Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6360553
-
Patent Number
6,360,553
-
Date Filed
Friday, March 31, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, March 26, 200222 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 062 203
- 062 217
- 062 2283
- 062 175
- 062 204
- 062 205
- 062 206
- 062 2281
- 062 2285
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A method and apparatus for refrigeration system control is provided. The refrigeration system includes a plurality of circuits with each circuit having at least one refrigeration case. An electronic evaporator pressure regulator is in communication with each circuit and is operable to control the temperature of the corresponding circuit. A plurality of compressors are also provided with each compressor forming a part of a compressor rack. A pressure sensor is used for measuring the suction pressure of the compressor rack. A sensor is in communication with each circuit and is operable to measure a parameter from each circuit. A controller controls each electronic evaporator pressure regulator and the suction pressure based upon the measured parameters from each circuit.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control utilizing electronic evaporator pressure regulators and a floating suction pressure set point at a compressor rack.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
A conventional refrigeration system includes a compressor that compresses refrigerant vapor. The refrigerant vapor from the compressor is directed into a condenser coil where the vapor is liquefied at high pressure. The high pressure liquid refrigerant is then generally delivered to a receiver tank. The high pressure liquid refrigerant from the receiver tank flows from the receiver tank to an evaporator coil after it is expanded by an expansion valve to a low pressure two-phase refrigerant. As the low pressure two-phase refrigerant flows through the evaporator coil, the refrigerant absorbs heat from the refrigeration case and boils off to a single phase low pressure vapor that finally returns to the compressor where the closed loop refrigeration process repeats itself.
In some systems, the refrigeration system will include multiple compressors connected to multiple circuits where a circuit is defined as a physically plumbed series of cases operating at the same pressure/temperature. For example, in a grocery store, one set of cases within a circuit may be used for frozen food, another set used for meats, while another set is used for dairy. Each circuit having a group of cases will thus operate at different temperatures. These differences in temperature are generally achieved by using mechanical evaporator pressure regulators (EPR) or valves located in series with each circuit. Each mechanical evaporator pressure regulator regulates the pressure for all the cases connected within a given circuit. The pressure at which the evaporator pressure regulator controls the circuit is adjusted once during the system start-up using a mechanical pilot screw adjustment present in the valve. The pressure regulation point is selected based on case temperature requirements and pressure drop between the cases and the rack suction pressure.
The multiple compressors are also piped together using suction and discharge gas headers to form a compressor rack consisting of the multiple compressors in parallel. The suction pressure for the compressor rack is controlled by modulating each of the compressors on and off in a controlled fashion. The suction pressure set point for the rack is generally set to a value that can meet the lowest evaporator circuit requirement. In other words, the circuit that operates at the lowest temperature generally controls the suction pressure set point which is fixed to support this circuit.
There are, however, various disadvantages of running and controlling a system in this manner. For example, one disadvantage is that the requirement for the case temperature generally changes throughout the year. This requires a refrigeration mechanic to perform an in-situ change of evaporator pressure settings, via the pilot screw adjustment of each evaporator pressure regulator, thereby further requiring re-adjustment of the fixed suction pressure set point at the rack of compressors. Another disadvantage of this type of control system is that case loads change from winter to summer. Thus, in the winter, there is a lower case load which requires a higher suction pressure set point and in the summer there is a higher load requiring a lower suction pressure set point. However, in the real world, such adjustments are seldom done since they also require manual adjustment by way of a refrigeration mechanic.
What is needed then is a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control which utilizes electronic evaporator pressure regulators and a floating suction pressure set point for the rack of compressors which does not suffer from the above mentioned disadvantages. This, in turn, will provide adaptive adjustment of the evaporator pressure for each circuit, adaptive adjustment of the rack suction pressure, enable changing evaporator pressure requirements remotely, enable adaptive changes in pressure settings for each circuit throughout its operation so that the rack suction pressure is operated at its highest possible value, enable floating circuit temperature based on a product simulator probe, and enable the use of case temperature information to control the evaporator pressure for the whole circuit and the suction pressure at the compressor rack. It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide such a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control using electronic evaporator pressure regulators and a floating suction pressure set point.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control utilizing electronic evaporator pressure regulators and a floating suction pressure set point is disclosed. To achieve the above objects of the present invention, the present method and apparatus employs electronic stepper regulators (ESR) instead of mechanical evaporator pressure regulators. The method and apparatus may also utilize temperature display modules at each case that can be configured to collect case temperature, product temperature and other temperatures. The display modules are daisy-chained together to form a communication network with a master controller that controls the electric stepper regulators and the suction pressure set point. The communication network utilized can either be a RS-485 or other protocol, such as LonWorks from Echelon.
In this regard, the data is transferred to the master controller where the data is logged, analyzed and control decisions for the ESR valve position and suction pressure set points are made. The master controller collects the case temperature for all the cases in a given circuit, takes average/min/max (based on user configuration) and applies PI/PID/Fuzzy Logic algorithms to decide the ESR valve position for each circuit. Alternatively, the master controller may collect liquid sub-cooling or relative humidity information to control the ESR valve position for each circuit. The master controller also controls the suction pressure set point for the rack which is adaptively changed, such that the set point is adjusted in such a way that at least one ESR valve is always kept substantially 100% open.
In one preferred embodiment, an apparatus for refrigeration system control includes a plurality of circuits with each of the circuits having at least one refrigeration case. An electronic evaporator pressure regulator is in communication with each circuit with each electronic evaporator pressure regulator operable to control the temperature of each circuit. A sensor is in communication with each circuit and is operable to measure a parameter from each circuit. A plurality of compressors is also provided with each compressor forming a part of a compressor rack. A controller controls each evaporator pressure regulator and a suction pressure of the compressor rack based upon the measured parameters from each of the circuits.
In another preferred embodiment, a method for refrigeration system control is set forth. This method includes measuring a first parameter from a first circuit where the first circuit includes at least one refrigeration case, measuring a second parameter from a second circuit where the second circuit includes at least one refrigeration case, determining a first valve position for a first electronic evaporator pressure regulator associated with the first circuit based upon the first parameter, determining a second valve position for a second electronic evaporator pressure regulator associated with the second circuit based upon the second parameter, electronically controlling the first and the second evaporator pressure regulators to control the temperature in the first circuit and the second circuit.
In another preferred embodiment, a method for refrigeration system control is set forth. This method includes a lead circuit having a lowest temperature set point from a plurality of circuits where each circuit has at least one refrigeration case, initializing a suction pressure set point for a compressor rack having at least one compressor based upon the identified lead circuit, determining a change in suction pressure set point based upon measured parameters from the lead circuit and updating the suction pressure based upon the change in suction pressure set point.
In yet another preferred embodiment, a method for refrigeration system control is also set forth. This method includes setting a maximum allowable product temperature for a circuit having at least one refrigeration case, determining a product simulated temperature for the circuit, calculating the difference between the product simulated temperature and the maximum allowable product temperature, and adjusting the temperature set point of the circuit based upon the calculated difference.
Use of the present invention provides a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control. As a result, the aforementioned disadvantages associated with the currently available refrigeration control systems have been substantially reduced or eliminated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Still other advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art after reading the following specification and by reference to the drawings in which:
FIG. 1
is a block diagram of a refrigeration system employing a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment in the present invention;
FIG. 2
is a wiring diagram illustrating use of a display module according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment in the present invention;
FIG. 3
is a flow chart illustrating circuit pressure control using an electronic pressure regulator;
FIG. 4
is a flow chart illustrating circuit temperature control using an electronic pressure regulator;
FIG. 5
is an adaptive flow chart to float the rack suction pressure set point according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6
is an illustration of the fuzzy logic utilized in methods
1
and
2
of
FIG. 5
;
FIG. 7
is an illustration of the fuzzy logic utilized in method
3
of
FIG. 5
; and
FIG. 8
is a flow chart illustrating floating circuit or case temperature control based upon a product simulator temperature probe;
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)
The following description of the preferred embodiments concerning a method and apparatus for refrigeration system control utilizing electronic evaporator pressure regulators and a floating rack suction pressure set point is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or its application or uses. Moreover, while the present invention is discussed in detail below with respect to specific types of hardware, the present invention may employ other types of hardware which are operable to be configured to provide substantially the same control as discussed herein.
Referring to
FIG. 1
, a detailed block diagram of a refrigeration system
10
according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment in the present invention is shown. The refrigeration system
10
includes a plurality of compressors
12
piped together with a common suction manifold
14
and a discharge header
16
all positioned within a compressor rack
18
. The compressor rack
18
compresses refrigerant vapor which is delivered to a condenser
20
where the refrigerant vapor is liquefied at high pressure. This high pressure liquid refrigerant is delivered to a plurality of refrigeration cases
22
by way of piping
24
. Each refrigeration case
22
is arranged in separate circuits
26
consisting of a plurality of refrigeration cases
22
which operate within a same temperature range.
FIG. 1
illustrates four (4) circuits
26
labeled circuit A, circuit B, circuit C and circuit D. Each circuit
26
is shown consisting of four (4) refrigeration cases
22
. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that any number of circuits
26
, as well as any number of refrigeration cases
22
may be employed within a circuit
26
. As indicated, each circuit
26
will generally operate within a certain temperature range. For example, circuit A may be for frozen food, circuit B may be for dairy, circuit C may be for meat, etc.
