The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for determining the stability margin, with respect to a possible self-oscillation, in a radio frequency repeater operating with a predetermined delay between an input and an output and having a feedback path between said output and said input. The invention also relates to a repeater system provided with such an apparatus.
Primarily, the invention concerns repeaters for use in cellular telecommunication systems, including two antennas and two sets of amplifier chains for amplifying a signal from a base station (down-link) and a signal from a cellular mobile telephone (up-link), respectively. In such a system, the repeater receives, amplifies and retransmits signals between the base station and the mobile telephone in both directions. However, the invention can be applied also to repeaters with only one signal path.
More particularly, the invention deals with the problem of ensuring that the repeater does not reach a state of instability because of self-oscillation, which may happen when the gain becomes too high. Because of the inevitable feed back between the output and the input, the too strongly amplified output signal will be transferred back to the input and will be amplified over again so as to cause a self-oscillation in the system.
The problem of preventing self-oscillation and securing a sufficient margin to such an instability in repeaters is well-known to those skilled in the art. Normally, in order to solve this problem, the input or output signal level (or power level) is monitored during operation of the repeater.
One way, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,095,528 (Leslie), is to continuously measure the average output power of the repeater and to determine whether this power level exceeds a predetermined threshold value, in which case the amplifier gain of the repeater is drastically reduced so as to restore a stable state of operation.
Another way, which is especially useful in GSM systems operating with time slots, see WO 97/33381 (Allgon), is to measure the time proportion during which the power level of an input signal exceeds a certain threshold value, whereupon the amplifier gain is reduced in case this time proportion is relatively large, such as 90% or even larger. This method may be combined with a test whether the difference between the maximum and minimum values of the input signal level is less than a given value.
However, in both these known methods, it is necessary to adjust the gain rather drastically in response to a detected rise of the signal level. Basically, this is because the criteria being used are met only when a state of instability is reached. Thus, in the known systems, it is not possible to determine the stability margin as such. Therefore, it is difficult to provide a smooth control of the amplifier gain of the repeater.
Against this background, a main object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for determining the stability margin, with respect to a possible self-oscillation, in a repeater of the kind discussed above.
Another object is to provide a method which would enable a smooth control of the repeater without drastic changes of the amplifier gain. Accordingly, it should be possible to establish whether the stability margin is increasing or decreasing.
These and other objects are achieved, according to the present invention, by taking two basic steps, viz.
In this way, it is possible to obtain a measure of the stability margin even when the system operates normally and is still stable. Consequently, any control measures can be taken already long before the system approaches a state of instability, and the control can therefore be performed smoothly, i.e. with relatively small adjustments of the amplifier gain of the system.
When using an appropriate control algorithm, the system can be retained in a stable state without self-oscillation.
The method can be carried out by means of a measurement receiver connected to the output and possibly also to the input of the repeater by means of a directional coupler, preferably via a switch alternating between the input and the output.
Advantageously, in order to establish the amplification or frequency response in the particular frequency band, provided that the spectral properties of the input signal are known, it is sufficient to measure the output signal as a function of the frequency. Then, the frequency response and the stability margin can be calculated.
The invention will be explained further below with reference to the appended drawings illustrating a repeater and a measurement receiver for determining the stability margin in accordance with the invention.
The repeater illustrated in
The first and second antennas 1,2 are connected via duplex filters 3,4 to two oppositely directed links, namely an uplink 10 for transferring signals originating from mobile telephones towards the associated base station, serving the cell in which the repeater and the mobile telephone are located, and a downlink 20 for transferring signals in the opposite direction. Each link includes a number of mutually parallel amplifier chains, each such chain handling a specific frequency or frequency band. In
In the transmission lines 5,6 connecting the respective antenna 1,2 and the respective duplex filter 3,4, directional couplers 30 and 40 are disposed so as to enable the sensing of signals in the respective transmission line segment 5,6. The sensed signals are fed via switches 31,41 and band pass filters 32,42 to a common switch 50 connected to a measurement receiver 60. In the measurement receiver 60, the particular signal is analysed, so that the signal level as a function of the frequency in the particular frequency band is obtained.
It will be appreciated that the directional couplers and switches are connected in such a way that any input or output signal in the respective transmission line 5,6 (the input or output of the system) can be analysed.
The inventive concept is based on a simplified model of the repeater as represented in
Because of the delay element 13, the effective amplification of the system of
where g1 is the gain of the amplifier 11, g2 is the gain in the (schematic) amplifier 14 in the feedback loop 12 and d is the delay in the delay element 13. From this formula, it is clear that the amplification is a harmonic function of the frequency.
A frequency response diagram of the output power of signal in a receiver is shown in
Accordingly, by using the apparatus shown in
When the spectral properties of the input signal are known beforehand, it is sufficient to measure the output power level P as a function of the frequency f, as illustrated in
Of course, the measured value of the magnitude of the harmonic variations can form the basis of a control signal controlling the gain of the repeater, so as to keep the stability margin substantially constant at a desired level. For this purpose, the measurement receiver 60 may be connected to a control unit 70 adapted to implement such a control. If desired, the measurement and control can be initiated remotely, e.g. from an operation and monitoring centre (not shown) via a telephone modem 80 or some other telecommunication link.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9902212-1 | Jun 1999 | SE | national |
This is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 09/542,951 filed Apr. 4, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,745,007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4317217 | Davidson et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4383331 | Davidson | May 1983 | A |
4562436 | Coleman et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4776032 | Odate et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
5095528 | Leslie et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5115514 | Leslie | May 1992 | A |
5455968 | Pham | Oct 1995 | A |
5802452 | Grandfield et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812933 | Niki | Sep 1998 | A |
5835848 | Bi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5930682 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6009324 | Pravitz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6259682 | Brown et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6459881 | Hoder et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466766 | Treatch | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469984 | Baker | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6731904 | Judd | May 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0905914 | Mar 1999 | EP |
WO9733381 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9733381 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040209568 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09542951 | Apr 2000 | US |
Child | 10769764 | US |