 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157892 | Larsson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060180957 | Hopkinson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060284088 | Fukunaga et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070175875 | Uckelmann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182289 | Kigawa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070298182 | Perret et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090017219 | Paasche et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090152771 | Philippi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100310404 | Ackelid | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110133367 | Weidinger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110309554 | Liska et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316178 | Uckelmann | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120223059 | Ackelid | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130300286 | Ljungblad et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140301884 | Hellestam et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140308153 | Ljungblad | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314609 | Ljungblad et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314964 | Ackelid | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140348691 | Ljungblad et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140367367 | Wood et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004045 | Ljungblad | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150071809 | Nordkvist et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086409 | Hellestam | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088295 | Hellestam | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150151490 | Jonasson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165524 | Ljungblad et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165525 | Jonasson | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150174658 | Ljungblad | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150174695 | Elfstroem et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150251249 | Fager | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150283610 | Ljungblad et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150283613 | Backlund et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150290710 | Ackelid | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150306819 | Ljungblad | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160052056 | Fager | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160052079 | Ackelid | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054115 | Snis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054121 | Snis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054347 | Snis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160059314 | Ljungblad et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101635210 | Jan 2010 | CN |
19952998 | May 2001 | DE |
20305843 | Jul 2003 | DE |
102005014483 | Oct 2006 | DE |
202008005417 | Aug 2008 | DE |
102007018601 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102008012064 | Sep 2009 | DE |
0 289 116 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0289116 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0322257 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0688262 | Dec 1995 | EP |
1418013 | May 2004 | EP |
1466718 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1683593 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1 721 725 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1952932 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2011631 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2119530 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2281677 | Feb 2011 | EP |
20033245981 | Sep 2003 | JP |
524467 | Aug 2004 | SE |
WO 9308928 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9612607 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9737523 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 0181031 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0185386 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0208653 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2004043680 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004054743 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004056511 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2006091097 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006121374 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007112808 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007147221 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008013483 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008057844 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008125497 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008147306 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009072935 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009084991 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009000360 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010095987 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2011008143 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011030017 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011060312 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012102655 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013098050 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013098135 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013159811 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2013167194 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014071968 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014095200 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014095208 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/144,451, mailed Sep. 25, 2012, 16 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,602, mailed Sep. 10, 2012, 13 pages, USA. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 16, 2012, for corresponding Application No. EP07 852 089.7. |
Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,081. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12,810,602, Dec. 20, 2012, 8 pages, USA. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 4, 2010 for application No. PCT/SE2009/050901. |
Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2011, U.S. Appl No. 12/745,081. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 17, 2008 for Application No. PCT/SE2008/000007. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 2, 2008 for Application No. PCT/SE2007/001084. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 27, 2009 for Application PCT/SE2007/001084. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,081, dated Jun. 21, 2012, 6 pages, USA. |
Cheah, Chi-Mun, et al., “Automatic Algorithm for Generating Complex Polygedral Scaffold Structure for Tissue Engineering”, Tissue Engineering, 2004, pp. 595-610, vol. 10, No. 3/4. XP002691483. |
Guibas, Leonidas J., et al., “Randomized Incremental Construction of Delaunay and Voronoi Diagrams”, Algorithmica, Jun. 1992, pp. 381-413, vol. 7, Issue 1-6, Springer-Verlag, New York. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA), Second Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076025, mailed Dec. 4, 2013, 4 pages European Patent Office, Germany. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076025, including Applicant's Sep. 10, 2013 Response to the ISA's May 17, 2013 Written Opinion and Applicant's Jan. 14, 2014 Response to the IPEA's Second Written Opinion, mailed Apr. 4, 2014, 15 pp., European Patent Office, Germany. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/074383, including Applicant's Sep. 6, 2013 Reply to ISA's Feb. 27, 2013 Written Opinion, mailed Jan. 20, 2014, 16 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
International Searching Authority (ISA), International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076025, mailed May 17, 2013, 11 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/074383, mailed Feb. 27, 2013, 10 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
Weigel, TH. , et al., “Design and Preparation of Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering,” Expert Rev. Med. Devices, 2006, pp. 835-851, vol. 3, No. 6, XP002691485. |
Yang, et al., “The Design of Scaffold for Use in Tissue Engineering, Part II, Rapid Prototyping Techniques”, Tissue Engineering, 2002, pp. 1-11, vol. 8, No. 1, XP002691484. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/SE2011/050093, mailed Oct. 20, 2011, 5 pages, The Swedish Patent and Registration Office, Sweden. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/810,602, Sep. 11, 2014, 7 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/350,767, Nov. 24, 2014, 16 pages, USA. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/058733, Mar. 5, 2013, 4 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120100031 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |