The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for the reduction of noise transmission through glass (including but not limited to windows and windshields) and into interior spaces (including but not limited to houses, vehicle cabins, fuselages, locomotive cabins and train coaches, boat cabins, buildings, rooms, spaces, apartments, hotels, airports, and other interior spaces having windows). For the purposes of the present invention, the term “window” is intended to mean, where the context so admits, windows, windshields, glass-containing doors and ceilings and skylights, transparent or translucent panels, and the like. And for the purposes of the present invention, the term “glass” is intended to mean, where the context so admits, glass, plexiglass, transparent or translucent plastics, and the like.
The present invention also relates to the creation and use of rating systems for evaluating the propagation of sound through glass (e.g., an A-Rating™ and an S-Rating™), including but not limited to windows and windshields.
The A-Rating™ is for low frequency sound (preferably from 20 to 200 Hz) just inside the glass window/windshield. The S-Rating™ is for broadband frequency sound (preferably throughout the entire hearing range of 20 to 20,000 Hz).
Typically, low frequency sound dominates noise propagation into interior spaces and is more difficult and costly to reduce. This invention focuses primarily on reducing low-frequency noise levels, and thus, increasing the A-Rating™ of the glass.
Noise transmission into the interior of buildings, houses, vehicle cabins, fuselages, and other interior spaces has existed throughout human history. Reducing noise transmission for better sound quality helps enhance health, prevent sleep interference and prevent speech interference. Reducing noise transmission into enclosures can also be important for protecting people from hearing loss and complying with standards prescribed by regulators, e.g., the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
Previous noise reduction techniques for glass, including but not limited to windows and windshields, have predominantly consisted of reducing the noise by a limited number of decibels over the entire hearing range (20-20,000 Hz). However, this approach typically affords little reduction in the overall noise levels, let alone low frequency noise from 20 to 200 Hz.
As seen in
Looking next at
Moreover, the building and construction industry utilizes R-values to rate the temperature energy efficiency of a window in relation to an interior space. The higher the R-value of the window, the higher the energy efficiency of the window. In the summer, a window with a high R-value allows less warm air to penetrate into the interior of the structure and thus helps to sustain a cool interior temperature for better energy efficiency. Similarly, in the winter, a high R-value allows less warm air to escape from a house or building, thereby helping to sustain a warm temperature for better energy efficiency.
Some glass (e.g., windows and windshields) can be modally sparse and some can be modally dense. Modally dense glass elements can typically be defined as elements that vibrate with modes (or resonant frequencies) separated by less than 40 Hz in a low frequency bandwidth between 20 and 200 Hz. In modally sparse glass elements, only one resonant frequency may be present, or two (or only a few) resonant frequencies may be present. The vibration at these resonant peaks is reduced and thus the majority of the energy is attenuated. Mass, stiffness, and damping is applied to these few peaks and noise transmission mitigated. For modally dense glass elements, many different mass, spring or damping systems can be utilized to reduce overall energy across a frequency spectrum (e.g., 20 to 200 Hz for low frequency systems and 20 to 20,000 Hz for systems of the full human hearing range).
Many types of noise can awaken people at night, distract from daily life, and affect health. For houses near busy streets, low frequency engine noise from cars, motorcycles, construction vehicles, etc. can penetrate into the interior of enclosures and awaken residents, especially when engines are revved late at night. For buildings near airports, noise from aircraft, typically in the form of blade-passage-frequency (BPF) noise, can transmit into the interior of the building. Construction next to a restaurant can make it difficult to maintain a conversation inside. Similarly, when a subway or train comes to a screeching halt, it can be nearly impossible to maintain a conversation in the interior of the car because of the brake noise. Moreover, when one is inside a vehicle and an adjacent automobile is blaring music with high bass, it can distract from the acoustics of the environment.
The present invention helps to reduce noise transmission through glass (e.g., windows and windshields) utilizing mass, stiffness, and damping characteristics (sometimes hereinafter referred to as a “Degree-of-Freedom system” or “DOF system”) in order to obtain desired sound levels in the interior of houses, buildings, vehicle cabins, fuselages, locomotives, train coaches, subways, conference rooms, libraries, hotels, laboratories, and other similar interiors. As mentioned above, previous methods have predominantly concentrated on utilizing damping alone, or stiffness alone, to improve sound quality. What is unique about this invention is that glass (e.g., windows and windshields) is attenuated by a novel attenuator taking into account all three of mass, stiffness, and damping. If a particular window has sharp resonant peaks, with little damping, the novel attenuator can have little damping and concentrate mainly on the mass and stiffness to cancel the energy at particular resonances.
With the present invention, the novel attenuator effectively creates an “anti-resonance” at an appropriate frequency attenuation bandwidth to cancel an undesirable resonant peak sound transmission.
In other words, the novel attenuator of the present invention utilizes the elastic element of the attenuator, and the mass element of the attenuator, to provide natural mode(s) of vibration (in essence, “anti-resonance”) that counteracts the undesirable resonant peak(s) in the window. With a 1-DOF attenuator, the attenuator creates one natural mode (i.e., one frequency attenuation bandwidth) that counteracts one undesirable resonant peak in the window; with a 2-DOF attenuator, the attenuator creates two natural modes (i.e., two frequency attenuation bandwidths) that counteract two resonant peaks in the window, etc.
To those familiar with the art, the amount of damping for a peak can be described with a Q-factor. The higher the Q-factor, the less the damping in the peak (i.e., width of the peak is narrower). Similarly, the lower the Q-factor, the higher the damping in the peak (i.e., width of the peak is wider). However, the uniqueness of this invention (sometimes referred to herein as a novel attenuator) is that the majority of the energy cancellation concentrates on the resonant peaks, which is where the majority of the unhealthy and/or undesirable noise is concentrated. Previous systems, which concentrate on damping, reduce the majority of energy at frequencies outside the resonant peaks. Thus, these previous systems reduce sound which is not bothersome to the human health condition rather than attenuating noise that can be detrimental to one's health.
A damping method or air-gap method can reduce some energy at a resonant peak, but it is very little compared to a system which concentrates on reducing energy at particular resonant peak(s) (i.e., the approach used in the present invention). In a system that concentrates on reducing energy at a particular resonant peak (i.e., the approach used in the present invention), there is typically an order of magnitude or more in sound reduction (which is a massive amount of energy reduction compared to a conventional method).
For instance, the plot in
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an A-Rating™ system, wherein attenuated and unattenuated windows can be defined and/or rated for the building and construction industry. Houses, lodging establishments, buildings, etc. could be subjected to construction and/or other codes which would recommend or require that the structures include windows with an appropriate A-Rating™ so as to provide for appropriate and/or desirable interior sound levels.
The majority of unwanted noise occurs in the low frequency region (e.g. 20 to 200 Hz). This noise can be more difficult and costly to attenuate, so finding a cost-effective means to attenuate noise in this frequency region would be beneficial. The present invention concentrates on energy levels in this frequency range, however, the present invention also contemplates providing noise attenuation for the entire human hearing range of 20 to 20,000 Hz for an interior space.
Accordingly, an alternative S-Rating™ system is contemplated for defining and rating noise attenuation for a full human hearing frequency spectrum. Table 1 (see below) shows an A-Rating™ scale as well as an S-Rating™ scale. Depending on the applicable local, regional, state, or federal regulation(s), attenuated and unattenuated levels/ratings can be established for a particular structure in a particular area for use by the construction industry.
By way of example, in an area where noise levels are particularly high, such as near an airport, airport windows or building windows nearby might need to be equipped with a window of at least an A-8 rating (i.e., a window having the “A-8” characteristics shown in Table 1). In a quieter community, with little noise, a window with an A-3 rating (i.e., a window having the “A-3” characteristics shown in Table 1) might only be needed. For a house on a busy street, with high volumes of vehicle traffic, a window with an A-6 rating (i.e., a window having the “A-6” characteristics shown in Table 1) might be necessary.
In addition, although it would be rare, there might be a need to enhance and/or amplify sound into a particular enclosure. The regulatory agencies could set the attenuated/unattenuated limits required for a particular area in accordance with the A-Rating™ and S-Rating™ scales of the present invention.
Decibel reduction is based on a test in which a microphone or multiple microphones are placed approximately 6 inches from a window. When three microphones are utilized, one should be placed towards the top of the window, one towards the middle of the window, and one towards the bottom of the window. An average sound pressure level (“SPL”) is obtained, based on the data obtained by the three microphones.
Various acoustical sources can be applied during testing. Universally, white noise at 90 dB could be directed at the window and microphone levels obtained on the other side of the window while installed with baffle-like boundary conditions for the setup to ensure the acoustical energy is being measured for energy transmitted through the window.
The testing could be completed and the rating assigned before shipping and installing the window (with attenuator) in a house, building, structure, etc. If a particular area has a certain “type” of noise (e.g., noise from particular sources that generate energy at particular frequencies), that particular “type” of noise could be applied to the window (with attenuator) during testing. By way of example but not limitation, for windows to be installed in proximity to a particular busy street that has engine noise with typical resonant peaks at 100 Hz, the novel attenuator could be constructed so as to maximize energy reduction at that particular frequency.
In the foregoing scenario, the majority of the attenuation in a 20 to 200 Hz region would be concentrated around 60 Hz. The application of the A-Rating™ scale would still require taking the average reduction over the frequency range. By way of example but not limitation, if the resonant peak was reduced 9 dB, but the overall average reduction for the frequency range was 6 dB, then the window (with attenuator) would have an A-5 rating. In another example, if the resonant peak was reduced 9 dB and the overall average reduction for the frequency range was 9 dB, then the window (with attenuator) would have an A-6 rating. Another example could be if a building is by an airport and is subjected to a typical BPF of around 85 Hz, then the novel attenuator would be constructed so as to maximize energy reduction at that particular frequency.
In the case of glass (e.g., window and windshield) manufacturing, one or more novel attenuators may be imbedded in the window, or affixed to the glass (in one form of the invention, with a covering over the top of the attenuator to prevent the attenuator from being tampered with). In the case where the attenuator(s) is/are affixed to a window, the attenuator(s) can be adhered, fixed, fastened, etc. as necessary or appropriate.
The attenuator(s) can be in various shapes, sizes, designs, etc. For aesthetic purposes, the attenuator(s) could be in the shape of various animals, objects, landmarks, structures, people, scenes, etc. to provide a decorative aspect to the window. Furthermore, the attenuators could be enhanced with various colors, artwork, painting, etc. to enhance their aesthetic appeal.
In one embodiment of the present invention, and looking now at
In practice, the novel attenuators (or neutralizers) of the 2-DOF device are preferably configured to have a shape compatible with the windshield of a particular vehicle or apparatus, e.g., windshields utilized with armored trucks, Piper 140 airplanes, and Piper Cherokee Six 260 airplanes. In this particular exemplary embodiment, the novel attenuator eliminates the energy transmitting into the interior of the fuselage at the BPF (87 Hz) and 200 Hz peaks.
In another embodiment of the present invention, and looking now at
In addition, multi-DOF attenuators having more than 3 DOFs can be designed. By way of example but not limitation, in the embodiment shown in
The aforementioned embodiments may be formed by boring out chambers in the elastic layer of the novel attenuators (i.e.,
In another embodiment of the multiple DOF attenuator, the ability of an attenuator to shift frequencies in order to tune to a particular resonant peak is possible by varying the stiffness element of the attenuator. In an embodiment with shifting stiffness characteristics of the invention, bores or chambers may be formed in the elastic layer of the attenuator and sealed. These bores or chambers can be filled with air or another gaseous mixture. The attenuator may also be provided with knobs or other valves to control closures configured to open and close so as to allow the fluid to flow from one chamber to another, or from a reservoir chamber to another chamber. By varying the amount of fluid in the chambers, the attenuator may be tuned to adjust and match the resonant frequency range of a window or windshield, thereby creating an anti-resonance to help maximize attenuation at particular frequency ranges. This can allow customization and targeting of various kinds of noise resonating from a window or windshield and propagating into the interior of a particular house, building, vehicle, etc.
In still another embodiment of the present invention, the chambers can be filled with a fluid containing iron particles and a magnetic field applied to the chamber. See
In one preferred form of the invention, there is provided an attenuator for reducing sound transmission through a structure, said attenuator comprising:
at least one elastic body characterized by a damping attribute and a stiffness attribute; and
at least one mass secured to said at least one elastic body;
wherein said at least one elastic body is configured to be secured to said structure intermediate said structure and said at least one mass;
and further wherein said damping attribute of said at least one elastic body, said stiffness attribute of said at least one elastic body and said at least one mass are selected so as to provide at least one frequency attenuation bandwidth focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission through a structure.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a system for reducing sound transmission through a structure, said system comprising:
a structure; and
an attenuator attached to said structure, said attenuator comprising:
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method for reducing sound transmission through a structure, said method comprising:
attaching an attenuator to the structure, said attenuator comprising:
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided an acoustic rating system for windows based on noise amplitude and frequency.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method for characterizing a window, the method comprising:
testing the sound transmission of a window; and
characterizing the window in the context of an acoustic rating system based on noise amplitude and frequency.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts, and further wherein:
The novel attenuator of the present invention reduces noise transmission into the interior of buildings, houses, restaurants, vehicle cabins, fuselages, and other enclosures, which is an issue that has been around throughout human history. The lower sound levels in interior spaces helps to enhance health, prevent sleep interference, prevent speech interference, and helps to maintain safe sound levels that may be prescribed by EPA and OSHA standards. These are just a few of the key incentives for reducing noise pollution in interior spaces.
The novel attenuator of the present invention attenuates resonant peaks that are vibrating the glass window/windshield and propagating structure-borne noise into an interior of an enclosure.
An example of a novel attenuator that reduces noise transmission into the interior of houses, buildings, shopping stores, restaurants, hotels, apartments, libraries, museums, and any other interior enclosure can be seen in
An example of a novel attenuator system that reduces noise transmission into the interior of an airplane fuselage can be seen in
The windshield mode around 200 Hz also transmits sound energy into the cabin of the fuselage, although this sound energy is somewhat less than the fundamental BPF sound energy. This closest mode in the windshield to the second harmonic of the BPF was targeted as a second peak for noise attenuation (200 Hz).
In accordance with the present invention, 2-DOF attenuators have been designed to reduce noise transmission into the interior of the fuselage cabin at the two targeted frequencies. Attenuators 5 are adhered to trim 6 based on the design of windshields for armored trucks and other airplanes, including the Piper, as shown in
Attenuators 5 are mass/spring/damping systems that can be tuned to a frequency of attenuation in order to target bothersome resonant peaks, utilizing Equation 1, which is derived from Newton's Second Law of Motion:
where the k term in the equation represents the stiffness of the attenuator, the m term represents the mass of the attenuator, and the f term denotes the frequency of attenuation. Attenuators 5 can be a 1-DOF, 2-DOF, or 3-DOF (as shown in
The elastic layer 19 (
In designing an attenuator for the windshield mode at 80-90 Hz, ideally it would be helpful to design the mass of the attenuator to be around 4% of the total mass of the plexiglass. A mass ratio is calculated as shown in Equation 2:
A mass ratio that is greater than 4% of the entity being attenuated will begin to cause what is known (to those that are experienced in the field) as splitting of the resonant peak in the windshield into two smaller peaks, e.g., one slightly lower in frequency and one slightly higher in frequency than the initial peak. However, with the novel attenuators of the present invention, the attenuators can be tuned slightly off from one another in order to prevent peaks from occurring on each side of the original resonant peak.
