Method and apparatus for radio antenna frequency tuning

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9231643
  • Patent Number
    9,231,643
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 7, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 5, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
A system that incorporates teachings of the present disclosure may include, for example, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, which can include computer instructions to determine a subset of use cases from a group of use cases stored in a memory of a communication device, and to determine a target use case from among the subset of use cases based on an operational parameter associated with a transceiver of the communication device. Additional embodiments are disclosed.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to a method and apparatus for radio antenna frequency tuning and in particular determining tuning states in a communication device.


BACKGROUND

Existing multi-frequency wireless devices (e.g., radios) use an antenna structure that attempts to radiate at optimum efficiency over the entire frequency range of operation, but can really only do so over a subset of the frequencies. Due to size constraints, and aesthetic design reasons, the antenna designer is forced to compromise the performance in some of the frequency bands. An example of such a wireless device could be a mobile telephone that operates over a range of different frequencies, such as 800 MHz to 2200 MHz. The antenna will not radiate efficiently at all frequencies due to the nature of the design, and the power transfer between the antenna, the power amplifier, and the receiver in the radio will vary significantly.


Additionally, an antenna's performance is impacted by its operating environment. For example, multiple use cases exist for radio handsets, which include such conditions as the placement of the handset's antenna next to a user's head, or in the user's pocket or the covering of an antenna with a hand, all of which can significantly impair the wireless device antenna's radiated efficiency.


Further, many existing radios use a simple circuit composed of fixed value components that are aimed at improving the power transfer from power amplifier to antenna, or from the antenna to the receiver, but since the components used are fixed in value there is always a compromise when attempting to cover multiple frequency bands and multiple use cases.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a communication device;



FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a portion of a transceiver of the communication device of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 3-4 depict illustrative embodiments of a tunable matching network of the transceiver of FIG. 2;



FIGS. 5-6 depict illustrative embodiments of a tunable reactive element of the tunable matching network;



FIG. 7 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a portion of another communication device;



FIG. 8 depicts an exemplary method operating in the communication device in FIG. 1;



FIG. 9 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a look-up table utilized by the communication device of FIG. 1; and



FIG. 10 depicts an exemplary diagrammatic representation of a machine in the form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, when executed, may cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies disclosed herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure provides a method and apparatus for radio antenna frequency tuning. One or more exemplary embodiments can employ an open loop mechanism to solve the fundamental problems associated with antenna performance over a range of frequencies and use cases.


One or more exemplary embodiments can address applying tuning to changing antenna environments without the need for, or use of, a direct feedback loop from the antenna. However, other embodiments can utilized a combination of open loop and closed loop feedback.


One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a method to select a tuning state of a tunable matching network operable in a communication device, where the tunable matching network has a tunable reactance that affects one or more performance parameters of the communication device. The method can include performing the selection of the tuning state based on radio frequency and incomplete information about the antenna environment without direct feedback on the performance from the antenna, and identifying the tuning state resulting in the most desirable performance of the communications device.


In one embodiment, a method is provided that includes obtaining a usage condition associated with operation of a wireless communication device where the usage condition is obtained by a processor of the wireless communication device, selecting a subset of use cases from a group of use cases based on the usage condition, obtaining an operational parameter associated with a transceiver of the wireless communication device where the operational parameter is measured during the operation of the wireless communication device, and selecting a target use case from among the subset of use cases based on the operational parameter.


In another embodiment, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium is provided that includes computer instructions to determine a subset of use cases from a group of use cases stored in a memory of a communication device and to determine a target use case from among the subset of use cases based on an operational parameter associated with a transceiver of the communication device.


In another embodiment, a matching network for a communication device can include an impedance matching circuit connectable with an antenna of the communication device, where the impedance matching circuit comprises one or more variable components. The matching network can also include a controller connectable with the impedance matching circuit. The controller can be configured to select a subset of use cases from a group of use cases based on a usage condition of the communication device, obtain an operational parameter associated with a transceiver of the communication device where the operational parameter is obtained during the operation of the communication device, select a target use case from among the subset of use cases based on the operational parameter, and adjust the one or more variable components based on the determined target use case to tune the impedance matching circuit.


In one embodiment, a look-up table can be utilized that maps possible use case positions to tuning states for the tunable matching network. Each of the possible use cases can be accommodated by a tuning state which attempts to provide a match for whatever performance attributes were selected by the product designer. In some instances, a particular use case can be completely identified by a set of detectable or otherwise known conditions that can be used to point to the correct or desired tuning state in the look up table. In other instances, the conditions (e.g., slider position, speaker activity, and so forth) can only narrow the possible number of use cases down to a subset of possible use cases in the look-up table. In these instances, the method of the present disclosure can be used to identify which of the tuning states can tune the adjustable matching network to achieve the desired performance of the communication device.


In one embodiment, after the appropriate tuning state is identified, the adjustable matching network is tuned to that state until the processor detects changes in the conditions or inputs that may indicate that the use case or the network channel number (e.g., operating frequency) has changed. Those inputs which can indicate a possible change in use case include, but are not limited to, received signal strength indicator (RSSI) or other operational parameters failing to satisfy a threshold. In one embodiment, the inputs can include the handset transmit power being increased by a certain number of power steps or dBs. Both of these inputs or conditions can indicate a possible change in the use case, but other inputs within the handset can also be utilized by the exemplary embodiments to indicate a possible change.


In another embodiment, a receiver parametric measurement, such as the RSSI, can be used as an indicator of which tuning state creates a better matching condition for the current usage case. It should be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that other measurements, including other receiver based measurements, can be used to make this determination, such as bit error rate. It should be further understood that a plurality of measurements can be utilized in selecting a use case from among the possible subset of use cases.



FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a communication device 100. The communication device 100 can comprise a wireless transceiver 102, a user interface (UI) 104, a power supply 114, and a controller 106 for managing operations thereof. In one embodiment, the transceiver 102 can have independent transmitter and receiver portions. The wireless transceiver 102 can utilize short-range and/or long-range wireless access technologies such as Bluetooth, WiFi, Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT), or cellular communication technologies, just to mention a few. Cellular technologies can include, for example, CDMA-1X, WCDMA, UMTS/HSDPA, GSM/GPRS, TDMA/EDGE, EV/DO, WiMAX, and next generation cellular wireless communication technologies as they arise.


The UI 104 can include a depressible or touch-sensitive keypad 108 with a navigation mechanism such as a roller ball, joystick, mouse, or navigation disk for manipulating operations of the communication device 100. The keypad 108 can be an integral part of a housing assembly of the communication device 100 or an independent device operably coupled thereto by a tethered wireline interface (such as a flex cable) or a wireless interface supporting for example Bluetooth. The keypad 108 can represent a numeric dialing keypad commonly used by phones, and/or a Qwerty keypad with alphanumeric keys. The UI 104 can further include a display 110 such as monochrome or color LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) or other suitable display technology for conveying images to an end user of the communication device 100. In an embodiment where the display 110 is a touch-sensitive display, a portion or all of the keypad 108 can be presented by way of the display.


The power supply 114 can utilize common power management technologies (such as replaceable batteries, supply regulation technologies, and charging system technologies) for supplying energy to the components of the communication device 100 to facilitate portable applications. The controller 106 can utilize computing technologies such as a microprocessor and/or digital signal processor (DSP) with associated storage memory such a Flash, ROM, RAM, SRAM, DRAM or other like technologies.



FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a portion of the wireless transceiver 102 of the communication device 100 of FIG. 1. In one embodiment, such as for GSM applications, the transmit and receive portions of the transceiver 102 can include amplifiers 201, 203 coupled to a tunable matching network 202 and an impedance load 206 by way of a switch 204. The load 206 in the present illustration can include an antenna as shown in FIG. 1 (herein antenna 206). A transmit signal in the form of a radio frequency (RF) signal (TX) can be directed to the amplifier 201 which amplifies the signal and directs the amplified signal to the antenna 206 by way of the tunable matching network 202 when switch 204 is enabled for a transmission session. The receive portion of the transceiver 102 can utilize a pre-amplifier 203 which amplifies signals received from the antenna 206 by way of the tunable matching network 202 when switch 204 is enabled for a receive session. Other configurations of FIG. 2 are possible for other types of cellular access technologies, such as CDMA. These undisclosed configurations are contemplated by the present disclosure.



FIGS. 3-4 depict illustrative embodiments of the tunable matching network 202 of the transceiver 102 of FIG. 2. In one embodiment, the tunable matching network 202 can comprise a control circuit 302 and a tunable reactive element 310. The control circuit 302 can comprise a DC-to-DC converter 304, one or more digital to analog converters (DACs) 306 and one or more corresponding buffers 308 to amplify the voltage generated by each DAC. The amplified signal can be fed to one or more tunable reactive components 504, 506 and 508 such as shown in FIG. 5, which depicts a possible circuit configuration for the tunable reactive element 310. In this illustration, the tunable reactive element 310 includes three tunable capacitors 504, 506, 508 and an inductor 502 with a fixed inductance. Other circuit configurations are possible, including use of other components, and are thereby contemplated by the present disclosure.


The tunable capacitors 504, 506, 508 can each utilize technology that enables tunability of the capacitance of said component. One embodiment of the tunable capacitors 504, 506, 508 can utilize voltage or current tunable dielectric materials such as a composition of barium strontium titanate (BST). An illustration of a BST composition is the Parascan® Tunable Capacitor. In another embodiment, the tunable reactive element 310 can utilize semiconductor varactors. Other present or next generation methods or material compositions that can support a means for a voltage or current tunable reactive element are contemplated by the present disclosure.


The DC-to-DC converter 304 can receive a power signal such as 3 Volts from the power supply 114 of the communication device 100 in FIG. 1. The DC-to-DC converter 304 can use common technology to amplify this power signal to a higher range (e.g., 30 Volts) such as shown. The controller 106 can supply digital signals to each of the DACs 306 by way of a control bus of “n” or more wires to individually control the capacitance of tunable capacitors 504, 506, 508, thereby varying the collective reactance of the tunable matching network 202. The control bus can be implemented with a two-wire common serial communications technology such as a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus. With an SPI bus, the controller 106 can submit serialized digital signals to configure each DAC in FIG. 3 or the switches of the tunable reactive element 404 of FIG. 4. The control circuit 302 of FIG. 3 can utilize common digital logic to implement the SPI bus and to direct digital signals supplied by the controller 106 to the DACs.


In another embodiment, the tunable matching network 202 can comprise a control circuit 402 in the form of a decoder and a tunable reactive element 404 comprising switchable reactive elements such as shown in FIGS. 4 and 6. In this embodiment, the controller 106 can supply the control circuit 402 signals via the SPI bus which can be decoded with Boolean or state machine logic to individually enable or disable the switching elements 602. The switching elements 602 can be implemented using various types of switches, such as semiconductor switches or micro-machined switches including those utilized in micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS). By independently enabling and disabling the reactive elements (capacitor or inductor) of FIG. 6 with the switching elements 602, the collective reactance of the tunable reactive element 404 can be varied.


The tunability of the tunable matching networks 202, 204 provides the controller 106 a means to optimize performance parameters of the transceiver 102 such as, for example, but not limited to, transmitter power, transmitter efficiency, receiver sensitivity, power consumption of the communication device, a specific absorption rate (SAR) of energy by a human body, frequency band performance parameters, and so forth. To achieve one or more desirable performance characteristics which can be defined, the communication device 100 can utilize a tuning state selection method, such as depicted in FIG. 8.



FIG. 7 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a portion of a communication device 700 (such as device 100 in FIG. 1) having a tunable matching network which can include, or otherwise be coupled with, a number of components such as a directional coupler, a sensor IC, control circuitry and/or a tuner. The tunable matching network can include various other components in addition to, or in place of, the components shown, including components described above with respect to FIGS. 1-6. In addition to the detector 701 coupled to the directional coupler 725, there is shown a detector 702 coupled to the RF line feeding the antenna 750. A tunable matching network 775 can be coupled to the antenna 750 and a transceiver 780 (or transmitter and/or receiver) for facilitating communication of signals between the communication device 700 and another device or system. In this exemplary embodiment, the tunable match can be adjusted using all or a portion of the detectors for feedback to the tuning algorithm.


In addition to the algorithm described with respect to FIG. 8, other algorithms can be utilized for tuning of the antenna 750, such as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/941,972 filed on Nov. 8, 2010 by Manssen et al., the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. Other algorithms that can be used with the exemplary embodiments described herein are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0121963 filed on Nov. 14, 2007 by Greene, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. The Greene Application describes several methods utilizing Figures of Merit, which in this exemplary embodiment can be determined in whole or in part from measurements of the forward and reverse signals present at detector 701. This exemplary embodiment, can also utilize detector 702 to further improve the ability of the tuning system to enable improved performance of the communication device. One embodiment of the algorithm can utilize the inputs from detector 701 to establish a maximum return loss or VSWR for the matching network. This method can establish a range of impedances around the targeted impedance. This range of impedances may establish an acceptable level of performance. Input from detector 702 can then be utilized to allow the algorithm to find an improved or best impedance within that acceptable range. For instance, the algorithm could continue to modify the matching network 775 in order to increase the RF voltage detected at the antenna feed, while constraining the return loss (measured by detector 701) to stay within the target return loss. In this embodiment, communication device 700 can allow tuning for source impedances that are not 50 ohms. In this example, the lowest insertion loss can be chosen for the tuning algorithm.


In another embodiment, the tuning algorithm can maintain the return loss while minimizing the current drain to determine desired tuning values. The tuning algorithm can utilize various parameters for tuning the device, including output power of the transmitter, return loss, received power, current drain and/or transmitter linearity.



FIG. 8 depicts an embodiment of yet another algorithmic method 800 which can be used for selecting a desired tuning state, while also resolving any inaccuracy in determining a particular use case that affects the antenna environment and resulting antenna performance. In 802, the radio frequency and/or other RF information (e.g., band and sub-band) can be determined. One or more usage conditions or factors such as, for example, but not limited to, audio path configuration, user interface mode of operation, and radio bearer type, can be used at 804 to determine a number of tuning state candidates, which have the highest probability of matching the actual environment of the communication device.


In one embodiment, the tuning state candidates can be obtained from one or more look-up tables 900, such as shown in FIG. 9. In another embodiment, the look-up table 900 can be indexed (e.g., by the controller 106 of the communication device 100 of FIG. 1) during operation according to band and/or use case. The look-up table 900 can be static and/or dynamic. For example, the look-up table 900 can be pre-loaded into the memory of the communication device 100 based on known or estimated use cases, usage conditions or factors, and so forth. In another example, the look-up table 900 can be populated or adjusted based on values determined during operation of the communication device 100. The tuning state candidates can be a subset of use cases that are selected from a group of use cases stored in a memory of the communication device, such as in table 900.


Method 800 can employ a threshold to remove the most unlikely tuning state candidates from consideration. When more than one tuning state candidate has been found at 806, method 800 can resolve which candidate provides the desirable or best match at 808 by examining parameters such as those that are readily available in the wireless device. As an example, but not being limited thereto, method 800 can utilize RSSI, Received Signal Code Power (RSCP), Received Signal Quality (RXQUAL), Received Bit Error Rate, current drain, transmit power control level, and so forth as parameters to select a tuning state from among the subset of tuning states that were identified at 804. One of these or other parameters can be utilized alone in selecting from among the subset of identified tuning states or a combination of parameters can be utilized by method 800 for performing the tuning state selection. In addition, feedback from the cellular base station can be utilized. For instance, if the handset is directed to transmit at a lower power step with one tuning state than another, that information could be utilized to determine which tuning state provides a better match for the handset transmitter. Other parameters can also be utilized for performing the tuning state selection from among the subset of tuning states, including parameters identified in various communication device standards. In another embodiment, the directional coupler of FIG. 7 can be utilized for obtaining the operational parameter that is used with method 800.


Method 800 can set the tuning state and sample the parameter(s) resulting from that tuning state change. In one embodiment, at least one sample for each tuning state setting can be utilized. More samples may also be utilized in which case the sample order can be interleaved as shown in step 808 where the n different possible tuning states can be set and RSSI or other parameter(s) measured for each, with each of the n states repeated m times. The resultant m measurements for each state can be then be averaged or otherwise processed in order to determine which tuning state will be chosen as the preferred state. When samples have been collected they are evaluated at 810 and the use case from among the identified subset of use cases that best matches the desired performance goal is selected, such as, for example, but not limited to, the best RSSI measurement. As described above, use of RSSI is an example and one or more other parameters can be used in place of, or in combination with, the RSSI parameter.


If the number of tuning state candidates or use cases selected at 804 is only one then at 812 the method 800 can select and use that one use case. The method 800 then applies the selected tuning state to the tunable element 814.


Method 800 can enter a loop at 815 which monitors RSSI or the one or more other parameters utilized, and compares measurements (or averaged measurements) to a preset threshold associated with the parameter(s). If the monitored level drops below, or otherwise no longer satisfies the threshold, then the method 800 can return to 804 to determine the tuning state candidate(s). If the threshold is satisfied, then the method 800 can maintain the previous tuning state at 816 and returns to 815. In another embodiment, method 800 can monitor other parameters at 815 which are different from the parameter(s) used at 808, 810 to select the best or desirable use case among the subset of identified use cases. For example, the parameter(s) used to select among the identified use cases can be different from the parameter(s) used to determine whether method 800 needs to again determine tuning state candidates back at 804.



FIG. 10 depicts an exemplary diagrammatic representation of a machine in the form of a computer system 1000 within which a set of instructions, when executed, may cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed above. In some embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device. In some embodiments, the machine may be connected (e.g., using a network) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client user machine in server-client user network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.


The machine may comprise a server computer, a client user computer, a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a control system, a network router, switch or bridge, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine. It will be understood that a device of the present disclosure includes broadly any electronic device that provides voice, video or data communication. Further, while a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.


The computer system 1000 may include a processor 1002 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU, or both), a main memory 1004 and a static memory 1006, which communicate with each other via a bus 1008. The computer system 1000 may further include a video display unit 1010 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a flat panel, a solid state display, or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 1000 may include an input device 1012 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1014 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 1016, a signal generation device 1018 (e.g., a speaker or remote control) and a network interface device 1020.


The disk drive unit 1016 may include a machine-readable medium 1022 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software 1024) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein, including those methods illustrated above. The instructions 1024 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1004, the static memory 1006, and/or within the processor 1002 during execution thereof by the computer system 1000. The main memory 1004 and the processor 1002 also may constitute machine-readable media.


Dedicated hardware implementations including, but not limited to, application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic arrays and other hardware devices can likewise be constructed to implement the methods described herein. Applications that may include the apparatus and systems of various embodiments broadly include a variety of electronic and computer systems. Some embodiments implement functions in two or more specific interconnected hardware modules or devices with related control and data signals communicated between and through the modules, or as portions of an application-specific integrated circuit. Thus, the example system is applicable to software, firmware, and hardware implementations.


In accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, the methods described herein are intended for operation as software programs running on a computer processor. Furthermore, software implementations can include, but not limited to, distributed processing or component/object distributed processing, parallel processing, or virtual machine processing can also be constructed to implement the methods described herein.


The present disclosure contemplates a machine readable medium containing instructions 1024, or that which receives and executes instructions 1024 from a propagated signal so that a device connected to a network environment 1026 can send or receive voice, video or data, and to communicate over the network 1026 using the instructions 1024. The instructions 1024 may further be transmitted or received over a network 1026 via the network interface device 1020.


While the machine-readable medium 1022 is shown in an example embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present disclosure.


The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to: solid-state memories such as a memory card or other package that houses one or more read-only (non-volatile) memories, random access memories, or other re-writable (volatile) memories; magneto-optical or optical medium such as a disk or tape; and/or a digital file attachment to e-mail or other self-contained information archive or set of archives is considered a distribution medium equivalent to a tangible storage medium. Accordingly, the disclosure is considered to include any one or more of a machine-readable medium or a distribution medium, as listed herein and including art-recognized equivalents and successor media, in which the software implementations herein are stored.


Although the present specification describes components and functions implemented in the embodiments with reference to particular standards and protocols, the disclosure is not limited to such standards and protocols. Each of the standards for Internet and other packet switched network transmission (e.g., TCP/IP, UDP/IP, HTML, HTTP) represent examples of the state of the art. Such standards are periodically superseded by faster or more efficient equivalents having essentially the same functions. Accordingly, replacement standards and protocols having the same functions are considered equivalents.


The illustrations of embodiments described herein are intended to provide a general understanding of the structure of various embodiments, and they are not intended to serve as a complete description of all the elements and features of apparatus and systems that might make use of the structures described herein. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Figures are also merely representational and may not be drawn to scale. Certain proportions thereof may be exaggerated, while others may be minimized. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.


Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.


