The present invention is related to the following Applications for Patent in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office:
The present invention relates to wireless communication systems generally and specifically, to methods and apparatus for message compression in preparation for transmission in a wireless communication system.
There is an increasing demand for packetized data services over wireless communication systems. As traditional wireless communication systems are designed for voice communications, the extension to support data services introduces many challenges. The conservation of bandwidth is the overwhelming concern for most designers
The transmission protocols and data preparation methods used for a bi-directional communication may not be optimum for a uni-directional service, such as a broadcast service, wherein the bi-directional communication requires information not used in the unit-directional transmission. There is a need, therefore, for an efficient and accurate method of uni-directional transmission in a wireless communication system.
Embodiments disclosed herein address the above stated needs by providing a method for framing data packets in a data processing system.
In one aspect, a method for framing packets in a wireless transmission system supporting broadcast transmissions includes generating a portion of an Internet Protocol (IP) packet for transmission, appending a start of frame indicator to the portion of the IP packet, applying an error checking mechanism to the portion of the IP packet, preparing a frame for transmission, having the start of frame indicator, the portion of the IP packet, and the error checking mechanism, and transmitting the frame without protocol information.
In another aspect, a communication signal transmitted via a carrier wave, having a payload portion corresponding to at least a portion of an Internet Protocol (IP) packet of digital information, a start of frame portion corresponding to the payload portion, and identifying a status of the payload portion within an IP packet, and an error checking portion for verifying the payload portion.
In still another aspect, a method for receiving framed packets in a wireless transmission system supporting broadcast transmissions includes receiving a frame of a packet transmission, the frame having a start of frame portion, a payload portion, and an error check portion, the frame not including protocol information, identifying the frame as a start frame in the packet transmission, verifying the frame using the error check portion of the frame, and processing the payload portion of the frame.
In yet another aspect, a computer program stored on a computer-readable storage unit, the computer program for receiving framed packets in a wireless transmission system supporting broadcast transmissions, the computer program includes a first set of instructions for receiving a frame of a packet transmission, the frame having a start of frame portion, a payload portion, and an error check portion, the frame not including protocol information, a second set of instructions for identifying the frame as a start frame in the packet transmission, a third set of instructions for verifying the frame using the error check portion of the frame, and a fourth set of instructions for processing the payload portion of the frame.
The word “exemplary” is used exclusively herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments.
Optimization of a system consistent with the broadcast service is desirable in a wireless communication system to conserve a critical resource: the available bandwidth. The efficient use of available bandwidth impacts the performance and breadth of the system. Toward that end, various techniques have been applied to reduce the size of overhead information transmitted along with the data or content information as well as to reduce the size of the data transmitted. For example, in a digital transmission, data is transmitted in frames. The frames may be part of a packet of data, part of a data message, or continuous frames in a stream of information, such as audio and/or video streams. Attached to each frame of data (and each packet or message) is a header containing processing information that allows the receiver to understand the information contained in the frame(s). This header information is considered overhead, i.e., processing information transmitted along with information content. The information content is referred to as the payload. While each individual header is typically much smaller than a given payload, the cumulative effect of transmitting headers impacts the available bandwidth.
An exemplary embodiment of a wireless communication system employs a method of framing that reduces the size of the frame while satisfying the accuracy and transmission requirements of the system. The exemplary embodiment supports a unidirectional broadcast service. The broadcast service provides video and/or audio streams to multiple users. Subscribers to the broadcast service “tune in” to a designated channel to access the broadcast transmission. As the bandwidth requirement for high speed transmission of video broadcasts is great, it is desirable to reduce the size of any overhead associated with such broadcast transmission.
The following discussion develops the exemplary embodiment by first presenting a spread-spectrum wireless communication system generally. Next, the broadcast service is introduced; wherein the service is referred to as High Speed Broadcast Service (HSBS), and the discussion includes channel assignments of the exemplary embodiment. A subscription model is then presented including options for paid subscriptions, free subscriptions, and hybrid subscription plans, similar to those currently available for television transmissions. The specifics of accessing the broadcast service are then detailed, presenting the use of a service option to define the specifics of a given transmission. The message flow in the broadcast system is discussed with respect to the topology of the system, i.e., infrastructure elements. Finally, the header compression used in the exemplary embodiment is discussed
Note that the exemplary embodiment is provided as an exemplar throughout this discussion; however, alternate embodiments may incorporate various aspects without departing from the scope of the present invention. Specifically, the present invention is applicable to a data processing system, a wireless communication system, a unidirectional broadcast system, and any other system desiring efficient transmission of information.
Wireless Communication System
The exemplary embodiment employs a spread-spectrum wireless communication system, supporting a broadcast service. Wireless communication systems are widely deployed to provide various types of communication such as voice, data, and so on. These systems may be based on code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), or some other modulation techniques. A CDMA system provides certain advantages over other types of system, including increased system capacity.
A system may be designed to support one or more standards such as the “TIA/EIA/IS-95-B Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System” referred to herein as the IS-95 standard, the standard offered by a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” referred to herein as 3GPP, and embodied in a set of documents including Document Nos. 3G TS 25.211, 3G TS 25.212, 3G TS 25.213, and 3G TS 25.214, 3G TS 25.302, referred to herein as the W-CDMA standard, the standard offered by a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” referred to herein as 3GPP2, and TR-45.5 referred to herein as the cdma2000 standard, formerly called IS-2000 MC. The standards cited hereinabove are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Each standard specifically defines the processing of data for transmission from base station to mobile, and vice versa. As an exemplary embodiment the following discussion considers a spread-spectrum communication system consistent with the CDMA200 standard of protocols. Alternate embodiments may incorporate another standard. Still other embodiments may apply the compression methods disclosed herein to other types of data processing systems.
Terminals 106 in the coverage area may be fixed (i.e., stationary) or mobile. As Shown in
The downlink, or FL, refers to transmission from the base station to the terminal, and the uplink, or RL, refers to transmission from the terminal in the base station. In the exemplary embodiment, some of terminals 106 have multiple receive antennas and others have only one receive antenna. In
High Speed Broadcast System (HSBS)
A wireless communication system 200 is illustrated in
In a given sector, there are several ways in which the HSBS broadcast service may be deployed. The factors involved in designing a system include, but are not limited to, the number of HSBS sessions supported, the number of frequency assignments, and the number of broadcast physical channels supported.
The HSBS is a stream of information provided over an air interface in a wireless communication system. The “HSBS channel” to refer to a single logical HSBS broadcast session as defined by broadcast content. Note that the content of a given HSBS channel may change with time, e.g., 7 am News, 8 am Weather, 9 am Movies, ect. The time based scheduling is analogous to a single TV channel. The “Broadcast channel” refers to a single forward link physical channel i.e., a given Walsh Code, that carreies broadcast traffic. The Broadcast Channel, BCH, corresponds to a signal CDM channel.
The HSBS is a stream of information provided over an air interface in a wireless communication system. The “HSBS channel” refers to a single logical HSBS broadcast session as defined by broadcast content. Note that the content of a given HSBS channel may change with time, e.g., 7 am News, 8 am Weather, 9 am Movies, etc. The time based scheduling is analogous to a single TV channel. The “Broadcast channel” refers to a single forward link physical channel, i.e., a given Walsh Code, that carries broadcast traffic. The Broadcast Channel, BCH, corresponds to a single CDM channel.
According to the exemplary embodiment, the system 100 illustrated in
According to the exemplary embodiment, a service provider is referred to as a Content Server (CS), wherein the CS advertises the availability of such high-speed broadcast service to the system users. Any user desiring to receive the HSBS service may subscribe with the CS. The subscriber is then able to scan the broadcast service schedule in a variety of ways that may be provided by the CS. For example, the broadcast content may be communicated through advertisements, Short Management System (SMS) messages, Wireless Application Protocol (WAP), and/or some other means generally consistent with and convenient for mobile wireless communications. Mobile users are referred to as Mobile Stations (MSs). Base Stations (BSs) transmit HSBS related parameters in overhead messages, such as those transmitted on channels and/or frequencies designated for control and information, i.e., non-payload messages. Payload refers to the information content of the transmission, wherein for a broadcast session the payload is the broadcast content, i.e., the video program, etc. When a broadcast service subscriber desires to receive a broadcast session, i.e., a particular broadcast scheduled program, the MS reads the overhead messages and learns the appropriate configurations. The MS then tunes to the frequency containing the HSBS channel, and receives the broadcast service content.
The channel structure of the exemplary embodiment is consistent with the cdma2000 standard, wherein the Forward Supplemental Channel (F-SCH) supports data transmissions. One embodiment bundles a large number of the Forward Fundamental Channels (F-FCHs) or the Forward Dedicated Control Channels (F-DCCHs) to achieve the higher data rate requirements of data services. The exemplary embodiment utilizes an F-SCH as the basis for the F-BSCH supporting a payload of 64 kbps (excluding RTP overhead). The F-BSCH may also be modified to support other payload rates, for example, by subdividing the 64-kbps payload rate into sub-streams of lower rates.
One embodiment also supports group calls in several different ways. For example, by using existing unicast channels, i.e., one forward link channel per MS with no sharing, of F-FCH (or the F-DCCH) on both forward and reverse links. In another example, the F-SCH (shared by group members in the same sector) and the F-DCCH (no frames but the Forward Power Control Subchannel most of the time) on the forward link and the R-DCCH on the reverse link are applied. In still another example, the high-rate F-BSCH on the forward link and the Access Channel (or the Enhanced Access Channel/Reverse Common Control Channel combination) on the reverse link is utilized.
Having a high data rate, the F-BSCH of the exemplary embodiment may use a very large portion of a base station's forward link power to provide adequate coverage. The physical layer design of HSBC is thus focused on efficiency improvements in a broadcast environment.
To provide adequate support for video services, system design considers the required base station power for various ways to transmit the channel as well as the corresponding video quality. One aspect of the design is a subjective trade-off between the perceived video quality at the edge of coverage and that close to the cell site. As the payload rate is reduced, the effective error correcting code rate is increased, a given level of base station transmit power would provide better coverage at the edge of the cell. For mobile stations located closer to the base stations, the reception of the channel remains error-free and the video quality would be lowered due to the lowered source rate. This same trade-off also applies to other, non-video applications that the F-BSCH can support. Lowering the payload rate supported by the channel increases the coverage at the expense of decreased download speed for these applications. The balancing the relative importance between video quality and data throughput versus coverage is objective. The configuration chosen seeks an application-specific optimized configuration, and a good compromise among all possibilities.
The payload rate for the F-BSCH is an important design parameter. The following assumptions may be used in designing a system supporting broadcast transmissions according to the exemplary embodiment: (1) the target payload rate is 64 kbps, which provides an acceptable video quality for SKT; (2) for streaming video services, the payload rate is assumed to include the 12 8-bit bytes per packet overhead of the RTP packets; (3) the average overhead for all layers between RTP and the physical layer is approximately 64, 8-bit bytes per packet plus 8 bits per F-SCH frame overhead used by the MUXPDU header.
In the exemplary embodiment, for non-video broadcast services, the maximum rate supported is 64 kbps. However, many other possible payload rates below 64 kbps are also achievable.
Subscription Model
There are several possible subscription/revenue models for HSBS service, including free access, controlled access, and partially controlled access. For free access, no subscription is needed by the to receive the service. The BS broadcasts the content without encryption and interested mobiles can receive the content. The revenue for the service provider can be generated through advertisements that may also be transmitted in the broadcast channel. For example, upcoming movie-clips can be transmitted for which the studios will pay the service provider.
There are several possible subscription/revenue models for HSBS service, including free access, controlled access, and partially controlled access. For free access, no subscription is needed by the user to receive the service. The BS broadcasts the content without encryption and interested mobiles can receive the content. The revenue for the service provider can be generated through advertisements that may also be transmitted in the broadcast channel. For example, upcoming movie-clips can be transmitted for which the studios will pay the service provider.
A hybrid access scheme, referred to as partial controlled access, provides the HSBS service as a subscription-based service that is encrypted with intermittent unencrypted advertisement transmissions. These advertisements may be intended to encourage subscriptions to the encrypted HSBS service. Schedule of these unencrypted segments could be known to the MS through external means.
HSBS Service Option
The HSBS service option is defined by: (1) a protocol stack; (2) options in the protocol stack; and (3) procedures for setting up and synchronizing the service. The protocol stack according to the exemplary embodiment is illustrated in
Continuing with
Message Flow
Continuing with
At time t2 the MS tunes into the broadcast channel and starts to receive packets. At this point in time, the MS is unable to process the received packets because the IP/ESP header is compressed via ROHC, and the MS's decompressor has not been initialized. The PDSN provides header compression information (detailed hereinbelow) at time t3. From the ROHC packet header, the MS detects and obtains a ROHC Initialization & Refresh (IR) packet sent periodically from the PDSN to the broadcast channel. The ROHC IR packet is used to initialize the state of decompressor in the MS, allowing it to decompress the IP/ESP header of the received packets. The MS is then able to process the IP/ESP header of the received packets, however, the MS requires further information to process the ESP payload as the payload is encrypted with a Short-term Key (SK) at the CS. The SK acts in coordination with the BAK, wherein the SK is decrypted at the receiver using the BAK. The CS provides further encryption information, such as updated key information or a current SK at time t4. Note that the CS provides this information periodically to the MS to ensure the ongoing security of the broadcast. At time t5 the MS receives the broadcast content from the CS. Note that alternate embodiments may incorporate alternate compression and decompression methods that provide efficient transmission of the header information. Additionally, alternate embodiments may implement a variety of security schemes to protect the broadcast content. Still alternate embodiments may provide a non-secure broadcast service. The MS uses the encryption information, such as the SK, to decrypt and display broadcast content.
Compression
According to the exemplary embodiment, broadcast content is transmitted on a dedicated broadcast channel. The transport layer provides encryption overhead for carrying broadcast content in IP packets. The system supports data compression, and specifically header compression. The decision to compress data depends on the required average throughput (including transport/encryption overhead, data link layer overhead, and physical layer overhead) and user perception of the broadcast quality. Carrying more broadcast content in each IP packet reduces overhead and thus reduces the broadcast channel bandwidth. In contrast, compression increases the Packet Error Rate (PER) that affects user perception. This is due to the transmission of each long IP packet spanning multiple physical layer frames and thus is associated with increases in the Frame Error Rate (FER). If a carrier decides to use small IP packets to improve broadcast quality, the carrier may choose header compression to reduce the transport and encryption overhead of the IP packet.
The RTP/UDP/IP protocols are used to transport broadcast content from the CS to MS, and the content is protected by the Encapsulation Security Payload (ESP) in transport mode. The transport overhead is the RTP/UDP/IP header and is 40 bytes per IP packet data. The encryption overhead is in the form of ESP header, Initialization Vector (IV), and ESP trailer. The ESP header and IV are inserted between the IP header and UDP header. The ESP header consists of the Security Parameter Index (SPI) (4 bytes) and Sequence Number (4 bytes). The length of IV is specific to which encryption algorithm is used. For the AES Cipher Algorithm, the length of IV is 16 byte. The ESP trailer is appended to the end of the UDP datagram and consists of the padding, next header (1 byte), and padding length (1 byte). Since the cipher block size of the AES algorithm is 16 bytes, the padding size ranges from 0 to 15 bytes. Taking the ceiling function of the average padding size yields 8 bytes. For an IP packet the total overhead due to transport and encryption ranges from 66 to 81 bytes with the average of 74 bytes not including the data link layer overhead from the PDSN to the MS.
Header compression such as the Robust Header Compression (ROHC) may be used to reduce the IP header and the SPI field of the ESP Header from 24 bytes to 2 bytes. The Sequence Number of the ESP header is not compressed, because it is used to sequence the compressed packets. The IV is not compressed, because it changes randomly for every packet. The UDP/RTP header and ESP trailer cannot be compressed because they are encrypted. Therefore, if ROHC is used to compress the IP/ESP header, the average overhead due to transport and encryption is reduced from 74 bytes to 52 bytes per IP packet.
According to the exemplary embodiment, header compression, such as the Robust Header Compression (ROHC), is applied so as to avoid propagating decompression errors. As illustrated in
Note that ROHC may be operated in a unidirectional mode, wherein, packets are sent in one direction only: from compressor to decompressor. In this mode, therefore, makes ROHC usable over links wherein a return path from decompressor to compressor is unavailable or undesirable. Before the MS can decompress packets received from the broadcast channel, the state of decompressor is initialized. The Initialization & Refresh (IR) packet is used for this purpose. There are two alternatives for the ROHC initialization.
The subscriber “tunes” to the broadcast channel and waits for the ROHC IR packets periodically sent by the ROHC compressor in the PDSN. Frequent ROHC IR packets may be needed for the MS to start decompressing received packets quickly. Frequent ROHC IR packets may use too much bandwidth in the broadcast channel. An IR packet is about 30 bytes for the IP/ESP compression profile. If an IR packet is sent once every 250 ms., the process consumes about 1 kbps in the broadcast channel. Losing IR packets over the air would further delay the MS to acquire ROHC initialization.
If decompression goes out-of-sync, due to packet loss, or residual error in the received compressed header, or failure, etc., the resultant decompression error may propagate until decompression is re-synchronized or re-initialized. An ROHC compressed header contains a Cyclic Redundant Check (CRC), which is calculated over the entire header before compression. This CRC allows decompression to perform a local context repair that brings the context in sync (in the events of packet loss and residual error). When decompression recovers from a failure, periodic IR packets effectively reinitialize the decompression process.
Data Link Layer
A data link layer framing protocol or transport layer protocol is applied between the PDSN and the MS to delineate packets received from the broadcast channel. With reference to
The exemplary embodiment applies a version of HDLC framing that applies a subset of the HDLC defined parameters.
In particular, the HDLC protocol is considered processor intensive as further processing is used to ensure the payload does not include the same sequence of bits as the FLAG. At the transmitter, if a FLAG sequence of bits is detected in the payload, an escape character is inserted into the payload to identify the FLAG as part of the payload and not indicating a start of frame. The process of adding an escape character is referred to as “escaping” hexadecimal patterns of 0x7E and 0x7D in the frame payload. An alternative method referred to as the Efficient Framing Protocol that is less processor intensive than the HDLC-like framing is described hereinbelow.
Continuing with
The octet stuffing procedure defined in RFC 1662 is also applied to the exemplary embodiment, wherein after the FCS computation, the HDLC transmitter in the PDSN examines each byte in the HDLC frame (excluding the Flag) for the patterns of 0x7E and 0x7D. The pattern 0x7E will be encoded as 0x7D and 0x5E, and the pattern 0x7D will be encoded as 0x7D and 0×5D. The HDLC transmitter will not encode any other patterns. This implies that the Async-Control-Character-Map (ACCM) as defined in RFC 1662 is set to all zero.
The HDLC framing overhead is 3 bytes plus the octet stuffing overhead. Assuming the byte pattern is uniformly distributed, the average octet stuffing overhead is one byte per 128-byte of HDLC frame. For example, if the payload is 256 bytes, the HDLC framing overhead is 5 bytes on the average.
An alternative embodiment incorporates a framing protocol that does not use the octet based HDLC-like framing used seeking to avoid the processor intensive operations which use octet stuffing (referred to as “escaping”). Instead, this alternative uses a packet-based framing layer which is less processor intensive and is referred to herein as the “efficient framing protocol.”
As illustrated, process 2000 includes several sub-layers of processing, including an integrity layer and a packing layer. The integrity layer forms an integrity layer payload portion 2006 from the IP layer packet 2002 and appends a trailer 2008. In one embodiment, the integrity layer payload portion 2006 includes the IP layer packet 2002; however, alternate embodiments may include a portion of the IP layer packet 2002 or multiple IP layer packets 2002, or any combination thereof. The trailer 2008 may be the integrity checking mechanism.
The integrity layer appends an integrity check field or trailer 2008 to each IP layer packet 2002, i.e. packets received from the upper layer which in this case is the IP layer. The integrity layer then passes the resulting integrity layer packets 2006, 2008 to a lower layer, which in this case is the packing layer. The packets are further processed to form the framing layer packets 2016 and transmitted via the physical layer. At the receiver, packets are received via the physical layer and provided to the higher layers. The integrity layer at the receiver processes the integrity checking mechanism, i.e., trailer, and thus allows the receiver to validate the integrity of packets received from the lower layer before passing them to the upper layer. The format of the integrity layer is illustrated in
Continuing with
The packing layer packs variable length packets received from the upper layer (e.g., the integrity layer) into fixed length packing layer packets 2016 and passes the resulting packing layer packets 2016 to a lower layer (e.g., the physical layer). The packing layer allows the receiver to determine upper layer packet boundaries.
Continuing with
Access Network
A general access network topology for a system 1000 is illustrated in
The PDSN 1004 determines the number of individual users in the active set that are in the destination subscription group and duplicates the frame received from the CS 1002 for each of those users. The PDSN 1004 determines the PCF(s) corresponding to each of the users in the subscription group. The PDSN 1004 then appends an outer header, H2, to each of the prepared frames, wherein H2 identifies a PCF. The PDSN 1004 then transmits the frames to the PCF(s). The transmission from the PDSN 1004 includes the original payload, the header H1, and the Header H2. As illustrated, the PDSN 1004 sends N transmission frames to PCF11006 and sends M transmission frames to PCF21008. The N transmission frames correspond to N users in the subscription group serviced via PCF11006 and the M transmission frames correspond to M users in the subscription group serviced via PCF21008. In this scenario, the PDSN 1004 duplicates received frames any number of times for transmission to the corresponding subscribers.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the broadcast CS sends IP packets containing encrypted broadcast content to a multicast group identified by a class-D multicast IP address. This address is used in the destination address field of the IP packets. A given PDSN 1024 participates in multicast routing of these packets. After header compression, the PDSN 1024 places each packet in an HDLC frame for transmission. The HDLC frame is encapsulated by a Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) packet. The key field of the GRE packet header uses a special value to indicate a broadcast bearer connection. The GRE packet is appended with the 20-byte IP packet header having a source address field identifying the IP address of the PDSN 1024, and destination address field uses a class-D multicast IP address. It is recommended that this multicast IP address is different from the one used by the broadcast CS. The system 1020 configures at least one multicast routing table of the respective PCFs and PDSNs. The packets delivered in the broadcast connection are provided in sequence; in the exemplary embodiment the GRE sequencing feature is enabled. Duplication of the IP multicast packets is done in multicast-capable routers.
In an exemplary embodiment, each PCF is further coupled to a BSC (not shown), wherein a given BSC may duplicate the packets and send them to another BSC. The chaining of BSCs yields better soft handoff performance. The anchoring BSC yields better soft handoff performance. The anchoring BSC duplicates the transmission frame and sends it with the same time-stamp to its adjacent BSCs. The time-stamp information is critical to the soft handoff operation as the mobile station receives transmission frames from different BSCs.
Those of skill in the art would understand that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or any combination thereof.
Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The present Application for Patent claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60,279,970, filed 60/279,970, filed Mar. 28, 2001 assigned to The assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4163255 | Pires | Jul 1979 | A |
4323921 | Guillou | Apr 1982 | A |
4336612 | Inoue et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4750167 | Meyer | Jun 1988 | A |
4870408 | Zdunek et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4881263 | Herbison et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4901307 | Gilhousen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
RE33189 | Lee et al. | Mar 1990 | E |
4924513 | Herbison et al. | May 1990 | A |
5052000 | Wang et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5056109 | Gilhousen et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5101501 | Gilhousen et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103459 | Gilhousen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5117457 | Comerford et al. | May 1992 | A |
5136586 | Greenblatt | Aug 1992 | A |
5150412 | Maru | Sep 1992 | A |
5159447 | Haskell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5164988 | Matyas et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5235631 | Grube et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237612 | Raith | Aug 1993 | A |
5239584 | Hershey et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241598 | Raith | Aug 1993 | A |
5253294 | Maurer | Oct 1993 | A |
5257396 | Auld, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5325357 | Kimoto et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5351087 | Christopher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353332 | Raith et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363379 | Eckenrode et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365572 | Saegusa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369784 | Nelson | Nov 1994 | A |
5371794 | Diffie et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5404563 | Green et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410602 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412655 | Yamada et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421006 | Jablon et al. | May 1995 | A |
5442626 | Wei | Aug 1995 | A |
5448568 | Delpuch et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5467398 | Pierce et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473609 | Chaney | Dec 1995 | A |
5473642 | Osawa | Dec 1995 | A |
5481613 | Ford et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485577 | Eyer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5504773 | Padovani et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513245 | Mizikovsky et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515441 | Faucher | May 1996 | A |
5537474 | Brown et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5565909 | Thibadeau et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579393 | Conner et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592470 | Rudrapatna et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5659556 | Denissen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673259 | Quick, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5686963 | Uz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5708961 | Hylton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5729540 | Wegrzyn | Mar 1998 | A |
5748736 | Mittra | May 1998 | A |
5751707 | Voit et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751725 | Chen | May 1998 | A |
5758068 | Brandt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758291 | Grube et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768276 | Diachina et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774496 | Butler et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778059 | Loghmani et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778069 | Thomlinson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778187 | Monteiro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787172 | Arnold | Jul 1998 | A |
5787347 | Yu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796829 | Newby et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835730 | Grossman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850444 | Rune | Dec 1998 | A |
5850445 | Chan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870474 | Wasilewski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878141 | Daly et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881368 | Grob et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884196 | Lekven et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887252 | Noneman | Mar 1999 | A |
5909491 | Luo | Jun 1999 | A |
5915024 | Kitaori et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923649 | Raith | Jul 1999 | A |
5936965 | Doshi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940507 | Cane et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946316 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956404 | Schneier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956681 | Yamakita | Sep 1999 | A |
5970072 | Gammenthaler, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970417 | Toyryla et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978386 | Haemaelaeinen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983099 | Yao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983388 | Friedman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990928 | Sklar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991400 | Kamperman | Nov 1999 | A |
5991407 | Murto | Nov 1999 | A |
6006073 | Glauner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014765 | Maeda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018360 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021124 | Haartsen | Feb 2000 | A |
6026165 | Marino et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032197 | Birdwell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044154 | Kelly | Mar 2000 | A |
6047071 | Shah | Apr 2000 | A |
6047395 | Zook | Apr 2000 | A |
6052812 | Chen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055236 | Nessett et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055314 | Spies et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058289 | Gardner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065061 | Blahut et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067290 | Paulraj et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073122 | Wool | Jun 2000 | A |
6081907 | Witty et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097817 | Bilgic et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6098878 | Dent et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108424 | Pitiot | Aug 2000 | A |
6108706 | Birdwell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111866 | Kweon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122763 | Pyndiah et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128389 | Chan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128490 | Shaheen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128735 | Goldstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148010 | Sutton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148400 | Arnold | Nov 2000 | A |
6157719 | Wasilewski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172972 | Birdwell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185430 | Yee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195546 | Leung et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199161 | Ahvenainen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201961 | Schindall et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208634 | Boulos et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230024 | Wang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233234 | Curry et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233341 | Riggins | May 2001 | B1 |
6240091 | Ginzboorg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253069 | Mankovitz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253326 | Lincke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256509 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266420 | Langford et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272632 | Carman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6295361 | Kadansky et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6310661 | Arsenault | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314095 | Loa | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343280 | Clark | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6345307 | Booth | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353614 | Borella et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363242 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363480 | Perlman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366776 | Wright et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373829 | Vilmur | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374103 | Kamel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377810 | Geiger et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385200 | Erami et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385461 | Raith | May 2002 | B1 |
6408001 | Chuah et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415312 | Boivie | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424717 | Pinder et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424947 | Tsuria et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434367 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449491 | Dailey | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456716 | Arnold | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460156 | Laukkanen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463155 | Akiyama et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473419 | Gray et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473858 | Shimomura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477377 | Backstrom et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490259 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493761 | Baker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502140 | Boivie | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507590 | Terho et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510515 | Raith | Jan 2003 | B1 |
RE38007 | Tsukamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | E |
6519266 | Manning et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523069 | Luczycki et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529740 | Ganucheau, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536041 | Knudson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538996 | West et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539242 | Bayley | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542490 | Ahmadvand et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542504 | Mahler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549771 | Chang et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560206 | Naden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564211 | Andreev et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567914 | Just et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571109 | Kim | May 2003 | B1 |
6574211 | Padovani et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577734 | Etzel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577848 | Gregg et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580756 | Matsui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598203 | Tang | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600745 | Chopping | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601068 | Park | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603857 | Batten-Carew et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606706 | Li | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6608841 | Koodli | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614804 | McFadden et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633979 | Smeets | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640094 | Tabeta | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647000 | Persson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654384 | Reza et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658463 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658605 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665718 | Chuah et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678856 | Jordan et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680920 | Wan | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690795 | Richards | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704368 | Nefedov | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704369 | Kawasaki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707801 | Hsu | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711182 | Gibbs et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714650 | Maillard et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721805 | Bhagwat et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728226 | Naito | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731936 | Chen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735177 | Suzuki | May 2004 | B1 |
6735190 | Chuah et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738942 | Sridharan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751218 | Hagirahim et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760602 | Tangorra et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6760752 | Liu et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763025 | Leatherbury et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765909 | Sen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766024 | Rix | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775303 | Rustad et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781999 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788681 | Hurren et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792048 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798791 | Riazi et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801508 | Lim | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804520 | Johansson et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810499 | Sridharan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6819930 | Laroia et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826406 | Vialen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829741 | Khansari et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831910 | Moon et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832314 | Irvin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6856800 | Henry et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862684 | DiGiorgio | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870923 | Yi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879573 | Huo | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6879690 | Faccin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882850 | McConnell et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882860 | Kim | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885874 | Grube et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888899 | Raleigh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895216 | Sato et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895546 | Ivry | May 2005 | B2 |
6898285 | Hutchings et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898640 | Kurita | May 2005 | B1 |
6909702 | Leung et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915272 | Zilliacus et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6918035 | Patel | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6920119 | Rinchiuso | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925285 | Kim | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952454 | Jalali et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6956833 | Yukie et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959384 | Serret-Avila | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963544 | Balachandran et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6978143 | Vialen | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6983410 | Chen et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987982 | Willenegger et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990680 | Wugofski | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7016351 | Farinacci et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7024616 | Ohira et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031666 | Hsu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039180 | Issaa et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7069436 | Akachi | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7079502 | Yamano et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079523 | Nelson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7096355 | Marvit et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7114175 | Lahteenmaki | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116892 | Wajs | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133353 | Sourour et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7134019 | Shelest et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7181620 | Hur | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184789 | Leung et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185362 | Hawkes et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197072 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203314 | Kahn et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7209459 | Kangas | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215775 | Noguchi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219291 | Adde et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228358 | McManus | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7237108 | Medvinsky et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239704 | Maillard et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7266687 | Sowa et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7301946 | Meier et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301968 | Haran et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308100 | Bender et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321968 | Capellaro et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7349425 | Leung et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352868 | Hawkes et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376963 | Kato et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391866 | Fukami et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7428512 | Nozaki et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7599655 | Agashe et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7649829 | Chen et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7669104 | Uchida et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693508 | Leung et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697523 | Leung et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742781 | Chen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7792074 | Chen et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7944925 | Meier et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8077679 | Leung | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8098818 | Grilli et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121296 | Hawkes et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8730999 | Chen et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010004761 | Zehavi | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010029581 | Knauft | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034254 | Ranta | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036200 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010036834 | Das et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010055298 | Baker et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001386 | Akiyama | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002541 | Williams | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002674 | Grimes et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014159 | Tatsumi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021809 | Salo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023165 | Lahr | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026525 | Armitage | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020071558 | Patel | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020076195 | Nakajima et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080887 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091860 | Kalliokulju et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091931 | Quick et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097722 | Liao et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099949 | Fries et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102964 | Park | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112234 | Bacon | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114469 | Faccin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020141591 | Hawkes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164025 | Raiz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169724 | Moroney et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181423 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009669 | White et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014685 | Chong, Jr. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028805 | Lahteenmaki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030581 | Roy | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031322 | Beckmann et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035389 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039237 | Forslow | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054807 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072384 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030087653 | Leung et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101401 | Salvi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123669 | Koukoulidis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126440 | Go et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134655 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135748 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157952 | Sarkkinen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030217057 | Kuroiwa et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019787 | Shibata | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022216 | Shi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040095515 | Tajima | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101138 | Revital et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107350 | Wasilewski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120527 | Hawkes et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131185 | Kakumer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132402 | Agashe et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151317 | Hyyppa et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199474 | Ritter | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202329 | Jung et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243808 | Ishiguro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266391 | Hafren | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008159 | Grilli et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010774 | Rose et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050048963 | Kubler et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055551 | Becker et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063544 | Uusitalo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108563 | Becker et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138379 | Semple et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144550 | Jeon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165711 | Hamatsu | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050238315 | Kataoka | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050271210 | Soppera | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060078000 | Rinne et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060168446 | Ahonen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171540 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242412 | Jung et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070038610 | Omoigui | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070116282 | Hawkes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070214482 | Nguyen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070280169 | Cam Winget | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080226073 | Hawkes et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100048206 | Agashe et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100107041 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100142432 | Leung et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100272124 | Chen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110045864 | Chen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120314650 | Medapalli et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130022032 | Taghavi Nasrabadi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2308405 | Nov 2000 | CA |
1240317 | Jan 2000 | CN |
1256599 | Jun 2000 | CN |
1281561 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1299497 | Jun 2001 | CN |
0636963 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0702477 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0717566 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0748058 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0813309 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0854618 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0924898 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0928084 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0951198 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0993128 | Apr 2000 | EP |
0999656 | May 2000 | EP |
1001570 | May 2000 | EP |
1075123 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1024661 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1030484 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1032150 | Aug 2000 | EP |
2346512 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1071296 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1075118 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1098446 | May 2001 | EP |
1117204 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1143635 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1185125 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1190526 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1213943 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1248188 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1374477 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1101042 | Apr 1989 | JP |
2090840 | Mar 1990 | JP |
H0362630 | Mar 1991 | JP |
03179841 | May 1991 | JP |
5216411 | Aug 1993 | JP |
06125554 | May 1994 | JP |
7193569 | Jul 1995 | JP |
09-135478 | May 1997 | JP |
9331314 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10023529 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10051380 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10063598 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-093547 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10191459 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10200536 | Jul 1998 | JP |
H10210029 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10240826 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10512428 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11110401 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11127468 | May 1999 | JP |
11136669 | May 1999 | JP |
11161167 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-243569 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11510668 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11-331070 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11-331150 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11313059 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11513853 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11-355958 | Dec 1999 | JP |
11345179 | Dec 1999 | JP |
11355460 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000040064 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-078555 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000115860 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000137551 | May 2000 | JP |
2000138632 | May 2000 | JP |
2000165258 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000183968 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-196673 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000196546 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000224261 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000224648 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-253459 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000244603 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000253065 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000261374 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000269959 | Sep 2000 | JP |
000513519 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000295541 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000324155 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000349755 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001007759 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001016179 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001018253 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001500327 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-053675 | Feb 2001 | JP |
200136941 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001045100 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-077859 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001136507 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-177513 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001177523 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001177564 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001510970 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001268535 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2003259284 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001333032 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002502204 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002064785 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002505458 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002514024 | May 2002 | JP |
2002175505 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002521879 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002216040 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002232418 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002232962 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002524941 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002300152 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002319936 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002353951 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003503896 | Jan 2003 | JP |
200352029 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003099327 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003115832 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003124927 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003521843 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003297015 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003339000 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004048718 | Feb 2004 | JP |
200480663 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004507175 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004533174 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004343764 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005509367 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005512471 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005507572 | May 2005 | JP |
2006518975 | Aug 2006 | JP |
20000062153 | Oct 2000 | KR |
200130725 | Apr 2001 | KR |
20010030696 | Apr 2001 | KR |
2073913 | Feb 1997 | RU |
2077113 | Apr 1997 | RU |
2091983 | Sep 1997 | RU |
2115249 | Jul 1998 | RU |
2147792 | Apr 2000 | RU |
2187205 | Aug 2002 | RU |
353841 | Mar 1999 | TW |
373372 | Nov 1999 | TW |
388158 | Apr 2000 | TW |
448658 | Aug 2001 | TW |
502190 | Sep 2002 | TW |
8301881 | May 1983 | WO |
8607224 | Dec 1986 | WO |
9611538 | Apr 1996 | WO |
97015161 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9717790 | May 1997 | WO |
9716924 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9716890 | May 1997 | WO |
97048212 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO97047094 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9810604 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO98025422 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO9857509 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO9904583 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO99022466 | May 1999 | WO |
9930234 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO99039524 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO9944114 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9949595 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO99049588 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9959355 | Nov 1999 | WO |
9962231 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO9966657 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0002406 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0004718 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO000883 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0013436 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO00013356 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0033535 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0036804 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0041364 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0051308 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0052880 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0056018 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0057601 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0062547 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO00072609 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0079734 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO00074311 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074425 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0076125 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0076234 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0078008 | Dec 2000 | WO |
01001630 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0110146 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO01013358 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0119027 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO01020805 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0145443 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2002008449 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0215578 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO0247407 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO2002047356 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02061572 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02080449 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02080454 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02096150 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02054663 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO2003001772 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03032573 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03043310 | May 2003 | WO |
03051056 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO03051072 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO03063418 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO2004025895 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2005008393 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2009130589 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Carsten Bormann: “Robust Header Compression (ROHC): Framework and four profiles: RTP, UDP, ESP, and uncompressed <draft-ietf-rohc-rtp-09.txt>,” Internet Engineering Task Force IETF Draft; URL:http://www.—globecom.net/jetf/draft/draft-ietf-rohc-rtp-09.html. Retrieved Mar. 22, 2003. Feb. 26, 2001, pp. 1-145. |
“Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Radio Interface for Broadcast/Multicast Services (3GPP TR 25.925 version 3.3.0 Release 1999)” ETSI TR 125 925 V3.3.0, Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 1-35, XP002230388, p. 17-18; Figure 6.5. |
Berkovits, S. “How to Broadcast a Secret” Advances in Cryptology, Eurocrypt, International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, Springer-Verlag, Delaware, Apr. 11, 1991, pp. 535-541. |
Farinacci, D., et al., “Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), ” Network Working Group Request for Comments 2784, Mar. 1-8, 2000. <URL:http://www.globecom.net/ieft/rfc/rfc2784.html> (retrieved on Feb. 14, 2003). |
Handley, M. et al., “SDP: Session Description Protocol” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2327, Category: Standards Track. ISI/LBNL, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-42. |
Jalali, A., et al. “Data Throughput of CDMA-HDR a High Efficiency-High Data Rate Personal Communication Wireless System,” 2000 IEEE, pp. 1854-1858. |
Jou, Y. “Developments in Third Generation (3G) CDMA Technology,” 2000 IEEE, pp. 460-464. |
Keeler, Robert E., “Interoperability Considerations for Digital HDTV,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 37, No. 4, Dec. 1991, pp. 128-130. |
Linuxguruz. “Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing,” § Internet Protocol, Dec. 2000. |
Marchent, B.G., et al. “Intelligent Control of Mobile Multimedia Systems” Vehicular Technology Conference 1998. VTC 98, 48th IEEE Ottawa, Canada, May 18-21, 1998; New York, USA, May 18, 1998, pp. 2047-2051. |
Menezes, A.J., et al. “Keying Layering and Cryptoperiods, Passage,” Handbook of Applied Cryptography, CRC Press Series on Discrete Mathematices and its Applications, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, US, 1997, pp. 551-553, 577-581. |
Rose, Greg, et al., “The Secure Real Time Transport Protocol,” Internet Draft, Feb. 2001, pp. 1-26. |
Schneier, Bruce. Applied Cryptography, Second Edition, 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 182-184. |
Shannon, C.E., “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379-423, 623-656, Jul. Oct. 1948. |
Simpson, W., “PPP in HDLC-Like Framing,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 1662 (RFC 1662), Jul. 1994, pp. 1-17. |
Tanenbaum, Andrew S.: Computer Networks, Third Edition; Pub. 1996: pp. 8, and 179-190. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09826, ISA, EPO, Dec. 9, 2002. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09829, ISA, EPO, Mar. 4, 2003. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09830, ISA, EPO, Mar. 10, 2003. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09831, ISA, EPO, Mar. 4, 2003. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09832, ISA, EPO, Nov. 26, 2002. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09833, ISA, EPO, Nov. 26, 2002. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09834, ISA, EPO, Feb. 27, 2003. |
International Search Report PCT/US02/09835, ISA, EPO, Jul. 8, 2002. |
International Search Report PCT/US03/26897, ISA, EPO, Jan. 16, 2004. |
Bormann, C., et al., “Robust Header Compression (ROHC),” Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Feb. 7, 2001, pp. 1-153, The Internet Society (ISOC). Reston, Virginia, USA. |
Bormann, C., et al., “Robust Header Compression (ROHC): Framework and Four Profiles,” Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task.Force, Feb. 26, 2001, pp. 1-153, The Internet Society (ISOC), Reston, Virginia, USA. |
Yamaguchi, S., “Realization of Multimedia Communications”, Unix Magazine, Jun. 1. 1996. pages 45-53, vol. 11, No. 6, Ascii Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. |
Foldoc, “Spread-spectrum communications”, definition, dated Aug. 8, 2001, from <http://foldoc.org/index.cgi? query=spread+spectrum>. |
Schneier, B.: “Applied Cryptography, Conference Key Distribution and Secret Broadcasting” Second Edition, pp. 520, 523-524, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. XP002248263 (1996). |
Menezes. A. et al.: “Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” Chapter 13, pp. 543-590, CRC Press (1996). |
Menezes, A. et al.: “Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” pp. 497-500, 551-552, CRC Press LIC, USA XP002248262 (1997). |
Mooij, W.: “Advances in Conditional Access Technology”, IEEE. pp. 461-464 (Sep. 1997). |
Schneier, B.: “Applied Cryptography,” Second Edition, pp. 170, 171, 173, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1996). |
Stallings, W.: “Cryptography and Network Security,” pp. 402-406, 413-417, 421-424, Prentice-Hall, Inc., XP002248261 (1995). |
International Preliminary Examination Report. PCT/US2002/009829—International Preliminary Examining Authority—US, Mar. 31, 2005. |
IEEE, “IEEE STD. 802.11, Part 11; Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) And Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications”1997, pp. 60-70. |
Macq, Benoit M. et al., “Cryptology for digital TV Broadcasting”, 1995 IEEE. |
Tanenbaum, Andrew S,: Computer Networks: Second Edition: Pub 1993 XP2530414. |
You Xiaohu, “D&R Progress on China'S 3G Mobile Communications”, Telecom Science, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 11-17. |
“Functional Model of a Conditional Access System”, EBU Review—Technical European Broadcasting Union, Bussels, BE, No. 266; Dec. 21, 1995: pp. 64-77; XP000559450. |
3G TS 25.213 V4.1.0 (Jun. 2001) 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Channels and Mapping of Transport Channels Onto Physical Channels (FDD)(Release 4). |
3GPP TS 25.211 V4.20. (Sep. 2001) 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Channels and Mapping of Transport Channels Onto Physical Channels (FDD)(Release 4). |
3GPP TS 25.212 V4.2.0 (Sep. 2001) 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Multiplexing and Chennel Coding (FDD)(Release 4). |
3GPP TS 25.214 V4.2.0 (Sep. 2001) 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Layer Procedures (FDD)(Release 4). |
3GPP2 C.20002-0 Version 1.0 (Jul. 1999) 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 “3GPP”Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems. |
Al-Tawil, “A New Authentication Protocol for Roaming Users In GSM”, Proceedings for IEEE International Symposium on Computer and Communication, Jul. 6, 1999, pp. 93-99. |
Pannetrat et al., Authenticating Real-Time Packet Streams and Multicasts, 2002 IEEE. Computers and Communications, 2002. Proceesings. ISCC 2002. Seventh International Symposium on pp. 490-495. |
B.G. Marchent et al., “Intelligent Control of Mobile Multimedia Systems”Vehicular Technology Conference 1998. VTC 98, 48th IEEE Ottawa, Canada, May 18-21, 1998; New York, USA, May 18, 1998, pp. 2047-2051. |
Baccelli, F. et al., “Self Organizing Hierarchical Multicast Trees and Their Optimization,”INFOCOM 1999. IEEE, 1081-1089 (Mar. 21, 1999). |
Baugher et al: “The Secure Real Time Transport Protocol (Draft 09)” Internet Engineering Task Force, AVT Working Froup, Internet -Draft, Jul. 2003, XP002320685. |
Bormann, C. et al., “Robust Header Compression (ROHC)” Internet Draft, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-122, XP002901751 (pp. 4-5). |
Bormann, et al., “Robust Header Compression (ROHC),” Internet Engineering Task Force IETF Draft, 1-145, Feb. 26, 2011. |
Brown; “The Electronic Post it Note Model for Mobile Computing Applications,” Computing Lab, The University, Canterbury, Kent, the Institution of Electrical Engineers, IEEE, Savoy Place, London, WC2R.OBL, UK. |
ETSI: “Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS): MuItimedia : Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS), Stage 1, 3GPP TS 22.146 version 5.2.0 Release 5”, ETSI TS 22.146 v5.2.0. pp. 1-15, Mar. 2002. |
Gong, L. at al., “Trade-Offs in Routing Private Multicast Traffic,” Global Telecommunications Conference, 1995, IEEE, 2124-2128 (Nov. 13, 1995). |
Kalliokulju J. “User Plane Architecture Of 3rd Generation Mobile Telecommunication Network,” IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON, Proceedings on Networks (ICON′99), Sep. 28, 1999-Oct. 1, 1999, pp. 270-278, XP010354980. |
Lin, et al: “A Multicast Routing Protocol for Multichip Wireless Networks,” Dept. of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chung Cheng University, Taiwan, Global Telecommunications Conference, XP010373304. |
Lou et al., “Progressive Video Streaming Over 2G and 3G Wireiess Systems,” Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 2, Sep. 18-21, 2000, London, pp. 1550-1554. |
Meier J. D. et al.,“Building Secure ASP.NET Applications: Authentication, Authorization, and Secure Communication: Cryptography, and Certificates” Microsoft Patterns & Practices. Nov. 2002, pp. 1-5, XP002321827. |
Paul K. et al; “A Stability-Based Distributed Routing Mechanism to Support Unicast and Multicast Routing in AD HOC Wireless Network” Computer Communcations, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 24, No. 18, Dec. 1, 2001, pp. 1828-1845, XP0043. |
Takahashi: “Prospect of Push type Information Providing Service/Technology” Information Processing, vol. 39, No. 11, Nov. 15, 1998, pp.1124-1131. |
TIA/EIA/IS-856 Interim Standard cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Air Interface Specification (Nov. 2000). |
TIA/EIA/IS-95-A (Revision of TIA/EIA/IS-95) Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System (May 1995). |
Toh C-K et al: “Abam: On-Demand Associativity-Based Multicast Routing For AD HOC Mobile Networks,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2000. IEE, 987-993 (2000). |
Waitzman, et al., “The Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol (DVMRP), ”RFC 1075, Nov. 1, 1998. |
Yang et al: “An Efficient Multicast Delivery Scheme To Support Mobile IP,” Database and Expert Systems Applications, 1999, IEEE, 638-88 (Sep. 1, 1999). |
Asaka et al., “Dynamic Multicast Routing Using Predetermined Path Search”, Technical Report of IEICE (The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers), SSE95-56 IN99-37 CS99-78, Sep. 27, 1999. |
Tadaumi, “IP Technology as Communication Infra,” The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Engineers, column 83, No. 4, Apr. 2000, pp. 286-294. |
William Stallings: “Cryptography and network security: Principles and Practice” Second Edition, 1999, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. |
3GPP TS 25.214 v4.1.0(Jun. 2001) Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Physical layer procedures (FDD), Release 4, ETSI TS 125 214 V4.1.0, Jun 2001. |
Alfred J. Menezes, Paul C. van Oorschot and Scott A. Vanstone. Handbook of Applied 085 Cryptography, CRC Press. (Oct. 1996): p. 364 (in particular, refer to section 9.6.3), http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/hac/about/chap9.pdf. |
Haverinen, et al., “EAP SIM Authentication” draft-haver inen-pppext-eap-sim-11 .txt, [online] <URL:http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-haverinen-pppext-eap-sim- 11 ,txt> Jun. 2003, pp. 1-64. |
JNSA, “Trend of the Latest Security Protocol IPsecH-with Demonstration Experiment Report for interconnection,” Network Magazine, vol. 6, No. 6, Japan, Jun. 2001, vol. 6, pp. 86-93. |
Okamoto, “Encryption Technology For Realizing A Bright Information Society 5: Management of Encryption Key Distribution”, Bit, Japan, Kyoritsu Shuppan Co., Ltd., Nov. 1, 1991, vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 51-59. |
Pelletier, et el., “Robust Header Compression (ROHC): A Profile for TCP/IP (ROHC-TCP)”, Internet Draft, Feb. 21, 2005, pp. 1-2. |
TIA/EIA/IS-95-B Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System (IS-95 Standard), Feb. 3, 1999. |
European Search Report—EP10004607, Search Authority—Munich Patent Office, Nov. 18, 2010 (020020EPD1). |
European Search Report—EP10005810, Search Authority—Munich Patent Office, Nov. 10, 2010 (020020EPD2). |
Haverinen H: “EAP SIM Authentication”, 3GPP Draft; S3-010663—Draft-haverinen-ppext-EAP-SIM-0 1, 3RD Generation Partnership-Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centrel; 650, Route de Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. SA WG3, No. Sophia; 2011128, Nov. 28, 2001, XP050271835, [retrieved on Nov. 28, 2001]. |
Supplementary European Search Report—EP04777745, Search Authority—Berlin Patent Office, Dec. 14, 2010 (030400). |
Taiwanese Search report—093124861—TIPO—Dec. 7, 2010 (060806). |
Translation of Office Action in Japanese application 2002-577339 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 09/933,971 , citing JP11331070, JP2090840, JP2000115860 dated Oct. 19, 2010 (010439JP). |
Bauer D., et al., “An error-control scheme for a multicast protocol based on round trip time calculations ”, Local Computer Networks, 1996., Proceedings 21ST IEEE Conference on Minneapolis, MN, USA Oct. 13-16, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA,IEEE Comput. Soc, US, Oct. 13, 1996, pp. 212-221, XP010200690, DOI: 10.1109/LCN. 1996.558149 ISBN: 978-0/8186-7617-8 * chapters 3 + 3.1*. |
“Feature Story I: Evolution of Cellular Phones,” ASCII, Dec. 1, 2000, vol. 24, No. 12, pp. 204. |
Menezes, Alfred J., et al.,“Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” 1997 CRC Press, pp. 169-190. |
Mysore, J. P., et al., Performance of transport protocols over a multicasting-based architecture for Internet host mobility, Communications, 1998. ICC 98. Conference Record. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Atlanta, GA, USA June 7-11, 1998, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, vol. 3, Jun. 7, 1998, pp. 1817-1823, XP010284635, DOI : 10.1109/ICC. 1998.683142 ISBN: 978-07803-4788-5 * abstract * chapter 2 *. |
Yajnik M., et al., “Packet loss correlation in the MBone multicast network”, Global Telecommunications Conference, 1996. Globecom '96. 'Communications: The Key to Global Prosperity London, UK Nov. 18-22, 1996, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, Nov. 18, 1996, pp. 94-99, XP010220159, DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM. 1996.586133 ISBN: 978-0-7803-3336-9 * chapter 3.1*. |
Ohnishi H., et al., “Proposed Scheme for Route Optimization on the Mobile IP Network,” Technical Report of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, SSE99-123 PS99-47, Dec. 17, 1999. |
Taiwan Search Report—TW093120386—TIPO—Feb. 8, 2012 (030337TW). |
European Search Report—EP2204939—Search Authority—Berlin—May 8, 2012 (020002EPD2). |
R.Sinnarajah, Signaling Support for Broadcast Service, 3GPP2 TSG-C Contribution, 2002, C20-20020107-022, URL http://ftp.3gpp2.org /TSGC/Working/2002/TSG-C-0201/TSG-C-0201-Vancouver/WG2/C20-20020107-020 (Signal ing-Support-forBroadcast-Service).doc. |
Qualcomm Europe: “MBMS Security Framework”, 3GPP TSG SA WG3 Security—S3 #29 S3-030356, Jul. 2003, MBMS Security and 3GPP-3GPP2 joint meeting. |
Romkey J., “A Nonstandard for Transmission of IP Datagrams Over Serial Lines: Slip”, rfc1055, IETF, Jun., 1988, URL, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1055.txt. |
3GPP2 C.R1001-A, “Administration of Parameter Value Assignments for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Standards Release C” Jul. 14, 2000, Version 2.0. |
Chen T., et al.,“cdma2000 Broadcast Services Stage 2: System Design”,C10-20010820-008,3GPP2,Aug. 20, 2001. |
European Search Report—EP10158699—Search Authority—Munich—Jun. 22, 2010 (010498EPD1). |
Haverinen, H., “GSM SIM Authentication and Key Generation for Mobile IP”; draft-haverinen-nriobileip-gsmsimi-01.txt; Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, CH; Nov. 2000; XP015014135. |
Momona, M., et al., “Technologies and Standardization Activities in Cable TV Access Networks,” IEICE Technical Report, Japan. The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE), Feb. 15, 1999. vol. 98, No. 589: pp. 57-64. |
Brown; “The Electronic Post it Note Model for Mobile Computing Applications,” Computing Lab, The University, Canterbury, Kent, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, IEEE, Savoy Piece, London, WC2R OBL, UK. 1995. |
Estrin, et al., “The Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM),” RFC 2362, Jun. 1998. |
ETSI: “Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS), Stage 1, 3GPP TS 22.146 version 5.2.0 Release 5”, ETSI TS 22.146 v5.2.0, pp.1-15, Mar. 2002. |
Gong, L. at al: “TRADE-Offs in Routing Private Multicast Traffic,” Global Telecommunications Conference, 1995, IEEE, 2124-2128 (Nov. 13, 1995). |
Kalliokulju J.: “Plane Architecture of 3rd Generation Mobile Telecommunication Network,” IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON, Proceedings on Networks (ICON′99), Sep. 28, 1999-Oct. 1, 1999, pp. 270- 278, XP010354980. |
Lin, et al: “A Multicast Routing Protocol for Multichip Wireless Networks,” Dept. of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chung Cheng University, Taiwan, Global Telecommunications Conference, XP010373304, 1999. |
Lou et al., “Progressive Video Streaming Over 2G and 3G Wireless Systems,” Proceedings of the 11TH IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 2, Sep. 18-21, 2000: London, pp. 1550-1554. |
Meier J D et al:. “Building Secure ASP.NET Applications: Authentication, Authorization, and Secure Communication: Cryptography, and Certificates” Microsoft Patterns & Practices. Nov. 2002, pp. 1-5, XP002321827. |
Miyazaki: “A Stream-data Multicast Protocol Using IP Unicast Address” Technical Report of IEICE, IN2001-9, May 11, 2001. |
Moy, “Multicast Extensions to OSPF,” RFC 1584, Mar. 1994. |
Paul K et al: “Stability-Based Distributed Routing Mechanism to Support Unicast and Multicast Routing in AD HOC Wireless Network”Computer Communcations, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020141371 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60279970 | Mar 2001 | US |