In another embodiment, and looking now at
A model of the 3-DOF (in series) attenuator shown in
Noise transmission through the glass at three distinct resonant peaks is being attenuated by the attenuators shown in
In a further attenuator embodiment, a multi-DOF attenuator 18 is attached to glass 1, as shown in
In another preferred embodiment, and looking now at
The different material in each chamber can target a separate attenuation peak in order to cancel unwanted peaks of noise propagating through the glass. Moreover, by adjusting the surface contact area (between the mass and the chamber filled material 20), the peak of attenuation can be increased or decreased.
For instance, keeping mass 21 constant, if the contact area of mass 21 with the filled chamber is decreased, then the attenuation peak decreases. Similarly, if the contact area of mass 21 with the filled chamber increases, then the attenuation peak increases, as related in Equation 3:
in which SA is the contact surface area of the filled chamber, k is the stiffness of the filled chamber, and m is the mass (which could be of any metal or metal composite, including steel, aluminum, etc., rock, concrete, stone, plastic, or any other solid material). Multiple peaks of noise can then be mitigated by a multiple-DOF attenuator.
In a another preferred embodiment, as shown in
In order to decrease the pressure in the balloon/sack, and thereby decrease the frequency of the attenuation peak, valves/knobs 25 are placed on the side of the attenuator, as shown in
This enables a user to change the attenuation attributes of the attenuator in order to address a particular environment. By way of example but not limitation, if a house is on a busy street and is constantly being barraged by vehicle engine-noise of around 100 Hz, then the user can adjust one of the attenuators to address the peaks of attenuation to compensate. In another example, if an office building is near an airport and needs to tune an attenuation peak to cancel out a particular airplane BPF at 85 Hz, then the attenuator can be adjusted accordingly.
In still another preferred embodiment, and looking now at
A low-voltage battery or voltage supply is used to send a small amount of current to a particular coil when a knob is turned. Current flowing through a coil 27 will create a magnetic field, which will stiffen the MR fluid in the filled chamber (column). This in turn will increase the frequency of an attenuation peak, as needed to counteract a particular peak of noise propagating through the glass into the interior of an enclosed area.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, and looking now at
As an additional feature, and looking still at
For embodiments of the invention wherein the attenuator has multiple DOF systems, such as the embodiment shown in
In one aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel attenuator that utilizes an acoustical rating system for the levels of sound propagation through a structure. An acoustical rating system is introduced, as described in Table 1, for the building and construction industry. Just as windows and insulation have an R-value to define the temperature energy efficiency of the interior of a room, the acoustical rating system could define the acoustical energy efficiency of an enclosure space. In the summer, the higher the R-value, the less cool air that escapes a room through a window (and the less heat that penetrates into the interior of the room), thus keeping the room cooler with less energy. Similarly, in the winter, the higher the R-value, the less heat that escapes a room through the window (and the less cool air that penetrates into the interior), thus keeping the room hotter with less energy. In a similar manner, the higher the acoustical rating of a window, the less noise that propagates into the interior of an enclosure, thus maintaining lower levels of sound in the interior of an enclosure, creating a more harmonious, acoustically energy efficient room for enhanced health, preventing sleep interference, speech interference, and maintaining safety levels according to EPA and OSHA standards. An acoustical rating system can help set standards for acceptably attenuated windows for a particular area or jurisdiction for sound quality, especially low frequency noise (e.g. 20 to 200 Hz).