The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving, by a system of a wireless communication device, tuning information from a base station, the wireless communication device including an impedance matching circuit;determining, by the system, a usage condition associated with operation of the wireless communication device;identifying, by the system, a subset of use cases from a group of use cases based on the usage condition;determining, by the system, an operational parameter associated with a transceiver of the wireless communication device, the operational parameter being determined via parametric measurements for each tuning state corresponding to each of the subset of use cases during the operation of the wireless communication device, wherein the parametric measurements are obtained at each of the tuning states at different times during an ordered sequence of sampling and wherein the operational parameter is determined based on averaging the parametric measurements to identify an average operational parameter for each tuning state; andselecting, by the system, a target use case from among the subset of use cases based on the operational parameter and the tuning information received from the base station.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, comprising adjusting, by the system, a variable reactance component based on the target use case to tune the impedance matching circuit of the wireless communication device.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the adjusting of the variable reactance component comprises adjusting a variable capacitance element of the impedance matching circuit.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the selecting of the target use case from among the subset of use cases is based on an averaging of select ones of the parametric measurements.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the operational parameter is not an operational mode of the wireless communication device and is not a wireless protocol.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, comprising: determining, by the system, a second operational parameter associated with the transceiver, the second operational parameter being determined from second parametric measurements collected during the operation of the wireless communication device, wherein the second operational parameter is not the operational mode of the wireless communication device and is not the wireless protocol;comparing, by the system, the second operational parameter to a threshold; andselecting, by the system, a second subset of use cases from the group of use cases responsive to a determination that the second operational parameter does not satisfy the threshold,wherein the operational parameter is different from the second operational parameter.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the operational parameter is associated with a receive portion of the transceiver and is obtained during a receive mode of the wireless communication device.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the operational parameter comprises at least one of a received signal strength indicator, a received signal code power, a transmit power control level, a received signal quality, current drain, or a received bit error rate.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the usage condition comprises at least one of a mechanical configuration of the wireless communication device or a user interface mode of the wireless communication device.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, comprising: obtaining band information associated with the operation of the wireless communication device;storing the group of use cases in a table in a memory of the wireless communication device, wherein the selecting of the subset of use cases from the group of use cases stored in the table is based on the usage condition, the tuning information and the band information.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, comprising adjusting, by the system, a variable reactance component based on the target use case to tune an impedance matching circuit of the wireless communication device, wherein the adjusting of the variable reactance component comprises adjusting one of a micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) switch, a mechanical switch, or a semiconductor switch.
  • 12. A communication device comprising: a transceiver;an impedance matching circuit coupled with the transceiver;a memory to store computer instructions; anda processor coupled with the memory and the impedance matching circuit, wherein the processor, responsive to executing the computer instructions, performs operations comprising: receiving tuning information from a base station;determining a usage condition associated with operation of the communication device;identifying a subset of use cases from a group of use cases based on the usage condition;determining an operational parameter associated with a transceiver of the communication device, the operational parameter being determined via parametric measurements for each tuning state corresponding to each of the subset of use cases during the operation of the communication device, wherein the parametric measurements are obtained at each of the tuning states at different times during an ordered sequence of sampling and wherein the operational parameter is determined based on averaging the parametric measurements to identify an average operational parameter for each tuning state; andselecting a target use case from among the subset of use cases based on the operational parameter and the tuning information received from the base station.
  • 13. The communication device of claim 12, wherein the tuning information includes different power parameters associated with different tuning states.
  • 14. The communication device of claim 12, wherein the selecting of the target use case comprises determining the target use case from among the subset of use cases based on a determination as to which of the average operational parameters correlates with a desired performance goal.
  • 15. The communication device of claim 12, wherein the impedance matching comprises a variable reactance component, and wherein the operations further comprise adjusting the variable reactance component based on the target use case to tune the impedance matching circuit.
  • 16. The communication device of claim 12, wherein the operational parameter comprises a received signal strength indicator, and wherein the usage condition comprises a radio bearer type.
  • 17. The communication device of claim 12, wherein the operational parameter is associated with a receive portion of a transceiver and is obtained during a receive mode of the communication device.
  • 18. A non-transitory computer-readable storage device comprising computer instructions which, responsive to being executed by a processor of a communication device, cause the processor to perform operations comprising: selecting a subset of use cases from a group of use cases based on a usage condition of the communication device;collecting parametric measurements associated with a transceiver of the communication device for each tuning state corresponding to each of the subset of use cases during the operation of the communication device, wherein the collecting of the parametric measurements comprises collecting multiple parametric measurements for each tuning state corresponding to each of the subset of use cases during the operation of the communication device;selecting a target use case from among the subset of use cases based on the parametric measurements, wherein the selecting of the target use case from among the subset of use cases is based on an averaging of select ones of the multiple parametric measurements;receiving tuning information from a base station; andtuning an impedance matching circuit of the communication device by adjusting a variable reactance component based on the target use case and based on the tuning information received from the base station.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage device of claim 18, wherein the tuning information includes different power parameters associated with different tuning states wherein the selecting of the target use case from among the subset of use cases is based on an averaging of select ones of the multiple parametric measurements.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage device of claim 18, wherein the parametric measurements are associated with a receive portion of the transceiver and are obtained during a receive mode of the communication device.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/030,177, filed Feb. 18, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (447)
Number Name Date Kind
2745067 True May 1956 A
3117279 Ludvigson Jan 1964 A
3160832 Beitman Dec 1964 A
3390337 Beitman Jun 1968 A
3443231 Roza May 1969 A
3509500 McNair Apr 1970 A
3571716 Hill Mar 1971 A
3590385 Sabo Jun 1971 A
3601717 Kuecken Aug 1971 A
3742279 Kupsky Jun 1973 A
3749491 Maxfield et al. Jul 1973 A
3794941 Templin Feb 1974 A
3919644 Smolka Nov 1975 A
3990024 Hou Nov 1976 A
3995237 Brunner Nov 1976 A
4186359 Kaegebein Jan 1980 A
4201960 Skutta May 1980 A
4227256 O'Keefe Oct 1980 A
4383441 Willis May 1983 A
4476578 Gaudin Oct 1984 A
4493112 Bruene Jan 1985 A
4509019 Banu et al. Apr 1985 A
4777490 Sharma Oct 1988 A
4799066 Deacon Jan 1989 A
4965607 Wilkins Oct 1990 A
4980656 Duffalo Dec 1990 A
5032805 Elmer Jul 1991 A
5136478 Bruder Aug 1992 A
5142255 Chang Aug 1992 A
5177670 Shinohara Jan 1993 A
5195045 Keane Mar 1993 A
5200826 Seong Apr 1993 A
5212463 Babbitt May 1993 A
5243358 Sanford Sep 1993 A
5258728 Taniyoshi Nov 1993 A
5276912 Siwiak Jan 1994 A
5301358 Gaskill Apr 1994 A
5307033 Koscica Apr 1994 A
5310358 Johnson May 1994 A
5312790 Sengupta May 1994 A
5334958 Babbitt Aug 1994 A
5361403 Dent Nov 1994 A
5371473 Trinh Dec 1994 A
5409889 Das Apr 1995 A
5427988 Sengupta Jun 1995 A
5430417 Martin Jul 1995 A
5446447 Carney Aug 1995 A
5448252 Ali Sep 1995 A
5451567 Das Sep 1995 A
5451914 Stengel Sep 1995 A
5457394 McEwan Oct 1995 A
5472935 Yandrofski Dec 1995 A
5479139 Koscica Dec 1995 A
5486491 Sengupta Jan 1996 A
5496795 Das Mar 1996 A
5502372 Quan Mar 1996 A
5524281 Bradley Jun 1996 A
5548837 Hess et al. Aug 1996 A
5561407 Koscica Oct 1996 A
5564086 Cygan Oct 1996 A
5589844 Belcher et al. Dec 1996 A
5593495 Masuda Jan 1997 A
5635433 Sengupta Jun 1997 A
5635434 Sengupta Jun 1997 A
5640042 Koscica Jun 1997 A
5679624 Das Oct 1997 A
5689219 Piirainen Nov 1997 A
5693429 Sengupta Dec 1997 A
5694134 Barnes Dec 1997 A
5699071 Urakami Dec 1997 A
5721194 Yandrofski Feb 1998 A
5766697 Sengupta Jun 1998 A
5777581 Lilly Jul 1998 A
5778308 Sroka Jul 1998 A
5786727 Sigmon Jul 1998 A
5812572 King Sep 1998 A
5812943 Suzuki Sep 1998 A
5830591 Sengupta Nov 1998 A
5846893 Sengupta Dec 1998 A
5874926 Tsuru Feb 1999 A
5880635 Satoh Mar 1999 A
5886867 Chivukula Mar 1999 A
5892482 Coleman et al. Apr 1999 A
5929717 Richardson Jul 1999 A
5940030 Hampel et al. Aug 1999 A
5963871 Zhinong Oct 1999 A
5969582 Boesch Oct 1999 A
5982099 Barnes et al. Nov 1999 A
5990766 Zhang Nov 1999 A
6009124 Smith Dec 1999 A
6020787 Kim Feb 2000 A
6020795 Kim Feb 2000 A
6029075 Das Feb 2000 A
6045932 Jia Apr 2000 A
6061025 Jackson May 2000 A
6064865 Kuo et al. May 2000 A
6074971 Chiu Jun 2000 A
6096127 Dimos Aug 2000 A
6100733 Dortu Aug 2000 A
6101102 Brand Aug 2000 A
6115585 Matero Sep 2000 A
6125266 Matero et al. Sep 2000 A
6133883 Munson Oct 2000 A
6172385 Duncombe Jan 2001 B1
6215644 Dhuler Apr 2001 B1
6242989 Barber Jun 2001 B1
6281748 Klomsdorf et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281847 Lee Aug 2001 B1
6309895 Jaing Oct 2001 B1
6343208 Ying Jan 2002 B1
6377142 Chiu Apr 2002 B1
6377217 Zhu Apr 2002 B1
6377440 Zhu Apr 2002 B1
6384785 Kamogawa May 2002 B1
6404614 Zhu Jun 2002 B1
6408190 Ying Jun 2002 B1
6414562 Bouisse Jul 2002 B1
6415562 Donaghue Jul 2002 B1
6452776 Chakravorty Sep 2002 B1
6461930 Akram Oct 2002 B2
6466774 Okabe Oct 2002 B1
6492883 Liang Dec 2002 B2
6514895 Chiu Feb 2003 B1
6525630 Zhu Feb 2003 B1
6531936 Chiu Mar 2003 B1
6535076 Partridge Mar 2003 B2
6535722 Rosen Mar 2003 B1
6538603 Chen Mar 2003 B1
6556102 Sengupta Apr 2003 B1
6556814 Klomsdorf Apr 2003 B1
6570462 Edmonson May 2003 B2
6590468 du Toit Jul 2003 B2
6590541 Schultze Jul 2003 B1
6597265 Liang Jul 2003 B2
6608603 Alexopoulos Aug 2003 B2
6624786 Boyle Sep 2003 B2
6640085 Chatzipetros Oct 2003 B1
6657595 Phillips Dec 2003 B1
6661638 Jackson Dec 2003 B2
6670256 Yang Dec 2003 B2
6710651 Forrester Mar 2004 B2
6724611 Mosley Apr 2004 B1
6724890 Bareis Apr 2004 B1
6737179 Sengupta May 2004 B2
6747522 Pietruszynski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759918 Du Toit Jul 2004 B2
6765540 Toncich Jul 2004 B2
6768472 Alexopoulos Jul 2004 B2
6774077 Sengupta Aug 2004 B2
6795712 Vakilian Sep 2004 B1
6825818 Toncich Nov 2004 B2
6839028 Lee Jan 2005 B2
6845126 Dent Jan 2005 B2
6859104 Toncich Feb 2005 B2
6862432 Kim Mar 2005 B1
6864757 Du Toit Mar 2005 B2
6868260 Jagielski Mar 2005 B2
6875655 Lin Apr 2005 B2
6882245 Utsunomiya Apr 2005 B2
6888714 Shaw May 2005 B2
6905989 Ellis Jun 2005 B2
6906653 Uno Jun 2005 B2
6907234 Karr Jun 2005 B2
6920315 Wilcox et al. Jul 2005 B1
6922330 Nielsen Jul 2005 B2
6943078 Zheng Sep 2005 B1
6946847 Nishimori Sep 2005 B2
6949442 Barth Sep 2005 B2
6961368 Dent Nov 2005 B2
6964296 Memory Nov 2005 B2
6965837 Vintola Nov 2005 B2
6987493 Chen Jan 2006 B2
6993297 Smith Jan 2006 B2
6999297 Klee Feb 2006 B1
7009455 Toncich Mar 2006 B2
7071776 Forrester Jul 2006 B2
7106715 Kelton Sep 2006 B1
7107033 D du Toit Sep 2006 B2
7113614 Rhoads Sep 2006 B2
7151411 Martin Dec 2006 B2
7176634 Kitamura Feb 2007 B2
7176845 Fabrega-Sanchez Feb 2007 B2
7180467 Fabrega-Sanchez Feb 2007 B2
7221327 Toncich May 2007 B2
7298329 Diament Nov 2007 B2
7299018 Van Rumpt Nov 2007 B2
7312118 Kiyotoshi Dec 2007 B2
7332980 Zhu Feb 2008 B2
7332981 Matsuno Feb 2008 B2
7339527 Sager Mar 2008 B2
7369828 Shamsaifar May 2008 B2
7426373 Clingman Sep 2008 B2
7427949 Channabasappa et al. Sep 2008 B2
7453405 Nishikido et al. Nov 2008 B2
7468638 Tsai Dec 2008 B1
7469129 Blaker et al. Dec 2008 B2
7531011 Yamasaki May 2009 B2
7535080 Zeng et al. May 2009 B2
7535312 McKinzie May 2009 B2
7539527 Jang May 2009 B2
7557507 Wu Jul 2009 B2
7596357 Nakamata Sep 2009 B2
7633355 Matsuo Dec 2009 B2
7642879 Matsuno Jan 2010 B2
7655530 Hosking Feb 2010 B2
7667663 Hsiao Feb 2010 B2
7671693 Brobston et al. Mar 2010 B2
7705692 Fukamachi et al. Apr 2010 B2
7711337 McKinzie May 2010 B2
7714676 McKinzie May 2010 B2
7714678 du Toit et al. May 2010 B2
7728693 du Toit et al. Jun 2010 B2
7760699 Malik Jul 2010 B1
7768400 Lawrence et al. Aug 2010 B2
7786819 Ella Aug 2010 B2
7795990 du Toit Sep 2010 B2
7852170 McKinzie Dec 2010 B2
7856228 Lekutai et al. Dec 2010 B2
7865154 Mendolia Jan 2011 B2
7907094 Kakitsu et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917104 Manssen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7949309 Rofougaran May 2011 B2
7969257 du Toit Jun 2011 B2
7983615 Bryce et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991363 Greene Aug 2011 B2
8008982 McKinzie Aug 2011 B2
8072285 Spears Dec 2011 B2
8112043 Knudsen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8170510 Knudsen et al. May 2012 B2
8190109 Ali et al. May 2012 B2
8204446 Scheer Jun 2012 B2
8217731 McKinzie et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217732 McKinzie Jul 2012 B2
8299867 McKinzie, III Oct 2012 B2
8320850 Khlat Nov 2012 B1
8325097 McKinzie, III et al. Dec 2012 B2
8405563 McKinzie et al. Mar 2013 B2
8421548 Spears et al. Apr 2013 B2
8432234 Manssen et al. Apr 2013 B2
8442457 Harel et al. May 2013 B2
8457569 Blin Jun 2013 B2
8472888 Manssen et al. Jun 2013 B2
8558633 McKinzie, III Oct 2013 B2
8564381 McKinzie Oct 2013 B2
8594584 Greene et al. Nov 2013 B2
8620236 Manssen et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620246 McKinzie et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620247 McKinzie et al. Dec 2013 B2
8655286 Mendolia Feb 2014 B2
8674783 Spears et al. Mar 2014 B2
8680934 McKinzie et al. Mar 2014 B2
8693963 du Toit et al. Apr 2014 B2
8712340 Hoirup et al. Apr 2014 B2
8787845 Manssen et al. Jul 2014 B2
20020008672 Gothard Jan 2002 A1
20020030566 Bozler Mar 2002 A1
20020079982 Lafleur et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020109642 Gee et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118075 Ohwada Aug 2002 A1
20020145483 Bouisse Oct 2002 A1
20020167963 Joa-Ng Nov 2002 A1
20020183013 Auckland et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020187780 Souissi Dec 2002 A1
20020191703 Ling Dec 2002 A1
20020193088 Jung Dec 2002 A1
20030060227 Sekine Mar 2003 A1
20030071300 Yashima Apr 2003 A1
20030114124 Higuchi Jun 2003 A1
20030142022 Ollikainen Jul 2003 A1
20030193997 Dent Oct 2003 A1
20030199286 D du Toit Oct 2003 A1
20030210206 Phillips Nov 2003 A1
20030216150 Ueda Nov 2003 A1
20030232607 Le Bars Dec 2003 A1
20040009754 Smith Jan 2004 A1
20040090372 Nallo May 2004 A1
20040100341 Luetzelschwab May 2004 A1
20040127178 Kuffner Jul 2004 A1
20040137950 Bolin Jul 2004 A1
20040202399 Kochergin Oct 2004 A1
20040227176 York Nov 2004 A1
20040232982 Ichitsubo et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040257293 Friedrich Dec 2004 A1
20040263411 Fabrega-Sanchez et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050007291 Fabrega-Sanchez Jan 2005 A1
20050032488 Pehlke Feb 2005 A1
20050032541 Wang Feb 2005 A1
20050042994 Otaka Feb 2005 A1
20050059362 Kalajo Mar 2005 A1
20050082636 Yashima Apr 2005 A1
20050085204 Poilasne et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093624 Forrester et al. May 2005 A1
20050130608 Forse Jun 2005 A1
20050130699 Kim Jun 2005 A1
20050208960 Hassan Sep 2005 A1
20050215204 Wallace Sep 2005 A1
20050227633 Dunko Oct 2005 A1
20050259011 Vance Nov 2005 A1
20050264455 Talvitie Dec 2005 A1
20050282503 Onno Dec 2005 A1
20060003537 Sinha Jan 2006 A1
20060009165 Alles Jan 2006 A1
20060077082 Shanks et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060099915 Laroia et al. May 2006 A1
20060119511 Collinson Jun 2006 A1
20060148415 Hamalainen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060160501 Mendolia Jul 2006 A1
20060183431 Chang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060183433 Mori et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060183442 Chang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195161 Li et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060205368 Bustamante Sep 2006 A1
20060281423 Caimi Dec 2006 A1
20070013483 Stewart Jan 2007 A1
20070035458 Ohba Feb 2007 A1
20070042725 Poilasne Feb 2007 A1
20070042734 Ryu Feb 2007 A1
20070063788 Zhu Mar 2007 A1
20070080888 Mohamadi Apr 2007 A1
20070082611 Terranova et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070085609 Itkin Apr 2007 A1
20070091006 Thober et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070111681 Alberth et al. May 2007 A1
20070142011 Shatara Jun 2007 A1
20070142014 Wilcox Jun 2007 A1
20070149146 Hwang Jun 2007 A1
20070171879 Bourque Jul 2007 A1
20070182636 Carlson Aug 2007 A1
20070184825 Lim et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194859 Brobston Aug 2007 A1
20070197180 McKinzie et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070200766 McKinzie Aug 2007 A1
20070200773 Dou et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070248238 Abreu et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070285326 McKinzie Dec 2007 A1
20070293176 Yu Dec 2007 A1
20080007478 Jung Jan 2008 A1
20080018541 Pang Jan 2008 A1
20080055016 Morris Mar 2008 A1
20080081670 Rofougaran Apr 2008 A1
20080090539 Thompson Apr 2008 A1
20080094149 Brobston Apr 2008 A1
20080106350 McKinzie May 2008 A1
20080122553 McKinzie May 2008 A1
20080122723 Rofougaran May 2008 A1
20080129612 Wang Jun 2008 A1
20080158076 Walley Jul 2008 A1
20080261544 Blin Oct 2008 A1
20080274706 Blin Nov 2008 A1
20080280570 Blin Nov 2008 A1
20080285729 Glasgow et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294718 Okano Nov 2008 A1
20080300027 Dou Dec 2008 A1
20080305749 Ben-Bassat Dec 2008 A1
20080305750 Alon et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080309617 Kong et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090002077 Rohani et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090027286 Ohishi Jan 2009 A1
20090039976 McKinzie, III Feb 2009 A1
20090082017 Chang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090109880 Kim et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090121963 Greene May 2009 A1
20090149136 Rofougaran Jun 2009 A1
20090180403 Tudosoiu Jul 2009 A1
20090184879 Derneryd Jul 2009 A1
20090215446 Hapsari et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090231220 Zhang et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090253385 Dent et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090264065 Song Oct 2009 A1
20090278685 Potyrailo Nov 2009 A1
20090295651 Dou et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323572 Shi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323582 Proctor et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100041348 Wilcox et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100053009 Rofougaran Mar 2010 A1
20100060531 Rappaport Mar 2010 A1
20100073103 Spears et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100085260 McKinzie Apr 2010 A1
20100085884 Srinivasan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100105425 Asokan Apr 2010 A1
20100156552 McKinzie Jun 2010 A1
20100164640 McKinzie Jul 2010 A1
20100164641 McKinzie Jul 2010 A1
20100232474 Rofougaran et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100244576 Hillan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100285836 Horihata et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100302106 Knudsen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304688 Knudsen Dec 2010 A1
20110002080 Ranta Jan 2011 A1
20110012790 Badaruzzaman Jan 2011 A1
20110014879 Alberth et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110014886 Manssen Jan 2011 A1
20110043298 McKinzie Feb 2011 A1
20110043328 Bassali Feb 2011 A1
20110053524 Manssen Mar 2011 A1
20110063042 Mendolia Mar 2011 A1
20110086600 Muhammad Apr 2011 A1
20110086630 Manssen Apr 2011 A1
20110102290 Milosavljevic May 2011 A1
20110105023 Scheer et al. May 2011 A1
20110116423 Rousu et al. May 2011 A1
20110117863 Camp, Jr. et al. May 2011 A1
20110117973 Asrani et al. May 2011 A1
20110121079 Lawrence et al. May 2011 A1
20110133994 Korva Jun 2011 A1
20110140982 Ozden et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110183628 Baker Jul 2011 A1
20110183633 Ohba Jul 2011 A1
20110195679 Lee et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110227666 Manssen Sep 2011 A1
20110237207 Bauder Sep 2011 A1
20110249760 Chrisikos et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110250852 Greene Oct 2011 A1
20110254637 Manssen Oct 2011 A1
20110254638 Manssen Oct 2011 A1
20110256857 Chen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110281532 Shin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110299438 Mikhemar Dec 2011 A1
20110306310 Bai Dec 2011 A1
20120051409 Brobston et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062431 Tikka et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120075159 Chang Mar 2012 A1
20120084537 Indukuru et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120094708 Park Apr 2012 A1
20120100802 Mohebbi Apr 2012 A1
20120112851 Manssen May 2012 A1
20120112852 Manssen et al. May 2012 A1
20120119843 du Toit et al. May 2012 A1
20120119844 du Toit et al. May 2012 A1
20120154975 Oakes Jun 2012 A1
20120214421 Hoirup Aug 2012 A1
20120220243 Mendolia Aug 2012 A1
20120243579 Premakanthan et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120286586 Balm Nov 2012 A1
20120293384 Knudsen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120295554 Greene et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120295555 Greene et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130005277 Klomsdorf et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130052967 Black et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130056841 Hsieh et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130106332 Williams et al. May 2013 A1
20130122829 Hyvonen et al. May 2013 A1
20130137384 Desclos et al. May 2013 A1
20130154897 Sorensen et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130215846 Yerrabommanahalli et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130315285 Black et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140002323 Ali et al. Jan 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (33)
Number Date Country
101640949 Feb 2010 CN
19614655 Oct 1997 DE
102008050743 Apr 2010 DE
102009018648 Oct 2010 DE
0685936 Jun 1995 EP
0909024 Apr 1999 EP
1079296 Feb 2001 EP
1137192 Sep 2001 EP
1298810 Apr 2006 EP
2328233 Jun 2011 EP
2388925 Nov 2011 EP
2424119 Feb 2012 EP
03276901 Mar 1990 JP
02-077580 Sep 1991 JP
9321526 Dec 1997 JP
10209722 Aug 1998 JP
2000124066 Apr 2000 JP
2005-130441 May 2005 JP
100645526 Nov 2006 KR
10-0740177 Jul 2007 KR
0171846 Sep 2001 WO
2006031170 Mar 2006 WO
2008030165 Mar 2008 WO
2009064968 May 2009 WO
2009108391 Sep 2009 WO
2009155966 Dec 2009 WO
2010121914 Oct 2010 WO
2011044592 Apr 2011 WO
2011084716 Jul 2011 WO
2011133657 Oct 2011 WO
2011028453 Oct 2011 WO
2012067622 May 2012 WO
2012085932 Jun 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
Payandehjoo, Kasra et al., “Investigation of Parasitic Elements for Coupling Reduction in MultiAntenna Hand-Set Devices”, Published online Jan. 22, 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
Bezooijen, A. et al., “A GSM/EDGE/WCDMA Adaptive Series-LC Matching Network Using RF-MEMS Switches”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2008, 2259-2268.
Eiji, N., “High-Frequency Circuit and Its Manufacture”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 1998, No. 13, Nov. 30, 1998 & JP 10 209722 A (Seiko Epson Corp), Aug. 7, 1998.
Huang, Libo et al., “Theoretical and experimental investigation of adaptive antenna impedance matching for multiband mobile phone applications”, IEEE, Sep. 7, 2005, 13-17.
Hyun, S., “Effects of strain on the dielectric properties of tunable dielectric SrTiO3 thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 2, Jul. 9, 2001.
Ida, I. et al., “An Adaptive Impedence Matching System and Its Application to Mobile Antennas”, TENCON 2004, IEEE Region 10 Conference, See Abstract ad p. 544, Nov. 21-24, 2004, 543-547.
Katsuya, K. , “Hybrid Integrated Circuit Device”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication number: 03-276901, Date of publication of application: Sep. 12, 1991.
Manssen, “Method and Apparatus for Managing Interference in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/326,206, filed Apr. 20, 2010.
Paratek Microwave, Inc., “Method and Appartus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, International Application No. PCT/US11/59620; Filed Nov. 7, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/046241, Mar. 2, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/056413, Jul. 27, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Nov. 16, 2011, International Application No. PCT/US/2011/038543.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT Application No. PCT/US08/005085, Jul. 2, 2008.
Pervez, N.K. , “High Tunability barium strontium titanate thin films for RF circuit applications”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 19, Nov. 8, 2004.
Petit, Laurent, “MEMS-Switched Parasitic-Antenna Array for Radiation Pattern Diversity”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2009, 2624-2631.
Qiao, et al., “Antenna Impedance Mismatch Measurement and Correction for Adaptive COMA Transceivers”, IEEE, Jan. 2005.
Qiao, et al., “Measurement of Antenna Load Impedance for Power Amplifiers”, The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, Sep. 13, 2004.
Stemmer, Susanne, “Low-loss tunable capacitors fabricated directly on gold bottom electrodes”, Applied Physics Letters 88, 112905, Mar. 15, 2006.
Taylor, T.R. , “Impact of thermal strain on the dielectric constant of sputtered barium strontium titanate thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 11, Mar. 18, 2002.
Tombak, Ali, “Tunable Barium Strontium Titanate Thin Film Capacitors For RF and Microwave Applications”, IEEE Microwave and Wireles Components Letters, vol. 12, Jan. 2002.
Xu, Hongtao, “Tunable Microwave Integrated Circuits using BST Thin Film Capacitors with Device”, Integrated Ferroelectrics, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, University of California, 2005, Apr. 2005.
Zuo, S., “Eigenmode Decoupling for Mimo Loop-Antenna Based on 180 Coupler”, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 26, Aug. 2011, 11-20.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140187180 A1 Jul 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13030177 Feb 2011 US
Child 14200222 US