Some embodiments described herein relate to methods and apparatus for performing cardiac valve repairs, and more particularly, methods and apparatus for performing minimally invasive mitral or tricuspid valve repairs.
Various disease processes can impair the proper functioning of one or more of the valves of the heart. These disease processes include degenerative processes (e.g., Barlow's Disease, fibroelastic deficiency), inflammatory processes (e.g., Rheumatic Heart Disease), and infectious processes (e.g., endocarditis). Additionally, damage to the ventricle from prior heart attacks (i.e., myocardial infarction secondary to coronary artery disease) or other heart diseases (e.g., cardiomyopathy) can distort the valve's geometry causing it to dysfunction.
Mitral valve regurgitation occurs when the leaflets of the valve do not close completely thereby causing blood to leak back into the prior chamber. There are three mechanisms by which a valve becomes regurgitant or incompetent. The three mechanisms include Carpentier's type I, type II and type III malfunctions. A Carpentier type I malfunction involves the dilation of the annulus such that normally functioning leaflets are distracted from each other and fail to form a tight seal (i.e., do not coapt properly). Included in a type I mechanism malfunction are perforations of the valve leaflets, as in endocarditis. A Carpentier's type II malfunction involves prolapse of one or both leaflets above the plane of coaptation. This is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation, and is often caused by the stretching or rupturing of chordae tendineae normally connected to the leaflet. A Carpentier's type III malfunction involves restriction of the motion of one or more leaflets such that the leaflets are abnormally constrained below the level of the plane of the annulus. Leaflet restriction can be caused by rheumatic disease (IIIa) or dilation of the ventricle (IIIb).
Mitral valve disease is the most common valvular heart disorder, with nearly 4 million Americans estimated to have moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (“MR”). MR results in a volume overload on the left ventricle which in turn progresses to ventricular dilation, decreased ejection performance, pulmonary hypertension, symptomatic congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, right ventricular dysfunction and death. Successful surgical mitral valve repair restores mitral valve competence, abolishes the volume overload on the left ventricle, improves symptom status and prevents adverse left ventricular remodeling.
Malfunctioning valves may either be repaired or replaced. Repair typically involves the preservation and correction of the patient's own valve. Replacement typically involves replacing the patient's malfunctioning valve with a biological or mechanical substitute. Typically, replacement is preferred for stenotic damage sustained by the leaflets because the stenosis is irreversible. The mitral valve and tricuspid valve, on the other hand, are more prone to deformation. Deformation of the leaflets, as described above, prevents the valves from closing properly and allows for regurgitation or back flow from the ventricle into the atrium, which results in valvular insufficiency. Deformations in the structure or shape of the mitral valve or tricuspid valve are often repairable.
In mitral valve regurgitation, repair is preferable to valve replacement. Bioprosthetic valves have limited durability. Moreover, prosthetic valves rarely function as well as the patient's own valves. Additionally, there is an increased rate of survival and a decreased mortality rate and incidence of endocarditis for repair procedures. Further, because of the risk of thromboembolism, mechanical valves often require further maintenance, such as the lifelong treatment with blood thinners and anticoagulants. Therefore, an improperly functioning mitral valve or tricuspid valve is ideally repaired, rather than replaced. However, because of the complex and technical demands of the repair procedures, the mitral valve is still replaced in approximately one third of all mitral valve operations performed in the United States.
Carpentier type I malfunction, sometimes referred to as “Functional MR,” is associated with heart failure and affects between 1.6 and 2.8 million people in the United States alone. Studies have shown that mortality doubles in patients with untreated mitral valve regurgitation after myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, there is no gold standard surgical treatment paradigm for functional MR and most functional MR patients are not referred for surgical intervention due to the significant morbidity, risk of complications and prolonged disability associated with cardiac surgery. Surgeons use a variety of approaches ranging from valve replacement to insertion of an undersized mitral valve annuloplasty ring for patients suffering from functional MR and the long term efficacy is still unclear. Dr. Alfieri has demonstrated the benefit of securing the midpoint of both leaflets together creating a double orifice valve in patients with MR known as an “Edge-to-Edge” repair or an Alfieri procedure.
Regardless of whether a replacement or repair procedure is being performed, conventional approaches for replacing or repairing cardiac valves are typically invasive open-heart surgical procedures, such as sternotomy or thoracotomy, which require opening up of the thoracic cavity so as to gain access to the heart. Once the chest has been opened, the heart is bypassed and stopped. Cardiopulmonary bypass is typically established by inserting cannulae into the superior and inferior vena cavae (for venous drainage) and the ascending aorta (for arterial perfusion), and connecting the cannulae to a heart-lung machine, which functions to oxygenate the venous blood and pump it into the arterial circulation, thereby bypassing the heart. Once cardiopulmonary bypass has been achieved, cardiac standstill is established by clamping the aorta and delivering a “cardioplegia” solution into the aortic root and then into the coronary circulation, which stops the heart from beating. Once cardiac standstill has been achieved, the surgical procedure may be performed. These procedures, however, adversely affect almost all of the organ systems of the body and may lead to complications, such as strokes, myocardial “stunning” or damage, respiratory failure, kidney failure, bleeding, generalized inflammation, and death. The risk of these complications is directly related to the amount of time the heart is stopped (“cross-clamp time”) and the amount of time the subject is on the heart-lung machine (“pump time”).
Thus there is a significant need to perform mitral valve repairs using less invasive procedures while the heart is still beating. Accordingly, there is a continuing need for new procedures and devices for performing cardiac valve repairs, such as mitral valve repair, which are less invasive, do not require cardiac arrest, and are less labor-intensive and technically challenging.
Apparatus and methods for performing a non-invasive procedure to repair a cardiac valve are described herein. In some embodiments, apparatus and methods are described herein for repairing a mitral valve using an edge-to-edge procedure (also referred to as an Alfieri procedure) to secure the mitral valve leaflets. Implant securing devices are also described that can be used during a procedure to repair a mitral valve. In some embodiments, an implant securing device includes an outer member and an inner member movably disposed within the outer member. The inner member can be used to hold or secure a suture extending from an implant deployed on an atrial side of a leaflet of a mitral valve, and the outer member can be used to push or move a knot, such as a half-hitch, toward a ventricular side of the leaflet, which can be used to secure the implant in a desired position.
Apparatus and methods for performing a non-invasive procedure to repair a cardiac valve are described herein. In some embodiments, apparatus and methods are described herein for performing a non-invasive procedure for repairing a mitral valve using an edge-to-edge stitch (also referred to as an Alfieri procedure) to secure an implant to the mitral valve leaflets.
As illustrated in
Mitral valve regurgitation increases the workload on the heart and may lead to very serious conditions if left un-treated, such as endocarditis, congestive heart failure, permanent heart damage, cardiac arrest, and ultimately death. Since the left heart is primarily responsible for circulating the flow of blood throughout the body, malfunction of the mitral valve 22 is particularly problematic and often life threatening.
As described in detail in PCT International Application No. PCT/US2012/043761 (published as WO 2013/003228 A1) (referred to herein as “the '761 PCT Application), the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, methods and devices are provided for performing non-invasive procedures to repair a cardiac valve, such as a mitral valve. Such procedures include procedures to repair regurgitation that occurs when the leaflets of the mitral valve do not coapt at peak contraction pressures, resulting in an undesired back flow of blood from the ventricle into the atrium. As described in the '761 PCT Application, after the malfunctioning cardiac valve has been assessed and the source of the malfunction verified, a corrective procedure can be performed. Various procedures can be performed in accordance with the methods described therein to effectuate a cardiac valve repair, which will depend on the specific abnormality and the tissues involved.
In some embodiments, a method includes the implantation of one or more artificial chordae tendineae into one or more leaflets of a malfunctioning mitral valve 22 and/or tricuspid valve. It is to be noted that, although the following procedures are described with reference to repairing a cardiac mitral valve by the implantation of one or more artificial chordae, the methods presented are readily adaptable for various types of leaflet repair procedures. In general, the methods herein will be described with reference to a mitral valve 22.