Since the temperature requirement is different for each circuit
26
, each circuit
26
includes a pressure regulator
28
which is preferably an electronic stepper regulator (ESR) or valve
28
which acts to control the evaporator pressure and hence, the temperature of the refrigerated space in the refrigeration cases
22
. Each refrigeration case
22
also includes its own evaporator and its own expansion valve which may be either a mechanical or an electronic valve for controlling the superheat of the refrigerant. In this regard, refrigerant is delivered by piping
24
to the evaporator in each refrigeration case
22
. The refrigerant passes through an expansion valve where a pressure drop occurs to change the high pressure liquid refrigerant to a lower pressure combination of a liquid and a vapor. As the hot air from the refrigeration case
22
moves across the evaporator coil, the low pressure liquid turns into gas. This low pressure gas is delivered to the pressure regulator
28
associated with that particular circuit
26
. At the pressure regulator
28
, the pressure is dropped as the gas returns to the compressor rack
18
. At the compressor rack
18
, the low pressure gas is again compressed to a high pressure and delivered to the condenser
20
which again, creates a high pressure liquid to start the refrigeration cycle over.
To control the various functions of the refrigeration system
10
, a main refrigeration controller
30
is used and configured or programmed to control the operation of each pressure regulator (ESR)
28
, as well as the suction pressure set point for the entire compressor rack
18
, further discussed herein. The refrigeration controller
30
is preferably an Einstein Area Controller offered by CPC, Inc. of Atlanta, Ga., or any other type of programmable controller which may be programmed, as discussed herein. The refrigeration controller
30
controls the bank of compressors
12
in the compressor rack
18
, via an input/output module
32
. The input/output module
32
has relay switches to turn the compressors
12
on an off to provide the desired suction pressure. A separate case controller, such as a CC-100 case controller, also offered by CPC, Inc. of Atlanta, Ga. may be used to control the superheat of the refrigerant to each refrigeration case
22
, via an electronic expansion valve in each refrigeration case
22
by way of a communication network or bus
34
. Alternatively, a mechanical expansion valve may be used in place of the separate case controller. Should separate case controllers be utilized, the main refrigeration controller
30
may be used to configure each separate case controller, also via the communication bus
34
. The communication bus
34
may either be a RS-485 communication bus or a LonWorks Echelon bus which enables the main refrigeration controller
30
and the separate case controllers to receive information from each case
22
.
In order to monitor the pressure in each circuit
26
, a pressure transducer
36
may be provided at each circuit
26
(see circuit A) and positioned at the output of the bank of refrigeration cases
22
or just prior to the pressure regulator
28
. Each pressure transducer
36
delivers an analog signal to an analog input board
38
which measures the analog signal and delivers this information to the main refrigeration controller
30
, via the communication bus
34
. The analog input board
38
may be a conventional analog input board utilized in the refrigeration control environment. A pressure transducer
40
is also utilized to measure the suction pressure for the compressor rack
18
which is also delivered to the analog input board
38
. The pressure transducer
40
enables adaptive control of the suction pressure for the compressor rack
18
, further discussed herein. In order to vary the openings in each pressure regulator
28
, an electronic stepper regulator (ESR) board
42
is utilized which is capable of driving up to eight (8) electronic stepper regulators
28
. The ESR board
42
is preferably an ESR
8
board offered by CPC, Inc. of Atlanta, Ga., which consists of eight (8) drivers capable of driving the stepper valves
28
, via control from the main refrigeration controller
30
.
As opposed to using a pressure transducer
36
to control a pressure regulator
28
, ambient temperature inside the cases
22
may be also be used to control the opening of each pressure regulator
28
. In this regard, circuit B is shown having temperature sensors
44
associated with each individual refrigeration case
22
. Each refrigeration case
22
in the circuit B may have a separate temperature sensor
44
to take average/min/max temperatures used to control the pressure regulator
28
or a single temperature sensor
44
may be utilized in one refrigeration case
22
within circuit B, since all of the refrigeration cases in a circuit
26
operate at substantially the same temperature range. These temperature inputs are also provided to the analog input board
38
which returns the information to the main refrigeration controller
30
, via the communication bus
34
.
As opposed to using an individual temperature sensor
44
to determine the temperature for a refrigeration case
22
, a temperature display module
46
may alternatively be used, as shown in circuit A. The temperature display module
46
is preferably a TD
3
Case Temperature Display, also offered by CPC, Inc. of Atlanta, Ga. The connection of the temperature display
46
is shown in more detail in FIG.
2
. In this regard, the display module
46
will be mounted in each refrigeration case
22
. Each module
46
is designed to measure up to three (3) temperature signals. These signals include the case discharge air temperature, via discharge temperature sensor
48
, the simulated product temperature, via the product simulator temperature probe
50
and a defrost termination temperature, via a defrost termination sensor
52
. These sensors may also be interchanged with other sensors, such as return air sensor, evaporator temperature or clean switch sensor. The display module
46
also includes an LED display
54
that can be configured to display any of the temperatures and/or case status (defrost/refrigeration/alarm).
The product simulator temperature probe
50
is preferably the Product Probe, also offered by CPC, Inc. of Atlanta, Ga. The product probe
50
is a 16 oz. container filled with four percent (4%) salt water or with a material that has a thermal property similar to food products. The temperature sensing element is embedded in the center of the whole assembly so that the product probe
50
acts thermally like real food products, such as chicken, meat, etc. The display module
46
will measure the case discharge air temperature, via the discharge temperature sensor
48
and the product simulated temperature, via the product probe temperature sensor
50
and then transmit this data to the main refrigeration controller
30
, via the communication bus
34
. This information is logged and used for subsequent system control utilizing the novel methods discussed herein.
