The media or broadcast industry has traditionally been confined to technologies that are expensive and an inflexible with respect to editing, production and delivery of media (e.g., video). By contrast, the communications affords great flexibility in terms of providing users with alternative networks and rich communication and entertainment services. In addition, the cost of equipment, from networking elements to end user equipment, follows a downward trend as advancements are made; for example, cellular phones are ubiquitous because of their affordability. The capabilities of these devices continue to evolve at a rapid pace; e.g., cellular phones are now equipped with high resolution displays and advanced processors to support sophisticated applications and services. Further, broadband data communications services have enabled transmission of bandwidth intensive applications, such as video broadcasts (e.g., web casts). In adopting these advances in communication technologies, the media industry faces a number of challenges. For instance, the issue of convergence of a broadband rich media experience and live television production and delivery needs to be addressed. Also, the demands of supporting real-time news, video on demand, user personalization, and continuing creative additions to initial systems pose additional engineering challenges. Further, delivery of interactive media (which describe real events in the real world in real-time) requires the capability to quickly acquire, store, edit, and composite live and other descriptive media by numerous users, e.g., editors, artists, and producers. Given this backdrop, one area of interest concerns providing a collaborative environment across a diversity of communication equipment and services. Traditionally, no mechanism exists for permitting manipulation of interactive media, such as video, in a collaborative fashion, largely because conventional systems have not permitted the distribution of video over different devices and media. Further, under such circumstances, synchronization of the video frames is difficult.
Based on the foregoing, there is a clear need for approaches that enable effective collaboration.
Various exemplary embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
An apparatus, method, and software for providing frame synchronization are described. In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various exemplary embodiments. It is apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the various exemplary embodiments may be practiced without these specific details or with an equivalent arrangement. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the exemplary embodiments.
Although the various embodiments of the present invention are described with respect to the Motion Picture Expert Group (MPEG) standards, MICROSOFT Windows Media, and Group of Pictures (GOP) technologies, it is contemplated that these embodiments have applicability to other equivalent video encoding standards and technologies.
The media services platform 101 enables multi-channel distribution of digital content to any variety and number of devices and networks—e.g., wireless mobile devices, broadband, Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), and traditional TV platforms—thereby, reducing costs and increasing revenue over conventional systems. The architecture of the media services platform 101, according to an exemplary embodiment, supports compact to enterprise-scale deployments, and ensures that storage and processing capabilities are robust and scalable, suitable for mission-critical broadcast operations. As will be more fully described, numerous video proxies can be generated and syndicated to multiple applications and/or devices in a collaborative environment. This capability to collaborate is enabled through a frame synchronizer 103, which ensures that the video proxies are aligned during a collaboration session. This process is more fully described with respect to
It is recognized that there is an increasing need for professional, cost-effective editing of video feeds, such as television coverage of news or entertainment events, wherein the edited files can be provided over different alternative networks. For example, a user of a video enabled mobile cellular telephone might subscribe to a service that provides highlights of selected sporting events. Similarly, a user might subscribe to a sports headlines service, and receive files on a computer connected to a public data network, such as the global Internet. The real time delivery of events such as sports footage, interviews and edited highlights presents problems in such contexts, where it is necessary to produce compressed files to reduce the bandwidth for transmission over a cellular telephone network or a data network. Video files for such purposes need to be produced in an encoded format using, for instance, Group of Picture (GOP) technology, otherwise the raw digital stream would render timely transmissions and file storage impractical.
Thus, a video stream is created to include a sequence of sets of frames (i.e., GOP). By way of example, each group, typically 8 to 24 frames long, has only one complete frame represented in full. This complete frame is compressed using only intraframe compression, and thus is denoted as an I frame. Other frames are utilized and include temporally-compressed frames, representing only change data with respect to the complete frame. Specifically, during encoding, motion prediction techniques compare neighboring frames and pinpoint areas of movement, defining vectors for how each will move from one frame to the next. By recording only these vectors, the data which needs to be recorded can be substantially reduced. Predictive (P) frames refer to the previous frame, while Bi-directional (B) frames rely on previous and subsequent frames. This combination of compression techniques is highly effective in reducing the size of the video stream.
With GOP systems, an index is required to decode a given frame. Conventionally, the index is only written at the end of the file once the file has completed the encoding process. As a result, no index is available until the recording is completed. The implication is that the production of an edited version of the file, for example to transmit as highlights over a cellular phone network, cannot commence until the recording is completed and this index file produced. The media services platform 101 addresses this drawback by creating a separate index file, which can be supplemental to the routinely generated index file, during the recording and encoding process.
Accordingly, the platform 101, in an exemplary embodiment, can provide remote editing over any data network (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP)-based) that can support connectivity to the proxy editor server 102, whereby editing can commence without having to wait for completion of the recording. The proxy editor application resident on the server 102 enables developers to build professional-level desktop video editing applications using, for example, the Microsoft Windows Media Series platform.
The platform 101 also provides significant scalability due to decoupled storage. Conventional editing systems required direct disk access to the video file. This poses a severe scalability issue, as every editing function (e.g., play, scrub, etc.) from the editing client creates disk traffic. If the storage cannot timely respond, a conventional editing application often freezes or crashes, such a scenario is unacceptable for real time feeds. With the media services platform 101, the content is downloaded once on each client cache; thus, the centralized storage requirements are reduced by a very significant factor (depending on editing type).
As seen in
The media services platform 101 includes a workflow system 113, which comprises a workflow engine 115 and one or more resource servers 117 to support editing and distribution of digital media. The automated workflow provides the ability to automate and orchestrate repetitive workflows. In particular, the workflow system 113 offers users an overview of their work and associated events; that is, the system 113 supports an application that shows the status and progress of each job and links to relevant applications that enable the users to perform their tasks and advance the project towards completion. The workflow engine 115 controls workflow jobs and dispatches them to the resource servers 117. Communication among the resource servers 117 is facilitated by, for example, Microsoft Message Queuing.
In addition to providing individual users a central point for managing their work, the workflow system 113 is also useful as a monitoring system. For example, the system 113 can support a graphical user interface (GUI) on the user side, such that users can quickly determine through visual indicators whether tasks have been completed or error conditions exist. The users (e.g., administrators) can “drill down” to view more detail. Also, jobs can be paused, restarted (from any stage), aborted and deleted from the workflow application. This capability provides users with full control over the priority of the jobs. Additionally, the system 113 can record timing information for every step of a task, thereby enabling generation of reports on delivery turnaround etc.—e.g., for Service Level Agreement (SLA) reporting.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the media services platform 101 can be implemented with a pre-configured, standard set of common workflows. For instance, these workflows can support generic delivery of files, rendering of edits and delivery of content from the video server 105. Moreover, customizable workflows are supported, wherein the users can integrate new services.
As shown, the media services platform 101 comprises core servers, such as an object store 119, a media server 121, and an application server 123. In an exemplary embodiment, the object store 119 contains configuration information for the workflow system 113. Configuration information include, in an exemplary embodiment, parameters of every service, the capabilities of every resource server 117, the definition of workflows, and the real time status of every job. The object store 119 supports the various applications that interface with it through an object store Application Program Interface (API). According to an exemplary embodiment, the object store 119 has an object-based database schema (e.g., Microsoft SQL (Structured Query Language) Server, for example. The media server 121 receives stream broadcasts and serves the stream on to individual user workstations using, for example, Microsoft Windows Media. The stream contains, for example, Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) timecode, enabling the stream to be used as a frame-accurate source for live logging.
The application server 123 provides dynamic web site creation and administration functions, such as a search engine, and database capabilities. In an exemplary embodiment, the application server 123 executes Microsoft Internet Information Server (IIS), and can be configured for high availability and load-balancing based on industry standard components.
The media server 121 and the application server 123 interface with the data network 125, which can be a corporate network or the Internet. The application server 123 is thus accessible by a workstation 127, which can be any type of computing device—e.g., laptop, web appliance, palm computer, personal digital assistant (PDA), etc. The workstation 127 can utilize a browser (e.g., web-based), generally, to communicate with the media services platform 101, and a downloadable applet (e.g., ActiveX controls) to support distributed video editing functionality. The browser in conjunction with the applet is referred to an editing (or editor) interface—e.g., the proxy editor player 128. The workstation 127 can also be equipped with voiceover microphone and headphones to facilitate the editing process. The proxy editor player 128 communicates with the proxy editor server 102 to enable the viewing and editing of content, including live video, remotely. Editing functionalities include immediate access to frame-accurate content, even while being recorded, full audio and video scrubbing of source clips and edit timelines over the network 125, and generation of Advanced Authoring Format/Edit Decision List (AAF/EDL) files for craft edit integration.
To connect to the media services platform 101, the workstation 127 need not require special hardware or software. As mentioned, the workstation 127 need only be configured to run a browser application, e.g., Internet Explorer, for communication over the data network 125. With this user interface, changes or upgrades to the workstation 127 are not required, as all the applications are hosted centrally at the platform 101.
In addition to the video server 105 within the media services platform 101, a remote video server 129 can be deployed to ingest content for uploading to the platform 101 via the data network 125. The video servers 105, 129 include, in an exemplary embodiment, a longitudinal timecode (LTC) reader card as well as other video interfaces (e.g., RS-422 control card, Windows Media Encoder and Matrox DigiServer video card). Video editing relies on the use of timecodes to ensure precise edits, capturing all in “in points” and “out points” of the edits. An edited video can be characterized by an edit decision list (EDL), which enumerates all the edits used to produce the edited video. LTC timecodes are recorded as a longitudinal track, analogous to audio tracks. With LTC, each frame time is divided into 80 bit cells. LTC timecodes are transmitted serially in four-bit nibbles, using Manchester codes.
The video servers 105, 129 can be remotely controlled by the workstation 127. Also, these servers 105, 129 can connect to the shared SAN 104 via Fibre Channel and a file system by, e.g., ADIC™.
A syndication (or distribution) function 131 can then distribute content over various channels, such as a wireless network 133 (e.g., cellular, wireless local area network (WLAN)), a television network 135, and a broadband Internet Service Provider (ISP) network 137. Depending on the capabilities supported by the wireless or wired access network (e.g., networks 133 and 137), rich services, such as presence, events, instant messaging (IM), voice telephony, video, games and entertainment services can be supported.
The syndication function 131 automates the creation and delivery of content and metadata to very specific standards for a range of target systems without manual intervention. Additionally, the syndication function 131 can operate in conjunction with a collaboration service for delivery of the information to the GUI of
Although the video server 105, the workflow engine 115, the object store 119, the media server 121, and the application server 123 are shown as separate components, it is recognized that the functions of these servers can be combined in a variety of ways within one or more physical component. For example, the object store 119, the application server 123, and the workflow engine 115 can reside within a single server; and the video server 105 and the media server 121 can be combined into a common server.
As mentioned above, the media services platform 101 enables media asset management, rapid production, and robust, cost-effective proxy editing capabilities. By way of illustration, management of media assets to support broadband video on demand (VOD) is described. One of the first tasks involved with VOD applications is ingesting fall length movies into the video servers 105 for mastering and editing (e.g., removing black, stitching tapes together, adding legal notices etc). The masters are then stored on the shared SAN 104. The content is then transcoded to a high quality media stream format, such as Microsoft Windows Media Series, and delivered automatically with metadata to their broadband video pay-per-view portal (e.g., any one or more of the networks 133, 135 and 137).
Additionally, the media services platform 101 can offer video archiving services. For instance, customers can extend their online storage with nearline tape and manage content seamlessly across multiple storage devices using add-on archive modules. Online storage can be backed up and/or migrated to tape according to automated policies. Advantageously, this archival approach can be transparent to the users; that is, the users are never aware that the master video is no longer stored on expensive disk-based storage. In an embodiment, a library application can be implemented with the media services platform 104 to provide seamless integration with offline video and data tape archives. Further, the media services platform 101 provides high integration with existing production workflows through its capability to transcode and deliver any content contained in the archive to, for example, popular non-linear editors (e.g., AVID™ editor).
Furthermore, the media services platform 101 enables flexible, cost-effective content aggregation and distribution, which is suitable for content service providers. Typical workflows involve aggregation of content from owners in such formats as Motion Pictures Expert Group (MPEG)-2 or Windows Media, along with metadata in eXtensible Markup Language (XML) files, using pre-configured File Transfer Protocol (FTP) hot folders. “Hot folders” are predefined folders that trigger a workflow event (e.g., file conversion, compression, file transfer, etc.) upon movement of files into the folder. These owners can submit content directly to the workflow system 113 for automatic transcoding, Digital Rights Management (DRM) protection and syndication to multi-channel operators.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the media services platform 101 utilizes a unified user interface (e.g., web browser) for accessing applications supported by the platform 101. It is recognized that typical production and content delivery workflows often involve the use of multiple separate applications: one application for logging, a second application for encoding, a third one for editing, a fourth application for asset management, and so on. Consequently, the challenge of effectively managing workflows is difficult. The task is even more daunting in a multi-channel production and distribution environment, as greater elements need to coordinated and more applications have to be learned over traditional television environments.
The media services platform 101 advantageously simplifies this task by permitting access to the multitude of applications via a single unified user interface as part of a coherent workflow. In this manner, although various technologies are involved, the user experience is that of a single, user-friendly suite of tools, which shield non-technical users from the complex integration of applications and technologies.
The applications supported by the platform 101 include the following: media asset management and search, video editing, video server services, workflow, syndication, upload of media, library service, administration, quality assurance, copyright protection, music cue sheet services, and reporting. In addition, the users can develop their own applications within the unified user interface. Asset management permits users to manage the location of content within organized folder structures and categories. The asset search function offers a generic search capability across the entire object store 119.
The media services platform 101 also provides a flexible and cost-effective approach for proxy logging and editing of live and archive material. Such editing services can be in support of news and sport editing, archive browsing and editing, mobile, broadband and IPTV production and mastering, and promotion production. The editing application provides viewing and logging of live feeds, frame-accurate proxy logging and editing, and remote proxy editing (e.g., utilizing Windows Media Series proxy format). In addition, the editing application can support instant logging and editing while the feed is recording, as well as audio and video scrubbing. This editing application includes the following capabilities: edit timeline with effects; voiceover (while editing remotely—which is ideal for translation workflows); save edit projects with versions; generate thumbnail and metadata from within the editing user interface; and export EDL's or render finished edits ready for transcoding and delivery. With this application, a user, through an inexpensive workstation 127, can efficiently master a movie for VOD distribution, rough-cut a documentary, or create a filly-finished sports highlight video with voiceover and effects.
The media services platform 101, in an exemplary embodiment, utilizes a Windows Media Series codec, which allows high quality video (e.g., DVD-quality) to be logged and edited across the data network 125. Further, the platform 101 employs intelligent caching to ensure that the applications are as responsive as editing on a local hard drive, even over low-bandwidth connections.
The upload application allows users to ingest digital files into the media services platform 101 and submit them to any permitted workflow. The users (with administrative responsibilities) can control which file types are allowed, which workflows are compatible, and the way in which different types of content are processed. The upload application can facilitate submission of the files to automatic workflows for hands-off end-to-end processing as well as to manual workflows that require manual intervention.
The upload application is complemented by a hot folder system, wherein workflow activities are automatically initiated upon movement of files into and out of the hot folders. The file system folders can be pre-configured to behave like the upload application and pass files of particular types to the workflows. Metadata for each asset provided in accompanying XML files can be acquired and mapped directly into the object store 119.
The reporting application enables users to create “printer-friendly” reports on any information stored in the object store 119. The reporting application is pre-configured with a number of default reports for reporting on content delivery. Users can filter each report by selecting a desired property of the data, e.g., subscription name, or start and end date. Through the API of the media services platform 101, users (and system integrators) can create new report templates and queries.
The library application offers the ability to manage physical media that contain instances of assets managed in the media services platform 101. Even with continuing expansion in the use of digital media, traditional media continue to play an important role. Typical production environments possess a number of video tapes, DVDs or other physical media for storing content and data. Some environments utilize large established archives.
In mixed media environments, it is beneficial to manage digital and physical instances of content in an integrated manner. Accordingly, the library application provides the following capabilities. For example, the application permits the user to generate and print barcodes for the physical media and shelves, with automatic naming as well as bulk naming (with configurable naming conventions). Also, barcodes are employed for common actions, thereby allowing completely keyboard-free operation for checking in/out and shelving of the physical media. The library application additionally can manage items across multiple physical locations, e.g., local and master libraries. Further, the application supports PDA-based applications with a barcode scanner for mobile checking in/out and shelving. The library application advantageously simplifies management of multiple copies of the same asset on several physical media and storage of multiple assets on the same tape or DVD. The library application can further be used in conjunction with robotic tape libraries to track tapes that have been removed and shelved.
Moreover, the media services platform 101 provides an administration function to tailor system configuration for different customers. It is recognized that a “one size fits all” configuration for all users is non-existent. That is, each user, department, organization and customer has its own set of requirements. Therefore, the media services platform 101 supports concurrent use of multiple configurations. For example, each deployment can configure to its own user groups, create new workflows, integrate new services, support new content types, and specify new output media formats. The customer can also change and add metadata structures and fields, and integrate existing web-based applications into the user interface. The above capabilities can be executed, via the administration application, with immediate effect without shutting down the platform 101. Additionally, in a multi-department deployment scenario, multiple logical instances of the media services platform 101 can be configured with their own unique configurations.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the media services platform 101 can be implemented as a turn-key system within a single box—e.g., in-a-box flight case. Under this configuration, there is no need for a costly and time-consuming IT (information technology) integration undertaking to rack the components or integrate them into the customer's network. Under this arrangement, the platform 101 is be configured as a plug-and-play system, connecting to the network automatically.
The media is then edited, per step 203. By way of example, the user, utilizing the proxy editor player 128 (which is the counterpart software to the proxy editor supported by the media services platform 101) on the workstation 127, can select and log the feed (assuming a live feed which is always visible), either marking in and out points manually or using an auto-clip feature for rapid logging. The user can also insert commentary and assign a rating to the video for determining which segment of the content is the most compelling content, thereby providing an indication of the selected clips that should be edited. During or after logging, the user can select clips from the log and use the proxy editor player to trim the selection. For example, the user can jog and shuttle along a timeline, or utilize a mouse wheel to scroll frame by frame to the desired cut point. The user can then preview the selection before placing it on the edit timeline. Thereafter, the user can manipulate the clips on the timeline, reorder and trim the selections. The proxy editor player 128 can permit the user to apply zoom and crop effects to close in on areas of interest; this capability is particularly valuable for broadband or mobile outputs where detail is important. The user can record a voiceover directly onto the timeline, thereby completing the edit.
The edit is then rendered, as in step 205, as part of a workflow. In an exemplary embodiment, the edit is rendered using a high-resolution MPEG-2 master. Alternatively, an associated EDL is delivered to an integrated craft edit for completion. The media services platform 101 can support various workflows for craft editor integration, such as, store and forward, and instant editing. As for the store and forward approach, the content can be viewed, logged and edited using the proxy editor into packages for automated transcoding (from master MPEG-2) and delivery to popular non-linear editing systems (e.g., AVID Unity and AVID Media Composer, Adobe Premiere, Apple Final Cut Pro, Media 100, iFinish, Pinnacle Liquid and Vortex). With respect to instant editing, using the proxy editor player 128, the user can execute an ingest of a live feed, which can be viewed, logged and edited. The user can then export an EDL to a craft editor, which can be a third party craft editor (e.g., Incite Editor E3) that is integrated with the media services platform 101. When imported into Incite, the timeline is rebuilt frame-accurately, pointing to the MPEG-2 master on the shared SAN 104. Once the edit is complete, the craft editor creates a new MPEG-2 digital master, which is automatically re-ingested back into the platform 101 when dropped in an appropriate Hot Folder.
It is noted that the above process can occur while the video feeds are still being recorded, thus enabling the quickest possible turnaround of content for broadcast programs (e.g., sports and news).
In step 207, metadata is added. The file is transcoded (per step 209) and reviewed and/or approved (step 211). Thereafter, the edited filed is delivered, per step 213. The last stage in the workflow is the delivery of content files and metadata to other systems (e.g., networks 133, 135, and 137) that are responsible for delivery of content to consumers. The syndication application of the media services platform 101 provides the automated delivery of the content and metadata. The media services platform 101 operates on a “set it and forget it” principle. In other words, once a configuration is specified, no other input is required thereafter. For instance, a configuration of a new subscription is set to the required content categories, the technology used to create each file as well as the specific set of parameters are specified, and the file-naming conventions and delivery details are indicated. Every subsequent delivery from the workflow application simply implements the subscription when the correct criteria are met. Whenever the user requires a new output format, the user can specify the various configuration parameters, including the codec, frame rate, frame size, bit rate, and encoder complexity.
It is noted that any technology plugged into the workflow system 113 can be automated—e.g., for pre-processing, transcoding, DRM protection, watermarking, delivery, or any other purpose required.
The above workflow process can be illustrated in the following example involving a sports production. Under this scenario, a customer produces, on a weekly basis for instance, multiple fully-edited football match highlights every week for mobile operators (utilizing Third Generation/Universal Mobile Telecommnunications System (3G/UMTS) technologies). The customer requires a two minute voiced highlight package be delivered to the operators within 4 minutes of the end of each game for these concurrent matches. This requirement can be achieved with the media services platform 101, whereby live broadcast feeds are recorded using the video servers 105. Producers edit and log the media using the proxy editor application (e.g., player 128) during recording of the matches. Once the matches are over, they simply select a deliver button presented by the proxy editor player 128. The workflow system 113 automatically renders the proxy edit using, for instance, a MPEG-2 50 Mbps I-frame master, before automatically transcoding the edit into the mobile formats requested by the operators and delivering the content and metadata XML to their content distribution networks. In this manner, the mobile subscribers can purchase and view the video clips on their mobile handsets within minutes of the end of each game.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the media services platform 101 can be integrated with a newsroom computer system and playout video server. The video server 105 ingests content from live feeds or tape, and journalists and producers throughout the news organization can instantly start to log and edit the live feeds from their desktop using the proxy editor player 128. Finished edits are rendered and transcoded direct from the proxy editor application to a gallery playout video server. Notification is automatically sent to the newsroom computer system and automation system when every new package is available.
In an embodiment, the video server 105 includes a live media stream module 301, a media proxy file module 303, and a video format module 305. The live media stream module 301 communicates with the user interface 313 to provide logging and monitoring functions. The media proxy file module 303 supports the capability to perform editing functions during recording of the video. The video format module 305 converts a raw video stream into a standardized format—MPEG-2, for example. The modules 303 and 305 interface the repository 104 to store the ingested contents.
As shown, the server 105 can support various input sources: an LTC time code source 307, a Serial Digital Interface (SDI) source 309, and a VDCP slave source 311. The video server 105 can generate multiple outputs in real-time from the SDI source 307, in contrast to conventional video servers which generate only a single output. The modules 301, 303, 305 generate three types of outputs. One output is that of MPEG-2, in which the user can select between long-GOP and I-frame for each server, ranging from DVD-quality 5 Mbps long-GOP to 50 Mpbs I-frame only. The audio is captured at 48 kHz, for instance. The live media stream module 301 can generate a live media stream (e.g., Windows Media Series) for broadcast over a network (e.g., networks 133-137 of
Finally, the media proxy file module 303 can produce a file (e.g., Windows Media proxy file) for storage in the SAN 104. The proxy editor permits this file, according to an embodiment, to be opened for viewing and editing while the file is still being written. Thus, in conjunction with the proxy editor, the video server 105 supports fast-turnaround production of live events without the need for dedicated high-bandwidth networks and expensive edit suites, and without sacrificing quality or functionality.
In addition to the robust video editing functionality, the media services platform 101 provides a collaborative environment whereby frame synchronization of proxies is maintained across multiple formats, as next explained.
The above arrangement provides a foundation for collaboration among different applications resident on different devices (e.g., a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), or a combination thereof), as next described.
The update process for distributing the frame information can be a broadcast or multicast message to the clients 603. Alternatively, the frame information can be unicast to the appropriate clients 603.
Furthermore, a session controller 609 manages video sessions to permit mid-stream device changes, whereby a user can view video content and during the viewing session change to another client (or device). The session controller 609 can obtain information on “presence” of the clients 603. The session controller 609, in conjunction with the frame synchronizer 601, preserves the continuity of the playback in a seamless fashion. This process is detailed later with respect to
Upon receipt of the token, the user becomes the controller of the collaborative session, such that the video proxy of this user is the lead for frame synchronization purposes. Thus, in step 705, the frame information of the lead user is stored. The frame information is then transmitted to the other applications for frame synchronization, as in steps 707 and 709.
In addition, the GUI 800 provides for a user to initiate an instant communication session (e.g., Instant Messaging (IM)) with other participants of the session using an IM session box 811. Furthermore, it is contemplated that the user may wish to take notes about the video; this can be accomplished using text box 813 (“My Notes” section). The user may also view the notes from other users with text box 815 (“Other Notes” section).
It is recognized that any variation of the above sections within the GUI 800 can be used to tailor the interface for the particular application and/or device.
In an exemplary embodiment, this process also allows the user to use one device as a “master,” whereby other users can participate in a collaborative session. The master device can serve as an editor; the session can be displayed on the other devices as a “viewer.” For instance, the user may initiate a collaborative session on a mobile phone and move the session from the mobile phone to a desktop or vice versa. In this transfer, the user can choose to transfer the session at an exact point (or frame) from the original device for precise continuity.
The above described processes relating to frame synchronization and collaboration may be implemented via software, hardware (e.g., general processor, Digital Signal Processing (DSP) chip, an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), etc.), firmware or a combination thereof. Such exemplary hardware for performing the described functions is detailed below.
The computer system 1100 may be coupled via the bus 1101 to a display 1111, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), liquid crystal display, active matrix display, or plasma display, for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 1113, such as a keyboard including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to the bus 1101 for communicating information and command selections to the processor 1103. Another type of user input device is a cursor control 1115, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys, for communicating direction information and command selections to the processor 1103 and for controlling cursor movement on the display 1111.
According to an exemplary embodiment the processes described herein are performed by the computer system 1100, in response to the processor 1103 executing an arrangement of instructions contained in main memory 1105. Such instructions can be read into main memory 1105 from another computer-readable medium, such as the storage device 1109. Execution of the arrangement of instructions contained in main memory 1105 causes the processor 1103 to perform the process steps described herein. One or more processors in a multi-processing arrangement may also be employed to execute the instructions contained in main memory 1105. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the exemplary embodiment. Thus, exemplary embodiments are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
The computer system 1100 also includes a communication interface 1117 coupled to bus 1101. The communication interface 1117 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 1119 connected to a local network 1121. For example, the communication interface 1117 may be a digital subscriber line (DSL) card or modem, an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, a cable modem, a telephone modem, or any other communication interface to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of communication line. As another example, communication interface 1117 may be a local area network (LAN) card (e.g. for Ethernet™ or an Asynchronous Transfer Model (ATM) network) to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links can also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 1117 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic, or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information. Further, the communication interface 1117 can include peripheral interface devices, such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface, a PCMCIA (Personal Computer Memory Card International Association) interface, etc. Although a single communication interface 1117 is depicted in
The network link 1119 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, the network link 1119 may provide a connection through local network 1121 to a host computer 1123, which has connectivity to a network 1125 (e.g. a wide area network (WAN) or the global packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet”) or to data equipment operated by a service provider. The local network 1121 and the network 1125 both use electrical, electromagnetic, or optical signals to convey information and instructions. The signals through the various networks and the signals on the network link 1119 and through the communication interface 1117, which communicate digital data with the computer system 1100, are exemplary forms of carrier waves bearing the information and instructions.
The computer system 1100 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), the network link 1119, and the communication interface 1117. In the Internet example, a server (not shown) might transmit requested code belonging to an application program for implementing an exemplary embodiment through the network 1125, the local network 1121 and the communication interface 1117. The processor 1103 may execute the transmitted code while being received and/or store the code in the storage device 1109, or other non-volatile storage for later execution. In this manner, the computer system 1100 may obtain application code in the form of a carrier wave.
The term “computer-readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to the processor 1103 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as the storage device 1109. Volatile media include dynamic memory, such as main memory 1105. Transmission media include coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise the bus 1101. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic, optical, or electromagnetic waves, such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, CDRW, DVD, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, optical mark sheets, any other physical medium with patterns of holes or other optically recognizable indicia, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Various forms of computer-readable media may be involved in providing instructions to a processor for execution. For example, the instructions for carrying out at least part of various embodiments may initially be borne on a magnetic disk of a remote computer. In such a scenario, the remote computer loads the instructions into main memory and sends the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem of a local computer system receives the data on the telephone line and uses an infrared transmitter to convert the data to an infrared signal and transmit the infrared signal to a portable computing device, such as a personal digital assistant (PDA) or a laptop. An infrared detector on the portable computing device receives the information and instructions borne by the infrared signal and places the data on a bus. The bus conveys the data to main memory, from which a processor retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory can optionally be stored on storage device either before or after execution by processor.
In the preceding specification, various preferred embodiments have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that flow. The specification and the drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
The following patent applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties: co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/617,355 filed Dec. 29, 2006, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing On-Demand Resource Allocation”; co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/617,314 filed Dec. 29, 2006, entitled “Method and System for Providing Remote Workflow Management”; and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/614,400 filed Dec. 29, 2006, entitled “Method and System for Video Monitoring.”
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application (Ser. No. 11/368,750;), filed Mar. 6, 2006, entitled “Method and System for Providing Distributed Editing and Storage of Digital Media over a Network,” which claims the benefit of the earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application (Ser. No. 60/714,674;), filed Sep. 7, 2005, entitled “Method and System for Supporting Media Services”; the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5303367 | Leenstra et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5313630 | Namioka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5499371 | Henninger et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5557790 | Bingham et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5611076 | Durflinger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612715 | Karaki et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5729730 | Wlaschin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5790176 | Craig | Aug 1998 | A |
5799310 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5831669 | Adrain | Nov 1998 | A |
5845073 | Carlin et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852435 | Vigneaux et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864870 | Guck | Jan 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5930446 | Kanda | Jul 1999 | A |
5956424 | Wootton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980044 | Cannon et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026408 | Srinivasan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047291 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069627 | Conrad et al. | May 2000 | A |
6092154 | Curtis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6151622 | Fraenkel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6211869 | Loveman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222549 | Hoddie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226038 | Frink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246803 | Gauch | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263313 | Milsted et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6330572 | Sitka | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6404446 | Bates et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405198 | Bitar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411770 | Ito et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522418 | Yokomizo et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6573907 | Madrane | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6643659 | MacIssac et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658568 | Ginter et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678002 | Frink et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714594 | Dimitrova et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721490 | Yao et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728727 | Komine et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732183 | Graham | May 2004 | B1 |
6795506 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6865540 | Faber et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870887 | Kauffman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6917979 | Dutra et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6934339 | Kato | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947959 | Gill | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961445 | Jensen et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970510 | Wee et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7168086 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7177520 | Zetts | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7310111 | Ramirez-Diaz et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7409144 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7505604 | Zakrzewski et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522163 | Holmes | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7577959 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7629995 | Salivar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650625 | Watkins | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676820 | Snijder et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7782365 | Levien et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783154 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7902978 | Pederson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7952609 | Simerly et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8135852 | Nilsson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010034250 | Chadha | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010051927 | London et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020035732 | Zetts | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046292 | Tennison et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052771 | Bacon et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020056123 | Liwerant et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069218 | Sull et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020108115 | Palmer | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122659 | McGrath et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020145622 | Kauffman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194253 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001885 | Lin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005034 | Amin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018978 | Singal et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025599 | Monroe | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030044162 | Angel | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084451 | Pierzga et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088877 | Loveman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030135464 | Mourad et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030188019 | Wesley | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040017471 | Suga et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059996 | Fasciano | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040098754 | Vella et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040131330 | Wilkins et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133467 | Siler | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136590 | Brouwer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153504 | Hutchinson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168184 | Steenkamp et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040210823 | Miura et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216173 | Horoszowski et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223606 | Enete et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040247284 | Yamasaki | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255329 | Compton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268222 | Kawa et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268224 | Balkus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005000 | Yoshimoto | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019005 | Kim et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049886 | Grannan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073585 | Ettinger et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050074100 | Lederman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091311 | Lund et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149940 | Calinescu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050185634 | Benco et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195823 | Chen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198125 | Macleod Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210520 | Horvitz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262535 | Uchida et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262542 | Deweese et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278425 | Wilsher et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060047749 | Davis et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056732 | Holmes | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060143686 | Maes | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146184 | Gillard et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156219 | Haot et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060205362 | Chang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060236221 | McCausland et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259589 | Lerman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263039 | Chiang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274828 | Siemens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006177 | Aiber et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022404 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043860 | Pabari | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043875 | Brannon | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070113184 | Haot et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080043106 | Hassapis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080320599 | Raley et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0764951 | Mar 1997 | EP |
1463058 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1864229 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2000-341635 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-346164 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004-088384 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-320667 | Nov 2004 | JP |
9715018 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9739411 | Oct 1997 | WO |
0029980 | May 2000 | WO |
0201384 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2005027068 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Advanced Systems Format (ASF) Specification,” Microsoft Corporation, Revision 01.20.02, http://download.microsoft.com/download/E/0/6/E06DB390-1E2A-4978-82BB-311810D8A28D/ASF—Specification.doc, 104 pages, Jun. 2004. |
“Avipreview Frequently Asked Questions”, pp. 1-7, Retrieved from the internet: URL:http://www.avipreview.com/faq.htm [retrieved Jan. 21, 2009], Oct. 15, 2002. |
Bolle, et al., “Video Libraries: From Ingest to Distribution,” IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1614, pp. 15-18, DOI:10.1007/3-540-48762-X—2, Dec. 1999. |
David, “News Technology: The Cutting Edge,” Appears in Capturing the Action: Changes in Newsgathering Technology, IEEE Colloquium, pp. 4/1-4/8, Oct. 27, 1995. |
Gordon-Till, “My Opinion Is, Opinions Are Useful,” Information World Review, Issue 184, four pages, Oct. 2002. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070107032 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60714674 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11368750 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 11617263 | US |