The present invention relates, generally, to a method and apparatus for increasing locomotor muscle size and strength at low training intensities and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for increasing locomotor muscle size and strength at low training intensities by utilizing eccentric ergometry.
It is commonly accepted that at least minimal physical activity is necessary to maintain muscle mass. If such minimal activity is lacking, the muscular system becomes atrophied and muscle mass diminishes. Muscular activity is energetically consuming, i.e. oxygen consumption by the muscular system increases heavily during physical activity. For example, oxygen consumption for a healthy person at rest may increase 10-15 times with physical activity. If an adequate amount of oxygen fails to reach the muscle, physical activity will be limited. Inadequate oxygen delivery may be due to a disorder in oxygen reception in the lungs or to insufficient transport of the oxygen to the muscles. Insufficient pumping of the heart is designated heart insufficiency. Muscle reduction begins in those with heart disease as a result of insufficient activation of the heart muscles. This in turn leads to a further reduction of the pumping performance of the heart thereby resulting in circulus vitiosus. The present invention can be used to interrupt this process or condition.
Strength gains occur when muscle produces force. If the muscle shortens while producing force, it produces concentric (Con) positive work. If it lengthens while producing force, work is done on the muscle resulting in eccentric (Ecc) negative work. A muscle action is designated “concentric” if the force of a muscle overcomes an applied resistance and a muscle action is designated “eccentric” if the muscle force is less than the applied resistance. “Acceleration work” results from concentric contractions and “deceleration work” results from eccentric contractions. For example, one may imagine that ascending a mountain requires exclusively concentric work and that descending the same mountain requires mostly only eccentric work: From a physical point of view, equal energy is converted in both cases. In ascending, potential energy is gained while in descending, the same amount of energy is lost. Although physically the same energy amounts are converted, the amount of energy to be spent by the muscular system for ascending is much higher than the amount of energy lost in descending. Five to seven times more energy is spent for concentric work as is spent for physically equal eccentric work.
The magnitude of strength gains seems to be a function of the magnitude of the force produced regardless of its Ecc or Con work. Ecc training has the capability of “overloading” the muscle to a greater extent than Con training because much greater force can be produced eccentrically than concentrically. Accordingly, Ecc training can result in greater increases in strength.
Furthermore, the Ecc mode of contraction has another unique attribute. The metabolic cost required to produce force is greatly reduced; muscles contracting eccentrically get “more for less” as they attain high muscle tensions at low metabolic costs. In other words, Ecc contractions cannot only produce the highest forces in muscle vs. Con or isometric contractions, but do so at a greatly reduced oxygen requirement (Vo2). This observation has been well-documented since the pioneering work of Bigland-Ritchie and Woods (Integrated eletromyogram and oxygen uptake during positive and negative work, Journal of Physiology (Lond) 260:267-277, 1976) who reported that the oxygen requirement of submaximal Ecc cycling is only ⅙- 1/7 of that for Con cycling at the same workload.
Typically, single bouts of Ecc exercise at high work rates (200-250 W for 30-45 minutes) result in muscle soreness, weakness, and damage in untrained subjects. Therefore, the common perception remains that Lcc muscle contractions necessarily cause muscle pain and injury. Perhaps because of this established association between Lcc contractions and muscle injury, few studies have examined prolonged exposure to Ecc training and its effect on muscle injury and strength. Nonetheless, Ecc contractions abound in normal activities such as walking, jogging, descending/walking down any incline, or lowering oneself into a chair to name just a few. Obviously, these activities occur in the absence of any muscular damage or injury.
Accordingly, there is a need for providing chronic Ecc training techniques and/or apparatus that can improve locomotor muscle strength without causing muscle injury.
Because muscles contracting eccentrically produce higher force, and require less energy to do so, Ecc training possesses unique features for producing both beneficial functional (strength increases) and structural (muscle fiber size increases) changes in locomotor muscles. For example, because Ecc work can over load muscle at Vo2 levels that have little or no impact on muscle when the work is performed concentrically, then strength and muscle size increases might be possible in patients who heretofore have difficulty maintaining muscle mass due to sever cardiac and respiratory limitations.
The present invention is directed to a device for applying torque-controlled eccentric training to a human muscular system and includes means for applying a torque transfer to the human muscular system, display means for displaying deceleration power data produced by the muscular system in resisting the torque transfer, and means for detecting and processing deceleration data for adjusting the torque transfer to the human muscular system. In one aspect of the invention, the means for applying a torque transfer includes a drive motor coupled to a turning or pedal crank. The drive motor may also be controlled by a controller that can also be optionally coupled to the display means. The controller operates conditions of the drive motor and can comprise a computer program that can process measured motor data and variables measured by the means for detecting and processing the deceleration data with algorithms for obtaining operating conditions of the drive motor.
In another aspect of the invention, the device may also include at least one flywheel positioned between the drive motor and the turning crank.. The drive motor can be connected to the turning crank by one or more chains which could also take the form of toothed belts or a cardan shaft. The device may also include at least one idler between the drive motor and the flywheel.
In still another aspect of the invention, the device includes an adjustable seat which is connected to a solid frame along with the drive motor and turning crank in order to stabilize the device. There may also be an on/off switch for the drive motor located near the adjustable seat so that a user can switch the device on and off from a user's seated position for training.
The present invention also includes a method for torque-controlled eccentric exercise training using the previously described device which includes selecting operation parameters at the turning crank, processing measured data that is detected; monitoring operation conditions of the drive motor; displaying produced deceleration power and operation parameters at the turning crank on a display device; and controlling the drive motor according to selected operation conditions.
The present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and:
The present invention is directed to a method and apparatus for increasing locomotor muscle size and strength at low training intensities utilizing eccentric ergometry. The apparatus of the present invention comprises means for applying a torque transfer to the human muscular system. The apparatus is directed to an eccentric ergometer device 10, shown in
In constructing the eccentric ergometer device 10, the power train of a standard cycle ergometer (e.g., a MONARCH® cycle ergometer) may be used. The adjustable seat 18 may comprise a recumbent seat and the device 10 may be driven, for example, by a three-horsepower direct current (DC) motor with one or more idlers between the motor 12 and the flywheel 16. The gear ratio from the flywheel 16 to the turning or pedal crank 14 is preferably about 1:3.75. As previously stated, all components are mounted to a steel frame 20 for stability. A motor controller 28 controls the motor speed and preferably has a 0 to 10 Volt output for both motor speed and load. The magnetic sensor 26 monitors pedal revolutions per minute (rpm) which is preferably displayed to the rider/user during the training session. The voltage and amperage outputs from the controller 28 are monitored through an analog-to-digital board and dedicated computer. The motor 12 also includes an on/off switch 30 which is accessible by a user in order to switch the device on and off from the position of use. A safety shut off may also be included which may be programmed to automatically shut off the motor once certain predetermined parameters are reached.
The ergometer device 10 can be calibrated by using the original standard ergometers friction band and applying known loads (via weights) as the motor 12 moves the flywheel 16 in a forward direction at a fixed rpm and reading the amperage/voltage of the motor. Therefore, for a fixed load and rpm, the calibration performed in the forward direction also serves to calibrate the reverse direction of the flywheel. Accordingly, the Ecc work rate is maintained by a user resisting the pedal motion at a fixed rate.
Turning now to
Examples of Training Regimens Used With Eccentric Ergometer Device of the Present Invention
Six Week Training Regimen:
Subjects and training regimen: Nine healthy subjects 18-34 (mean 21.5) years old were assigned at random to one of two exercise training groups: 1) an Ecc cycle ergometer like that shown in
Measurements: To assess skeletal muscle strength changes, maximal voluntary isometric strength produced by the knee extensors was measured with a Cybex dynamometer before, after and during training. Vo2 was measured once a week while training with an open spirometric system with subjects wearing a loose fitting mask. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to determine the perception of lower extremity muscle soreness. Subjects were asked to report a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale rating.
The results of the study demonstrated that if the Ecc work rate is ramped up during the first four weeks and then maintained for at least two weeks, strength gains can be made with minimal muscle soreness and without muscle injury as noted by the VAS and no loss in leg strength at any time during the study. In fact, leg strength increased significantly in the Ecc group. (See
With respect to
The strength enhancements using the method and apparatus of the present invention, with very minimal cardiac demand, may have profound clinical applications. Despite improvements in strength and muscle mass with high-intensity resistance training in healthy elderly, many with cardiovascular disease cannot exercise at intensities sufficient to improve skeletal muscle mass and function. Exercise intensity in this population is often severely limited by the inability of the cardiovascular system to deliver adequate oxygen to fuel muscles at levels significantly above resting. For many elderly patients, the symptom inducing metabolic limits have been estimated as low as 3 METS which is equivalent to con cycling at approximately 50 W on an ergometer. Such work rates may be insufficient to adequately stress muscle and prevent muscle atrophy and the concomitant functional decline. This group of patients with chronic heart failure and/or obstructive pulmonary disease could maintain their muscle mass and potentially even experience an increase in muscle strength during their exercise rehabilitation by using the method and apparatus of the present invention.
Eight Week Training Regimen:
Subjects and training regimen: Fourteen healthy male subjects with a mean age of 23.9 years (range, 19-38 years) were systematically grouped to create two groups of seven subjects, each with an equivalent mean peak oxygen consumption (Vo2peak). the two groups were assigned at random to one of the following two groups: 1) an Ecc cycle ergometer like that shown in
Each subject performed a Vo2peak test on a traditional Con ergometer and the subject” peak heart rate (HRpeak) was defines as the heart rate obtained at Vo2peak. Training exercise intensity was set to a fixed and identical percentage of HRpeak (%HRpeak) in both groups of subjects and heart rate was monitored over every training session for the 8 weeks of training. %HRpeak was progressively ramped for both groups in an identical fashion during the training period, from an initial 54% to a final 65% HRpeak. (See
Measurements: All measurements were the same as the six week training regimen discussed above in addition to the following: Total work (joules) on the Ecc ergometer per training session was calculated by integrating the work rate (watts), determined directly from a 0 to 10 volt output from the motor, which was calibrated to a known work rate, over the total duration of each training session. The total work per training session was calculated on the Con recumbent ergometer by multiplying the work rate displayed on the calibrated ergometer by the duration of each training session. A single needle biopsy from the vastus lateralis at the midthigh level was taken 2 days before the beginning of the study and 1-2 days after the eight week study ended to measure muscle fiber ultrastructure and fiber area. The capillary-to-fiber ratio was determined by counting the number of capillaries and fibers via capillary and fiber profiles from electron micrographs.
Ecc and Con cycle ergometry training workloads increased progressively as the training exercise intensity increased over the weeks of training. Both groups exercised at the same %HRpeak, and there was no significant difference between the groups at any point during training. But, the increase in work for the Ecc group was significantly greater than the Con group as shown in
This study demonstrates that if the training exercise intensity is ramped up and equalized for both groups over the first 5 weeks and then maintained for three additional weeks, then large differences in muscle force production, measured as total work, result comparing the Ecc and Con groups. This increased force production in the Ecc group apparently stimulated significant increases in isometric strength and fiber size, neither of which occurred in the Con group.
The method and apparatus of the present invention enable an Ecc skeletal muscle paradigm that can be used in clinical settings to deliver greater stress to locomotor muscles (workloads exceeding 100 W), without severely stressing the oxygen delivery capacity of the cardiovascular system. Patients with chronic heart failure and/or obstructive pulmonary disease could at least maintain their muscle mass and perhaps even experience an increase in muscle size and strength using the method and apparatus of the present invention.
The foregoing description is of exemplary embodiments of the subject invention. it will be appreciated that the foregoing description is not intended to be limiting; rather, the exemplary embodiments set forth herein merely set forth some exemplary applications of the subject invention. It will be appreciated that various changes, deletions, and additions may be made to the components and steps discussed herein without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Financial assistance for this project was provided by the U.S. Government through the National Science Foundation under Grant Number IBN9714731; and the United States Government may own certain rights to this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US01/06660 | 2/28/2001 | WO | 00 | 10/29/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/64297 | 9/7/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4233844 | Dreisinger et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4601467 | Gvoich et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4628910 | Krukowski | Dec 1986 | A |
4865315 | Paterson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4878663 | Luquette | Nov 1989 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
4976424 | Sargeant et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4976426 | Szabo et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5011142 | Eckler | Apr 1991 | A |
5027303 | Witte et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5207216 | Sweeny | May 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5242348 | Bates | Sep 1993 | A |
5267925 | Boyd | Dec 1993 | A |
5314390 | Westing et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328429 | Potash et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5374193 | Trachtman | Dec 1994 | A |
5410472 | Anderson | Apr 1995 | A |
5476428 | Potash et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5583403 | Anjanappa et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5722937 | Smith | Mar 1998 | A |
5807288 | Wu | Sep 1998 | A |
6152855 | Dean et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6234939 | Moser et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270445 | Dean et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6367352 | Niculescu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6456885 | Shiba et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 194 399 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0 255 487 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0255487 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0 255 487 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0 255 487 | Mar 1988 | EP |
1 259 299 | Oct 2005 | EP |
6-104191 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7-344507 | Oct 1998 | JP |
9-301472 | May 1999 | JP |
10-178358 | Jan 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030207734 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |