Method and apparatus for push interaction

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10511778
  • Patent Number
    10,511,778
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 5, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 17, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for determining an indication of interaction in a direction towards a webcam. The method includes the steps of determining an object in a region of interest, determining a first size of the object in the region of interest and tracking the object in the region of interest. A second size of the object in the region of interest is then determined, and a push interaction is confirmed as having taken place if the ratio of the second size to the first size is greater than a predetermined value.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for determining push interaction, and more particularly to an apparatus and method for determining a user intended push interaction employing only a standard webcam.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many gesture recognition systems typically employ complex and complicated time of flight cameras, stereo cameras, or other such sophisticated systems. In order to determine action in a z-axis direction relative to a camera, time of flight cameras are equipped with a system for determining a distance from the camera at any time. Similarly, a stereo camera system is able to employ a triangulation or other stereo distance determination. Each of these systems is a complex system not typically employed in a standard computer laptop or other mobile device. Therefore, these systems are not available for use in a more typical computer or mobile device environment.


In order to overcome these drawbacks, various systems employ complex hybrid systems to overcome the z-axis. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,774,075 presents a method and apparatus for determining an object's three-dimensional location (i.e. real world coordinates) using the audio-video infrastructure of a 3G cellular phone or a 3C (Computer, Communications, Consumer) electronic device. A first detection device (e.g. a camera) is used to capture images of the objects. The captured image data is used to compute location data of the object in a first two-dimensional plane. A second detection device (e.g. microphone or infrared detector) may be used to collect additional location data in a second plane, which when combined with image data from the captured images allows the determination of the real world coordinates (x, y, z) of the object. The real-world coordinate data may be used in various applications.


In an alternative embodiment of this '075 patent, if the size of an object of interest is known or can be calculated, and the size of the projected image does not vary due to rotation of the object, a single camera (e.g. the camera in a 3G or 3C mobile device) may be used to obtain three-dimensional coordinate data for the applications.


For use in mobile or other unstable environments, however, calculation of a precise 3D coordinate may be difficult because of various factors. Furthermore, there is no way to guarantee that the object will not rotate. Furthermore, a mobile or other portable platform may result in a webcam that is likely to be moved about quite a bit, thus potentially requiring frequent recalibration of the system. Furthermore, movement may be improperly interpreted as deliberate action, thus resulting in false actions being taken by the system. Therefore, it would be beneficial to provide a method and apparatus that overcome the drawbacks of the prior art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a push interaction useful for determining movement in a z-axis direction relative to a webcam is provided. Rather than relying upon complex systems for making such a determination, a simple system for determining an initial size of an object, and then later comparing a size of an object to that initial size to determine intentional motion in the z-axis direction relative to the camera is provided. Further object tracking in the x and y axis directions places the object at a particular location in a field of view, allowing for selection between one or more objects included in that field of view.


Depth or proximity indications may be provided as feedback to a user of the system. Such indications may be provided in a visual, audible, or other appropriate fashion, allowing the user to determine when a particular selection or other indication has been made, and aiding the user in properly positioning an object. Through the use of such selection mechanism, a user may simulate the selection mechanism employed with a touch screen or conventional keyboard without making contact with any particular surface. Such application may be desirable when considering publically available keypads or other input devices to avoid germs or the like. Furthermore, by receiving such a selection indicators, a user may be encouraged or enabled to change their selection before such selection is confirmed.


While the invention is generally described as applicable to a simple webcam provided in a computer, mobile device or other computing apparatus, the invention may also be applied to any single camera that does not otherwise have the ability to independently determine distance, such as with a single infrared or other camera.


Still other objects and advantages of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part be apparent from the specification and drawings.


The invention accordingly comprises the several steps and the relation of one or more of such steps with respect to each of the others, and the apparatus embodying features of construction, combinations of elements and arrangement of parts that are adapted to affect such steps, all as exemplified in the following detailed disclosure, and the scope of the invention will be indicated in the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the invention, reference is made to the following description and accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a flowchart diagram depicting a method for determining a push interaction in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a flowchart diagram depicting a method for determining a push interaction in accordance with an additional embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram depicting a selection sequence, including feedback provided to a user, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a sequence of images depicting additional feedback to a user in accordance with an embodiment of the invention; and



FIG. 5 is a block diagram depicting a positioning aid constructed in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Detailed embodiments of the present invention will now be described, making reference to the following figures in which like reference number denote like structure or steps. Referring first to FIG. 1, processing begins at step 110, and at step 115 a region of interest is defined. This region of interest may be defined as a predetermined portion of a display or field of view of a camera. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, this region of interest may be designated by an indicator on the screen in which a user is desired to place the object. Once this region of interest is defined, processing passes to step 120 where a sequence for determining whether an object of interest is present in the defined region. In accordance with this sequence, at step 120 various parameters and images are sampled, and at step 125 a determination is made as to whether an object is detected within the region of interest. If this inquiry is answered in the negative, processing returns to step 120 and the object detection sequence continues.


If the inquiry at step 125 is answered in the affirmative, and it is therefore determined that an object has been detected in the region of interest, processing continues at step 130 where an initial size of the object (S0) is determined. This initial size is one that is not necessarily related to the absolute size of the object, but is rather related to the perceived size of the object when placed within the region of interest. Thus, when shown to a webcam, the perceived size is determined, which will be based upon the actual size of the object, as well as distance from the webcam.


Once the initial size of the object has been determined, the object is tracked within the region of interest at step 135, and at step 140, it is confirmed that the object is able to be tracked. If at step 140 it is determined that the object cannot be tracked, processing once again returns to step 120, and the object is detected anew. If on the other hand, it is determined at step 140 that the object is being properly tracked, processing passes to step 145 where a current size of the object (Snew) is measured.


After such a measurement, at step 150 it is determined whether a ratio of the new size to the old size (Snew/S0) is greater than a predetermined threshold. If the inquiry at step 150 is answered in the negative, and therefore the ratio is not greater than the predetermined threshold, processing returns to step 135, and tracking of the object within the region of interest continues. If on the other hand, if the inquiry at step 150 is answered in the affirmative, and it is therefore determined that the ratio is greater than a predetermined threshold, processing continues at step 160 where it is confirmed that a push has been observed. Processing then ends at step 170.


In an alternative embodiment of the invention, in order to improve the accuracy of determining whether a push has been observed, a multi-level threshold scheme may be employed. Thus, as is shown in FIG. 2, after step 130 (FIG. 1) processing passes to step 232, where a threshold number (TN) is set to one, indicating that a first threshold ratio should be employed. Thereafter, processing continues through steps 135, 140 and 145 as described above with respect to FIG. 1. After the size measurement at step 145, processing in FIG. 2 then passes to step 250 where it is determined whether the size ratio (Snew/S0) is greater than a threshold value associated with the first threshold number (TN=1). If this inquiry is answered in the negative, and it is therefore determined at step 250 that the ratio is not greater than the threshold value associated with the first threshold number, processing returns back to step 135.


If the inquiry at step 250 is answered in the affirmative, and it is therefore determined that the size ratio (Snew/S0) is greater than the threshold value associated with the first threshold number (TN=1), processing continues with step 255 where it is inquired as to whether the threshold number is equal to a predetermined number, indicative of the number of threshold tests are to be performed. If this inquiry at step 255 is answered in the negative, and it is therefore determined that the current threshold number is not equal to the desired threshold number, then processing passes to step 257 where the threshold number is incremented by one (in this case to two), and processing returns to step 135.


This processing continues for the predetermined number of threshold tests desired, each sequence using a threshold associated with the then-current threshold number. It is anticipated that each such threshold is larger than the prior threshold, thus allowing for a determination of continued motion forward towards the webcam, but of course any such threshold sequence may be employed to test for any simple or complex desired motion. Once the threshold has been met for the desired number of thresholds, the inquiry at step 255 will be answered in the affirmative, and processing will continue at step 160 of FIG. 1.


In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, the above described push interaction may act as a replacement to touchscreen technology where users are otherwise unwilling to make physical contact with a screen (which can be dirty or otherwise inconvenient) and where the screens and selection choices are preferably limited. Embodiments of the present invention may have numerous applications in conjunction with mobile and other devices including small screens since the object, which may comprise the finger of a user, may be much closer to the camera and hence, determining size changes and tracking the object may be enhanced. Applications may include gaming and other interactive programming. Such a push interaction system as set forth in accordance with embodiments of the present invention allows a webcam system to recognize if an action is deliberate—thus avoiding indicating a selection based upon accidental motion of erroneous object tracking. Similarly, the user may not be required to hold their hand or finger (object) still in space for a relatively long period of time.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the object described above may comprise the finger of a user. The system may therefore involve tracking the finger and recognizing if the finger moves closer towards a camera or not. Furthermore, a plurality of regions of interest may be provided, thus allowing for the determination of selection of one choice from among many. Therefore, as is shown in FIG. 3, a plurality of displayed regions of interest 310- to 310-8 may be provided on a display 300. Of course, any desired number of regions of interest may be provided. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, each region of interest may comprise a button to be selected, a key on a keypad, or any other selectable item.


Implementing the flowchart diagram as set forth in FIGS. 1 and 2, a user's finger or the like may be determined to be within a particular region of interest (310-1 to 310-8) on an x,y basis by positioning the finger by the webcam. In a preferred embodiment, when it is determined that the finger is within one of such regions, and indication on the display is provided, such as a shading of that particular region of interest, or other visual or other indicator that may be understood by the user. If the user moves their finger in the x or y axis direction, when they move from one region to another, the indicator follows along. In accordance with an additional embodiment of the invention, there will be some allowance for movement by the finger (or shake) that is not intended to comprise a movement from one region of interest to another, since buttons or regions of interest are preferably selected based on an approximate position of the finger. Thus, a determination of deliberate desire to move from one region of interest to another will be required before the system indicates such movement. The system may, therefore, allow for some latitude of motion (perhaps accounting for shake of the user's finger, or shake of the imaging apparatus in the x,y direction in addition to the z direction), but beyond a certain range of motion by the user's finger, the system will determine that the next region of interest or button is to be selected. Application of such technology may be in one or more hospital, doctor or other healthcare environment, ATMs, taxi cabs, elevators, interactive billboards, gaming applications, or other situation where contact with a button or the like is preferably avoided.


Thereafter, as is set forth in FIGS. 1 and 2, a deliberate indication of motion towards the camera by the user will provide a selection of the item associated with the currently indicated region of interest. In the case of the multi-threshold determination as set forth in FIG. 2, as the user moves their finger closer to the camera, an indication at the region of interest, such as by sequentially darkening the color each time a threshold is passed, or other visual or audio indications, may be provided to the user. Thus, the user is preferably provided with positive feedback indicating selection. The user may also be made aware of an erroneous selection, and may therefore withdraw their finger in such a case, indicated a correct region of interest in the manner noted above, and then make a selection.


Thus, in order to offer a deliberate method to select an onscreen button or other selection, the user will be able to push through space and see a confirmatory change in color of the selection, or other appropriate indicator. Completion of the push may be highlighted by a final color change or other indicator. If the user changes their mind mid-way, the user may reset and stop the motion before the final indicator has been displayed or otherwise invoked. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the user may be allowed to swipe their hand across the screen to reset. Thus, the system is adapted to link a visual size scale to finger proximity thereby providing feedback to the user that their action/selection is deliberate and registered with the system.


In an alternative embodiment, rather than simply tracking a particular object, such as a user's finger, it may be desirable to track various portions of such an object, thus determining relative movement between these various elements. As is shown in FIG. 4, in image 410 an indicator of the tip of a user's finger is shown at 412. Further shown is a second finger reference point 414 indicating another reference point on the finger to possibly be used in determining the location and push interaction. Thus, as is shown in image 420, indicator 412 has increased in size while finger reference point 414 has disappeared, indicating that the reference point is no longer distinguishable in the image. Together, these two movements may provide an indication of movement of the finger from an upright position, to a more pointing position, relative to the webcam. Similarly, in image 430, reference points 434 indicate a tip and other features, such as skin folding by the joints. Then, as shown in image 440, a change in the relative positioning may be interpreted as a change in hand or finger position, thus aiding in an indication of push or other selection. This embodiment of the invention may be desirable when a user may move a portion of their hand out of field of view of the camera. Thus, as long as one or more of the reference points are visible, a determination of object motion may still be made.


It has further been determined by the inventors of the present invention that users whose finger or the like is in close proximity to a webcam interacting in a push situation may encounter a parallax problem in that as they move their finger closer to the webcam, in a straight line to the display, if they are not pointing directly at the camera, their finger will appear to be moving off in a direction away from the webcam. This “x,y creep” may be compensated for, and may be considered another method for determining whether a push interaction has been encountered. Thus, if the size of an object, such as the user's finger, remains a constant size, but appears to be moving away from the display, a push interaction may be determined. Such motion will not be confused with motion in the x,y direction, as any such movement will result in a reduction of the size of the object, due to the same parallax issues. Preferably, a combination of such parallax and change in size considerations allow for an intelligent determination of user intent and desired interaction.


In an additional embodiment of the invention, it may be desirable to display a visual image captured by the webcam. When doing so, in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention, it may be desirable to provide a depth or proximity indicator to provide real-time feedback to the user regarding the positioning of an object by the user. The system may be adapted to track and display one or more dynamic reference points to provide adequate feedback to the user. Thus, upon positioning an object within a field of view by a user, an indication may be displayed along with the display of the webcam captured image view providing an indication of a target location for the object, or an indication of requested direction of movement, in either the x, y or z axis direction. Such indicator in the x and y axis directions may comprise simple arrows, while movement in the z-axis direction may be indicated by an arrow, an indicator employing sequential different size boxes, circles or the like, these indicators changing appearance as the user approaches the desired z-axis location. Additional audible or other indications may be provided to indicate to the user when movement in the correct direction is made, while ultimately a final indication may be provided when the user has reached the desired location.


Therefore, as is shown by way of example in FIG. 5, an object 510 is recognized and placed within a field of view of a web camera. Preferably, an indicator 522 comprises a desired position and size of object 510. As object 510 is smaller than indicator 522, the user is encouraged to move object 510 closer to the webcam, thus increasing its relative size. In order to further aid in guiding the user, interim indicators 520 and 521 may be shown, further indicating to the user movement forward. Additionally, as the user moves object 510 closer to indicator 522, as each interim indicator 520, 521 is reached an audible, visual or other indication of achievement may be employed. While two such interim indicators are employed, any number may be used. Further, such a system similarly may be employed when object 510 is placed too close to the webcam, and thus object 510 appears larger than indicator 522, the interim indicators being smaller than the object, but larger than indicator 522, and thus indicating movement away from the webcam. These indicators therefore comprise a depth or proximity indicator, and indeed any other embodiment of such an indicator may be employed. Additional embodiments may employ a thermometer or scale type indication, a color based indication, an arrow based indication or the like.


Various embodiments in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention may be desirable in unstable environments, such as the use of a mobile device, laptop, or other non-fixed computing apparatus or webcam. Thus, while the user is able to select between one or more objects on a display without contact thereof employing only a single webcam, the user may also be guided to placement of a particular object in a particular location, including a desired distance from a webcam. Furthermore, relative motion of that object in the z-axis direction towards and away from the webcam may be determined with this simple hardware setup. Furthermore, as the system may employ various object markers, it is possible to account for rotation of the object, thus determining whether a size change is based upon absolute motion, or if the view of the object has changed, thus potentially causing a perceived change in size of the object.


Various embodiments of the present invention may be employed in a number of areas, including as a replacement to touchscreens, such as at an ATM, in a taxi, gaming, interactive billboards, or in other public kiosk locations. Embodiments of the invention may be employed to track a medication to determine whether a user has placed a pill or other medication in their mouth or the like. The system may first position the pill to determine the identity thereof, track the pill to the mouth of a user, and then determine that the pill has been placed therein. For one or more sales promotions, a user may Interactive Billboards (push interaction, probe requested to hold an object up to a simple webcam, and be guided in it positioning so that information may be obtained from the object, thus allowing for advertising, coupons, or other messaging to be provided to the user.


Additionally, a game may be provided where a user is requested to differentiate between a number of objects, locate these objects in the x, y plane in the field of view of a webcam, and then move the object in a z-axis direction towards or away from the webcam to indicate selection, or other interaction between the object and an on-screen indicator. The various embodiments described above relating to proximity detection and indication may also be employed. Such an object may include a user's finger or other desirable free-standing object or the like.


Other potential embodiments or uses of the embodiments of the invention include:


Dancing Games—User may be encouraged to move forward and backwards and to lift up left or right hand/arm based on proximity. Gains points for complying.


Fighting games—Important to understand position and proximity of the user.


Pingpong games fingerpong—move finger forward to use the paddle or hit the pingpong with your finger.


Drumming games—tap the air, to create a beat in sync with the music.


Air Guitar—recognizes you strumming an air guitar. Strum to the beat to win more points.


It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained and, because certain changes may be made in carrying out the above method and in the construction(s) set forth without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.


It is also to be understood that this description is intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall there between.