After the implants 131, 131′ are in a desired position, for example, as confirmed with imaging, a securing device 140 as shown in
The inner member 146 can be used to hold a suture portion extending from the knot implant 131 and a suture portion extending from the knot implant 131′. For example,
During a procedure to repair a mitral valve, the suture portion 133 of the implant 131 and the suture portion 134 of the implant 131′ are threaded through the lumen 145 of the inner member 146 as shown in
After the half hitch knot has been formed, the outer member 144 can be moved distally to push the half hitch knot 155 distally until it contacts or is near the ventricular side of the leaflets 152, 154 as shown in 8. This process of tying half hitch knots and moving them distally toward the leaflets is repeated until a desired number of knots are formed and a stack or sequence of knots 157 is formed, as shown in
To form the half hitch knots on the suture portions 133 and 134, the outer member 144 of the securing device 140 can be used, or a separate, single lumen pushing device 160, as shown in
In some embodiments, in addition to securing the mitral valve implants (e.g., 131, 131′) with half hitch knots, or alternatively, it may be desirable to include a holding member to anchor the free, proximal ends of the suture portions. Examples of such anchoring devices are shown and described in the '761 PCT Application with reference to
In another embodiment, after implanting one or more bulky knot implants in each mitral valve leaflet, the terminal ends of all of the suture portions can be drawn through a tubular collar 442, as shown in
In some embodiments, the suture portions from one of the implants can be threaded through a tubular collar and the suture portions for the other implant can be used to tie half hitches to hold the collar in position. For example, the suture portions 133 and 134 can be threaded through the lumen of the collar 442, and the suture portions 132 and 135 can extend outside the collar 442. A half hitch can then be tied between, for example, suture portion 132 and suture portion 133, and a half hitch can be tied between suture portion 135 and suture 134, to hold the collar in place. In other words, half hitches are tied between a suture portion of one of the implants 131, 131′ and a suture portion of the other of the implants 131, 131′.
In another embodiment, after implanting one or more bulky knot implants in each mitral valve leaflet, the terminal ends of the suture portions of the bulky knot implants can be drawn through a two-lumen collar 542, as shown in
In alternatives to either of the two preceding embodiments, rather than being formed as a collar, the single- or two-lumen device can be formed as an elongate tube that is sufficiently long to extend from the mitral valve to, or through, the ventricular apex, and the tube and terminal ends of the implants can be secured at the apex using any suitable technique.
The above-described procedures can be performed manually, e.g., by a physician, or can alternatively be performed fully or in part with robotic assistance. In addition, although some embodiments described herein include the use of a collar to secure the terminal ends of the suture portions, it should be understood that any of the embodiments described herein can use such a collar in addition to, or alternatively to using half hitch knots. Further, although not specifically described for some embodiments, in various embodiments, the heart may receive rapid pacing to minimize the relative motion of the edges of the valve leaflets while knots are placed and secured.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Where methods described above indicate certain events occurring in certain order, the ordering of certain events may be modified. Additionally, certain of the events may be performed concurrently in a parallel process when possible, as well as performed sequentially as described above.
Where schematics and/or embodiments described above indicate certain components arranged in certain orientations or positions, the arrangement of components may be modified. While the embodiments have been particularly shown and described, it will be understood that various changes in form and details may be made. Any portion of the apparatus and/or methods described herein may be combined in any combination, except mutually exclusive combinations. The embodiments described herein can include various combinations and/or sub-combinations of the functions, components and/or features of the different embodiments described.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/584,561, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Transapical Procedures on a Mitral Valve,” filed Dec. 29, 2014, which claims priority to and the benefit from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/923,359, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Transapical Procedures on a Mitral Valve,” filed Jan. 3, 2014, each of the disclosures of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3131957 | Musto | May 1964 | A |
3752516 | Mumma | Aug 1973 | A |
4403797 | Ragland, Jr. | Sep 1983 | A |
5144961 | Chen et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5147316 | Castillenti | Sep 1992 | A |
5312423 | Rosenbluth et al. | May 1994 | A |
5391176 | de la Torre | Feb 1995 | A |
5405352 | Weston | Apr 1995 | A |
5454821 | Harm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472446 | de la Torre | Dec 1995 | A |
5507754 | Green et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5527323 | Jervis et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5554184 | Machiraju | Sep 1996 | A |
5626614 | Hart | May 1997 | A |
5643293 | Kogasaka et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5681331 | de la Torre et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5716368 | de la Torre et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727569 | Benetti et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728109 | Schulze et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746752 | Burkhart | May 1998 | A |
5769862 | Kammerer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797928 | Kogasaka | Aug 1998 | A |
5824065 | Gross | Oct 1998 | A |
5931868 | Gross | Aug 1999 | A |
5957936 | Yoon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971447 | Steck, III | Oct 1999 | A |
6010531 | Donlon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6074417 | Peredo | Jun 2000 | A |
6197035 | Loubens | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6269819 | Oz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6332893 | Mortier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6562051 | Bolduc et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6626930 | Allen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629534 | St. Goar et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6840246 | Downing | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6921408 | Sauer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6978176 | Lattouf | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991635 | Takamoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997950 | Chawla | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7291168 | Macoviak et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7294148 | McCarthy | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309086 | Carrier | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316706 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7373207 | Lattouf | May 2008 | B2 |
7431692 | Zollinger et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7513908 | Lattouf | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534260 | Lattouf | May 2009 | B2 |
7618449 | Tremulis et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632308 | Loulmet | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7635386 | Gammie | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7666196 | Miles | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7837727 | Goetz | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7871433 | Lattouf | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7959650 | Kaiser et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8029518 | Goldfarb et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8029565 | Lattouf | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043368 | Crabtree | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8147542 | Maisano et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8226711 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241304 | Bachman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252050 | Maisano et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8292884 | Levine et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303622 | Alkhatib | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8333788 | Maiorino | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8382829 | Call et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8439969 | Gillinov et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454656 | Tuval | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8475525 | Maisano et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500800 | Maisano et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8608758 | Singhatat et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8663278 | Mabuchi et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8771296 | Nobles et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8828053 | Sengun et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852213 | Gammie et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9131884 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020013571 | Goldfarb et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030023254 | Chiu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030094180 | Benetti | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105519 | Fasol et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120264 | Lattouf | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120341 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040044365 | Bachman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093023 | Allen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040199183 | Oz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050004667 | Swinford et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075654 | Kelleher | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119735 | Spence et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149067 | Takemoto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149093 | Pokorney | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154402 | Sauer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050216036 | Nakao | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216077 | Mathis et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050267493 | Schreck et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277966 | Ewers et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030866 | Schreck | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060100698 | Lattouf | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111739 | Staufer | May 2006 | A1 |
20060167541 | Lattouf | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190030 | To et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060207608 | Hirotsuka et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070010857 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049952 | Weiss | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118151 | Davidson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149995 | Quinn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070179530 | Tieu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197858 | Goldfarb et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213582 | Zollinger et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070270793 | Lattouf | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004597 | Lattouf et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009888 | Ewers et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080065203 | Khalapyan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140093 | Stone et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183194 | Goldfarb et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188893 | Selvitelli et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080249504 | Lattouf et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269781 | Funamura et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090005863 | Goetz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043153 | Zollinger et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090105729 | Zentgraf | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105751 | Zentgraf | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090276038 | Tremulis et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100023056 | Johansson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023117 | Yoganathan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023118 | Medlock | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042147 | Janovsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100174297 | Speziali | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179574 | Longoria et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210899 | Schankereli | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100298930 | Orlov | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110015476 | Franco | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022083 | DiMatteo et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022084 | Sengun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028995 | Miraki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029071 | Zlotnick et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060407 | Ketai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106106 | Meier | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144743 | Lattouf | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110264208 | Duffy et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270278 | Overes et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288637 | De Marchena | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120004669 | Overes et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120143215 | Carrao et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150223 | Manos et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179184 | Orlov | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120184971 | Zentgraf et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203072 | Lattouf et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226294 | Tuval | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226349 | Tuval et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130018459 | Maisano et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035757 | Zentgraf et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130197575 | Karapetian | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253641 | Lattouf | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130282059 | Ketai et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130345749 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012292 | Stewart | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031926 | Kudlik et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039607 | Kovach | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067052 | Chau et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114404 | Gammie et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140214152 | Bielefeld | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140243968 | Padala | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140364938 | Longoria et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150032127 | Gammie et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150045879 | Longoria et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150250590 | Gries et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160345956 | Sauer | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170156720 | Moehle et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0791330 | Jun 2005 | EP |
WO 1997047246 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 2006078694 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007100268 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008013869 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008124110 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008143740 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009081396 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2010070649 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010105046 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2012137208 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO 2013003228 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2014093861 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2015020816 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/683,282, dated Feb. 27, 2009, 6 pages. |
Neochord, Inc. v. University of Maryland, Baltimore, Case No. IPR2016-00208, Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.120, with Exhibits 1001-1011, filed Sep. 12, 2016, 299 pages. |
Neochord, Inc. v. University of Maryland, Baltimore, Case No. IPR2016-00208, Reply to Patent Owner's Response, with Exhibits 1012-1014, filed Nov. 28, 2016, 83 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 12804880.8, dated Nov. 28, 2014, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/138,857, dated May 5, 2014, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/478,325, dated Nov. 18, 2014, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/478,325, dated May 15, 2015, 15 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/478,325, dated Mar. 4, 2016, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/478,325, dated Aug. 17, 2016, 28 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/478,325, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 4 pages. |
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review for U.S. Appl. No. 14/478,325, mailed Dec. 16, 2016, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/043761, dated Dec. 3, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/043761, dated Jan. 16, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,561, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 5 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2016/055170, dated Jan. 9, 2017, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/059900, dated Apr. 7, 2017, 11 pages. |
Alfieri, O. et al., “The double-orifice technique in mitral valve repair: a simple solution for complex problems,” (2001) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 122(4):674-681. |
