Patent Application
20070068143
The present invention relates to devices for exhaust aftertreatment for internal combustion engines; more particularly, to a mechanism for regenerating such aftertreatment devices that becomes fouled or loaded, in the case of traps, by exhaust through use; and most particularly, to method and apparatus for regeneration of an installed first aftertreatment device (AD1), for example, a diesel particulate filter (DPF) and a second aftertreatment device (AD2), for example, a nitrogen oxides (NOx) adsorber, using hydrogen-rich reformate generated by a catalytic hydrocarbon reformer.
Exhaust aftertreatment devices for reducing emissions from internal combustion engines are well known. It is known in the diesel engine art to provide in series a plurality of exhaust aftertreatment devices, referred to herein for simplicity as AD1 and AD2. Especially in treatment of diesel engine exhaust, such devices are designed to collect or trap undesirable exhaust constituents such as particulates or NOx, becoming full over time. They may also become contaminated by exhaust constituents which inactivate the aftertreatment device chemically, such as sulfur, or physically, such as ash, which can cause clogging or other dysfunction from prolonged exposure to the exhaust stream. Thus, it is important to be able to clean, or “regenerate,” inline exhaust amelioration devices as needed, while the engine is running.
It is further known in the prior art to provide a catalytic hydrocarbon reformer for generating hydrogen-rich reformate which is added to the engine exhaust stream upstream of the aftertreatment devices. The hydrogen attacks and removes deposits in the devices. In a typical cleaning duty cycle for an 8-cylinder light duty diesel vehicle, reformate is introduced into the exhaust stream for approximately 10 seconds, followed by approximately 70 seconds of little or no reformate. Typically, about 20 grams per second of reformate is needed for adequate regeneration.
In a prior art arrangement, the reformer takes in hydrocarbon fuel and fresh air to produce the reformate. To inject this reformate into the exhaust stream ahead of the aftertreatment devices requires that the pressure of the reformate be higher than the exhaust backpressure, Pengine, at all speeds and loads, so that the reformate will flow into the exhaust stream. The apparatus must include a pump to raise the pressure of the reformate output stream to a pressure of approximately 80-100 kPa above ambient pressure, Pambient, which is the nominal inlet air pressure for the engine and the reformer, to overcome the exhaust backpressure. If the pump is 80% efficient, for example, an electric motor of about 1.5 kW input is required to run the pump. This size electric motor is large, expensive, and not practically powered by conventional 12-14 volt electrical systems provided in typical vehicles.
What is needed in the art is an improved method and apparatus for providing reformate into an engine exhaust stream which reduces the required size of the pump and pump motor.
It is a principal object of the present invention to reduce the pressure head against which a reformate pump must operate, thereby reducing the required size of the pump and pump motor.
Briefly described, a method and apparatus in accordance with the invention for providing reformate into the exhaust stream of a gasoline (spark-ignited) or diesel (compression-ignited) internal combustion engine by means which reduces the required size of the reformate pump and pump motor for pressurizing a hydrocarbon catalytic reformer and a distribution valve for dividing the reformate output of the reformer and sending it to a plurality of different points in the engine exhaust stream. The engine exhaust system includes a plurality of aftertreatment devices such as a particulate trap and an NOx filter. The chosen reformer is effective with an oxidizing input comprising oxygen-depleted engine exhaust rather than ambient air, for reaction with hydrocarbon fuel. The reformer draws its oxidizing intake from the engine exhaust at exhaust line pressure and discharges its reformate back into the engine exhaust at any of several locations. Thus, the only pressure drop that the pump must overcome is that within the reformate supply system between the reformer take-off point and the reformate entry point. In a configuration wherein the exhaust is taken off ahead of the inline particulate trap, a separate particulate filter is preferably incorporated into the reformer supply line.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
In a prior art arrangement 10 for providing hydrogen-rich reformate 12 to exhaust pipe 05 for regeneration of AD1 and AD2, a source of reformate 14, such as a catalytic hydrocarbon reformer, is supplied with fresh air 16 by a gas pump 18, and with metered hydrocarbon fuel 20, to form reformate 12 which is directed to a controllable splitter valve 22. Valve 22 divides the flow of reformate 12 into first and second streams 24,26 which are directed into exhaust pipe 05 at point 28 ahead of AD1, and at point 30 ahead of AD2, respectively. Air 32 entering pump 18 is at ambient pressure, Pambient.
As noted above, a serious problem with prior art arrangement 10 is that an undesirably large pump motor and high-efficiency pump 18 is required to overcome high backpressure encountered for injecting reformate into exhaust line 05. This may be quantified as follows, where ΔPpump is the increase in air pressure required of pump 18:
ΔPpump>Pengine−Pambient=ca. 80-100 kPa (Eq. 1)
Referring to
The improvement in arrangement 110 is that the reforming oxygen supply 132 is drawn from pressurized engine exhaust in exhaust pipe 05 at point 134 upstream of point 28, rather than from ambient air as in the prior art, thus reducing the pressure differential that the pump must produce and allowing use of a much smaller motor and pump 118 than prior art pump 18. Engine exhaust, especially diesel exhaust, contains a substantial percentage of oxygen which may be employed in reforming fuel 20, although a different reformate source 114 may be required that is effective with an input that is oxygen-depleted engine exhaust rather than ambient air 32 in
Embodiment 110 offers the lowest pressure differential possible for pump 118, as the pump must overcome only the pressure drop across filter 103 (ΔPfilter), reformate source 114 (ΔPreformer) and valve 22 (ΔPvalve) to inject reformate at point 28 for regeneration of aftertreatment device 03 (AD1):
ΔPpump>ΔPfilter+Preformer+ΔPvalve (Eq. 2)
For regeneration of aftertreatment device 04 (AD2), the pump pressure difference is even lower, as the back pressure against which the pump must operate in injecting reformate at point 30 is reduced by the pressure drop across AD103, (ΔPAD1).
ΔPpump>(ΔPfilter+Preformer+ΔPvalve)−ΔPAD1 (Eq. 3)
Referring to
The improvement in arrangement 210 is that the reforming oxygen supply 232 is drawn from pressurized engine exhaust in exhaust pipe 05 at point 234 between AD1 and AD2. Because supply 132 is taken off downstream of particulate filter 03, inline particulate filter 103 is not needed in this embodiment.
Embodiment 210 offers the next lowest pressure differential possible for pump 118. This embodiment has the disadvantage that the pump pressure difference is higher than in embodiment 110 by the amount equal to the pressure difference across AD103. The pump must overcome not only the pressure drop across reformate source 114 (ΔPreformer) valve 22 (ΔPvalve), but also the pressure drop across AD1 (ΔPAD1) to inject reformate at point 28 for regeneration of aftertreatment 03 (AD1):
ΔPpump>ΔPreformer+ΔPvalve+ΔPAD1 (Eq. 4)
However, for regeneration of aftertreatment device 04 (AD2), the pump pressure difference is even lower than in embodiment 110, as the backpressure against which the pump must operate in injecting reformate at point 30 is only the pressure drop across the reformer (ΔPreformer) and the valve (ΔPvalve).
ΔPpump>ΔPreformer+ΔPvalve (Eq. 5)
It will be seen by one of ordinary skill in the art that a third configuration (not shown) is possible wherein the exhaust feed to the pump is taken from tail pipe 06. However, because the exhaust backpressure in the tailpipe is very nearly Pambient, such an embodiment offers little advantage over the prior art arrangement 10 shown in
Sufficient amounts of oxygen must be present in the exhaust stream to produce reformate by the reformate source. On the other hand, for successful particulate filter regeneration, no or a minimal amount of oxygen should be present in the exhaust stream during the regeneration cycle. Therefore, a means is provided, as shown in
Referring to
While the invention has been described by reference to various specific embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.
