1. Field
The present invention relates to medical devices and, more particularly, to methods and apparatuses for spinal stabilization.
2. Description of the Related Art
The human spine is a flexible weight bearing column formed from a plurality of bones called vertebrae. There are thirty three vertebrae, which can be grouped into one of five regions (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral, and coccygeal). Moving down the spine, there are generally seven cervical vertebra, twelve thoracic vertebra, five lumbar vertebra, five sacral vertebra, and four coccygeal vertebra. The vertebra of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spine are typically separate throughout the life of an individual. In contrast, the vertebra of the sacral and coccygeal regions in an adult are fused to form two bones, the five sacral vertebra which form the sacrum and the four coccygeal vertebra which form the coccyx.
In general, each vertebra contains an anterior, solid segment or body and a posterior segment or arch. The arch is generally formed of two pedicles and two laminae, supporting seven processes—four articular, two transverse, and one spinous. There are exceptions to these general characteristics of a vertebra. For example, the first cervical vertebra (atlas vertebra) has neither a body nor spinous process. In addition, the second cervical vertebra (axis vertebra) has an odontoid process, which is a strong, prominent process, shaped like a tooth, rising perpendicularly from the upper surface of the body of the axis vertebra. Further details regarding the construction of the spine may be found in such common references as Gray's Anatomy, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1977, pp. 33-54, which is herein incorporated by reference.
The human vertebrae and associated connective elements are subjected to a variety of diseases and conditions which cause pain and disability. Among these diseases and conditions are spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, vertebral instability, spinal stenosis and degenerated, herniated, or degenerated and herniated intervertebral discs. Additionally, the vertebrae and associated connective elements are subject to injuries, including fractures and torn ligaments and surgical manipulations, including laminectomies.
The pain and disability related to the diseases and conditions often result from the displacement of all or part of a vertebra from the remainder of the vertebral column. Over the past two decades, a variety of methods have been developed to restore the displaced vertebra to their normal position and to fix them within the vertebral column. Spinal fusion is one such method. In spinal fusion, one or more of the vertebra of the spine are united together (“fused”) so that motion no longer occurs between them. The vertebra may be united with various types of fixation systems. These fixation systems may include a variety of longitudinal elements such as rods or plates that span two or more vertebrae and are affixed to the vertebrae by various fixation elements such as wires, staples, and screws (often inserted through the pedicles of the vertebrae). These systems may be affixed to either the posterior or the anterior side of the spine. In other applications, one or more bone screws may be inserted through adjacent vertebrae to provide stabilization.
Although spinal fusion is a highly documented and proven form of treatment in many patients, there is currently a great interest in surgical techniques that provide stabilization of the spine while allowing for some degree of movement. In this manner, the natural motion of the spine can be preserved, especially for those patients with mild or moderate disc conditions. In certain types of these techniques, flexible materials are used as fixation rods to stabilize the spine while permitting a limited degree of movement.
Notwithstanding the variety of efforts in the prior art described above, these techniques are associated with a variety of disadvantages. In particular, these techniques typically involve an open surgical procedure, which results higher cost, lengthy in-patient hospital stays and the pain associated with open procedures.
Therefore, there remains a need for improved techniques and systems for stabilization the spine. Preferably, the devices are implantable through a minimally invasive procedure.
Accordingly, some embodiments a spinal stabilization device comprises an elongate body having a distal end and a proximal end. The distal end can be implanted in an inferior vertebrae and the proximal end can abut against a superior vertebrae to limit at least one degree of movement between the superior vertebrae and the inferior vertebrae. In some embodiments, the body can at least partially be made of an allograft, such as cortical bone. In some embodiments, the body can be at least partially made of a biocompatible material, such as Polyether-etherketone (PEEK™) and can be an interbody cage.
In some embodiments, the spinal stabilization can comprise a proximal anchor, carried by the elongate body, and having a diameter. In some embodiments, the spinal stabilization device can further comprising a distal anchor on the distal end of the elongate body.
Some embodiments of the present application comprise a method of limiting extension between an inferior and superior body structure of a spine. The steps of the method can include inserting a distal end of a biocompatible stabilization device into the inferior body structure of the spine and securing the stabilization device to the inferior body structure. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the stabilization device can be an abutment that limits extension between the superior body structure and the inferior body structure. In some embodiments, cortical bone can grow around the proximal end of the stabilization device to form the abutment.
Although the stabilization devices described herein will be disclosed primarily in the context of a spinal stabilization procedure, the methods and structures disclosed herein are intended for application in any of a variety medical applications, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.
With reference to the illustrated embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiment, motion of the spine is limited when the proximal end of the device contacts, abuts, and/or wedges against the inferior articular process of the superior adjacent vertebra 10b. In this application, it should be appreciated that one or more intermediate member(s) (e.g., plates, platforms, coatings, cement, and/or adhesives) can be coupled to the superior adjacent vertebra 10b or other portions of the spine that the device contacts, abuts, and/or wedges against. Thus, in this application, when reference is made to the device contacting, abutting and/or wedging against a portion of the spine it should be appreciated that this includes embodiments in which the device contacts, abuts and/or wedges against one or more intermediate members that are coupled to the spine unless otherwise noted.
As explained below, the bone stabilization devices 12 may be used after laminectomy, discectomy, artificial disc replacement, microdiscectomy, laminotomy and other applications for providing temporary or permanent stability in the spinal column. For example, lateral or central spinal stenosis may be treated with the bone fixation devices 12 and techniques described below. In such procedures, the bone fixation devices 12 and techniques may be used alone or in combination with laminectomy, discectomy, artificial disc replacement, and/or other applications for relieving pain and/or providing stability.
An embodiment of the stabilization device 12 will now be described in detail with initial reference to
In some embodiments, the body 28 can be made of allograft or other suitable biological material, such as for example cortical bone, cancellous bone, demineralized bone matrix (DBM) or bone morphogenic protein (BMP). The biological material can beneficially promote integration of the stabilization device 12 into surrounding tissue. However, as will be described in more detail below, other materials, or bioabsorbable or biocompatible materials can be utilized, depending upon the dimensions and desired structural integrity of the finished stabilization device 12.
In certain embodiments, the body 28, can be made entirely of allograft bone (e.g., cortical bone, cancellous bone and/or a combination of cortical and cancellous bone allograft). However, as note above other materials, or bioabsorbable or biocompatible materials can be utilized, depending upon the dimensions and desired features in other embodiments. For example, in one embodiment, the body 28 is substantially made entirely of allograft bone such that over 95% of the weight of the body 28 is from allograft bone, in another embodiment, over 90% of the weight of the body 28 is from allograft bone and in another embodiment over 75% of the weight of the body 28 is from allograft bone. In some embodiments, the body 28 can be formed of allograft bone and certain portions can be formed or coated with another biocompatible or bioabsorbable material, such as, a metal (e.g., titanium), ceramics, nylon, Teflon, polymers, etc. In other embodiments, a portion of the body 28 is formed from allograft bone while the remaining portions are made of another material metal (e.g., titanium), ceramics, nylon, Teflon, polymers. For example, portions of the body 28 that are intended to contact the spine can be formed of allograft bone with the remaining portions formed of another material (e.g., metal, ceramic, nylon, polymer etc.).
In certain embodiments, the body 28 can be press-fitted (i.e., have an interference fit) with the hole in the inferior vertebrae 10a. As such, the diameter of the body 28 is preferably the same as, or slightly larger than, the diameter of the hole formed in the vertebrae. In some embodiments, once the stabilization device 12 is inserted into the hole formed in the inferior vertebrae 10a, the stabilization device 12 can fuse with the inferior vertebrae 10a. The allograft or biocompatible material promotes bone growth around the stabilization device 12.
In other embodiments, the body 28 can be attached to the vertebrae through the use of an adhesive, such as biomedical cement. In some embodiments, a temporary adhesive can be used to initially secure the stabilization device 12 to the vertebrae until the components can fuse together.
In still other embodiments, the body can have a distal end that is configured to be secured to the hole in the inferior vertebrae 10a. As explained in further detail below, the distal end can have a bone anchor that secures the body to the inferior vertebrae. For example, the distal end can have threads to screw the body to the inferior vertebrae. In another example, the body can have groove features around the circumference of the body that help grab the bone after inserting the body into the hole after, for example the anchor is press-fitted into the hole. In some embodiments, other methods of securing the stabilization device to the vertebrae can be used, such as for example flanges, fasteners, staples, screws, and the like.
The proximal end 30 of the stabilization device 12 can extend beyond the surface of a inferior vertebrae 10a such that it can limit motion of an adjacent superior vertebrae 10b with respect to the inferior vertebrae 10a. In some embodiments, the proximal end 30 of the device can limit motion by abutting and/or wedging against a surface of the superior vertebrae 10b as the superior vertebrae 10b moves relative to the inferior vertebrae 10a. In some embodiments, a mass or growth can form around the proximal end 30 of the stabilization device 12, which can provide a support against which the superior vertebrae 10b can abut. The mass can advantageously grow around the superior vertebrae 10a and provide an abutment that is contoured to the shape of the superior vertebrae 10a. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the proximal end 30 of the stabilization device 12 can have a roughened surface to promote bone growth around the proximal end 30. In some embodiments, the proximal end 30 can have a structure or a cage to serve as a foundation for bone growth. In some embodiments, the proximal end 30 can have other features that are known to promote bone growth.
With continued reference to
As illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
In embodiments optimized for spinal stabilization in an adult human population, the anchor 50 can have a diameter within the range of from about 1 to 1/16 of an inch in some embodiments the proximal anchor proximal anchor 50 within the range from about 0.5 to ⅛ of an inch in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 of the fixation device can be coupled to, attached, or integrally formed with the body 28. For example, the proximal anchor 50 can be preassembled with the body 28 prior to implanting the device. The proximal anchor 50 can be attached to the body 28 through an interference fit, or press fit. In other embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 can be attached to the body 28 with the use of adhesives, fasteners, staples, screws, and the like. In another example, the proximal anchor 50 and the body 28 can be made from a single piece. Thus, the clinician can select a single-piece fixation device of the proper length, or preassemble a body 28 and proximal anchor 50 of desired dimensions, and advance the device into the vertebrae until the proximal anchor lies flush with the vertebrae or is otherwise positioned accordingly with respect to the vertebrae.
In some embodiments, the body 28 and proximal anchor 50 can be implanted as separate components, wherein the proximal anchor 50 is attached to the body 28 in situ. The clinician can have several stabilization devices 12 with an array of bodies 28 and proximal anchors 50, having, for example, different configurations and/or shapes. The clinician can choose the appropriate body 28 and secure the body to the inferior vertebrae 10a according to any method known in the art, such as the methods discussed above. Then, the clinician can assess the position of the body 28 with respect to the superior vertebrae and chose the proximal anchor 50 from the array, which best fits the patient anatomy to achieve the desired clinical result. The proximal anchor 50 can be advanced onto body 28 until the proximal anchor 50 lies flush with the vertebrae or is otherwise positioned accordingly with respect to the vertebrae. In some embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 can advantageously be coupled to body 28 after the body 28 is partially or fully inserted into the vertebrae. The proximal anchor 50 can be secured to the body 28 through an interference fit, adhesives, fasteners, staples, screws, and the like.
In some embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 can be made entirely of allograft bone (e.g., cortical bone, cancellous bone, demineralized bone matrix (DBM) or bone morphogenic protein (BMP and/or a combination or subcombinatnion of such elements). However, as note above other materials, or bioabsorbable or biocompatible materials can be utilized, depending upon the dimensions and desired features in other embodiments. For example, in one embodiment, the proximal anchor 50 is substantially made entirely of allograft bone such that over 95% of the weight of the proximal anchor 50 is from allograft bone, in another embodiment, over 90% of the weight of the proximal anchor 50 is from allograft bone and in another embodiment over 75% of the weight of the proximal anchor 50 is from allograft bone. In some embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 can be formed of allograft bone and certain portions can be formed or coated with another biocompatible or bioabsorbable material, such as, a metal (e.g., titanium), ceramics, nylon, Teflon, polymers, etc. In other embodiments, a portion of the proximal anchor 50 is formed from allograft bone while the remaining portions are made of another material metal (e.g., titanium), ceramics, nylon, Teflon, polymers. For example, portions of the proximal anchor 50 that are intended to contact the spine can be formed of allograft bone with the remaining portions formed of another material (e.g., metal, ceramic, nylon, polymer etc.).
In some embodiments, the proximal anchor that is coupled to, attached or integrally formed with the body 28 can be configured to have an outer surface which can rotate, preferably freely, with respect to the body 28. This arrangement advantageously reduces the tendency of the body 28 to rotate and/or move within the inferior vertebrae as the proximal anchor 50 contacts the superior vertebrae.
With reference to
As discussed above, in some embodiments, the body 28 has a dowel-like shape and can be press-fitted into a hole in the inferior vertebrae 10a. However, in other embodiments, the distal end 32 of the body 28 can be provided with a cancellous bone anchor and/or distal cortical bone anchor in the form of a thread. Generally, for spinal stabilization, the distal anchor 34 can be adapted to be rotationally inserted into a portion (e.g., the pars or pedicle) of a first vertebra. In the embodiment illustrated in
In some embodiments, the helical flange 72 can have a generally triangular cross-sectional shape. However, it should be appreciated that the helical flange 72 can have any of a variety of cross sectional shapes, such as rectangular, oval or other as deemed desirable for a particular application through routine experimentation in view of the disclosure herein. For example, in one modified embodiment, the flange 72 can have a triangular cross-sectional shape with a blunted or square apex. One particularly advantageous cross-sectional shape of the flange are the blunted or square type shapes. Such shapes can reduce cutting into the bone as the proximal end of the device is activated, reducing a “window-wiper effect” that is caused by cyclic loading and can loosen the device 12. The outer edge of the helical flange 72 can define an outer boundary. The ratio of the diameter of the outer boundary to the diameter of the central core 73 can be optimized with respect to the desired retention force within the cancellous bone and giving due consideration to the structural integrity and strength of the distal anchor 34. Another aspect of the distal anchor 34 that can be optimized is the shape of the outer boundary and the central core 73, which in the illustrated embodiment are generally cylindrical.
The distal end 32 and/or the outer edges of the helical flange 72 may be atraumatic (e.g., blunt or soft). This inhibits the tendency of the stabilization device 12 to migrate anatomically distally and potentially out of the vertebrae after implantation. Distal migration can also be inhibited by the dimensions and presence of the proximal anchor 50. In the spinal column, distal migration can be particularly disadvantageous because the distal anchor 34 may harm the tissue, nerves, blood vessels and/or spinal cord which lie within and/or surround the spine. Such features also reduce the tendency of the distal anchor to cut into the bone during the “window-wiper effect.” In other embodiments, the distal end 32 and/or the outer edges of the helical flange 72 can be sharp and/or configured such that the distal anchor 34 is self tapping and/or self drilling.
The fixation devices 12 can be made of allograft or other suitable biological material, such as for example cortical bone. The biological material can beneficially promote integration of the stabilization device into surrounding tissue.
In one embodiment, the distal end of the fixation device 12 that is configured to be positioned within the inferior vertebral body is intended to integrate with the implantation site. In contrast, the proximal or stabilizer portion of the device which abuts against the superior vertebral body can be treated with an extra process such that this portion of the device resists bone in growth and integration. For example, the proximal or stabilizer portion that abuts against the superior vertebra body can be sterilized (e.g., with gamma radiation, ebeam or Ethylene Oxide (ETO)) and/or treated through a chemical process that causes such portions to resist bone in growth and integration. In a similar manner, the distal end of the fixation device can also be treated to enhance bone in growth and integration.
In the illustrated embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiment embodiments, the body 28 and proximal anchor 50′ can be made from allograft. As discussed above, the allograft material advantageously promotes integration with the native bone structure. In some embodiments, it can be beneficial for the proximal anchor 50′ not to integrate with the native bone structures, such as when the proximal anchor 50′ needs to be removed later, or when bone growth around the proximal anchor 50′ undesirably changes critical dimensions of the proximal anchor. In such embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 can be treated with a process to resist bone in-growth and integration.
In some embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 can be configured such that it can be removed after being coupled and advance over the body 28. In this manner, if the clinician determines after advancing the proximal anchor that the proximal anchor 50 is not of the right or most appropriate configuration (e.g., size and/or shape), the clinician can remove the proximal anchor 50 and advance a different proximal anchor 50 over the body 28. In such an embodiment, the proximal anchor 50 is preferably provided with one or more engagement structures (e.g., slots, hexes, recesses, protrusions, etc.) configured to engage a rotational and/or gripping device (e.g., slots, hexes, recesses, protrusions, etc.). Thus, in some embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 can be pulled and/or rotated such that the anchor 50 is removed from the body 28.
In one embodiment of the device of
As noted above, on one embodiment, the proximal anchor 50, 50′ described above (and/or the proximal end of the device of
With continued reference to
As illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment embodiments, the body 128 and proximal anchor 150 can be made from allograft or substantially of allograft as described above. As discussed above, the allograft material advantageously promotes integration with the native bone structure. In some embodiments, it can be beneficial for the proximal anchor 150 not to integrate with the native bone structures, such as when the proximal anchor 150 needs to be removed later, or when bone growth around the proximal anchor 150 undesirably changes critical dimensions of the proximal anchor. In such embodiments, the proximal anchor sections 160 can be treated with a process to resist bone in-growth and integration.
In one embodiment of the device of
In the embodiment illustrated in
In some embodiments, the hole 262 can extend at an angle to the transverse plane that is normal to the longitudinal axis of the proximal anchor 250. The dowel 264 can have an interference fit in the holes 262 or can be secured through a variety of manners, such as, adhesives, cements, fasteners, threaded surfaces, interlocking surface structures and the like. For example, instead of a dowel, a fastener can be screwed into the proximal anchor 250 and into the body 228. In one arrangement, the pin or dowel 264 is also made of allograft. In a modified arrangement, the pin or dowel can be made of another material (e.g., a metal or plastic).
With reference to
In the illustrated embodiment embodiments, the body 228 and proximal anchor 250 can be made from allograft or substantially of allograft as describe above. As discussed above, the allograft material advantageously promotes integration with the native bone structure. In some embodiments, it can be beneficial for the proximal anchor 250 not to integrate with the native bone structures, such as when the proximal anchor 250 needs to be removed later, or when bone growth around the proximal anchor 250 undesirably changes critical dimensions of the proximal anchor. In such embodiments, the proximal anchor 250 can be treated with a process to resist bone in-growth and integration.
The embodiments described above in which the device comprises multiple pieces can be assembled and semi-permanently or permanently attached prior to implantation. In other embodiments, one or more of the assembly steps can occur at the surgical site. In other embodiments, the pieces can be pre-assembled and then permanently or semi-permanently attached at the surgical site.