Barbero-Marcial, M. et al., “Transxiphoid Approach Without Median Sternotomy for the Repair of Atrial Septal Defects,” (1998) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 65(3):771-774. |
Braunberger, E. et al., “Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier's techniques in nonheumatic mitral valve insufficiency,” (2001) Circulation, 104:I-8-I-11. |
Carpentier, Alain, “Cardiac valve surgery—the‘French correction’,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 86, No. 3, Sep. 1983, 15 pages. |
David, T. E. et al., “Replacement of chordae tendineae with Gore-Tex sutures: a ten-year experience,” (1996) J. Heart Valve Dis., 5(4):352-355. |
David, T. E. et al., “Mitral valve repair by replacement of chordae tendineae with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures,” (1991) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 101(3):495-501. |
Doty, D, B. et al., “Full-Spectrum Cardiac Surgery Through a Minimal Incision: Mini-Sternotomy (Lower Half) Technique,” (1998) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 65(2):573-577. |
Duran, C. M. G. et al., “Techniques for ensuring the correct length of new mitral chords,” (2003) J. Heart Valve Dis., 12(2):156-161. |
Eishi, K. et al., “Long-term results of artificial chordae implantation in patients with mitral valve prolapse,” (1997) J. Heart Valve Dis., 6(6):594-598. |
Frater, R. W. M., “Anatomical rules for the plastic repair of a diseased mitral valve,” (1964) Thorax, 19:458-464. |
Frater, R. W. M. et al., “Chordal replacement in mitral valve repair,” (1990) Circulation, 82(suppl. IV):IV-125-IV-130. |
Huber, C. H. et al., “Direct Access Valve Replacement (DAVR)—are we entering a new era in cardiac surgery?” (2006) European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 29:380-385. |
Hvass, U. et al., “Papillary Muscle Sling: A New Functional Approach to Mitral Repair in Patients With Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Functional Mitral Regurgitation,” (2003) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 75:809-811. |
Kasegawa, H. et al., “Simple method for determining proper length of artificial chordae in mitral valve repair,” (1994) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 57(1):237-239. |
Kobayashi, J. et al., “Ten-year experience of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in mitral valve repair,” (2000) Circulation, 102(19 Suppl 3):Iii-30-Iii-34. |
Kunzelman, K. et al., “Replacement of mitral valve posterior chordae tendineae with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suture: a finite element study,” (1996) J. Card. Surg., 11(2):136-145. |
Langer, F. et al., “RING plus STRING: Papillary muscle repositioning as an adjunctive repair technique for ischemic mitral regurgitation,” (2007) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 133(1): 247-249. |
Maisano, F. et al., “The double-orifice technique as a standardized approach to treat mitral regurgitation due to severe myxomatous disease: surgical technique,” (2000) European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 17(3):201-205. |
Merendino, K. A. et al., “The open correction of rheumatic mitral regurgitation and/or stenosis with special reference to regurgitation treated by posteromedial annuloplasty utilizing a pump-oxygenator,” (1959) Annals of Surgery, 150(1):5-22. |
Minatoya, K. et al., “Pathologic aspects of polytetrafluoroethylene sutures in human heart,” (1996) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 61(3):883-887. |
Mohty, D. et al., “Very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse,” (2001) Circulation, 104:I-1-I-7. |
Neochord, Inc. v. University of Maryland, Baltimore, Case No. IPR2016-00208, Petition for Inter PartesReview of U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,386, dated Nov. 18, 2015, 65 pages. |
Neochord, Inc. v. University of Maryland, Baltimore, Case No. IPR2016-00208, Declaration of Dr. Lishan Aklog, dated Nov. 17, 2015, 91 pages. |
Neochord, Inc. v. University of Maryland, Baltimore, Case No. IPR2016-00208, Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review,37 CFR §42.108, Paper 6, Entered May 24, 2016, 28 pages. |
Nigro, J. J. et al., “Neochordal repair of the posterior mitral leaflet,” (2004) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 127(2):440-447. |
Phillips, M. R. et al., “Repair of anterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: chordal replacement versus chordal shmtening,” (2000) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 69(1):25-29. |
Russo, M. J. et al. “Transapical Approach for Mitral Valve Repair during Insertion of a Left Ventricular Assist Device,” Hindawi Publishing Corporation, The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 925310, [online], Retrieved from the internet: <URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/925310> Apr. 11, 2013, 4 pages. |
Sarsam, M. A. I., “Simplified technique for determining the length of artificial chordae in mitral valve repair,” (2002) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 73(5):1659-1660. |
Savage, E. B. et al., “Use of mitral valve repair: analysis of contemporary United States experience reported to the society of thoracic surgeons national cardiac database,” (2003) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 75:820-825. |
Speziali, G. et al., “Correction of Mitral Valve Regurgitation by Off-Pump, Transapical Placement of Artificial Chordae Tendinae, Results of the European TACT Trial,” AATS 93rd Annual Meeting 2013, www.aats.org, 26 pages. |
Suematsu, Y. et al., “Three-dimensional echo-guided beating heart surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass: Atrial septal defect closure in a swine model,” (2005) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 130:1348-1357. |
Von Oppell, U. O. et al., “Chordal replacement for both minimally invasive and conventional mitral valve surgery using premeasured Gore-Tex loops,” (2000) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 70(6):2166-2168. |
Zussa, C., “Artificial chordae,” (1995) J. Heart Valve Dis., 4(2):S249-S256. |
Zussa, C. et al., “Artificial mitral valve chordae: experimental and clinical experience,” (1990) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 50(3):367-373. |
Zussa, C. et al., “Seven-year experience with chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in floppy mitral valve,” (1994) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 108(1):37-41. |
Zussa, C. et al., “Surgical technique for artificial mitral chordae implantation,” (1991) Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 6(4):432-438. |
Examination Report for European Application No. 12804880.8, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 4 pages. |
Examiner's Answer, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Appl. No. 14/478,325, dated Jun. 15, 2017, 10 pages. |
Banieghbal, B., “Extracorporeal “Giant” Locking Sliding Knot in Pediatric and Neonatal Minimally Invasive Surgery: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 19, No. 6, 2009, pp. 831-834. |
Reul, G. J., Jr., “Use of a new polybutilate-coated polyester suture in cardiovascular surgery,” Cardiovascular Diseases, Bulletin of the Texas Heart Institute, 1977; 4(1): 61-68. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170258464 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61923359 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14584561 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 15606510 | US |