The invention relates to a method and apparatus for the sorting of particles in a suspension, where the input flow path of a sorting module can be split into several output channels. More particular, the invention relates to a particle sorting system in which a plurality of sorting modules are interconnected as to yield an increased particle throughput.
In the fields of biotechnology, and especially cytology and drug screening, there is a need for high throughput sorting of particles. Examples of particles that require sorting are various types of cells, such as blood platelets, white blood cells, tumorous cells, embryonic cells and the like. These particles are especially of interest in the field of cytology. Other particles are (macro) molecular species such as proteins, enzymes and poly-nucleotides. This family of particles is of particular interest in the field of drug screening during the development of new drugs.
Methods and apparatuses for particle sorting are known, and the majority described in the prior art work in the condition where the particles are suspended in a liquid flowing through a channel network having at least a branch point downstream and are operated according the detect-decide-deflect principle. The moving particle is first analyzed for a specific characteristic, such as optical absorption, fluorescent intensity, size etc. Depending on the outcome of this detection phase, it is decided how the particle will be handled further with. The outcome of the decision is then applied to deflect the direction of specific particle towards a predetermined branch of the channel network.
Of importance is the throughput of the sorting apparatus, i.e. how many particles can be sorted per unit of time. Typical sorting rates for sorters employing flows of particle suspension in closed channels are in the range from a few hundred particles per second to thousands of particles per second, for a single sorting unit.
An example of a sorting device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,175,662, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference. In the '662 patent, a flow of particles, cells in this case, flows through the center of a straight channel, which branches into two perpendicular channels at a branching point downstream (T-branch). The entering particles are surrounded by a sheath of compatible liquid, keeping the particles confined to the center of the channel. In normal conditions, the flow ratio through the two branches is adjusted so that the particles automatically flow through one of the branches. In a section of the channel a characteristic of the particles is determined using a detector, which can be an optical system (detection phase). The detector raises a signal, which is interpreted. When the detector detects a particle possessing a predetermined characteristic in the decision phase, a deflector is activated for deflecting the particle in a deflection phase. In this case, the deflector comprises an electrode pair, positioned in the branch of the channel where the particles normally flow through in the inactivated state of the deflector. By the application of current pulses, the aqueous liquid is electrolysed, yielding a gas bubble evolving between the electrode pair. As the gas bubble increases in size, the flow rate through this branch is reduced during the evolving phase. After the current pulse is applied, the bubble growth stops and the gas bubble is carried along with the flow. As a result, the flow through the specific branch is momentarily reduced and the particle of interest changes paths and flows down the other branch.
The described device is effective for sorting particles, however one serious drawback is that gas bubbles are created which potentially can accumulate at certain points of the fluidic network or clog flow channels, yielding erroneous sorting. Another drawback is that the generated gasses (mostly oxygen and hydrogen) and ionic species (mostly OH− and H+) influence the particles flowing through the branch with the electrode pair. In addition, cells and delicate proteins such as enzymes are very fragile and can be destroyed by the fouling constituents co-generated with the gas bubble. Another drawback is the complexity of the overall sorting apparatus. In particular, the micro electrode construction is very complex to mount and assemble in the small channels of the system. As a result, the cost of a sorting unit is relatively large.
Another example of a particle sorting system of the prior art is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,984,307, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference. In the '307 patent, the particles are flowing, confined by a flowing sheath liquid, through the center of a channel. After passing a detector section, the channel branches to two channels under an acute angle (Y-branch). Just before the branching point, an electrically activated transducer is located in the channel for deflecting a specific particle having an appropriate, predetermined characteristic. The transducer described is a piezo actuator or ultrasonic transducer, yielding upon electrical activation a pressure wave in the channel. The generated pressure wave momentarily disturbs the flow in one branch thus deflecting the particle of interest into the other branch
Also in this device, as in the previous discussed device, the deflector is incorporated within the channel system, resulting in relatively large costs of construction. Another drawback is the deflector principle used. The generated pressure waves are not confined to the branching point, but will propagate upstream into the detector section as well as downstream both branches and influence the overall flow through the channel. This is particularly a drawback if sorters of this type are connected either in series or in parallel as to build a sorter system with increased throughput. Pressure waves generated in one sorter can then influence the flows and deflection of particles in neighboring sorter units.
Another disclosed sorter, U.S. Pat. No. 4,756,427, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference, is analogous to the sorter disclosed the earlier discussed '662. In this case however, the flow in one branch is disturbed by momentarily changing the resistance of the branch. The resistance is changed by changing the height of the branch channel by an external actuator. In the preferred embodiment, this external actuator is a piezo disc glued on top of the channel, causing it to move downwards upon activation.
Although the construction of the sorter described in the '427 patent is less complex as the previous sorter structures, it is still problematic to couple multiple sorter modules of the described type together to increase the sorting rate. This is, as in the sorter described in '307 because of the generated pressure waves causing interference with other sorter modules.
Another particle sorting device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,200, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference. The '200 patent describes a sorting device that uses a magnetic deflection module to classify or select particles based on their magnetic properties. The '200 patent further describes processing and separating individual particle streams in parallel.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for sorting particles moving through a closed channel system of capillary size. The particle sorting system of the invention provides a sorting module that can be assembled at low cost while providing an accurate means of sorting large amounts of particles per unit of time. The particle sorting system may include a plurality of closely coupled sorting modules which are combined to further increase the sorting rate. The particle sorting system may comprise a multi-stage sorting device for serially sorting streams of particles, in order to decrease the error rate.
The particle sorting system implements an improved fluidic particle switching method and switching device according to the current invention. The particle sorting system comprises a closed channel system of capillary size for sorting particles. The channel system comprises a first supply duct for introducing a stream of particles and a second supply duct for supplying a carrier liquid. The first supply duct forms a nozzle to introduce a stream of particles into the flow of carrier liquid. The first supply duct and the second supply duct enter a measurement duct, which branches into a first branch and a second branch at a branch point. A measurement region is defined in the measurement duct and is associated with a detector to sense a predetermined characteristic of particles in the measurement region. Two opposed bubble valves are positioned in communication with the measurement duct and are spaced opposite each other. The bubble valves communicate with the measurement duct through a pair of opposed side passages. Liquid is allowed to partly fill these side passages to form a meniscus therein which interfaces the carrier liquid with the reservoir of the bubble valves. An external actuator is also provided for actuating one of the bubble valves. When the external actuator is activated, the pressure in the reservoir of the activated bubble valve increases, deflecting the meniscus and causing a flow disturbance in the measurement duct to deflect the flow therein.
When a sensing means in the measuring region senses a predetermined characteristic in a particle flowing through the measurement region, the sensing means produces a signal in response to the sensed characteristic. The external actuator is responsive to the sensing means to cause a pressure pulse in a compression chamber of a first bubble valve to deflect the particle with the predetermined characteristic, causing the selected particle to flow down the second branch duct.
In one aspect, the invention comprises a method of sorting particles including the steps of providing a measurement duct having an inlet and a branching point at which the duct separates into two branch ducts, conducting a stream of fluid into the duct inlet with a stream of particles suspended therein, such that the particles normally flow through a first one of the branch ducts and providing upstream from the branching point two opposing side passages for momentarily deflecting the stream in the duct. A first one of the side passages is hydraulically connected to a compression chamber of a first bubble valve, which is acted upon by an external actuator for varying the pressure therein. A second of the side passages is hydraulically connected with a buffer chamber of a second bubble valve for absorbing pressure variations. The method further comprises providing a measurement station along the measurement duct upstream of the side passages for sensing a predetermined characteristic of particles in the stream and for producing a signal when the predetermined characteristic is sensed. The method further comprises the step of, in response to sensing the predetermined characteristic, activating the external actuator for creating a flow disturbance in the duct between the side passages, thereby deflecting the particle having the predetermined characteristics and causing the selected particle to flow down the second branch duct.
In further aspects of the invention, the particle sort rate is respectively increased or the type of particles sorted being increased, by respectively connecting a plurality of sorting modules in parallel or serially connecting a plurality of sorting modules in a binary tree like configuration.
According to one aspect of the invention, a particle sorting system is provided. The particles sorting system comprises a first duct for conveying a stream of suspended particles confined in a carrier liquid, comprising an inlet, a first outlet and a second outlet, a sensor for sensing a predetermined characteristic in a particle, a side channel in communication with the first duct, a sealed chamber positioned adjacent to the side channel, wherein the carrier fluid forms a meniscus in the side channel to separate the sealed chamber from the carrier fluid; and an actuator. The actuator modifies the pressure in the sealed chamber to deflect the meniscus when the sensor senses the predetermined characteristic. The deflection of the meniscus causes the particle having the predetermined characteristic to flow into the second outlet while particles that do not have the predetermined characteristic flow into the first outlet.
According to another aspect of the invention, a particle sorting system is provided. The particle sorting system comprises a first duct for conveying a stream of suspended particles confined in a carrier liquid, a sensor for sensing a predetermined characteristic in a particle and a first side channel in communication with the first duct. The first duct comprises an inlet, a first outlet and a second outlet. The particle sorting system further comprises a sealed actuator chamber positioned adjacent to the first side channel, wherein the carrier fluid forms a meniscus in the first side channel to separate the sealed chamber from the carrier fluid, an actuator for modifying the pressure in the sealed actuator chamber to deflect the meniscus when the sensor senses said predetermined characteristic and a buffer. The deflection of the meniscus creates a transient flow in the first duct which deflects particle having said predetermined characteristic to flow into the second outlet while particles that do not have said predetermined characteristic flow into the first outlet. The buffer absorbs a transient flow in the first duct.
According to another aspect of the invention, a particle sorting system is provided. The particle sorting system comprises a duct for conveying a stream of particles in a carrier fluid, a sensor for sensing a predetermined characteristic in a particle and an actuator. The duct comprises an inlet, a first outlet and a second outlet, wherein the particles normally flow from the inlet into the first outlet. The actuator selectively applies a pressure pulse to the suspension to deflect a particle in the stream of particles into the second outlet when said predetermined characteristic is detected. The particle sorting system further comprises a buffer for absorbing the pressure pulse.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a particle sorting system is provided. The particle sorting system comprises a duct for conveying a stream of suspended particles confined in a carrier fluid, comprising an inlet, a first outlet and a second outlet, wherein the particles normally flow from the inlet into the first outlet, a sensor for sensing a predetermined characteristic in a particle, an actuator for selectively applying a pressure pulse to the stream of suspended particles to deflect a particle in the stream of particles when said predetermined characteristic is detected, causing it to flow into the second outlet and a buffer for absorbing the pressure pulse. The buffer comprises a side channel in communication with the duct, a sealed buffer chamber adjacent to the side channel and a meniscus formed by the carrier fluid at an interface between the sealed chamber and the side channel.
According to still another aspect of the invention, a particle sorting system is provided. The particle sorting system comprises a first duct for conveying a stream of suspended particles confined in a carrier liquid, comprising an inlet, a first outlet and a second outlet, a sensor for sensing a predetermined characteristic in a particle, a side channel in communication with the first duct, a sealed chamber positioned adjacent to the side channel, wherein the carrier fluid forms a first meniscus in the side channel to separate the sealed chamber from the sealed chamber an actuator for modifying the pressure in the sealed chamber to deflect the first meniscus when the sensor senses said predetermined characteristic, whereby the deflection of the meniscus causes a particle having said predetermined characteristic to flow into the second outlet while particles that do not have said predetermined characteristic flow into the first outlet and a buffer for absorbing the pressure pulse. The buffer comprises a side channel in communication with the duct, a sealed chamber adjacent to the side channel and a first meniscus formed by the carrier fluid at an interface between the sealed chamber and the side channel.
According to another aspect of the invention, a particle sorting system for sorting particles suspended in a liquid is provided. The particle sorting system comprises an inlet duct through which flows a liquid containing particles having a predetermined characteristic and particles not having a predetermined characteristic. The inlet duct branches into a plurality of measurement channels which are operated in parallel and simultaneously fed with the liquid, each measurement channel having a sorting module and two outlet channels, and each sorting module having a switch unit for distribution of particles having a predetermined characteristic and particles not having a predetermined characteristic to said two different outlet channel. Each switch unit comprises at least one sensor which detects and classifies the particles having the predetermined characteristic, a side passage in communication with the inlet duct, a sealed chamber adjacent to and separated from the side passage by a meniscus formed by the liquid and an actuator controlled by each said sensor arranged on each said switch unit for selectively deflecting the meniscus to deflect a particle having the predetermined characteristic into one of said outlet channel. Each of the two outlet channels on each measurement channel is connected to a separate summing channel for the particles having a predetermined characteristic and particles not having a predetermined characteristic selectively distributed to it.
According to still another aspect of the invention, a particle sorting system for sorting particles suspended in a liquid is provided comprising an inlet duct through which flows a liquid containing particles having a predetermined characteristic and particles not having a predetermined characteristic. The inlet duct branches into a plurality of channels which are operated in parallel and simultaneously fed with the liquid, each channel having a sorting module and two outlet channels, and each sorting module having a switch unit for distribution of particles having a first predetermined characteristic and particles not having the first predetermined characteristic between said two different outlet channels. Each sorting module comprises at least one sensor which detects and classifies the particles having the first predetermined characteristic, and an actuator controlled by each of said sensor arranged on each said switch unit for selectively deflecting a particle having the first predetermined characteristic into one of said outlet channels. Each of said two outlet channels on each sorting module is connected to a separate summing channel for the particles having the first predetermined characteristic and particles not having the first predetermined characteristic selectively distributed to it. The system further comprises at least one secondary sorting module connected to the summing channel for the particles having the first predetermined characteristic, each of said secondary sorting modules having a first outlet channel and a second outlet channel, a detector for sensing particles and a switch unit for selectively deflecting a particle having a second predetermined characteristic into one of said outlet channels based on a second predetermined characteristic.
According to another aspect, a particle sorting system is provided, comprising a plurality of parallel primary sorting channels through which flows a stream of suspended particles confined in a carrier liquid. Each primary sorting channel has a detection region for detecting a predetermined characteristic in a particle and a switching region for separating particles having the predetermined characteristic into a first receiving channel from particles that do not have the predetermined characteristic, which flow into a second receiving channel. The system further comprises an aggregation region for aggregating the particles having the predetermined characteristic from the first receiving channels, and at least one secondary sorting channel in series with the plurality of parallel primary sorting channels for collecting the selected particles from the plurality of first outlet channels and separating particles in the secondary sorting channel having the predetermined characteristic from other particles in the secondary sorting channel.
According to a final aspect, a method of sorting small particles is provided. The method comprises the steps of providing a closed duct having an inlet and a fork at which the duct separates into two branch ducts, conducting a stream of liquid into the duct inlet with a stream of particles suspended therein, the particle stream normally flowing through a first one of the branch ducts surrounding the stream of liquid with a particle free enveloping current of liquid to produce substantially laminar flow and providing a measurement station along the closed duct upstream of the fork for sensing a predetermined property of particles in the stream and for producing a signal when the property is sensed. The method further comprises providing an actuator for applying a pressure on the liquid and providing means for buffering pressure variations in the liquid. The pressure buffering means cooperates with the pressure applying means to result in a momentary deflection of the liquid streaming through the duct substantially perpendicular to the normal direction of flow from the point where the pressure is applied towards the point where the pressure is buffered, causing the specific particle having the predetermined property to flow into the second branch duct without eliminating the laminar flow.
The present invention provides a particle sorting system for sorting particles suspended in a liquid. The particle sorting system provides high-throughput, low error sorting of particles based on a predetermined characteristic. The present invention will be described below relative to illustrative embodiments. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be implemented in a number of different applications and embodiments and is not specifically limited in its application to the particular embodiments depicted herein.
The first side passage 24a is hydraulically connected to a compression chamber 70a in the first bubble valve 100a, so that if the pressure in this chamber is increased, the flow in the measurement duct near the side passage is displaced inwards, substantially perpendicular to the normal flow in the duct. The second side passage 24b, positioned opposite of the first side passage 24a is hydraulically connected to a buffer chamber 70b in the second bubble valve 100b for absorbing pressure transients. This second side passage 24b co-operates with the first side passage 24a to direct the before mentioned liquid displacement caused by pressurizing the compression chamber 70a, so that the displacement has a component perpendicular to the normal flow of the particles through the measurement duct.
Upon pressurizing the compression chamber 70a an amount of liquid is transiently discharged from the first side passage 24a. The resiliency of the second side passage 24b results upon a pressurized discharge, in a transient flow of the liquid in the duct into the second side passage 24a. The co-operation of the two side passages and the fluidic structures they interconnect causes the flow through the measurement duct 16 to be transiently moved sideways back and forth upon pressurizing and depressurising of the compression chamber 70a induced by the external actuator 26 in response to the signal raised by the detection means 19. This transient liquid displacement, having a component perpendicular to the normal flow in the duct, can be applied in deflecting particles having predetermined characteristics to separate them from the remaining particles in the mixture.
As shown, the measurement duct 16 branches at the branch point 21 into two branches 22a, 22b and the flow rates in these branches are adjusted so that the particles normally stream through the second of the two branches 22b. The angle between the branches 22a, 22b is between 0 and 180 degrees, preferably between 10 and 45 degrees. However, the angle can even be 0 degrees, which corresponds to two parallel ducts with a straight separation wall between them.
The particles to be sorted are preferably supplied to a measurement position in a central fluid current, which is surrounded by a particle free liquid sheath. The process of confining a particle stream is known, and often referred to as a ‘sheath flow’ configuration. Normally confinement is achieved by injecting a stream of suspended particles through a narrow outlet nozzle into a particle free carrier liquid flowing in the duct 16. By adjusting the ratio of flow rates of the suspension and carrier liquid, the radial confinement in the duct as well as the inter particle distance can be adjusted. A relative large flow rate of the carrier liquid results in a more confined particle stream having a large distance between particles.
In a suspension introduced by the first supply duct 12, two types of particles can be distinguished, normal particles 18a and particles of interest 18b. Upon sensing the predetermined characteristic in a particle 18b in the measurement region 20, the detector 19 raises a signal. The external actuator 26 activates the first actuator bubble valve 100a, when signaled by the detector 19 in response to sensing the predetermined characteristic, to create a flow disturbance in the measurement duct 16 between the side passages 24a, 24b. The flow disturbance deflects the particle 18b having the predetermined characteristic so that it flows down the first branch duct 22a rather than the second branch duct 22b. The detector communicates with the actuator 26, so that when the detector 19 senses a predetermined characteristic in a particle, the actuator activates the first bubble valve 100a to cause pressure variations in the reservoir 70a of the first bubble valve. The activation of the first bubble valves deflects the meniscus 25a in the first bubble valve 100a and causes a transient pressure variation in the first side passage 24a. The second side passage 24b and the second bubble valve 100b absorb the transient pressure variations in the measurement duct 16 induced via the actuator 26. Basically, the reservoir 70b of the second bubble valve 100b is a buffer chamber having a resilient wall or containing a compressible fluid, such as a gas. The resilient properties allow the flow of liquid from the measurement duct into the second side passage 24b, allowing the pressure pulse to be absorbed and preventing disturbance to the flow of the non-selected particles in the stream of particles.
At the measurement region 20, individual particles are inspected, using a suitable sensor means 19, for a particular characteristic, such as size, form, fluorescent intensity etc. Examples of applicable sensing means, known in the art, are various types of optical detection systems such as microscopes, machine vision systems and electronic means for measuring electronic properties of the particles. Particularly well known systems in the field are systems for measuring the fluorescent intensity of particles. These systems comprise a light source having a suitable wavelength for inducing fluorescence and a detection system for measuring the intensity of the induced fluorescent light. This approach is often used in combination with particles that are labelled with a fluorescent marker, i.e. an attached molecule that upon illuminating with light of a particular first wavelength produces light at another particular second wavelength (fluorescence). If this second wavelength light is detected, the characteristic is sensed and a signal is raised.
Other examples include the measurement of light scattered by particles flowing through the measurement region. Interpreting the scattering yield information on the size and form of particles, which can be adopted to raise a signal when a predetermined characteristic is detected.
The actuator 26 for pressurizing the compression chamber of the first bubble valve may comprise an external actuator that responds to a signal from the sensor that a particle has a selected predetermined characteristic. There are two classes of external actuators that are suitable for increasing the pressure. The first class directly provides a gas pressure to the liquid in the first side passage 24a. For example, the actuator may comprise a source of pressurized gas connected with a switching valve to the liquid column in the side passage 24a. Activation of the switch connects the passage to the source of pressurized gas, which deflects the meniscus in the liquid. Upon deactivation, the switch connects the passage 24a back to the normal operating pressure.
Alternatively, a displacement actuator may be used in combination with a closed compression chamber having a movable wall. When the displacement actuator displaces the wall of the compression chamber inward, the pressure inside increases. If the movable wall is displaced back to the original position, the pressure is reduced back to the normal operating pressure. An example of a suitable displacement actuator is an electromagnetic actuator, which causes displacement of a plunger upon energizing a coil. Another example is the use of piezoelectric material, for example in the form of a cylinder or a stack of disks, which upon the application of a voltage produces a linear displacement. Both types of actuators engage the movable wall of the compression chamber 70 to cause pressure variations therein.
This process of detecting and selective deflecting of particles may be repeated many times per second for sorting particles at a high rate. Adopting the fluid switching as described, switching operations may be executed up to around several thousand switching operations per second, yielding sorting rates in the order of million sorted particles per hour.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the actuator bubble valve 100a and the buffer bubble valve 100b may be placed in different positions. For example, as shown in
According to another embodiment, shown in
Given that each single channel sorting process produces some error (y) rate (y is a probability less than one of a particle being “selected” by mistake) of mistaken selections, the hierarchical architecture produces an lower error rate of y2 for a 2-stage hierarchy as drawn or yn for an n-stage hierarchy. For example, if the single channel error rate is 1% the 2-stage error rate is 0.01% or one part in 104.
Alternatively, the architecture could have M primary sets of N sorting channels per secondary channel. Given that the application wants to capture particles that have a presence in the input at rate z and single channel sorters have a maximum sorting rate x particles per second. The system throughput is M*N*x in particles per second. The number of particles aggregated in N channels per second is N*x*z and so N*z must be less than 1 so that all particles aggregated from N channels can be sorted by a single secondary channel. To increase throughput above N=1/z one must add parallel groups of N primary+1 secondary channels. Overall throughput then comes from M*N*x with M secondary channels.
The present invention has been described relative to an illustrative embodiment. Since certain changes may be made in the above constructions without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are to cover all generic and specific features of the invention described herein, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/158,960, filed Jun. 13, 2011 and entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SORTING PARTICLES,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/537,802, filed Aug. 7, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/499,953, filed Aug. 7, 2006, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/940,143 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Sorting Particles” filed Sep. 13, 2004, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/179,488 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Sorting Particles” filed Jun. 24, 2002 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/373,256 entitled “Microfluidic System Including a Bubble Valve for Regulating Fluid Flow Through a Microchannel” filed Apr. 17, 2002, the contents of each application is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2015522 | Hoffman | Sep 1935 | A |
2646882 | Frost | Jul 1953 | A |
2787453 | Hibshman et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
2850940 | Opperman | Sep 1958 | A |
2923410 | Florian | Feb 1960 | A |
3289687 | Dunaway | Dec 1966 | A |
3362421 | Schaffer | Jan 1968 | A |
3370538 | Hines et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3495253 | Richards | Feb 1970 | A |
3506654 | Fried | Apr 1970 | A |
3508654 | Glaettli | Apr 1970 | A |
3508655 | Kamentsky | Apr 1970 | A |
3560754 | Kamentsky | Feb 1971 | A |
3785390 | Taylor | Jan 1974 | A |
3791517 | Friedman | Feb 1974 | A |
3827555 | Kamentsky et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3906415 | Baker | Sep 1975 | A |
3984307 | Kamentsky et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3984621 | Propst | Oct 1976 | A |
4050851 | Haavik | Sep 1977 | A |
4147621 | Giddings | Apr 1979 | A |
4153855 | Feingold | May 1979 | A |
4175662 | Zold | Nov 1979 | A |
4284499 | Moudgil et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4318483 | Lombardo et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4344844 | Townley | Aug 1982 | A |
4361400 | Gray et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4365719 | Kelly | Dec 1982 | A |
4426451 | Columbus | Jan 1984 | A |
4445696 | Raj et al. | May 1984 | A |
4526276 | Shoor et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4554427 | Flick et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4572664 | Hanson | Feb 1986 | A |
4579173 | Rosensweig et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4581624 | O'Connor | Apr 1986 | A |
4636149 | Brown | Jan 1987 | A |
4676274 | Brown | Jun 1987 | A |
4756427 | Gohde et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4808079 | Crowley et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4863588 | Herron | Sep 1989 | A |
4908112 | Pace | Mar 1990 | A |
4936465 | Zold | Jun 1990 | A |
4939081 | Figdor et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4963498 | Hillman et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5005639 | Leland | Apr 1991 | A |
5030002 | North, Jr. | Jul 1991 | A |
5065978 | Albarda et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5092972 | Ghowsi | Mar 1992 | A |
5101978 | Marcus | Apr 1992 | A |
5193688 | Giddings | Mar 1993 | A |
5265327 | Faris et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271724 | van Lintel | Dec 1993 | A |
5275787 | Yuguchi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5277556 | van Lintel | Jan 1994 | A |
5395588 | North, Jr. et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5486335 | Wilding et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498392 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5617955 | Tanner | Apr 1997 | A |
5632935 | Yeoman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637496 | Thaler et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5699157 | Parce | Dec 1997 | A |
5726026 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726404 | Brody | Mar 1998 | A |
5777649 | Otsuka et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5783446 | Saul et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789045 | Wapner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795727 | Bierre et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5837200 | Diessel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858195 | Ramsey | Jan 1999 | A |
5876187 | Forster et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885470 | Parce et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5976336 | Dubrow et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979664 | Brodeur | Nov 1999 | A |
5988522 | Glezer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998212 | Corio et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6033191 | Kamper et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046056 | Parce et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048328 | Haller et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048734 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057111 | Deiss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062681 | Field et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068752 | Dubrow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086740 | Kennedy | Jul 2000 | A |
6102530 | Kim et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120666 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6145247 | McKinnis | Nov 2000 | A |
6152181 | Wapner et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6196525 | Ganan-Calvo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203291 | Stemme et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214556 | Olek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221654 | Quake et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6273553 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280967 | Ransom et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6318970 | Backhouse | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337740 | Parce | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360775 | Barth et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6431212 | Hayenga et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432630 | Blankenstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454862 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455280 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6481453 | O'Connor et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482652 | Furlong et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507391 | Riley et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6524790 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532061 | Ortyn et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540895 | Spence et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561224 | Cho | May 2003 | B1 |
6592821 | Wada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597438 | Cabuz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6629820 | Kornelsen | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657730 | Pfau et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6739576 | O'Connor et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6799681 | Warren | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6802342 | Fernandes et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803194 | Keck et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6808075 | Bohm et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6821484 | Gregersen | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830936 | Anderson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6877528 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6976590 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7024281 | Unno | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7069943 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7075652 | Sarvazyan et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080664 | Ayer | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7104405 | Bohm et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118910 | Unger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7157274 | Bohm et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7157275 | Guarino et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7220594 | Foster et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7258774 | Chou et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7303727 | Dubrow et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7355699 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7389879 | Tyvoll et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7452725 | Leary et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7497334 | Tyvoll et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7569788 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584857 | Bohm et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7612355 | Wu et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7820427 | Unger et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7863035 | Clemens et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7963399 | Bohm et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7964078 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8123044 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8210209 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8252604 | Rigler | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8268245 | Wahl | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8408399 | Bohm et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8567608 | Deshpande et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8609039 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623294 | Asogawa et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8623295 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8678192 | Pung et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8691164 | Butler et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8723140 | Kiesel et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727131 | Desphande et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8844571 | Golling | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8895311 | Handique | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9011797 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9074978 | Lo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9149806 | Collins | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9194786 | Foster | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9339850 | Deshpande et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9448157 | Ito | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9550215 | Deshpande et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20020005354 | Spence et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020058332 | Quake et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020093641 | Ortyn et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020166585 | O'Connor et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030027225 | Wada et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040037739 | McNeely et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040180426 | Maher et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040233424 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060170912 | Mueth et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177348 | Yasuda et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060278288 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070065808 | Bohm et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080070311 | Li | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080213821 | Liu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090283452 | Lean et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100032350 | Deshpande et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100133151 | Bohm et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110005978 | Bohm et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030808 | Chiou et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120006727 | Bohm et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120012508 | Deshpande et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015442 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120153185 | Ito et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120258488 | Abilez et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130083315 | Lo et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140251879 | Deshpande et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140339445 | Sharpe et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150298122 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150352597 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375227 | Quake | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160040226 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160158758 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 177 718 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0 745 682 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1065378 | Jan 2001 | EP |
2229649 | Oct 1990 | GB |
S49-046274 | May 1974 | JP |
S61-137062 | Jun 1986 | JP |
S63-259466 | Oct 1988 | JP |
H01-170853 | Jul 1989 | JP |
H03-043070 | Feb 1991 | JP |
H05-506180 | Sep 1993 | JP |
H06-507241 | Aug 1994 | JP |
H08-332074 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H09-141124 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H11-508182 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001-521755 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-503334 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2004-505272 | Feb 2004 | JP |
9114505 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9115750 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9807069 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9810267 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9852691 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9923471 | May 1999 | WO |
0070080 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0210713 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0244689 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2003089158 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,482,869, dated Jul. 26, 2012. |
Communication issued in European Application No. 03 726 391.0-2204, dated Apr. 12, 2010. |
Supplementary European Search Report issued in European Application No. 03726391.0-2204, dated Oct. 6, 2009. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 03814212.0, dated Feb. 20, 2009. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 03814212.0, dated Apr. 25, 2008. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2004-536583, dated Sep. 29, 2009. |
Written Opinion issued in Singapore Application No. 200701943-3, dated Dec. 1, 2009. |
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/29198, dated Feb. 21, 2006. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/29198, dated Jun. 10, 2005. |
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/12368, dated Aug. 25, 2004. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/12368, dated Aug. 21, 2003. |
Supplementary European Search Report issued in European Application No. 03752432.9, dated Aug. 14, 2009. |
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/12359, dated Nov. 12, 2003. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/12359, dated Jun. 28, 2003. |
Examination Report issued in Australian Application No. 2003228630, dated Feb. 11, 2008. |
First Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 03825178.7, dated Jun. 27, 2008. |
Second Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 03825178.7, dated Mar. 20, 2009. |
Third Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 03825178.7, dated Sep. 18, 2009. |
Office Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2007-315437, dated May 11, 2011. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,482,869, dated Dec. 17, 2010. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,482,869, dated Feb. 16, 2010. |
Examination Report issued in Indian Application No. 1587/KOLNP/2004, dated Jul. 15, 2010. |
Office Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2007-315437, dated May 12, 2010. |
Examination Report issued in Australian Application No. 2010200179, dated Mar. 22, 2011. |
Office Action issued in Israeli Application No. 167266, dated Sep. 28, 2010. |
Office Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2003-585899, dated Jan. 11, 2008. |
Office Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2003-585899, dated Jun. 6, 2007. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,482,869, dated Sep. 13, 2011. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 200910168699.1, dated Jun. 21, 2012. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,790, dated Oct. 1, 2012. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,132, dated Nov. 6, 2012. |
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/12360, dated Jul. 21, 2004. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US03/12360, dated Oct. 30, 2003. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,790, dated Apr. 14, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,132, dated Jan. 2, 2014. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/329,008, dated May 23, 2005. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/329,008, dated Nov. 30, 2004. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/664,587, dated Feb. 9, 2006. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/664,587, dated Jun. 13, 2005. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/664,587, dated Nov. 30, 2004. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/101,038, dated Feb. 22, 2008. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/101,038, dated Jul. 9, 2007. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/101,038, dated Jun. 5, 2006. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,254, dated Jan. 11, 2012. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,254, dated Jul. 26, 2012. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/499,254, dated Mar. 9, 2010. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,790, dated Dec. 2, 2013. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,790, dated Jun. 6, 2012. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,790, dated Oct. 1, 2014. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,132, dated Jun. 10, 2013. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,132, dated Nov. 6, 2012. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,303, dated Apr. 18, 2016. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/603,444, dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/537,802 dated Jun. 18, 2010. |
Search Information Statement issued in Australian Application No. 2010200179, dated Mar. 22, 2011. |
Examination Report by Brazilian Patent Office for Brazilian Application No. PI0309321-2 dated Aug. 9, 2016 (English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130313170 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60373256 | Apr 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10179488 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10940143 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13158960 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13849365 | US | |
Parent | 12537802 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13158960 | US | |
Parent | 11499953 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 12537802 | US | |
Parent | 10940143 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11499953 | US |