Patent Application
20070056896
This U.S. patent application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/716,004, filed Sep. 9, 2005, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The invention relates generally to remediation of heavy metals and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for treating wet and dry bulk materials contaminated with a heavy metal.
Heavy metals such as lead, zinc, and chromium are found in certain paints and encountered in a number of industrial applications. In the painting industry, such materials are often used as pigments and in the production of anti-corrosion paints used to protect the metal surfaces of structures, airplanes, boats, and other vehicles. Lead-based paints, although disfavored for many applications, continue to be used in some industries, and such paints are still found in a number of commercial, industrial, and even residential settings. Zinc chromate is widely used in alkyd, epoxy, and polyurethane primers in the aerospace industry, because of its ability to protect aluminum, its thermal stability, and its ability to withstand thermal shock experienced by airplanes.
For such uses, it is not easily substituted . Unfortunately, zinc chromate and other heavy metal-containing paints, materials, and their dust are toxic.
When heavy metal-containing primers and paints are removed, and whenever bulk materials containing heavy metals are processed or moved, dusts and aerosols are produced, and the waste stream must be controlled.
The hoppers are connected to a pair of collection drums 3, via slide gates 4. Although the mechanism captures the contaminated paint residue, it does nothing to remediate it. The drums become filled with heavy metals, which can't be disposed of without treatment.
The safe treatment and disposal of such waste is regulated in most jurisdictions. Disposing of heavy metal-contaminated material in a landfill is environmentally irresponsible, as exposure to ground water, wind, rain, or other environmental conditions, can cause heavy metals to leach into the surrounding area. There is a substantial, continuing need for improved methods and apparatus for remediating heavy metals in wet and dry bulk materials, especially on site at locations where such materials are generated, processed, or removed.
According to the invention, an apparatus and a method for remediating heavy metal waste are provided. In a first aspect of the invention, an apparatus comprises a receptacle for wet or dry material contaminated with a heavy metal; a receptacle for a heavy metal remediation agent; a chamber coupled to each of the receptacles; a valve between each receptacle and the chamber; a port for introducing water into the chamber; and a mixer coupled to the chamber, where the heavy metal-containing material, remediation agent, and water can be mixed. In one embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a drum or other receptacle for collecting treated material discharged from the mixer.
In a second aspect of the invention, a method for remediating heavy metal waste is provided and comprises loading wet or dry material contaminated with a heavy metal into a receptacle, metering a predetermined amount of the contaminated material into a chamber coupled to the receptacle; loading a heavy metal-remediation agent into a second receptacle coupled to the chamber; metering a predetermined amount of the heavy metal-remediation agent from the second receptacle into the chamber; introducing water into the chamber; directing the contaminated material, heavy metal-remediation agent, and water into a mixer and mixing same therein; and discharging the resulting treated material into a receptacle.
Various features and advantages of the invention will become better understood when reference is made to the following detailed description and considered in light of the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The hoppers are coupled to the chamber either directly or, more preferably, via valves that enable material to be discharged into the chamber in a metered or controlled manner. For example, in
Advantageously, each of the drive motors for the valves 16a, 16b and auger 22 are linked to at least one sensor in a particular hopper, and more preferably to a pair of high/low sensors in each hopper. Thus, sensors 26a and 26c are linked to motor 42a; sensors 26b and 26d are linked to motor 42b; and sensors 26e and 26f are linked to motor 42c. Nonlimiting examples of suitable sensors include proximity sensors, “high/low” sensors, capacitive level sensors, and the like, their primary function being to detect material as it reaches or falls below a desired level within a hopper. Nonlimiting examples of motor-to-sensor links include electrical, optical, infrared, and wireless (e.g., radiofrequency) links. In one embodiment, the motors and sensors are further linked to a microprocessor (not shown), which is programmed to control operation of the motors in response to the level of material in the hoppers detected by the sensors.
Using a cross auger rather than a pair of conduits that converge toward the chamber 14 gives the apparatus a smaller vertical profile. This enables an existing baghouse (such as the one shown in
In
To operate the apparatus, wet or dry material contaminated with a heavy metal, such as sandblasted lead-based paint residue, other bulk powder, aggregate, dust, dirt, sludge, slag, etc., is loaded into the pair of hoppers 12a, 12b, either manually or, more preferably, using machinery, or via discharge from another apparatus (such as the output from a baghouse). A remediation agent capable of “fixing” the heavy metal (described below) is loaded into the third hopper 20. When sufficient material and remediation agent have been loaded into the hoppers (as determined by the sensors), the valves are actuated by the drive motors, and the contaminated material and remediation agent are discharged into the chamber in a controlled fashion, so that predetermined amounts of contaminated material and remediation agent are loaded into the chamber. Water is introduced into the chamber though the water port 24. Some mixing of contaminated material and remediation agent may occur as the chamber is loaded with components.
More thorough mixing takes place in the mixer 32, which is coupled to the port 28 in the bottom of the chamber. In the embodiment shown in
As used herein, the term “heavy metal remediation agent” (or simply, “remediation agent”) refers to a substance that is capable of “fixing” a heavy metal, either by transforming it to a less water-soluble form and/or by otherwise rendering the heavy metal substantially non-leachable (i.e., by encapsulating the metal in a substantially non-leachable matrix). Preferably, the remediation agent is capable of reducing the water-solubility of a heavy metal below the maximum amount permitted by statute, e.g., the U.S.-U.T.S. limits. The remediation agent is loaded into the hopper in pellet, flake, free-flowing powder, slurry, or some other suitable form. In the presence of water, the remediation agent interacts with heavy metals in the contaminated material and remediates the heavy metals—typically by causing them to precipitate, and/or by encapsulating the metals in an insoluble, cement—like matrix (when the treated material has dried).
The particular remediation agent selected to remediate a given material can depend on a number of factors, including the heavy metal(s) contaminating the bulk material, the amount of heavy metal present, the identity and amount of other elements and compounds present, and so forth. Nonlimiting examples of remediation agents include calcium sulfide, calcium phosphate, calcium hydroxide, calcium carbonate, calcium oxide, magnesium sulfide, magnesium phosphate, magnesium hydroxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium oxide, mixed calcium- and magnesium- containing carbonates and phosphates, apatite, di-calcium hydrogen phosphate, calcium di-hydrogen phosphate, triple super phosphate, dolomite, phosphoric acid and its salts, calcium-X-phosphates (where X is a metal ion), alkaline earth silicates, hydrated silica, hydrated alumina, metal sorbing clays, such as Bentonite and Fuller's Earth, and mixtures thereof. The mineral apatite, Ca5(PO4)3(F,Cl,OH), is functional, but slow. Alkaline earth silicates (e.g., calcium silicate), operate through sorption and as a consequence of their high alkalinity; hence, their effect is likely not permanent. When used by themselves, phosphates are considered suitable for remediation of lead, but they do not remediate other metals. Indeed, application of phosphates to arsenic can actually aggravate leaching.
In general, mixtures of the above-listed agents are preferred, especially mixtures of a sulfide, a carbonate and/or hydroxide, and a phosphate. Most heavy metal sulfides are water-insoluble. The presence of carbonates and phosphates (in particular) is believed to have a pH buffering effect, and/or minimizes subsequent redox reactions, thereby preserving the metal sulfide precipitate over an extended range of pH and other conditions. For materials contaminated with lead, a combination of calcium sulfide, calcium carbonate, and triple super phosphate is preferred. “Triple super phosphate” (TSP) is Ca(H2PO4)2.H2O (CAS No. 65996-95-4).
A particularly preferred remediation agent is MBS™ 2.1, a Molecular Bonding System™ brand remediation agent available from Solucorp Industries (West Nyack, NY). MBS™ 2.1 is a 3:2:1 (wt/wt) mixture of calcium carbonate/calcium sulfide/triple super phosphate. This reagent is capable of rendering insoluble harmful metals to concentrations below their U.S. Universal Treatments Standard (UTS) limits.
MBS™ 2.1 is not pH-dependent, and can remediate lead under conditions ranging from pH 1 to pH 13. In contrast, phosphates and silicates are pH-dependent, with phosphates functional under broadly neutral conditions (pH 6 to 8), and silicates functional under strongly alkaline conditions (>pH 10). Additionally, the MBS™ remediation agent converts soluble lead salts to lead sulfide, which is non-toxic by oral administration. Thus, its use should detoxify lead particulates.
The amount of remediation agent to be employed depends on a number of factors, including the identity, type, and amount of heavy metal(s) present (or suspected of being present) in the material to be remediated, and the choice of remediation agent. For example, bulk material that leaches 800mg metal/liter requires more remediation agent than material that leaches 50 or 100mg metal/liter. Bulk material containing metals in a highly oxidized state (e.g., chromium VI), can require treatment with more remediation agent, due to the higher reducing power that is required. As a general rule of thumb, the amount of remediation agent employed can range from about 2-30% wt/wt, based on the combined weight of remediation agent and bulk material being treated. As a nonlimiting example, the bulk material produced when lead-based paint is sandblasted (sometimes called “garnet dust”) can be effectively treated with 5% (wt/wt) MBS 2.1 and sufficient water to form an aqueous slurry.
As another example, conducted without using the apparatus described herein, it has been found that 100 grams of chromium (VI) paint residues contained within a 10 cm square section of a paint filter leaching 800 mg/Litre chromium (VI) (determined by TCLP) can be treated with 50 gram of MBS 2.1 in an aqueous slurry, thereby reducing the amount of leaching to 20 mg/Litre chromium (VI). In contrast, treatment with an amount of MBS remediation agent equal to the amount of paint residues trapped in the filter renders leaching to less than the UTS limit of 0.6 mg/Litre total chromium. Other wastes, for example those based on lead or zinc, require less MBS reagent.
Optionally, one or more surfactants, dispersing aids, flocculating agents, and/or other processing aids are also introduced into the chamber. They can be added to the remediation agent hopper, the water injection port, and/or introduced through another port (not shown) in the chamber.
Although the invention has thus far been described with reference to various embodiments and examples, it is not limited thereto. A number of variations and modifications can be made, consistent with the invention. For example, instead of a pair of hoppers for receiving heavy metal-contaminated material, a single hopper, or multiple hoppers, can be used. Similarly, the remediation agent can be delivered to the chamber 14 by more than a single hopper. (For example, the various components of MBS™ 2.1 —calcium carbonate/calcium sulfide/triple super phosphate—could each be delivered to the chamber through a separate hopper.) Rather than using an auger 22 to deliver remediation agent to the chamber, a metering valve (optionally in combination with a rotary airlock) can be utilized. The invention is limited only by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60716004 | Sep 2005 | US |
