Method and apparatus for testing cells and batteries embedded in series/parallel systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6906523
  • Patent Number
    6,906,523
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 9, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 14, 2005
    19 years ago
Abstract
A “three-point” measurement technique effectively removes system effects to determine impedance, admittance, resistance, or conductance of an individual cell, battery, or interconnecting conductor embedded in a series or series-parallel electrochemical battery or fuel cell system. Three electrical contact points are defined. Two of these points bound the subject element. The third point is separated from the other two by a conducting path that may include one or more cells or batteries. By measuring dynamic parameters between alternate pairs of contact points, three dynamic parameter measurements are acquired. A mathematical computation combines the measurements and determines the dynamic parameter of a subject element as if it were alone—thus effectively “de-embedding” the subject element from the remainder of the system. A “four-point” extension of this technique permits measuring a dynamic parameter of a cell/battery disposed in a multiple-unit string of parallel-connected cells/batteries.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to electronically testing electrochemical cells and batteries including fuel cells and batteries. More specifically, it relates to accurately determining a dynamic parameter of a particular element, i.e., cell, battery, or interconnecting conductor, embedded in a cell/battery system as if it were isolated from the system. Such a determination is referred to as “de-embedding” the subject element.


Electrochemical cells and batteries, such as primary cells/batteries, secondary (i.e., storage) cells/batteries, and fuel cells/batteries are important sources of electrical energy. Connecting such units together in series causes their voltages to add. Connecting them together in parallel causes their currents to add. Accordingly, series-connected cells/batteries, parallel-connected cells/batteries, and series/parallel combinations of cells/batteries are routinely found in many applications including automotive, traction, heavy equipment, standby, and telecommunication applications.


Precisely determining a dynamic electrical parameter (i.e., complex impedance, complex admittance, real resistance, or real conductance) of an individual cell/battery or interconnecting conductor embedded in a larger system without disconnecting the subject element from the system has traditionally posed an important challenge. Burkum, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,697,134, described one approach to this challenge. This patent teaches passing a known ac current through the parallel combination of a string of series-connected cells, a battery charger, and a load. It then determines the “impedance” of an individual cell or inter-cell connector by measuring the ac voltage developed across the cell or connector and taking the ratio of this measured ac voltage to the known ac current. However, this procedure determines only the magnitude of the complex impedance. Furthermore, the disclosed technique is subject to significant errors due to current-shunting by the charger and the load. The method of Burkum, et al., also ignores the influence of series strings that are in parallel with the desired string in multi-string installations—an arrangement commonly found in telephone central offices.


Methods and apparatus for measuring complex impedance and complex admittance of electrochemical cells and batteries as well as general electrical elements have recently been disclosed by Champlin in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,002,238, 6,172,483, 6,262,563, and 6,294,896. However, the techniques disclosed therein apply generally to measuring isolated elements. If the subject element is embedded in a larger battery/electrical system, the loading imposed by the remainder of the system may influence the results of the measurement.


The inventions disclosed herein remove this system influence by mathematically “de-embedding” a subject element, i.e., cell, battery or interconnecting conductor, from the remainder of the battery/electrical system. The disclosed method and apparatus permit accurately determining a dynamic parameter, i.e., impedance, admittance, resistance, or conductance, of an embedded element without actually disconnecting that element from the system.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention employs a “three-point” measurement technique to determine a dynamic parameter of an individual element (i.e., cell/battery or interconnecting conductor) embedded in a series, or series-parallel, electrochemical cell, battery, or fuel cell system. Three electrical contact points are defined. Two of these points bound the subject cell/battery or interconnecting conductor. The third point is separated from the other two by a conducting path that may include one or more cells or batteries. By measuring dynamic parameters between alternate pairs of contact points, three dynamic parameter measurements are acquired. A mathematical computation combines the measurements and determines the dynamic parameter of a subject element as if it were alone—thus effectively “de-embedding” the subject element from the remainder of the system. A “four-point” extension of this technique permits measuring a dynamic parameter of a cell, battery, or interconnecting conductor disposed in a multiple-unit string of parallel-connected cells or batteries.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic representation depicting the impedance of a cell/battery being measured while the cell/battery is connected to a load.



FIG. 2 is a simplified equivalent circuit representing the measurement arrangement of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a first impedance measurement of the circuit of FIG. 1 in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a second impedance measurement of the circuit of FIG. 1 in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a third impedance measurement of the circuit of FIG. 1 in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a simplified equivalent circuit of the circuit of FIG. 1 illustrating the three impedances measured in the measurements of FIGS. 3, 4, and 5.



FIG. 7 depicts measuring the impedance of a cell/battery embedded in a series string of such batteries with a plurality of series strings arrayed in parallel.



FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of a first impedance measurement of the circuit of FIG. 7 in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of a second impedance measurement of the circuit of FIG. 7 in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of a third impedance measurement of the circuit of FIG. 7 in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 11 depicts measuring the impedance of a cell/battery and/or interconnecting conductor embedded in the system of FIG. 7 using a special “three-point” impedance meter in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 12 is a block diagram representation of the special “three-point” impedance meter depicted in FIG. 11.



FIG. 13 is a block diagram representation of a special “n-point” impedance meter in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 14 is a flow chart of a control algorithm for “de-embedding” M single elements using the apparatus of FIG. 13.



FIG. 15 represents a part of a battery system and demonstrates general rules to be followed when choosing electrical contact points.



FIG. 16
a is a schematic representation of two cells/batteries connected in parallel and depicts the determination of a first cell/battery impedance and a first interconnecting conductor impedance in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 16
b is a schematic representation of two cells/batteries connected in parallel and depicts the determination of a second cell/battery impedance and a second interconnecting conductor impedance in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 17
a is a schematic representation of a parallel string of multiple cells/batteries and depicts the determination of the impedances of a cell/battery and interconnecting conductor on a first end of the string in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 17
b is a schematic representation of a parallel string of multiple cells/batteries and depicts the determination of the impedances of a cell/battery and interconnecting conductor on a second end of the string in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 18
a is a schematic representation of a parallel string of multiple cells/batteries and depicts conditions of a first set of three-point measurements used in the determination of the impedances of an interior cell/battery and interconnecting conductor in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 18
b is a schematic representation of a parallel string of multiple cells/batteries and depicts conditions of a second set of three-point measurements used in the determination of the impedances of an interior cell/battery and interconnecting conductor in accordance with a particular aspect of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Consider FIG. 1. This figure illustrates measuring the impedance of a cell/battery 10 embedded in a very simple system comprising cell/battery 10 connected to load 20 through interconnecting conductors 30 and 40. Impedances Z1, ZL, ZC1, and ZC2 represent the impedances of cell/battery 10, load 20, interconnecting conductor 30, and interconnecting conductor 40, respectively. Impedance meter 50, which may be of the type disclosed by Champlin in the four patents referenced above, couples to the two terminals of cell/battery 10 with Kelvin input probe 60 and Kelvin input probe 70. As is well known, Kelvin probes comprise two separate electrical connections to each contact point—one for current and one for voltage. Their purpose is to negate the effects of contact and lead-wire resistance. Although Kelvin probes are usually required to obtain accurate measurements with the very small impedance values encountered in most battery systems, the “three-point” measurement technique disclosed herein does not rely upon Kelvin probes. Single-conductor connections to each contact point will also suffice if impedance values are sufficiently large.



FIG. 2 shows an equivalent circuit representation of the simple battery system of FIG. 1. Because the series combination of ZL, ZC1, and ZC2 is in parallel with impedance Z1, the impedance Zm “seen” by impedance meter 50 is not actually Z1 but is instead the composite impedance:
Zm=Z1·(ZC1+ZC2+ZL)Z1+ZC1+ZC2+ZL(1)

The influence of impedances ZC1, ZC2, and ZL upon the measured impedance Zm is clearly observed in equation (1).


Now consider performing three impedance measurements as shown in FIGS. 3, 4, and 5.

    • First measure Zab (FIG. 3) with both Kelvin input probes of impedance meter 50 coupled to the two terminals, a and b, of the cell/battery being measured. Terminals a and b effectively “bound” cell/battery impedance Z1 and comprise the first two electrical contact points of a three-point measurement technique.
    • Next measure Zbc (FIG. 4) with Kelvin probe 60 coupled to terminal b, and Kelvin probe 70 bridging across interconnecting conductor 40 to couple to load 20 at contact point c. Point c comprises the third electrical contact point of the three-point measurement technique.
    • Finally, measure Zca (FIG. 5) with one Kelvin probe coupled to point c and the other coupled to point a.



FIG. 6 shows an equivalent circuit relating the three measured impedances, Zab, Zbc, and Zca, to the three system impedances Z1, Z2, and Z3. Note that this particular choice of electrical contact point c makes system impedance Z2 equal the interconnecting conductance impedance ZC2 while system impedance Z3=ZL+ZC1 combines the load impedance with the other interconnecting conductor impedance. The alternative choice of contact point c would make Z2=ZC1 and Z3=ZL+ZC2.


One can easily show from FIG. 6 that the three measured impedances are given by:
Zab=Z1·(Z2+Z3)Z1+Z2+Z3(2)Zbc=Z2·(Z3+Z1)Z1+Z2+Z3and(3)Zca=Z3·(Z1+Z2)Z1+Z2+Z3(4)

These three equations can be inverted mathematically to yield explicit expressions for Z1, Z2, and Z3, in terms of the measured quantities Zab, Zbc, and Zca. The results are
Z1=(Zab2+Zbc2+Zca2-2·Zbc·Zca-2·Zca·Zab-2·Zab·Zbc)2·(Zab-Zbc-Zca)(5)Z2=(Zab2+Zbc2+Zca2-2·Zbc·Zca-2·Zca·Zab-2·Zab·Zbc)2·(Zbc-Zca-Zab)and(6)Z3=(Zab2+Zbc2+Zca2-2·Zbc·Zca-2·Zca·Zab-2·Zab·Zbc)2·(Zca-Zab-Zbc)(7)


Equation (5) effectively “de-embeds” cell/battery 10 since Z1 would be its measured impedance if it were, in fact, completely disconnected from the system.


The three-point measurement technique disclosed above can be readily extended to the very important case depicted in FIG. 7. FIG. 7 illustrates an attempt to measure the impedance Z1 of cell/battery 10 embedded in a series string of cells/batteries, with a plurality of such strings arrayed in parallel. The parallel array may also include a load 80 and a rectifier 90 as shown. This arrangement is typical of battery systems routinely found in telephone central offices. Again, the loading associated with the remainder of the system can hinder accurate measurement of Z1 by impedance meter 50.


However, consider performing the three impedance measurements shown in FIGS. 8, 9, and 10.

    • First measure Zab (FIG. 8) with both Kelvin probes of impedance meter 50 coupled to the two terminals, a and b, of the subject cell/battery. These two terminals effectively “bound” the desired impedance Z1 and comprise the first two electrical contact points of the three-point measurement technique.
    • Next measure Zbc (FIG. 9) with Kelvin probe 60 coupled to contact point b, and Kelvin probe 70 bridging across an adjacent connector and an adjacent cell/battery to couple to contact point c. Point c comprises the third contact point of the three-point measurement technique.
    • Finally, measure Zca (FIG. 10) with Kelvin probe 70 coupled to point c and Kelvin probe 60 coupled to point a.


The experimental arrangements depicted in FIGS. 8, 9, and 10 have again divided the system into three impedances, Z1, Z2, and Z3. These three system impedances are identified in FIGS. 8, 9, and 10. System impedance Z1 is again the desired impedance of cell/battery 10. System impedance Z2 is an arbitrarily-defined adjacent impedance which includes the impedance of both an adjacent cell/battery and an interconnecting conductor; and system impedance Z3 is the impedance of all of the rest of the battery system—not including system impedances Z1 and Z2.


The equivalent circuit of FIG. 6 again describes the relationships between system impedances Z1, Z2, Z3 and measured impedances Zab, Zbc, and Zca. Accordingly, equations (5)-(7) again explicitly yield Z1, Z2, and Z3. Impedance Z1 represents the “de-embedded” subject cell/battery and is of particular interest. The value of Z1 is again given by equation (5):
Z1=(Zab2+Zbc2+Zca2-2·Zbc·Zca-2·Zca·Zab-2·Zab·Zbc)2·(Zab-Zbc-Zca)(5)


In the example depicted above, the particular choice of contact point c places both a cell/battery and an interconnecting conductor into impedance Z2. The measured value of Z2 is thus an arbitrary quantity that may be of little interest. However, one could just as well have chosen point c so that impedance Z2 contains only the impedance of the adjacent interconnecting conductor. In that case, impedance Z2 could be of considerable interest. Its value would be explicitly given by equation (6):
Z2=(Zab2+Zbc2+Zca2-2·Zbc·Zca-2·Zca·Zab-2·Zab·Zbc)2·(Zbc-Zca-Zab)(6)


Impedance Z3 describes the impedance of all of the rest of the battery system—not including impedances Z1 and Z2. Its value is explicitly given by equation (7):
Z3=(Zab2+Zbc2+Zca2-2·Zbc·Zca-2·Zca·Zab-2·Zab·Zbc)2·(Zca-Zab-Zbc)(7)


In principle, the three measurements could be performed in sequence using conventional impedance measuring circuitry such as the circuitry disclosed by Champlin in the U.S. patents referenced above. The complete measuring apparatus could comprise such circuitry along with a pencil and pad to record the readings and an external hand calculator or computer to evaluate the appropriate equation or equations that “de-embed” the subject element or elements. Alternatively, the apparatus could contain onboard memory circuitry to store the measurements and onboard computation circuitry to perform the “de-embedding” calculations after the required measurements have been made.


In addition, one could employ a special three-point impedance meter 100 connected as shown in FIG. 11. One sees in FIG. 11 that three-point impedance meter 100 possesses three sets of system-contacting Kelvin probes 110, 120, and 130 which simultaneously couple to electrical contact points a, b, and c, respectively. FIG. 12 discloses further that three-point impedance meter 100 contains a conventional two-point impedance meter 50 adapted to measure the impedance of an isolated element coupled between its Kelvin input probes 60 and 70. Switching or multiplexing circuitry 140 is interposed between input probes 60, 70 and system-contacting probes 110, 120, 130, and is adapted to selectively couple a pair of system-contacting probes (either 110 & 120, 120 & 130, or 130 & 110) to input probes 60 & 70.


Under programmed control of microprocessor/controller 150, switching/multiplexing circuitry 140 alternately couples each pair of system-contacting probes to input probes 60 and 70, and impedance meter 50 measures the impedance between its input probes 60 and 70. The resulting three measured impedances are temporarily stored in storage memory 160 and then processed by computation circuitry 170—which may, in fact, also comprise microprocessor/controller 150—to determine the subject embedded impedance or impedances using one or more of equations (5), (6), and (7). Three-point impedance meter 100 therefore “de-embeds” the subject impedances directly, without operator intervention.


One could also construct measuring apparatus 180 (FIG. 13) which is similar to three-point impedance meter 100, but is extended to have an arbitrary number n of system-contacting probes—where n is any integer between 3 and the number of interconnection points in the system. Under programmed control of microprocessor/controller 150, switching/multiplexing circuitry 140 alternately selects appropriate system-contacting probes in groups of three. By consecutively performing three-point measurements upon each selected group, and evaluating one or more of equations (5), (6) and (7) after each set of three impedance measurements, extended apparatus 180 can potentially “de-embed” every element in the entire system without operator intervention.



FIG. 14 discloses a flowchart of a control algorithm for “de-embedding” M single elements using the apparatus of FIG. 13. The algorithm begins at step 200. Step 210 initializes a measurement counter i, and step 220 initializes an element counter j. At step 230, a particular pair of system-contacting probes is selected by switching/multiplexing circuitry 140. The corresponding impedance between these probes is measured at step 240 and stored in memory 160 at step 250. At step 260, the measurement counter is tested. If it has not reached 3, the measurement counter is incremented and the measurements are repeated with a different pair of system-contacting probes. If the measurement counter has reached 3, computation circuitry 170 calculates the impedance of one embedded element from the three measured impedances stored in memory 160 at step 270. The element counter is then tested at step 280. If it has not reached M, the element counter is incremented and the procedure is repeated to “de-embed” another element. However, if the element counter has reached M, all M elements have been “de-embedded”, and the procedure terminates at step 290.


One sees from the discussion regarding FIGS. 8, 9, and 10 that electrical contact point c can be chosen rather arbitrarily if one is only interested in the impedance of a single element, Z1. This single element could be either a cell/battery or an interconnecting conductor. If one desires to additionally measure the impedance of the nearest adjacent element (interconnecting conductor or cell/battery), the interval between b and c (i.e., impedance Z2) must contain only that one adjacent element.


The general rules to be followed in choosing electrical contact points can be understood with reference to FIG. 15. Contact points a and b must “bound” the subject element whose impedance Z1 is desired to be measured. Furthermore, at least one of those two points must have no more than one conducting path proceeding from it. That single-path point is chosen as contact point b. Contact point c can then be any point along this single conducting path that can be reached without encountering an intervening branching path. There can be additional paths branching from point c itself; as there can also be from point a. These two possibilities are illustrated in FIG. 12. However no paths can branch from point b or from any intermediate junction point between b and c.


If only the value of Z1 is desired, the number of cells/batteries and conductors disposed between contact point b and contact point c is unrestricted. However, as a result of the “no-branch” rule, an element on the end of a series string in a multi-string parallel array must have its point c on the side of the element that is farthest from the parallel connection. An interior element of a series string, however, can have its contact point c on either side.


An extension of this three-point measurement technique can be used to “de-embed” elements of parallel strings of batteries—such as are frequently employed in trucks and heavy equipment.


First, consider a simple system of two cells/batteries connected in parallel. FIG. 16a depicts such a system and identifies a choice of electrical contact points that simultaneously “de-embeds” the cell/battery on the right of FIG. 16a and the interconnecting conductor on the bottom. With the experimental arrangement shown, impedances Z1 and Z2 are given by equations (5) and (6), respectively. FIG. 16b shows a choice of electrical contact points that simultaneously “de-embeds” the other two elements. With the experimental arrangement shown in FIG. 16b, impedances Z1′ and Z2′ are given by equations (5) and (6), respectively. Thus, all four elements of this simple parallel system can be “de-embedded” with two sets of three-point measurements.


Parallel strings of cells/batteries present a special challenge. Both terminals of a cell/battery in the interior of a parallel string have more than one conducting path leading from them. Accordingly, neither terminal satisfies the “no-branch rule” that must be satisfied by a contacting point b. However, the standard three-point measurement technique can still be applied to the interconnecting conductors and to the two cell/batteries on the ends of the string; and an extended form of the technique, a four-point, five-measurement, technique, can be applied to the cells/batteries in the interior.


First consider FIGS. 17a and 17b. These figures identify three electrical contact points used to “de-embed” the cells/batteries and interconnecting conductors on the ends of a multi-element parallel string. With the experimental arrangements shown, cell/battery impedances Z1 and Z1′ are given by equation (5) and interconnecting conductor impedances Z2 and Z2′ are given by equation (6). By simply re-arranging contact points, the impedances of the other two interconnecting conductors at the ends of this string can be similarly determined.


Now consider FIGS. 18a and 18b. These figures depict two experimental three-point measurement sets performed on a cell/battery and its interconnecting conductors disposed in the interior of a parallel string. Note that contact point c shifts from one side of the subject cell/battery to the other in the two experiments. However, Zab, the impedance measured between points a and b is the same in the two experiments. Thus, only five measurements are required to perform the two experiments.


Equation (6) unambiguously yields the interconnecting conductor impedances Z2 and Z2′ in the two experiments. However, because contact point b does not satisfy the “no-branch rule”, equation (5) does not yield Z1 directly in either experiment. Instead, equation (5) yields Z1 in parallel with Z4 in the first experiment and yields Z1 in parallel with Z4′ in the second experiment. However, Z4=Z2′+Z3′ is known from equations (6) and (7) of the second experiment, and Z4′=Z2+Z3 is known from equations (6) and (7) of the first experiment. Accordingly, by combining results of the two experiments, one can write the subject unknown cell/battery impedance Z1 as either
Z1=M1·(Z2+Z3)(Z2+Z3)-M1or(8)Z1=M1·(Z2+Z3)(Z2+Z3)-M1(9)

where M1, Z2, and Z3 are the results of evaluating equations (5), (6), and (7), respectively, in the first experiment, and M1′, Z2′, and Z3′ are the results of evaluating equations (5), (6), and (7), respectively, in the second experiment.


A special four-point impedance meter similar to three-point impedance meter 100 disclosed in FIG. 12, but having four system-contacting probes, could advantageously perform this four-point, five-measurement, procedure and “de-embed” any interior cell/battery in a parallel string without operator intervention.


For purposes of clarity, the above discussions have only considered complex impedance Z. However, it will be apparent to workers skilled in the art that the disclosed techniques apply equally well to measuring the reciprocal of complex impedance, complex admittance Y. Equations comparable to equation (5), (6), and (7) that give the unknown admittances Y1, Y2, and Y3 in terms of measured admittances Yab, Ybc, and Yac can be written
Y1=2YabYbcYca(YbcYca-YabYbc-YcaYab)Yab2Ybc2+Ybc2Yca2+Yca2Yab2-2(Yab2YbcYca+YabYbc2Yca+YabYbcYca2)(10)Y2=2YabYbcYca(YcaYab-YbcYca-YabYbc)Yab2Ybc2+Ybc2Yca2+Yca2Yab2-2(Yab2YbcYca+YabYbc2Yca+YabYbcYca2)and(11)Y3=2YabYbcYca(YabYbc-YcaYab-YbcYca)Yab2Ybc2+Ybc2Yca2+Yca2Yab2-2(Yab2YbcYca+YabYbc2Yca+YabYbcYca2)(12)


Furthermore, if reactive and susceptive effects can be ignored, the disclosed techniques can likewise be applied to measuring real dynamic resistance R and real dynamic conductance G. Equations comparable to equation (5), (6), and (7) that give unknown dynamic resistances R1, R2, and R3 in terms of measured dynamic resistances Rab, Rbc, and Rca are
R1=(Rab2+Rbc2+Rca2-2·Rbc·Rca-2·Rca·Rab-2·Rab·Rbc)2·(Rab-Rbc-Rca)(13)R2=(Rab2+Rbc2+Rca2-2·Rbc·Rca-2·Rca·Rab-2·Rab·Rbc)2·(Rbc-Rca-Rab)and(14)R3=(Rab2+Rbc2+Rca2-2·Rbc·Rca-2·Rca·Rab-2·Rab·Rbc)2·(Rca-Rab-Rbc)(15)


Similarly, equations comparable to equations (5), (6), and (7) that give unknown dynamic conductances G1, G2, and G3 in terms of measured dynamic conductances, Gab, Gbc and Gca are
G1=2GabGbcGca(GbcGca-GabGbc-GcaGab)Gab2Gbc2+Gbc2Gca2+Gca2Gab2-2(Gab2GbcGca+GabGbc2Gca+GabGbcGca2)(16)G2=2GabGbcGca(GcaGab-GbcGca-GabGbc)Gab2Gbc2+Gbc2Gca2+Gca2Gab2-2(Gab2GbcGca+GabGbc2Gca+GabGbcGca2)and(17)G3=2GabGbcGca(GabGbc-GcaGab-GbcGca)Gab2Gbc2+Gbc2Gca2+Gca2Gab2-2(Gab2GbcGca+GabGbc2Gca+GabGbcGca2)(18)

Since all four quantities, Z, Y, R, and G are measured with time-varying signals, they are referred to collectively as “dynamic parameters”.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. For example, single conductor probes rather than Kelvin probes could be employed if element impedances are sufficiently large. The required measurements could be simply performed using conventional measuring apparatus, results written down after each measurement and a hand calculator or computer subsequently employed to evaluate the appropriate equations. Alternatively, the measuring apparatus could itself contain onboard memory circuitry to store the measurements and onboard computation circuitry to perform the “de-embedding” calculations. Furthermore, the system-contacting probes could be multiplexed or switched, thus permitting the measuring apparatus to couple to the system at all of the desired contact points simultaneously. Although specific “de-embedding” examples employing three and five measurements have been disclosed, any number of measurements could actually be employed. The measurement steps could occur in any order or occur substantially simultaneously. “De-embedding” could be implemented with hand-held equipment carried to a site. It could also be implemented with permanently integrated measuring apparatus distributed throughout the entire system and adapted to automatically “de-embed” and monitor various elements of the system. These and other variations are believed to be well within the scope of the present invention and are intended to be covered by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. Apparatus for evaluating a dynamic parameter of an element embedded in a system of interconnected electrochemical cells or batteries, said element bounded by first and second electrical contact points, comprising: dynamic parameter measuring circuitry simultaneously coupled to said first and second contact points and rendering a first dynamic parameter measurement, simultaneously coupled to said second contact point and to a third electrical contact point displaced on a conducting path from said second contact point and rendering a second dynamic parameter measurement, and simultaneously coupled to said third contact point and to said first contact point and rendering a third dynamic parameter measurement, and; computation circuitry adapted to compute said dynamic parameter of said element from said first, second, and third dynamic parameter measurements.
  • 2. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said computation circuitry comprises a hand calculator or computer.
  • 3. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said computation circuitry comprises onboard computation circuitry.
  • 4. Apparatus as in claim 3 including onboard memory circuitry adapted to store said first, second, and third dynamic parameter measurements, for processing by said onboard computation circuitry.
  • 5. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said dynamic parameter measuring circuitry includes input multiplexing circuitry simultaneously coupled to said first, second, and third electrical contact points.
  • 6. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said dynamic parameter measuring circuitry couples to said first, second, and third electrical contact points with Kelvin probes.
  • 7. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex impedance.
  • 8. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex admittance.
  • 9. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic resistance.
  • 10. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic conductance.
  • 11. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said element is an electrochemical cell.
  • 12. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said element is an electrochemical battery.
  • 13. Apparatus as in claim 1 where said element is an electrical conductor.
  • 14. A method for evaluating a dynamic parameter of an element embedded in a system of interconnected electrochemical cells or batteries, said element bounded by first and second electrical contact points, comprising: obtaining a first dynamic parameter value existent between said first and second electrical contact points; obtaining a second dynamic parameter value existent between said second electrical contact point and a third electrical contact point in said system; obtaining a third dynamic parameter value existent between said third electrical contact point and said first electrical contact point; and, computing said dynamic parameter of said element from said first, second, and third dynamic parameter values.
  • 15. A method as in claim 14 wherein said first, second, and third dynamic parameter values are obtained by measurement.
  • 16. A method as in claim 14 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex impedance.
  • 17. A method as in claim 14 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex admittance.
  • 18. A method as in claim 14 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic resistance.
  • 19. A method as in claim 14 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic conductance.
  • 20. A method as in claim 14 wherein said element is an electrochemical cell.
  • 21. A method as in claim 14 wherein said element is an electrochemical battery.
  • 22. A method as in claim 14 wherein said element is an electrical conductor.
  • 23. A method as in claim 15 wherein said measurement employs Kelvin probes.
  • 24. A method for evaluating a dynamic parameter of an electrochemical cell or battery embedded internally in an array of parallel-connected electrochemical cells or batteries comprising: obtaining a first dynamic parameter value existent between first and second contact points comprising terminals of said electrochemical cell or battery; obtaining a second dynamic parameter value existent between said second contact point and a third contact point disposed on a first conducting path proceeding from said second contact point; obtaining a third dynamic parameter value existent between said second contact point and a fourth contact point disposed on a second conducting path proceeding from said second contact point; obtaining a fourth dynamic parameter value existent between said third contact point and said first contact point; obtaining a fifth dynamic parameter value existent between said fourth contact point and said first contact point; and, computing said dynamic parameter of said electrochemical cell or battery from said first, second, third, fourth, and fifth dynamic parameter values.
  • 25. A method as in claim 24 wherein said first, second, third, fourth, and fifth dynamic parameter values are obtained by measurement.
  • 26. A method as in claim 24 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex impedance.
  • 27. A method as in claim 24 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex admittance.
  • 28. A method as in claim 24 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic resistance.
  • 29. A method as in claim 24 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic conductance.
  • 30. A method as in claim 25 wherein said measurement employs Kelvin probes.
  • 31. A method for evaluating a dynamic parameter of an interconnecting conductor embedded internally in an array of parallel-connected electrochemical cells or batteries comprising: obtaining a first dynamic parameter value existent between first and second contact points bounding said interconnecting conductor, said second contact point comprising a first terminal of a cell or battery; obtaining a second dynamic parameter value existent between said second contact point and a third contact point comprising a second terminal of said cell or battery; obtaining a third dynamic parameter value existent between said first and third contact points; and, computing said dynamic parameter of said interconnecting conductor from said first, second, and third dynamic parameter values.
  • 32. A method as in claim 31 wherein said first, second, and third dynamic parameter values are obtained by measurement.
  • 33. A method as in claim 31 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex impedance.
  • 34. A method as in claim 31 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex admittance.
  • 35. A method as in claim 31 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic resistance.
  • 36. A method as in claim 31 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic conductance.
  • 37. A method as in claim 32 wherein said measurement employs Kelvin probes.
  • 38. Apparatus for evaluating dynamic parameters of first and second adjacent electrical elements having a common connecting point and embedded in a system of interconnected electrochemical cells or batteries comprising: dynamic parameter measuring circuitry simultaneously coupled to said first element at a first contact point and said common connecting point and rendering a first dynamic parameter measurement, simultaneously coupled to said second element at a second contact point and said common connecting point and rendering a second dynamic parameter measurement, and simultaneously coupled to said first and second contact points and rendering a third dynamic parameter measurement; computation circuitry adapted to compute said dynamic parameters of said first and second adjacent electrical elements from said first, second, and third dynamic parameter measurements.
  • 39. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said computation circuitry comprises a hand calculator or computer.
  • 40. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said computation circuitry comprises onboard computation circuitry.
  • 41. Apparatus as in claim 40 including onboard memory circuitry adapted to store said first, second, and third dynamic parameter measurements for processing by said onboard computation circuitry.
  • 42. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said dynamic parameter measuring circuitry includes input multiplexing circuitry simultaneously coupled to said first and second contact points and said common connecting point.
  • 43. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said dynamic parameter measuring circuitry couples to said first and second contact points and to said common connecting point with Kelvin probes.
  • 44. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex impedance.
  • 45. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex admittance.
  • 46. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic resistance.
  • 47. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic conductance.
  • 48. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said first and second adjacent electrical elements comprise an electrochemical cell and an interconnecting electrical conductor.
  • 49. Apparatus as in claim 38 wherein said first and second adjacent electrical elements comprise an electrochemical battery and an interconnecting electrical conductor.
  • 50. A method for evaluating dynamic parameters of first and second adjacent electrical elements having a common connecting point and embedded in a system of interconnected electrochemical cells or batteries comprising: obtaining a first dynamic parameter value existent between said common connecting point and a first contact point bounding said first electrical element; obtaining a second dynamic parameter value existent between said common connecting point and a second contact point bounding said second electrical element; obtaining a third dynamic parameter value existent between said first and second contact points; and, computing said dynamic parameters of said first and second adjacent electrical elements from said first, second, and third dynamic parameter values.
  • 51. A method as in claim 50 wherein said first, second, and third dynamic parameter values are obtained by measurement.
  • 52. A method as in claim 51 wherein said measurement employs Kelvin probes.
  • 53. A method as in claim 50 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex impedance.
  • 54. A method as in claim 50 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex admittance.
  • 55. A method as in claim 50 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic resistance.
  • 56. A method as in claim 50 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic conductance.
  • 57. A method as in claim 50 wherein said first and second adjacent electrical elements comprise an electrochemical cell and an electrical conductor.
  • 58. A method as in claim 50 wherein said first and second adjacent electrical elements comprise an electrochemical battery and an electrical conductor.
  • 59. Apparatus for de-embedding electrical elements embedded in a system of electrochemical cells/batteries and conductors interconnected at a plurality of interconnection points comprising: dynamic parameter measuring circuitry including two input probes, said measuring circuitry adapted to measure a dynamic parameter of an isolated electrical element coupled between said input probes; at least three system-contacting probes adapted to simultaneously couple to elements of said system at three or more electrical contact points; switching circuitry interposed between said input probes and said system-contacting probes and adapted to controllably couple said input probes to selected pairs of said system-contacting probes; control circuitry adapted to command said switching circuitry to consecutively couple different pairs of said system-contacting probes to said input probes and to command said dynamic parameter measuring circuitry to measure a dynamic parameter value during each said coupling; memory circuitry adapted to store each said measured dynamic parameter value; and, computation circuitry adapted to compute one or more dynamic parameters of said electrical elements from said measured dynamic parameter values stored in said memory circuitry.
  • 60. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said input probes comprise Kelvin input probes and said system-contacting probes comprise Kelvin system-contacting probes.
  • 61. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex impedance.
  • 62. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said dynamic parameter is complex admittance.
  • 63. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic resistance.
  • 64. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said dynamic parameter is dynamic conductance.
  • 65. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said electrical elements include one or more electrochemical cells.
  • 66. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said electrical elements include one or more electrochemical batteries.
  • 67. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said electrical elements include one or more electrical conductors.
  • 68. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said computation circuitry computes a dynamic parameter from three said measured dynamic parameter values.
  • 69. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said computation circuitry computes a dynamic parameter from five said measured dynamic parameter values.
  • 70. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said control circuitry and said computation circuitry comprise microprocessor or microcontroller circuitry.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/862,783, filed May 21, 2001 now abandoned, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/662,092, filed Sep. 14, 2000 now abandoned, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (320)
Number Name Date Kind
2000665 Neal May 1935 A
2514745 Dalzell Jul 1950 A
3356936 Smith Dec 1967 A
3562634 Latner Feb 1971 A
3593099 Scholl Jul 1971 A
3607673 Seyl Sep 1971 A
3652341 Halsall et al. Mar 1972 A
3676770 Sharaf et al. Jul 1972 A
3729989 Little May 1973 A
3750011 Kreps Jul 1973 A
3753094 Furuishi et al. Aug 1973 A
3796124 Crosa Mar 1974 A
3808522 Sharaf Apr 1974 A
3811089 Strezelewicz May 1974 A
3873911 Champlin Mar 1975 A
3876931 Godshalk Apr 1975 A
3886443 Miyakawa et al. May 1975 A
3889248 Ritter Jun 1975 A
3906329 Bader Sep 1975 A
3909708 Champlin Sep 1975 A
3936744 Perlmutter Feb 1976 A
3946299 Christianson et al. Mar 1976 A
3947757 Grube et al. Mar 1976 A
3969667 McWilliams Jul 1976 A
3979664 Harris Sep 1976 A
3984762 Dowgiallo, Jr. Oct 1976 A
3984768 Staples Oct 1976 A
3989544 Santo Nov 1976 A
4008619 Alcaide et al. Feb 1977 A
4023882 Pettersson May 1977 A
4024953 Nailor, III May 1977 A
4047091 Hutchines et al. Sep 1977 A
4053824 Dupuis et al. Oct 1977 A
4056764 Endo et al. Nov 1977 A
4070624 Taylor Jan 1978 A
4086531 Bernier Apr 1978 A
4112351 Back et al. Sep 1978 A
4114083 Benham et al. Sep 1978 A
4126874 Suzuki et al. Nov 1978 A
4160916 Papsideris Jul 1979 A
4178546 Hulls et al. Dec 1979 A
4193025 Frailing et al. Mar 1980 A
4207611 Gordon Jun 1980 A
4217645 Barry et al. Aug 1980 A
4280457 Bloxham Jul 1981 A
4297639 Branham Oct 1981 A
4315204 Sievers et al. Feb 1982 A
4316185 Watrous et al. Feb 1982 A
4322685 Frailing et al. Mar 1982 A
4351405 Fields et al. Sep 1982 A
4361809 Bil et al. Nov 1982 A
4363407 Barkler et al. Dec 1982 A
4369407 Korbell Jan 1983 A
4379989 Kurz et al. Apr 1983 A
4379990 Sievers et al. Apr 1983 A
4390828 Converse et al. Jun 1983 A
4392101 Saar et al. Jul 1983 A
4396880 Windebank Aug 1983 A
4408157 Beaubien Oct 1983 A
4412169 Dell′Orto Oct 1983 A
4423378 Marino et al. Dec 1983 A
4423379 Jacobs et al. Dec 1983 A
4424491 Bobbett et al. Jan 1984 A
4459548 Lentz et al. Jul 1984 A
4514694 Finger Apr 1985 A
4520353 McAuliffe May 1985 A
4620767 Woolf Nov 1986 A
4633418 Bishop Dec 1986 A
4659977 Kissel et al. Apr 1987 A
4663580 Wortman May 1987 A
4665370 Holland May 1987 A
4667143 Cooper et al. May 1987 A
4667279 Maier May 1987 A
4678998 Muramatsu Jul 1987 A
4679000 Clark Jul 1987 A
4680528 Mikami et al. Jul 1987 A
4697134 Burkum et al. Sep 1987 A
4707795 Alber et al. Nov 1987 A
4709202 Koenck et al. Nov 1987 A
4710861 Kanner Dec 1987 A
4719428 Liebermann Jan 1988 A
4743855 Randin et al. May 1988 A
4745349 Palanisamy et al. May 1988 A
4816768 Champlin Mar 1989 A
4820966 Fridman Apr 1989 A
4825170 Champlin Apr 1989 A
4847547 Eng, Jr. Jul 1989 A
4849700 Morioka et al. Jul 1989 A
4876495 Palanisamy et al. Oct 1989 A
4881038 Champlin Nov 1989 A
4912416 Champlin Mar 1990 A
4913116 Katogi et al. Apr 1990 A
4929931 McCuen May 1990 A
4931738 MacIntyre et al. Jun 1990 A
4933845 Hayes Jun 1990 A
4934957 Bellusci Jun 1990 A
4937528 Palanisamy Jun 1990 A
4947124 Hauser Aug 1990 A
4949046 Seyfang Aug 1990 A
4956597 Heavey et al. Sep 1990 A
4968941 Rogers Nov 1990 A
4968942 Palanisamy Nov 1990 A
5004979 Marino et al. Apr 1991 A
5032825 Kuznicki Jul 1991 A
5037778 Stark et al. Aug 1991 A
5047722 Wurst et al. Sep 1991 A
5087881 Peacock Feb 1992 A
5095223 Thomas Mar 1992 A
5108320 Kimber Apr 1992 A
5126675 Yang Jun 1992 A
5140269 Champlin Aug 1992 A
5144219 Conzelmann et al. Sep 1992 A
5144248 Alexandres et al. Sep 1992 A
5159272 Rao et al. Oct 1992 A
5160881 Schramm et al. Nov 1992 A
5170124 Blair et al. Dec 1992 A
5179335 Nor Jan 1993 A
5194799 Tomantschger Mar 1993 A
5204611 Nor et al. Apr 1993 A
5214370 Harm et al. May 1993 A
5214385 Gabriel et al. May 1993 A
5241275 Fang Aug 1993 A
5254952 Salley et al. Oct 1993 A
5266880 Newland Nov 1993 A
5281919 Palanisamy Jan 1994 A
5281920 Wurst Jan 1994 A
5295078 Stich et al. Mar 1994 A
5298797 Redl Mar 1994 A
5300874 Shimamoto et al. Apr 1994 A
5302902 Groehl Apr 1994 A
5313152 Wozniak et al. May 1994 A
5315287 Sol May 1994 A
5321626 Palladino Jun 1994 A
5321627 Reher Jun 1994 A
5323337 Wilson et al. Jun 1994 A
5325041 Briggs Jun 1994 A
5331268 Patino et al. Jul 1994 A
5336993 Thomas et al. Aug 1994 A
5338515 Dalla Betta et al. Aug 1994 A
5339018 Brokaw Aug 1994 A
5343380 Champlin Aug 1994 A
5347163 Yoshimura Sep 1994 A
5352968 Reni et al. Oct 1994 A
5365160 Leppo et al. Nov 1994 A
5365453 Startup et al. Nov 1994 A
5381096 Hirzel Jan 1995 A
5412308 Brown May 1995 A
5412323 Kato et al. May 1995 A
5426371 Salley et al. Jun 1995 A
5426416 Jefferies et al. Jun 1995 A
5432426 Yoshida Jul 1995 A
5434495 Toko Jul 1995 A
5435185 Eagan Jul 1995 A
5442274 Tamai Aug 1995 A
5445026 Eagan Aug 1995 A
5449996 Matsumoto et al. Sep 1995 A
5449997 Gilmore et al. Sep 1995 A
5451881 Finger Sep 1995 A
5453027 Buell et al. Sep 1995 A
5457377 Jonsson Oct 1995 A
5469043 Cherng et al. Nov 1995 A
5485090 Stephens Jan 1996 A
5488300 Jamieson Jan 1996 A
5519383 De La Rosa May 1996 A
5528148 Rogers Jun 1996 A
5537967 Tashiro et al. Jul 1996 A
5546317 Andrieu Aug 1996 A
5548273 Nicol et al. Aug 1996 A
5550485 Falk Aug 1996 A
5561380 Sway-Tin et al. Oct 1996 A
5562501 Kinoshita et al. Oct 1996 A
5572136 Champlin Nov 1996 A
5574355 McShane et al. Nov 1996 A
5583416 Klang Dec 1996 A
5585728 Champlin Dec 1996 A
5589757 Klang Dec 1996 A
5592093 Klingbiel Jan 1997 A
5592094 Ichikawa Jan 1997 A
5596260 Moravec et al. Jan 1997 A
5598098 Champlin Jan 1997 A
5602462 Stich et al. Feb 1997 A
5606242 Hull et al. Feb 1997 A
5621298 Harvey Apr 1997 A
5633985 Severson et al. May 1997 A
5637978 Kellett et al. Jun 1997 A
5642031 Brotto Jun 1997 A
5650937 Bounaga Jul 1997 A
5652501 McClure et al. Jul 1997 A
5653659 Kunibe et al. Aug 1997 A
5656920 Cherng et al. Aug 1997 A
5675234 Greene Oct 1997 A
5677077 Faulk Oct 1997 A
5699050 Kanazawa Dec 1997 A
5701089 Perkins Dec 1997 A
5705929 Caravello et al. Jan 1998 A
5710503 Sideris et al. Jan 1998 A
5711648 Hammerslag Jan 1998 A
5717336 Basell et al. Feb 1998 A
5717937 Fritz Feb 1998 A
5739667 Matsuda et al. Apr 1998 A
5745044 Hyatt, Jr. et al. Apr 1998 A
5747909 Syverson et al. May 1998 A
5747967 Muljadi et al. May 1998 A
5754417 Nicollini May 1998 A
5757192 McShane et al. May 1998 A
5760587 Harvey Jun 1998 A
5772468 Kowalski et al. Jun 1998 A
5773978 Becker Jun 1998 A
5780980 Naito Jul 1998 A
5789899 van Phuoc et al. Aug 1998 A
5793359 Ushikubo Aug 1998 A
5808469 Kopera Sep 1998 A
5818234 McKinnon Oct 1998 A
5821756 McShane et al. Oct 1998 A
5821757 Alvarez et al. Oct 1998 A
5825174 Parker Oct 1998 A
5831435 Troy Nov 1998 A
5850113 Weimer et al. Dec 1998 A
5862515 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1999 A
5865638 Trafton Feb 1999 A
5872443 Williamson Feb 1999 A
5872453 Shimoyama et al. Feb 1999 A
5895440 Proctor et al. Apr 1999 A
5914605 Bertness Jun 1999 A
5927938 Hammerslag Jul 1999 A
5929609 Joy et al. Jul 1999 A
5939855 Proctor et al. Aug 1999 A
5939861 Joko et al. Aug 1999 A
5945829 Bertness Aug 1999 A
5951229 Hammerslag Sep 1999 A
5961561 Wakefield, II Oct 1999 A
5961604 Anderson et al. Oct 1999 A
5969625 Russo Oct 1999 A
5978805 Carson Nov 1999 A
5982138 Krieger Nov 1999 A
6002238 Champlin Dec 1999 A
6005759 Hart et al. Dec 1999 A
6008652 Theofanopoulos et al. Dec 1999 A
6009369 Boisvert et al. Dec 1999 A
6031354 Wiley et al. Feb 2000 A
6031368 Klippel et al. Feb 2000 A
6037751 Klang Mar 2000 A
6037777 Champlin Mar 2000 A
6046514 Rouillard et al. Apr 2000 A
6051976 Bertness Apr 2000 A
6064372 Kahkoska May 2000 A
6072299 Kurle et al. Jun 2000 A
6072300 Tsuji Jun 2000 A
6081098 Bertness et al. Jun 2000 A
6081109 Seymour et al. Jun 2000 A
6091245 Bertness Jul 2000 A
6094033 Ding et al. Jul 2000 A
6104167 Bertness et al. Aug 2000 A
6114834 Parise Sep 2000 A
6137269 Champlin Oct 2000 A
6140797 Dunn Oct 2000 A
6144185 Dougherty et al. Nov 2000 A
6150793 Lesesky et al. Nov 2000 A
6158000 Collins Dec 2000 A
6161640 Yamaguchi Dec 2000 A
6163156 Bertness Dec 2000 A
6167349 Alvarez Dec 2000 A
6172483 Champlin Jan 2001 B1
6172505 Bertness Jan 2001 B1
6181545 Amatucci et al. Jan 2001 B1
6211651 Nemoto Apr 2001 B1
6222342 Eggert et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222369 Champlin Apr 2001 B1
6225808 Varghese et al. May 2001 B1
6236332 Conkright et al. May 2001 B1
6238253 Qualls May 2001 B1
6242887 Burke Jun 2001 B1
6249124 Bertness Jun 2001 B1
6250973 Lowery et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254438 Gaunt Jul 2001 B1
6259170 Limoge et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259254 Klang Jul 2001 B1
6262563 Champlin Jul 2001 B1
6275008 Arai et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294896 Champlin Sep 2001 B1
6294897 Champlin Sep 2001 B1
6304087 Bertness Oct 2001 B1
6307349 Koenck et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310481 Bertness Oct 2001 B2
6313607 Champlin Nov 2001 B1
6313608 Varghese et al. Nov 2001 B1
6316914 Bertness Nov 2001 B1
6323650 Bertness et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329793 Bertness et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331762 Bertness Dec 2001 B1
6332113 Bertness Dec 2001 B1
6346795 Haraguchi et al. Feb 2002 B2
6347958 Tsai Feb 2002 B1
6351102 Troy Feb 2002 B1
6356042 Kahlon et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359441 Bertness Mar 2002 B1
6363303 Bertness Mar 2002 B1
6384608 Namaky May 2002 B1
6388448 Cervas May 2002 B1
6392414 Bertness May 2002 B2
6411098 Laletin Jun 2002 B1
6417669 Champlin Jul 2002 B1
6424158 Klang Jul 2002 B2
6441585 Bertness Aug 2002 B1
6445158 Bertness et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456045 Troy et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466025 Klang Oct 2002 B1
6466026 Champlin Oct 2002 B1
6526361 Jones et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531848 Chitsazan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6600815 Walding Jul 2003 B1
6618644 Bean Sep 2003 B2
6628011 Droppo et al. Sep 2003 B2
6667624 Raichle et al. Dec 2003 B1
6679212 Kelling Jan 2004 B2
20020010558 Bertness et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020176010 Wallach et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030025481 Bertness Feb 2003 A1
20030184306 Bertness et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040000891 Raichle et al. Jan 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2 246 916 Oct 1990 GB
11103503 Apr 1999 JP
WO 0159443 Feb 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20020180445 A1 Dec 2002 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09862783 May 2001 US
Child 10119297 US
Parent 09662092 Sep 2000 US
Child 09862783 US