1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for providing an adaptable security level in an electronic communication.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In electronic communications, it is often necessary to prevent an eavesdropper from intercepting message. It is also desirable to have an indication of the authenticity of a message, that is a verifiable identification of the sender. These goals are usually achieved through the use of cryptography. Private key cryptography requires sharing a secret key prior to initiating communications. Public key cryptography is generally preferred as it does not require such a shared secret key. Instead, each correspondent has a key pair including a private key and a public key. The public key may be provided by any convenient means, and does not need to be kept secret.
There are many variations in cryptographic algorithms, and various parameters that determine the precise implementation. In standards for wireless communications, it has been customary to set these parameters in advance for each frame type. However, this approach limits the flexibility of the parameters.
When one device is communicating with several other devices, it will often need to establish separate parameters for each communication.
It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the above disadvantages.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of communicating in a secure communication system, comprising the steps of assembling as message at a sender, then determining a security level, and including an indication of the security level in a header of the message. The message is then sent to a recipient.
These and other features of the preferred embodiments of the invention will become more apparent in the following detailed description in which reference is made to the appended drawings wherein:
Referring to
Each correspondent 12, 14 can include a processor 22, 24. Each processor may be coupled to a display and to user input devices, such as a keyboard, mouse, or other suitable devices. If the display is touch sensitive, then the display itself can be employed as the user input device. A computer readable storage medium is coupled to each processor 22, 24 for providing instructions to the processor 22, 24 to instruct and/or configure processor 22, 24 to perform steps or algorithms related to the operation of each correspondent 12, 14, as further explained below. The computer readable medium can include hardware and/or software such as, by way of example only, magnetic disks, magnetic tape, optically readable medium such as CD ROM's, and semi-conductor memory such as PCMCIA cards. In each case, the medium may take the form of a portable item such as a small disk, floppy diskette, cassette, or it may take the form of a relatively large or immobile item such as hard disk drive, solid state memory card, or RAM provided in a support system. It should be noted that the above listed example mediums can be used either alone or in combination.
In order to transfer data between the correspondents 12, 14, a packet stream 30 is assembled at one of the correspondents in accordance with a defined protocol. The packet stream 30 is shown schematically in
Included in each of the headers 34 are security control bits 33, that included a security mode bit 35 and integrity level bits 36,37.
In this embodiment, security bit mode 35 is used to indicate whether encryption is on or off. Security bits 36 and 37 together are used to indicate which of four integrity levels, such as 0, 32, 64, or 128 bit key size is utilised. The security mode bit may be used to indicate alternative modes of operation, such as, authentication and the number of bits may be increased to accommodate different combinations. It will be recognized that providing security bits in each frame 31 of the stream 30 allows the security level to be on a frame-by-frame basis rather than on the basis of a pair of correspondents, therefore providing greater flexibility in organizing communications.
In order to provide security, certain minimum security levels may be used. These levels should be decided upon among all of the correspondents through an agreed-upon rule. This rule may be either static or dynamic.
In operation, the correspondent 12 performs the steps shown in
Upon receiving the frame, the correspondent 14 performs the steps shown in
It will be recognized that providing security bits and an adjustable security level provides flexibility in protecting each frame of the communication. It is therefore possible for the sender to decide which frames should be encrypted but not authenticated. Since authentication typically increases the length of a message, this provides a savings in constrained environments when bandwidth is at a premium.
In a further embodiment, the correspondent 12 wishes to send the same message to multiple recipients 14 with varying minimum security requirements. In this case, the correspondent 12 chooses a security level high enough to meet all of the requirements. The correspondent 12 then proceeds as in
In another embodiment, a different number of security bits are used. The actual number of bits is not limited to any one value, but rather may be predetermined for any given application. The security bits should indicate the algorithm parameters. They may be used to determine the length of a key as 40 bits or 128 bits, the version of a key to be used, or any other parameters of the encryption system.
Although the invention has been described with reference to certain specific embodiments, various modifications thereof will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as outlined in the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/477,637, filed on Sep. 4, 2014, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/885,115, filed on Jul. 7, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,862,866, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/484,656 filed on Jul. 7, 2003. The entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5099517 | Gupta et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5301287 | Herrell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5450493 | Maher | Sep 1995 | A |
5638448 | Nguyen | Jun 1997 | A |
5689566 | Nguyen | Nov 1997 | A |
5832228 | Holden et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6044062 | Brownrigg | Mar 2000 | A |
6101543 | Alden et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108583 | Schneck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118775 | Kari et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6272632 | Carman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6510349 | Schneck et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6760768 | Holden et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782473 | Park | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792111 | Italia | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6865426 | Schneck et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6918034 | Sengodan et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928544 | Chu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7016948 | Yildiz | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023863 | Naudus et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7024609 | Wolfgang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031309 | Sautter | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036015 | Vanstone et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7107335 | Arcieri et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7143137 | Maufer et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7233948 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7302564 | Berlin | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7412726 | Viswanath | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7437548 | Alfieri | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7447313 | Van Rijnsoever | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467406 | Cox et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7526807 | Chao et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7600038 | Struik | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7657531 | Bisbee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660986 | Qiu et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7965843 | Maino et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8069483 | Matlock | Nov 2011 | B1 |
20010043577 | Barany et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020035635 | Holden et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020090086 | Van Rijnsoever | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020174352 | Dahl | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176433 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181493 | Bamba | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012163 | Cafarelli | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026255 | Poeluev et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035542 | Kim | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030119484 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030156586 | Lee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159036 | Walmsley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030226011 | Kuwano et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010691 | Nelson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028409 | Kim et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047324 | Diener | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062224 | Brownrigg | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040136527 | Struick | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139312 | Medvinsky | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040218683 | Batra | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040223615 | Dhawan | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255001 | Oh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015583 | Sarkkinen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050076197 | Struik | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050081032 | Struik | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086501 | Woo et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108746 | Futagami et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060050708 | Shapiro | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064736 | Ahuja et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075480 | Noehring | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112431 | Finn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140400 | Brown et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060210071 | Chandran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070058633 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086397 | Taylor | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070160059 | Poeluev et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070195788 | Vasamsetti et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255954 | Struik | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080177997 | Morais et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080307524 | Singh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090290635 | Kim | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319775 | Buer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110106956 | Luo | May 2011 | A1 |
20110209196 | Kennedy | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110264915 | Cam-Winget et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1320010 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1324541 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1326157 | Jul 2003 | EP |
0010304 | Feb 2000 | WO |
03036857 | May 2003 | WO |
2005083970 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kent, Stephen T. “Internet privacy enhanced mail.” Communications of the ACM 36.8 (1993): 48-60. |
Li, Renqi, and E. A. Unger. “Security issues with TCP/IP.” ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review 3.1 (1995): 6-13. |
LeMay, Michael D., and Jack SE Tan. “Comprehensive message control and assurance with the secure email transport protocol.” Electro/Information Technology Conference, 2004. EIT 2004. IEEE. IEEE, 2004. |
Cam-Winget et al. “Security Flaws in 802.11 Data Link Protocols” Communications of the ACM 46.5 (May 2003) pp. 35-39. |
Dierks, T. et al.; “The TLS Protocol”; RFC 2246; IETF; Jan. 1999; pp. 23, 28-30. |
Hura et al.; “Data and Computer Communications: Networking and Internetworking”; CRC Press, 2001; pp. 337, 450, 453, 467, 471, 483, 484, 485, 489, 491, 526, 599, 609, 617, 618, 621, 937, 1086, 1117, 1118, 1132. |
IEEE Standard 802.11; Standard for Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Networks—Specific Requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications; IEEE Press; 1999; pp. 34-41, 50-58. |
Kent, S. et al.; “IP Authentication Header”; RFC 2402; IETF; Nov. 1998; 21 pages. |
Kent, S. et al.; “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol”; RFC 2401; IETF; Nov. 1998; 62 pages. |
Oppliger; “Security at the Internet Layer” Computer 31.9 (1998) pp. 43-47. |
Specification of the Bluetooth System; Specification vol. 1—Core, Version 1.0B; Dec. 1, 1999; p. 160. |
Sung et al.; “Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Secure Protocol for E-Commerce”; Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks; Oct. 15-17, 2001; pp. 32-39. |
“Transmission Control Protocol”; RFC 0793; Darpa Internet Program; Information Sciences Institute; University of Southern California; Sep. 1981. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Mar. 25, 2008; 24 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Nov. 25, 2008; 30 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Dec. 9, 2009; 25 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Aug. 18, 2010; 27 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Jan. 27, 2011; 30 pages. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Feb. 21, 2012; 30 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Apr. 12, 2012; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,869 on Apr. 2, 2013; 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,869 on Sep. 27, 2013; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Jul. 13, 2010; 21 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Dec. 22, 2010; 14 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Feb. 17, 2012; 14 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Dec. 11, 2012; 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on May 24, 2013; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Nov. 25, 2013; 23 pages. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,434,992 on Sep. 14, 2011; 3 pages. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,434,992 on Dec. 5, 2012; 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in Canadian Application No. 2,434,992 on Dec. 9, 2013; 1 page. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,478,274 on Feb. 3, 2012; 2 pages. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,478,274 on Mar. 14, 2013; 3 pages. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,478,274 on Jan. 7, 2014; 2 pages. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,644,015 on May 23, 2012; 3 pages. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,644,015 on Nov. 4, 2013; 4 pages. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Jan. 14, 2004; 10 pages. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Mar. 21, 2012; 10 pages. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Aug. 13, 2012; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Dec. 17, 2012; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on May 6, 2013; 4 pages. |
Search Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Jan. 25, 2005; 4 pages. |
Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Oct. 31, 2005; 7 pages. |
Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Feb. 15, 2006; 2 pages. |
Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Aug. 23, 2006; 3 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0623685.5 on Mar. 16, 2007; 5 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0721922.3 on Dec. 18, 2007; 5 pages. |
Examination Report issued in German Application No. 102004040312.0 on Oct. 24, 2012; 15 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 07719535.2 on May 13, 2011; 6 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(4) EPC issued in European Application No. 07719535.2 on Feb. 17, 2012; 5 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(4) EPC issued in European Application No. 07719535.2 on Mar. 8, 2013; 5 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(4) EPC issued in European Application No. 07719535.2 on Feb. 7, 2014; 7 pages. |
Official Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2009-504535 on Aug. 17, 2011; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in Japanese Application No. 2009-504535 on Dec. 13, 2011; 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in Japanese Application No. 2011-251567 on Apr. 23, 2013; 3 pages. |
Office Action issued in Korean Application No. 10-2008-7027745 on Jun. 28, 2013; 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/CA2007/000608 on Aug. 28, 2007; 4 pages. |
SunScreen 3.2 Administrators Overview, Sep. 2001, pp. 1-356. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160028740 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60484656 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14477637 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14877072 | US | |
Parent | 10885115 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 14477637 | US |