This document relates generally to cardiac rhythm management (CRM) systems and particularly a system providing for intermittent cardiac stress augmentation pacing with delivery controlled for patient safety and therapy efficiency.
The heart is the center of a person's circulatory system. It includes an electro-mechanical system performing two major pumping functions. The left portions of the heart draw oxygenated blood from the lungs and pump it to the organs of the body to provide the organs with their metabolic needs for oxygen. The right portions of the heart draw deoxygenated blood from the organs and pump it into the lungs where the blood gets oxygenated. The pumping functions are accomplished by contractions of the myocardium (heart muscles). In a normal heart, the sinoatrial node, the heart's natural pacemaker, generates electrical impulses, known as action potentials that propagate through an electrical conduction system to various regions of the heart to excite myocardial tissues in these regions. Coordinated delays in the propagations of the action potentials in a normal electrical conduction system cause the various regions of the heart to contract in synchrony such that the pumping functions are performed efficiently.
A blocked or otherwise damaged electrical conduction system causes irregular contractions of the myocardium, a condition generally known as arrhythmia. Arrhythmia reduces the heart's pumping efficiency and hence, diminishes the blood flow to the body. A deteriorated myocardium has decreased contractility, also resulting in diminished blood flow. A heart failure patient usually suffers from both a damaged electrical conduction system and a deteriorated myocardium. The diminished blood flow results in insufficient blood supply to various body organs, preventing these organs to function properly and causing various symptoms.
Without timely and effective treatment, a cardiac disorder may develop to an extent that significantly lowers a patient's quality of life and threatens the patient's life. For example, heart failure may progress rapidly, with continuously deteriorating cardiac conditions and hemodynamic performance that could lead to inability to carry out daily activities and death. For these and other reasons, there is a need for controlling the progression of cardiac disorders, such as heart failure.
A cardiac pacing system controls the progression of a cardiac disorder such as heart failure by delivering cardiac stress augmentation pacing to create or augment regional stress in the heart according to a delivery schedule programmed for a patient. Various events associated with the patient's conditions, activities, and other treatments may render the cardiac stress augmentation pacing risky or ineffective. The system detects such events before and during each cardiac stress augmentation pacing session and modifies the delivery schedule in response to the detection of each event to ensure patient safety and therapy efficiency.
In one embodiment, a cardiac pacing system includes a pacing output circuit to deliver pacing pulses and a pacing control circuit to control the delivery of the pacing pulses. The pacing control circuit includes a memory circuit, an inhibitory signal input, and a stress augmentation pacing controller. A delivery schedule is stored on the memory circuit. The delivery schedule specifies timing of stress augmentation pacing sessions each including a session duration during which the pacing pulses are delivered using pacing parameters selected to augment cardiac stress to a level effective in slowing or stopping progression of a cardiac disorder. The inhibitory signal input receives an inhibitory signal. If the inhibitory signal is not present at a scheduled beginning of a stress augmentation pacing session, the stress augmentation pacing controller initiates that stress augmentation pacing session. If the inhibitory signal is present at the scheduled beginning of a stress augmentation pacing session, the stress augmentation pacing controller reschedules one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions.
In one embodiment, a method for operating a cardiac pacing system is provided. Before initiating a stress augmentation pacing session according to a delivery schedule, whether an inhibitory signal is present is determined. The stress augmentation pacing session includes a session duration during which pacing pulses are delivered from an implantable medical device using pacing parameters selected to augment cardiac stress to a level effective in slowing or stopping progression of a cardiac disorder. If the inhibitory signal is not present, the stress augmentation pacing session is initiated according to the delivery schedule. If the inhibitory signal is present, one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions are rescheduled.
This Summary is an overview of some of the teachings of the present application and not intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive treatment of the present subject matter. Further details about the present subject matter are found in the detailed description and appended claims. Other aspects of the invention will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description and viewing the drawings that form a part thereof. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, various embodiments discussed in the present document. The drawings are for illustrative purposes only and may not be to scale.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that the embodiments may be combined, or that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. References to “an”, “one”, or “various” embodiments in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references contemplate more than one embodiment. The following detailed description provides examples, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This document discusses a pacing system including an implantable medical device that controls progression of a cardiac disorder in a patient by applying therapy sessions during which cardiac stress augmentation pacing is delivered. The cardiac stress augmentation pacing (also referred to as “stress augmentation pacing” herein) creates or augments regional stress in the patient's heart, such as by selecting pacing parameters to increase the degree of ventricular asynchrony. During each therapy session, the pacing pulses are delivered according to a stress augmentation pacing sequence that includes alternating pacing and non-pacing periods or alternating periods of different pacing modes. The therapy sessions are initiated according to a programmed delivery schedule. However, the patient's physiological and pathological conditions, daily activities, and other medical treatments may not be precisely anticipated or planned for when the delivery schedule is programmed. Such conditions, daily activities, and treatments may potentially affect the safety and efficacy of the stress augmentation pacing. Therefore, the present system detects inhibitory events that may render the stress augmentation pacing ineffective and terminating events that may render the stress augmentation pacing harmful to the patient. If an inhibitory event is occurring at the time a therapy session is scheduled to begin, the present system modifies the delivery schedule to ensure efficiency of therapy. In response to the detection of a terminating event during a therapy session, the present system terminates that therapy session to ensure safety of the patient.
Implantable system 105 includes implantable medical device 110 and lead system 108. In various embodiments, implantable medical device 110 is an implantable CRM device including one or more of a pacemaker, a cardioverter/defibrillator, a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, a cardiac remodeling control therapy (RCT) device, a neruostimulator, a drug delivery device or a drug delivery controller, and a biological therapy device. As illustrated in
Implantable medical device 110 includes a cardiac pacing system 120 that intermittently delivers stress augmentation pacing to heart 101 while ensuring patent safety and therapy efficiency by monitoring and responding to the patient's various conditions and activities. In various embodiments, in addition to the stress augmentation pacing, implantable medical device 110 also delivers one or more other cardiac pacing therapies, such as bradycardia pacing therapy, CRT, and RCT. In one embodiment, implantable medical device 110 controls the delivery of one or more of other therapies such as neurostimulation therapy, drug therapy, and biologic therapy in coordination with the stress augmentation pacing. Various embodiments of cardiac pacing system 120 are further discussed below in this document.
Implantable medical device 110 includes a hermetically sealed can to house electronic circuitry that performs sensing and therapeutic functions. In one embodiment, cardiac pacing system 120 is housed within the hermetically sealed can. In another embodiment, cardiac pacing system 120 includes internal components housed within the hermetically sealed can and external components located external to the hermetically sealed can but communicatively coupled to the internal components.
External system 115 allows a user such as a physician or other caregiver or the patient to control the operation of implantable medical device 110 and obtain information acquired by implantable medical device 110. In one embodiment, external system 115 includes a programmer communicating with implantable medical device 110 bi-directionally via telemetry link 112. In another embodiment, external system 115 is a patient management system including an external device communicating with a remote device through a telecommunication network. The external device is within the vicinity of implantable medical device 110 and communicates with implantable medical device 110 bi-directionally via telemetry link 112. The remote device allows the user to monitor and treat a patient from a distant location.
Telemetry link 112 provides for data transmission from implantable medical device 110 to external system 115. This includes, for example, transmitting real-time physiological data acquired by implantable medical device 110, extracting physiological data acquired by and stored in implantable medical device 110, extracting therapy history data stored in implantable medical device 110, and extracting data indicating an operational status of implantable medical device 110 (e.g., battery status and lead impedance). Telemetry link 112 also provides for data transmission from external system 115 to implantable medical device 110. This includes, for example, programming implantable medical device 110 to acquire physiological data, programming implantable medical device 110 to perform at least one self-diagnostic test (such as for a device operational status), and programming implantable medical device 110 to deliver one or more therapies.
In various embodiments, cardiac pacing system 220, including its various elements in various embodiments, is implemented using a combination of hardware and software. In various embodiments, each element of cardiac pacing system 220 may be implemented using an application-specific circuit constructed to perform one or more specific functions or a general-purpose circuit programmed to perform such function(s). Such a general-purpose circuit includes, but is not limited to, a microprocessor or a portion thereof, or other programmable logic circuit or a portion thereof. In one embodiment, pacing control circuit 224 is implemented as a microprocessor-based circuit programmed to perform various functions selected from those discussed in this document.
In one embodiment, the stress augmentation pacing sessions each include alternating non-pacing and pacing periods. The non-pacing periods each have a non-pacing duration during which no pacing pulse is timed to be delivered. The pacing periods each have a specified pacing duration during which a plurality of pacing pulses is timed to be delivered using pacing parameters selected to augment cardiac stress to a level effective for slowing or stopping progression of a cardiac disorder. In another embodiment, the stress augmentation pacing sessions each include alternating first and second pacing periods. The first pacing periods each have a first pacing duration during which a plurality of pacing pulses is timed to be delivered according to a first pacing mode. The second pacing periods each have a second pacing duration during which a plurality of pacing pulses is timed to be delivered according to a second pacing mode, using pacing parameters selected to augment cardiac stress to a level effective for slowing or stopping progression of a cardiac disorder. In various embodiments, delivery schedule 232 also specifies pacing parameters used in each of the stress augmentation pacing sessions.
Pacing control circuit 324 represents an embodiment of pacing control circuit 224 and includes inhibitory signal input 226, a terminating signal input 334, memory circuit 228, and a stress augmentation pacing controller 330. Inhibitory signal input 226 receives the inhibitory signal. Terminating signal input 334 receives a terminating signal. Stress augmentation pacing controller 330 initiates each stress augmentation pacing session according to delivery schedule 232 when the inhibitory signal is not present at the scheduled beginning of that stress augmentation pacing session, and reschedules one or more of the stress augmentation pacing sessions when the inhibitory signal is present at the scheduled beginning of that stress augmentation pacing session. The rescheduling includes modification of the timing for initiating the subsequent one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions. In one embodiment, the rescheduling also includes adjustment of the pacing parameters used in the subsequent one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions, in addition to the modification of the timing for initiating the subsequent one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions. Stress augmentation pacing controller 330 times the delivery of the pacing pulses during each stress augmentation pacing session after the session is initiated. In response to the terminating signal received during a stress augmentation pacing session, stress augmentation pacing controller 330 terminates that session.
Inhibitory event detector 340 detects inhibitory events and produces the inhibitory signal in response to the detection of at least one of the inhibitory events. The inhibitory events are each associated with a physiologic condition, a pathologic condition, or a medical treatment considered as potentially reducing effectiveness of the stress augmentation pacing. In various embodiments, inhibitory event detector 340 detects each of the inhibitory events from a physiological signal or a user signal. The physiological signal is sensed by a sensor of physiological sensor(s) 336. The user signal is received by user input receiver 338 from a user such as the patient.
Terminating event detector 342 detects terminating events and produces the terminating signal in response to the detection of at least one of the terminating events. The terminating events are each associated with a physiologic condition, a pathologic condition, or a medical treatment considered to potentially compromise safety of stress augmentation pacing. In various embodiments, terminating event detector 342 detects each of the terminating events from a physiological signal or a user signal. The physiological signal is sensed by a sensor of physiological sensor(s) 336. The user signal is received by user input receiver 338 from a user such as the patient. In one embodiment, one or more types of the terminating events are also used as the inhibitory events.
In various embodiments, one or more sensors of physiological sensor(s) 336 are incorporated into or onto implantable medical device 110, incorporated into one or more implantable leads of lead system 108, and/or communicatively coupled to implantable medical device 110 via conductors or telemetry. Examples of physiological sensor(s) 336 are discussed below with reference to
User input receiver 338 receives the user signals. In one embodiment, external system 115 includes a user input device to receive the user signals. In various embodiments, the user signals indicate the patient's intake of drug and/or food. The stress augmentation pacing may be ineffective or harmful to the patient for a period of time following administration of certain drugs such as Beta-blocker, satins, and insulin. The stress augmentation pacing may also be ineffective or harmful to the patient with a high blood glucose level, such as during a period of time following a meal. Thus, examples of the user signals include a drug signal indicative of an administration of a specified type drug and a food signal indicative of substantial food consumption. In one embodiment, inhibitory event detector 340 produces the inhibitory signal in response to the receipt of the user signal. In one embodiment, the inhibitory signal is present for a programmed period of time following the receipt of the user signal. In one embodiment, terminating event detector 342 produces the terminating signal in response to the receipt of the user signal.
Temperature sensor 444 senses body temperature of the patient. The stress augmentation pacing is likely ineffective when the patient's body temperature is high, such as during fever, inflammation, or exercise. In various embodiments, temperature sensor 444 is incorporated into implantable medical device 110 or lead system 108 Inhibitory event detector 340 produces the inhibitory signal when the body temperature exceeds a specified threshold temperature. In one embodiment, the inhibitory signal is present while the temperature is above the specified threshold temperature.
Glucose sensor 446 senses a glucose signal indicative of a blood glucose level of the patient. The stress augmentation pacing therapy may be ineffective when the patient's blood glucose level is high, such as when the patient has diabetes. Inhibitory event detector 340 produces the inhibitory signal when the blood glucose level exceeds a specified threshold level. In one embodiment, the inhibitory signal is present while the blood glucose level is above the specified threshold level.
Cardiac sensing circuit 448 senses one or more cardiac signals for controlling delivery of the pacing pulses and for cardiac ischemia detection. If acute cardiac ischemia develops during a stress augmentation pacing session, the session is to be terminated. ST elevation is used as an indication of ischemia. Terminating event detector 342 produces the terminating signal in response to the amplitude of an ST segment of at least one cardiac signal of the one or more cardiac signals exceeding a specified threshold amplitude.
Respiratory sensor 450 senses one or more respiratory signals indicative of one or more respiratory parameters. A change in the patient's breathing pattern may indicate that the patient's heart is overly stressed to a potentially harmful level by the stress augmentation pacing. In one embodiment, respiratory sensor 450 includes an impedance sensor. In one embodiment, respiratory sensor 450 includes a minute ventilation sensor that is also used for pacing rate control under a rate-adaptive pacing mode. Terminating event detector 342 produces the terminating signal in response to a substantial change in the respiratory pattern as indicated by a substantial change in one or more values of the one or more respiratory parameters.
Blood viscosity sensor 452 senses a signal indicative of a blood viscosity. A high blood viscosity indicates that the patient is dehydrated and should not receive the stress augmentation pacing Inhibitory event detector 340 produces the inhibitory signal when the blood viscosity exceeds a specified threshold level. In one embodiment, the inhibitory signal is present while the blood viscosity is above the specified threshold level.
PH sensor 454 senses a blood pH value. A high blood acidity (i.e., low pH) level indicates that the patient is overly stressed and should not receive the stress augmentation pacing. Inhibitory event detector 340 produces the inhibitory signal when the blood pH value is below a specified threshold value. In one embodiment, the inhibitory signal is present while the blood pH value is below the specified threshold level.
Pressure sensor 456 senses a blood pressure and/or changes in the blood pressure. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressures naturally vary between heart beats and vary in a circadian rhythm. They change in response to stress, nutritional factors, drugs, disease, exercise, and momentarily from standing up. Acute bouts of hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure) indicates that mechanical stress on the heart may be abnormally high, and that the heart may not respond to the stress augmentation pacing or may respond negatively to the stress augmentation pacing. Hypotension (abnormally low blood pressure) indicates that cardiac output may be low, and thus the stress augmentation pacing may be dangerous for further decreasing the cardiac output. Inhibitory event detector 340 produces the inhibitory signal when the change in blood pressure exceeds a specified threshold value, and/or when the blood pressure is below a specified value.
While each sensor illustrated on
In one embodiment, the first pacing period is a non-pacing period having a first pacing duration during which no pacing pulse is timed to be delivered according to a non-pacing mode, and the second pacing period is a stress augmentation pacing period having a second pacing duration during which pacing pulses are timed to be delivered according to a stress augmentation pacing mode. When a pacing pulse is timed to be delivered, it will be delivered unless being inhibited by a detected intrinsic cardiac depolarization occurring before the scheduled delivery of the pacing pulse during a cardiac cycle. Under the non-pacing mode according to which no pacing pulse is timed to be delivered, the non-delivery is due to programming rather than inhibition by a detected intrinsic cardiac depolarization. Under the stress augmentation pacing mode, pacing pulses are delivered to augment mechanical stress on the myocardium to a level effecting cardioprotection against myocardial injury or deterioration. In various embodiments, the stress augmentation pacing mode is a standard or non-standard pacing mode with pacing parameter values selected for the desired level of myocardial stress augmentation according to the patients' needs, conditions, and responses. In one embodiment, the stress augmentation pacing mode is an atrial tracking pacing mode with an atrioventricular (AV) pacing delay that is substantially shorter than the patient's intrinsic AV conduction interval. In another embodiment, the stress augmentation pacing mode is a bradycardia pacing mode with a pacing rate substantially higher than the patient's intrinsic heart rate. In another embodiment, the stress augmentation pacing mode is an asynchronous pacing mode with a pacing rate substantially higher than the patient's intrinsic heart rate.