An approach for acoustically rating windows can be seen in Table 1. An A-Rating™ scheme is introduced as well as a S-Rating™ scheme for the sound quality of windows. The A-Rating™ scheme rates windows for low frequency sound from 20-200 Hz while the S-Rating™ scheme rates windows for sound throughout the entire human hearing range of 20-20,000 Hz for the building and construction industry. The majority of noise pollution in the US is due to low frequency noise (due to a long wavelength), which is more difficult and costly to attenuate to produce soothing, healthy, energy efficient levels.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel attenuator which offers quiet environments, minimizing noise in the interior of enclosures compared to previous devices.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel system comprising:
(a) glass, window, windshield, plexi-glass, plastic, and any other apparatus that allows visible light to penetrate through; and
(b) at least one attenuator comprising mass/spring/damping element(s) for producing peaks of attenuation on the frequency spectrum, according to Equation 3, to counteract peaks of noise propagating through glass, plexi-glass, plastic windows, windshields, or the like, into the interior of a house, building, shopping store, restaurant, vehicle-cabin, fuselage, locomotive/train/subway cabin, apartment, hotel, room, space, airport, library, museum, or any other similar enclosure, wherein the stiffness and damping characteristics are attributes of an elastic layer comprising foam, gel, sand, rubber, polymer, or any other substance of elastic form, and the mass characteristics are attributes of a mass layer comprising a metal, including steel, aluminum, or any other metal composite, rock, stone, concrete, brick, plastic, or any other material of a fixed, solid-state. Optionally, the system further comprises trim(s), as shown in
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel attenuator which comprises a multi-DOF attenuator that can be attached to the glass structure, as shown in
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel attenuator which comprises an elastic layer wherein chambers are bored out of the elastic layer in the form of a cylinder, square/rectangular box, or any other volumetric shape. The chambers can then be filled with a different material such as foam, gel, sand, liquid, or any other substance to which a mass can be adhered, fastened, bolted, cemented, secured or placed into communication with in any way to the material. Each filled chamber (column) can have a unique “buoyancy” (with different stiffness characteristics) in order to create peaks of attenuation at different frequencies to cancel peaks of noise propagating through the glass window/windshield.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel attenuator in which the chamber(s) of the attenuator(s) are filled with bags/balloons of air or any other gas mixture and attached to separate distinct masses, as shown in
(a) plastic tubing that goes from the bags/balloons to rubber bulbs on the side of the attenuator;
(b) rubber bulbs that connect to the plastic tubing that can be squeezed to increase the pressure of a particular filled chamber (column) of air/gas-mixture—as the pressure increases, the stiffness increases, which increases the attenuation peak; and
(c) knobs that connect to plastic tubing that connect to the chambers of air/gas-mixture—by turning a knob, pressure can be released from a particular bag/balloon of air/gas-mixture in a chamber, which decreases the frequency of the attenuation peak.
The ability to shift attenuation peak(s) enables a user to change the attenuation attributes of the attenuator for a particular environment. If a house is on a busy street, constantly being barraged by vehicle traffic, in which engine-noise around 100 Hz is the primary acoustic energy propagating through the window, then the user can adjust one of the peaks of attenuation to compensate and counteract the noise. Similarly, if an office building is near an airport and needs to tune an attenuation peak to cancel out a particular airplane BPF (e.g. around 85 Hz), then the attenuator can be adjusted accordingly.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel attenuator such as can be seen in
(a) the chambers are lined with a liner (preferably a plastic liner) and filled with a high viscosity magnetorheological (MR) fluid;
(b) coils are wrapped around the filled chambers (columns);
(c) wires are connected to the coils; and
(d) knobs on the side of the attenuator connect to the wires coming from the coil(s) and can increase, decrease, or turn off current being supplied to the coil(s).
A low-voltage battery or voltage supply would be needed for the knobs to be able to increase, decrease, or turn off current to a particular coil when a knob is turned. Current, when flowing through the coil, will create a magnetic field, which can stiffen the MR fluid in the chambers with an increase in current. This in turn will increase the frequency of an attenuation peak, as needed to counteract a particular peak of noise propagating through the glass into the interior of an enclosed area.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a novel attenuator with one or more DOFs, each of which is configured to automatically adjust the attenuator for a particular attenuation peak (see
For embodiments with many DOF systems, like the one shown in
Thus it will be seen that, in one form of the invention, there is provided an attenuator for reducing sound transmission through a window, the attenuator comprising:
at least one elastic body characterized by a damping attribute and a stiffness attribute; and
at least one mass secured to the at least one elastic body;
wherein the at least one elastic body is configured to be secured to the window intermediate the window and the at least one mass;
and further wherein the damping attribute of the at least one elastic body, the stiffness attribute of the at least one elastic body and the at least one mass are selected so as to provide at least one frequency attenuation bandwidth focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission through the window. With this form of the invention, the attenuator provides one or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 1-DOF attenuator, a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
In one preferred form of the invention, the damping attribute of the at least one elastic body, the stiffness attribute of the at least one elastic body and the at least one mass are selected so as to provide at least two frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission through the window. With this form of the invention, the attenuator provides two or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, the attenuator comprises a first elastic body characterized by a first damping attribute and a first stiffness attribute, a second elastic body characterized by a second damping attribute and a second stiffness attribute, a first mass and a second mass, wherein the first elastic body is configured to be secured to the window intermediate window and the first mass, and further wherein the second elastic body is configured to be secured to the first mass intermediate the first mass and the second mass. With this form of the invention, the attenuator provides its elastic bodies and masses in series, whereby to provide two or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, the attenuator comprises a first elastic body characterized by a first damping attribute and a first stiffness attribute, a second elastic body characterized by a second damping attribute and a second stiffness attribute, and a third elastic body characterized by a third damping attribute and a third stiffness, a first mass, a second mass and a third mass, wherein the first elastic body is configured to be secured to the window intermediate the window and the first mass, second elastic body is configured to be secured to the first mass intermediate the first mass and the second mass, and the third elastic body is configured to be secured to the second mass intermediate the second mass and the third mass. With this form of the invention, the attenuator provides its elastic bodies and masses in series, whereby to provide three or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 3-DOF attenuator, a 4-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, the attenuator comprises at least one chamber formed in the at least one elastic body, wherein a material is disposed within the at least one chamber. With this form of the invention, the attenuator provides one or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 1-DOF attenuator, a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, the material filling the at least one chamber of the attenuator comprises a fluid, and the attenuator comprises means for varying the quantity of fluid disposed within said chamber, such that the attenuator provides one or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 1-DOF attenuator, a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, the material filling the at least one chamber of the attenuator comprises a magnetorheological (MR) fluid, and the attenuator comprises means for creating a magnetic field around the at least one chamber so as to reduce the flowability of the material filling the at least one chamber, such that the attenuator provides one or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 1-DOF attenuator, a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, a feedback loop control system may be used to automatically adjust the magnetic field around the at least one chamber so as to provide one or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 1-DOF attenuator, a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, there is provided a system for reducing sound transmission through a window, the system comprising:
a window; and
an attenuator attached to the window, the attenuator comprising:
and further wherein the damping attribute of the at least one elastic body, the stiffness attribute of the at least one elastic body and the at least one mass are selected so as to provide at least one frequency attenuation bandwidth focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission through the window. With this form of the invention, the attenuator provides one or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 1-DOF attenuator, a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
And in one preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method for reducing sound transmission through a window, the method comprising:
attaching an attenuator to the window, the attenuator comprising:
and further wherein the damping attribute of the at least one elastic body, the stiffness attribute of the at least one elastic body and the at least one mass are selected so as to provide at least one frequency attenuation bandwidth focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission through the window. With this form of the invention, the attenuator provides one or more frequency attenuation bandwidths each focused on a single resonant peak of sound transmission (i.e., the attenuator may be characterized as a 1-DOF attenuator, a 2-DOF attenuator, a 3-DOF attenuator, etc.). See, for example,
It should be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangements of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the present invention, may be made by those skilled in the art while still remaining within the principles and scope of the invention.
This patent application claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/045,594, filed Sep. 4, 2014 by Grant Nash for BEARABLEGLASS/WINDOW/WINDSHIELD™ (BEARABLES™) FOR REDUCING NOISE LEVELS IN INTERIOR OF BUILDINGS, HOUSES, SHOPPING STORES, RESTAURANTS, VEHICLE-CABINS, FUSELAGE CABINS, LOCOMOTIVE/TRAIN/SUBWAY CABINS, HOTELS, APARTMENTS, AIRPORTS, LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS, AND ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENCLOSURE, WITH AN A-RATING™ AND S-RATING™ FOR BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION CODES, which patent application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2379194 | Shonts et al. | Jun 1945 | A |
2409808 | Sowle | Oct 1946 | A |
2444976 | Brown | Jul 1948 | A |
2473616 | Stephenson | Jun 1949 | A |
2912724 | Wilkes | Nov 1959 | A |
3191240 | Slaman et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3343317 | Cripe | Sep 1967 | A |
3429530 | Hertel | Feb 1969 | A |
3553913 | Eisenberg | Jan 1971 | A |
3953630 | Roberts et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4114342 | Okawa | Sep 1978 | A |
4316404 | Medlin | Feb 1982 | A |
4333292 | Musgrave | Jun 1982 | A |
4456335 | Mumford | Jun 1984 | A |
4460314 | Fuller | Jul 1984 | A |
4622249 | Bowser | Nov 1986 | A |
4776763 | Light | Oct 1988 | A |
4829729 | Derner et al. | May 1989 | A |
4932608 | Heidish et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941302 | Barry | Jul 1990 | A |
5005557 | Bachli | Apr 1991 | A |
5009218 | Bachli | Apr 1991 | A |
5119608 | Glover et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5120584 | Ohlenforst et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5154953 | De Moncuit et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5169694 | Endo et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5227206 | Bachli | Jul 1993 | A |
5232344 | El-aini | Aug 1993 | A |
5255473 | Kaspar et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
2713581 | Irish | Dec 1993 | A |
5343619 | Lardellier | Sep 1994 | A |
5407321 | Rimkunas et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5584662 | Mannava et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5636484 | DeBlock | Jun 1997 | A |
5732517 | Milikovsky | Mar 1998 | A |
5766755 | Chaussade et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5820343 | Kraft et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820348 | Fricke | Oct 1998 | A |
5846057 | Ferrigno et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6155789 | Mannava et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6199933 | Gielda | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203269 | Lorber et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224339 | Rhodes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6224341 | Fricke | May 2001 | B1 |
6238187 | Dulaney et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260317 | Fisher | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6328532 | Hahnle | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6514040 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6787204 | Chaussade et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793990 | Sakaguchi et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802162 | Fisher | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6830791 | Misonou et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6886297 | Crandell | May 2005 | B1 |
6905094 | Dazet et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7249653 | Sheng | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7266930 | Fisher | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7395898 | Yang | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7552896 | Coak | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7721844 | Lewis et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7763334 | Berkowitz | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7845142 | Theios | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7856770 | Grassmuck et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8033505 | Wieting | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8082707 | Lewis et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8439154 | Lewis et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8550206 | Keady | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8616330 | McKnight | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8857563 | Chang | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8857564 | Ma | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8869933 | McKnight | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9270253 | Chang | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20030234322 | Bladt et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040238690 | Wood et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060118676 | Novak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070069080 | Rassaian et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070148379 | Theias et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20120094084 | Fisher | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20160027427 | Yang | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0047725 | Mar 1982 | EP |
889568 | Jan 1943 | FR |
2026622 | Feb 1980 | GB |
S61181794 | Aug 1986 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160071505 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62045594 | Sep 2014 | US |