Embodiments described relate to a packer assembly. In particular, equipment and techniques for triggering a hydraulic setting module of the assembly are described. More specifically, electronic equipment and techniques may be utilized for such triggering without reliance on potentially more stressful hydraulic triggering.
Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming, and ultimately very expensive endeavors. As a result, over the years, a significant amount of added emphasis has been placed on overall well architecture, monitoring and follow on interventional maintenance. Indeed, perhaps even more emphasis has been directed at minimizing costs associated with applications in furtherance of well construction, monitoring and maintenance. All in all, careful attention to the cost effective and reliable execution of such applications may help maximize production and extend well life. Thus, a substantial return on the investment in the completed well may be better ensured.
In line with the objectives of maximizing cost effectiveness and overall production, the well may be of a fairly sophisticated architecture. For example, the well may be tens of thousands of feet deep, traversing various formation layers, and zonally isolated throughout. That is to say, packers may be intermittently disposed about production tubing which runs through the well so as to isolate various well regions or zones from one another. Thus, production may be extracted from certain zones through the production tubing, but not others. Similarly, production tubing that terminates adjacent a production region is generally anchored or immobilized in place thereat by a mechanical packer, irrespective of any zonal isolation.
A packer, such as the noted mechanical packer, may be secured near the terminal end of the production tubing and equipped with a setting mechanism. The setting mechanism may be configured to drive the packer from a lower profile to a radially enlarged profile. Thus, the tubing may be advanced within the well and into position with the packer in a reduced or lower profile. Subsequently, the packer may be enlarged to secure the tubing in place adjacent the production region.
Once the production tubing is in place, activation of the setting mechanism is generally hydraulically triggered. More specifically, the mechanism is equipped with a trigger that is responsive to a given degree of pressure induced in the well. So, for example, surface equipment and pumps adjacent the well head at surface may be employed to induce between about 3,000 and 4,000 PSI in the well. Depending on the location of the trigger for the setting mechanism, this driving up of pressure may take place through the bore of the production tubing or through the annulus between the tubing and the wall of the well.
Unfortunately, the noted hydraulic manner of driving up pressure for triggering of the setting mechanism may place significant stress on the production tubing. For example, where the hydraulic pressure is induced through the tubing bore, the strain on the tubing may lead to ballooning. Furthermore, the strain on the tubing may have long term effects. That is to say, even long after setting the packer, strain placed on the tubing during the hydraulic setting of the packer may result in failure, for example, during production operations. To avoid such a catastrophic event, whenever pressure tolerances are detectably exceeded, the entire production tubing string and packer assembly may be removed, examined, and another deployment of production equipment undertaken. Ultimately, this may eat up a couple of days' time and upwards of $100,000 in expenses.
In order to avoid the costly scenario of having to remove and re-deploy the entire production string, other manners of packer setting are available. For example, a dedicated hydraulic control line may be run to the setting mechanism from surface. Indeed, this may already be done where the production tubing is open to the well, rendering well hydraulics unavailable for triggering of the mechanism. Regardless, a dedicated hydraulic line to the setting mechanism means that exposure of the production tubing to dramatic pressure increases for packer deployment is eliminated. Thus, the possibility of tubing failure in the future due to prior hydraulic strain is reduced.
Unfortunately, the utilization of a dedicated hydraulic line for the setting mechanism only shifts the concerns over hydraulic deployment from potential production tubing issues to issues with other downhole production equipment. For example, a dedicated hydraulic line is itself an added piece of production equipment. Thus, it comes with its own added expenses and failure modes. Indeed, due to the fact that a new piece of equipment is introduced, the possibility of defective production string equipment is inherently increased even before a setting application is run. Once more, where such defectiveness results in a failure, the same amount of time and expenses may be lost in removal and re-deployment of the production string. Thus, the advantages obtained from protecting the production tubing by utilization of a dedicated hydraulic line for the setting mechanism may be negligible at best.
A pressure set packer assembly is provided with a packer disposed about a tubular. A pressure gauge is also secured to the tubular and in electrical communication with surface equipment over an electrical line. Further, a packer setting mechanism is coupled to the packer and the line for electrical surface controlled triggering of setting of the packer.
Embodiments herein are described with reference to certain electrically triggered packers and setting assemblies. For example, assemblies utilized in conjunction with production tubing are depicted herein. However, a variety of alternate assemblies utilizing packer isolation and/or anchoring may take advantage of electrically triggered setting techniques detailed herein. Indeed, any packer assembly which make use of downhole electrical gauges may be particularly benefitted by electrical trigging equipment and techniques described below.
Referring now to
Unlike other conventional hydraulic packer setting mechanisms, the trigger 130 of the mechanism 150 depicted in
Continuing with reference to
Referring now to
With reference to
As noted above, and is apparent from the use of an electrical line 115, the trigger 130 is electrically actuated to initiate the setting depicted in
The setting mechanism 150 may operate as an intensifier as would likely be the case for a conventional packer setting assembly. That is, aside from modifications for accommodating the electronic trigger 130, as described above, the setting mechanism 150 may otherwise be a conventional off-the-shelf hydrostatic set module (HSM), for example. Such a module is detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,712, Setting Tool for Hydraulically Actuated Devices, to Cho, et al., incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Referring now to
Continuing with reference to
A control unit 360 is also located at the oilfield surface 300. Among other things, the unit 360 may be utilized in directing the setting of the packer 175 via the setting mechanism 150 as described above. More specifically, the electrical line 115 detailed above may be run from the unit 360 and into electrical communication with the trigger 130 of the mechanism 150 as described with reference to
Referring now to
The above noted line extension 400 may make up an additional 10 to 40 feet or so of wiring between a location near the gauge 120 and the trigger 130. Further, the coupling of the extension 400 to the line 115 may be configured as a feedthrough. In this manner, exposure by the trigger 130 or extension 400 to water and other downhole fluids should not carry over to such an exposure by the gauge 120. Thus, the reliability of readings obtained by the gauge 120 and detected at surface may be better ensured. Similarly, to prevent gauge readings from being affected by the setting mechanism 150, the noted fuse 125 is provided to eventually sever the extension 400 downhole of the gauge 120 as detailed below.
Referring now to
The above described trigger 130 may be of a conventional dump bailer or e-trigger variety. Additionally, actuation of the trigger 130 as described above may be achieved by reversing polarity over the line 115 so as to protect the gauge 120. Signal may then be sent over the line 115 and extension 400 to the trigger 130 for initiating of the setting application. Similarly, the end of setting may be detected over the line 115 and extension 400 thereby allowing for a return to standard operating polarity and monitoring relative the gauge 120.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Deployment of the assembly may also include setting of a packer, for example, to anchor and isolate production tubing, again as depicted in
Embodiments described hereinabove reduce the likelihood of having to remove and re-deploy an entire production string as a result of hydraulic strain induced on tubing due to packer setting. This is achieved in a manner that does not require the presence of a dedicated hydraulic line run from surface to the setting mechanism. Thus, concern over the introduction of new failure modes is eliminated. Furthermore, techniques for packer setting as detailed herein utilize an electric line that may already be in place as part of sensing equipment deployed with the production string at the outset of completions.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
This Patent Document claims priority under 35 U.S.C.§119 to U.S. Provisional App. Ser. No. 61/295,930, filed on Jan. 18, 2010, and entitled, “Method and Apparatus for Setting a Packer”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5207272 | Pringle et al. | May 1993 | A |
7458420 | Rioufol et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7562712 | Cho et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20020062991 | Farrant et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030024704 | Hirsch et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040040707 | Dusterhoft et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050087344 | Toekje et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2011/021452 on Jun. 28, 2011, 5 pages. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2011/021452 on Jun. 28, 2011, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120181050 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61295930 | Jan 2010 | US |