In another embodiment, the first pacing period is a back-up pacing period having a first pacing duration during which pacing pulses are timed to be delivered according to a back-up pacing mode, and the second pacing period is a stress augmentation pacing period having a second pacing duration during which the delivery of the pacing pulse is controlled according to the stress augmentation pacing mode. In one embodiment, the backup pacing mode is a chronic pacing mode that is substantially different from the stress augmentation pacing mode and applied before and/or after the stress augmentation pacing session. In one embodiment, the back-up pacing mode is an anti-bradycardia pacing mode according to which pacing pulses are timed to be delivered as an anti-bradycardia therapy. In another embodiment, the back-up pacing mode is a cardiac resynchronization mode according to which pacing pulses are timed to be delivered as a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In another embodiment, the back-up pacing mode is a cardiac remodeling control mode according to which pacing pulses are timed to be delivered as a cardiac remodeling control therapy (RCT).
In various embodiments, the session frequency (or period), the number of the cycles (N), the first pacing period, and the second pacing period are each programmable. In one embodiment, the session frequency is programmable between approximately 1 and 12 sessions each day. The number of cycles (N) for each stress augmentation pacing session is programmable between approximately 3 and 12 cycles. The first and second pacing periods are each programmable between approximately 5 and 16 minutes. In one embodiment, the first pacing duration is substantially equal to the second pacing duration. In various embodiments, the values of these parameters are determined based on the patient's physiological and pathological conditions, tolerance to the stress augmentation pacing therapy, and responsiveness to the stress augmentation pacing therapy known to associate with certain values or value ranges of the parameters. For example, the patient may need a relatively large number of stress augmentation pacing sessions each with a relatively low intensity (i.e., relatively low level of elevation or duration of cardiac stress augmentation), or a relatively small number of stress augmentation pacing sessions each with a relatively high intensity.
At 602, the inhibitory events are detected. In various embodiments, the inhibitory events are each detected from a physiological signal sensed by a physiological sensor or a user signal received from a user such as a physician or other caregiver or the patient receiving the stress augmentation pacing. Examples of the inhibitory events include high body temperature, high blood glucose level, high blood viscosity, high blood acidity, recent dose of specified drugs, and recent food consumption, as discussed above with reference to
At 604, the terminating events are detected. In various embodiments, the terminating events are also each detected from a physiological signal sensed by a physiological sensor or a user signal received from a user such as a physician or other caregiver or the patient receiving the stress augmentation pacing. Examples of the terminating events include acute cardiac ischemia, excessive cardiac stress, recent dose of specified drugs, and recent food consumption, as discussed above with reference to
At 610, if a stress augmentation pacing session is to be initiated at 606 according to the delivery schedule, and no inhibitory event is detected at 608, the stress augmentation pacing session is initiated. At 612, the stress augmentation pacing is delivered. If a stress augmentation pacing session is to be initiated according to the delivery schedule at 606, but an inhibitory event is detected at 608, the delivery schedule is modified by rescheduling one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions at 620. In one embodiment, the delivery schedule is further modified by adjusting pacing parameters for the one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions.
At 618, if the stress augmentation pacing session has not been completed at 614, but a terminating event is detected at 616, the stress augmentation pacing session is terminated. If the stress augmentation pacing session has not been completed at 614, and no terminating event is detected at 616, the delivery at 612 continues until the session is completed at 614. After the session is completed at 614 without being terminated by the terminating event, the next session is to be initiated according to the delivery schedule. In one embodiment, if a session is prematurely terminated by the terminating event at 618, the next session is still to be initiated according to the delivery schedule. In another embodiment, if a session is prematurely terminated by the terminating event at 618, the delivery schedule is modified by rescheduling one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions at 620, when the detection of the terminating event indicates or suggests that the patient may benefit from the modification. In one embodiment, the delivery schedule is further modified by adjusting pacing parameters for the one or more stress augmentation pacing sessions.
It is to be understood that the above detailed description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading and understanding the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/181,991, filed on May 28, 2009, under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is related to co-pending, commonly assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/682,448, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CLOSED-LOOP INTERMITTENT STRESS AUGMENTATION PACING,” filed on Mar. 6, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3650277 | Sjostrand et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
4587975 | Salo et al. | May 1986 | A |
4722342 | Amundson | Feb 1988 | A |
4730619 | Koning et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4791931 | Slate | Dec 1988 | A |
4834710 | Fleck | May 1989 | A |
4919133 | Chiang | Apr 1990 | A |
5007427 | Sukuki et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5014702 | Alt | May 1991 | A |
5024222 | Thacker | Jun 1991 | A |
5058584 | Bourgeois | Oct 1991 | A |
5072458 | Suzuki | Dec 1991 | A |
5111818 | Suzuki et al. | May 1992 | A |
5135004 | Adams et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5184615 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5199428 | Obel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5282840 | Hudrlik et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5313953 | Yomtov et al. | May 1994 | A |
5360436 | Alt et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5376106 | Stahmann et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391188 | Nelson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5484419 | Fleck | Jan 1996 | A |
5531768 | Alferness | Jul 1996 | A |
5588432 | Crowley | Dec 1996 | A |
5634899 | Shapland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649968 | Alt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5755671 | Albrecht et al. | May 1998 | A |
5824021 | Rise | Oct 1998 | A |
5919209 | Schouten | Jul 1999 | A |
6021350 | Mathson | Feb 2000 | A |
6058331 | King | May 2000 | A |
6104956 | Naritoku et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108577 | Benser | Aug 2000 | A |
6115628 | Stadler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6208894 | Schulman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233486 | Ekwall et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238422 | Van Oort | May 2001 | B1 |
6256538 | Ekwall | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272379 | Fischell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278894 | Salo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285907 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314323 | Ekwall et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368284 | Bardy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408208 | Sun | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411845 | Mower | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6445953 | Bulkes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477402 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501983 | Natarajan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6569145 | Shmulewitz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6584362 | Scheiner et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6604000 | Lu | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610713 | Tracey | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6628988 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6711436 | Duhaylongsod | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735479 | Fabian et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6763267 | Ding | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6813516 | Ujhelyi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827690 | Bardy | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838471 | Tracey | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842642 | Vanhout | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845267 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865420 | Kroll | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6892095 | Salo | May 2005 | B2 |
6907285 | Denker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913577 | Bardy | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6937899 | Sheldon et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950701 | Begemann et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6965797 | Pastore et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973349 | Salo | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7010345 | Hill et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025730 | Cho et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039462 | Pastore et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043305 | Kenknight et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062314 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062325 | Krig et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7069070 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072711 | Girouard et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092755 | Florio | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7158832 | Kieval et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171258 | Goode | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215992 | Stahmann et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7215997 | Yu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7277761 | Shelchuk | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295874 | Prinzen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299087 | Bardy | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7333854 | Brewer et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340303 | Zhu | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7364547 | Stahmann et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366568 | Pastore et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7437191 | Pastore et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450988 | Ross et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460906 | Libbus | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479112 | Sweeney et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486991 | Libbus et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7668594 | Brockway et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7711420 | Baynham et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20020026222 | Schauerte et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042632 | Iaizzo et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072776 | Osorio et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072777 | Lu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082660 | Stahmann et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091415 | Lovett et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123772 | Sun et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128563 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030004549 | Hill et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009189 | Gilson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045908 | Condie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055461 | Girouard et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060854 | Zhu | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105493 | Salo | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120313 | Begemann et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120315 | Spinelli et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139778 | Fischell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158492 | Sheldon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158584 | Cates et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030199956 | Struble et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204206 | Padua et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204231 | Hine et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229380 | Adams et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233130 | Padmanabhan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015081 | Kramer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040038947 | Wink et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049235 | Deno et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040088015 | Casavant et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088017 | Sharma et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102815 | Balczewski et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106960 | Siejko et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040106961 | Siejko et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133247 | Stahmann et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040230240 | Sun et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255956 | Vinten-Johansen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004476 | Payvar et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038345 | Gorgenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043675 | Pastore et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065568 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075673 | Warkentin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090719 | Scheiner et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096705 | Pastore et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096706 | Salo | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131467 | Boveja | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137631 | Yu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143779 | Libbus | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143780 | Henry et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149126 | Libbus | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149127 | Libbus | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149129 | Libbus et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171589 | Lau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197674 | McCabe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050261741 | Libbus et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283195 | Pastore et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288721 | Girouard et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020294 | Brockway et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030892 | Kadhiresan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060116593 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136049 | Rojo | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149326 | Prinzen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195038 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206158 | Wu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241357 | Chirife | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241704 | Shuros et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247686 | Girouard et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247700 | Jackson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247702 | Stegemann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253156 | Pastore et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259087 | Baynham et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259088 | Pastore et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271119 | Ni et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282000 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287684 | Baynham et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021789 | Pastore et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021790 | Kieval et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021798 | Kieval et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038260 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038261 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038262 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043393 | Brockway et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049835 | Goode | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054871 | Pastore et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060972 | Kieval et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070142864 | Libbus et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142871 | Libbus et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150005 | Sih et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150015 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162081 | Yu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167984 | Kieval et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179392 | Zhang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191892 | Mullen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233192 | Craig | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239218 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282380 | Brooke et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299356 | Wariar et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004669 | Sathaye et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015659 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021507 | Libbus et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027495 | Prinzen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058661 | Bardy | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058881 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071315 | Baynham et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081354 | Qu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082135 | Arcot-Krishnamurthy et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091138 | Pastore et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080132972 | Shuros et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140141 | Ben-David et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167694 | Bolea et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177156 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177191 | Patangay et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177194 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215105 | Pastore et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221636 | Pastore et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234774 | Baynham et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090025459 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048641 | Libbus | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082781 | Tran et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090124916 | Sweeney et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090192560 | Arcot-Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234401 | Zielinski et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090281591 | Shuros et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090318984 | Mokelke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016913 | Arcot-Krishnamurthy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016916 | Arcot-Krishnamurthy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100130913 | Baynham et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110071584 | Mokelke et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0547734 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0879618 | Nov 1998 | EP |
2000078391 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1437159 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1690566 | Aug 2006 | EP |
WO-9302745 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO-9518649 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO-0078391 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0115609 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0124876 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0128625 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0176689 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-03082080 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004024229 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO-2004058326 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2005042091 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2006074189 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006079010 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006105474 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2006115693 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006115693 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006121842 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006124636 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006124729 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007078410 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007133962 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008063396 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008109040 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/682,448, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2010”, 17 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/002799, International Search Report mailed Oct. 15, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/002799, Invitation to Pay Fees and Partial International Search Report mailed Jul. 14, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/002799, Written Opinion mailed Oct. 15, 2008”, 11 pgs. |
Airaksinen, K. E., et al., “Antiarrhythmic effect of repeated coronary occlusion during balloon angioplasty”, J Am Coll Cardiol., 29(5), (Apr. 1997), 1035-1038. |
Amende, I., “Hemodynamics in ischemia: diastolic phase”, Z. kardiol., 73 Suppl 2, [Article in German With English Abstract], (1984), 127-33. |
Andersen, H, et al., “Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome”, Lancet, 350(9086), (Oct. 25, 1997), 1210-6. |
Baynham, Tamara C, et al., “Integrated Catheter and Pulse Generator Systems and Methods”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/468,875, filed Aug. 31, 2006, 23 Pages. |
Benchimol, A, et al., “Cardiac hemodynamics during stimulation of the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle in normal and abnormal hearts”, Circulation, 33(6), (Jun. 1966), 933-44. |
Dzwonczyk, R., et al., “Myocardial electrical impedance responds to ischemia and reperfusion in humans”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51(12), (Dec. 2004), 2206-2209. |
Girouard, Steven D., “Pulmonary Vein Stent for Treating Atrial Fibrillation”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/298,741, filed Jun. 15, 2001, 14 pgs. |
Grassi, Guido, et al., “Baroreflex and non-baroreflex modulation of vagal cardiac control after myocardial infarction”, Am J Cardiol., 84(5), (Sep. 1, 1999), 525-9. |
Henriques, Jose P., et al., “Outcome of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction during routine duty hours versus during off-hours”, J Am Coll Cardiol, 41(12), (Jun. 18, 2003), 2138-2142. |
Ishihara, M., et al., “Implications of prodromal angina pectoris in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction: acute angiographic findings and long-term prognosis”, J Am Coll Cardiol., 30(4), (1997), 970-5. |
Kin, Hajime, et al., “Postconditioning attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting events in the early minutes of reperfusion”, Cardiovascular Research, 62(1), (Apr. 1, 2004), 74-85. |
Kis, A., “Repeated cardiac pacing extends the time during which canine hearts are protected against ischaemia-induced arrhythmias : role of nitric oxide.”, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 31(6), (Jun. 1999), 1229-1241. |
Kloner, R. A., et al., “Prospective temporal analysis of the onset of preinfarction angina versus outcome: an ancillary study in TIMI-9B”, Circulation, 97(11), (1998), 1042-5. |
Koning, M M, “Rapid ventricular pacing produces myocardial protection by nonischemic activation of KATP+ channels”, Circulation, 93(1), (Jan. 1, 1996), 178-186. |
Krayenbuhl, H. P., “Hemodynamics in ischemia. Systolic phase”, Z. Kardiol., 73 Suppl 2, [Article in German with English Abstract], (1984), 119-25. |
Leclercq, C, et al., “Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing”, Am Heart J., 129(6), (Jun. 1995), 1133-41. |
Loukogeorgakis, S. P., et al., “Remote ischemic preconditioning provides early and late protection against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans: role of the autonomic nervous system.”, J Am Coll Cardiol., 46(3), (Aug. 2, 2005), 450-6. |
Makhoul, John, “Linear Prediction: A Tutorial Review”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 63, (Apr. 1975), 561-580. |
Meier, B., et al., “Coronary Pacing During Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty”, Circulation, 71(3), (Mar. 1985), 557-561. |
Murry, C. E., et al., “Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium”, Circulation, 74(5), (1986), 1124-1136. |
Ovize, M., et al., “Stretch preconditions canine myocardium.”, Am J Physiol., 266(1 Pt 2), (Jan. 1994), H137-46. |
Panju, Akbar A, et al., “Is This Patient Having a Myocardial Infraction?”, JAMA, 280(14), (Oct. 14, 1998), 1256-1263. |
Patangay, Ahilash, et al., “Ischemia Detection Using Heart Sound Timing”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/625,003, filed Jan. 19, 2007, 69 Pages. |
Prinzen, Frits W, “Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 33(6), (May 1999), 1735-1742. |
Rosa, A., et al., “Ectopic Pacing at Physiological Rate Improves Postanoxic Recovery of the Developing Heart”, Am. J. Physiol.—Heart Circ. Physiol., 284, (2003), H2384-H2392. |
Rosenqvist, M, et al., “The effect of ventricular activation sequence on cardiac performance during pacing”, Pacing and Electrophysiology, 19(9), (1996), 1279-1286. |
Salerno, D. M., “Seismocardiography for monitoring changes in left ventricular function during ischemia.”, Chest, 100(4), (Oct. 1991), 991-3. |
Solomon, S. D., et al., “Angina pectoris prior to myocardial infarction protects against subsequent left ventricular remodeling”, J Am Coll Cardiol., 43(9), (2004), 1511-4. |
Tavel, Morton E, “The Appearance of Gallop Rhythm after Exercise Stress Testing”, Clin. Cardiol., vol. 19, (1996), 887-891. |
Tsang, A., et al., “Postconditioning: a form of “modified reperfusion” protects the myocardium by activating the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway”, Circ Res., 95(3), Epub Jul. 8, 2004, (Aug. 6, 2004, 230-2. |
Vanagt, W. Y. R., et al., “Ventricular Pacing for Improving Myocardial Tolerance to Ischemic”, Progress Report on Project Guidant-CARIM, (Oct. 2003), 1-25. |
Vegh, A, et al., “Transient ischaemia induced by rapid cardiac pacing results in myocardial preconditioning”, Cardiovascular Research, 25(12), (Dec. 1991), 1051-3. |
Wu, Zhong-Kai, et al., “Ischemic preconditioning suppresses ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial revascularization”, Circulation, 106(24), (Dec. 10, 2002), 3091-3096. |
Yang, S. M., et al., “Multiple, brief coronary occlusions during early reperfusion protect rabbit hearts by targeting cell signaling pathways”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 44(5), (Sep. 1, 2004), 1103-1110. |
Zhao, Zhi-Qing, et al., “Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning”, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 285(2), (Aug. 2003), H579-H588. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/681,448, Response filed May 14, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/682,448, Advisory Action mailed Mar. 25, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/682,448, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/682,448, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 20, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/682,448, Response filed Mar. 4, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,622, Response filed Sep. 12, 2013 to Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 21, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,622, Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 21, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,622, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,622, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 15, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,622, Response filed Mar. 25, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100305648 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61181991 | May 2009 | US |