Claims
  • 1. A method for determining proper positioning of an object relative to a camera, comprising: presenting, on a display, an indication of a desired location for placement of the object relative to a field of view of the camera;determining a movement of the object towards the camera when it appears that the object is moving angularly away from the camera but its size is not changing materially;determining a position of the object within the field of view of the camera relative to the desired location for placement of the object based on at least the determined movement of the object towards the camera; andproviding one or more instructions in response to the determination of the position of the object to the desired location to aid in guiding the user to move the object within the field of view of the camera towards the desired location.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein guiding placement of the object relative to the indication of desired location for placement of the object is repeated until it is confirmed that the object is properly placed.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising employing the determined movement of the object towards the camera to aid in determining positioning of the object relative to the desired location for placement of the object.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying an image of the desired location for the placement of the object.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the desired location for the placement of the object is displayed to a user to aid in properly placing the object.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein if the object is removed from a field of view of the camera and then repositioned within the field of view of the camera, determining a position of the object is performed again.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the object is a medication pill.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the object is a free standing object.
  • 9. A system for determining proper positioning of an object relative to a camera, comprising: a webcam for capturing one or more images;a display arranged to present an indication of a desired location for placement of the object relative to a field of view of the camera; anda processor arranged to process the one or more captured images, the processor operable to present on the display an indication of a desired location for placement of the object relative to the field of view of the camera, provide an instruction guiding in the field of view of the camera placement of the object relative to the indication of desired location for placement of the object, determine a movement of the object towards the camera when it appears that the object is moving angularly away from the camera but its size is not changing materially, and determine a position of the object in the field of view of the camera relative to the desired location for placement of the object based on at least the determined movement of the object towards the camera.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the object is a medication pill.
  • 11. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is operable to guide repeatedly placement of the object relative to the indication of desired location for placement of the object until the processor confirms that the object is properly placed.
  • 12. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor employs the determined movement of the object towards the camera to aid in determining positioning of the object relative to the desired location for placement of the object.
  • 13. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is arranged to cause to be displayed on the display an image of the desired location for the placement of the object.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the desired location for the placement of the object is displayed to a user to aid in properly placing the object.
  • 15. The system of claim 9, wherein if the object is removed from a field of view of the camera and then repositioned within the field of view of the camera, the processor determines the first size of the object.
  • 16. The system of claim 9, wherein the object is a free standing object.
  • 17. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is arranged to repeatedly provide an instruction guiding in the field of view of the camera placement of the object relative to the indication of desired location for placement of the object until the processor confirms that the object is properly placed.
  • 18. The system of claim 9, wherein if the object is removed from a field of view of the camera and then repositioned within the field of view of the camera, the processor determines a position of the object again.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. application Ser. No. 15/374,334, filed Dec. 9, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,257,423, issued Apr. 9, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/799,869, filed Jul. 15, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,538,147, issued Jan. 3, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/036,210, filed on Feb. 28, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,116,553, issued Aug. 25, 2015. The contents of all of the prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (125)
Number Name Date Kind
3814845 Hurlbrink et al. Jun 1974 A
5065447 Barnsley et al. Nov 1991 A
5441047 David et al. Aug 1995 A
5544649 David et al. Aug 1996 A
5619991 Sloane Apr 1997 A
5646912 Cousin Jul 1997 A
5752621 Passamante May 1998 A
5764296 Shin Jun 1998 A
5810747 Brundy et al. Sep 1998 A
5911132 Sloane Jun 1999 A
5961446 Beller et al. Oct 1999 A
6151521 Guo et al. Nov 2000 A
6154558 Hsieh Nov 2000 A
6233428 Fryer May 2001 B1
6283761 Joao Sep 2001 B1
6380858 Yarin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6409661 Murphy Jun 2002 B1
6421650 Goetz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6483993 Misumi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6484144 Martin et al. Nov 2002 B2
6535637 Wootton et al. Mar 2003 B1
6611206 Eshelman et al. Aug 2003 B2
6705991 Bardy Mar 2004 B2
6879970 Shiffman et al. Nov 2005 B2
6988075 Hacker Jan 2006 B1
7184047 Crampton Feb 2007 B1
7184075 Reiffel Feb 2007 B2
7256708 Rosenfeld et al. Aug 2007 B2
7277752 Matos Oct 2007 B2
7304228 Bryden et al. Dec 2007 B2
7307543 Rosenfeld et al. Dec 2007 B2
7317967 DiGianfilippo et al. Jan 2008 B2
7340077 Gokturk Mar 2008 B2
7395214 Shillingburg Jul 2008 B2
7415447 Shiffman et al. Nov 2008 B2
7448544 Louie et al. Nov 2008 B1
7562121 Berisford et al. Jul 2009 B2
7627142 Kurzweil et al. Dec 2009 B2
7657443 Crass et al. Feb 2010 B2
7692625 Morrison et al. Apr 2010 B2
7747454 Bartfeld et al. Jun 2010 B2
7761311 Clements et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769465 Matos Aug 2010 B2
7774075 Lin et al. Aug 2010 B2
7874984 Elsayed et al. Jan 2011 B2
7881537 Ma et al. Feb 2011 B2
7908155 Fuerst et al. Mar 2011 B2
7912733 Clements et al. Mar 2011 B2
7956727 Loncar Jun 2011 B2
7983933 Karkanias et al. Jul 2011 B2
8321284 Clements et al. Nov 2012 B2
20010049673 Dulong et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010056358 Dulong et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020026330 Klein Feb 2002 A1
20020093429 Matsushita et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020143563 Hufford et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030164172 Chumas et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030190076 Delean Oct 2003 A1
20030225325 Kagermeier et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040100572 Kim May 2004 A1
20040107116 Brown Jun 2004 A1
20040155780 Rapchak Aug 2004 A1
20050144150 Ramamurthy et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149361 Saus et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050180610 Kato et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182664 Abraham-Fuchs et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050234381 Niemetz et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050267356 Ramasubramanian et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060066584 Barkan Mar 2006 A1
20060218011 Walker et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060238549 Marks Oct 2006 A1
20070030363 Cheatle et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070118389 Shipon May 2007 A1
20070194034 Vasiadis Aug 2007 A1
20070233035 Wehba et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233049 Wehba et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233050 Wehba et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233281 Wehba et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233520 Wehba et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233521 Wehba et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070008112 Covannon et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070008113 Spoonhower et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070265880 Bartfeld et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070273504 Tran Nov 2007 A1
20080000979 Poisner Jan 2008 A1
20080093447 Johnson et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080114226 Music et al. May 2008 A1
20080114490 Jean-Pierre May 2008 A1
20080138604 Kenney et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140444 Karkanias et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162192 Vonk et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080178126 Beeck et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201174 Ramasubramanian et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080219493 Tadmor Sep 2008 A1
20080275738 Shillingburg Nov 2008 A1
20080290168 Sullivan et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080297589 Kurtz et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080303638 Nguyen et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090012818 Rodgers Jan 2009 A1
20090018867 Reiner Jan 2009 A1
20090043610 Nadas et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048871 Skomra Feb 2009 A1
20090095837 Lindgren Apr 2009 A1
20090127339 Needhan May 2009 A1
20090128330 Monroe May 2009 A1
20090159714 Coyne, III et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090217194 Martin et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090245655 Matsuzaka Oct 2009 A1
20100042430 Bartfeld Feb 2010 A1
20100050134 Clarkson Feb 2010 A1
20100057646 Martin et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100092093 Akatsuka et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100136509 Mejer et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100138154 Kon Jun 2010 A1
20100255598 Melker Oct 2010 A1
20100262436 Chen et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100316979 Von Bismarck Dec 2010 A1
20110021952 Vallone Jan 2011 A1
20110119073 Hanina et al. May 2011 A1
20110141009 Izumi Jun 2011 A1
20110153360 Hanina et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110161109 Pinsonneault et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110195520 Leider et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110275051 Hanina et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120075464 Derenne et al. Mar 2012 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (48)
Entry
Ammouri, S.; Biloduau, G. -A, “Face and Hands Detection and Tracking Applied to the Monitoring of Medication Intake,” Computer and Robot Vision, 2008. CRV '08. Canadian Conference, 147(154):May 28-30, 2008.
Batz, et al. “A computer Vision System for Monitoring Medication Intake,” in Proc. IEEE 2nd Canadian Conf. on Computer and Robot Vision, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2005, pp. 362-369.
Bilodeau et al. Monitoring of Medication Intake Using a Camera System. Journal of Medical Systems 2011. [retrieved on Feb. 18, 2013] Retrieved from ProQuest Technology Collection.
Chen, Pauline W., “Texting as a Health Tool for Teenagers”, The New York Times, Nov. 5, 2009, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/health/0512/899,510.
Danya International, Inc., “Pilot Study Using Cell Phones for Mobile Direct Observation Treatment to Monitor Medication Compliance of TB Patients”, Mar. 20, 2009, www.danya.com/MDOT.asp.
Global Tuberculosis Control: A short update to the 2009 report, World Health Organization, (2009).
Huynh et al., “Real time detection, tracking and recognition of medication intake.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 60 (2009), 280-287.
Mintchell, “Exploring the Limits of Machine Vision”, Automating World, Oct. 1, 2011.
Osterberg, Lars and Blaschke, Terrence, “Adherence to Medication”, New England Journal of Medicine 2005; 353:487-97, Aug. 4, 2005.
Super-Resolution, Wikipedia, (Oct. 5, 2010).
University of Texas, GuideView, Mar. 15, 2007, http://www.sahs.uth.tmc.edu/MSriram/GuideView.
Valin, et al. “Video Surveillance of Medication intake”, Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York City, USA, Aug. 2006.
Wang et al. “Recent Developments in human motion analysis.” Pattern Recognition 36 (220) 585-601 (Nov. 2001).
Whitecup, Morris S., “2008 Patient Adherence Update: New Approaches for Success”, www.guideline.com, The Trend Report Series, (Oct. 1, 2008).
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0001-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/620,686), (dated May 8, 2012), 1-24.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0001-U2 (U.S. Appl. No. 13/558,377), dated May 7, 2013, 1-29.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0002-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,383), (dated May 8, 2012), 1-31.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0002-U2 (U.S. Appl. No. 13/588,380), (dated Mar. 1, 2013), 1-27.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0003-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,603), (dated Feb. 1, 2012), 1-17.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0004-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,721), (dated Apr. 12, 2012), 1-31.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0005-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,037), (dated Sep. 13, 2012), 1-15.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0006-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,510), (dated Aug. 20, 2013).
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0008-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,338), dated Nov. 9, 2012), 1-12.
Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0012-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,518), (dated Jul. 23, 2013), 1-16.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, cited in AI-0001-PCT1 (PCT/US2010/056935) (dated May 31, 2012), 1-8.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0001-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/620,686), (dated Dec. 21, 2011),1-78.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0001-U2 (U.S. Appl. No. 13/558,377), (dated Oct. 22, 2012), 1-21.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0002-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,383), (dated Dec. 22, 2011),1-78.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0002-U2 (U.S. Appl. No. 13/558,380), (dated Oct. 4, 2012), 1-20.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0003-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,603), (dated Oct. 13, 2011),1-74.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0003-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,603), (dated Jun. 13, 2013), 1-16.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0004-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,721), (dated Jan. 6, 2012), 1-31.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0004-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,721), (dated May 9, 2013), 1-25.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0005-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,037), (dated Mar. 28, 2012),1-17.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0005-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,037), (dated Jul. 18, 2013), 1-19.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0006-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,510), (dated Jan. 23, 2013), 1-20.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0008-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,338), (dated Jun. 19, 2012), 1-16.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0012-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,518), (dated Dec. 21, 2012), 1-10.
Non-Final Office Action from PTO, Cited in AI-0013-U1 (U.S. Appl. No. 13/235,387), dated Sep. 12, 2013), 1-16.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0001-PCT1 (PCT/US2010/56935, (dated Dec. 1, 2011),1-9.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0005-PCT1 (PCT/US2011/35093, (dated Dec. 9, 2011),1-8.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0006-PCT1 (PCT/US11/54666), (dated Feb. 28, 2012), 1-13.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0008-PCT1 (PCT/US11/54668), dated Feb. 28, 2012, 1-12.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0012-PCT1 (PCT/US12/41785), (dated Aug. 17, 2012),1-10.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0013-PCT1 (PCT/US12/42843), (dated Aug. 31, 2012), 1-8.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0018-PCT1 (PCT/US2012/051554), (dated Oct. 19, 2012), 1-12.
PCT Search report and written opinion, Cited in AI-0019-PCT (PCT/US12/59139), (dated Dec. 18, 2012), 1-15.
PCT Search report and written Opinion, Cited in AI-0020-PCT1 (PCT/US13/20026), (dated May 8, 2013), 1-14.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190238755 A1 Aug 2019 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15374334 Dec 2016 US
Child 16376195 US
Parent 14799869 Jul 2015 US
Child 15374334 US
Parent 13036210 Feb 2011 US
Child 14799869 US