The present invention is related to frame rate conversion.
Moving pictures are captured using equipment that records a sequence of static images that, when displayed in sequence, create the appearance of motion. The rate at which the static images are captured is known as the frame rate. There are many standards defining the frame rates commonly used in film-making and television. In the United States, film is commonly captured at a rate of 24 frames per second (fps) or Hertz (Hz). At this rate, motion is captured adequately, and allows for creative expression due to a slow rate of image change. However, if viewed at this rate in a system designed to be viewed at a higher frame rate, the moving image may appear choppy. Video capture, as opposed to film, generally records images at a rate of 50 to 60 fps.
Video processing and display devices may receive input signals representing motion pictures captured at different frame rates. Additionally, processing may have occurred to the signal prior to it reaching the device whereby the received signal is converted to a different frame rate than the frame rate at which the original source was captured. In either case, the input signals must be processed and the signal to be displayed must be converted to a frame rate appropriate for the display device. When the frame rate needs to be increased, the frequency of the sequenced images may be increased by repeating frames a certain number of times. While this does not accurately reproduce the true motion of the subject of the image, it may allow the viewer to perceive the video with less flickering, on some types of display devices. Additionally, frame rate conversion processing may include analysis of changes from one frame to the next at a pixel level to create estimates of the motion within the image and thereby allow intermediate frames to be synthesized, to enhance the perception of motion.
It is becoming increasingly popular to convert video images from 50 or 60 Hz to 100 or 120 Hz to get much higher frame rates. This can reduce the motion blur problem inherent in those LCD displays which use a fluorescent backlight. When images are displayed on such LCD displays at a higher frame rate, there is a psycho-visual phenomenon occurring within the brain of the viewer where the appearance of blurring is lessened. Achieving motion blur reduction in this way requires motion compensated frame rate conversion.
Occasionally, an input signal will include image capture information from more than one original source. An example of this is picture-in-picture where a video image is displayed as background with a second video image being inset into the first video image so that both motion pictures can be viewed simultaneously. In order to do this, the multiple input signals must be combined into a composited signal containing both sequences of images. This composited image must be converted to a single frame rate regardless of the frame rates at which each of the original images was captured. In present frame rate conversion systems, such conversions may exhibit undesired visual artifacts when attempting to display the composited image after frame rate conversion. These systems lose information about each of the input signals when the signals are combined in the compositing and scaling process. Such information could be used by the frame rate converter when creating frame rate conversion decisions. Therefore it would be beneficial to have a system where the data regarding input video signals is generated and transmitted to the frame rate converter processor along with the signal for use by the frame rate converter to create a final output video image.
A method and apparatus for performing frame rate conversion in video signals includes receiving one or more independent input video signals, each originally captured at a particular frame rate. The frame rate is changed by a frame rate converter to a new desired frame rate for the device or system on which the final video signal is to be viewed. Multiple independent input video signals may be combined in a final video image that contains distinct images from each input source signal in a composited video signal that allows each independent input video signal to be viewed simultaneously. Descriptive information relating to each independent input video signal is available at the time the signal is received. The descriptive information is identified and maintained during the compositing process then transmitted to a frame rate converter that makes decisions regarding frame rate conversion based, in part, on the descriptive information to create a final video output signal at a desired frame rate. The availability of the descriptive information enables the frame rate conversion to be performed with reduced computational complexity and/or improved picture quality.
Frame rate conversion is an important process in providing high quality motion pictures for viewing on various display equipment. Video signals are made up of sequences of separately captured pictures that, when viewed in their proper sequence, create the appearance of motion in subject matter of the picture. When it is desired to increase the frame rate of a given video signal, however, a problem exists in that the true movement of the subject matter was captured at a lower frame rate, and images of the intervening timeframe between frames are not captured, so processes must be devised to create a higher frame rate sequence by estimating the missing timeframes by evaluating the changes in pixels from one captured frame to the next. Individual frames may sometimes be repeated in the final video signal to provide a higher frame rate than the originally captured frame rate.
Some video applications involve the displaying of multiple input signals in a single viewing area. Examples of this are an on-screen display such as a menu, or a picture-in-picture display where one video image serves as a background while a second video image appears as an inset within the first image in a single video image containing independent video sub-parts. In cases like this, multiple video input signals are combined into a composited video signal representing the images of all input signals. Also, a particular input video signal may be resized to accommodate the dimensions of the composited signal. The terms compositor and scaler are used to identify the device or process of combining and resizing input signals, respectively.
In
The descriptive information that is derived by the controller processor 105 of the compositor/scaler 103 is helpful when interpolating frames. Interpolation requires analysis of various areas of pixels in each transmitted image to analyze apparent motion indicated in changing pixels from one frame to the next. The task becomes more complicated as captured video may have several subjects in the frame each moving at a different relative speed. An example of this is a video image of a person in the foreground walking on a sidewalk along a street while cars are speeding by in the background. The frame interpolator 111 must identify the relative motion of each element of the video image and compensate for the relative motion of each subject. By comparing the differences between video frames that are temporally near each other, estimations can be made to interpolate frames between the existing frames that attempt to reproduce the scene at a time that was not captured in real time as the source signal 101 was captured. Descriptive information, such as the original capture frame rate and the original resolution of the original input signal 101 among other descriptive factors make the job of the frame interpolator 111 easier and more efficient. This descriptive information would be lost before the signal reached the frame rate converter 109 had the signal not been transmitted along with the descriptive information 107.
A method of transmitting and using descriptive information in a frame rate conversion processor 200 is shown in
Referring to
While the compositor/scaler 305 and the frame rate converter 309 are described herein in view of their separate functions, the system 300 of
When two or more video streams are composited into a single stream, the input streams may have drastically different frame rates, or may have only slight differences. For instance, the nominal frame rate for US video signals is 59.94 Hz, however, there is a tolerance so if two input signals have frame rates of 59.94001 Hz and 59.94003, over time the frames in the two signals would fall out of synchronization causing excess or dropped frames in one of the signals. In another example, if the input streams were captured at approximately 24 Hz, a 3:2 pulldown would typically be used to convert the 24 Hz signal to 60 Hz. This adaptation of 24 Hz to 60 Hz will create phase differences causing frames to fall out of synchronization.
The frame rate converter 309 in
While the example presented above includes a composited video signal comprising two original input signals, a single received signal could be transmitted to the frame rate converter 309 with descriptive information and be used to convert the frame rate of the single input stream.
a and 5b are block diagrams representing the compositor/scaler 105 in accordance with example embodiments of the invention.
Although the features and elements are described in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements or in various combinations with or without other features and elements. The methods or flow charts provided may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware tangibly embodied in a computer-readable storage medium for execution by a general purpose computer or a processor. Examples of computer-readable storage mediums include a read only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a register, cache memory, semiconductor memory devices, magnetic media such as internal hard disks and removable disks, magneto-optical media, and optical media such as CD-ROM disks, and digital versatile disks (DVDs).
Suitable processors include, by way of example, a general purpose processor, a special purpose processor, a conventional processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in association with a DSP core, a controller, a microcontroller, Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) circuits, any other type of integrated circuit (IC), and/or a state machine.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5623308 | Civanlar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5953506 | Kalra et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6456335 | Miura et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6490250 | Hinchley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6564003 | Marko et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 7206026 | Hsiung et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7405768 | Tanaka | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7688384 | Davis et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 8116588 | Choe et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8937683 | Deng et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 20010010708 | Nakazawa | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020147987 | Reynolds et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030035481 | Hahm | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20040252230 | Winder | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261135 | Cahnbley et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050001930 | Mao | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050078884 | Yi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134735 | Swartz | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249282 | Landsiedel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060245502 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271979 | Hejna, Jr. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070189392 | Tourapis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070229703 | Lu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258702 | Sugio et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080018785 | Bennett | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024390 | Baker et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080025390 | Shi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080199156 | Uchiike et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211968 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090208123 | Doswald | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100013988 | Hulyalkar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100013988 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |