As is known in the art, phased array radars have a number of advantages over other types of radar systems while having certain potential disadvantages, such as high cost and complexity. One issue that may arise in very large limited scan phased arrays is the increase in peak sidelobe levels due to amplitude taper quantization effects and the grating lobes of a super-element lattice driven by finite instantaneous bandwidth. Grating lobes can also be driven by the super-element non-uniform illumination taper. As is known in the art, super-elements contain a number of radiating elements coupled to a common transmission line or RF feed. This can be realized in a number of topologies, including configurations of waveguides with slot radiators, configurations of radiators fed by stripline feeds, and configurations of oversized (>λ/2) waveguide radiators. Another issue with increasing the length of super-elements is an increase in scan loss, or a reduction in scan volume due to the larger size super-elements.
The present invention provides methods and apparatus for a phased array radar having columns of super-element array radiators that are randomized with respect to location along the column length. In one particular embodiment, each column includes regularly spaced super-elements, and each column is offset from its adjacent columns in the direction of the column by a random distance. With this arrangement, sidelobes can be suppressed without the need to implement multiple size super-elements or subarrays and without the need to further reduce super-element size and increase array costs. In another embodiment, super-element radiators include randomization of super-element length by a predetermined amount, such as ten percent. Randomizing super-element location has minimal effect on array cost and no effect on the array electronics and/or beamformer.
In one aspect of the invention, a phased array radar system comprises: an array comprising columns of super-elements containing radiator elements located along a length of the super-element, wherein the super-elements form the columns such that super-elements are arranged end-to-end, wherein the super-elements are arranged in the column at randomized locations to reduce sidelobes.
The system can further include one or more of the following features: the super-element length is constant for at least part of the array, the column-to-column spacing is constant for at least part of the array, the array is elliptically symmetric, the length of the super-elements is randomized, the length of the super-elements is randomized to a selected granularity, and the length of a first super-element is selected and a length of a second super-element is varied by a first amount added or subtracted from the length of the first super-element,
In another aspect of the invention, a phased array radar system comprises: an array comprising columns of super-elements containing radiator elements located along a length of the super-element, wherein the super-elements form the columns such that the super-elements are arranged end-to-end, wherein the length of the super-elements is randomized to reduce sidelobes.
In a further aspect of the invention, a method comprises providing an array including columns of super-elements containing radiator elements located along a length of the super-element, wherein the super-elements form the columns such that super-elements are arranged end-to-end, and arranging the super-elements the columns at randomized locations to reduce sidelobes.
The method can further include one or more of the following features: the super-element length is constant for at least part of the array, the column-to-column spacing is constant for at least part of the array, the array is elliptically symmetric, the length of the super-elements is randomized, the length of the super-elements is randomized to a selected granularity, and the length of a first super-element is selected and a length of a second super-element is varied by a first amount added or subtracted from the length of the first super-element.
The foregoing features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings in which:
In an exemplary embodiment, the transmit aperture 102 and separate receive aperture 104 are sized to enable the radar system to track targets from 100 km to 42,000 km in altitude. In one particular embodiment, the system includes a transmit aperture of about 200 m by 14 m and a receive aperture of about 215 m by 27 m, both of which can be elliptical. The challenges associated with a phased array of this size in performance, cost, module count, and complexity, will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Before describing in detail exemplary embodiments of the inventive super-element radiator location randomization to reduce sidelobes, some information is provided. As is known in the art, a super-element radiator comprises a number of individual radiator elements coupled to a common transmission line.
In an exemplary large radar aperture, super-elements are formed from slotted waveguide arrays, which are spaced side-to-side by approximately λ/2, but which have a length much greater than λ (wavelength). In this long dimension, grating lobes appear in the far field patterns due to quantization effects in the aperture taper. A uniform illumination along each super-element is assumed. Also, as the array is scanned, grating lobes can be formed when the instantaneous frequency is different than the frequency at which the array is steered. Since the latter effect may be larger than the former, focus is directed to these frequency-driven grating lobes or sidelobes and non-uniform illumination taper.
For the illustrative slotted waveguide super-element, the pattern of each super-element scans with frequency. The array pattern, or array factor of super-elements, is formed by phase steering the super-elements so that its peak corresponds in u-v space to the peak of the super-element pattern. An exemplary sine space representation is shown in
While slotted waveguide super-elements are shown, it is understood that randomization of super-element features in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention is applicable to super-elements in general for which it is desirable to reduce sidelobes. For example, stripline fed super-element embodiments can include randomization in alternative embodiments of the invention.
Grating lobes appear when the array factor grating lobes stray off of the null in the super-element pattern. For an array of super-elements, the far field pattern can be expressed as
where there are N super-elements in a column, each of length d>>λ, k=2π/λ*sin θ, where θ is the viewing angle along the column direction, ko is the k to which the array is scanned, and kso is the scan angle of the subarray. Element kso is a function of the instantaneous frequency f, whereas ko is fixed. For an instantaneous frequency f≠fo, ko≠kso. Equation 1 shows that when
k=ko+/−2π/d and f=fo, Eq. (2)
the grating lobe of the array factor appears at the null of the super-element pattern. However, for f≠fo, the grating lobe moves off of the super-element pattern null, and a significant sidelobe can appear.
Equation 1 corresponds to
where the sum is performed over M columns of the array, the starting position of column i is dδi, and δi is a random number from 0 to 1. If one looks at the first array factor grating lobe that appears at k=ko+2π/d, the average of F is zero. The is value will be 1/M. There is no effect on the mainlobe of the array, and the grating lobe level is suppressed by 1/M.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention enable the reduction of peak sidelobe levels due to super-element grating lobes by randomizing the positions of the super-elements in a column-to-column basis. This arrangement does not generate an increase in cost for the array electronics or beamformer. In one embodiment, the array is built in groups of columns, e.g. eight, that are not shifted, but instead shift the column groups randomly with respect to each other. This will result in an increase in sidelobe level by 10 log K, where K is the size of the column group. In the example, the array has 632 columns, which should give a grating lobe reduction of approximately 28 db. As can be seen from
Having described exemplary embodiments of the invention, it will now become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating their concepts may also be used. The embodiments contained herein should not be limited to disclosed embodiments but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/635,893, filed on Dec. 11, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/163,266, filed on Mar. 25, 2009, which are both incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3021521 | Hutchins | Feb 1962 | A |
4197540 | Riggs et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4216472 | Albanese | Aug 1980 | A |
4970519 | Minnis et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5343211 | Kott | Aug 1994 | A |
5646625 | Burrier | Jul 1997 | A |
5911692 | Hussain et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5966048 | Thompson | Oct 1999 | A |
6043791 | Kinsey | Mar 2000 | A |
6078289 | Manoogian | Jun 2000 | A |
6218987 | Derneryd et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6279399 | Holm | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6496158 | Ksienski et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507315 | Purdy et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6621470 | Boeringer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6799014 | Rosen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6856284 | Cangiani | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6933878 | Molyneux-Berry | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6963312 | Schuneman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7180457 | Trott et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7474262 | Alland | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477921 | Shattil | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492313 | Ehret et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7517317 | Lazenby | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538564 | Ehrmann et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7808427 | Sarcione et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
20050012665 | Runyon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060164284 | Pauplis | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080204318 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080272959 | Meharry et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090002249 | Bloss | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20120319900 | Johansson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,926 dated Aug. 19, 2013, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,890 Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 2, 2014, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/329,682 Response to Office Action filed on Sep. 2, 2014, 8 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,926 dated Dec. 27, 2013, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/329,682 Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,926 Response filed on Jun. 25, 2014 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,926 Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2013 6 pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,334, filed Dec. 20, 2011 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893, filed Dec. 11, 2009, Schuss et al. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,066. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,893 dated Aug. 26, 2011, 6 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Aug. 26, 2011, filed on Nov. 21, 2011, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,893, 5 pages. |
RCE and Amendment filed Mar. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893, 7 pages. |
Office Acton in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Mar. 15, 2012, 6 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Mar. 15, 2012, filed on Aug. 14, 2012, 4 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Oct. 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Oct. 10, 2012, filed on Apr 9, 2013, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Apr. 19, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533 dated Jun. 7, 2012, 6 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533 dated Jun. 7, 2012, filed Jul. 9, 2012, 1 page. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533 dated Aug. 1, 2012, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61163266 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12635893 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13945197 | US |