Alarm limits for each sensor
48
,
50
and
52
may also be set at the main refrigeration controller
30
, as well as defrosting parameters. The alarm and defrost information can be transmitted from the main refrigeration controller
30
to the display module
46
for displaying the status on the LED display
54
.
FIG. 2
also shows an alternative configuration for temperature sensing with the display module
46
. In this regard, the display module
46
is optionally shown connected to an individual case controller
56
, such as the CC-100 Case Controller, offered by CPC, Inc. of Atlanta, Ga. The case controller
56
receives temperature information from the display module
46
to control the electronic expansion valve in the evaporator of the refrigeration case
22
, thereby regulating the flow of refrigerant into the evaporator coil and the resultant superheat. This case controller
56
may also control the alarm and defrost operations, as well as send this information back to the display module
46
and/or the refrigeration controller
30
.
Briefly, the suction pressure at the compressor rack
18
is dependent in the temperature requirement for each circuit
26
. For example, assume circuit A operates at 10° F., circuit B operates at 15° F., circuit C operates at 20° F. and circuit D operates at 25° F. The suction pressure at the compressor rack
18
, which is sensed, via the pressure transducer
40
, requires a suction pressure set point based on the lowest temperature requirement for all the circuits
26
(i.e., circuit A) or the lead circuit
26
. Therefore, the suction pressure at the compressor rack
18
is set to achieve a 10° F. operating temperature for circuit A. This requires the pressure regulator
28
to be substantially opened 100% in circuit A. Thus, if the suction pressure is set for achieving 10° F. at circuit A and no pressure regulator valves
28
were used for each circuit
26
, each circuit
26
would operate at the same temperature. However, since each circuit
26
is operating at a different temperature, the electronic stepper regulators or valves
28
are closed a certain percentage for each circuit
26
to control the corresponding temperature for that particular circuit
26
. To raise the temperature to 15° F. for circuit B, the stepper regulator valve
28
in circuit B is closed slightly, the valve
28
in circuit C is closed further, and the valve
28
in circuit D is closed even further providing for the various required temperatures.
Each electronic pressure regulator (ESR)
28
may be controlled in one of three (3) ways. Specifically, each pressure regulator
28
may be controlled based upon pressure readings from the pressure transducer
36
, based upon temperature readings, via the temperature sensor
44
, or based upon multiple temperature readings taken through the display module
46
.
Referring to
FIG. 3
, a pressure control logic
60
is shown which controls the electronic pressure regulators (ESR)
28
. In this regard, the electronic pressure regulators
28
are controlled by measuring the pressure of a particular circuit
26
by way of the pressure transducer
36
. As shown in
FIG. 1
, circuit A includes a pressure transducer
36
which is coupled to the analog input board
38
. The analog input board
38
measures the evaporator pressure and transmits the data to the refrigeration controller
30
using the communication network
34
. The pressure control logic or algorithm
60
is programmed into the refrigeration controller
30
.
The pressure control logic
60
includes a set point algorithm
62
. The set point algorithm
62
is used to adaptively change the desired circuit pressure set point value (SP_ct) for the particular circuit
26
being analyzed based on the level of liquid sub-cooling after the condenser
20
or based on relative humidity (RH) inside the store. The sub-cooling value is the amount of cooling in the liquid refrigerant out of the condenser
20
that is more than the boiling point of the liquid refrigerant. For example, assuming the liquid is water which boils at 212° F. and the temperature out of the condenser is 55° F., the difference between 212° F. and 55° F. is the sub-cooling value (i.e., sub-cooling equals difference between boiling point and liquid temperature). In use, a user will simply select a desired circuit pressure set point value (SP_ct) based on the desired temperature within the particular circuit
26
and the type of refrigerant used from known temperature look-up tables or charts. The set point algorithm
62
will adaptively vary this set point based on the level of liquid sub-cooling after the condenser
20
or based on the relative humidity (RH) inside the store. In this regard, if the circuit pressure set point (SP_ct) for a circuit
26
is chosen to be 30 psig for summer conditions at 80% RH, and 10° F. liquid refrigerant sub-cooling, then for 20% RH or 50° F. sub-cooling, the circuit pressure set point (SP_ct) will be adaptively changed to 33 psig. For other relative humidity (RH %) percentages or other liquid sub-cooling, the values can simply be interpolated from above to determine the corresponding circuit pressure set point (SP_ct). The resulting adaptive circuit pressure set point (SP_ct) is then forwarded to a valve opening control
64
.
