1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of microphones and more particularly to a tooth bone conduction microphone method and apparatus using two-way communication.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Conventional (air-conduction type) microphones are routinely used for converting sound into electrical signals. One such application is the Phraselator that is currently used by Department of Defense. The Phraselator primarily consists of a microphone, an automatic speech recognition module, a language translator, and a voice synthesizer with a speaker. The English phrases spoken by the user is captured by the microphone and translated to other languages such as Dari (used in Afghanistan), and sent to a speaker, which announces the equivalent Dari phrase.
Although usable, the Phraselator is highly vulnerable to typical military noise environment resulting in degradation of its performance. The performance improves when the user holds the microphone very close to his mouth, however it still does not work all the time. The microphone, due to the presence of typical military environment noise, does not accurately capture the spoken words. Microphones pick up the acoustic signals coming from any direction from any source and cannot distinguish. Directional microphones are superior in applications if the source of the sound is always from the same direction. However, even the best directional microphones have limitations when used in military noise environment. Conventional microphones cannot differentiate between the human voice and any other environmental sound. They are unable to reproduce the spoken sounds faithfully. In addition, the reverberation of the spoken sound introduces additional complexity in conventional microphones by way of repeated sound waves. Therefore, there is an immediate need to develop a microphone or an equivalent module that is immune to the surrounding noise(military or otherwise)and has improved signal to noise ratio.
The action of speaking uses lungs, vocal chords, reverberation in the bones of the skull, and facial muscle to generate the acoustic signal that is released out of mouth and nose. The speaker hears this sound in two ways. The first one called “air conduction hearing” is initiated by the vibration of the outer ear (eardrum) that in turn transmits the signal to the middle ear (ossicles) followed by inner ear (cochlea) generating signals in the auditory nerve which is finally decoded by the brain to interpret as sound. The second way of hearing, “bone conduction hearing,” occurs when the sound vibrations are transmitted directly from the jaw/skull to the inner ear thus by-passing the outer and middle ears. As a consequence of this bone conduction hearing effect, we are able to hear our own voice even when we plug our ear canals completely. That is because the action of speaking sets up vibration in the bones of the body, especially the skull. Although the perceived quality of sound generated by the bone conduction is not on par with the sounds from air conduction, the bone conducted signals carry information that is more than adequate to reproduce spoken information.
There are several microphones available in the market that use bone conduction and are worn externally making indirect contact with bone at places like the scalp, ear canal, mastoid bone (behind ear), throat, cheek bone, and temples. They all have to account for the loss of information due to the presence of skin between the bone and the sensor. For example, Temco voiceducer mounts in ear and on scalp, where as Radioear Bone Conduction Headset mounts on the cheek and jaw bone. Similarly, throat mounted bone conduction microphones have been developed. A microphone mounting for a person's throat includes a plate with an opening that is shaped and arranged so that it holds a microphone secured in said opening with the microphone contacting a person's throat using bone conduction. Bone conduction microphones worn in ear canal pick up the vibration signals from the external ear canal. The microphones mounted on the scalp, jaw and cheek bones pick the vibration of the skull at respective places. Although the above-referred devices have been successfully marketed, there are many drawbacks. First, since the skin is present between the sensor and the bones the signal is attenuated and may be contaminated by noise signals. To overcome this limitation, many such devices require some form of pressure to be applied on the sensor to create a good contact between the bone and the sensor. This pressure results in discomfort for the wearer of the microphone. Furthermore, they can lead to ear infection (in case of ear microphone) and headache (in case of scalp and jaw bone microphones) for some users.
There are several intra-oral bone conduction microphones that have been reported. In one known case, the microphone is made of a magnetostrictive material that is held between the upper and lower jaw with the user applying a compressive force on the sensor. The teeth vibration is picked up by the sensor and converted to electrical signal. The whole sensor is part of a mouthpiece of a scuba diver.
Also, some experimental work has been done in using a tethered piezoelectric-based accelerometer mounted on teeth to measure bone conduction induced vibration and compared to standard signals. The accelerometer protruded through the lips making the approach difficult to implement in practice. The sensor is bulky and puts unbalanced load on the teeth making them useful only for experimental purposes, at the best. Therefore there still exists a need for a compact, comfortable, economical, and practical way of exploiting the tooth bone vibration to configure an intra-oral microphone and preferably wireless.
Two way communication using microphones and earset/headset is common in the art. With conventional microphone the two-way communication between two parties, with at least one situated in a noisy environment, is difficult at best. With an air conduction microphone, the speaker in the noisy environment typically needs to speak louder, often repeat, must orient himself away from the oncoming noise, keep the microphone very close to his mouth, and cover the microphone to reduce noise entering directly into the microphone. Even with this tiresome effort, there is no guarantee that the other party has heard everything. On the other hand, with bone conduction microphones, two way communication is done by wearing the bone conduction microphone externally making indirect contact with bone at places like the scalp, ear canal, mastoid bone (behind ear), throat, cheek bone, and temples. Bone conduction microphones have two major drawbacks; (1) they all have to account for the loss of information due to the presence of skin between the bone and the sensor that typically result in attenuation and loss of bandwidth, and (2) typically they require some form of pressure to create a good contact between the bone and the sensor that can lead to ear infection in case of ear microphone and headache in case of scalp and jaw bone microphones.
Intra-oral bone conduction microphones can be used for two way communication using magnetostrictive material-based microphones held between the upper and lower jaw, with the user applying a compressive force on the sensor. This technology is mostly suitable for scuba diving applications where the user does not have to make comprehensive conversation and is limited to short term use. Therefore, there exists a need for a noise immune two way communication technology that works well in background noise, does not require uncomfortable pressure on the bone, is easy to use, and has low in cost.
The present invention relates to a tooth microphone apparatus worn in a human mouth that includes a sound transducer element in contact with at least one tooth in mouth, the transducer producing an electrical signal in response to speech and a means for transmitting said electrical signal from the sound transducer to an external apparatus. The sound transducer can be a MEMS accelerometer, and the MEMS accelerometer can be coupled to a signal conditioning circuit for signal conditioning. The signal conditioning circuit can be further coupled to the means for transmitting said electrical signal. The means for transmitting said electrical signal can be an RF transmitter of any type, in particular a bluetooth device or a device that transmits into a Wi-Fi network or any other means of communication in particular Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) band may be used. The transmitter is optional.
The present invention also relates to two-way communication between parties, especially when one of the parties is situated in a noisy environment. A communicator(s) situated in the noisy environment can wear a tooth bone conduction microphone in the mouth and will be able to transmit his/her voice with high signal to noise ratio and filtering out the surrounding noise. Hence the speaker can have hands-free conversation at normal voice level, does not have to repeat often, having complete freedom to stay in the location and position desired. Simultaneously the communicator(s) situated in the noisy environment can hear the voice transmitted by the other party through a conventional earset/headset. Two or more parties can communicate to each other with comfort even if they are situated in a noisy environment.
The present invention, a high sensitivity tooth microphone, uses the above-referred teeth vibration as the source of sound. The high sensitivity tooth microphone can include a high sensitivity accelerometer integrated with a signal conditioning circuit, and a probe. Optionally for wireless communication, a switch can be added to the microphone. An RF transmitter, power source, and Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or other wireless communication technology can be used to transmit out of the mouth to a nearby receiver.
A free end of the probe is held in contact with the teeth during the action of speaking. The high sensitivity tooth microphone converts the teeth vibration produced by speaking to a proportional electrical signal. This electrical signal can either be directly fed to a speaker or stored for later retrieval and use or fed to a processor for translation.
There are several features of the high sensitivity tooth microphone that makes it ideal for minimizing or even eliminating the effect of all sounds that are not generated by the wearer of the microphone. The most important are:
The high sensitivity tooth microphone can use a micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) accelerometer or any other accelerometer that can be mounted in the human mouth. This is generally a single axis vibration sensor along with a signal amplifier on a single chip. It can have typical parameters such as a 225-μg/√Hz-noise floor, 10-kHz bandwidth. It can also be equipped with an on-board temperature sensor, which can be used for calibrating against temperature effects.
The basic configuration of the high sensitivity tooth microphone is as shown in
Packaging the high sensitivity tooth microphone is also an important aspect of the present invention. The technology of using teeth vibration for microphone use is generally the same irrespective of which specific tooth is used for coupling the probe. Although there are usually some minor variations between teeth, the overall signal is still sufficient to capture all the characteristics of the spoken sound no matter which tooth (or teeth) is chosen. The only difference is the final packaging of the microphone that varies by tooth placement, and whether it is maxillary or mandibular.
Similarly, in the preferred method, the outside of the right side molar teeth of upper jaw can be used for coupling purposes. One can easily reconfigure this device to couple with other (either upper jaw or lower jaw) surface of the teeth in all possible combinations. The choices of specific teeth depend on the user preference and wear comfort level.
Once the high sensitivity tooth microphone is embedded in acrylic, it can be placed at the desired teeth location and encased in a polypropylene-based thermoplastic or equivalent material that has good wear resistance and durability. Although this process of fabricating the retainer can be achieved in several ways, vacuum forming is most economical.
Experiments have shown that the high sensitivity tooth microphone reproduces the entire spectrum of speech. Tests with “speech alphabets” that cover the full range of teeth vibration frequency, viz., vowels, diphthongs, plosives, nasals, fricatives, and approximants show excellent reproducibility. From these results, it is clear that the high sensitivity tooth microphone using bone conduction vibration, is a viable alternate to the conventional microphone.
Furthermore, the high sensitivity tooth microphone has been tested in noisy environments that proved that the new high sensitivity microphone is able to filter all sounds except the sounds produced by the wearer of the high sensitivity tooth microphone. For simplicity, the noise frequency range may be limited to 10 KHz. Most of the spoken voice can be captured from 200 to 8 KHz. So, with a 10 KHz it is assured that all the spoken sound signals can be captured. Simultaneously, the spoken language under noisy environment can be captured by conventional microphone for evaluation purposes. It was found out that the high sensitivity tooth microphone produces very high signal to noise ratio sound than conventional microphone since bone conduction is immune to the noise environment.
This unique features of the present invention make it ideal for applications that require communication in a noisy environment. This new microphone apparatus and method has many applications such as the Phraselators used by the Department of Defense, communication in professional sports, communication in airport tarmacs, naval aircraft carriers, language translators, audio components, communication in aircrafts, communication in underwater, communication with masks on, wearable computers, and special medical applications, to name a few.
By adding a wireless communication unit, the high sensitivity tooth microphone has no physical wires exiting the mouth making the use most comfortable.
Another embodiment of the present invention is as shown in
Many other embodiments are possible including, teeth cap with the integrated high sensitivity tooth microphone; the device attached to implants or denture, manually holding the embedded high sensitivity tooth microphone against teeth etc. When used as teeth cap or manually holding against teeth, there is no need to custom fit the user.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a two-way bone conducting communication device that is very useful when one of the parties is situated in a noisy environment. A functional block diagram of a two-way bone conducting communication device using a tooth bone conduction microphone is as shown in
The wireless tooth bone conduction microphone can be worn in the mouth as previously described. This wireless tooth bone conduction microphone can have at least two components: a tooth bone conduction microphone and a miniaturized wireless transmitter or other transmission means. The wireless tooth bone conduction microphone generally converts the spoken sounds into electrical signals that are converted to digital data and then transmitted in wireless manner at a particular frequency. In the preferred embodiment, the miniaturized wireless transmission can take place at a nominal 433 MHz. There are any number of other frequencies that could be used. Any frequency is within the scope of the present invention.
The communicator or retransmission module normally includes a multi-frequency transceiver. The user can wear this module on his body, preferably at the waist, to enable two-way communication as shown in
An example will now be given of communication between two parties using the two-way bone conducting communication system of the present invention. User A, wearing a tooth bone conduction microphone, initiates the conversation by turning on a tongue operated switch shown in
The reverse process of User A hearing what User B is saying is same as except that now the User B initiates the process by operating the tongue operated switch located in his BF Mic. Also, the users of two way bone conducting communication devices can keep the tongue operated switch in continuously on position by simply pressing and holding the switch for a pre-selected time span.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the two-way bone conducting communication device can easily be used by eliminating wireless feature between the tooth bone conduction microphone, communicator module, and earset/headset and instead use physical cables in applications where it is advantageous. Also, the wireless communication technology and frequency can be substituted with other similar technologies that have the same function. The frequency of communication for both the short range and long range transceivers of the two way bone conducting communication device can be changed to give the system more flexibility.
A few of the novel features of the present invention are as follows:
Some of the applications that can benefit from these unique features are:
It will be noted that several descriptions and figures have been used to explain the present invention. The present invention is not limited by these. One of skill in the art will recognize that many changes and variations are possible. Such changes and variations are within the scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 10/745,226 filed Dec. 23, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,269,266 which was related to an claimed priority from provisional patent application 60/461,601 filed Apr. 8, 2003 and to provisional patent application 60/517,746 filed Nov. 6, 2003. Applications 60/461,601 and 60/517,746 are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4498461 | Hakansson | Feb 1985 | A |
4562432 | Sremac | Dec 1985 | A |
5033999 | Mersky | Jul 1991 | A |
5163093 | Frielingsdorf et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5327506 | Stites, III et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5447489 | Issalene et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455842 | Mersky et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5460593 | Mersky et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5579284 | May | Nov 1996 | A |
5706251 | May | Jan 1998 | A |
6411828 | Lands et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6823171 | Kaario | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20010024507 | Boesen | Sep 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050196008 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60461601 | Apr 2003 | US | |
60517746 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10745226 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11100214 | US |