With the ever increasing demand for greater engine fuel economy without a loss in performance, there has been an increased use in computerized controls for fuel injection systems. Typical fuel injections systems do not utilize traditional carburetors and have substituted throttle bodies for the functions previously performed by carburetors.
The throttle body contains the throttle valve or throttle plate that is responsive to accelerator pedal movement. The throttle valve regulates the amount of air that gets introduced into the engine. The fuel injectors spray atomized fuel into the intake of each cylinder in response to an electrical signal from the engine control module (ECM), also known as an engine control unit (ECU). One of the factors for determining the amount of fuel injected is the position of the throttle valve determined by the throttle position sensor (TPS).
The TPS interacts with the ECU to communicate the position of the throttle plate and/or the shaft supporting the throttle plate. Replacing or repairing the throttle body can result in misalignment of the throttle plate and/or support shaft. This condition can also result from replacement of the ECU. This misalignment can result from a number of factors including, but not limited to, manufacturing tolerances, high idle settings, and/or large engine sizes.
When a vehicle has been running with an ill performing throttle body, it is possible that the ECU may have made intermittent adjustments over time. This can result from small particle or carbon build up. As a result of these events, the stored information may not reflect the manufacturer's preferred operating ranges for the throttle setting or the RPMs for a newly installed throttle body.
While there are known devices for electronically adjusting the throttle valve in the throttle body, they often do not consider the requirement of optimizing operations to the manufacturer's preferred operating ranges. Furthermore, the known devices are generally expensive and not readily available to the small shop mechanic or do-it-yourself (DIY) mechanic. Therefore, an improved device and method for establishing the throttle body position is desired.
The disclosed device is presented as a dongle that is mated to the vehicle through the onboard diagnostic port-II (OBD-II). The device provides the ability to achieving electronic accuracy while avoiding the expense of known electronic systems or the possible inaccuracies of manual attempts to make the adjustments.
A summary of the operation is as follows. Turn the ignition on without turning the engine on. Check that all accessories are off and insert the programming dongle. Wait for a solid green light and an audible beep. Turn the engine on at an idle. The throttle position values will be compared and a setting in range will be indicated by a solid green light and an audible beep indicating that the programming dongle can then be removed. The above sequence can be repeated a needed; however, the failure to achieve a reading in an acceptable range is a likely indicator that the repair or installation should be checked for the cause of the repeated failures.
The throttle body programmer will be described in more detail with reference to the drawings wherein the same or similar elements are identified with the same indicator.
All automotive vehicles built for sale in the United States after 1996 are required to be OBD-II compliant for the transmission of electronic information into and within the vehicle system. There are five OBD-II protocol types in use: J1850 PWM, J1850 VPW, ISO 9141-2, ISO 14230 KWP2000, and ISO 15765 CAN. Each protocol differs electrically and by communication format. Accordingly, a programming dongle must be compatible with the vehicle's specific protocol in order to communicate with the OBD-II in the vehicle.
The programming dongle 10 in
User interface 500 may include one or more of an LED 402 for providing a visual indication of the status of dongle 10 to a user, a speaker 403 to broadcast an audible signal when the programming dongle 10 is ready for user interaction, a screen 404 to provide user instructions or indicators, and one or more input mechanisms such as keys or buttons 405 for a user to interact with the dongle 10.
The power supply 600 is powered by a 5 Vdc voltage regulator and regulated to 5 Vdc to drive the microcontroller 400. Power is provided by the OBD-II connection to the vehicle. The microcontroller or processor 400 is responsible for operating based on vehicle identification and specifications to set the throttle plate position.
The powertrain control module (PCM) of the vehicle (not shown), manages the engine, transmission and other systems based on information it receives from various sensors around the vehicle. The PCM receives signals from sensors that measure air flow into the engine and out the exhaust, the coolant temperature, how much the accelerator pedal is depressed, the speed at which each wheel is turning and other parameters. The PCM makes dozens of decisions per second, such as how much fuel to inject into each cylinder, when to fire the spark plugs and when an automatic transmission should shift to a different gear to deliver the best performance for the current conditions. When this flow of information between the PCM and other onboard computers and sensors is uninterrupted and works properly, the result is smooth and efficient performance with the PCM seamlessly making necessary changes. When there is an interruption, such as repairing or replacing a throttle body, the vehicle may not respond appropriately when the accelerator is depressed.
To assure proper performance, the information regarding the position of the throttle body must be provided to the PCM. The PCM is provided the position of the throttle body through the throttle body programmer verifying when the throttle body is set according to the manufacturer's specification. An exemplary verification process is provided below for a General Motors vehicle after 2008.
Throttle Position is checked when the engine is operating at idle, the throttle position must be watched to determine if the test passes or fails depending on the minimum and maximum values. An example of the available data related to throttle position follows; however, some of Byte data available is not used. The exemplary information is contained in CAN which generates a request for throttle position data and checks the throttle position value against a set value for the vehicle.
Command Message:
The Engine Speed RPM message is CAN ID C9:
The Engine Speed RPM and Throttle Positions messages, in some vehicles, are in CAN ID 110, C9, or 3D1 CAN messages.
Using the throttle position CAN message, the processor 400 compares the bit for throttle position to check its validity, and compares it to the throttle position set value. The message data byte for the throttle position will be converted into a percentage value. For example, if B1=0×23, the throttle position is 13.7%. The engine speed RPM message is CAN ID which uses 16-bit data or two bytes. These bytes are converted by the processor 400 into the RPM value. The calculated RPM is the decimal value of 16 bit×0.25. For example, if the value is 0xAAD is 2733, then the RPM is calculated as 0.25×273+683.25 RPM.
An exemplary sequence for using the throttle body throttle plate programmer is set forth in
Once the engine control module (ECM) responses, the VIN number will be stored in memory 401 in communication with the microcontroller 400 of
At Step 3, shown in
The type of remedial action depends on what services were performed previously. If the throttle body was replaced, it may be the result of improper installation. If the throttle body was cleaned or repaired, it may be a result of that service or a need for a new throttle body.
A manufacturer's performance settings or standards for one or more vehicles will be loaded in memory 401 for the various checks in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5864297 | Sollestre et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5937065 | Simon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950597 | Kamio | Sep 1999 | A |
5983860 | Kitamura | Nov 1999 | A |
6225898 | Kamiya et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6377173 | Desai | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6899080 | Pursifull | May 2005 | B2 |
6941203 | Chen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7125238 | Reutter et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7315238 | Chambers et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
8466774 | Lopez et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8626331 | Marsh et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634951 | Freeman | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8682468 | Marsh et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8841987 | Stanfield et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8841988 | Summerford et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8880274 | Chenn | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8979446 | Freeman | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9384604 | Manoukis | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9792735 | Elliott | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20040122542 | Yang | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040230356 | Namaky | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050126270 | Shao | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177284 | Kugumiya et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050248436 | Hohmann et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060101311 | Lipscomb et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060208069 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070001805 | Utter et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070046425 | Booth | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073458 | Webster et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070296559 | Fehr | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080122594 | Brecht et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150685 | Desai et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080319665 | Berkobin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090150118 | Naima | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160607 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090276115 | Chen | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278656 | Lopez et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100205450 | Sarnacke et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100293081 | Liu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110035461 | Sodergren et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110084807 | Logan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110288954 | Bertosa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120330498 | Nagara et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130141212 | Pickering | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130146376 | Nam et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130204485 | Chen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130282229 | Wittliff, III et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140104771 | Colan | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150187147 | Tieman | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150310675 | Park | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160084657 | Schilling et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086390 | Berkobin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160171802 | Fountain | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20220012956 | Fiello | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009010919 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Advanced Diagnostics USA. (Sep. 6, 2013), World Leader in Transponder Key Programming-mvptcodesupport. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20130906051317/http://www.mvptcodesupport.com/, pp. 1-2. |
Product Literature, Keyless Remote Program, 2013. |
Garrido, “Ford PCM Programming: The Other Procedures,” May 1, 2011, Search Autoparts, http://www.searchautoparts.com/motorage/technicians/scope-scan-service-repair/ford-pcm-programming-other-procedures. |
Cardone Industries, “How to Reprogram a Ford PCM,”Jun. 26, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_3hQI0VivQ. |