The present invention relates to reinforcement of wooden roof structures of houses and low-rise buildings, and more particularly to a retrofitting apparatus and method for reinforcement of roof frame structures.
Many millions of houses and small buildings located in hurricane or tornado risk areas are at high risk of damage from the strong winds of hurricanes or tornadoes. Recent studies of hurricane damage indicate that the most extensive damage to a house occurs when the roof is torn off, allowing the rain which often accompanies strong winds to ruin the contents of the house, and often allowing walls to collapse.
There is a great need for affordable retrofitting methods for reinforcement of the connection of wooden roof frames to underlying walls. While prior art connectors of steel strip tie-down types excel as affordable connectors of roof structures to underlying walls in new construction of houses and small buildings, they are not as applicable to retrofitting of existing roof frame structures. Such connectors pose difficulties in retrofitting applications because an upper portion of the steel-strip tie should extend over the top of a rafter/truss and down the other side in order to ensure adequate tie-down strength, by applying the restraining force mainly at the top of the roof frame as compression across the grain, which wood withstands quite well. If the tie-down connectors are simply nailed into the side of the rafter/truss, as is common in the prior art, localized tensions are induced across the grain of the wood such that the rafter/truss member tends to split under high uplift pressures, which can release the connector's nails. This weakness is of special concern in the southern part of the U.S. “hurricane belt”, where roof slopes are typically low, which both exacerbates wind uplift forces while subjecting the wood to tension more directly across the grain.
The over-the-top method is now widely recommended or required in the “Hurricane Belt” of the United States, even for retrofits of existing buildings. During retrofitting however, accessing the top portion of the rafter/truss requires removal and re-installation of an area of roofing and sheathing, which are laborious and costly operations, and as such, tend to discourage such retrofit upgrading of existing housing and building stock.
Prior art efforts to devise retrofits for reinforcement of roof structures have also been made. A number of United States patents as examples of such efforts are briefly discussed below.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,257,483 (Netek) discloses some of the complications of retrofitting by installing anchor points in fascia and the wall below, allowing temporary placement of ties in the event of an impending storm. Winger, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,319,816, and several other inventors, disclose various temporary arrangements of multiple cables or nets over the roof which are anchored to the ground. Such temporary devices demand that the householder be at home and ready to react to storm warnings quickly and competently.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,311,708, Frye shows a retrofit roof tie-down method in which lag screws are installed upwardly through an angled steel plate into the lower edges of the rafter/trusses, a lower leg of the angled steel plate being lag-screwed into the underlying wall. Frye's lag screws into the narrow edge of the rafter/truss however invite splitting and cause tension failure. Furthermore, only the screws near the junction of rafter/trusses with the top of the wall would contribute effectively, and the usual absence of a stud directly under a rafter/truss would leave Frye's wall lag screws rather ineffective.
Thompson, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,763,634, tries to resolve the retrofit problem by inserting ties down through the roofing and sheathing from above, with one strip on each side of the rafter/truss to form a saddle across it, which is able to effectively hold down the roofing and sheathing together with the rafter/truss. Thompson's ties extend down to connect to the underlying wall below. All this entails laborious and uncertain sealing of the roof penetrations, and interferes with any subsequent re-roofing job.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved retrofitting apparatus and method for reinforcement of roof frame structures.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is an apparatus in combination with a wood frame roof structure, for retrofit connection of a roof frame to a support member below the roof frame, the apparatus comprising a claw member having a substantially flat plate pressing flat against a side surface of the roof frame, and a substantially flat load bearing flange integrated with a top edge of the plate and extending transversely away from the plate to form a free extremity end, the load bearing flange being driven substantially over a top of the roof frame, into an interface between said top and an underside of a roof sheathing attached to said top, for securing the roof frame; a tie-down member including a first plate having a portion placed flat against the plate of the claw member, and a second plate connected to the first plate; a connection device connecting the first plate of the tie-down member to the plate of the claw member; and wherein at least a portion of the second plate of the tie-down member is placed flat against and mounted to a vertical surface of the support member regardless of various angular positions of the load bearing flange with respect to the vertical surface of the support member.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is a kit for retrofit connection of a roof frame to a support member below the roof frame, the kit comprising a claw member having a substantially flat plate adapted for pressing flat against a side surface of the roof frame, and a substantially flat load bearing flange integrated with a top edge of the plate and extending transversely away from the plate to form a free extremity end, the load bearing flange adapted to be driven substantially over a top of the roof frame, into an interface between said top and an underside of a roof sheathing attached to said top, for securing the roof frame; a tie-down member including a first plate for being placed flat against and connected to the plate of the claw member and an opening defined through the first plate, and a second plate connected to the first plate, the second plate adapted to be mounted to a vertical surface of the support member; and a fastener for extending through an opening in the first plate of the tie-down member and an aperture in the plate of the claw member to connect the tie-down member to the claw member.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, there is a method of retrofit connection of a roof frame to a support member below the roof frame, a roof sheathing being fastened down to a top of the roof frame, the method comprising (a) placing a claw member which has a plate and a load bearing flange integrated with a top edge of the plate and extending transversely away from the plate to form a free extremity end, against a side of the roof frame in a selected location wherein the plate is angularly oriented relative to, and with a low edge of the plate resting against, the side of the roof frame while the free extremity of the load bearing flange rests against the side of the roof frame immediately bounded by a underside of the roof sheathing, the free extremity aligning with an interface of the roof frame and the roof sheathing; (b) driving the load bearing member into the interface of the roof frame and the roof sheathing until the plate of the claw member comes to rest flat against the side of the roof frame; (c) placing a tie-down member such that a first portion of the tie-down member rests against the plate of the claw member and a second portion of the tie-down member rests on a vertical surface of the support member; and (d) securing the first portion of the tie-down member to the plate of the claw member and securing the second portion of the tie-down member to the vertical surface of the support member.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
a is a top plan view of the claw member of
b is a side elevational view of the claw member of
c is a side elevational view of an alternative claw member similar to that of
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
Referring now to
The angular orientation of the claw member 24 causes the load bearing flange 26 to tilt slightly upward as shown, such that the free extremity 27 is directed essentially into the interface between the roof frame 10 and the roof sheathing panel 22.
As stated earlier, the load bearing flange 26 may be formed integrally with the mounting plate 28 to form an angle slightly less than a right angle, as shown, so that the load bearing flange 26 is induced to cut slightly downward into the top 12 of the roof frame 10 as it is driven inwardly from its rest position shown in
The free extremity 27 may be sharpened to a chisel-like point which makes it easier to drive the load bearing flange 26 inwardly, as will be discussed below. The sharpened free extremity 27 helps to ensure that the free extremity 27 cuts down into the top 12 of the roof frame 10 as it advances, and also reduces any tendency of the moving load bearing flange 26 to wedge the roof sheathing panel 22 significantly upward off the top 12 of the roof frame 10. The rounding of the bottom edge 30 of the mounting plate 28 also reduces any tendency of the bottom edge 30 to dig into the side 16 of the roof frame. Such digging-in action could cause the moving load bearing flange 26 to lift the roof sheathing 22 significantly upward, which lifting should be minimized. The downward-sloping stance of the load bearing flange 26 illustrated in
The material, for example galvanized steel, and thickness of the claw member 24 ensure that the whole claw member 24 is resistant to such flexing. The load bearing flange 26 advantageously transfers a restraining force downward into the roof frame 10 at the top edge 12 of the roof frame 10, causing a loading compression down across the wood grain through the greater part of the roof frame 10, thereby allowing a greater force to be exerted with no direct tensile component downward across the wood grain, and therefore greatly reduces the tendency to split and weaken the wood.
Premature failure of wood may be initiated generally along dotted lines as denoted by numeral 31 in
In
The fastener 35 could be a common wood screw or a through-bolt. The purpose of the fastener 35 is to pin the claw member 24 securely to the tie-down member 36 and to restrain the mounting plate 28 from moving outward under load. The fastener 35 need not take transverse load, and indeed the stiff action of the load bearing flange 26 will tend to minimize load transfer into the fastener 35, so that there is little or no tendency of the fastener 35 to split or otherwise weaken the roof frame 10.
It may be awkward to use a tool to drive the fastener 35 horizontally if the fastener 35 is positioned close to the roof sheathing panel 22. In practice, the fastener 35 may be driven inwardly and slightly upwardly into the roof frame, which provides convenience for operating a tool under the sheathing panel 22 and does not affect the function of the claw member 24 or the fastener 35.
As illustrated in
In most cases the first and second plates 38, 40 may be normal to each other. The second plate 40 is designed to reach downward to be placed flat against the surface 21 of the wall 20 as illustrated in
a illustrates an example of the load bearing flange 26 in plan view, in which the load bearing flange 26 defines one or more notches 45 extending inwardly from the chisel-shaped free extremity 27 thereof. The notches 45 facilitate driving the load bearing flange 26 into the interface between the roof sheathing panel 22 and the roof frame 10 and down into the top 12 of the frame 10. Furthermore, the notches 45 can help accommodate the rare instance where a roof sheathing nail (not shown) is encountered in the path of the advancing load bearing flange 26. In such an instance, the whole claw member 24 can be pried back out and simply moved a little to left or right along the roof frame 10, so that the advancing load bearing flange 26 now accommodates the nail's location within a notch 45 or misses the nail altogether.
In
In
As shown in
It is somewhat desirable to position the mounting hole 44 of the tie-down member 36 such that the line of restraining force from the claw member 24 passes through or close to the centre of the load bearing flange 26, despite the angular position of the claw member 24 in relation to the slope of the roof, which positioning is enabled by the elongated side-to-side aperture 32 as shown in
The embodiments shown in
Further alternative arrangements of apertures (not shown) can combine a side-to-side slot in the claw member 24, much as shown as 32 in
Embodiments such as shown in
Optionally, the apparatus can be supplied in pre-assembled form in which claw member 24 and tie-down member 36 are pre-connected to each other. An arrangement such as shown in
A rivet type of connector can be used wherever it is impractical or structurally undesirable to drive a connector substantially into the wood, such as through the high point 34′,
However, such pre-assembly can interfere somewhat with positioning the claw member 24 in the desired tilted position against the side 16 of the roof frame 10 as shown in
Caution is needed to avoid damaging such rivet or any type of connector placed generally where indicated by numeral 34′ in
Referring generally to
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art, will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departure from the scope of the described subject matter. For example, the embodiments described above and illustrated in the appended drawings are most appropriate for low slope applications (i.e. no slope to 4/12 slope roofs). However, the geometry of the claw member 24 may be modified to accommodate steeper roof slope applications without undue misalignment of the load path through the flange claw. Also, various types of tie-down members may be used in combination with the connector of this application such as the claw member. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the described subject matter will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This is a Continuation-in-Part application based on pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/748,588, filed on May 15, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
874514 | Lindow | Dec 1907 | A |
2911690 | Sanford | Nov 1959 | A |
3000145 | Fine | Sep 1961 | A |
3752512 | Gilb | Aug 1973 | A |
4525972 | Palacio et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4714372 | Commins | Dec 1987 | A |
4896985 | Commins | Jan 1990 | A |
5150553 | Commins et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5257483 | Netek | Nov 1993 | A |
5311708 | Frye | May 1994 | A |
5319896 | Winger | Jun 1994 | A |
5560156 | McDonald | Oct 1996 | A |
5595031 | Commins | Jan 1997 | A |
5641240 | Grieser et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5732524 | Kalker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5836131 | Viola et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5870861 | Gnaedinger | Feb 1999 | A |
5970677 | Masters et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6094880 | Thompson | Aug 2000 | A |
6230467 | Leek | May 2001 | B1 |
6295781 | Thompson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301855 | Aerni | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6658806 | Leek | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662517 | Thompson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6718698 | Thompson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6763634 | Thompson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7356973 | Roesset et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20040107653 | Collie | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060026907 | Gilstrap et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060213131 | Butzer | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Simpson Strong-Tie Wood Construction Connectors Catalogue C2005 (Internet address http://wwwstrongtie.com) (uploaded in 5 parts to EFS-Web due to the size of the document). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100043310 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11748588 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 12607154 | US |