This invention relates to surgical methods and apparatus in general, and more particularly to surgical methods and apparatus for improving mitral valve function.
Mitral valve repair is the procedure of choice to correct mitral regurgitation of all etiologies. With the use of current surgical techniques, between 70% and 95% of regurgitant mitral valves can be repaired. The advantages of mitral valve repair over mitral valve replacement are well documented. These include better preservation of cardiac function and reduced risk of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, thromboembolism and endocarditis.
In current practice, mitral valve surgery requires an extremely invasive approach that includes a chest wall incision, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac and pulmonary arrest, and an incision on the heart itself to gain access to the mitral valve. Such a procedure is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Due to the risks associated with this procedure, many of the sickest patients are denied the potential benefits of surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. In addition, patients with moderate, symptomatic mitral regurgitation are denied early intervention and undergo surgical correction only after the development of cardiac dysfunction.
Mitral regurgitation is a common occurrence in patients with heart failure and a source of important morbidity and mortality in these patients. Mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure is caused by changes in the geometric configurations of the left ventricle, papillary muscles and mitral annulus. These geometric alterations result in mitral leaflet tethering and incomplete coaptation at systole. In this situation, mitral regurgitation is corrected by plicating the mitral valve annulus, either by (i) sutures alone or by (ii) sutures in combination with a support ring, so as to reduce the circumference of the distended annulus and restore the original geometry of the mitral valve annulus.
More particularly, current surgical practice for mitral valve repair generally requires that the posterior mitral valve annulus be reduced in radius by surgically opening the left atrium and then fixing sutures, or sutures in combination with a support ring, to the internal surface of the annulus; this structure is used to pull the annulus back into a smaller radius, thereby reducing mitral regurgitation by improving leaflet coaptation.
This method of mitral valve repair, generally termed “annuloplasty”, effectively reduces mitral regurgitation in heart failure patients. This, in turn, reduces symptoms of heart failure, improves quality of life and increases longetivity. Unfortunately, however, the invasive nature of mitral valve surgery and the attendant risks render most heart failure patients poor surgical candidates. Thus, a less invasive means to increase leaflet coaptation and thereby reduce mitral regurgitation in heart failure patients would make this therapy available to a much greater percentage of patients.
Mitral regurgitation also occurs in approximately 20% of patients suffering acute myocardial infarction. In addition, mitral regurgitation is the primary cause of cardiogenic shock in approximately 10% of patients who develop severe hemodynamic instability in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Patients with mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock have about a 50% hospital mortality. Elimination of mitral regurgitation in these patients would be of significant benefit. Unfortunately, however, patients with acute mitral regurgitation complicating acute myocardial infarction are particularly high-risk surgical candidates, and are therefore not good candidates for a traditional annuloplasty procedure. Thus, a minimally invasive means to effect a temporary reduction or elimination of mitral regurgitation in these critically ill patients would afford them the time to recover from the myocardial infarction or other acute life-threatening events and make them better candidates for medical, interventional or surgical therapy.
A less invasive means to reduce mitral regurgitation would also be an attractive alternative for patients needing to undergo any of the following procedures: (a) isolated mitral valve repair, (b) multiple valve procedures, (c) mitral repair and coronary artery bypass, (d) mitral valve repair and other surgical procedure, or (e) mitral valve repair and an interventional cardiac procedure.
As a result, one object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for treating mitral regurgitation which does not suffer from the disadvantages associated with conventional annuloplasty.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for treating mitral regurgitation which can be deployed either permanently (e.g., for patients suffering from heart failure) or temporarily (e.g., for patients suffering from mitral regurgitation with acute myocardial infarction).