The valve opening control
64
includes an error detector
66
and a PI/PID/Fuzzy Logic algorithm
68
. The error detector
66
receives the circuit evaporator pressure (P_ct) which is measured by way of the pressure transducer
36
located at the output of the circuit
26
. The error detector
26
also receives the adaptive circuit pressure set point (SP_ct) from the set point algorithm
62
to determine the difference or error (E_ct) between the circuit evaporator pressure (P_ct) and the desired circuit pressure set point (SP_ct). This error (E_ct) is applied to the PI/PID/Fuzy Logic algorithm
68
. The PI/PID/Fuzzy Logic algorithm
68
may be any conventional refrigeration control algorithm that can receive an error value and determine a percent (%) valve opening (VO_ct) value for the electronic evaporator pressure regulator
28
. It should be noted that in the winter, there is a lower load which therefore requires a higher circuit pressure set point (SP_ct), while in the summer there is a higher load requiring a lower circuit pressure set point (SP_ct). The valve opening (VO_ct) is then used by the refrigeration controller
30
to control the electronic pressure regulator (ESR)
28
for the particular circuit
26
being analyzed via the ESR board
42
and the communication bus
34
.
Referring to
FIG. 4
, a temperature control logic
70
is shown which may be used in place of the pressure control logic
60
to control the electronic pressure regulator (ESR)
28
for the particular circuit
26
being analyzed. In this regard, each electronic pressure regulator
28
is controlled by measuring the case temperature with respect to the particular circuit
26
. As shown in
FIG. 1
, circuit B includes case temperature sensors
44
which are coupled to the analog input board
38
. The analog input board
38
measures the case temperature and transmits the data to the refrigeration controller
30
using the communication network
34
. The temperature control logic or algorithm
70
is programmed into the refrigeration controller
30
.
The temperature control logic
70
may either receive case temperatures (T
1
, T
2
, T
3
, . . . T
n
) from each case
22
in the particular circuit
26
or a single temperature from one case
22
in the circuit
26
. Should multiple temperatures be monitored, these temperatures (T
1
, T
2
, T
3
, . . . T
n
) are manipulated by an average/min/max temperature block
72
. Block
72
can either be configured to take the average of each of the temperatures (T
1
, T
2
, T
3
, . . . T
n
) received from each of the cases
22
. Alternatively, the average/min/max temperature block
72
may be configured to monitor the minimum and maximum temperatures from the cases
22
to select a mean value to be utilized or some other appropriate value. Selection of which option to use will generally be determined based upon the type of hardware utilized in the refrigeration control system
10
. From block
72
, the temperature (T_ct) is applied to an error detector
74
. The error detector
74
compares the desired circuit temperature set point (SP_ct) which is set by the user in the refrigeration controller
30
to the actual measured temperature (T_ct) to provide an error value (E_ct). Here again, this error value (E_ct) is applied to a PI/PID/Fuzzy Logic algorithm
76
, which is a conventional refrigeration control algorithm, to determine a particular percent (%) valve opening (VO_ct) for the particular electronic pressure regulator (ESR)
28
being controlled via the ESR board
42
.
While the temperature control logic
70
is efficient to implement, it has inherent logistic disadvantages. For example, each case temperature sensor
44
requires connecting from each display case
22
to a motor room where the analog input board
38
is generally located. This creates a lot of wiring and installation costs. Therefore, an alternative to this configuration is to utilize the display module
46
, as shown in circuit A of FIG.
1
. In this regard, a temperature sensor within each case
22
passes the temperature information to the display module
46
which is daisy-chained to the communication network
34
. This way, the discharge air temperature sensor
48
or the product probe
50
may be used to determine the case temperature (T
1
, T
2
, T
3
, . . . T
n
). This information can then be transferred directly from the display module
46
to the refrigeration controller
30
without the need for the analog input board
38
, thereby substantially reducing wiring and installation costs.
An adaptive suction pressure control logic
80
to control the rack suction pressure set point (P_SP) is shown in FIG.
5
. In contrast, the suction pressure set point for a conventional rack is generally manually configured and fixed to a minimum of all the set points used for circuit pressure control. In other words, assume circuit A operates at 0° F., circuit B operates at 5° F., circuit C operates at 10° F. and circuit D operates at 20° F. A user would generally determine the required suction pressure set point based upon pressure/temperature tables and the lowest temperature circuit
26
(i.e., circuit A). In this example, for circuit A operating at 0° F., this would generally require a suction of 30 psig with R404A refrigerant. Therefore, pressure at the suction header
14
would be fixed slightly lower than 30 psig to support each of the circuits A-D. However, according to the teachings of the present invention, the suction pressure set point (P_SP) is not only chosen automatically but also it adaptively changed or floated during the regular control.
FIG. 5
illustrates the adaptive suction pressure control logic
80
to control the rack suction pressure set point according to the teachings of the present invention. This suction pressure set point control logic
80
is also generally programmed into the refrigeration controller
30
which adaptively changes the suction pressure, via turning the various compressors
12
on and off in the compressor rack
18
. The primary purpose of this adaptive suction pressure control logic
80
is to change the suction pressure set point in such a way that at least one electronic pressure regulator (ESR)
28
is substantially 100% open.