Methods of implanting stabilization devices described above as part of a spinal stabilization procedure will now be described. Although certain aspects and features of the methods and instruments described herein can be utilized in an open surgical procedure, the disclosed methods and instruments are optimized in the context of a percutaneous or minimally invasive approach in which the procedure is done through one or more percutaneous small openings. Thus, the method steps which follow and those disclosed are intended for use in a trans-tissue approach. However, to simplify the illustrations, the soft tissue adjacent the treatment site have not been illustrated in the drawings.
In some embodiments of use, a patient with a spinal instability is identified. The patient is preferably positioned face down on an operating table, placing the spinal column into a normal or flexed position. A trocar optionally can then be inserted through a tissue tract and advanced towards a first vertebrae. In some embodiments, biopsy needle (e.g., Jamshidi™) device can be used. A guidewire can then be advanced through the trocar (or directly through the tissue, for example, in an open surgical procedure) and into the first vertebrae. The guide wire is preferably inserted into the pedicle of the vertebrae preferably through the pars (i.e. the region of the lamina between the superior and inferior articular processes). A suitable expandable access sheath or dilator can then be inserted over the guidewire and expanded to enlarge the tissue tract and provide an access lumen for performing the methods described below in a minimally invasive manner. In a modified embodiment, a suitable tissue expander (e.g., a balloon expanded catheter or a series of radially enlarged sheaths) can be inserted over the guidewire and expanded to enlarge the tissue tract. A surgical sheath can then be advanced over the expanded tissue expander. The tissue expander can then be removed such that the surgical sheath provides an enlarged access lumen. Any of a variety of expandable access sheaths or tissue expanders can be used, such as, for example, a balloon expanded catheter, a series of radially enlarged sheaths inserted over each other, and/or the dilation introducer described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/038,784, filed Jan. 19, 2005 (Publication No. 2005/0256525), the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
A drill with a rotatable tip may be advanced over the guidewire and through the sheath. The drill may be used to drill an opening in the vertebrae. The opening may be configured for (i) for insertion of the body 28 of the bone stabilization device 12, (ii) tapping and/or (iii) providing a counter sink for the proximal anchor 50. In other embodiments, the step of drilling may be omitted. In such embodiments, the distal anchor 34 is preferably self-tapping and self drilling. In embodiments in which an opening is formed, a wire or other instrument can be inserted into the opening and used to measure the desired length of the body 28 of the device 12.
As will be explained below, the superior body structure (e.g., the superior vertebrae 10b) can be conformed to the device by providing a complementary surface or interface. In some embodiments, the superior vertebrae can be modified using a separate drill or reamer that is also used to from the countersink described above. In other embodiments, the drill that is used to form an opening in the inferior superior body can be provided with a countersink portion that is also used to modify the shape of the superior vertebrae 10b. In still other embodiments, the shape of the superior vertebrae 10b can be modified using files, burrs and other bone cutting or resurfacing devices to from a complementary surface or interface for the proximal anchor 50.
As mentioned above, a countersink can be provided for the proximal anchor 50. With reference to
The countersink 300 advantageously disperses the forces received by the proximal anchor 50 by the superior vertebrae 10b and transmits said forces to the inferior vertebrae 10a. The countersink 300 can be formed by a separate drilling instrument or by providing a counter sink portion on a surgical drill used to from an opening in the body 10b.
In addition or in the alterative to creating the countersink 300, the shape of the inferior articular process IAP (which can include the facet in some embodiments) of the superior vertebrae 10b can be modified in order to also disperse the forces generated by the proximal anchor 50 contacting, abutting and/or wedging against the superior vertebrae 10b. For example, as shown in
In some embodiments, the clinician will have access to an array of devices 12, having, for example, different diameters, axial lengths, configurations and/or shapes. The clinician will assess the position of the body 28 with respect to the superior vertebrae and choose the device 12 from the array, which best fits the patient anatomy to achieve the desired clinical result. In some embodiments, the clinician will have access to an array of devices 12, having, for example, bodies 28 of different diameters, axial lengths. The clinician will also have an array of devices 12 with an array of proximal anchors 50, having, for example, different configurations and/or shapes. The clinician can choose the appropriate body 28 and proximal anchor 50 which best fits the patient anatomy to achieve the desired clinical result and then assess the position of the body 28 with respect to the superior vertebrae.
The body 28 of the fixation device can be advanced over the guidewire and through the sheath until it engages the vertebrae. The body 28 may be coupled to a suitable insertion tool prior to the step of engaging the fixation device 12 with the vertebrae. The insertion tool can be configured to engage the coupling 70 on the proximal end of the body 28 such that insertion tool may be used to rotate the body 28. In such an embodiment, the fixation device 12 is preferably configured such that it can also be advanced over the guidewire. Further disclosure of an insertion tool can be found in U.S. Patent Publication No. 11/296,881, filed on Dec. 8, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The insertion tool can be used to rotate the body 28 thereby driving the distal anchor 34 to the desired depth within the pedicle of the vertebrae for those embodiments of stabilization device 12 having a distal anchor 34. The surgeon can stop rotating the body 28 before the distal end of the tool contacts the bone. In embodiments in which a countersink is formed, the tool can be rotated until the distal end sits within the countersink at which point further rotation of the tool will not cause the distal anchor to advance further as further advancement of the body 28 causes it to be released from the tool. In this manner, over advancement of the distal anchor 32 into the vertebrae can be prevented or limited.
The proximal anchor 50 can be integral with the body 28, or can be attached and/or coupled to the body 28 following placement (partially or fully) of the body 28 within the vertebrae. In some embodiments, the anchor 50 can be pre-attached and/or coupled to the body 28 prior to advancing the body 28 into the vertebrae.
In embodiments where the proximal anchor 50 is separate from the body 28, once the body 28 is in the desired location, the proximal anchor 50 is preferably advanced over the body 28 until it reaches its desired position. This can be accomplished by pushing on the proximal anchor 50 or by applying a distal force to the proximal anchor 50. In some embodiments, the proximal anchor 50 is pushed over the body 28 by tapping the device with a slap hammer or similar device that can be used over a guidewire. In this manner, the distal end of the device 12 is advantageously minimally disturbed, which prevents (or minimizes) the threads in the bore from being stripped.
The access site can be closed and dressed in accordance with conventional wound closure techniques and the steps described above may be repeated on the other side of the vertebrae for substantial bilateral symmetry as shown in
It should be appreciated that not all of the steps described above are critical to procedure. Accordingly, some of the described steps may be omitted or performed in an order different from that disclosed. Further, additional steps may be contemplated by those skilled in the art in view of the disclosure herein, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
As discussed above, in embodiments without a proximal anchor, the proximal end 30 of the device can limit motion by abutting and/or wedging against a surface of the superior vertebrae 10b as the superior vertebrae 10b moves relative to the inferior vertebrae 10a. In some embodiments, a mass or growth can form around the proximal end 30 of the stabilization device 12, which can provide a support against which the superior vertebrae 10b can abut. The mass can advantageously grow around the superior vertebrae 10a and provide an abutment that is contoured to the shape of the superior vertebrae 10a.
For embodiments having a proximal anchor 50, the proximal anchors 50 of the devices 12 extend above the pars such that they abut against the inferior facet of the superior adjacent vertebrae. In this manner, the proximal anchor 50 can form a wedge between the vertebra limiting compression and/or extension of the spine as the facet of the superior adjacent vertebrae abuts against the proximal anchor 50. In this manner, extension can be limited while other motion is not. For example, flexion, lateral movement and/or torsion between the superior and inferior vertebra is not limited or constrained. In this manner, the natural motion of the spine can be preserved, especially for those patients with mild or moderate disc conditions. Preferably, the devices are implantable through a minimally invasive procedure and, more preferably, through the use of small percutaneous openings as described above. In this manner, the high cost, lengthy in-patient hospital stays and the pain associated with open procedures can be avoided and/or reduced. In some embodiments, the devices 12 may be removed and/or proximal anchors 50 may be removed in a subsequent procedure if the patient's condition improves. Once implanted, it should be appreciated that, depending upon the clinical situation, the proximal anchor 50 may be positioned such that it contacts surfaces of the adjacent vertebrae all of the time, most of the time or only when movement between the adjacent vertebrae exceeds a limit.
In some instances, the practitioner may decide to use a more aggressive spinal fixation or fusion procedure after an initial period of using the stabilization device 12. In one particular embodiment, the bone stabilization device 12 or a portion thereof may be used as part of the spinal fixation or fusion procedure. In one such application, the proximal anchor 50 can be removed from the body 28. The body 28 can remain in the spine and used to support a portion of a spinal fixation device. For example, the body 28 may be used to support a fixation rod that is coupled to a device implanted in a superior or inferior vertebrae. Examples of such fusion systems can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No 10/623,193, filed Jul. 18, 2003, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
As mentioned above, in some embodiments described above, it may be advantageous to allow the proximal anchor 50 to rotate with respect to the body 28 thereby preventing the proximal anchor 50 from causing the distal anchor 34 from backing out of the pedicle. In some embodiments, engagement features (as described below) may be added to the proximal anchor 50 to prevent rotation of the proximal anchor 50.
The above described devices and techniques limit motion of the spine by providing an abutment or wedge surface on one vertebrae or body structure. The abutment surface contacts, abuts, and/or wedges against a portion of a second, adjacent vertebrae or body structure so as to limit at least one degree of motion between the two vertebra or body structure while permitting at least one other degree of motion. While the above described devices and techniques are generally preferred, certain features and aspects can be extended to modified embodiments for limiting motion between vertebra. These modified embodiments will now be described.
In the embodiments described above, the device is generally inserted into the spine from a posterior position such that a distal end of the device is inserted into the first, inferior vertebrae and a proximal end of the device contacts or wedges against the second, superior vertebrae. However, it is anticipated that certain features and aspects of the embodiments described herein can be applied to a procedure in which the device is inserted from a lateral or anterior site. In such an embodiment, the distal end or side portion of the device may contact or wedge against the second superior vertebrae. Such embodiments provide a contact or wedge surface which is supported by one body structure to limit of the motion of an adjacent body structure.
In the embodiments described above, it is generally advantageous that the proximal anchor be radiopaque or otherwise configured such that in can be seen with visual aids used during surgery. In this manner, the surgeon can more accurately position the proximal anchor with respect to the superior and inferior vertebra.
Preferably, the clinician will have access to an array of fixation devices, having, for example, different diameters, axial lengths and, if applicable, angular relationships. These may be packaged one or more per package in sterile or non-sterile envelopes or peelable pouches, or in dispensing cartridges which may each hold a plurality of devices. The clinician will assess the dimensions and load requirements, and select a fixation device from the array, which meets the desired specifications.
The components described herein may be sterilized by any of the well known sterilization techniques, depending on the type of material. Suitable sterilization techniques include, but not limited to heat sterilization, radiation sterilization, such as cobalt 60 irradiation or electron beams, ethylene oxide sterilization, and the like.
The specific dimensions of any of the of the described herein can be readily varied depending upon the intended application, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. Moreover, although the present invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments of the invention including variations in dimensions, configuration and materials will be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein. In addition, all features discussed in connection with any some embodiments herein can be readily adapted for use in other embodiments herein. The use of different terms or reference numerals for similar features in different embodiments does not imply differences other than those which may be expressly set forth. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to be described solely by reference to the appended claims, and not limited to the preferred embodiments disclosed herein.
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/355,418 filed on Jun. 16, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61355418 | Jun 2010 | US |