The present invention relates to fluid storage tanks either in ground, above ground or elevated hereinafter generically referred to as “reservoirs” and more particularly relates to systems and methods for the mixing of fluids in reservoirs and thereby preventing “stagnation” (as hereinafter defined) of fluids in reservoirs, excessive “aging” (as hereinafter defined) of fluids in reservoirs and the formation of an “ice cap” (as hereinafter defined). The present specification refers to potable water as an example of a stored fluid, however, the invention is equally applicable to other types of fluids where mixing is either required or desirable.
Potable water reservoirs such as standpipes (normally tanks with height greater than diameter), ground storage tanks (normally tanks with height less than diameter) or elevated storage tanks are connected to water distribution systems and are used, among other things, to supply water to the systems and/or maintain the pressure in the systems during periods when water consumption from the system is higher than the supply mechanism (pumps or pumping stations) to the system can provide. The reservoirs are therefore usually filling during periods when the system has supply capacity that exceeds the current consumption demand on the system or discharging into the system when the system has supply capacity that is less than the current consumption demand on the system. Potable water reservoirs typically contain water which has been treated through the addition of a disinfectant to prevent microbial growth in the water. Disinfectant concentrations in stored water decrease over time at a rate dependant upon a number of factors such as temperature, cleanliness of the system etc. This can result in unacceptable water quality if the period of retention of the water, or any part thereof in a reservoir, becomes too long or if the incoming fresh, treated water is not properly mixed with the existing stored water in a reservoir. Therefore, the age or retention period of water within potable water reservoirs and the mixing of incoming fresh water with the existing water are of concern to ensure that the quality of the water will meet the regulatory requirements for disinfectant concentrations. In addition, during periods of below freezing weather, the top surface of the water will cool and may freeze (this is referred to as an ice cap) unless it is exchanged for or mixed with the warmer water entering the reservoir. An ice cap may adhere to the reservoir walls and become thick enough to span the entire surface even when the water is drained from below. If sufficient water is drained from below a fully spanning ice cap, a vacuum is created, collapsing the ice cap which in turn can create, during the collapse, a second vacuum which can be much larger than the reservoir venting capacity and can result in an implosion of the roof and possibly the upper walls of the reservoir.
Water reservoirs are often filled and drained from a single pipe or a plurality of pipes located at or near the bottom of the reservoir. Under these conditions, when fresh water is added to the reservoir, it enters the lower part of the reservoir and when there is demand for water in the system, it is removed from the lower part of the reservoir resulting in a tendency for the last water added to be the first to be removed. This can be referred to as short circuiting. Temperature differences between stored water and new water may cause stratification which can in turn exacerbate short circuiting and water aging problems. Filling and draining from a single or a plurality of pipes located at or near the bottom creates little turbulence particularly in areas within the reservoir remote from these inlet and outlet pipes. As a result, the age or residency time of some waters within parts of the reservoir can be very long, resulting in loss of disinfectant residual, increase in disinfection by-products, biological growth, nitrification and other water quality and/or regulatory issues. This is referred to herein as “stagnation” or “stagnant water”. A perfect system would provide a first in, last out scenario (“cycling”), however, perfect cycling is either not possible or is cost prohibitive. A preferred system provides a tendency toward cycling combined with a first mixing of the new water with existing tank contents that are most remote from the point of withdrawal. A preferred system would efficiently mix new water entering the tank with the existing tank contents thereby preventing stagnation. A preferred system would provide total mixing of the new water with the existing tank contents in the shortest period of time. A preferred system would reduce the water age or residency time and related problems. A preferred system would eliminate the potential for ice cap formation. A preferred system would use the energy of the water entering and exiting the reservoir to perform all of the mixing functions. A preferred system would be adaptable to both of the two common types of reservoirs: i) reservoirs having separate inlet and outlet pipes which fill the reservoir through one pipe or a plurality of ports on one pipe (inlet) and drain the reservoir through a separate pipe or a plurality of ports on a separate pipe (outlet), said inlet and outlet pipes being remotely valved and remotely connected or remaining separate; and ii) reservoirs having a common inlet/outlet pipe which fills the reservoir and drains the reservoir through a common or singular pipe, manifold or header.
Prior art exists which attempts to promote mixing in reservoirs through a variety of systems and methods, all of which to varying degrees are inefficient or ineffective. These proposed systems and methods, and their deficiencies, include the following:
A deficiency of prior art systems and methods in general is the failure of the prior art to address the necessity of positioning and configuring the outlet pipes so as to discourage any tendency toward short circuiting and encourage a broad and general withdrawal of fluid across the full horizontal area of the reservoir or, when applicable, a vertical area.