Another object of the present invention is to provide a minimally invasive method and apparatus for the repair of heart valves to improve their function.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for the repair of the mitral valve that eliminates the need for cardiopulmonary bypass and/or cardiac arrest and/or general anesthesia.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for the repair of the mitral valve that facilitates the use of smaller incisions.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus to effect a change in the geometry of the annulus of the mitral valve that increases mitral leaflet coaptation and reduces mitral valve regurgitation.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus to effect a change in the geometry of the left atrium that increases mitral leaflet coaptation and reduces mitral regurgitation.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus that is anchored partially or wholly outside the coronary sinus such that tension can be created between the proximal and distal anchored points so as to move these two points closer together and thereby effect a favorable change in the geometry of the mitral valve annulus.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus that is anchored partially or wholly outside the coronary sinus such that tension can be created between the proximal and distal anchored points so as to move these two points closer together and thereby effect a favorable change in left atrial geometry, with minimal, if any, trauma to the blood vessel.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus to alter the geometry of the mitral valve annulus such that (1) the distance between the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets is shortened; and (2) the coronary sinus assumes a more straight course.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus to alter left atrial geometry such that (1) the distance between the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets is shortened; and (2) the coronary sinus assumes a more straight course.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for altering the geometry of the mitral valve annulus in an adjustable and/or reversible fashion such that the effect on mitral valve function can be adjusted so as to achieve the best possible result.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for altering left atrial geometry in an adjustable and/or reversible fashion such that the effect on mitral valve function can be adjusted so as to achieve the best possible result.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus that is anchored partially or wholly outside the coronary sinus such that a greater geometric change in the left atrium can be created (that in turn increases mitral leaflet coaptation and reduces mitral regurgitation) when compared to anchoring only within the coronary sinus.
These and other objects are addressed by the present invention, which is made possible by the discovery that the mitral annulus may be remodeled without the plication of conventional, open-surgery annuloplasty.
The present invention comprises a method and apparatus for increasing mitral leaflet coaptation without direct surgical exposure of the mitral valve via the left atrium. More particularly, the present invention comprises a method and apparatus for effecting a geometric, conformational or dimensional alteration in the annulus of the mitral valve by manipulating cardiac structures external to the left atrium and, in so doing, improving mitral valve function.
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention utilizes access obtained in part via the coronary sinus. The coronary sinus is the largest vein of the heart. During a large portion of its course in the atrioventricular groove, the coronary sinus lies directly beneath the endocardium of the left atrium and adjacent to the posterior annulus of the mitral valve. An apparatus appropriately placed into the coronary sinus will be in direct apposition to the left atrium and the posterior annulus of the mitral valve. Manipulation of such apparatus may be used to effect a geometric change in the left atrium, and hence the annulus of the mitral valve, in order to increase mitral leaflet coaptation. Preferably, the apparatus is adjustable so that its effect may be varied, at the time of the initial procedure or at a later date, so as to achieve the best possible result.
In one preferred form of the invention, the apparatus comprises a distal anchor, a proximal anchor and a flexible filament extending therebetween. By setting the distal anchor distally, near the end of the coronary sinus, and setting the proximal anchor proximally, near the mouth of the coronary sinus, and thereafter adjustably cinching the filament between the two anchors, the geometry of the coronary sinus, and hence the geometry of the left atrium and the mitral valve, may be adjusted so as to improve mitral leaflet coaptation. The effects of this left atrial conformational change include (1) decreasing the distance between the anterior and posterior leaflets of the mitral valve; (2) straightening the posterior mitral valve annulus; and (3) decreasing the distance between the fibrous trigones of the heart by altering the shape of the mitral valve annulus.
Access to perform this procedure may be obtained either percutaneously via any vessel in the body or via a chamber of the heart, such as the right atrium. The latter approach may involve a chest wall incision or a thoracoscopic approach. Visualization of the procedure may be obtained by fluoroscopy, echocardiography, intravascular ultrasound, angioscopy, or real-time magnetic resonance imaging. It is anticipated that assessment of the efficacy of the procedure will be obtained with echocardiography, although other imaging modalities may also be suitable.
The above and other objects and features of the present invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further wherein:
The coronary sinus is the largest vein in the human heart. During a large portion of its course in the atrioventricular groove, the coronary sinus typically extends adjacent to the left atrium of the heart for a distance of approximately 5 to 10 centimeters. Significantly, for a portion of its length, e.g., typically approximately 7-9 cm, the coronary sinus extends substantially adjacent to the posterior perimeter of the mitral annulus. The present invention takes advantage of this fact. More particularly, by deploying an appropriate apparatus in the coronary sinus, adjacent to the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve, pressure may be brought to bear on the posterior annulus of the mitral valve, whereby to move the posterior annulus anteriorly so as to improve leaflet coaptation and, as a result, reduce mitral regurgitation. In this respect it should be appreciated that the posterior annulus may be shifted anteriorly so as to achieve, or to attempt to achieve to the extent anatomically possible, leaflet-to-leaflet engagement or leaflet-to-annulus engagement (e.g., where a leaflet may be tethered due to left ventricular distortion). Both of these types of engagement, or targeted engagement, are intended to be encompassed by the terms “improved leaflet coaptation” and/or “increased leaflet coaptation” and the like.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, access to the coronary sinus is gained percutaneously, e.g., the apparatus is introduced into the patient's vascular system via the jugular vein or via the left subclavian vein, passed down the superior vena cava, passed through the right atrium and then passed into the coronary sinus, where it is deployed. Alternatively, the apparatus may be introduced into the coronary sinus through a small incision in the heart, or through some other incision into the patient's vascular system.
Once deployed, the apparatus may be left in position permanently (e.g., in the case of patients suffering from mitral regurgitation associated with heart failure) or the elongated body may be left in position only temporarily (e.g., in the case of patients suffering from mitral regurgitation associated with acute myocardial infarction).
Visualization of the procedure may be obtained by fluoroscopy, echocardiography, intravascular ultrasound, angioscopy, real-time magnetic resonance imaging, etc. The efficacy of the procedure may be determined through echocardiography, although other imaging modalities may also be suitable.
Looking now at
As seen in
Looking next at
Guidewire 103 comprises a flexible body 112 having a distal end 115 and a proximal end 118. The distal end 115 of guidewire 103 preferably includes a sharp tip 121 for allowing the distal end of guidewire 103 to penetrate tissue.
Cinching device 106 comprises a flexible body or filament 124 having a distal end 127 and a proximal end 130. In the case where central lumen 136 extends from distal end 127 to proximal end 130, central lumen 136 would preferably collapse on itself when guidewire 103 is removed or a portion of guidewire 103 would remain within central lumen 136 to prevent blood from the right atrium from bleeding into the pericardial space 51. See
Delivery catheter 109 comprises a flexible body 148 having a distal end 151 and a proximal end 154. A central lumen 157 extends down the length of flexible body 148.
System 100 may be used as follows to reduce mitral regurgitation.
First, using devices and method currently well known to interventional cardiologists any commercially available delivery catheter is passed down the jugular vein 18 (or the left subclavian vein 15) of a patient, down superior vena cava 9, through right atrium 24 of the heart, and then into coronary sinus 30. When the tip of the commercially available delivery catheter is located at or near the entrance of the AIV, guidewire 103 is passed down the center of catheter 109. It will be appreciated that as the commercially available delivery catheter and flexible guidewire 103 are passed down coronary sinus 30, the catheter and guidewire will tend to assume the natural curved shape of the coronary sinus, due to the flexible nature of the catheter and guidewire. Then the guidewire's sharp tip 121 is pushed through the end wall 31 of the coronary sinus, across the intervening tissue 48 and into pericardial space 51 and the commercially available delivery catheter is removed leaving the flexible guidewire 103 in place. See FIG. 4.
Next, cinching device 106 and delivery catheter 109 are passed down over the guidewire 103 until the distal end of the delivery catheter is positioned in coronary sinus 30. See FIG. 5. More particularly, cinching device 106, with its distal anchor 139 and head 146 of proximal anchor 142 in folded back positions, is loaded into the interior lumen 157 of delivery catheter 109, and then the assembly is fit over guidewire 103, with guidewire 103 being received in central lumen 136 of cinching device 106. Cinching device 106 and delivery catheter 109 are passed down guidewire 103, together, in this position. Again, it will be appreciated that as the cinching device 106 and flexible delivery catheter 109 pass down the coronary sinus, the cinching device and delivery catheter will tend to assume the natural curved shape of the coronary sinus, due to the flexible natures of the cinching device and the delivery catheter.
Then, with the distal end 151 of delivery catheter 109 positioned at the far end 31 of the coronary sinus, the distal end of cinching device 106 is advanced forward, through intervening tissue 48, until it enters pericardial space 51. See FIG. 6. At this point the distal anchor 139 of cinching device 106 deploys. See FIG. 7.
Next, delivery catheter 109 is withdrawn proximally until it's distal end is disposed proximally of the cinching device's proximal anchor 142, whereupon head 146 of the proximal anchor 142 will unfold. See FIG. 8.
Next, the cinching device's head 146 is advanced distally, over ratcheting projections 145, until head 146 engages the coronary ostium 27. Then the proximal end of flexible body 124 is withdrawn proximally, causing the distance between distal anchor 139 and proximal anchor 142 to be reduced, whereby to cause at least a portion of coronary sinus 30 to assume a more straight configuration adjacent to the posterior annulus of mitral valve 36. See FIG. 9. This action causes the posterior annulus of mitral valve 36 to be forced anteriorly, whereby the mitral valve's posterior leaflet 39 will also move anteriorly so as to improve mitral valve leaflet coaptation and thereby reduce (or completely eliminate) mitral valve regurgitation. In this respect it should be appreciated that the posterior annulus may be shifted anteriorly so as to achieve, or to attempt to achieve to the extent anatomically possible, leaflet-to-leaflet engagement or leaflet-to-annulus engagement (e.g., where a leaflet may be tethered due to left ventricular distortion). Both of these types of engagement, or targeted engagement, are intended to be encompassed by the terms “improved leaflet coaptation” and/or “increased leaflet coaptation” and the like. Using standard visualization means (e.g. echocardiography or fluoroscopy), the degree of cinching is adjusted (i.e., either tighter or looser) so as to reduce (or completely eliminate) regurgitation in mitral valve 36.
It should be appreciated that when the cinching device's head 146 is in engagement with coronary ostium 27, blood will be free to flow into the coronary ostium due to the presence of holes H in head 146.
At this point the cinching device 106 is locked in position.
System 100 is left in this position until it is no longer needed. In some cases this may mean that system 100 is left in position for a period of a few hours, days or weeks; in other cases system 100 may be substantially permanent. If system 100 is to be left in position, the proximal end of flexible body 124 may be cut away and removed. See FIG. 10. This may be done with an instrument advanced down delivery catheter 109. Then delivery catheter 109 is removed from the patient.
Thus it will be seen that with the present invention, cinching device 106 is positioned in the normally curved portion of the coronary sinus adjacent to the mitral valve's posterior leaflet, with its distal anchor 139 located in pericardial space 51 and its proximal anchor 142 located at the coronary ostium 27. By properly cinching the length of filament 124 between these two anchors, cinching device 106 will cause at least a portion of the coronary sinus to assume a more straight configuration adjacent to the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve. This action will in turn drive the posterior annulus of the mitral valve anteriorly, so as to improve leaflet coaptation and thereby reduce mitral regurgitation. Thus, by inserting the cinching device 106 into the coronary sinus adjacent to the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve and thereafter cinching it down as appropriate, the annulus of the mitral valve is effectively manipulated so that it will assume an increased radius of curvature.
It has also been found that by inserting the cinching device into the coronary sinus adjacent to the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve, the left ventricle may also be remodeled so as to help alleviate congestive heart failure.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the delivery catheter 109 is itself guided into coronary sinus 30 without the use of guidewire 103, and the distal end of cinching device 106 is used to open a path through intervening tissue 48 and into pericardial space 51. In this form of the invention, guidewire 103 may be omitted entirely, and the central lumen 136 in cinching device 106 may also be omitted. However, the distal end of cinching device 106 preferably has a trocar device to help open a path through intervening tissue 48. See, for example,
And in another alternative embodiment of the invention, the cinching device's distal anchor 139 and/or its proximal anchor 142 may be replaced with an inflatable balloon anchor. In this case delivery catheter 109 may be adapted so that it is itself guided into coronary sinus 30 without the use of guidewire 103, and the central lumen 136 of cinching device 106 may be used as an inflation lumen. See, for example,
In the procedures described above, the distal end of cinching device 106 (and, depending on the embodiment, the distal end of guidewire 103) is described as penetrating all the way through the intervening tissue 48 and into pericardial space 51, so that the distal anchor 139 can be set into pericardial space 51 and bear against the exterior of intervening tissue 48. This arrangement is generally preferred, since it allows greater separation between distal anchor 139 and proximal anchor 142, and since it allows a strong anchoring arrangement highly resistant to slippage. However, if desired, and referring to
Similarly, in the procedures described above, the proximal anchor 142 is described as being set against coronary ostium 27. Again, this arrangement is generally preferred since it allows good anchor separation and it allows a strong anchoring arrangement highly resistant to slippage. However, if desired, it is also possible to set proximal anchor 142 at other locations.
The procedures described above relate to effecting changes in left atrial geometry using access obtained via the coronary sinus or other cardiac vein. Such procedures might also be performed using access obtained via the circumflex coronary artery. In addition, a similar approach could be used to perform procedures on the tricuspid valve.
It will be understood that the particular devices and methods embodying the invention are shown by way of illustration only and not as limitations of the invention. The principles and features of this invention may be employed in various and numerous embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.
This patent application: (1) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/068,264, filed Feb. 5, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,656,221 by Daniel C. Taylor et al. for METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; (2) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/068,700, filed Feb. 5, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,231 by William E. Cohn et al. for APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REDUCING MITRAL REGURGITATION; (3) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/090,968, filed Mar. 5, 2002 by William E. Cohn et al. for APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REDUCING MITRAL REGURGITATION; (4) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/278,153, filed Mar. 23, 2001 by William E. Cohn et al. for METHOD AND APPARATUS TO IMPROVE MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; (5) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/279,974, filed Mar. 29, 2001 by Daniel C. Taylor et al. for METHOD AND APPARATUS TO IMPROVE MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; (6) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/280,038, filed Mar. 30, 2001 by William E. Cohn et al. for METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT IN MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; (7) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/279,973, filed Mar. 29, 2001 by Daniel C. Taylor et al. for METHODS AND DEVICES TO IMPROVE MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; (8) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/283,820, filed Apr. 13, 2001 by William E. Cohn et al. for METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT IN MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; (9) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/312,217, filed Aug. 14, 2001 by Daniel C. Taylor et al. for METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT IN MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; (10) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/339,481, filed Oct. 26, 2001 by William E. Cohn et al. for TRANSVASCULAR APPROACH TO MITRAL VALVE PROCEDURES; and (11) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/348,424, filed Jan. 14, 2002 by Daniel C. Taylor et al. for METHOD AND APPARATUS TO IMPROVE MITRAL VALVE FUNCTION; The aforementioned eleven (11) patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4669473 | Richards et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4917698 | Carpentier et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4944745 | Sogard et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5061277 | Carpentier et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5092889 | Campbell, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5269809 | Hayhurst et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5383892 | Cardon et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389091 | Moorehead | Feb 1995 | A |
5443481 | Lee | Aug 1995 | A |
5476506 | Lunn | Dec 1995 | A |
5545209 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569198 | Racchini | Oct 1996 | A |
5569201 | Burns | Oct 1996 | A |
5575799 | Bolanos et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5720726 | Marcadis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5755778 | Kleshinski | May 1998 | A |
5755781 | Jayaraman | May 1998 | A |
5800495 | Machek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800526 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5855565 | Bar-Cohen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980570 | Simpson | Nov 1999 | A |
5984917 | Fleischman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6033436 | Steinke et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051020 | Goicoechea et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6071263 | Kirkman | Jun 2000 | A |
6086599 | Lee et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090136 | McDonald et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119037 | Kellogg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6162245 | Jayaraman | Dec 2000 | A |
6165194 | Denardo | Dec 2000 | A |
6187040 | Wright | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210432 | Solem et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241746 | Bosma et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258117 | Camrud et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277107 | Lurie et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328765 | Hardwick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332896 | Hubbard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6402781 | Langberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419696 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6537314 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6585716 | Altman | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602288 | Cosgrove et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6656221 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
20010018611 | Solem et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010044568 | Langberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052345 | Niazi | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016628 | Langberg et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020087173 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103532 | Langberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103533 | Langberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151961 | Lashinsi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169502 | Mathis | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169504 | Alferness et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030069636 | Solem et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083538 | Adams et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093148 | Bolling et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105520 | Alferness et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0756853 | Feb 1997 | EP |
409322936 | Dec 1997 | JP |
WO 0100111 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0154618 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 02053206 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02060352 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02062270 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02091908 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02100240 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03037171 | May 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020183841 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60278153 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60279974 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60280038 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60279973 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60283820 | Apr 2001 | US | |
60312217 | Aug 2001 | US | |
60339481 | Oct 2001 | US | |
60348424 | Jan 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10090968 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10104720 | US | |
Parent | 10068264 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10090968 | US | |
Parent | 10068700 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10068264 | US |