The present invention relates generally to the field of reducing the presence of carbon dioxide (CO2), and in specific embodiments, to reducing the carbon dioxide in a gaseous exhaust stream from power plants and other types of industrial plants, and forming a Syngas (CO+H2) that can, in turn, be used in the production of energy such as liquid fuels; for example, Ethanol.
Concern about global warming eventually leads to discussions about the need to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide that pours into the earth's atmosphere on a daily basis from power plants and other industrial factories. At the same time, concerns about dwindling supplies of fossil fuels have encouraged the development of liquid fuels such as Ethanol as future replacement fossil fuels. Unfortunately, most present methods of producing a liquid fuel such as Ethanol result in as much or more carbon dioxide being introduced into the atmosphere as does burning fossil fuels.
Therefore, a method for producing a Syngas, (easily convertible to Ethanol) from gaseous streams exhausted by industrial plants would offer many advantages in cost, as well as, an overall reduction in the carbon dioxide dumped into the atmosphere.
The present invention discloses methods and apparatus for reducing the carbon dioxide that is often present in gaseous streams exhausted or emitted from various power plants and types of industrial plants, such as a cement plant. For example, the typical gaseous exhaust stream of about 400,000 lbs/hr total from a cement plant will contain about 30%-40% (about 160,000 lbs/hr) of carbon dioxide (CO2). However, instead of being exhausted to the atmosphere, according to the invention, this gaseous stream is provided to a reaction chamber, such as, for example, a pyrolysis chamber. Reactions take place in the pyrolysis chamber such that the gaseous stream is converted to contain Syngas (CO+H2) and a reduced amount of carbon dioxide (i.e., about 75,195 lbs/hr). The reduction in carbon dioxide is about 53%, and the Syngas can then be cleaned and used as a feedstock for the production of Ethanol. For example, a bio-catalytic process such as a Fischer-Tropsch process could be used to produce the Ethanol.
More specifically, the process for reducing the carbon dioxide and forming the Syngas comprises maintaining a reaction chamber, such as a pyrolysis chamber, at a temperature of between about 400° C. and 5000° C. (typically between 400° C. and 2000° C.) and at a pressure of about one atmosphere or greater. Note, when using a Plasma Arc Gasification chamber, temperatures in the plasma arc zone can reach between 3000° C. and 7000° C. Heat is added as required since some desired reactions are endothermic. Although a pyrolysis chamber is used in a preferred embodiment, a conventional gasifier reactor, a gasification reactor or a plasma arc reactor is also believed to be suitable. A carbonaceous material such as coal, coke, solid waste, etc., is also provided to the reactor such that a Boudouard reaction (i.e. C+CO22CO) takes place.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
The making and using of the presently preferred embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
Referring now to
The reaction in the pyrolysis chamber typically will take place at about one atmosphere or one bar and at a temperature of between about 400° C. and 2000° C., and preferably at about 1330° C. The primary chemical reaction that takes place in the pyrolysis reactor is the reaction of the carbonaceous material such as carbon (C) with carbon dioxide (CO2) according to:
C+CO22CO, Equation (1)
which is also sometimes referred to as the Boudouard reaction.
Other reactions that may occur in the reaction chamber are:
C+H2OCO+H2, Equation (2)
often referred to as a gasification with steam;
CO+H2OH2+CO2, Equation (3)
referred to as a water-gas shift reaction; and
CnHm+nH2OnCO+(n+½m)H2, Equation (4)
for steam reforming.
Importantly, as seen from Equation (1), the carbon (C) provided by the source 18 combines with one of the oxygen (O) atoms of the carbon dioxide (CO2) molecules to form two molecules of carbon monoxide (2CO) which, of course, reduces the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the reaction chamber. In addition, as indicated by Equation (2), if water (i.e. steam) is available in the pyrolysis reactor, the carbon (C) will also react with the water (H2O) to produce carbon monoxide and free hydrogen (H2). It will also be appreciated that all of the carbon dioxide (CO2) will not be converted to 2CO (i.e. carbon monoxide). Further, the steam (H2O) may also react with some of the carbon monoxide (CO) to reform some carbon dioxide (CO2) and some hydrogen (H2) as indicated by Equation (3). Consequently, the pyrolysis reactor discharges Syngas as indicated on line 24 comprised of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen (H2) a reduced amount of carbon dioxide (CO2), as indicated by block 26. Also, as shown, there will typically be a vitrified slag or ash product 28 produced by the process depending upon the temperature of the pyrolysis reactor. The chemical content of the vitrified slag or ash will, of course, vary depending upon the carbonaceous source and temperature of the pyrolysis reactor.
The Syngas may then be provided to an emission control system 30 to remove impurities and clean up the Syngas. The Syngas control and cleanup system will remove impurities in the Syngas from the pyrolysis reactor. Depending upon the feed to the pyrolysis reactor, the impurities in the Syngas could be about 0.5 wt. % chlorine and 0.8 wt. % sulfur based upon an elemental analysis of the feed, as an example. Most of the sulfur is converted to hydrogen sulfide (H2S) but some is converted to carbonyl sulfide (COS). Chlorine is converted to hydrogen chloride (HCl). Trace elements of mercury and arsenic can be found in the Syngas prior to cleaning. Some particulate carryover occurs with the Syngas from the pyrolysis reactor. Selection of the technology for gas cleanup depends upon depends upon the purity requirements of downstream processes using the Syngas.
Particulate control is typically a Metal Candle filter or Water scrubber in combination with a cyclone. Sulfur recovery is typically a Claus plant. The acid gases such as hydrogen chloride are recovered by solvent-based processes such as Selexol or Rectisol.
Also as shown, the carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Syngas is removed and may be returned to the pyrolysis reactor, as indicated by dotted line 12a. Thus, Syngas comprised of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2) is available for further processing, as indicated at block 32.
An example of the process of reducing the carbon dioxide in a gaseous stream from a power plant or rotary cement kiln is as follows:
In the embodiment shown in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, other known ecologically friendly processes can be combined with the inventive process described above. As an example and referring to
Referring now to
CO+H2O→CO2+H2. Equation (5)
Thus, it will be appreciated that the water-gas shift reactor 52 can be adjusted to produce Syngas having a wide range of molar ratios to meet the needs of various downstream processes that convert or use Syngas. Various downstream processes presently in use may successfully operate with carbon monoxide CO to hydrogen H2 ratios that range between 0.2 to 5.0 moles of carbon monoxide to 5.0 to 0.2 moles of hydrogen.
More specifically, a mass flow rate of 156,147 lbs/hr of carbon monoxide (CO) represents 5,574.7 lbmole/hr, and 2.545 lbs/hr of hydrogen (H2) represents 1,262.4 lbmole/hr of hydrogen (H2). Therefore, as an example, the water-gas shift reactor may be set to shift or rearrange the amount of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2) such that the final mixture ratio comprises 5,127.8 lbmole/hr of carbon monoxide (CO) and 1,709.3 lbmole/hr of hydrogen (H2). This shift is selected to facilitate the reaction that produces Ethanol (C2H5OH). The reaction is shown below in Equation (6).
CO+H2+H2O→C2H5OH. Equation (6)
Therefore, similar to the above discussion, this reaction takes place with a carbon monoxide (CO) to hydrogen (H2) molar ratio of between 3.0 and 0.2 of carbon monoxide to 1.0 of hydrogen. With this adjustment, the production of Ethanol at 100% of its actual experimental yield from a bio-catalytic reactor is 60,136 lbs/hr of Ethanol, is about 80,120,000 gallons/yr after distillation.
This reaction does not produce carbon dioxide (CO2). Therefore, from the start of the industrial gaseous stream 14 containing 160,000 lbs/hr of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the discharge of the pyrolysis reactor 10, the reduction in emitted carbon dioxide (CO2) is 75,105 lbs/hr, or a reduction of about 53%. The water-gas shift adds about 19,667 lbs/hr of carbon dioxide (CO2) for a total of 94,862 lbs/hr of carbon dioxide (CO2) rather than the original 160,000 lbs/hr for about a total 40% reduction. Of course, in addition to the reduction in exhausted CO2, there is a bonus of 60,136 lbs/hr (or 80,120,000 gallons/yr) of Ethanol.
Referring to
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
This application is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 12/271,227 filed Nov. 14, 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,932,298, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Reducing CO2 in a Stream by Conversion to a Syngas for Production of Energy,” which is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 11/956,107, filed Dec. 13, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,923,476, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Reducing CO2 in a Stream by Conversion to a Syngas for Production of Energy,” which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4166786 | Duraiswamy et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4752623 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
5937652 | Abdelmalek | Aug 1999 | A |
20040018144 | Briscoe | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060143980 | Rapier et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070004809 | Lattner et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070099038 | Galloway | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137107 | Barnicki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070254969 | Olah et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080169449 | Mundschau | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080307703 | Dietenberger et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090156695 | Young | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170968 | Nahas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221720 | Belt et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090221721 | Norbeck et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100137459 | Stites et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100200810 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110067306 | Balmas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110186783 | Young | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9711904 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 2005001977 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2007022639 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Roine, A., et al., “HSC Chemistry® v.5.0,” Chemical Reaction and Equilibrium Software with Extensive Thermochemical Database Product Instruction Manual, Jun. 28, 2002, Chapters 11, 13 and 14, 44 pages, Outokumpu Research Oy. |
Rosenberg, W.G., et al., “Financing IGCC—3 Party Covenant,” BSCIA Working Paper Jan. 2004, Energy Technology Innovation Project, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Feb. 2004, 143 pgs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. |
ConocoPhillips Technology Solutions, Mar. 2004, 15 pgs. |
Holt, N., “Gasification Process Selection—Trade-Offs and Ironies,” Presented at the Gasification Technologies Conference 2004, Oct. 3-6, 2004, pp. 1-10, JW Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC. |
L.-Q., E., “Plasma Processing of Municipal Solid Waste,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 34, No. 4B, Dec. 2004, pp. 1587-1593. |
URS Corporation, “Summary Report: Evaluation of Alternative Solid Waste Processing Technologies,” Prepared for City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works Bureau of Sanitation, Sep. 2005, 40 pages, Los Angeles, CA. |
“Technology Evaluation and Economic Analysis of Waste Tire Pyrolysis, Gasification and Liquefaction,” Integrated Waste Management Board, Contractor's Report, Mar. 2006, University of California Riverside, 103 pages. |
Stiegel, G.J., “Gasification—Versatile Solutions: Gasification Technologies Overview,” NASEO 2006 Annual Meeting, Seattle, Washington, Sep. 10-13, 2006, 35 pages, National Energy Technology Laboratory. |
Young, G.C., “Zapping MSW with Plasma Arc: An economical evaluation of a new technology for municipal solid waste treatment facilities,” Pollution Engineering, Nov. 2006, pp. 26-29. |
Young, G.C., “How Trash Can Power Ethanol Plants,” Public Utilities Fortnightly, Feb. 2007, pp. 72-74, 76. |
Van Bibber, L., et al., “Baseline Technical and Economic Assessment of a Commercial Scale Fischer-Tropsch Liquids Facility,” DOE/NETL-2007/1260, Final Report, Apr. 9, 2007, 79 pgs. |
Higman, C., et al., “Gasification: The Thermodynamics of Gasification,” Second edition, 2008, Elsevier Publishing, 5 pages. |
Young, G., “From Waste Solids to Fuel,” Pollution Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2008, 4 pages. |
Lemonidou, A.A., et al., “Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over 5 wt.% Ni/CaO-A12O3 catalyst,” Applied Catalysis A: General 228, 2002, pp. 227-235. |
Choudhary, V.R., et al., “Simultaneous steam and CO2 reforming of methane to syngas over NiO/MgO/SA-5205 in present and absence of oxygen,” Applied Catalysis A: General 168, 1998, pp. 33-46. |
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” International Application No. PCT/US2012/37775, Applicant: GYCO, Inc., mailing date: Aug. 9, 2012, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110186783 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12271227 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 13085175 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11956107 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 12271227 | US |