It is desirable to provide an inexpensive and easily maintained mixing system for use in reservoirs in order to reduce the potential for dead zones, stagnation and excessive aging of the contained water and further to reduce the potential for the formation of dangerous ice caps.
The present invention provides a system and method for filling a reservoir through one or a plurality of inlet nozzles, which inlet nozzles include or are characterized by 1) a specifically designed size reduction between the main line or branch to which the inlet nozzle is attached and the nozzle pipe itself, 2) a specifically designed nozzle pipe length which, combined with the pressure increase provided by the size reduction, will produce the most appropriate jet flow, and 3) a specifically designed location and orientation of the inlet nozzle within the reservoir. The combination of the preceding parameters will produce a developed turbulent jet flow which, when the inlet nozzle is positioned at the appropriate elevation and oriented in the appropriate direction(s), will direct said developed turbulent jet flow with the appropriate momentum to reach the surface of the water with initial major mixing taking place in this area. The design of the inlet nozzle(s) based on the present invention should ideally be optimized with CFD (computational fluid dynamics) analysis or any other recognized fluid mechanics analysis using tank geometry and inlet rates for the specific project. The optimization would result in selecting a combination of the best mixing time and most cost effective system as well as operating directions for the user.
The present invention also provides a system and method for draining a reservoir from, normally, the bottom of the reservoir utilizing a horizontally oriented outlet header and a plurality of outlet pipes terminating in low loss contraction cones designed to induce drainage across the entire lower area of the reservoir. The design and dimensioning of the drain header, outlet pipes and low loss contraction cones should ideally be optimized with CFD analysis or any other recognized fluid mechanics analysis using tank geometry and withdrawal rates for the specific project.
The present invention will be described by way of example only with reference to the following drawings:
The purpose of the present invention is to promote complete mixing of reservoir contents 16, and therefore eliminate stagnation and ice cap formation, by introducing water to reservoir 10 in a way which creates an incoming developed turbulent jet flow in a location and direction which causes movement of all of the fluid within the reservoir and distribution and mixing of the incoming water throughout the reservoir, accompanied by withdrawal of water at an outlet location or locations remote from the inlet by a method which encourages withdrawal from a generalized area and discourages short circuiting. In this way, stagnant water or dead zones in tank 10 are prevented without using auxiliary mechanical devices.
An example mixing system of the present invention, as embodied in
Inlet section 29 includes inlet pipe 22 connected to inlet nozzle 26. Inlet nozzle 26 includes directional elbow 28, reducer 25, nozzle pipe 24 and check valve 32. Inlet nozzle 26 discharges incoming fresh water 31 in the form of a developed turbulent jet flow having a direction 30 relative to storage reservoir 10. Check valve 32 in
Fresh water entering reservoir 10 via inlet pipe 22 is directed to inlet nozzle 26. Water under pressure being injected through designed inlet nozzle 26 develops flow characteristics which direct the incoming fresh water 31 as a developed turbulent jet flow along jet direction 30 to the water surface which is typically, under operating conditions, between high water level 17 and low water level 19.
Inlet nozzle 26 is connected to inlet pipe 22 at a height above reservoir bottom 12 which ensures that the discharge end of inlet nozzle 26 is normally below low water level 19 of reservoir 10, but sufficiently high that the developed turbulent jet flow along jet direction 30 created by incoming fresh water 31 issuing from inlet nozzle 26 is capable of reaching the water surface at water level 17. Therefore, as the water level varies between low water level 19 and high water level 17, the jet created by incoming fresh water 31 will reach the surface of the water.
Inlet nozzle 26 is oriented by directional fitting 28 which is shown for purposes of illustration as a 45 degree elbow so that the developed turbulent jet flow along jet direction 30 created by incoming fresh water 31 issuing from inlet nozzle 26 reaches the water surface at water level 17 at approximately the center of the water surface, from which point said turbulent jet flow initiates a flow in upper portion 110 first to an area of wall 14 most remote from inlet nozzle 26 and subsequently deflected by wall 14 in a vertical and horizontal rotating direction to further enhance total mixing with reservoir contents 16.
Outlet section 41 in the example embodiment of
The horizontal outlet pipes 44 are shown as roughly equally spaced radially oriented pipes located in lower portion 12 of reservoir 10 such that water is drawn from all areas of the lower portion of the reservoir as shown by outgoing water flow arrows 36. Outlet manifold 40 is shown by example as being centrally located but can be located anywhere within the bottom of reservoir 10 as long as the configuration of manifold 40 and length of outlet pipes 44 induces flow from all areas of the lower portion of the reservoir.
All components of the mixing system in
Outlet section 41 in the embodiment of
It should be apparent to persons skilled in the art that various other modifications and adaptations of the structure described above are possible without departure from the spirit of the invention. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, some of these modifications and adaptations are illustrated in
FIGS. 17 and 18A-18B illustrate an example embodiment of the present invention having a plurality inlet nozzles and outlet cone assemblies connected in series along separate inlet and outlet headers in spaced relation to one another. The inlet nozzles may be oriented parallel or otherwise to each other. Likewise, the outlet cone assemblies may be oriented parallel or otherwise to each other. The inlet and outlet headers may extend horizontally or vertically.
FIGS. 19 and 20A-20B illustrate an example embodiment of the present invention having a plurality inlet nozzles and outlet cone assemblies connected in series along respective inlet and outlet headers which in turn are connected to a common inlet/outlet header. The inlet nozzles may be oriented parallel or otherwise to each other. Likewise, the outlet cone assemblies may be oriented parallel or otherwise to each other. The inlet and outlet headers may extend horizontally or vertically.
A person, skilled in the art, will note and appreciate various aspects of the present invention, including the following aspects:
Incoming fresh water is directed to upper portion 110 in reservoir 10 via a developed turbulent jet flow along jet direction 30 to encourage mixing first with water in upper portion 110 most remote from the point of withdrawal.
The developed turbulent jet flow along jet direction 30 reaches the surface of the water at approximately the center of the water surface, from which point the turbulent jet flow initiates a flow in contents of upper portion 110 first to an area of wall 14 most remote from inlet 26 and subsequently deflected by wall 14 in a vertical and horizontal rotating direction to further enhance total mixing with reservoir contents 16.
Water is drawn from the entire lower portion 112 of the reservoir contents due to the orientation, sizing and configuration of manifold 40 and the use and design of low loss contraction cones 46. The number and radial length of outlet pipes 44 depends upon the reservoir size and the location of outlet manifold 40.
During times of reservoir filling, water is prevented from initially entering the lower portion 112 of the reservoir contents by check valve 42 or remote check valve 45 and during times of withdrawal, water is prevented from leaving upper portion 110 in the reservoir by check valve(s) 32 or remote check valve 33.
Incoming fresh water 31 which has a negative buoyancy, i.e. is colder than existing reservoir contents (a common hot weather or summer condition) will be directed first to the top surface of upper portion 110 in reservoir 10 by a developed turbulent jet flow along jet direction 30 and will subsequently, due to negative buoyancy, migrate toward lower portion 112 thus accelerating mixing first with the reservoir contents in upper portion 110 most remote from the point of withdrawal and subsequently with the entire reservoir contents 16. Furthermore, it will be recognized that this accelerated mixing is a desirable condition during warm weather when disinfectant concentrations decrease at the fastest rate.
Incoming fresh water 31 which has a positive buoyancy, i.e. is warmer than existing reservoir contents (a common cold weather or winter condition) will be directed first to the top surface of upper portion 110 of the reservoir contents by a developed turbulent jet flow along jet direction 30 and will subsequently, due to positive buoyancy have less tendency to immediately migrate toward the lower portion 112 of the contents of reservoir 10. Furthermore it will be recognized that this is a desirable condition during cold weather because the extended residency of the warmer water in upper portion 110 will ensure that a dangerous ice cap does not form.
The required number and orientation of inlet nozzles 26 will depend on factors which include but are not necessarily limited to the configuration (diameter and height) of the reservoir and the rate of reservoir filling which affects the discharge velocity of the inlet nozzles. Furthermore, it will be realized that one or a plurality of inlet nozzles 26 can be utilized without departure from the spirit of the invention. In addition, it will be realized that a plurality of inlet nozzle locations within the reservoir can be utilized without departure from the spirit of the invention.
There may be reservoir configurations which necessitate a number of vertical or horizontal locations of inlet nozzles. Furthermore, it will be realized that one or a plurality of vertical or horizontal locations of inlet nozzles can be utilized without departure from the spirit of the invention.
The required number and orientation of outlet pipes will depend on factors which include but are not necessarily limited to the size or diameter of the reservoir. Furthermore, it will be realized that one or a plurality of outlet pipes can be utilized without departure from the spirit of the invention.
Use of low loss contraction cones will depend on factors which include but are not necessarily limited to the size or diameter of the reservoir. Furthermore, it will be realized that low loss contraction cones can be deleted where space dictates or where appropriate without departure from the spirit of the invention.
The design diameter and length of inlet nozzle pipe 24 is critical to the proper functioning of inlet nozzle 26 so that the optimum developed turbulent jet flow is created. Further, it will be realized that an inlet nozzle which is too small, while providing greater velocity to the discharge, will back pressure the system and create head loss problems with the control mechanism and; yet further, it will be realized that an inlet nozzle pipe which is too long will hinder the initiation of mixing with the tank contents and; yet finally, an inlet nozzle pipe which is too short will introduce the water in a hydraulically chaotic manner, not the required developed turbulent jet flow. An ideal length of a nozzle pipe is the length just adequate to develop a turbulent jet flow and direct the jet flow to a desired portion of the tank.
A mixing system which attempts to maximize total mixing of reservoir contents must take into account specific parameters which include the reservoir size and shape, size of inlet and outlet pipes, flow rates during filling and draining at various times of the day and days of the week and water temperatures during various seasons of the year. Further, it will be realized that this data, modeled in a CFD (computational fluid dynamics) system, or similar equivalent, will facilitate the most efficient inlet nozzle(s) and outlet manifold design. Further, it will be realized that head loss calculations must be performed to ensure that the mixing system as designed can be adapted to present control systems.
A system has been created which consistently places the incoming, fresh, treated and (in winter) warmer water first at the top of reservoir 10 while forcing the withdrawal from the bottom.
A system has been created which provides maximum acceleration to the mixing of the incoming, fresh, treated water with existing tank contents during periods of negative buoyancy (summer) when this is most desirable.
A system has been created which reduces the potential for dangerous ice cap formation during periods of positive buoyancy (winter) when this is most desirable.
A system has been created which combines mixing and the removal of potentially dangerous ice caps in a manner superior to any previously proposed systems.
This application claims benefit as a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/382,110 filed May 8, 2006, which application is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
531304 | Dousman | Dec 1894 | A |
926144 | Sherow | Jun 1909 | A |
981098 | McCaskell | Jan 1911 | A |
1468226 | Colburn et al. | Sep 1923 | A |
1468887 | Sterrick | Sep 1923 | A |
1580476 | Fassio | Apr 1926 | A |
1849437 | Rucker | Mar 1932 | A |
1878825 | Caise | Sep 1932 | A |
1961548 | Caise | Jun 1934 | A |
1992261 | Traudt | Feb 1935 | A |
2013370 | Tygart | Sep 1935 | A |
2045164 | Richards | Jun 1936 | A |
RE20488 | Zinkil | Aug 1937 | E |
2192806 | Smith | Mar 1940 | A |
2592904 | Jackson | Apr 1952 | A |
2603460 | Kalinske | Jul 1952 | A |
3202281 | Weston | Aug 1965 | A |
3292861 | Koreichi Kawamura et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3375942 | Boram | Apr 1968 | A |
3386182 | Lippert | Jun 1968 | A |
3586294 | Strong | Jun 1971 | A |
3647188 | Solt | Mar 1972 | A |
3648985 | Matweecha | Mar 1972 | A |
3692283 | Sauer et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3718319 | Weisman | Feb 1973 | A |
3762170 | Fitzhugh | Oct 1973 | A |
3762689 | Hege | Oct 1973 | A |
3810604 | Reiter | May 1974 | A |
3846079 | Alagy et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3847375 | Kuerten et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
4164541 | Platz et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4187029 | Canale et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4312167 | Cazaly et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4327531 | Cazaly et al. | May 1982 | A |
4332484 | Peters | Jun 1982 | A |
4465020 | Schafer | Aug 1984 | A |
4491414 | Hayatdavoudi et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4578921 | Cazaly et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4586825 | Hayatdavoudi | May 1986 | A |
4660336 | Cazaly et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4716917 | Schmidt | Jan 1988 | A |
4886446 | Courrege | Dec 1989 | A |
4945933 | Krajicek et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5048598 | Takemae et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5283990 | Shank, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5332312 | Evanson | Jul 1994 | A |
5456533 | Streiff et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5606995 | Raftis | Mar 1997 | A |
6016839 | Raftis et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6109778 | Wilmer | Aug 2000 | A |
6217207 | Streich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237629 | Zelch | May 2001 | B1 |
6464210 | Teran et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488402 | King et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6818124 | Simmons | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6821011 | Crump | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7025492 | Dorsch et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7252429 | Yungblut | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7309155 | Sarrouh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7517460 | Tormaschy et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7748650 | Sloan | Jul 2010 | B1 |
20020105855 | Behnke et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030205277 | Raftis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210606 | Chase et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050111297 | Sarrouh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050162972 | Dorsch et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060245295 | Dorsch et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291326 | Crump | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080130404 | Sarrouh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151684 | Lamon | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080151684 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11382110 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 11954692 | US |