The invention relates to methods for removing polymeric coatings from optical fiber and to apparatus for practicing such methods. In particular it relates to an advantageous method of removing such coatings by the application of heat within a non-oxidizing environment.
Optical fibers are key components in modem telecommunications systems. Basically, an optical fiber is a thin strand of glass capable of transmitting optical signals containing a large amount of information over long distances with very low loss. In its simplest form, it is a small diameter waveguide comprising a core having a first index of refraction surrounded by a cladding having a second (lower) index of refraction. A polymeric coating surrounding the cladding protects the fiber from contamination and mechanical damage and maintains mechanical strength. Typical optical fibers are made of high purity silica glass with minor concentrations of dopants to control the index of refraction. Typical coatings are dual coatings of urethane acrylates. An inner (primary) coating having a relatively low in situ equilibrium modulus is applied directly to the glass, and an outer (secondary) coating having a relatively high modulus surrounds the primary coating.
While protective coatings are critical for most applications of optical fiber, short lengths of coating must be temporarily removed in the fabrication of optical fiber devices and during the assembly of fiber networks. Because the surface of the glass fiber is susceptible to damage from abrasion and contamination, the surface is coated with protective polymer immediately after the fiber is drawn. However the coating must be temporarily removed in the fabrication of important optical fiber devices such as fiber Bragg gratings, long period gratings, fused couplers and metalcoated regions. Moreover end portions of the coating need to be removed in fusing successive fiber segments to form a network. The fiber may be recoated after such operations.
A variety of approaches have been used to remove fiber polymeric coatings, but none have been completely satisfactory. One method is to mechanically scrape the coating off the glass using a blade and then to chemically clean the exposed glass. This approach inevitably creates surface flaws on the fiber, reducing the strength and the reliability of devices produced from it. A second method uses chemical solvents to soften or completely remove the coating. While this approach has been used in manufacturing, it is difficult to automate and involves the use of hazardous chemicals, typically in the form of concentrated acids at high temperatures. A third method uses heat to soften the coating and mechanical removal of the softened coating followed by ultrasonic cleaning with a solvent such as acetone or alcohol. Accordingly there is a need for an improved method of removing polymeric coatings from optical fiber.
In accordance with the invention, the polymeric coating is removed from a coated optical fiber by disposing the fiber within a non-oxidizing environment and applying sufficient heat to volatilize at least a portion of the polymeric coating. The result is that the coating material bursts from the fiber, yielding a clean glass surface virtually free of surface flaws. In a preferred embodiment the non-oxidizing environment is inert gas and the heat is provided by resistive filament heaters.
The nature, advantages and various additional features of the invention will appear more fully upon consideration of the illustrative embodiments now to be described in connection with the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
It is to be understood that these drawings are for purposes of illustrating the concepts of the invention and are not to scale.
Referring to the drawings,
The next step (block B) is to form a non-oxidizing environment within the chamber. The chamber can be evacuated to a low pressure and filled with an inert gas such as Argon. The inert gas can be at ambient pressure (e.g. 1 atm) or below.
The third step shown in block C is to apply heat to the coated fiber. The heat should be sufficient to volatilize at least a portion of the coating without changing the phase of the glass. The heat should volatilize at least the most volatile components in the coating and cause the coating to burst from the fiber (explosive removal). The heat is preferably applied from a resistive filament within the evacuated chamber or from a laser, such as an infrared laser, within or outside the chamber. In typical cases involving two-layer acrylate coatings on silica fibers, the heat provided by a resistive filament glowing at a temperature in excess of about 800° C. is adequate to effect such removal.
The heat should be applied uniformly over the length of the coating to be removed, either by use of an elongated heat source or series of sources, by translating the fiber, or by translating the source of the heat.
As shown in
In typical operation, the coated fiber 27 is loaded into holders 25, 26 with an exposed intermediate length guided by V-grooves 23, 24 through the centers of filament heaters 21. The chamber 22 is sealed, air is pumped out and a non-oxidizing gas such as Argon is introduced. The filament heaters 21 are then heated by the application of electricity to glow red at temperatures in excess of about 800° C. and preferably to glow yellow at temperatures in excess of 1500° C. The heat volatizes portions of the coating causing the coating to burst from the fiber without mechanical assistance. Advantageously the heater is sufficiently hot to cause the coating to burst from the fiber in less than about 3 seconds and preferably less than about 1 second. This leaves a relatively clean glass surface free of mechanical damage, particulates or hazardous chemicals.
The invention can now be more clearly understood by consideration of the following example. The polymeric coating was stripped from a 1 inch section of coming SMF28 fiber using apparatus similar to that of FIG. 2. Stripping was carried out in a 1 Atm Ar environment. Unspliced stripped fiber yielded pull strengths of 600-800 kpsia. Best results were obtained in stripping dual acrylate coatings such as those surrounding Coming SMF28, Fuji Panda and 3M Tiger fibers. Dual coated fibers manufactured by Alcatel, Lucent, Fibercore and Sumitomo were found to strip in a similar manner.
It is understood that the above-described embodiments are illustrative of only a few of the many possible specific embodiments, which can represent applications of the invention. Numerous and varied other arrangements can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/968,211 filed by the present inventors concurrently herewith and entitled “Method and Apparatus For Removing Polymeric Coatings From Optical Fiber”, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1824056 | Power | Sep 1931 | A |
2083407 | Scranton | Jun 1937 | A |
2383469 | Colbert et al. | Aug 1945 | A |
3374114 | Wiener | Mar 1968 | A |
3582616 | Wrob | Jun 1971 | A |
3635454 | Angelo et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3728144 | Van Poucke | Apr 1973 | A |
3881902 | DeLuca | May 1975 | A |
3984614 | Isaksson | Oct 1976 | A |
4089790 | Adams | May 1978 | A |
4208221 | Rosen | Jun 1980 | A |
4220480 | Dwan | Sep 1980 | A |
4304582 | Aussenegg et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4490828 | Fukuhara et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4821410 | Pierpoint | Apr 1989 | A |
4902323 | Miller et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5070232 | Martin | Dec 1991 | A |
5360464 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5401321 | Hugo et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5770132 | Yamamura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5922098 | Tsuneishi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5939136 | Cronk et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948202 | Miller | Sep 1999 | A |
5949940 | Botelho et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954974 | Broer et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968283 | Walraven et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985448 | Koenig | Nov 1999 | A |
6207931 | Loser et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6402856 | Vetrano | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436198 | Swain et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437299 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6490023 | Levy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6607608 | Vetrano et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6799383 | Wiley | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20010023598 | Kohmura et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010047669 | Digonnet et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020008213 | Kawada | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030062070 | Swain et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
32041 | Feb 1983 | JP |
58-032041 | Feb 1983 | JP |
60-149003 | Jun 1985 | JP |
1-179708 | Jul 1989 | JP |
1-232303 | Sep 1989 | JP |
8-248234 | Sep 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030061837 A1 | Apr 2003 | US |