Method and apparatus for subsurface exploration

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6488105
  • Patent Number
    6,488,105
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 4, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 3, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A subsurface explorer (SSX) for exploring beneath the terrestrial surface of planetary bodies such as the Earth, Mars, or comets. This exploration activity utilizes appropriate sensors and instrument to evaluate the composition, structure, mineralogy and possibly biology of the subsurface medium, as well as perhaps the ability to return samples of that medium back to the surface. The vehicle comprises an elongated skin or body having a front end and a rear end, with a nose piece at the front end for imparting force to composition material of the planetary body. Force is provided by a hammer mechanism to the back side of a nose piece from within the body of the vehicle. In the preferred embodiment, a motor spins an intermediate shaft having two non-uniform threads along with a hammer which engages these threads with two conical rollers. A brake assembly halts the rotation of the intermediate shaft, causing the conical roller to spin down the non-uniform thread to rapidly and efficiently convert the rotational kinetic energy of the hammer into translational energy.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention is a subsurface explorer (SSX) for exploring beneath the surface of the terrestrial surface of planetary bodies such as the Earth, Mars, or comets.




2. Description of the Prior Art and Related Information




Conventional drilling requires that material be excavated entirely out of a hole, that the hole usually be lined to prevent collapse, and that power be transmitted to the excavation site from the surface by means of a relatively heavy mechanical linkage. The mass (and to a large degree the power and cost) of conventional systems grow proportionally to the desired depth of penetration since heavy mechanical components are distributed along the length of the excavated hole.




Excavation of compacted subsurface material requires energy. While the amount of energy needed to excavate a given volume of subsurface material varies considerably depending on the specific mineral and morphological structure of the medium, as well as the means for excavation, the specific energy requirements for conventional rotary drilling of medium strength rock is about 200 megajoules per cubic meter (Mj/m


3


). Typical modem rotary drilling equipment is just capable of operating with this level of performance.




Thus, there is a need for a simple, subsurface exploring system and method which requires less energy and support than conventional drilling.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention is a subsurface explorer (SSX) for exploring beneath the surface of the terrestrial surface of planetary bodies such as the Earth, Mars, moons or comets. The explorer may carry appropriate sensors and instruments to evaluate the composition, structure, mineralogy and possible biology of the subsurface medium, as well as perhaps returning samples of that medium back to the surface. The exploration capability of the SSX enables scientific research and resource exploration which may not be possible or may be prohibitively expensive by alternative means such as conventional drilling.




The SSX is a relatively small robotic vehicle capable of penetrating underground, through soil, rock, or mixtures thereof, to depths many times deeper than would be possible using conventional drilling techniques of comparable mass and power. This is possible because the vehicle excavates material ahead of it's travel, moves it only a short distance to the rear of the vehicle, and recompacts it behind the vehicle. The excavated and recompacted material may also be called “overburden.” Unlike prior art systems, with the present invention, the vehicle itself is compact and essentially self-contained, with power delivered to it over a fine tether which is paid out from the vehicle and becomes embedded in the recompacted medium behind the vehicle as it progresses.




One of the oldest techniques for excavation of compacted soil and rock is percussion, or hammering. Hammering of rock causes a network of fine cracks to form ahead of the hammer in zones where the compressive strength of the material is exceeded. These cracks interlock under repeated blows to ultimately create from the rock a collection of particles. In the absence of any active mechanism to remove the particles, they are ground into a fine powder. This powder can flow in a fashion similar to a fluid around the SSX as it advances, especially under the extreme acoustic excitation of the hammering action. Thus a simple, perhaps the simplest, mechanism for excavating the subsurface medium is to have an internal hammer mechanism in the SSX. In short, the SSX can be a self-contained pile driver.




The hammer mechanism of the SSX is preferably contained within the body of the SSX, which should be sealed against intrusion of dust generated by the percussive action. It should have a free volume in which to accelerate the hammer. Thus, the front end of the vehicle should not be the hammer mechanism itself, but instead may be an intermediate material which seals the front of an acceleration volume and transmits the percussive shock from the hammer to the surrounding medium. This front portion can be called a “chisel,” also referred to herein as a nose piece. The hammer impacts the chisel, which in turn imparts forces on the medium which are large compared to the compressive strength of the terrain material. The momentum of the hammer is conserved with the hammer-chisel assembly, depending somewhat on the amount of rebound in the hammer from the chisel. In the case of zero rebound, the final kinetic energy of the hammer-chisel assembly is equal to the initial kinetic energy of the hammer times the ratio of the hammer mass to the combined hammer-chisel mass. This ratio becomes adverse if the chisel becomes massive. To achieve good energy transfer from the hammer to the chisel, the hammer should be made as massive as possible, and the nose and shell should be as light as possible.




The hammer mechanism may comprise a hammer portion, used as a flywheel, rotated to high surface speeds. A non-uniform pitch thread on an intermediate shaft is used to convert the rotational motion to linear motion for the hammer portion, which in turn imparts force to a nose piece which pommels the material in front of the nose piece, causing vibrational exitation of the material thereby fracturing the material.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1



a


is a somewhat diagrammatic cross-sectional view illustrating parts of the forward portion of a subsurface explorer constructed according to one embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 1



b


is a somewhat diagrammatic cross-sectional view illustrating parts of the forward portion of a subsurface explorer constructed according to another embodiment of the present invention with the lateral dimension exaggerated for clarity;





FIG. 2



a


is a flow diagram illustrating a method performed by the system of

FIGS. 1



a


-


1




b


for imparting percussive force to the subsurface medium, hereafter called the composition material, of a planetary body;





FIG. 2



b


is a flow diagram illustrating a method performed by the

FIGS. 1



a


-


1




b


to return the hammer portion of the present invention to the top of its stroke;





FIG. 3

is a graph illustrating the path of a helical thread on an intermediate shaft of the subsurface explorer of

FIGS. 1



a


-


1




b;







FIG. 4



a


is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the detail of the intermediate shaft, the hammer portion and the roller assembly of the embodiment of

FIG. 1



a;







FIG. 4



b


an enlarged cross-sectional view of the detail of the intermediate shaft, the hammer portion and the roller assembly of the embodiment of

FIG. 1



b;







FIG. 5

is a front elevational view showing the intermediate shaft separated from the hammer mechanism and the vehicle assembly of the present invention;





FIG. 6

is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the nose cone and the lower body assembly of the present invention;





FIGS. 7



a


-


7




b


respectively are a horizontal cross-sectional view and a vertical cross-sectional view of an alternative capillary tether of the present invention formed using a two-part material such as epoxy resin; and





FIG. 8

is a graph illustrating a preferred variance in velocity of the conical rollers of the vehicle assembly of the present invention during operation.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




With reference to

FIG. 1



a


, a sub-surface exploring (SSX) vehicle


100


for exploring beneath a planetary terrain is shown, the planetary terrain having a surface, and the terrain comprising composition material. The vehicle


100


has a skin or body


102


extending from a front end


104


to a rear end


106


. The body may have a tapering and tether exit ports that would normally terminate at the rear of the assembly(not shown). The body


102


of the SSX


100


may be gun-drilled and honed on the inside to accommodate the inside mechanics and is preferably elongated.




The vehicle


100


may include a nose piece


108


disposed at the front end


104


to impart force on the terrain and thereby cause the vehicle


100


to fracture and penetrate the composition material in front of the nose piece


108


. The force imparted by the nose piece


108


is percussive in nature and tends to pulverize the composition material to a fine powder after repeated blows. The nose piece


108


comprises a cone-shaped (or ogive) nose connected to the body


102


, the cross-sectional area of the nose piece


108


exceeding that of the body


102


to create a gap between the side wall of the body


102


and the surrounding composition material during operation. As the vehicle


100


proceeds through the terrain, the pulverized material is forced backward along this gap and deposited behind the rear end


106


. The nose piece


108


is preferably removable to allow selection of nose pieces


108


of different materials and dimensions for particular composition materials.




In the illustrated embodiment, the vehicle


100


has a hammer mechanism contained within the body


102


for imparting percussive force to the nose piece


108


. The hammer mechanism includes a motor (e.g. an electric motor)


116


for spinning an intermediate shaft


112


having a variable pitch thread


118


and thereby rotating a hammer portion


110


. The hammer mechanism further comprises a braking mechanism


140


for stopping rotation of the intermediate shaft, allowing the hammer portion to continue to rotate down the thread to impart force on the nose piece


108


. The hammer mechanism is sealed against intrusion of composition material by the nose piece


108


and is spring mounted inside the vehicle


100


.




The hammer mechanism, or apparatus, imparts force to the nose piece


108


for the purpose of fracturing composition material in front of the nose piece


108


. The hammer mechanism comprises a hammer portion


110


capable of rotation. The hammer apparatus further comprises a translational portion for converting the rotating motion into translational motion. The translational portion may comprise the intermediate shaft


112


that is splined on the inside to engage and rotate with a motor shaft or inner splined shaft


114


, or a drive shaft that motor


116


rotates. The intermediate shaft


112


may be cut with one or more variable-pitch threads


118


on the outside of the intermediate shaft


112


so that one or more conical rollers


120


attached to the hammer portion


110


may smoothly accelerate hammer portion


110


axially. The acceleration could be in the over >3:1 speed range. The electric motor


116


is preferably adopted to operate on high voltage to keep resistive losses low.




The intermediate shaft


112


comprises a shaft having a top end and a bottom end, the top end connected to the inner splined shaft


114


of the electric motor such that the intermediate shaft


112


turns with the inner splined shaft


114


.




The hammer portion


110


comprises an annular hammer component defining a central opening receiving the intermediate shaft


112


for movement therealong. Outer bearings (e.g. ball bearings)


134


allow the hammer portion


110


to spin at a high speed (which may be approximately 10-20 KRPM or more) inside a honed bore of the body


102


and to slide (e.g. on bronze sleeves, not shown) along the inner bore of the body


102


. Alternatively, the lower end of the intermediate shaft may be supported by bearings, eliminating the need for the outer bearing


134


on the hammer.




The threads


118


extend along the outside surface of the intermediate shaft


112


. The threads


118


have a starting point


122


and an ending point


124


. The starting point


112


is located adjacent to the top end of the intermediate shaft


110


, and the ending point


124


is located adjacent the bottom end.




The conical rollers


120


protrude from the interior of the hammer portion


110


, such that the thread


118


guides the conical rollers


120


, and thereby the hammer portion


110


for axial movement. The conical roller


120


engages the starting point


122


of the thread


118


, and thereby the intermediate shaft


112


, causing the hammer portion


110


to be rotated as well. The kinetic energy of the hammer portion


110


is released when the rate of rotation of the intermediate shaft


112


is reduced (preferably to zero) by a braking mechanism comprising a spring


126


, a mechanical stop


128


, and a ratchet


140


. When this occurs, the stationary thread


118


accelerates the hammer portion


110


axially by means of the conical roller


120


traversing the thread


118


causing the hammer portion


110


to impart percussive force to the nose piece


108


.




An inner bearing


136


centers the intermediate shaft


112


, and allows vibration-free motion of the hammer portion


110


on the intermediate shaft


112


and the inner splined shaft


114


. The thread


118


ends above the free stroke of the lower ball bearing


136


so that the lower ball bearing


136


rotates and slides (e.g. also with a bronze sleeve) on the non-threaded surface of the intermediate shaft


112


.




Because the thread


118


, has a non-uniform pitch, comprising a low pitch near the starting point


122


of the thread and a high pitch near the ending point


124


of the thread, the forces on the hammer and the conical roller bearings can be maintained roughly constant during the hammer acceleration event.




The electric motor


116


also acts to rotate the inner splined shaft


114


in the opposite direction of rotation for causing the hammer portion


110


to return from the bottom position


124


to the top position


122


. When the intermediate shaft


112


is rotated in this reverse direction, the conical roller


120


engages the ending point


124


of the thread


118


such that when the intermediate shaft


112


is spun in the reverse direction, the hammer portion


110


is spun in the reverse direction. When electric motor


116


is stopped when ratchet


140


is actuated, forces are transmitted to stop the intermediate shaft


112


, while rotational kinetic energy continues for the hammer portion


110


. Thus the thread


118


causes the hammer portion


110


to accelerate axially, again, by means of the conical roller


120


, the conical roller traversing the thread


118


, this time, from the ending point


124


back to the starting point


122


.




At the point of impact


138


of the hammer portion


110


on the back of the nose piece


108


, a small amount of oil can be injected with each blow of the hammer portion


110


and thereafter circulated up the inner splined shaft


114


to lubricate all moving parts.




Because of energy requirements, it may not be desirable to drill a significant distance into the composition material by relying solely on internally-stored chemical energy, since a tank of chemical fuel provides enough energy to excavate only a small fixed multiple of the vehicle's own volume into the terrain. Thus it is preferable that energy be provided from an external source. Power is provided for significant distances (on the order of kilometers) by use of a high-voltage electrical 2-wire circuit or tether wire


132


. Mass or volume optimization of this power subsystem is based on the resistivity of the conductor (e.g. copper) and the dielectric breakdown strength of the insulator (e.g. Teflon) which is easily computed. Useful amounts of power (order of 100 Watts) can be delivered to significant depths (Km) using existing total tether volumes (about 1 liter), voltages of several hundred Volts, and acceptable tether power losses (˜20%). The performance of the tether


132


can be increased significantly if the two conductors are paid out as far apart from each other as possible at the rear end


106


of the vehicle


100


, so that the dielectric isolation of the terrain increases the breakdown voltage of the system. This is especially useful in environments where there is no liquid water; e.g. permafrost or anhydrous terrain.




Modulation of the electric current flowing through the tether


132


can also provide data transmission from the SSX


100


to the surface and vise versa in the same way that a modem can transmit information over a two-wire telephone circuit which also powers a telephone. Alternative techniques of delivering power from the surface by hydraulic, pneumatic, or chemical fuels yield the conclusion that electrical power is best, although there are some chemical fuel combinations which can be competitive if delivered through a fine capillary tether


132


. Fine capillaries can can be used to return samples of the composition material to the surface for analysis. This reduces the need to miniaturize instruments so that they can be contained within the SSX


100


itself, and also reduces the power requirements of the SSX


100


. For example, two capillaries


132


can be used to deliver a working fluid down one capillary and back up the other, carrying microscopic particles of the terrain medium upwards as part of the flow, or a single capillary can be used to alternately fill and flush a chamber in SSX


100


so as to bring small samples back to the surface. One possibility is to intentionally insert small spheres or other obstructions in the flow which nearly blocks the capillary


132


, sweeping anything ahead of them as they move. The pressure buildup behind these spheres then pushes the sample particles along against possible adhesion to the capillary walls.




It is possible to optimize the entire SSX


100


system based on the assumed specific energy requirement needed to excavate the subsurface medium, as well as the assumed frictional coefficient and overburden pressure which bears on the sides of the vehicle


100


as it slides forward. The total energy required to penetrate to a desired depth is the sum of the excavation energy and the friction energy (after losses are accounted for). The excavation energy is proportional to the total volume excavated, which is the product of the total depth times the frontal cross-sectional area of the SSX


100


. The friction energy is proportional to the sidewall friction force times the total depth. The sidewall friction is proportional to the total sidewall area, the frictional coefficient between the exterior of the SSX


100


and the subsurface medium, and the pressure which builds up between the SSX


100


and it's surroundings. This pressure, which grows as necessary to recompact the excavated medium into the hole behind the SSX


100


, can become quite large. Fortunately, the vast experience obtained in the petroleum drilling industry is that this pressure never rises much above the overburden pressure (i.e. the integrated weight per unit horizontal area of the terrain above the SSX). Since the overburden pressure grows at about 30 kPa/m (assuming a composition material density of 3 g/cc), the maximum pressure at depths of 1 Km is about 30 MPa. With a frictional coefficient of about 0.3, this means that the frictional energy required to advance one meter is about 10 kJ/m per square meter of sidewall cross-section. With a specific energy for excavation of 200 Mj per cubic meter, the energy required for excavation to advance one meter is 200 Mj per square meter of frontal area. Thus, at 1 km depth, the system can afford 20 times as much sidewall area as frontal area before the frictional area dominates. For a circular cross-section, the perimeter is π times the diameter, and the frontal area is π/4 of the diameter squared, so a sidewall area to frontal area of N implies that the length to diameter ratio should be N/4. Thus for N=20 (a depth of 1 Km) the ideal aspect ratio at that point is 5. However, since the overburden pressure rises linearly with depth, then the total energy lost to friction rises with the integral of the overburden pressure, or quadratically with depth. Meanwhile the total energy lost to excavation rises linearly with depth. Unless the aspect ratio changes with depth, the optimum average aspect ratio is greater than that which would be optimal at the maximum depth. For a maximum depth of 1 Km in medium-strength rock with a density of 3 g/cc, the ideal ratio of vehicle length to diameter is 8. For a maximum depth of 100 meters in the same rock, the ideal aspect ratio would be 80.




The SSX


100


should preferably be long and slender near the surface. As it descends, and tether


132


is paid out from inside the vehicle


100


, the length of the SSX


100


should be reduced if sidewall friction is to be kept under control. Thus packages of tether


132


should periodically be jettisoned from the vehicle


100


as the tether is spent, reducing the length of the vehicle.




Since SSX


100


is self-contained and is, thus, not a useful candidate for servicing, it is desirable to minimize the mechanical complexity of the excavation device, even if this results in a modest increase in the specific energy requirements for excavation.




The tether


132


trickles the energy to the SSX


100


almost continuously. In bursts, the resistive losses of the tether would dominate over the useful energy delivered to the SSX


100


. The vehicle


100


uses a brief burst of power delivered to the percussion hammer


110


in a very short period of time. Thus an energy storage and conversion mechanism may be used to store the trickled electrical energy and deliver it in a burst to the hammer mechanism.




For example, a strong man can swing a sledgehammer with a mass of 5 Kg to a kinetic energy of about 500 joules, which is sufficient to break rock at reasonable rates. If the system delivers an average of 50 Watts to the SSX


100


from the surface, then the system may get 500 joule hammer blows at a rate approaching 1 per 10 seconds. If it takes 200 Mj/m


3


to excavate the material, and if the system is to have an advance rate of or 0.4 mm/sec (about 1.3 meters per hour), then the frontal cross-section of the SSX is 12 cm


2


. This corresponds to a diameter of about 4 cm, which is not too different from the diameter of the face of the 5 Kg sledgehammer.




The nose piece


108


is the material which in fact excavates the terrain medium, and is thus subject to the extreme shock and abrasion of the terrain material. It should be extremely hard to avoid rapid rates of wear, and yet, due especially to the strong possibility of quartz and other hard minerals in the terrain, it is expected to wear at some rate. To achieve depths of order 1 Km, considerable sacrificial material is incorporated into the nose piece


108


. A corollary to this is that the initial shape of the nose piece


108


is almost irrelevant to the performance of the device since the sacrificial material will wear away into a natural blunt shape which depends only on the relative mechanical properties of the nose piece


108


material and the terrain material and, in the long term, is almost independent of the initial shape of the nose piece


108


. Thus it is not particularly important to spend excessive effort on optimizing the frontal shape of a deep-penetrating SSX


100


. It is desirable to have the cross-section of the nose piece


108


slightly larger than that of the body


102


of the SSX


100


, so that the sidewall friction on the main body


102


is reduced by allowing the terrain material to relax slightly and hold itself open somewhat with its own compressional hoop strength after the nose piece


108


passes. This also reduces the sidewall friction and wear on the sidewall of the SSX


100


, allowing the wall thickness of the body


102


to be reduced, which has a strong effect on the mass of the vehicle


100


. Another advantage of this shape is that small vanes at the rear of the SSX


100


could push against the interior of the hole created by the vehicle


100


to slightly offset the rear of the SSX


100


in the hole or the entire vehicle


100


can be hinged at or near the centerpoint to allow it to be “bent” by a steering actuator, providing some directional control to the impact of the hammer mechanism, allowing steering of the vehicle


100


.




Hazard avoidance (e.g. avoiding large rocks mixed with soil) would be accomplished by using an array of geophones at the surface (and possibly one in the SSX


100


) to listen to the echo of the percussive blows of the hammer device and thus to locate the SSX


100


and to map the subsurface environment. The depth of the vehicle


100


can be determined by measuring the amount of tether


132


paid out from inside the vehicle, and the approximate direction with respect to vertical can be inferred by the motion of a spring mounted inertial mass or other acceleration sensor within the SSX


100


itself. One control loop function is to adjust the amount of hammer


110


energy imparted in each blow, especially near the surface. If the sidewall friction is not adequate to prevent the entire SSX body


102


from moving backwards as the vehicle


100


is accelerated forwards, then the hammer


110


may make zero or negative net advancement on each hammer blow. The control system measures the motion of the vehicle


100


during both the acceleration and deceleration of the hammer portion


110


to determine if the vehicle


100


is moving. Rather than double-integrating the signal from an accelerometer, which would produce a very noisy measurement, it is better to have a spring mounted inertial mass with a position encoder which can directly measure the stroke distance of the SSX body


102


on both the acceleration and deceleration portions of the hammer portion


110


cycle. The static position of the mass during the windup of the hammer portion


110


would give a measure of the vertical vector. In addition, it is desirable to have rotational sensors also on this mass so that any rotational movement induced by a hammer blow is measured. On Earth, it would be possible to have a magnetic compass to give heading, but on some planetary missions (or Earth polar missions) there is either no magnetic field or it is ambiguous. Thus the rotation sensor can give an estimate of direction, which is augmented over the long term by the acoustic/seismic sensing array.




An additional novel feature of the system is that all elements of the vehicle


100


other than the nose piece


108


and exterior of the body


102


can and should be spring mounted inside the body


102


. The vehicle


100


will advance by some amount with each hammer portion


110


blow, but this distance may be short. This short stroke means that the interior components can be nearly totally shock isolated from the nose piece


108


and body


102


. The shock isolation of the interior elements of the vehicle


100


from the piece


108


has two advantages: it improves the transfer of kinetic energy from the hammer portion


110


to the nose piece


108


assembly and it protects all internal components from the extreme shock of the impact event between hammer


110


and nosepiece


108


.




Alternative means of solenoids, mechanically compressed gases (with and without a phase change), heat engines (i.e. using a solid or semi-solid hammer instead of the rotating portion


110


as the piston in a Stirling engine), and chemical explosions (e.g. electrolysis of water into hydrogen and oxygen) have been analyzed. All have been found wanting, since the overall conversion efficiency of the electric power into the kinetic energy of the hammer mechanism is well under 40% (and in some cases under 20%). However, a novel mechanical approach using a conventional electric motor


102


is described herein which will achieve as much as about 80% efficiency.




As in the prior example, the system may have 500 joules of energy in the combined hammer


110


-nose piece


108


system. If the hammer


110


and the nose piece


108


are equally massive, then the initial energy of the hammer mechanism should be 1000 joules at the time of impact with the nose piece


108


. The length to diameter aspect ratio of the SSX


100


has been deduced to be around 30-50, and with 50 watts of effective power (after the rotating portion-nose piece


108


impact, implying 100 Watts of average mechanical energy delivered by the hammering mechanism action) vehicle


100


diameters of 4 cm can be supported. With an aspect ratio of 30, the length of the vehicle


100


is 1.2 meters.




The nose piece


108


of the vehicle


100


, as noted above, has sacrificial material which wears away as the vehicle


100


goes deeper, and thus might be expected to have a length of perhaps 10 cm of this total length. The body


102


similarly is a hard and tough material to withstand the abrasion of the sidewall friction. If tough steels are used for these applications, and the thickness of the body


102


shell is 15% of the radius of the cylindrical vehicle


100


, then the mass of the nose piece


108


is about 1.1 Kg and the mass of the body


102


is about 3.2 Kg. The total vehicle


100


assembly is then 4.3 Kg. If the vehicle


100


diameter (sliding within the body


102


shell) is 3.4 cm, and it can be fabricated out of an extremely dense and hard material such as tungsten (density 19 gm/cc), then to get a vehicle


100


mass equal to the nose piece


108


mass requires a vehicle


100


with a length of 25 cm. It may be difficult to accelerate the hammer portion


110


to the necessary speeds in much less than its own length, so another 25 cm can be allocated for hammer portion


110


acceleration space. In practice the conservation of momentum is too simplistic an analysis to fully evaluate the relative mass of the hammer


110


and the nose piece


108


; actually, a shock wave propagates from the impact point of the hammer


110


through the nose piece


108


, making excess mass of nose piece


108


less objectionable than the conservative momentum conservation analysis shows.




The velocity which the hammer portion


110


should achieve to have 1000 joules of kinetic energy with a mass of 4.3 Kg is 22 meters per second. The uniform acceleration which may be needed to achieve this velocity in a distance of 25 cm is 930 m/s


2


, or 93 g's. The force which may be needed to achieve this acceleration is 4000 Newtons. The total duration of the hammer portion


110


stroke is about 24 msec. Since 1000 joules of energy are delivered to the nose piece in 24 msec, the rate of power conversion into linear kinetic energy is 40 kilowatts. This large rate of power conversion is the principal problem that was solved for the practical implementation of the SSX


100


by the novel approach here described.




The underlying concept of the hammer portion


110


for the subsurface explorer


100


is to use the hammer portion


110


as a flywheel to store mechanical energy from the electric motor


116


, and then use a simple but novel mechanism to convert the rotational kinetic energy of the hammer portion


110


into translational kinetic energy. That the hammer portion


110


can store the necessary energy when used as a flywheel is clear from computing the hoop stresses on a spinning cylinder. As described above, the hammer portion


110


should achieve a speed of about 22 meters per second prior to impact with the nose piece


108


, and thus the required energy can be stored in the hammer portion


110


when the hoop velocity at the radius of gyration is the same value. The radius of gyration of a uniform cylinder is about 0.7 of its geometric radius. Thus the hoop velocity of the rim should be at least 31 m/s. The hoop stress in a spinning cylinder is the density times the square of the rim speed. Assuming that the hammer portion


110


material is tungsten, the hoop stress in the hammer portion


110


is about 18 MPa. Fortunately, tungsten is not only an extremely dense material (which is used to make the hammer portion


110


relatively massive compared to the nose piece


108


and body


102


shell), but it is also an extremely strong material, with a tensile strength of about 4 GPa. Thus the required hoop stresses in the hammer portion


110


are easily supported by the material with large factors of safety. The brittleness of tungsten can be accomodated with a steel jacket around the hammer


110


for applications where the fatigue limit is reached.




The vehicle of

FIG. 1



a


may further comprise a tether system


148


for spooling one or more means for providing power and communication to the vehicle


100


and returning samples to the subsurface. The tether system


148


may include a spool for spooling two or more electrical conductors


132


leading from a point of origin to the vehicle


100


. The spool may also provide spooling for one or more capillary tubes


150


for moving fluids from the point of origin to the vehicle


100


. The electrical conductors


132


and the capillary tubes


150


are spooled out from within the vehicle


100


and packed into the composition material deposited behind the rear end


106


. With reference to

FIG. 1



b


, a somewhat diagrammatic cross-sectional view illustrating parts of the forward portion of a subsurface explorer constructed according to another embodiment of the present invention is shown with the lateral dimension exaggerated for clarity. As with the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1



a


, detail of the hammer mechanism for imparting force to the nose piece


108


on the front of the body


102


of a vehicle


100


is shown. The hammer mechanism shown includes a motor


116


, intermediate shaft


112


, hammer portion


110


and a braking mechanism


140


for stopping rotation of the intermediate shaft


112


. As with the embodiment of

FIG. 1



a


, the kinetic energy of the rotating hammer portion


110


is released when the rate of rotation of the intermediate shaft


112


is reduced (preferably to zero) by a braking mechanism comprising a spring


126


, a mechanical stop


128


, and a ratchet


140


.




As with the embodiment of

FIG. 1



a


, the vehicle


100


comprises a translational portion for converting the rotating motion of the hammer portion


110


into translational motion. The translational portion may comprise the intermediate shaft


112


that is splined on the inside to engage and rotate with a motor shaft or inner splined shaft


114


, or a drive shaft that motor


116


rotates. The intermediate shaft


112


may be cut with one or more variable-pitch threads


118


(detail not shown in

FIG. 1



b


) on the outside of the intermediate shaft


112


that engages one or more conical rollers


120


attached to the hammer portion


110


to smoothly accelerate hammer portion


110


axially.




With reference to

FIG. 2



a


, a flow diagram illustrating a method performed by the system of the present invention is shown for imparting force on a composition material. The hammer portion


110


is rotated with an electric motor


116


on an intermediate shaft


112


which has a helical thread


112


which engages conical rollers


120


protruding from the interior of the annular rotating portion


110


, step


200


. Once the hammer portion


110


is spun to the desired kinetic energy, the electric motor


116


is stopped by the braking mechanism


128


, or by shorting, loading, or reverse-biasing the windings of the electric motor


116


, step


202


or by actuating brake


140


with a solenoid. This braking action causes the rotating hammer portion


116


to continue to rotate with respect to the intermediate shaft


116


, step


204


. The helical thread


118


on the intermediate shaft begins to accelerate the spinning hammer


110


axially, converting rotational kinetic energy into linear, or translational, kinetic energy, step


206


.




With reference to

FIG. 3

, a graph illustrating the path of the helical thread


118


on the intermediate shaft


112


for multiple revolutions is shown. The path


300


has been unfolded for clarity. The helical thread


118


has non-uniform pitch, initially in a shape which applies approximately constant force on the hammer


110


via the conical rollers


120


, and then changes to a shape which is approximately parabolic or eliptical, as shown at location


302


, so that the hammer portion


110


accelerates uniformly down the bore of the inside body


102


. The inital shape is sloped so that the braking of the intermediate shaft does not cause excessive forces on the conical rollers


120


and their associated bearings. The thread shape changes to continue approximately constant force on the conical rollers


120


even after the brake


140


has halted the rotation of the intermediate shaft


112


. With reference back to

FIG. 2



a


, initially, the small mass of the intermediate shaft


112


compared to the hammer portion


110


mass causes the intermediate shaft


112


to be accelerated upwards faster than the hammer portion


110


is accelerated downwards towards the nose cone


108


, step


208


. This is possible since the intermediate shaft


112


is splined onto the drive shaft


114


of the motor


116


, and is free to slide up and down on the splined drive shaft


114


. At the top of the intermediate shaft


112


is located a two-toothed ratchet male end


130


. As the intermediate shaft


112


spins and rises under the braking action of the motor


116


and the helical thread


118


, the male ratchet end


130


engages a mating female ratchet end


142


attached to the spring


126


. A 2-count per rotation quadrature position encoder may be included on the motor


116


that allows the braking action to be initiated at the proper time so that the ratchet


140


teeth engage cleanly and almost fully without the possibility of partial engagement. When the ratchet


140


teeth engage, the intermediate shaft


112


, the splined shaft


114


, and the motor's


116


rotor all are despun to rest in one revolution or less by the spring


126


(e.g. 1000 Nt/cm spring constant) attached to the ratchet female


142


. The spring


126


compresses and rotates under the inertial forces of the hammer mechanism and shaft


112


assemblies. However, with a compression typically of only a few cm, the intermediate shaft


112


is brought to rest, and the hammer portion


110


is rotating at its full original speed on the helical thread


118


.




With reference back to

FIG. 3

, the helical thread


118


is shown unwound onto its projection onto a flat sheet, with multiple revolutions


300


shown for clarity. The conical roller


120


is captured within the cutouts which are the closed curves


300


in FIG.


3


. Assuming in

FIG. 3

the hammer portion


110


mass rotates so that it is moving from right to left, the roller


120


will follow the left edge of each closed loop


300


, accelerating downward. On the return stroke, the motor


116


accelerates the hammer portion


110


and the roller


120


follows the right-hand part of the curve


300


. The space between the right and left sides of the closed curve


300


is open, that is, it represents a cutout in the intermediate shaft


112


where, in principle, the conical roller


120


is captive anywhere within the curve


300


.




At the location


304


on the curve


300


, the area of transition to a more linear region for spring recoil and final rotation cancellation is shown. Location


306


illustrates a parabolic or elliptical recovery region for return of the hammer portion


100


to the top of the stroke after reversal and braking of the motor


116


.




With reference to

FIG. 4



a


, detail of the intermediate shaft and hammer assembly are shown. The threads


118


on the intermediate shaft


112


are cut with sloped sides so as to form threads


118


and to engage conical rollers


112


without slipping. This follows the usual practice in conical roller


120


bearings where the apex of the cones intersect at the axis of rotation so that no slippage is necessary for the cones to roll smoothly on one another. The conical rollers


120


are supported by heavy bearings


402


-


404


embedded in the hammer portion


110


, since the very large forces needed to accelerate the hammer portion


110


are imparted through the conical rollers


120


. two rollers


120


and threads


118


are preferred so that balanced forces are applied to the hammer portion


110


. More than two rollers


120


are possible, but the relatively large conical rollers


120


and the threads


118


on the intermediate shaft


112


to carry the large acceleration forces make two rollers


120


and threads


118


required more practical. This is driven by the fact that the intermediate shaft


112


is as small as possible given the loads, to allow the spinning hammer


110


to be as massive as possible.




The pitch of the thread


118


is preferably as fine as possible near the top of the non-uniform pitch thread


118


, so that there are minimal sudden translational forces applied to the intermediate shaft


112


and hammer portion


110


when the splined drive shaft


114


begins to slow down, and especially when the ratchet


140


teeth engage and the large forces come into play. Thus, the tradeoff between the desire for a fine pitch and a heavy thread


118


create a preference for two rollers


120


. The non-uniformity of the pitch of thread


118


also causes a preference for no more than two thread contact points along the length of the system, since only one of these contact points would, in general, make contact as the hammer portion


110


descends the non-uniform pitch of the thread


118


. Similar needs for balanced forces combined with large loads lead to the desire that the ratchet


140


have only two teeth, although more could be used, and their shape can be square rather than triangular (to permit bidirectional operation) and can be actuated by a solenoid rather than by the braking action of motor


116


.




When the hammer portion


110


gets to the bottom of the “parabolic” region of the thread


118


(actually, to get uniform vertical acceleration the shape would not be precisely parabolic, since it is decelerating horizontally as it accelerates vertically), almost all of its rotational energy has been converted to translational energy (i.e. the pitch of the thread


118


has changed by a factor of 3 or 4, so that about 90% or more of the rotational energy has been converted). The pitch of the thread


118


becomes uniform near the bottom end


104


, so that the axial force drops to near zero and the spring


126


drives the ratchet


140


back down. As it does so, the spring


126


counterrotates the ratchet


140


and so removes most of the remainder of the rotational energy from the hammer portion


110


, causing it to strike the nose piece


108


with almost no rotation. Small amounts of residual rotation are acceptable.




Upon impact, it is desirable to have a small amount of lubrication oil between the hammer portion


110


and the nose piece


108


at location


138


in FIG.


1


. The tremendous force of the impact between the hammer portion


110


and the nose piece


108


would cause this oil to be extruded up between the splined shaft


114


and the intermediate shaft


112


, between the intermediate shaft


112


and the hammer portion


110


, between the hammer portion


112


and the inside of the body


102


, and up additional vias in the system leading to all bearings and other moving parts. The hammer portion


110


nominally has ball bearings


134


at the top and near the bottom allowing it to spin freely inside the body


102


. These bearings


134


may have some appropriate bushing or cylinder-ring material (e.g. bronze) pressed over the outer race to slide inside the honed cylindrical skin. In addition, there is a similar inner ball bearing


136


with bushing sliding and rotating over the intermediate shaft


112


. The threads


118


cut in the intermediate shaft


112


end relatively high up on the shaft


112


, so that the inner bearing


136


need not engage anything but smooth, honed shaft


112


material anywhere in its cycle of motion. By having the conical rollers


120


at the top of the hammer portion


110


, the threaded region on the intermediate shaft


112


is kept away from the bearing region, and also the large impact forces of the hammer blow do not need to be transmitted past the bearings


136


to decelerate the bulk of the hammer material.




Additional vias in the system can allow gas compressed in front of the hammer portion


110


to escape into the thread


118


cutouts in the intermediate shaft


112


and ultimately vent behind the hammer portion


110


and thus not act as a shock absorber, reducing the effectiveness of the hammer portion


110


. The entire percussive assembly can be sealed, and can be run at reduced pressure if desired to reduce this cushioning effect. Some residual gas is desirable if the motor


116


is of the brush type, and also to carry lubricant around the inside as percussion atomizes small droplets of oil into the gas. For very cold environments (e.g. Mars polar missions, comets) it is possible to use a gas in equilibrium with its own liquid to provide lubrication (e.g. carbon dioxide, nitrogen).




With reference to

FIG. 4



b


, detail of the intermediate shaft


112


and hammer portion


110


and roller


120


assemblies according to an alternative embodiment to that shown in

FIG. 4



a


is shown. The threads


118


on the intermediate shaft


112


are not shown in

FIG. 4



b


. As with the detail shown in

FIG. 4



a


, the system includes the hammer portion


110


, intermediate shaft,


112


, splined drive shaft


114


, and conical rollers


120


.




The assembly of

FIG. 4



b


further includes a retainer plate


408


for retaining each conical roller


120


and bearing


402


-


404


assemblies. Four screw holes


412


on each retaining plate are further included to hold screws which hold the retainer plates


408


on the hammer portion


110


. The retaining plates


408


further comprise shear holding pin holes


410


having pins for holding the retainer plates


408


in place.




Also shown in

FIG. 4



b


are an upper flange


414


on the intermediate shaft for helping to secure the assembly against the body


102


, and a land


416


on the hammer for centering the hammer portion


110


within the body


102


. The hammer portion


110


is therefore not flush with the body


102


, but is slightly inside the bore of the body


102


, creating less friction and allowing gasses and oil to circulate.




With reference to

FIG. 2



b


, a flow diagram illustrating the method performed by the system of the present invention for returning the hammer portion


110


to the top of stroke is shown. The motor


116


is spun in the direction reverse of that for hammer portion


110


blow, step


230


. The electric motor


116


is again braked by the braking mechanism


140


, or by shorting, loading, or reverse-biasing the windings of the electric motor


116


, step


232


. The braking action again causes the hammer portion


110


to start to rotate with respect to the intermediate shaft


112


, but in the direction opposite as with the downward stroke, step


234


. The inertia of the hammer portion


110


causes the conical rollers


120


to ride up the opposite surface of the thread


118


from that used in the downward stroke, step


236


. This surface is also conical so that the rollers


120


make good rolling contact. As seen at location


306


in

FIG. 3

, again there is a parabolic section to accelerate the hammer portion


110


smoothly upwards so that its inertia carries it up over the steepest part of the curve, against the force of gravity. The hammer portion


110


then rolls up to the top of the thread


118


even with a very weak motor


116


, step


238


. The inertial force on the intermediate shaft


112


causes it to tend to descend down the splined shaft


113


: it is possible for it to engage a friction surface below on the face of the nose piece


108


or on the underside of the ratchet


150


wheel so that the braking of the intermediate shaft


112


is not dependent on the motor


116


characteristics. Thus there is no troublesome lower limit on the size or torque of the motor


116


needed to get the hammer portion


110


back to the starting position. Thus the motor


116


sizing is based on the available power budget, while the spinning hammer


110


energy is a function of how massive and fast the hammer portion


110


is to be spun. The only practical lower limit on the motor


116


size is based on the frictional losses in the bearings


134


. If desired, there could be a small detent at the top of the thread


118


so that the rollers


120


could statically rest at the top of the thread


118


without requiring continuous rotational acceleration. The intermediate shaft


112


is retained at the bottom of the splined shaft


114


to prevent it from falling normally into rubbing contact with the nose piece


108


face. The motor


116


, internal bearings or other bearings need to be sized to carry this static axial load.




Alternatively, if the motor


116


does have enough torque, then the intermediate shaft


112


may be spun in the forward direction without braking to cause the hammer portion


110


to rotate back up to the starting position.




With reference to

FIG. 5

, the intermediate shaft separated from the hammer mechanism and vehicle


100


assembly is shown. The thread


118


direction is reversed in

FIG. 5

in order to accommodate an electric motor


116


which is made to spin in a forward direction opposite of that in

FIG. 1



a.






With reference to

FIG. 6

, a diagram illustrating the detail of the nose cone


108


and lower body


102


assembly is shown. At the bottom of the intermediate shaft


112


is a lower support bearing


604


on which the intermediate shaft


112


spins. Below the lower support bearing


604


is a stack of shims and belleeville spring washers


606


which is used to lift the intermediate shaft


112


away from contact with the nose piece


108


and provides a measure of travel between the nose piece


108


and the intermediate shaft


112


to keep the lower support bearing


604


from receiving shock.




The nose piece


108


further comprises a threaded region


608


so that the nose piece


108


can be screwed within the body


102


in replaceable fashion.




An exemplary material from which the nose piece


108


, body


102


, and intermediate shaft


112


may be made from is VASCOMAX made by Teledyne, Inc. of Montebello, Calif. The military specification for VASCOMAX is MIL-S-46850D.




The efficiency of the hammer portion


110


is very high: the electric motor


116


can be made very efficient, especially since there is no severe requirement to miniaturize it. It can be wound to work directly off the high voltage supplied by the optimal tether


122


, so that there is no loss due to voltage conversion. There is preferably no gearhead stepping down the output RPM of the motor


116


, as would normally be expected in conversion of electricity to a large-force application. The hammer portion


110


used as a flywheel is well matched as a load to the electric motor


116


, absorbing mechanical energy over the range of output speeds where electric motors produce maximum output efficiency. The hammer portion


110


has a conical roller mounted on ball (or roller) bearings


134


, and converts the rotational kinetic energy into translational kinetic energy with relatively high efficiency. It is not inconceivable that the net efficiency in converting tether


122


power into spinning hammer


110


kinetic energy could approach 80%, where other competing approaches (e.g. high pressure gasses) would generally be between 20% and 30% efficient, and regenerative explosive mixtures would be less than that (15%), and solenoids less than that (5%, and also are unacceptably large and heavy to get the necessary kinetic energy). The ratchet


140


and spring


126


assembly serve primarily as a shock absorber and to prevent the need for excessive braking force by the motor


116


and it's bearings. The spring


126


for the ratchet


140


need not absorb more than a few percent of the energy of the hammer


110


in performing it's duties, and the efficiency with which it redelivers this energy is not very important. The spinning hammer mechanism is relatively economical from the standpoint of moving parts, and the bearing surfaces are relatively large and do not require extreme contact stresses. Provision for continuing lubrication is straightforward. There are no significant machining or assembly issues.




With reference to

FIGS. 7



a


-


7




b


, an alternative to the electrical and/or capillary tether


132


is to form a tether


132


in place using a two-part material such as epoxy resin. An assembly at the base of the tether


132


combines the two parts, the resin and the catalyst, to form the outer wall of a larger tube


708


than could be stored entirely within the vehicle


100


. The relatively slow rate of advance of the subsurface vehicle


100


permits the epoxy to harden within the space of a mold


706


, which forms the basic (presumably cylindrical) shape of the tube


708


, plus possible additional cavities


710


such as channels molded into the walls of the tube


708


. The primary channel in the center of the tube


708


carries a significant part of the cuttings fully from the excavation mechanism, eliminating the need to recompact the cuttings to the original density of the subsurface medium. In principle, it could also be large enough to carry sample cores back to the surface, or to bring down replacements for worn elements of the down-hole mechanism. The additional channels


702


-


704


molded into the wallcarries the epoxy in a first epoxy chamber


702


, and the epoxy catalyst in a second epoxy chamber


704


. The electrical power and signal wires and possibly drilling fluids or chemical fuels can be carried in additional channels


710


as well. The main tube


708


and each of the additional channels


710


may be molded by an appropriately shaped mold


706


material (such as stainless steel coated with a non-stick material like Teflon(™), and the motion of the vehicle


100


is slow enough that the material is set within the mold


706


. As the rigid material emerges from the mold


706


, it is sealed at the terminus of mold


706


with seals such as O-rings


712


. This allows fluids to flow through the molded cavities


702


-


704


, into mold channels


714


, and then, in the case of the epoxy and the catalyst, to a mixing chamber


718


at the back of the mold. The two parts are extruded together by baffles


719


in thin sections so that the diffusion of the two parts together suffice for mixing, together with whatever turbulence might be present or induced in the flow by appropriate structures, active or passive. In the case of other fluids or wires or other utility lines, these can exit the front of the mold assembly


720


.




With reference to

FIG. 8

, a graph illustrating a preferred variance in velocity of the conical rollers


120


is shown. Due to the geometry of the conical rollers


120


, intermediate shaft


112


, and hammer portion


110


, with the following assumptions:




Initial slope of thread


118


is 0° (horizontal)




Final slope of thread


118


is 90° (vertical)




Intermediate shaft


112


stops instantly




Initial energy in hammer portion


110


(entirely rotational=½Iw


0




2


) is completely converted to translational energy at end of thread


118


: E=½Mv


f




z






no friction losses






v(θ)=velocity of conical roller


120


on thread


118










v


x


(θ)=v(θ)cos θ=component of velocity due to hammer portion


110


rotation−w(θ)·1








v


y


(θ)=v(θ)sin θ=component of velocity due to downward (linear) motion of hammer






portion


110


,




the non uniform thread


118


should preferably cause the velocity of the conical rollers


120


to vary according to the formula:








v


(θ)=


v




f


(sin


2


θ+(r


1


/r


0


)


2


cos


2


θ)


½








as the conical roller


120


rolls from the top of the curve (θ=0°) to the bottom (θ−90°), wherein






θ=slope of thread, or curve, from horizontal








V


f


=final velocity=v(90)=w


0


r


0










w


0


=initial angular velocity of spinning hammer













r
0

=








radius





of





gyration








of





spinning





hammer







=








I

/
M

-

definition





of






r
0














I
=

rotational





inertia





of





hammer





around





spin





axis













M
=

mass





of





hammer










r
1

=





average





radius





from





conical





roller





line





contact





to


















Hammer
'


s





axis





of





rotation














For constant force between conical rollers and intermediate shaft thread:






v(θ)


2


/R(θ)=constant from a=v


2


/r, acceleration of an object moving with velocity, v, along a curved path, r=radius of curvature








R(θ)=radius of curvature of flattened Intermediate Shaft thread; a function of the slope at any point along the curve








v(θ)


2


/R(θ)=K→R(θ)=(1/K)v(θ)


2


=(1/K)v


f




2


(sin


2


θ+(r


1


/r


0


)


2


cos


2


θ)








K=v(0)


2


/R(0)=V(90)


2


/R(90)






R(0) is the initial radius of curve




R(90) is the final radius of curve




It should be noted that:






v(0)=w


0


r


1










v(90)=v


f


=w


0


r


0










(1/K)v


f




2


=(R(0)/v(0)


2


)(v


f




2


)=R(0)/(w


0


r


1


)


2


(w


0


r


0


)


2


=R(0)(r


0


r


1


)


2












R


(θ)=


R


(0)(r


0


/r


1


)


2


(sin


2


θ+(r


1


/r


0


)


2


cos


2


θ).






Alternative embodiments which employ the same concept include changing the number of threads


118


on the intermediate shaft, using somewhat different geometries in place of the conical rollers


120


, changing the number or shape of teeth on the brake ratchet


140


assembly, actuating brake


140


with a solenoid, etc. The underlying concept is to spin the hammer


110


as a flywheel to surface speeds greater than the needed hammer velocity, and then to use a non-uniform pitch on a thread


118


to convert the rotational motion to linear motion. The use of the brake ratchet


140


assembly (perhaps with solenoid actuation) is the illustrated embodiment, but other means exist, such as friction clutches or hydraulic mechanisms, to perform its function.




It will thus be seen that changes may be made in carrying out the above system and method and in the construction set forth without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, it is intended that any and all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.



Claims
  • 1. A vehicle for exploring beneath the surface of a planetary terrain made of composition material, comprising:a body having a front end and a rear end; a nose piece fixed to the front end for imparting force to the terrain so that the vehicle penetrates the composition material in front of the nose piece and leaves the composition material deposited behind the rear end; and a tether system for providing power and communication to the vehicle and returning subsurface samples, the tether system comprising: two or more electrical conductors leading from a point of origin to the vehicle; one or more capillary tubes for moving fluids from the point of origin to the vehicle; and a spool for spooling the electrical conductors and the capillary tubes from within the vehicle and packing the electrical conductors and the capillary into the composition material deposited behind the rear end.
  • 2. A hammer apparatus for imparting force to a nose piece for the purpose of fracturing composition material in front of the nose piece, comprising:an intermediate shaft adapted for rotation relative to the nose piece; a hammer portion adapted for rotation relative to the nose piece and of a shape receivable over the intermediate shaft in sliding engagement therewith; a braking structure connected to the intermediate shaft; and wherein the braking structure is configured to brake the rotation of the intermediate shaft and convert the rotation of the hammer portion into translational motion.
  • 3. The hammer apparatus of claim 2, wherein the hammer portion is substantially annular in shape and is receivable over the intermediate shaft in sliding engagement therewith.
  • 4. The hammer apparatus of claim 2, wherein the intermediate shaft has at least one outwardly directed thread of variable pitch extending some distance along the length of the intermediate shaft.
  • 5. The hammer apparatus of claim 4, wherein:the hammer portion further comprises at least one roller engaging the thread in a guiding relationship for guiding the hammer portion; the intermediate shaft has a top end and a bottom end; and the thread has a relatively low pitch at the top end of the intermediate shaft and a relatively high pitch at the bottom end of the intermediate shaft, whereby the hammer is accelerated downwardly when the rotation speed of the intermediate shaft is reduced.
  • 6. The hammer apparatus of claim 5, wherein an electric motor is configured to rotate the intermediate shaft, and the hammer portion in an opposite direction of rotation to accelerate the hammer portion upwardly along the intermediate shaft, causing the roller to traverse the thread from the bottom end of the intermediate shaft to top end of the intermediate shaft.
  • 7. The hammer apparatus of claim 2, wherein:the hammer portion, intermediate shaft and braking structure are housed within a body having a front end and a rear end; said nose piece is fixed to the front end of the body; the hammer portion imparts a percussive force on said nose piece; and said nose piece and body are configured such that the percussive force on the nose piece causes composition material in front of the nose piece to be deposited behind the rear end of the body.
  • 8. The hammer apparatus of claim 7, wherein the body is elongated between the front end and the rear end.
  • 9. The hammer apparatus of claim 8, wherein said nose piece and body are sealed against intrusion of composition material.
  • 10. The hammer apparatus of claim 9, wherein the hammer portion, intermediate shaft and braking mechanism are spring mounted within the body.
  • 11. The hammer apparatus of claim 9, wherein said nose piece and the body are configured such that the cross-sectional area of the nose piece exceeds that of the body, thereby reducing friction between the composition material and the side walls of the body during operation.
  • 12. A system for converting rotational kinetic energy into translational kinetic energy comprising:an intermediate shaft capable of rotation; a thread of non-uniform pitch having a start point and an end point, the thread having a low pitch adjacent the start point and a high pitch adjacent the end point; an annular hammer potion having a hollow center potion receiving the intermediate shaft; and at least one conical roller for movement therealong carried by the hammer portion and engaging the thread such that when the intermediate shaft and hammer potion are rotated together and the rotation speed of the intermediate shaft is suddenly reduced the conical roller follows the thread thereby converting the kinetic energy of the hammer portion from rotational energy into translational energy as the conical roller moves from the low pitch portion of the thread to the high pitch portion of the thread.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is based on provisional patent application serial No. 60/114,851 filed Jan. 4, 1999.

GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS

The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention pursuant to NAS7-1407 awarded by NASA.

US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
3480092 Reinold Nov 1969 A
3756328 Sudnishnikov et al. Sep 1973 A
3865200 Schmidt Feb 1975 A
3952813 Chepurnoi et al. Apr 1976 A
4974687 Kayas Dec 1990 A
5311950 Spektor May 1994 A
5377551 Vacquer Jan 1995 A
5603383 Wentworth et al. Feb 1997 A
5662180 Coffman et al. Sep 1997 A
5850884 Rodger et al. Dec 1998 A
5934386 Prater et al. Aug 1999 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Clemmow, “The Design of Percussive Drilling Bits,” Mining & Minerals Engineering, Mar., 1965, pp. 259-267.
Fairhurst, “Wave Mechanics of Percussive Drilling—Part 1,” Mine & Quarry Engineering, Mar., 1961, pp. 122-130, 27, No. 3.
Fairhurst, “Wave Mechanics of Percussive Drilling—Part 2,” Mine & Quarry Engineering, Apr., 1961, pp. 169-178, 27, No. 4.
Fairhurst, “Wave Mechanics of Percussive Drilling—Part 3,” Mine & Quarry Engineering, Jul., 1961, pp. 327-328, 27, No. 7.
Hartman, “Basic Studies of Percussion Drilling,” Mining Engineering, Jan., 1959, pp. 68-75.
Samuel, “Percussion Drilling . . . Is It a Lost Technique? A Review,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1996, pp. 741-747.
“U.S. Military Specification MIL-S-46850D,” Jun. 16, 1997, 18 pp.
“VascoMax T-200, T-250/T-300,” 1985, Teledyne Vasco, pp. 2-3.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/114851 Jan 1999 US