The suction pressure set point control logic
80
begins at start block
82
. From start block
82
, the adaptive control logic
80
proceeds to locator block
84
which locates or identifies the lead circuit
26
based upon the lowest temperature set point circuit that is not in defrost. In other words, should circuit A be operating at −10° F., circuit B should be operating at 0° F., circuit C would be operating at 5° F. and circuit D would be operating at 10° F., circuit A would be identified as the lead circuit
26
in block
84
. From block
84
, the control logic
80
proceeds to decision block
86
. At decision block
86
, a determination is made whether or not the lead circuit
26
has changed from the previous lead circuit
26
. In this regard, upon initial start-up of the control logic
80
, the lead circuit
26
selected in block
84
which is not in defrost will be a new lead circuit
26
, therefore following the yes branch of decision block
86
to initialization block
88
.
At initialization block
88
, the suction pressure set point P_SP for the lead circuit
26
is determined which is the saturation pressure of the lead circuit set point. For example, the initialized suction pressure set point (P_SP) is based upon the minimum set point from each of the circuits A-D (SP_ct
1
, SP_ct
2
, . . . SP_ctN) or the lead circuit
26
. Accordingly, if the electronic pressure regulators
28
are controlled based upon pressure, as set forth in
FIG. 3
, the known required circuit pressure set point (SP_ct) is selected from the lead circuit (i.e., circuit A) for this initialized suction pressure set point (P_SP). If the electronic pressure regulators
28
are controlled based on temperature, as set forth in
FIG. 4
, then pressure-temperature look-up tables or charts are used by the control logic
80
to convert the minimum circuit temperature set point (SP_ct) of the lead circuit
26
to the initialized suction pressure set point (P_SP). For example, for circuit A operating at −10°, the control logic
80
would determine the initialized suction pressure set point (P_SP) based upon pressure-temperature look-up tables or charts for the refrigerant used in the system. Since the suction pressure set point (P_SP) is taken from the lead circuit A, this is essentially a minimum of all the coolant saturation pressures of each of the circuits A-D.
Once the minimum suction pressure set point (P_SP) is initialized in initialization block
88
, the adaptive control or algorithm
80
proceeds to sampling block
90
. At sampling block
90
, the adaptive control logic
80
samples the error value (E_ct) (difference between actual circuit pressure and corresponding circuit pressure set point if pressure based control is performed (see FIG.
3
), if temperature based control then E_ct is the difference between actual circuit temperature and corresponding circuit temperature set point (see FIG.
4
)) and the valve opening percent (VO_ct) in the lead circuit every 10 seconds for 10 minutes. When the lead circuit A is in defrost, sampling is then performed on the next lead circuit (i.e., next higher temperature set point circuit) further discussed herein. This set of sixty samples of data from the lead circuit A is then used to calculate the percentage of error values (E_ct) and valve openings (VO_ct) that satisfy certain conditions in calculation block
92
.
In calculation block
92
, the percentage of error values (E_ct) that are less than 0 (E
0
); the percent of error values (E_ct) which are greater than 0 and less than 1 (E
1
) and the valve openings (VO_ct) that are greater than ninety percent are determined in calculation block
92
, represented by VO as set forth in block
92
. For example, assuming the sample block
90
samples the following error data:
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
|
1
+0.5
[−1.0]
+0.1
+1.8
[−1.0]
[−1.0]
|
2
+1.0
[−1.5]
[−1.5]
+2.0
[−2.0]
0.1
|
3
+2.0
[−3.0]
+0.5
+6.0
[−2.5]
0.2
|
4
+3.0
[−7.0]
[−0.3]
+3.0
[−2.2]
0.5
|
5
+1.5
[−4.0]
+0.4
+1.5
[−2.8]
0.9
|
6
+0.7
[−2.0]
+0.7
+0.9
[−2.3]
1.2
|
7
+0.2
[−3.0]
+0.8
+0.8
[−5.5]
1.3
|
8
0.0
[−1.5]
+1.1
+0.1
[−6.0]
1.6
|
9
[−0.3]
[−0.5]
+1.7
[−0.3]
[−4.0]
1.8
|
10
[−0.8]
[−0.1]
+1.3
[−0.8]
[−2.0]
2.0
|
|
where each column represents a measurement taken every ten seconds with six columns representing a total data set of 60 data points. There are 17 error values (E_ct) that are between 0 and 1 identified above by underlines, providing an E
1
of 17/60×100%=28.3%. There are also 27 error values (E_ct) that are less than 0, identified above by brackets, providing an E
0
of 27/60×100%=45%. Likewise, valve opening percentages are determined substantially in the same way based upon valve opening (VO_ct) measurements.
From calculation block
92
, the control logic
80
proceeds to either method
1
branch
94
, method
2
branch
96
, or method
3
branch
98
with each of these methods providing a substantially similar final control result. Methods
1
and
2
utilize E
0
and E
1
data only, while method
3
utilizes E
1
and VO data only. Methods
1
and
3
may be utilized with electronic pressure regulators.
28
, while method
2
may be used with mechanical pressure regulators. A selection of which method to utilize is therefore generally determined based upon the type of hardware utilized in the refrigeration system
10
.
From method
1
branch
94
, the control logic
80
proceeds to set block
100
which sets the electronic stepper regulator valve
28
for the lead circuit A at 100% open during refrigeration. Once the electronic stepper regulator valve
28
for circuit A is set at 100% open, the control logic
80
proceeds to fuzzy logic block
102
. Fuzzy logic block
102
, further discussed in detail, utilizes membership functions for E
0
and E
1
to determine a change in the suction pressure set point (dP). Once this change in suction pressure set point (dP) is determined based on the fuzzy logic block
102
, the control logic
80
proceeds to update block
104
. At update block
104
, a new suction pressure set point P_SP is determined based upon the change in pressure set point (dP) where new P_SP=old P_SP+dP.
From the update block
104
, the control logic
80
returns to locator block
84
which locates or again identifies the lead circuit
26
. In this regard, should the current lead circuit A be put into defrost, the next lead circuit from the remaining circuits
26
in the system (circuit B-circuit D) is identified at locator block
84
. Here again, decision block
86
will identify that the lead circuit
26
has changed such that initialization block
88
will determine a new suction pressure set point (P_SP) based upon the new lead circuit
26
selected. Should circuit A not be in defrost and the temperatures for each circuit
26
have not been adjusted, the control logic will proceed to sample block
90
from decision block
86
to continue sampling data. In this way, should the lead circuit A be placed in defrost, the next leading circuit
26
will control the rack suction pressure and since this lead circuit
26
will have a temperature that is not as cold as the initial lead temperature, power is conserved based upon this power conserving loop formed by blocks
84
,
86
and
88
.
Referring to method
2
branch
96
, this method also proceeds to a fuzzy logic block
106
which determines the change in suction pressure set point (dP) based on E
0
and E
1
, substantially similar to fuzzy logic block
102
. From block
106
, the control logic
80
proceeds to update block
108
which updates the suction pressure set point (P_SP) based on the change in suction pressure set point (dP). From update block
108
, the control logic
80
returns to locator block
84
.
Referring to the method
3
branch
98
, this method utilizes fuzzy logic block
110
which determines a change in suction pressure set point (dP) based upon E
1
and VO, further discussed herein. From fuzzy logic block
110
, the control logic
80
proceeds to update block
112
which again updates the suction pressure set point P_SP=old P_SP+dP. From the update block
112
, the control logic
80
returns again to locator block
84
. It should be noted that while method
1
branch
94
forces the lead circuit A to 100% open via block
100
, method branches
2
and
3
will eventually direct the electronic stepper regulator valve
28
of lead circuit A to substantially 100% open, based upon the controls shown in
FIGS. 3 and 4
.
Turning to
FIG. 6
, the fuzzy logic utilized in method
1
branch
94
and method
2
branch
96
for fuzzy logic blocks
102
and
106
is further set forth in detail. In this regard, the membership function for E
0
is shown in graph
6
A, while the membership function for E
1
is shown in graph
6
B. Membership function E
0
includes an E
0
_Lo function, an E
0
_Avg and an E
0
_Hi function. Likewise, the membership function for E
1
also includes an E
1
_Lo function and E
1
_Avg function and an E
1
_Hi function, shown in graph
6
B. To determine the change in suction pressure set point (dP), a sample calculation is provided in
FIG. 6
for E
0
=40% and E
1
=30%.
In step
1
, which is the fuzzification step, for E
0
=40%, we have both an E
0
_Lo of 0.25 and an E
0
_Avg of 0.75, as shown in graph
6
A. For E
1
=30%, we have E
1
_Lo=0.5 and E
1
_Avg=0.5, as shown in graph
6
B. Once the fuzzification step
1
is performed, the calculation proceeds to step
2
which is a min/max step based upon the truth table
6
C. In this regard, each combination of the fuzzification step is reviewed in light of the truth table
6
C. These combinations include E
0
_Lo with E
1
_Lo; E
0
_Lo with E
1
_Avg; E
0
_Avg with E
1
_Lo; and E
0
_Avg with E
1
_Avg. Referring to the Truth Table
6
C, E
0
_Lo and E
1
_Lo provides for NBC which is a Negative Big Change. E
0
_Lo and E
1
_Avg provides NSC which is a Negative Small Change. E
0
_Avg and E
1
_Lo provides for PSC or Positive Small Change. E
0
_Avg and E
1
_Avg provides for PSC or Positive Small Change. In the minimization step, a minimum of each of these combinations is determined, as shown in Step
2
. The maximum is also determined which provides a PSC=0.5; and NSC=0.25 and an NBC=0.25.
From step
2
, the sample calculation proceeds to step
3
which is the defuzzification step. In step
3
, the net pressure set point change is calculated by using the following formula:
By inserting the appropriate values for the variables, we obtain a net pressure set point change of −0.25, as shown in step
3
of the defuzzification step which equals dP. This value is then subtracted from the suction pressure set point in the corresponding update blocks
104
or
108
.
Correspondingly for method
3
branch
98
, the membership function for VO and the membership function for E
1
are shown in FIG.
7
. Here again, the same three calculations from step
1
(fuzzification); step
2
(min/max) and step
3
(defuzzification) are performed to determine the net pressure set point change dP, based upon the membership function for VO shown in graph
7
A, the membership function for E
1
shown in graph
7
B, and the Truth Table
7
C.
Referring now to
FIG. 8
, a floating circuit temperature control logic
116
is illustrated. The floating circuit temperature control logic
116
is based upon taking temperature measurements from the product probe
50
shown in
FIG. 2
which simulates the product temperature for the particular product in the particular circuit
26
being monitored. The floating circuit temperature control logic
116
begins at start block
118
. From start block
118
, the control logic proceeds to differential block
120
. In differential block
120
, the average product simulation temperature for the past one hour or other appropriate time period is subtracted from a maximum allowable product temperature to determine a difference (diff). In this regard, measurements from the product probe
50
are preferably taken, for example, every ten seconds with a running average taken over a certain time period, such as one hour. The maximum allowable product temperature is generally controlled by the type of product being stored in the particular refrigeration case
22
. For example, for meat products, a limit of 41° F. is generally the maximum allowable temperature for maintaining meat in a refrigeration case
22
. To provide a further buffer, the maximum allowable product temperature can be set 5° F. lower than this maximum (i.e., 36° for meat).
From differential block
120
, the control logic
116
proceeds to either determination block
122
, determination block
124
or determination block
126
. In determination block
122
, if the difference between the average product simulator temperature and the maximum allowable product temperature from differential block
120
is greater than 5° F., a decrease of the temperature set point for the particular circuit
26
by 5° F. is performed at change block
128
. From here, the control logic returns to start block
118
. This branch identifies that the average product temperature is too warm, and therefore, needs to be cooled down. At determination block
124
, if the difference is greater than −5° F. and less than 5° F., this indicates that the average product temperature is sufficiently near the maximum allowable product temperature and no change of the temperature set point is performed in block
130
. Should the difference be less than −5° F. as determined in determination block
126
, an increase in the temperature set point of the circuit by 5° F. is performed in block
132
.
By floating the circuit temperature for the entire circuit
26
or the particular case
22
based upon the simulated product temperature, the refrigeration case
22
may be run in a more efficient manner since the control criteria is determined based upon the product temperature and not the case temperature which is a more accurate indication of desired temperatures. It should further be noted that while a differential of 5° F. has been identified in the control logic
116
, those skilled in the art would recognize that a higher or a lower temperature differential, may be utilized to provide even further fine tuning and all that is required is a high and low temperature differential limit to float the circuit temperature. It should further be noted that by using the floating circuit temperature control logic
116
in combination with the floating suction pressure control logic
80
further energy efficiencies can be realized.
The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion, and from the accompanying drawings and claims, that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims
- 1. An apparatus for refrigeration system control, said apparatus comprising:a plurality of circuits, each circuit having at least one refrigeration case; an electronic evaporator pressure regulator in communication with each circuit, each of said electronic evaporator pressure regulators operable to control a temperature of one of said circuits; a sensor in communication with each circuit and operable to measure a refrigerant pressure out of said circuit; a plurality of compressors, each compressor forming a part of a compressor rack; and a controller operable to control each electronic evaporator pressure regulator and a suction pressure of said compressor rack, said controller controlling each electronic evaporator pressure regulator based upon said pressure measurement from each of said circuits and at least one of relative humidity (RH) inside a building and a sub-cooling value of refrigerant delivered to each circuit.
- 2. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 wherein at least one of said electronic evaporator pressure regulators is substantially 100% open.
- 3. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 further comprising a sensor in communication with each of said circuits that is operable to measure an ambient refrigerant temperature in said at least one refrigeration case in each of said circuits.
- 4. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 wherein said controller controls said suction pressure based upon a lead circuit having a lowest temperature set point.
- 5. An apparatus for refrigeration system control, said apparatus comprising:a plurality of circuits, each circuit having at least one refrigeration case; an electronic evaporator pressure regulator in communication with each circuit, each of said electronic evaporator pressure regulators operable to control a temperature of one of said circuits; a sensor in communication with each circuit and operable to measure a parameter from said circuit; a plurality of compressors, each compressor forming a part of a compressor rack; and a controller operable to control each electronic evaporator pressure regulator and a suction pressure of said compressor rack based upon said measured parameters from each of said circuits, wherein said controller floats a circuit temperature for at least one of said circuits.
- 6. The apparatus as defined in claim 5 wherein said controller floats said circuit temperature based upon product simulated temperatures.
US Referenced Citations (37)