Environments in which inventories of objects are managed, such as products for purchase in a retail environment, may be complex and fluid. For example, a given environment may contain a wide variety of objects with different sizes, shapes, and other attributes. Such objects may be supported on shelves in a variety of positions and orientations. The variable position and orientation of the objects, as well as variations in lighting and the placement of labels and other indicia on the objects and the shelves, can render detection of structural features such as the edges of the shelves difficult.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
In retail environments in which a plurality of products is supported on shelves, systems may be configured to capture images of the shelves and determine, from the images, various information concerning the products. For example, price labels may be located and decoded within the image, for use in ensuring that products are labelled with the correct prices. Further, gaps between products on the shelves may be identified as potentially indicating that one or more products are out of stock and require replenishment. The above determinations may require the identification of distances between the capture device and the shelf edges to describe the three-dimensional structure of the shelf edges, for use as reference structures for the identification of labels, products, gaps, and the like.
The identification of shelf edges from depth measurements is complicated by a variety of factors, including the proximity to the shelf edges of products having a wide variety of shapes and orientations. Such factors also include lighting variations, reflections, obstructions from products or other objects, and the like.
Examples disclosed herein are directed to a method of detecting an edge of a support surface by an imaging controller. The method includes: obtaining a plurality of depth measurements captured by a depth sensor and corresponding to an area containing the support surface; selecting, by the imaging controller, a candidate set of the depth measurements based on at least one of (i) an expected proximity of the edge of the support surface to the depth sensor, and (ii) an expected orientation of the edge of the support surface relative to the depth sensor; fitting, by the imaging controller, a guide element to the candidate set of depth measurements; and detecting, by the imaging controller, an output set of the depth measurements corresponding to the edge from the candidate set of depth measurements according to a proximity between each candidate depth measurement and the guide element.
Further examples disclosed herein are directed a to computing device for detecting an edge of a support surface, comprising: a memory; and an imaging controller including: a preprocessor configured to obtain a plurality of depth measurements captured by a depth sensor and corresponding to an area containing the support surface; a selector configured to select a candidate set of the depth measurements based on at least one of (i) an expected proximity of the edge of the support surface to the depth sensor, and (ii) an expected orientation of the edge of the support surface relative to the depth sensor; a guide generator configured to fit a guide element to the candidate set of depth measurements; and an output detector configured to detect an output set of the depth measurements corresponding to the edge from the candidate set of depth measurements according to a proximity between each candidate depth measurement and the guide element.
The client computing device 105 is illustrated in
The system 100 is deployed, in the illustrated example, in a retail environment including a plurality of shelf modules 110-1, 110-2, 110-3 and so on (collectively referred to as shelves 110, and generically referred to as a shelf 110—this nomenclature is also employed for other elements discussed herein). Each shelf module 110 supports a plurality of products 112. Each shelf module 110 includes a shelf back 116-1, 116-2, 116-3 and a support surface (e.g. support surface 117-3 as illustrated in
More specifically, the apparatus 103 is deployed within the retail environment, and communicates with the server 101 (via the link 107) to navigate, autonomously or partially autonomously, the length 119 of at least a portion of the shelves 110. The apparatus 103 is equipped with a plurality of navigation and data capture sensors 104, such as image sensors (e.g. one or more digital cameras) and depth sensors (e.g. one or more Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors, one or more depth cameras employing structured light patterns, such as infrared light), and is further configured to employ the sensors to capture shelf data. In the present example, the apparatus 103 is configured to capture a plurality of depth measurements corresponding to the shelves 110, each measurement defining a distance from the depth sensor to a point on the shelf 110 (e.g., a product 112 disposed on the shelf 110 or a structural component of the shelf 110, such as a shelf edge 118 or a shelf back 116).
The server 101 includes a special purpose imaging controller, such as a processor 120, specifically designed to control the mobile automation apparatus 103 to capture data (e.g. the above-mentioned depth measurements), obtain the captured data via a communications interface 124 and store the captured data in a repository 132 in a memory 122. The server 101 is further configured to perform various post-processing operations on the captured data and to detect certain structural features—such as the shelf edges 118—within the captured data. The post-processing of captured data by the server 101 will be discussed below in greater detail. The server 101 may also be configured to determine product status data based in part on the above-mentioned shelf edge detections, and to transmit status notifications (e.g. notifications indicating that products are out-of-stock, low stock or misplaced) to the mobile device 105 responsive to the determination of product status data.
The processor 120 is interconnected with a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as the above-mentioned memory 122, having stored thereon computer readable instructions for executing control of the apparatus 103 to capture data, as well as the above-mentioned post-processing functionality, as discussed in further detail below. The memory 122 includes a combination of volatile (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory). The processor 120 and the memory 122 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. In an embodiment, the processor 120, further includes one or more central processing units (CPUs) and/or graphics processing units (GPUs). In an embodiment, a specially designed integrated circuit, such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), is designed to perform the shelf edge detection discussed herein, either alternatively or in addition to the imaging controller/processor 120 and memory 122. As those of skill in the art will realize, the mobile automation apparatus 103 also includes one or more controllers or processors and/or FPGAs, in communication with the controller 120, specifically configured to control navigational and/or data capture aspects of the apparatus 103. The client device 105 also includes one or more controllers or processors and/or FPGAs, in communication with the controller 120, specifically configured to process (e.g. to display) notifications received from the server 101.
The server 101 also includes the above-mentioned communications interface 124 interconnected with the processor 120. The communications interface 124 includes suitable hardware (e.g. transmitters, receivers, network interface controllers and the like) allowing the server 101 to communicate with other computing devices—particularly the apparatus 103, the client device 105 and the dock 108—via the links 107 and 109. The links 107 and 109 may be direct links, or links that traverse one or more networks, including both local and wide-area networks. The specific components of the communications interface 124 are selected based on the type of network or other links that the server 101 is required to communicate over. In the present example, as noted earlier, a wireless local-area network is implemented within the retail environment via the deployment of one or more wireless access points. The links 107 therefore include either or both wireless links between the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 105 and the above-mentioned access points, and a wired link (e.g. an Ethernet-based link) between the server 101 and the access point.
The memory 122 stores a plurality of applications, each including a plurality of computer readable instructions executable by the processor 120. The execution of the above-mentioned instructions by the processor 120 configures the server 101 to perform various actions discussed herein. The applications stored in the memory 122 include a control application 128, which may also be implemented as a suite of logically distinct applications. In general, via execution of the control application 128 or subcomponents thereof, the processor 120 is configured to implement various functionality. The processor 120, as configured via the execution of the control application 128, is also referred to herein as the controller 120. As will now be apparent, some or all of the functionality implemented by the controller 120 described below may also be performed by preconfigured hardware elements (e.g. one or more Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs)) rather than by execution of the control application 128 by the processor 120.
Turning now to
In the present example, the mast 205 supports seven digital cameras 207-1 through 207-7, and two LIDAR sensors 211-1 and 211-2. The mast 205 also supports a plurality of illumination assemblies 213, configured to illuminate the fields of view of the respective cameras 207. That is, the illumination assembly 213-1 illuminates the field of view of the camera 207-1, and so on. The sensors 207 and 211 are oriented on the mast 205 such that the fields of view of each sensor face a shelf 110 along the length 119 of which the apparatus 103 is travelling. The apparatus 103 is configured to track a location of the apparatus 103 (e.g. a location of the center of the chassis 201) in a common frame of reference previously established in the retail facility, permitting data captured by the mobile automation apparatus to be registered to the common frame of reference.
To that end, the mobile automation apparatus 103 includes a special-purpose controller, such as a processor 220, as shown in
The processor 220, when so configured by the execution of the application 228, may also be referred to as a controller 220 or, in the context of shelf edge detection from captured data, as an imaging controller 220. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the functionality implemented by the processor 220 via the execution of the application 228 may also be implemented by one or more specially designed hardware and firmware components, such as FPGAs, ASICs and the like in other embodiments.
The memory 222 may also store a repository 232 containing, for example, a map of the environment in which the apparatus 103 operates, for use during the execution of the application 228. The apparatus 103 may communicate with the server 101, for example to receive instructions to initiate data capture operations, via a communications interface 224 over the link 107 shown in
In the present example, as discussed below, one or both of the server 101 (as configured via the execution of the control application 128 by the processor 120) and the mobile automation apparatus 103 (as configured via the execution of the application 228 by the processor 220), are configured to process depth measurements captured by the apparatus 103 to identify portions of the captured data depicting the shelf edges 118. In further examples, the data processing discussed below may be performed on a computing device other than the server 101 and the mobile automation apparatus 103, such as the client device 105. The data processing mentioned above will be described in greater detail in connection with its performance at the server 101, via execution of the application 128.
Turning now to
The control application 128 includes a preprocessor 200 configured to obtain depth measurements corresponding to the shelves 110 and the products 112 supported thereon, and to preprocess the depth measurements, for example by filtering the depth measurements prior to downstream processing operations. The control application 128 also includes a selector 204 configured to select a candidate set of depth measurements from the preprocessed depth measurements (i.e., the output of the preprocessor 200). As will be discussed below, the candidate set of depth measurements are depth measurements considered likely to correspond to shelf edges 118. The control application 128 also includes a guide generator 208 configured to generate a guide element (such as a curve or a plane) against which the above-mentioned candidate set of depth measurements is evaluated by an output detector 212 to detect an output set among the candidate set of depth measurements. The output set of depth measurements contains the depth measurements considered to have the greatest likelihood of corresponding to shelf edges 118.
