Method and apparatus for providing an adaptable security level in an electronic communication

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9419983
  • Patent Number
    9,419,983
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 7, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 16, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A method of communicating in a secure communication system, comprises the steps of assembling a message at a sender, then determining a security level, and including an indication of the security level in a header of the message. The message is then sent to a recipient.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for providing an adaptable security level in an electronic communication.


2. Description of the Prior Art


In electronic communications, it is often necessary to prevent an eavesdropper from intercepting message. It is also desirable to have an indication of the authenticity of a message, that is a verifiable identification of the sender. These goals are usually achieved through the use of cryptography. Private key cryptography requires sharing a secret key prior to initiating communications. Public key cryptography is generally preferred as it does not require such a shared secret key. Instead, each correspondent has a key pair including a private key and a public key. The public key may be provided by any convenient means, and does not need to be kept secret.


There are many variations in cryptographic algorithms, and various parameters that determine the precise implementation. In standards for wireless communications, it has been customary to set these parameters in advance for each frame type. However, this approach limits the flexibility of the parameters.


When one device is communicating with several other devices, it will often need to establish separate parameters for each communication.


It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the above disadvantages.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of communicating in a secure communication system, comprising the steps of assembling as message at a sender, then determining a security level, and including an indication of the security level in a header of the message. The message is then sent to a recipient.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features of the preferred embodiments of the invention will become more apparent in the following detailed description in which reference is made to the appended drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a communication system;



FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of an information frame exchanged in the communication system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a frame control portion of the frame of FIG. 2;



FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a method performed by a sender in FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a method performed by a recipient in FIG. 1.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, a communication system 10 includes a pair of correspondents 12, 14 connected by a communication link 16. Each correspondent 12, 14 includes a respective cryptographic unit 18, 20.


Each correspondent 12, 14 can include a processor 22, 24. Each processor may be coupled to a display and to user input devices, such as a keyboard, mouse, or other suitable devices. If the display is touch sensitive, then the display itself can be employed as the user input device. A computer readable storage medium is coupled to each processor 22, 24 for providing instructions to the processor 22, 24 to instruct and/or configure processor 22, 24 to perform steps or algorithms related to the operation of each correspondent 12, 14, as further explained below. The computer readable medium can include hardware and/or software such as, by way of example only, magnetic disks, magnetic tape, optically readable medium such as CD ROM's, and semi-conductor memory such as PCMCIA cards. In each case, the medium may take the form of a portable item such as a small disk, floppy diskette, cassette, or it may take the form of a relatively large or immobile item such as hard disk drive, solid state memory card, or RAM provided in a support system. It should be noted that the above listed example mediums can be used either alone or in combination.


In order to transfer data between the correspondents 12, 14, a packet stream 30 is assembled at one of the correspondents in accordance with a defined protocol. The packet stream 30 is shown schematically in FIG. 2 and is composed of one or more frames 31, each of which has a header 32 and data 34. In some protocols, the packet may itself be organised as a frame with a header 32a and the data 34a consisting of a collection of individual frames. The header 32 is made up of a string of bits and contains control information at specified locations within the bit stream.


Included in each of the headers 34 are security control bits 33, that included a security mode bit 35 and integrity level bits 36,37.


In this embodiment, security bit mode 35 is used to indicate whether encryption is on or off. Security bits 36 and 37 together are used to indicate which of four integrity levels, such as 0, 32, 64, or 128 bit key size is utilised. The security mode bit may be used to indicate alternative modes of operation, such as, authentication and the number of bits may be increased to accommodate different combinations. It will be recognized that providing security bits in each frame 31 of the stream 30 allows the security level to be on a frame-by-frame basis rather than on the basis of a pair of correspondents, therefore providing greater flexibility in organizing communications.


In order to provide security, certain minimum security levels may be used. These levels should be decided upon among all of the correspondents through an agreed-upon rule. This rule may be either static or dynamic.


In operation, the correspondent 12 performs the steps shown in FIG. 4 by the numeral 100 to send information to the correspondent 14. First, the correspondent 12 prepares data and a header at step 102. Then it selects the security level at step 104. The security level is determined by considering the minimum security level required by the recipient, the nature of the recipient, and the kind of data being transmitted. If the security level includes encryption, then the correspondent 12 encrypts the data at step 106. If the security level includes authentication, then the correspondent 12 signs the data at step 108. Then the correspondent 12 includes bits indicating the security mode and security level in the frame control at step 110. The correspondent 12 then sends the frame to the correspondent 14.


Upon receiving the frame, the correspondent 14 performs the steps shown in FIG. 5 by the numeral 120. The correspondent 14 first receives the frame at step 122. It then extracts the security bits at step 124. If the mode security bits 34 indicate encryption, then the correspondent 14 decrypts the data at step 126. If the security bits indicate authentication, then the correspondent 14 verifies the signature at step 126. Finally, the correspondent 14 checks the security level to ensure it meets predetermined minimum requirements. If either the encryption or authentication fails, or if the security level does not meet the minimum requirements, then the correspondent 14 rejects the message.


It will be recognized that providing security bits and an adjustable security level provides flexibility in protecting each frame of the communication. It is therefore possible for the sender to decide which frames should be encrypted but not authenticated. Since authentication typically increases the length of a message, this provides a savings in constrained environments when bandwidth is at a premium.


In a further embodiment, the correspondent 12 wishes to send the same message to multiple recipients 14 with varying minimum security requirements. In this case, the correspondent 12 chooses a security level high enough to meet all of the requirements. The correspondent 12 then proceeds as in FIG. 4 to assemble and send a message with the security level. The message will be accepted by each recipient since it meets each of their minimum requirements. It will be recognized that this embodiment provides greater efficiency than separately dealing with each recipient's requirements.


In another embodiment, a different number of security bits are used. The actual number of bits is not limited to any one value, but rather may be predetermined for any given application. The security bits should indicate the algorithm parameters. They may be used to determine the length of a key as 40 bits or 128 bits, the version of a key to be used, or any other parameters of the encryption system.


Although the invention has been described with reference to certain specific embodiments, various modifications thereof will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as outlined in the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method performed by a communication device, the method comprising: said communication device receiving a plurality of frames, wherein each individual frame having a header and associated data, the header of each individual frame including security control bits that indicate for that individual frame whether encryption has been provided for the individual frame and whether integrity has been provided for the individual frame, wherein the security control bits include one or more security mode bits and integrity level bits, wherein the one or more security mode bits are used to indicate whether encryption is on or off, and wherein the integrity level bits indicate which of at least four integrity levels is utilized, the integrity levels corresponding to signing operations of a sender of increasing strength;on a frame-by-frame basis, for each individual frame, said communication device: identifying a security level for the individual frame based on the security control bits in the header of the frame;checking said security level against predetermined minimum security requirements for said communication device; andrejecting the individual frame in response to said security level not meeting said predetermined minimum security requirements.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said security level is selected by another device based on said predetermined security requirements for said communication device.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein said predetermined security requirements are determined among said communication device and said other device based on an agreed-upon rule.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said security control bits include an indication of a cryptographic algorithm parameter.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising decrypting each frame according to said security level for the frame.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising verifying the integrity of each frame according to said security level for the frame.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of integrity levels is four, and the four integrity levels correspond to key lengths of 0, 32, 64, and 128 bits.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein one of the integrity levels uses a key length of 128 bits.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein one of the integrity levels indicates no integrity security.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of integrity levels is at least four, and the at least four levels include four levels corresponding to key lengths of 0, 32, 64, and 128 bits.
  • 11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-executable instructions that are configured when executed, by data processing apparatus of a communication device, to perform operations comprising: receiving a plurality of frames, wherein each individual frame having a header and associated data, the header of each individual frame including security control bits that indicate for that individual frame whether encryption has been provided for the individual frame and whether integrity has been provided for the individual frame, wherein the security control bits include one or more security mode bits and integrity level bits, wherein the one or more security mode bits are used to indicate whether encryption is on or off, and wherein the integrity level bits indicate which of at least four integrity levels is utilized, the integrity levels corresponding to signing operations of a sender of increasing strength;on a frame-by-frame basis, for each individual frame: identifying a security level for the individual frame based on the security control bits in the header of the frame;checking said security level against predetermined minimum security requirements for said communication device; andrejecting the individual frame in response to said security level not meeting said predetermined minimum security requirements.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, wherein said security level is selected by another device based on said predetermined security requirements for said communication device.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, wherein said predetermined security requirements are determined among the communication device and another device based on an agreed-upon rule.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, wherein said security control bits include an indication of a cryptographic algorithm parameter.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, the operations further comprising decrypting each frame according to said security level for the frame.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, the operations further comprising verifying the integrity of each frame according to said security level for the frame.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, wherein the number of integrity levels is four, and the four integrity levels correspond to key lengths of 0, 32, 64, and 128 bits.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, wherein one of the integrity levels uses a key length of 128 bits.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, wherein one of the integrity levels indicates no integrity security.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 11, wherein the number of integrity levels is at least four, and the at least four levels include four levels corresponding to key lengths of 0, 32, 64, and 128 bits.
  • 21. A device, comprising: a memory; andone or more processors communicatively coupled with the memory and configured to: receive a plurality of frames, wherein each individual frame having a header and associated data, the header of each individual frame including security control bits that indicate for that individual frame whether encryption has been provided for the individual frame and whether integrity has been provided for the individual frame, wherein the security control bits include one or more security mode bits and integrity level bits, wherein the one or more security mode bits are used to indicate whether encryption is on or off, and wherein the integrity level bits indicate which of at least four integrity levels is utilized, the integrity levels corresponding to signing operations of a sender of increasing strength; andon a frame-by-frame basis, for each individual frame: identify a security level for the individual frame based on the security control bits in the header of the frame;check said security level against predetermined minimum security requirements for said communication device; andreject the individual frame in response to said security level not meeting said predetermined minimum security requirements.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/477,637, filed on Sep. 4, 2014, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/885,115, filed on Jul. 7, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,862,866, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/484,656 filed on Jul. 7, 2003. The entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (82)
Number Name Date Kind
5099517 Gupta et al. Mar 1992 A
5301287 Herrell et al. Apr 1994 A
5450493 Maher Sep 1995 A
5638448 Nguyen Jun 1997 A
5689566 Nguyen Nov 1997 A
5832228 Holden et al. Nov 1998 A
6044062 Brownrigg Mar 2000 A
6101543 Alden et al. Aug 2000 A
6108583 Schneck et al. Aug 2000 A
6118775 Kari et al. Sep 2000 A
6272632 Carman et al. Aug 2001 B1
6510349 Schneck et al. Jan 2003 B1
6760768 Holden et al. Jul 2004 B2
6782473 Park Aug 2004 B1
6792111 Italia Sep 2004 B1
6865426 Schneck et al. Mar 2005 B1
6918034 Sengodan et al. Jul 2005 B1
6928544 Chu Aug 2005 B2
7016948 Yildiz Mar 2006 B1
7023863 Naudus et al. Apr 2006 B1
7024609 Wolfgang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031309 Sautter Apr 2006 B1
7036015 Vanstone et al. Apr 2006 B2
7107335 Arcieri et al. Sep 2006 B1
7143137 Maufer et al. Nov 2006 B2
7233948 Shamoon et al. Jun 2007 B1
7302564 Berlin Nov 2007 B2
7412726 Viswanath Aug 2008 B1
7437548 Alfieri Oct 2008 B1
7447313 Van Rijnsoever Nov 2008 B2
7467406 Cox et al. Dec 2008 B2
7526807 Chao et al. Apr 2009 B2
7600038 Struik Oct 2009 B2
7657531 Bisbee et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660986 Qiu et al. Feb 2010 B1
7965843 Maino et al. Jun 2011 B1
8069483 Matlock Nov 2011 B1
20010043577 Barany et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020035635 Holden et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020090086 Van Rijnsoever Jul 2002 A1
20020174352 Dahl Nov 2002 A1
20020176433 Zhu et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020181493 Bamba Dec 2002 A1
20030012163 Cafarelli Jan 2003 A1
20030026255 Poeluev et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030035542 Kim Feb 2003 A1
20030119484 Adachi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030156586 Lee Aug 2003 A1
20030159036 Walmsley et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030226011 Kuwano et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010691 Nelson Jan 2004 A1
20040028409 Kim et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040047324 Diener Mar 2004 A1
20040062224 Brownrigg Apr 2004 A1
20040136527 Struick Jul 2004 A1
20040139312 Medvinsky Jul 2004 A1
20040218683 Batra Nov 2004 A1
20040223615 Dhawan Nov 2004 A1
20040255001 Oh et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050015583 Sarkkinen et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050076197 Struik Apr 2005 A1
20050081032 Struik Apr 2005 A1
20050086501 Woo et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050108746 Futagami et al. May 2005 A1
20060050708 Shapiro Mar 2006 A1
20060064736 Ahuja et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075480 Noehring Apr 2006 A1
20060112431 Finn et al. May 2006 A1
20060140400 Brown et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060210071 Chandran et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070058633 Chen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070086397 Taylor Apr 2007 A1
20070160059 Poeluev et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070195788 Vasamsetti et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070255954 Struik Nov 2007 A1
20080177997 Morais et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080307524 Singh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090290635 Kim Nov 2009 A1
20090319775 Buer et al. Dec 2009 A1
20110106956 Luo May 2011 A1
20110209196 Kennedy Aug 2011 A1
20110264915 Cam-Winget et al. Oct 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
1320010 Jun 2003 EP
1324541 Jul 2003 EP
1326157 Jul 2003 EP
0010304 Feb 2000 WO
03036857 May 2003 WO
2005083970 Sep 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (58)
Entry
Kent, Stephen T. “Internet privacy enhanced mail.” Communications of the ACM 36.8 (1993): 48-60.
Li, Renqi, and E. A. Unger. “Security issues with TCP/IP.” ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review 3.1 (1995): 6-13.
LeMay, Michael D., and Jack SE Tan. “Comprehensive message control and assurance with the secure email transport protocol.” Electro/Information Technology Conference, 2004. EIT 2004. IEEE. IEEE, 2004.
Cam-Winget et al. “Security Flaws in 802.11 Data Link Protocols” Communications of the ACM 46.5 (May 2003) pp. 35-39.
Dierks, T. et al.; “The TLS Protocol”; RFC 2246; IETF; Jan. 1999; pp. 23, 28-30.
Hura et al.; “Data and Computer Communications: Networking and Internetworking”; CRC Press, 2001; pp. 337, 450, 453, 467, 471, 483, 484, 485, 489, 491, 526, 599, 609, 617, 618, 621, 937, 1086, 1117, 1118, 1132.
IEEE Standard 802.11; Standard for Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Networks—Specific Requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications; IEEE Press; 1999; pp. 34-41, 50-58.
Kent, S. et al.; “IP Authentication Header”; RFC 2402; IETF; Nov. 1998; 21 pages.
Kent, S. et al.; “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol”; RFC 2401; IETF; Nov. 1998; 62 pages.
Oppliger; “Security at the Internet Layer” Computer 31.9 (1998) pp. 43-47.
Specification of the Bluetooth System; Specification vol. 1—Core, Version 1.0B; Dec. 1, 1999; p. 160.
Sung et al.; “Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Secure Protocol for E-Commerce”; Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks; Oct. 15-17, 2001; pp. 32-39.
“Transmission Control Protocol”; RFC 0793; Darpa Internet Program; Information Sciences Institute; University of Southern California; Sep. 1981.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Mar. 25, 2008; 24 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Nov. 25, 2008; 30 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Dec. 9, 2009; 25 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Aug. 18, 2010; 27 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Jan. 27, 2011; 30 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Feb. 21, 2012; 30 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/921,161 on Apr. 12, 2012; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,869 on Apr. 2, 2013; 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,869 on Sep. 27, 2013; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Jul. 13, 2010; 21 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Dec. 22, 2010; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Feb. 17, 2012; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Dec. 11, 2012; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on May 24, 2013; 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,055 on Nov. 25, 2013; 23 pages.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,434,992 on Sep. 14, 2011; 3 pages.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,434,992 on Dec. 5, 2012; 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in Canadian Application No. 2,434,992 on Dec. 9, 2013; 1 page.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,478,274 on Feb. 3, 2012; 2 pages.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,478,274 on Mar. 14, 2013; 3 pages.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,478,274 on Jan. 7, 2014; 2 pages.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,644,015 on May 23, 2012; 3 pages.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,644,015 on Nov. 4, 2013; 4 pages.
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Jan. 14, 2004; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Mar. 21, 2012; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Aug. 13, 2012; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on Dec. 17, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in Chinese Application No. 200780020042.X on May 6, 2013; 4 pages.
Search Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Jan. 25, 2005; 4 pages.
Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Oct. 31, 2005; 7 pages.
Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Feb. 15, 2006; 2 pages.
Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0418565.8 on Aug. 23, 2006; 3 pages.
Combined Search and Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0623685.5 on Mar. 16, 2007; 5 pages.
Combined Search and Examination Report issued in U.K. Application No. 0721922.3 on Dec. 18, 2007; 5 pages.
Examination Report issued in German Application No. 102004040312.0 on Oct. 24, 2012; 15 pages.
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 07719535.2 on May 13, 2011; 6 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(4) EPC issued in European Application No. 07719535.2 on Feb. 17, 2012; 5 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(4) EPC issued in European Application No. 07719535.2 on Mar. 8, 2013; 5 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(4) EPC issued in European Application No. 07719535.2 on Feb. 7, 2014; 7 pages.
Official Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2009-504535 on Aug. 17, 2011; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in Japanese Application No. 2009-504535 on Dec. 13, 2011; 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in Japanese Application No. 2011-251567 on Apr. 23, 2013; 3 pages.
Office Action issued in Korean Application No. 10-2008-7027745 on Jun. 28, 2013; 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/CA2007/000608 on Aug. 28, 2007; 4 pages.
SunScreen 3.2 Administrators Overview, Sep. 2001, pp. 1-356.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160028740 A1 Jan 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60484656 Jul 2003 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14477637 Sep 2014 US
Child 14877072 US
Parent 10885115 Jul 2004 US
Child 14477637 US