The present invention relates to firearms and more particularly to a method and device for reduction of a gun or weapon system jump, resulting from momentum created by the recoil force developed in the process of firing.
The disadvantage of known projectile firing guns and weapon systems is that each firing creates a recoil force not directed through the system support. The system support is usually located lower then the line representing the direction of the recoil force. Resulting momentum inevitably causes more or less noticeable movement of the system, for example human firing the pistol or tank firing the gun. Particularly it causes up movement (jump) of the weapon muzzle. This is the undesirable effect of firing since it creates a multitude of problems, for example, a necessity to build a heavier weapon for achieving at least partial inhibition of the jump and a necessity of spending extra time for restoring alignment of the weapon with the target after each shot. In the case of rapid automatic fire produced, for example, by submachine gun, these successive accumulated jumps result in the muzzle movement away from alignment with the target and consequently result in the target missing and the ammunition waste.
There are known devices designed for reducing negative results of the recoil force action, particularly for reducing the jump. Most of these devices create momentum acting in the direction opposite to the momentum causing jump and all of those devices utilize a redirection of a gas flow produced by the blast of ammunition. Most of the USA patents related to this issue are in Class 89/14.3 (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,665,804; 3,808,943; 4,207,799; 4,374,484; 4,392,413; 4,930,397; 6,269,727; 6,769,346; 7,207,255) and all of the devices described in these patents have the same shortcoming—the force created by gas flow is insufficient for producing significant desired contra-momentum.
Accordingly, it is the objective of the present invention to provide effective improvement over the aforementioned devices that is to significantly reduce muzzle jump.
The above objective is achieved by creating a momentum, rotating in the direction opposite to the rotational direction of the momentum causing muzzle jump by redirecting not gas flow produced by a blast of ammunition but redirecting a projectile traveling through the barrel. For this purpose in one embodiment a barrel of a gun or of a weapon system is bent in such a way that a longitudinal axis of the bent barrel is lying in a plane, perpendicular to a weapon system supporting surface; while an arc of the longitudinal axis of the bent barrel is convex in relation to the weapon system supporting surface. This plane usually has vertical orientation. In a process of firing, the projectile due to its inertia is supposed to move straight so it is pressing at a wall of the bent barrel and the wall is responding with a centripetal force causing the projectile to deviate from its straight direction due to the bend of the barrel. In accordance to Newton Law this centripetal force is equal to an “anticentripetal” force acting on the barrel in an opposite direction. This “anticentripetal” force creates a momentum rotating in the direction opposite to the rotational direction of the momentum created by the recoil force. In previous art the redirection of the gases is usually performed near an exiting end of the barrel for a maximum utilization of the expanding gases force and for delivering maximum energy to the projectile, at the same time achieving a maximum leverage for creating the maximum contra-momentum. A kinetic energy of the projectile is increasing during its travel through the barrel while a potential energy of the expanding gases is diminishing. Besides, only a portion of the gases could be redirected for producing the contra-momentum since part of them flow through the muzzle in the same direction as the projectile does. Also the mass of the redirected gases is considerably less than the mass of the projectile. For all those reasons previous art is not capable to significantly suppress the muzzle jump. In consideration of all of the above, utilization of proposed embodiment would provide for significantly more efficient muzzle jump reduction.
A radius of the barrel's bend is specific to a particular weapon and could be calculated considering weight and geometry of the weapon (position of the support and its distance to the barrel in the direction to the center of the barrel's bend), and considering weight and speed of the projectile, traveling through the barrel.
In another embodiment the barrel of the weapon is bent with small radius of the bend and comprises two straight lengths before and after the bend.
To provide for the possibility of utilizing this invention on existing guns one more embodiment is conceived as attachable device. This device comprises a housing having elongated cylindrical or conic mounting opening at its back end for attaching the device to a cylindrical or conic front end of the particular gun's barrel with the possibility of rotation in relation to this barrel's axis, housing having at its front end an elongated cylindrical opening with it's axes skewed in relation to the axes of the housing's back opening, and a cylindrical director inserted with the possibility of rotation in the elongated cylindrical opening of this housing's front end, the cylindrical director having an elongated passage, skewed in relation to it's outside cylindrical surface, that passage having a cone opening at a projectile entrance end. The device also has means for securing rotational angle position of the director in relation to the housing and means for securing rotational angle position of the housing in relation to the weapon's barrel.
Turning the director at a certain angle in the housing allows to change the angle between elongated axes of the housing and of the director. Since the axis of the housing mounting opening coincides with the axis of the barrel that action is changing the angle between elongated axes of the director and of the barrel. This way the angle can be changed from 0° to a maximum. A magnitude of the maximum angle change depends on a magnitude of the skewing angles of the cylindrical openings in the housing and in the director.
Turning the housing on the barrel and securing it in a new position allows a setting up of a resulting curvature plain in such a way (usually vertically) that it would coincide with the weapon system supporting point or it would be perpendicular to the system supporting surface, which means that the resulting momentum would be positioned in the same plane as the momentum causing jump of the barrel (as it was mentioned earlier, resulting momentum has the rotational direction opposite to the rotational direction of the momentum causing jump).
A specific modification of the mounting means of the device would allow attaching it to a specific gun barrel, and adjustment of the angle between elongated axes of the housing and of the director would allow providing an appropriate contra-momentum for a specific gun. This would make it possible to use the same principal design for the multitude of the weapon systems.
It is understood that the proposed design would cause extensive wear of the barrel in case of the first embodiment or of the attachment director in case of the preferred embodiment. For this reason implementation of the attachable device may have the most practical sense because a replacement of worn-out director of the attachment is a simple enough and more cost effective operation than replacement of the worn-out barrel which would require spending significantly more money on parts and labor.
It is also obvious that implementation of proposed design may require realignment of the weapon's aiming system which is achievable by known means and for that reason is not a subject of this invention.
With reference now to the
The magnitude of the radius Rb providing a momentum sufficient to compensate the jump of the barrel 1 depends on the mass and geometry of the weapon system and also depends on mass and speed of the projectile leaving the barrel 1.
For the practical purpose this method of jump compensation can be implemented using the device shown on the
The front end of the housing 2 has skewed cylindrical hole 18 (as best seen on
Director 3 has skewed cylindrical passage 13 for the projectile travel. A cone 14 is made at the back end of the director 3 to provide for an unimpeded entrance of the projectile coming from the barrel 1 and into the passage 13 of the director 3. A mark line 8 is placed next to the front flange of the housing 2 and a dial 7 is placed on a cylindrical surface of the director 3 front flange for setting-up proper desirable turn angle of the director 3 in relation to the longitudinal axis of the skewed cylindrical hole 18 of the housing 2.
Clamps 6 are placed in an undercut 15 of the housing 2 to provide for a possibility to lock director 3 in chosen angle position in relation to the longitudinal axis of the skewed cylindrical hole 18 of the housing 2. When screws 4 of said clamps 6 are tightened the contracting clamps 6 exert force on keys 14 squeezing director 3 and locking it in relation to the housing 2.
A described device allows a smooth change of the angle between axes of the skewed holes of the barrel 1 and of the director 3 from 0° to a maximum degree which is the sum of the skewing angles of the passage 13 axis in the director 3 and of the hole 18 axis in the housing 2.
Rotating the director 3 in the housing 2 is not only changing the angle between the axes as described above but also rotates a plane where these both axes are located. This action takes said axes plane out of alignment with the plane comprising the weapon system point of support Ps or with the plane which is perpendicular to a weapon system supporting surface (not shown). Rotating the whole device back to a proper angle in relation to the barrel 1 (usually to a vertical position) allows to align the axes plane with the plane comprising the weapon system point of support Ps or to align the axes plane with the plane which is perpendicular to a weapon system supporting surface (not shown). This way contra-momentum created by a projectile traveling through the passage 13 of the director 3 would most effectively work against momentum created by recoil.
In the proposed design for providing vertical position for both—jump momentum plane and contra-momentum plane, rotation angle of the device (in direction opposite to rotation of director 3) is equal to:
A
DV°=(180°−ADR°)/2
ADV°—rotation angle of the device,
ADR°—rotation angle of the director 3.