The functionality of the control application 128 will now be described in greater detail. Turning to
At block 305, the controller 120, and in particular the preprocessor 200, is configured to obtain a plurality of depth measurements captured by a depth sensor and corresponding to an area containing the above-mentioned support surface. In other words, in the present example the depth measurements correspond to an area containing at least one shelf support surface 117 and shelf edge 118. The depth measurements obtained at block 305 are, for example, captured by the apparatus 103 and stored in the repository 132. The preprocessor 200 is therefore configured, in the above example, to obtain the depth measurements by retrieving the measurements from the repository 132.
The depth measurements can take a variety of forms, according to the depth sensor employed (e.g. by the apparatus 103) to capture the measurements. For example, the apparatus 103 can include a lidar sensor, and the depth measurements therefore include one or more lidar scans captured as the apparatus 103 travels the length of an aisle (i.e., a set of adjacent shelf modules 110). The lidar sensor of the apparatus 103 captures depth measurements by sweeping a line of laser light across the shelves 110 through a predetermined set of sweep angles and determining, for each of a the sweep angles, a group of depth measurements along the line.
Thus, in the example illustrated in
In other examples, the apparatus 103 captures the depth measurements with the use of a depth camera, such as a stereoscopic camera including a structured light projector (e.g. which projects a pattern of infrared light onto the shelves 110). In such examples, referring to
Returning to
The control application 128 is then configured to proceed to block 310. At block 310, the control application 128, and more specifically the selector 204, is configured to select a candidate set of the depth measurements obtained at block 305. The candidate set of depth measurements is selected based on at least one of an expected proximity of the shelf edge 118 to the depth sensor, and an expected orientation of the shelf edge 118 relative to the depth sensor. As will be discussed in greater detail below, the apparatus 103 is assumed by the selector 204 to travel in a direction substantially parallel to the shelf edge 118. As a result, the distance between the sensor (e.g. lidar sensor 404 or depth camera 504) is expected to remain substantially constant throughout the captured data. Further, because the support surfaces 117 extend from the shelf backs 116 toward the aisle in which the apparatus 103 travels, the shelf edges 118 are expected to be closer to the apparatus 103 than other structures (e.g. products 112) depicted in the captured data. Still further, each shelf edge 118 is assumed to have a known orientation. For example, each shelf edge 118 may be expected to be a substantially vertical surface. As will be seen below, when the data captured at block 305 captured with the lidar sensor 404, the candidate set of measurements is selected based on an expected proximity to the depth sensor, and when the data captured at block 305 is captured with the depth camera 504, the candidate set of measurements is selected based on an expected orientation to the depth sensor.
Turning to
At block 605, the selector 204 is configured to select a sweep angle. As seen in
At block 610, for the selected sweep angle, the selector 204 is configured to select the minimum depth measurement corresponding to that sweep angle. Thus, referring again to the scan 416-1, the selector 204 is configured to select the minimum depth measurement among the values d-60-1, d-60-2, d-60-3, d-60-19, and d-60-20. In the present example, when the depth measurements obtained at block 305 include a plurality of lidar scans (e.g., the scans 416-1 through 416-4 shown in
In some examples, rather than selecting the minimum depth at block 610, the selector 204 is configured to select a representative sample for each sweep angle other than the minimum depth measurement. For example, the selector 204 can be configured to select the median of the depth measurements for each sweep angle. Such an approach may be employed by the selector 204 in some embodiments when the depth measurements captured by the apparatus 103 contain a level of noise above a predefined threshold.
Having selected the minimum depth measurement for the current sweep angle at block 610, the selector is configured to add the selected depth measurement to the candidate set, along with an indication of the sweep angle corresponding to the minimum depth measurement (i.e., the angle selected at block 605). At block 615, the selector 204 is then configured to determine whether any sweep angles remain to be processed. When the determination is affirmative, the performance of the method 600 returns to block 605, and block 610 is repeated for the next sweep angle (e.g., −55 degrees as shown in
At block 655, the selector 204 is configured to subdivide the image containing depth measurements into a plurality of overlapping patches. For example, each patch may have dimensions of 3×3 pixels, and overlap adjacent patches by 2 pixels in the vertical and horizontal directions. That is, the patches are selected such that every pixel in the depth image is the center of one patch. In other examples, larger patch dimensions may also be employed (e.g. 5×5 pixels), with a greater degree of overlap to provide one patch centered on each pixel. In further examples, the overlap between patches may be reduced to reduce the computational burden imposed by the performance of the method 650, at the expense of reduced resolution of the candidate set, as will be evident below.
At block 655, having selected a patch (e.g. the upper-left patch of 3×3 pixels of the image 516-1 shown in
At block 660, the selector 204 is configured to determine whether the normal vector generated at block 655 has a predefined orientation. As noted earlier, when the data captured at block 305 is captured with the depth camera 504, the candidate set of measurements is selected based on an expected orientation to the depth sensor. The expected orientation of the shelf edge 118 relative to the depth sensor (e.g. the camera 504), as shown in
The selector 204 is therefore configured to perform the determination at block 660 by comparing the normal vector generated at block 655 to the predefined expected orientation. Referring again to
Returning to
Returning to
Referring to
At block 855, the guide generator 208 is configured to select a depth range. In the present example, the guide generator 208 is configured to assess depth ranges in a sequence beginning with a minimum depth (e.g. a depth of zero, indicating a search volume immediately adjacent to the depth sensor at the time of data capture), with each and increasing by predefined distances. Thus, for example, the depth ranges assessed may include a depth range of 0 to 0.2 m, 0.2 m to 0.4 m, 0.4 m to 0.6 m, and so on, until a predefined maximum depth (e.g., 2.0 m). Each depth range may contain a subset of the candidate set of pixels selected through the performance of the method 650. The guide generator 208 may also be configured to determine whether the selected depth range contains any candidate pixels, and when it does not, to immediately advance to the next depth range.
At block 860, the guide generator 208 is configured to fit a plane to the subset of candidate pixels contained within the current depth range. The subset includes any of the candidate pixels having depth measurements (e.g., along the Z axis) within the depth range, regardless of the position of such pixels in the image (e.g., the position on the X and Y axes). Turning to
The guide generator 208 is configured to fit a plane 1008 to the subset 1004 according to a suitable plane fitting operation. For example, a plane fitting operation may be selected for the performance of block 860 that maximizes the number of points in the subset 1004 that are intersected by the plane (i.e., that are inliers of the plane). As seen in
Returning to
When the determination at block 865 is negative, the plane generated at block 860 is discarded, and the guide generator 208 determines at block 870 whether any depth ranges remain to be assessed. When the determination at block 865 is affirmative, however, as in the case of the plane 1008 shown in
The guide generator 208 is then configured to determine, at block 870, whether any depth ranges remain to be assessed. In the present example performance, a second depth range remains to be assessed, as shown in
When all depth ranges have been assessed, a negative determination at block 870 leads the guide generator 208 to pass the current best plane (e.g. as a normal vector and a depth) to the output detector 212 for further processing at block 320 of the method 300.
Returning to
Turning to
At block 1160, the output detector 212 is configured to select local minima among the distances determined at block 1155. The local minima may be selected from a preconfigured range of sweep angles (e.g. one minimum distance may be selected among five consecutive distances). Turning to
Returning to
At block 1170, the output detector 212 is configured to determine whether any scans remain to be processed. When scans remain to be processed, the performance of blocks 1155-1165 is repeated for each remaining scan. When the determination at block 1170 is negative, the output detector 212 proceeds to block 1175. At block 1175, the output detector is configured to discard any local minimum distances that fail to meet a detection threshold. The detection threshold is a preconfigured number of scans in which a local minimum must be detected at the same sweep angle in order to be retained in the output set of depth measurements. For example, if the detection threshold is three, and local minima are selected for the sweep angle of −55 degrees for only two scans (i.e., the remaining scans do not exhibit local minima at −55 degrees), those local minima are discarded. Discarding local minima that do not meet the detection threshold may prevent the selection of depth measurements for the output set that correspond to measurement artifacts or structural anomalies in the shelf edges 118. In other examples, the performance of block 1175 may be omitted.
Following the performance of block 1175, or following the negative determination at block 1170 if block 1175 is omitted, the output detector 212 is configured to proceed to block 325.
At block 325, the output detector 212 is configured to store the output set of depth measurements. The output set of depth measurements are stored, for example in the repository in association with the captured data (e.g. the captured lidar scans 416 or depth images 516), and include at least identifications of the output set of depth measurements. Thus, for lidar data, the output set is stored as a set of sweep angle and line index coordinates corresponding to the local minima selected at block 1160 and retained through blocks 1165 and 1175. For depth image data, the output set is stored as pixel coordinates (e.g. X and Y coordinates) of the inlier pixels identified at block 1100. The output set, as stored in the memory 122, can be passed to further downstream functions of the server or retrieved by such functions.
In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.
The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5214615 | Bauer | May 1993 | A |
5408322 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414268 | McGee | May 1995 | A |
5534762 | Kim | Jul 1996 | A |
5566280 | Fukui et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5953055 | Huang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026376 | Kenney | Feb 2000 | A |
6034379 | Bunte et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6075905 | Herman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115114 | Berg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141293 | Amorai-Moriya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6304855 | Burke | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6442507 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6580441 | Schileru-Key | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6711293 | Lowe | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721769 | Rappaport et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6836567 | Silver et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7090135 | Patel | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137207 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7245558 | Willins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248754 | Cato | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7373722 | Cooper et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7474389 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487595 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493336 | Noonan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7527205 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7605817 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647752 | Magnell | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693757 | Zimmerman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7839531 | Sugiyama | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845560 | Emanuel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885865 | Benson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7925114 | Mai et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7957998 | Riley et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8009864 | Linaker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8049621 | Egan | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8091782 | Cato et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094902 | Crandall et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094937 | Teoh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8189855 | Opalach et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199977 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207964 | Meadow et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8233055 | Matsunaga et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8265895 | Willins et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8284988 | Sones et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8423431 | Rouaix et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429004 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479996 | Barkan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8520067 | Ersue | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8542252 | Perez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8599303 | Stettner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630924 | Groenevelt | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8660338 | Ma et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8743176 | Stettner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757479 | Clark et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812226 | Zeng | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8923893 | Austin et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8939369 | Olmstead et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954188 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971637 | Rivard | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8989342 | Liesenfelt et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9007601 | Steffey et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9064394 | Trundle | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9070285 | Ramu et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9129277 | MacIntosh | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9135491 | Morandi et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9159047 | Winkel | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9171442 | Clements | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9329269 | Zeng | May 2016 | B2 |
9349076 | Liu et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9367831 | Besehanic | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9380222 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396554 | Williams et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9400170 | Steffey | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9424482 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9549125 | Goyal et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9562971 | Shenkar et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9565400 | Curlander et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9600731 | Yasunaga et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600892 | Patel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9639935 | Douady-Pleven et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9697429 | Patel et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9778388 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9791862 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805240 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9811754 | Schwartz | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827683 | Hance et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9928708 | Lin et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10019803 | Venable et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10127438 | Fisher et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10229386 | Thomas | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10265871 | Hance et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20010041948 | Ross et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020006231 | Jayant et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020097439 | Braica | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020158453 | Levine | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164236 | Fukuhara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003925 | Suzuki | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030174891 | Wenzel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040131278 | Imagawa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040240754 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016004 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050114059 | Chang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213082 | DiBernardo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213109 | Schell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060032915 | Schwartz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045325 | Zavadsky et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106742 | Bochicchio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070074410 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272732 | Hindmon | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080025565 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080159634 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164310 | Dupuy et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175513 | Lai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181529 | Michel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080238919 | Pack | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294487 | Nasser | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090009123 | Skaff | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024353 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057411 | Madej et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090059270 | Opalach et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060349 | Linaker et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063306 | Fano et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063307 | Groenovelt et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074303 | Filimonova et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088975 | Sato et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103773 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125350 | Lessing et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125535 | Basso et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152391 | McWhirk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160975 | Kwan | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192921 | Hicks | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206161 | Olmstead | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236155 | Skaff | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252437 | Li et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323121 | Valkenburg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026804 | Tanizaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070365 | Siotia et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091094 | Sekowski | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118116 | Tomasz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131234 | Stewart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141806 | Uemura et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171826 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208039 | Setettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214873 | Somasundaram et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100295850 | Katz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100315412 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326939 | Clark et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047636 | Stachon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052043 | Hyung et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093306 | Nielsen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137527 | Simon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168774 | Magal | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172875 | Gibbs | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110216063 | Hayes | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242286 | Pace et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254840 | Halstead | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288816 | Thierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310088 | Adabala et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120019393 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022913 | Volkmann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120075342 | Choubassi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120169530 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179621 | Moir et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185112 | Sung et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201466 | Funayama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209553 | Doytchinov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236119 | Rhee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249802 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120250978 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269383 | Bobbitt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287249 | Choo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323620 | Hofman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030700 | Miller et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130119138 | Winkel | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132913 | Fu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130134178 | Lu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138246 | Gutmann et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142421 | Silver et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144565 | Miller | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154802 | O'Haire et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130156292 | Chang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162806 | Ding et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176398 | Bonner et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178227 | Vartanian et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182114 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226344 | Wong et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228620 | Ahem et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235165 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130236089 | Litvak et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278631 | Border et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299306 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130299313 | Baek, IV et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300729 | Grimaud | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130303193 | Dharwada et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321418 | Kirk | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341400 | Lancaster-Larocque | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002597 | Taguchi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003655 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003727 | Lortz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140016832 | Kong et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019311 | Tanaka | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028837 | Gao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047342 | Breternitz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049616 | Stettner | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052555 | MacIntosh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140086483 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098094 | Neumann et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140156133 | Cullinane et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192050 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195374 | Bassemir et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214547 | Signorelli et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140267614 | Ding et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267688 | Aich et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277691 | Jacobus et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277692 | Buzan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300637 | Fan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140344401 | Varney et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351073 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140369607 | Patel | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150015602 | Beaudoin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019391 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029339 | Kobres et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039458 | Reid | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150088618 | Basir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088703 | Yan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092066 | Geiss et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106403 | Haverinen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117788 | Patel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150154467 | Feng et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161793 | Takahashi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170256 | Pettyjohn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181198 | Baele et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150262116 | Katircioglu | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150298317 | Wang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150352721 | Wicks | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363625 | Wu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363758 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379704 | Chandrasekar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160026253 | Bradski et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160044862 | Kocer | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061591 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070981 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092943 | Vigier et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160012588 | Taguchi et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160104041 | Bowers et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107690 | Oyama et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112628 | Super et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160132815 | Itoko et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150217 | Popov | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156898 | Ren et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160163067 | Williams et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171707 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191759 | Somanath et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160253735 | Scudillo et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160328618 | Patel et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160353099 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004649 | Collet Romea et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011281 | Dijkman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011308 | Sun et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032311 | Rizzolo et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170041553 | Cao et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170066459 | Singh | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074659 | Giurgiu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170150129 | Pangrazio | May 2017 | A1 |
20170193434 | Shah et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219338 | Brown et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227645 | Swope et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227647 | Baik | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170228885 | Baumgartner | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170261993 | Venable et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280125 | Brown et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170286773 | Skaff et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170286901 | Skaff et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170323376 | Glaser et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180001481 | Shah et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005035 | Bogolea et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005176 | Williams et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020145 | Kotfis et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180053091 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053305 | Gu et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180101813 | Paat et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114183 | Howell | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180143003 | Clayton et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180174325 | Fu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180201423 | Drzewiecki et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204111 | Zadeh et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180293442 | Fridental et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180313956 | Rzeszutek et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314260 | Jen et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314908 | Lam | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315007 | Kingsford et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315065 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315173 | Phan et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315865 | Haist et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190057588 | Sawides et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065861 | Sawides et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190180150 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2835830 | Nov 2012 | CA |
3028156 | Jan 2018 | CA |
104200086 | Dec 2014 | CN |
107067382 | Aug 2017 | CN |
766098 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1311993 | May 2007 | EP |
2309378 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2439487 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2472475 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2562688 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2662831 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2693362 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2323238 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2330265 | Apr 1999 | GB |
101234798 | Jan 2009 | KR |
1020190031431 | Mar 2019 | KR |
2003002935 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003025805 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2006136958 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007042251 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008057504 | May 2008 | WO |
2008154611 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2012103199 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012103202 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012154801 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013165674 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014066422 | May 2014 | WO |
2014092552 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014181323 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015127503 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2018018007 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2019023249 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Richard O. Duda, et al., “Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures”, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, Graphics and Image Processing. Communications of the ACM, Jan. 1972, vol. 15, No. 1. |
N. Senthilkumaran, et al., “Edge Detection Techniques for Image Segmentation—A Survey of Soft Computing Approaches”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol. 1, No. 2, May 2009. |
Combined Search and Examination Report dated Mar. 11, 2015 in UK patent application GB1417218.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report,” dated Jan. 22, 2016 in connection with GB Patent Application No. 1521272.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Examination Report,” dated Jan. 22, 2016 in connection with GB Patent Application No. GB1417218.3. |
Rzeszutek, U.S. Appl. No. 15/698,340, filed Sep. 7, 2017. |
Szeliski, “Modified Hough Transform”, Computer Vision. Copyright 2011. pp. 251-254. Retrieved on Aug. 17, 2017. [http://szeliski.org/Book/drafts/SzeliskiBook_20100903_draft.pdf]. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report” for GB Patent Application No. 1813580.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030345 dated Sep. 17, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030360 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030363 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/025849 dated Jul. 9, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053212 dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/070996 dated Apr. 2, 2014. |
Jadhav et al. “Survey on Spatial Domain dynamic template matching technique for scanning linear barcode,” International Journal of scieve and research v 5 n. 3, Mar. 2016)(Year: 2016). |
Jian Fan et al: “Shelf detection via vanishing point and radial projection”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on image processing (ICIP), IEEE, (Oct. 27, 2014), pp. 1575-1578. |
Kang et al., “Kinematic Path-Tracking of Mobile Robot Using Iterative learning Control”, Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, pp. 111-121. |
Kay et al. “Ray Tracing Complex Scenes.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 20, No. 4, ACM, pp. 269-278, 1986. |
Kelly et al., “Reactive Nonholonomic Trajectory Generation via Parametric Optimal Control”, International Journal of Robotics Research, vot. 22, No. 7-8, pp. 583-601 (Jul. 30, 2013). |
Lari, Z., et al., “An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud.” International Archives of the Photogrammertry, Remote sensing and spatial information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, 2011, ISPRS Calgary 2011 Workshop, Aug. 29-31, 2011, Calgary, Canada. |
Lecking et al: “Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features”, IEEE, pp. 333-337 (Sep. 15, 2008). |
Lee et al. “Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 19, No. 3, ACM, pp. 61-67, 1985. |
Li et al., “An improved RANSAC for 3D Point cloud plane segmentation based on normal distribution transformation cells,” Remote sensing, V9: 433, pp. 1-16 (2017). |
Likhachev, Maxim, and Dave Ferguson. “Planning Long dynamically feasible maneuvers for autonomous vehicles.” The international journal of Robotics Reasearch 28.8 (2009): 933-945. (Year:2009). |
Marder-Eppstein et al., “The Office Marathon: robust navigation in an indoor office environment,” IEEE, 2010 International conference on robotics and automation, May 3-7, 2010, pp. 300-307. |
McNaughton, Matthew, et al. “Motion planning for autonomous driving with a conformal spatiotemporal lattice.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. (Year: 2011). |
Mitra et al., “Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data,” International Journal of Computational geometry & applications, Jun. 8-10, 2003, pp. 322-328. |
N.D.F. Campbell et al. “Automatic 3D Object Segmentation in Multiple Views using Volumetric Graph-Cuts”, Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 14-25. |
Ni et al., “Edge Detection and Feature Line Tracing in 3D-Point Clouds by Analyzing Geometric Properties of Neighborhoods,” Remote Sensing, V8 I9, pp. 1-20 (2016). |
Norrlof et al., “Experimental comparison of some classical iterative learning control algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 2002, pp. 636-641. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,175 dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,503 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,495 dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/518,091 dated Apr. 12, 2017. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,103 dated Apr. 5, 2017. |
Olson, Clark F., etal. “Wide-Baseline Stereo Vision for terrain Mapping” in Machine Vision and Applications, Aug. 2010. |
Oriolo et al., “An iterative learning controller for nonholonomic mobile Robots”, the international Journal of Robotics Research, Aug. 1997, pp. 954-970. |
Ostafew et al., “Visual Teach and Repeat, Repeat, Repeat: Iterative learning control to improve mobile robot path tracking in challenging outdoor environment”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and Systems, Nov. 2013, pp. 176-181. |
Park et al., “Autonomous mobile robot navigation using passive rfid in indoor environment,” IEEE, Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 56, issue 7, pp. 2366-2373 (Jul. 2009). |
Perveen et al. (An overview of template matching methodologies and its application, International Journal of Research in Computer and Communication Tenology, v2n10, Oct. 2013) (Year: 2013). |
Pivtoraiko et al., “Differentially constrained mobile robot motion planning in state lattices”, journal of field robotics, vol. 26, No. 3, 2009, pp. 308-333. |
Pratt W K Ed: “Digital Image processing, 10-image enhancement, 17-image segmentation”, Jan. 1, 2001, Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside, New York: John Wily & Sons, US, pp. 243-258, 551. |
Puwein, J., et al.“Robust Multi-view camera calibration for wide-baseline camera networks,” in IEEE Workshop on Applications of computer vision (WACV), Jan. 2011. |
Rusu, et al. “How to incrementally register pairs of clouds,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 22, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pairwise_incremental_registration.php]. |
Rusu, et al. “Spatial Change detection on unorganized point cloud data,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 19, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/octree_change.php]. |
Schnabel et al. “Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection”, vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-12 (1981). |
Tahir, Rabbani, et al., “Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint,” International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36.5 (Sep. 2006): 248-253. |
Trevor et al., “Tables, Counters, and Shelves: Semantic Mapping of Surfaces in 3D,” Retrieved from Internet Jul. 3, 2018 @ http://citeseerxist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.703.5365&rep=rep1&type=pdf, pp. 1-6. |
Tseng, et al., “A Cloud Removal Approach for Aerial Image Visualization”, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 2421-2440 (Jun. 2013). |
Uchiyarna, et al., “Removal of Moving Objects from a Street-View Image by Fusing Multiple Image Sequences”, Pattern Recognition, 2010, 20th International Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ pp. 3456-3459 (Aug. 23, 2010). |
Varol Gul et al: “Product placement detection based on image processing”, 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communication Applications Conference (SIU), IEEE, Apr. 23, 2014. |
Varol Gul et al: “Toward Retail product recognition on Grocery shelves”, Visual Communications and image processing; Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, (Mar. 4, 2015). |
Weber et al., “Methods for Feature Detection in Point clouds,” visualization of large and unstructured data sets—IRTG Workshop, pp. 90-99 (2010). |
Zhao Zhou et al.: “An Image contrast Enhancement Algorithm Using PLIP-based histogram Modification”, 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCON), IEEE, (Jun. 21, 2017). |
Ziang Xie et al., “Multimodal Blending for High-Accuracy Instance Recognition”, 2013 IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 2214-2221. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/025859 dated Jul. 3, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/024847 dated Jul. 7, 2017. |
“Fair Billing with Automatic Dimensioning” pp. 1-4, undated, Copyright Mettler-Toledo International Inc. |
“Plane Detection in Point Cloud Data” dated Jan. 25, 2010 by Michael Ying Yang and Wolfgang Forstner, Technical Report 1, 2010, University of Bonn. |
“Swift Dimension” Trademark Omniplanar, Copyright 2014. |
Ajmal S. Mian et al., “Three-Dimensional Model Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Cluttered Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006. |
Batalin et al., “Mobile robot navigation using a sensor network,” IEEE, International Conference on robotics and automation, Apr. 26, May 1, 2004, pp. 636-641. |
Bazazian et al., “Fast and Robust Edge Extraction in Unorganized Point clouds,” IEEE, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applicatoins (DICTA), Nov. 23-25, 2015, pp. 1-8. |
Biswas et al. “Depth Camera Based Indoor Mobile Robot Localization and Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2012. |
Bohm, Multi-Image Fusion for Occlusion-Free Façade Texturing, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 867-872 (Jan. 2004). |
Bristow et al., “A Survey of Iterative Learning Control”, IEEE Control Systems, Jun. 2006, pp. 96-114. |
Buenaposada et al. “Realtime tracking and estimation of plane pose” Proceedings of the ICPR (Aug. 2002) vol. II, IEEE pp. 697-700. |
Carreira et al., “Enhanced PCA-based localization using depth maps with missing data,” IEEE, pp. 1-8, Apr. 24, 2013. |
Chen et al. “Improving Octree-Based Occupancy Maps Using Environment Sparsity with Application to Aerial Robot Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, pp. 3656-3663, 2017. |
Cleveland Jonas et al: “Automated System for Semantic Object Labeling with Soft-Object Recognition and Dynamic Programming Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY (Apr. 1, 2017). |
Cook et al., “Distributed Ray Tracing” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 18, No. 3, ACM pp. 137-145, 1984. |
Datta, A., et al. “Accurate camera calibration using iterative refinement of control points,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009. |
Deschaud, et al., “A Fast and Accurate Place Detection algoritm for large noisy point clouds using filtered normals and voxel growing,” 3DPVT, May 2010, Paris, France. [hal-01097361]. |
Douillard, Bertrand, et al. “On the segmentation of 3D LIDAR point clouds.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2011. |
Dubois, M., et al., A comparison of geometric and energy-based point cloud semantic segmentation methods, European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), p. 88-93, 25-27, Sep. 2013. |
F.C.A. Groen et al., “The smallest box around a package,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 14, No. 1-6, Jan. 1, 1981, pp. 173-176, XP055237156, GB, ISSN: 0031-3203, DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(81(90059-5 p. 176-p. 178. |
Federico Tombari et al. “Multimodal cue integration through Hypotheses Verification for RGB-D object recognition and 6DOF pose estimation”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jan. 2013. |
Flores, et al., “Removing Pedestrians from Google Street View Images”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, IEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 53-58 (Jun. 13, 2010). |
Glassner, “Space Subdivision for Fast Ray Tracing.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4.10, pp. 15-24, 1984. |
Golovinskiy, Aleksey, et al. “Min-Cut based segmentation of point clouds.” Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2009. |
Hackel et al., “Contour Detection in unstructured 3D point clouds,”IEEE, 2016 Conference on Computer vision and Pattern recognition (CVPR), Jun. 27-30, 2016, pp. 1-9. |
Hao et al., “Structure-based object detection from scene point clouds,” Science Direct, v191, pp. 148-160 (2016). |
Hu et al., “An improved method of discrete point cloud filtering based on complex environment,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, v48, i18 (2013). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/064110 dated Mar. 20, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190073554 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |