This invention relates generally to the field of treatment of glands in order to restore natural secretory function to obstructed glands within the body and specifically, the meibomian glands of the eye.
The human body contains a number of glands including the lacrimal and meibomian glands of the eye, the sebaceous or pilo-sebaceous hair glands on the face and underarms, and the mammary glands in the breasts. These glands may malfunction due to age, irritation, environmental conditions, cellular debris, inflammation, hormonal imbalance and other causes. One common malfunction is the restriction or stoppage of the natural flow of secretions out of the gland. The present invention provides methods and modalities to enhance and/or restore the natural flow of secretions out of the glands.
While the description that follows is directed to the meibomian glands of the eye, it will be understood that the present invention may be employed to treat all of the external glands of the body. With particular reference to the human eye, the tear film covering the ocular surfaces is composed of three layers. The innermost layer in contact with the ocular surface is the mucus layer. The middle layer comprising the bulk of the tear film is the aqueous layer, and the outermost layer is a thin (less than 250 nm) layer comprised of many lipids known as “meibum” or “sebum”. The sebum is secreted by the meibomian glands, enlarged specialized sebaceous-type glands (hence, the use of “sebum” to describe the secretion) located on both the upper and lower eye lids, with orifices designed to discharge the lipid secretions onto the lid margins, thus forming the lipid layer of the tear film. The typical upper lid has approximately 25 meibomian glands and the lower lid has approximately 20 meibomian glands, which are somewhat larger than those located in the upper lid. The meibomian gland comprises various sac-like acini which discharge the secretion into the duct of the gland. The secretion then passes into the orifices which are surrounded by smooth muscle tissue and the muscle of Riolan which are presumed to aid in the expression of sebum. The meibomian gland orifices open on the lid margin usually along the mucocutaneous junction also known as the gray line. The meibomian gland orifices are assumed to open with blinking and release minute amounts of sebum secretions onto the lid margin and then into the inferior tear meniscus. The lipid “sebum” in the tear meniscus is spread upward and over the tear film of the open eye by the upward blink action. If the lipid secretions are optimal, and adequate lipid layer is maintained at the air interface to minimize evaporation and prevent dry eye states. If the lipid secretions are inadequate the lipid layer is not adequate to minimize evaporation with resulting rapid evaporation leading to dry eye states. Thus, it will be seen that a defective lipid layer or an incorrect quantity or quality of such lipids can result in accelerated evaporation of the aqueous layer which, in turn, causes symptoms which may include symptoms such as dryness, scratching, irritation, burning, tearing, redness, and itchiness, which are collectively be referred to as “dry eye” symptoms.
Dry eye states have many etiologies. A common cause of common dry eye states is the condition known as “meibomian gland dysfunction”, a disorder where the glands are obstructed or occluded. As employed herein the terms “occluded” and “obstruction” as they relate to meibomian gland dysfunction are defined as partially or completely blocked or plugged meibomian glands. If completely obstructed the gland cannot secrete. If partially or intermittently occluded the gland may secrete either normal or decreased amounts of sebum. More usually the secretions are altered having semi-solid, thickened, congested secretions, frequently described as inspissated. The secretions may be clear or yellowish, the latter indicating possible infection, meibomitis, an inflammation of the meibomian glands leading to their dysfunction, is usually accompanied by blepharitis (inflammation of the lids). Meibomian gland dysfunction may accompany meibomitis, or meibomian gland dysfunction may be present without obvious lid inflammation. Meibomian gland dysfunction is frequently the result of keratotic obstruction of the individual meibomian gland orifices and/or the central duct (canal) of the gland which compromises the secretory functions of the individual meibomian glands. More particularly, these keratotic obstructions include a combination of desquamated epitlelial cells, keratin, sebaceous ground substance, and bacteria, see, Korb et al., Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Contact Lens Intolerance, Journal of the Optometric Association, Vol. 51, Number 3, (1980), pp. 243-251. While meibomitis is obvious by inspection of the external lids, meibomian gland dysfunction may not be obvious even when examined with the magnification of the slit-lamp biomicroscope, since there may not be external signs or the external signs may be so minimal that they are overlooked. The external signs of meibomian gland dysfunction may be limited to subtle alterations of the meibomian gland orifices, subtle or pronounced overgrowth of epithelium over the orifices, and pouting of the orifices of the glands with congealed material acting as the obstructive material under the epithelia overgrowth resulting in the pouting of the orifices.
Hormonal changes include those which occur during menopause, and particularly changing estrogen levels, can result in thickening of the oils secreted by the meibomian glands which results in clogged gland orifices. Further, decreased estrogen levels may also enhance conditions under which staphylococcal bacteria can proliferate. This can cause migration of the bacteria into the glands, thus resulting in a decreased secretion rate.
When the flow of secretions from the meibomian gland is restricted due to the existence of an obstruction, epithelial cells on the eyelid margin tend to grow over the gland orifice thus further restricting sebum flow and exacerbating the dry eye condition.
Additional factors which may cause or exacerbate meibomian gland dysfunction include, age, contact lens wear and hygiene, disorders of blinking, extended computer use, cosmetic use, or other illness, particularly diabetes.
Clinical evaluation of the meibomian glands requires the application of pressure to the external surface of the eyelids over the meibomian glands in order to determine whether secretion is obtained from the individual gland with gentle pressure. If gentle pressure does not provide secretion, forceful expression may be utilized to determine if secretion can be obtained. Thus, the state of an individual meibomian gland can vary from optimal, where clear meibomian sebum is expressed with gentle pressure; to mild or moderate meibomian gland dysfunction where milky fluid or inspissated or creamy secretion may be obtained; to total blockage where no secretion of any sort can be obtained even with the application of extreme pressure (see Korb, et al., “Increase in Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness Following Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction”, Lacrimal Gland, tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes, pp. 293-298, Edited by D. A. Sullivan, Plenum Press, New York (1994)). Significant chemical changes of the meibomian gland secretions occur with meibomian gland dysfunction and consequently, the composition of the naturally occurring tear film is altered, which in turn, contributes to ocular disease which is generally known as “dye eye”.
While the tear film operates as a singular entity and all of the layers thereof are important, the lipid layer, which is secreted from the meibomian glands is of particular significance as it functions to slow the evaporation of the underlying layers and to lubricate the eyelid during blinking which prevents dry eye.
In response to the foregoing, various treatment modalities have been developed in order to treat the dry eye condition, including drops which are intended to replicate and replace the natural tear film, pharmaceuticals which are intended to stimulate the gland and cells providing the components of the tear film and various warm compresses and warming devices which are designed to treat meibomitis and the meibomian glands.
Eye drops such as Refresh®, Soothe® and Systane® are designed to closely replicate the naturally occurring healthy tear film. However, their use and administration is merely a treatment of symptoms and not of the underlying cause. Further, the use of drops is generally for an indefinite length of time and consequently, extended use can become burdensome and costly. Pharmaceutical modalities such as the use of tetracycline have also been suggested to treat meibomian gland dysfunction and one such treatment is disclosed in United States Patent Publication no. US2003/011426 titled “Method for Treating Meibomian Gland Disease”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,455,583 titled “Method for Treating Meibomian Gland Disease” to Pflugfelder et al. and PCT Publication No. WO 99/58131 titled “Use of Tetracyclines for Treating Meibomian Gland Disease”. However, this treatment has not proven to be clinically effective for meibomian gland obstruction, and it may be unnecessary as much meibomian gland dysfunction is the result of an obstruction of the gland without infection. The use of corticosteroids have also been proposed to treat meibomian gland dysfunction as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,607 titled “Non-preserved Topical Corticosteroid for Treatment of Dry Eye, filamentary Keratitis, and Delayed Tear Clearance (or Turnover)” to Pflugfelder et al. Again, this proposed treatment appears to treat the symptom of dry eye, as opposed to treatment of the underlying cause and further presents the risks of inducing cataracts and glaucoma. Additionally, the use of topically applied androgens or androgen analogues have also been used to treat acute dry eye signs and symptoms in Keratoconjuctivitis Sicca as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,912 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,289 both titled “Ocular Therapy in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca Using Topically Applied Androgens of TGF-β” and both issued to Sullivan.
Another modality for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction is disclosed in European Patent Application serial no. PCT/GB2003/004782 titled “Eyelid Margin Wipes Comprising Chemical Means for Temperature Adjustment”. As disclosed in this patent application, an eyelid margin wipe is provided wherein prior to use, a chemical agent is activated that will heat the wipe to about 32° C. to about 55° C. and wherein the temperature will be maintained for at least ten minutes to treat the eyelid margin. This method is not without its drawbacks in that lid irritation can be exacerbated by non-specific heating and the heating range noted as comfortable at over 50° C. would burn the skin. Another method of heating the eyelids and meibomian glands uses near infrared radiation. More specifically, two hard eye patches were attached to an eye mask according to the pupillary distance of the subject. The eye mask was held in place by an elastic headband. Each patch employed 19 light emitting diodes, emitting near infrared radiation from 850 nm to 1050 nm, with a peak at 940 nm. The device produced 10 mW/cm2 of energy operating on electrical power. Goto, E., et al., Treatment of Non-Inflamed Obstructive Meibomian Gland dysfunction by an Infrared Warm Compression Device, British Journal of Opthalmology, Vol. 86 (2002), pp. 1403-1407.
United States Patent Publication US2004/0237969 titled “Therapeutic Eye and Eye Lid Cover” comprises a pair of goggles that are adapted to deliver humid saturated air around the eyelids. This modality is also discussed in greater detail in the article titled “Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness and Ocular Comfort after Meibomian Therapy via Latent Heat with a Novel Device in Normal Subjects” by Mitra et al, published in Eye, (2004) at pages 1-4.
United States Patent Publication US2003/0233135 titled “Method and Apparatus for Preventing and Treating Eyelid Problems” by Yee attempts to clear the plugged meibomian glands by means of electrical stimulation of the muscle of Riolan which the invention presumed to aid in the expression of the meibomian gland secretion.
It will be noted that all of the above-noted treatment modalities are not without their inherent drawbacks and deficiencies. For example, the current application of heat to the meibomian glands treatment is very time consuming. Normally, treatment consists of at least fifteen minutes of heat application which is followed by manual expression, which normally consists of placing a cotton swab or firm surface behind the portion of the eye lid where the blocked meibomian gland is located and manually squeezing the obstruction from the gland, the foregoing often being quite painful despite the use of topical anesthesia provided in eye drop form.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a meibomian gland treatment that overcomes the drawbacks and deficiencies of the prior art.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a meibomian gland treatment device that is a single step treatment, thus, eliminating the need for manual expression.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a meibomian gland treatment device which treats meibomian gland disease and not merely its symptoms.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a meibomian gland treatment device that restores the natural sebum flow rather than merely attempting to replace or replicate the naturally occurring tear components.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a meibomian gland treatment device which minimizes the chance of infection.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a meibomian gland treatment device that is simple, inexpensive, and easy to use by the health care provider and the patient.
According to the present invention there is provided a method and apparatus for treating meibomian gland dysfunction wherein the flow of naturally occurring secretions from the meibomian gland is restored. The method comprises applying a regulated force, regulated energy, regulated heat and/or chemical/pharmacological agent or combinations thereof to the eyelid to remove obstruction in order to restore the natural flow of secretion from the meibomian gland. In further aspects of the invention, the obstruction may be dissolved, extracted and/or loosened from the gland wall, softened prior to extraction and/or expansion of the gland orifice or channel such that the normal secretions from the gland are restored. In other aspects of the invention the obstruction may be loosened from the gland wall or softened prior to extraction. Additionally, the force applied to loosen the obstruction may be of a pre-selected magnitude and applied for a pre-selected period of time.
The apparatus comprises means for applying an external or internal force, energy or heat (or a combination of the foregoing) to the gland to loosen the obstruction. Further aspects of the invention include providing means for softening, breaking up, and/or liquefying the obstruction prior to extraction and means for extracting the obstruction.
a is a perspective view of a system for clearing obstructed meibomian glands.
b is a broken away side view of the probe tip employed in the embodiment of
a is a perspective view of a second embodiment of the probe tip according to the present invention.
b is a broken away side view of the probe tip of
c is a broken away side view of the probe tip of
a is a side view of an alternate embodiment of the probe tip having rollers for clearing obstructed meibomian glands according to the present invention.
b is a side view of another alternate embodiment of the probe tip having rollers for clearing obstructed meibomian glands according to the present invention.
a is a schematic view of another embodiment of the apparatus for clearing meibomian glands according to the present invention.
b is an exploded view of the hand-held probe of the embodiment of
c is a side view of the hand-held probe of
a is a perspective view of another embodiment of the meibomian gland treatment apparatus in the form of the hydro-oculator according to the present invention.
b is a side view of the hydro-oculator of
c is a schematic side view of the hydro-oculator according to the present invention in place against the lower eyelid.
d is a schematic side view of the hydro-oculator according to the present invention in place against the lower eyelid and showing the fluid filled bladder beginning to expand.
e is a schematic side view of the hydro-oculator according to the present invention in place against the lower eyelid and showing the fluid filled bladder in a further expanded state.
While the present invention will be described more fully hereinafter, it is to be understood at the outset that persons of skill in the art may modify the invention herein described while still achieving the favorable results of this invention. Accordingly, the description that follows is to be understood as a broad teaching disclosure directed to persons of skill in the appropriate arts, and not as limiting upon the present invention.
Referring now to
As briefly mentioned herein above, obstruction composition will vary with the etiology which produced it. However, the obstruction will, in most cases, consist of a combination of, dead cells, keratin, bacteria, desquamated cells, sebaceous ground substance, milky fluid, inspissated or creamy secretions, or any combination of the foregoing in solid, semi-solid and thickened forms. The obstruction may be in the gland channel, at the gland orifice, atop the gland orifice or a combination of the foregoing. As employed herein, obstruction refers to any of the foregoing.
Thus, it is self-evident that any obstruction of the channel will restrict or prevent secretions from exiting the gland and further, that in order to clear such obstructions or “occlusions”, the obstruction may be loosened from the gland wall, and/or broken up, fractured, softened, or liquified so that it will fit through the gland orifice without causing excessive pain. Lastly, the obstruction remnants must be expressed from the gland. The present invention provides a method and apparatus to accomplish these tasks.
According to the method of the present invention, the obstruction P should be softened or liquefied prior to attempting extraction or expression. With respect to the foregoing, the terms “softened” or “liqified” are intended to mean a “non-solid” flowable state. In addition, in order to be clinically satisfactory, softening or liquefying of the obstruction P should be effected as quickly as possible and regulated heat treatment time should be less than five (5) minutes with one to two (1-2) minutes being preferred without causing damage to the surrounding tissues of the ocular globe or the eye, such heat treatments can be electrical, laser heating, hot water conductive heating, infrared heating, ultrasonic heating, RF heating, etc. This necessarily requires the addition of a greater amount of energy (heating) than is deliverable by the conventional application of hot compresses which according to current practice are applied for 3-15 minutes prior to the clinician attempting to remove the obstruction. Once the obstruction is softened or liquified, removal is obtained by the application of a regulated force to the gland. More specifically, it is contemplated by the present invention that the force applied be a repeatable controlled force, as more fully explained herein below.
Treatment to remove the obstruction will involve the application of an external regulated force to the eyelid and/or directly over the obstructed orifice to loosen the obstruction within the gland G and the orifice. The means for applying the force may be selected from one or more of a number of modalities wherein the frequency of vibration may be including low frequency vibration (generally less than 1000 Hz), sonic (generally 1000 Hz to 20,000 Hz) or ultrasonic energy (generally greater than 20,000 Hz), fluid jet such as air or water, microwave energy, needles, micro-needles, laser energy, RF energy, aspiration/suction, vacuum, pressure, compression and functional equivalents thereof. In addition, once a modality is chosen, the physician will have to determine the optimum treatment parameters so that each of the foregoing modalities will be applied to the eyelid such that the force (or energy, as appropriate) provided thereby is transmitted through the eyelid tissue to the obstruction. Further, the treatment intensity and length of application of these external forces will vary with the size and composition of the obstruction. Once a treatment protocol is established, the force can either be set or variable within a preselected range. Experiments were performed using an eccentric vibrating motor applied directly to the human eyelids. Bench tests of the vibration revealed the following data points, specifically setting number 3 was shown to be clinically effective to loosen the obstruction within the meibomian gland and orifice:
Once the obstruction has been loosened from the walls of the gland, it may be operated upon such that it will pass through the orifice O in a manner which causes little or no pain or discomfort to the patent. This can be accomplished by heating to soften or liquefy the obstruction up to a range of thirty seven degrees centigrade (37° C.) to fifty degrees centigrade (50° C.) with the preferred operating range being forty degrees centigrade (40° C.) to forty seven degrees centigrade (47° C.) and desired modality of forty two degrees centigrade (42° C.) to forty six degrees centigrade (46° C.) so that it easily passes through the orifice (or with minimal non-painful expansion thereof). Modalities for heating may include conduction, convection and radiation supplied by one or more of the following: thermal conduction, thermal convection, ultrasonic energy, laser energy, RF energy, direct and/or indirect transfer from heat source ad microwave energy which may be applied for a preselected period of time. By varying the amplitude, intensity and length of application, some of the foregoing modalities may also be employed to fracture or break up the obstruction. It will be noted that a closed loop feedback control system, well known to those skilled in the art (not shown) may be employed during heating to measure temperature proximate the eyelid to ensure that the obstruction does, in fact, reach a temperature sufficient to turn the obstructive material into a flowable, liquid or semi-liquid state.
Extraction of the softened, broken apart or fractured obstruction may be accomplished by one or more of the following: needles, micro-needles, aspiration/suction, vacuum, pressure and compression. One embodiment of the invention is a suction system that is placed over the gland orifice may be employed to suck out the components of the softened, loosened or liquefied obstruction or the pieces thereof, as appropriate or alternatively, to employ suction to collect the obstruction as it exits the gland orifice. In order to be clinically effective, the foregoing modalities for extracting or expressing the obstruction should be administered in a fashion that is regulated, i.e., done in a repeatable manner.
An apparatus for unplugging the obstructed gland channel C is schematically illustrated in
Turning now to
In addition to vibration alternative force, energy, aspiration and/or chemical/pharmacological agents can be used to open up the channel C. The probe may be further equipped with aspiration means 260 (best illustrated in
In another aspect of the invention, the probe 230 may be equipped with a means for heating 270 such as a solid state heating element which may be regulated to provide relatively precise amounts of energy in the previously mentioned ranges that assists in softening, liquifying or melting the obstruction P via heat transfer through the tissue when the probe is placed against the tissue.
A second embodiment of the invention (
In operation, the clinician would place the abrasive tip 310 in contact over the gland orifice creating a seal between the tip and the skin. Movement of the probe 330 would cause the abrasive 310 on the bottom of the tip to separate the cells from the skin and the aspiration, suction or vacuum would extract the cellular material from the vicinity of the gland opening. In addition, depending upon the obstruction, aspiration, suction and/or vacuum alone may be sufficient to extract the obstruction.
Additional features may also be providing to the microdermabraision tip such as a heating element 340 which could be placed in the outer covering 335 near the tip. In addition, the inner tube 320 could be equipped such that ultrasonic energy could be delivered to the obstruction as discussed herein above.
Another embodiment of the invention may employ a chemical agent to clean the gland margin and to remove or exfoliate cells from the meibomian gland orifice. For example Ophthaine® or a similar pharmacological agent may be employed to assist in removing epithelial cells from over the gland orifice. A probe similar to that shown in
A further embodiment of the invention may deliver vibrational and/or thermal energy to the obstruction P without contacting the gland. One potential energy source is laser light supplied by titanium, argon, krypton or microwave energy. Extraction of the obstruction would be accomplished by the means described herein above.
A third embodiment of the invention employs pressure applied to the tissue as shown in
In operation, the physician would place the rollers 375 in contact with the eyelid, either inside, outside or both. Lateral movement of the rollers 375 would cause pressure to be applied to the gland to remove the obstruction. Alternatively, aspiration, suction and/or vacuum could be applied to extract the obstruction and material from the vicinity of the gland opening. In addition, depending upon the obstruction, aspiration, suction and/or vacuum alone may be sufficient to extract the obstruction.
Additional features may also be provided to the rollers such as a regulated heating element (not shown) which could be placed in the outer covering near the tip as shown in
The embodiment illustrated in
Another embodiment of the invention is shown in
Another embodiment of the invention may employ a chemical agent or compound to clean the glandular margin to remove or exfoliate cells from the gland orifice. A probe similar to that shown in
A further embodiment of the invention may deliver vibrational and/or thermal energy to the obstruction P without contacting the gland. One potential energy source is laser light supplied by a titanium-sapphire, argon, krypton, RF energy or microwave energy. Extraction of the obstruction would be accomplished by the means described herein above.
Another embodiment of the invention employs the use of chemical or pharmacological agents to open or dilate the gland and gland orifice wherein the obstruction naturally is expressed and returns the normal secretions of the gland. Alternatively, the chemical or pharmaceutical agent would be used to soften or breakup the obstruction with such obstruction being expressed with the use of devices as defined above or combinations thereof. Chemical or pharmacological agents may also be used in connection with the device for post treatment. Once the glands have been opened then chemical or pharmacological agents may be used to enhance the normal production or secretion to maintain the glands in its unblocked state.
Dilation of the meibomian gland channel and orifice may also be employed to loosen or free the obstruction from the gland walls. Dilation may be accomplished by chemical, pharmacological, or mechanical means.
Stimulation of the meibomian gland may also be employed in conjunction with the other modalities discussed above to loosen or fracture the obstruction.
As mentioned herein above, the present invention has been described in detail on conjunction with the figures in connection with the meibomian glands of the eye. The reader will note that the principals of this invention may be applied with equal efficacy to the other glands of the human body and potentially to valuable domesticated farm animals to treat various ailments.
This invention is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/434,033, filed May 15, 2006 entitled “Method of Apparatus for Treating Gland Dysfunction Employing Heated Medium,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/700,233, filed Jul. 18, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and are hereby made a part of this specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1006945 | Houston | Oct 1911 | A |
1924315 | Hemphill et al. | Aug 1933 | A |
2545724 | Curtis | Mar 1951 | A |
2891252 | Lazo | Jun 1959 | A |
3140390 | Smith et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3173419 | Dubilier et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3333586 | Bellis et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3404678 | Von Ardenne | Oct 1968 | A |
3415299 | Hinman, Jr. et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3667476 | Muller | Jun 1972 | A |
3952735 | Wirtschafter et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4069084 | Mlodozeniec et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4261364 | Haddad et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4387707 | Polikoff | Jun 1983 | A |
4778457 | York | Oct 1988 | A |
4883454 | Hamburg | Nov 1989 | A |
4914088 | Glonek et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4918818 | Hsieh | Apr 1990 | A |
4955377 | Lennox et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4958632 | Duggan | Sep 1990 | A |
5030214 | Spector | Jul 1991 | A |
5097829 | Quisenberry | Mar 1992 | A |
5151100 | Abele et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5158082 | Jones | Oct 1992 | A |
5169384 | Bosniak et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5213097 | Zeindler | May 1993 | A |
5251627 | Morris | Oct 1993 | A |
5283063 | Freeman | Feb 1994 | A |
5314456 | Cohen | May 1994 | A |
5327886 | Chiu | Jul 1994 | A |
5343561 | Adamo | Sep 1994 | A |
D352106 | Fanney et al. | Nov 1994 | S |
5368582 | Bertera | Nov 1994 | A |
5368591 | Lennox et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5377701 | Fang | Jan 1995 | A |
5419772 | Teitz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425380 | Hudson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5496311 | Abele et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5601548 | Smith et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5628772 | Russell | May 1997 | A |
5643336 | Lopez-Claros | Jul 1997 | A |
5700238 | Hyson | Dec 1997 | A |
5720773 | Lopez-Claros | Feb 1998 | A |
5769806 | Radow | Jun 1998 | A |
5782857 | Machuron | Jul 1998 | A |
5807357 | Kang | Sep 1998 | A |
5836927 | Fried | Nov 1998 | A |
5893719 | Radow | Apr 1999 | A |
5958912 | Sullivan | Sep 1999 | A |
5960608 | Ohtonen | Oct 1999 | A |
5964723 | Augustine | Oct 1999 | A |
6007501 | Cabados et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024095 | Stanley, III | Feb 2000 | A |
6090060 | Radow | Jul 2000 | A |
6107289 | Sullivan | Aug 2000 | A |
6110292 | Jewett et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112900 | Adkins, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6113561 | Augustine | Sep 2000 | A |
6153607 | Pflugfelder et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155995 | Lin | Dec 2000 | A |
6181970 | Kasevich | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193740 | Rodriguez | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206842 | Tu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213966 | Augustine | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6273886 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275735 | Jarding et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309364 | Cathaud et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312397 | Gebhard | Nov 2001 | B1 |
D456079 | Fujii | Apr 2002 | S |
6423018 | Augustine | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425888 | Embleton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438398 | Pflugfelder et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6455583 | Pflugfelder et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6482203 | Paddock et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490488 | Rudie et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
D472637 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
6544257 | Nagase et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
D477084 | Menezes et al. | Jul 2003 | S |
6641264 | Schwebel | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648904 | Altshuler et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6706001 | Fresco | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6780176 | Hasegawa | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788977 | Fenn et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827898 | Fausset et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6840954 | Dietz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6860852 | Schonenberger et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6860880 | Treat et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874884 | Schwebel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882885 | Levy, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886933 | Schwebel | May 2005 | B2 |
6908195 | Fuller | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925317 | Samuels et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6974454 | Hooven | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7001379 | Behl et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004942 | Laird et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7036928 | Schwebel | May 2006 | B2 |
7069084 | Yee | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7108694 | Miura et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118591 | Frank et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122013 | Liu | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122047 | Grahn et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123968 | Casscells, III et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7211070 | Soroudi | May 2007 | B2 |
7229468 | Wong et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231922 | Davison et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
D546459 | Banryu | Jul 2007 | S |
D552736 | Yamaoka | Oct 2007 | S |
D553750 | Yamaoka | Oct 2007 | S |
7316657 | Kleinhenz et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7357500 | Schwebel | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7384405 | Rhoades | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7442174 | Butler | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7513893 | Soroudi | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7559907 | Krempel et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7594728 | Seal et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637878 | Lin | Dec 2009 | B2 |
D612941 | Youngquist et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
D614774 | Gausmann et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
7712899 | Tanassi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7976573 | Korb et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
D645565 | Smith et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
8025689 | Korb et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8128673 | Korb et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8128674 | Korb et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137390 | Korb et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8187311 | Korb et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8262715 | Wong, Jr. et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8455016 | Maskin | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8617229 | Korb et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8628504 | Grenon et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8791158 | Dalton et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8906427 | Maskin | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010039442 | Gorge et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041886 | Durkin et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020035345 | Beck | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020099094 | Anderson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111608 | Baerveldt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128696 | Pearl et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156402 | Woog et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030050594 | Zamierowski | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056281 | Hasegawa | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065277 | Covington | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073987 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100936 | Altshuler et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114426 | Pflugfelder et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139790 | Ingle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195438 | Petillo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211043 | Korb | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233135 | Yee | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040064169 | Briscoe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064171 | Briscoe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076695 | Gilbard | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111138 | Bleam et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153093 | Donovan | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199158 | Hood et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040237969 | Fuller | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249427 | Nabilsi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260209 | Ella et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050022823 | Davison et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050119629 | Soroudi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143798 | Bleam et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187502 | Krempel et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050220742 | Breen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234506 | Weser | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060018953 | Guillon et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030604 | Elsinger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055878 | Yee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069420 | Rademacher et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104914 | Soroudi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060135890 | Tsai | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136022 | Wong, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139569 | Schwebel | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154901 | Pflugfelder et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157064 | Davison et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183698 | Abelson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212101 | Cheng | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233859 | Whitcup et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016254 | Grenon et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016256 | Korb et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027411 | Ella et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049913 | Grenon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070173799 | Hsia | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203462 | Soroudi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070270760 | Dacquay et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280924 | Daniels et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282282 | Wong, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080051741 | Grenon et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075787 | Hibino | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080132973 | Lord et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200848 | Avni | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090043365 | Friedland et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090137533 | Adkins, Jr. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090192478 | Soroudi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090306111 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306607 | Yasuhiro | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100100029 | Maskin | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100292630 | Maskin | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110039805 | Pflugfelder et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110059902 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059925 | Donnenfeld | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110124725 | Maskin | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172302 | Dalton et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110203832 | Schrock | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110251532 | Yang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273550 | Amano et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110294897 | Aberg et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120003296 | Shantha et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120065556 | Smith et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120093876 | Ousler, III et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109041 | Munz | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128763 | Maskin | May 2012 | A1 |
20120209154 | Williams, III et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220612 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120321673 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130045927 | Dana et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046367 | Chen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053733 | Korb et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130065867 | Smith et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130110101 | Van Valen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131171 | Maskin | May 2013 | A1 |
20130172790 | Badawi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172829 | Badawi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140330129 | Grenon et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140378878 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005750 | Kelleher et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150038851 | Hamrah et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057701 | Kelleher et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150100001 | Bujak | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011203832 | Aug 2012 | AU |
2011302478 | Mar 2013 | AU |
2331257 | Nov 1999 | CA |
2679448 | Sep 2008 | CA |
2787114 | Jul 2011 | CA |
2809274 | Mar 2012 | CA |
2650737 | Oct 2004 | CN |
1631344 | Jun 2005 | CN |
2855388 | Jan 2007 | CN |
102204854 | Oct 2011 | CN |
101663064 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103002737 | Mar 2013 | CN |
102600008 | May 2014 | CN |
104203190 | Dec 2014 | CN |
202005011496 | Jul 2006 | DE |
1816980 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2151438 | Feb 2010 | EP |
1587468 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2523556 | Nov 2012 | EP |
0370557 | Mar 1991 | JP |
06269473 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06315499 | Nov 1994 | JP |
10085248 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11221247 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000225141 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001276113 | Oct 2001 | JP |
200278727 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2004350803 | Dec 2004 | JP |
U3112008 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005237724 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006198249 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006198249 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2010155012 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2014205069 | Oct 2014 | JP |
20120115380 | Oct 2012 | KR |
2012008110 | Oct 2012 | MX |
9810723 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9909965 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9920213 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9958131 | Nov 1999 | WO |
2004041134 | May 2004 | WO |
2006058189 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006093851 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2008024100 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008106228 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009064834 | May 2009 | WO |
2010005527 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010056848 | May 2010 | WO |
2011085385 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012036931 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012051313 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012137545 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013003594 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013003731 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013006574 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013036894 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013114127 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013126599 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013149318 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013166353 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014049841 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014158356 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014179356 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2014179795 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Korb, D. et al., “Meibomian gland therapeutic expression: quantifying the applied pressure and the limitation of resulting pain,” Eye Contact Lens, vol. 37 No. 5, Sep. 2011, pp. 298-301. |
Akyol-Salman, I. et al., “Comparison of the efficacy of topical N-acetyl-cysteine and a topical steroid-antibiotic combination therapy in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutic, vol. 28 No. 1, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 49-52. |
No Author, “TearScience's LipiFlow Multi-center Clinical Study Shows Improved Meibomian Gland Secretions and Dry Eye Symptoms,” Business Wire, Mar. 5, 2012, 2 pages. |
Unknown, “TearScience Launches Breakthrough Technology in Canada to Address the Root Cause of Evaporative Dry Eye,” Business Wire, Jun. 9, 2011, http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110609005860/en/TearScience-Launches-Breakthrough-Technology-Canada-Address-Root, 2 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,901 mailed Jun. 4, 2012, 46 pages. |
Korb, Donald R., O.D., et al., “Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Contact Lens Intolerance” Jnl American Optometric Association, vol. 51, No. 3, Mar. 1980, 9 pages (pp. 243-251). |
Korb, Donald R. et al., “Increase in Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness Following Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction” Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film and Dry Eye Syndromes: Basic Science Clinical Relevance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., vol. 350, 1994, 6 pages (pp. 293-298). |
Goto, E., et al. “Treatment of Non-Inflamed Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction by an Infrared Warm Compression Device” British Journal of Ophthalmology, BJO Online, http://www.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprintform, vol. 26, 2002, 6 pages (pp. 1402-1407). |
Olson, Mary Catherine, B.A., et al., “Increase in Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness Following Treatment with Warm Compresses in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 29(2), 2003, 6 pages. |
Mitra, M. et al., “Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness and Ocular Comfort after Meibomian Therapy via Latent Heat with a Novel Device in Normal Subjects” Eye, vol. 19, 2005, 4 pages (pp. 657-660). |
Minco “Introducing: Thermofoil Heaters” Bulletin HS-202, 9 pages. |
Foulks, Gary N. et al., “Topical Azithromycin Therapy for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Clinical Response and Lipid Alterations,” Cornea, vol. 29, No. 7, Jul. 2010, pp. 781-788. |
Butovich, Igor et al., “Meibomian Lipid Glands and the Impact of Temperature,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, No. 11, Nov. 2010, pp. 5508-5518. |
Korb, Donald R. et al., “Restoration of Meibomian Gland Functionality with Novel Thermodynamic Treatment Device—A Case Report,” Cornea, vol. 29, No. 8, Aug. 2010, pp. 930-933. |
Akyol-Salman, Ilknur et al., “Efficacy of Topical N-Acetylcysteine in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 26, No. 4, Aug. 1, 2010, pp. 329-333. |
Wang, Y. et al., “Baseline Profiles of Ocular Surface and Tear Dynamics After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With or Without Chronic GVHD-Related Dry Eye,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 45, No. 6, Jun. 2010, pp. 1077-1083. |
Korb, Donald R. et al., “Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy and Dry Eye Symptoms,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 31, No. 1, 2005, pp. 2-8. |
Foulks, Gary N., “Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: The Past, Present, and Future,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 36, No. 5, Sep. 2010, pp. 249-253. |
Blackie, Caroline A. et al., “Nonobvious Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction” Cornea, vol. 29, No. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 1333-1345. |
Haque, Reza M. et al., “Multicenter Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Azithromycin Opthalmic Solution 1% on the Signs and Symptoms of Subjects with Blepharitis,” Cornea, vol. 29, No. 8, Aug. 2010, pp. 871-877. |
Maskin, Steven L., “Intraductal Meibomian Gland Probing Relieves Symptoms of Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Cornea, vol. 29, No. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 1145-1152. |
Dausch, Eva et al., “Dry Eye Syndrome in Women's Health and Gynecology: Etiology, Pathogenesis and Current Therapeutic Strategies,” Geburtshilfe and Frauenheilkunde, vol. 70, No. 9, Jan. 1, 2010, pp. 707-711. (Abstract Only). |
Korb, Donald et al., “The Effect of Two Novel Lubricant Eye Drops on Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness in Subjects with Dry Eye Symptoms,” Optom. Vis. Sci., vol. 82, No. 7, 2005, pp. 594-601. |
Korb, Donald R. et al., “Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness as a Function of Blinking,” Cornea, vol. 13, No. 4, 1994, pp. 354-359. |
Knop, E et al., “Meibomian Glands: Part III—Dysfunction—Argument for a Discrete Disease Entity and as an Important Cause of Dry Eye,” Ophthalmologe, vol. 106, No. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 966-979. (Abstract Only). |
Knop, E. et al., “Meibomian Glands: Part IV—Functional Interactions in the Pathogenesis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD),” Ophthalmologe, vol. 106, No. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 980-987. (Abstract Only). |
Non-Final Rejection mailed Jun. 17, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,446. |
Final Rejection mailed Dec. 23, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,446. |
Advisory Action mailed Mar. 4, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,446. |
Non-Final Rejection mailed Apr. 9, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,446. |
Restriction/Election Requirement mailed Oct. 1, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,033. |
Non-Final Rejection mailed Jan. 24, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,033. |
Friedland, B., et al., “A novel thermodynamic treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction,” Current Eye Research, vol. 36, No. 2, Feb. 2011, pp. 79-87. |
Blackie, Caroline A. et al., “Recovery Time of an Optimally Secreting Meibomian Gland,” Cornea, vol. 28, No. 3, Apr. 2009, pp. 293-297. |
“New Over-the-Counter Dry Eye Drop Now Available to Help Estimated 40 Percent of Americans Who Suffer from Occasional or Chronic Dry Eye” Business Wire News Release, Published Mar. 31, 2008. |
Gupta, S. et al. “Docetaxel-induced Meibomian Duct Inflammation and Blockage Leading to Chalazion Formation” Prostate Cancer Prostatic Diseases, vol. 10, No. 4, 2007. |
Aronowicz, J D et al. “Short Term Oral Minocycline Treatment of Meibomiantis” Br. J Opthalmol, vol. 90, No. 7, Jul. 2006. |
Goto, E. et al, “Treatment of Non-Inflamed Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction by an Infrared Warm Compression Device” Br J Opthalmol, vol. 86, No. 12, Dec. 2002. |
“arGentis Licenses Third Treatment for Dry Eye Syndrome” www.businesswire.com, May 12, 2008. |
Greiner, J., “A Single LipiFlow R Thermal Pulsation System Treatment Improves Meibomian Gland Function and Reduces Dry Eye Symptoms for 9 months,” Current Eye Research, vol. 37 No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 272-278. |
Lane, S. et al., “A New System, the LipiFlow, for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Cornea, vol. 31, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 396-404. |
Finis, D. et al., “Meibom-Drusen-Dysfunktion,” Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde, vol. 229, No. 5, Mar. 2012, pp. 506-513 (Abstract translated only). |
Second Office Action for Japanese patent application 2009-525529 mailed Jun. 5, 2012, 8 pages. |
Korb, et al., “Forceful meibomian gland expression with a standardized force of 8 PSI in patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction,” Tearscience, Date Unknown, 1 page. |
Korb, et al., “Prevalence of lid wiper epitheliopathy in subjects with dry eye signs and symptoms,” Cornea, vol. 29, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 377-383. |
Korb, et al., “Restoration of meibomian gland function post Lipiflow treatment,” Tearscience, Date Unknown, 1 page. |
Willis, et al., “Meibomian gland function, lid wiper epitheliopathy, and dry eye symptoms,” Tearscience, Date Unknown, 1 page. |
McCann, L. et al., “Effect of First Line Management Therapies on Dry Eye Disease,” ARVO Annual Meeting, May 2011, pp. 3829 (Abstract only). |
Willis, et al., Meibomian gland function, lid wiper epitheliopathy, and dry eye symptoms, ARVO Annual Meeting, May 2011, pp. 3740 (Abstact only). |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,976 mailed Aug. 31, 2012, 10 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,308 mailed Aug. 31, 2012, 20 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,068 mailed Aug. 29, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,865 mailed Sep. 13, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,908 mailed Sep. 13, 2012, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for patent application 07716441.6 mailed Sep. 4, 2012, 7 pages. |
Asbell, P. et al. “The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the clinical trials subcommittee,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Mar. 2011, pp. 2065-2085. |
Foulks, G. et al., Comparative Effectiveness of Azithromycin and Doxycycline in Therapy of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, ARVO Annual Meeting, May 2011, pp. 3816 (Abstract only). |
Korb, et al., “Restoration of meibomian gland function post Lipiflow treatment,” ARVO Annual Meeting, May 2011, pp. 3818 (Abstract only). |
Maskin, S. et al., “Intraductal Meibomian Gland Probing with Adjunctive Intraductal Microtube Steriod Injection (MGPs) for Meibomian Gland Dysfuction,” ARVO Annual Meeting, May 2011, pp. 3817 (Abstract only). |
Geerling, G., et al., “The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction,” Mar. 2011, pp. 2050-2064, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, No. 4. |
Korb, Donald R. and Blackie, Caroline A., “Meibomian gland therapeutic expression: Quantifying the applied pressure and the limitation of resulting pain,” Eye and Contact Lens, Sep. 2011, pp. 298-301, vol. 37, No. 5, Philadelphia, PA. |
Holifield, Karintha and Lazzaro, Douglas R., “Case report: Spontaneous stenotrophomonas maltophilia keratitis in a diabetic patient,” Eye and Contact Lens, Sep. 2011, pp. 326-327, vol. 37, No. 5, Philadelphia PA. |
Cunniffe, M. Geraldine et al., “Topical antiglaucoma treatment with prostaglandin analogues may precipitate meibomian gland disease,” Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sep.-Oct. 2011, p. 128-129, vol. 27, No. 9, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. |
Blackie, Caroline A. et al., “Inner Eyelid Surface Temperature as a Function of Warm Compress Methodology,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 85, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 675-683. |
Kokke, K.H. et al., “Oral Omega-6 Essential Fatty Acid Treatment in Contact Lens Associated Dry Eye,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 31, No. 3, 2008, pp. 141-146. |
Korb, Donald R., Slide entitled “Inner Eyelid Surface Temperature as a Function of Warm Compress Methodology,” from presentation entitled the “Tear Film and Dry Eye States a Fertile Research Area,” University of California at Berkeley, School of Optometry, Apr. 11, 2008. 2 pages. |
Korb, Donald R. et al., Slide entitled “Inner Eyelid Surface Temperature as a Function of Warm Compress Methodology,” from presentation entitled “The Greatest Anterior Segment Disease and Contact Lens Complications Course,” AOA Meeting, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 27, 2008, 2 pages. |
Sullivan, David et al., “Do Sex Steroids Exert Sex-Specific and/or Opposite Effects on Gene Expression in Lacrimal and Meibomian Glands?” Molecular Vision, vol. 15, No. 166, Aug. 10, 2009, pp. 1553-1572. |
Paugh, Jerry R. et al., “Precorneal Residence Time of Artificial Tears Measured in Dry Eye Subjects,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 85, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 725-731. |
Lemp, Michael A. et al., “Blepharitis in the United States 2009: A Survey-Based Perspective on Prevalence and Treatment.” Ocul. Surf, vol. 7, No. 2 Suppl, Apr. 2009, pp. S1-S14. |
Matsumoto, Yukihiro et al., “The Evaluation of the Treatment Response in Obstructive Meibomian Gland Disease by In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy,” Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, vol. 247, No. 6, Jun. 2009, pp. 821-829. |
Toyos, Rolando, “Intense Pulsed Light for Dry Eye Syndrome,” Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today, Apr. 2009, pp. 1-3. |
Donnenfeld, Eric et al., “Topical Ophthalmic Cyclosporine: Pharmacology and Clinical Uses,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, No. 3, May/Jun. 2009, pp. 321-338. |
Suzuki, Tomo et al., “Estrogen and Progesterone Control of Gene Expression in the Mouse Meibomian Gland,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., vol. 49, No. 5, Apr. 2008, pp. 1797-1818. |
Vasta, Stephanie, “Aggressive Treatments Developed for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Primary Care Optometry News, Nov. 1, 2009, 3 pages. |
Unknown, “Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit,” p. 170. |
Paugh, J.R. et al., “Meibomian Therapy in Problematic Contact Lens Wear,” Entrez PubMed, Optom Vis Sci. Nov. 1990; 68(11): 803-6, 1 page. |
Tobler, David et al., “Nanotech Silver Fights Microbes in Medical Devices,” ND & DI, devicelink.com, 1 page. |
Unknown, “IFU Manual for PNT Model 1000—Rev H,” 24 pages. |
Official Action Issued May, 10 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-525529. |
Partial Translation of Japanese Patent Publication No. 2006-198249A, previously submitted in IDS dated Jan. 4, 2008. |
Partial Translation of Japanese Patent Publication No. 11-221247A, previously submitted in IDS dated Jan. 4, 2008. |
Sullivan, Benjamin D., et al., “Impact of Antiandrogen Treatment on the Fatty Acid Profile of Neutral Lipids in Human Meibomian Gland Secretions,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 85, No. 12, 2000, 8 pages. (pp. 4866-4873). |
Goto, Eiki, et al., “Tear Evaporation Dynamics in Normal Subjects and Subjects with Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 44, No. 2, Feb. 2003, 7 pages. (pp. 533-539). |
Kuscu, Naci Kemal, et al., “Tear Function Changes of Postmenopausal Women in Response to Hormone Replacement Therapy,” Maturitas 44, 63-68, 2003, 6 pages. |
Mori, Asako, et al., “Disposable Eyelid-Warming Device for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Jpn J Ophthalmol, vol. 47: 578-586, 2003, 9 pages. (pp. 578-586). |
Romero, Juan M., et al., “Conservative Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 30, No. 1, 2004, 6 pages. (pp. 14-19). |
Lemp, Michael A., et al., “The Therapeutic Role of Lipids—Managing Ocular Surface Disease,” Refractive Eyecare for Ophthalmologists, vol. 9, No. 6, Jun. 2005, 14 pages. |
Mori, A., et al., “Efficacy of the Treatment by the Disposable Eyelid Warming Instrument for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction,” Poster Presentation, Hall A, 1 page. |
Examination Report issued Oct. 17, 2012, for European Application No. 07716444.0, 5 pages. |
Examination Report issued Nov. 16, 2012, for European Application No. 06801969.4, 6 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Jan. 7, 2013, for PCT/US12/44650, 44 pages. |
Foulks, et al., “Improving awareness, identification, and management of meibomian gland dysfunction,” Ophthalmology, vol. 119, No. 10 Sup., Oct. 2012, 12 pages. |
Arita, F. et al., “Comparison of the long-term effects of various topical antiglaucoma medications on meibomian glands,” Cornea, vol. 31, No. 11, Nov. 2012, pp. 1229-1234. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,681 mailed Nov. 20, 2012, 10 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese patent application 2009-546506 mailed Sep. 4, 2012, 6 pages. |
European Search Report for patent application 06801969.4 mailed Nov. 5, 2012, 4 pages. |
Examination Report for Indian patent application 563/MUMNP/2009 mailed Oct. 31, 2012, 1 pages. |
Author Unknown, “New Breakthrough Treatment for Evaporative Dry Eye Disease Introduced by Dry Eye Specialist, Mark R. Mandel, M.D.,” PR Newswire, Dec. 11, 2012, 2 pages, Hayward, California. |
Cuevas, Miguel et al., “Correlations Among Symptoms, Signs, and Clinical Tests in Evaporative-Type Dry Eye Disease Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD),” Current Eye Research, vol. 37, No. 10, Oct. 2012, pp. 855-863. |
Suzuki, Tomo, “Meibomitis-Related Keratoconjunctivitis: Implications and Clinical Significance of Meibomian Gland Inflammation,” Cornea, vol. 31, Supplemental Issue, Nov. 2012, pp. S41-S44. |
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,681, mailed Nov. 20, 2012, 9 pages. |
Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,068, mailed Feb. 14, 2013, 10 pages. |
Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 564/MUMNP/2009, issued Jan. 30, 2013, 1 page. |
Pucker, A. et al., “Analysis of Meibum and Tear Lipids,” The Ocular Surface, vol. 10, No. 4, Oct. 2012, pp. 230-250. |
Author Unknown, Definition of Platform, Macmillan Dictionary, accessed Dec. 10, 2012, 2 pages, http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/platform. |
Author Unknown, Definition of Platform, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, accessed Dec. 10, 2012, 3 pages, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/platform. |
Author Unknown, Definition of On, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, accessed Dec. 14, 2012, 5 pages, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/on. |
Final Rejection mailed Dec. 27, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,901, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Rejection mailed Dec. 27, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,593, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Rejection mailed Jan. 4, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,600, 8 pages. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 08727830.5 issued Dec. 20, 2012, 3 pages. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 08727830.5 issued Jan. 15, 2013, 5 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,681 mailed May 3, 2013, 3 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,165 mailed Apr. 10, 2013, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,865 mailed May 23, 2013, 9 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,908 mailed May 22, 2013, 3 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,308 mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/044650 mailed Jan. 16, 2014, 41 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese patent application 201210077169.8 mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 18 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese patent application 201210077192.7 mailed Nov. 22, 2013, 12 pages. |
Liu, Ze-Yuan et al., “Treatment of dry eye caused by meibomian gland dysfunction,” International Eye Science, vol. 14, No. 2, Feb. 2014, pp. 270-272. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,033 mailed Feb. 19, 2014, 10 pages. |
Examiner's Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-544825 mailed Jan. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Examiner's Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-525537 mailed Jan. 7, 2014, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,901 mailed Feb. 3, 2014, 10 pages. |
Lu, Hui et al., “Tear film measurement by optical reflectometry technique,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 19, No. 2, Feb. 2014, 8 pages. |
English translation of Final Japanese Office Action for patent application 2009-525537 mailed Jan. 29, 2013, 4 pages. |
English translation of Final Japanese Office Action for patent application 2009-544825 mailed Jan. 29, 2013, 4 pages. |
Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 555/MUMNP/2009, issued Apr. 15, 2013, 1 page. |
Translation of Notice of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-525529 mailed May 14, 2013, 5 pages. |
Aragona, P. et al., “Towards a dynamic customised therapy for ocular surface dysfunctions,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, No. 8, Aug. 13, pp. 955-960. |
Arita, R. et al., “Topical diquafosol for patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, No. 6, Jun. 2013, pp. 725-729. |
Greiner, J., “Long-term 12-month improvement in meibomian gland function and reduced dry eye symptoms with a single thermal pulsation treatment,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 41, No. 6, Aug. 2013, pp. 524-530. |
Her, Y. et al., “Dry eye and tear film functions in patients with psoriasis,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 57, No. 4, Jul. 2013, pp. 341-346. |
Li, Li-Hu et al., “Analysis of the efficacy in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction,” International Eye Science, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2013, pp. 1495-1497. |
Tang, Qin et al., “Clinical analysis of meibomian gland dysfunction in elderly patients,” International Eye Science, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2013, pp. 1419-1423. |
Zhang et al., “Efficacy of physical therapy meibomian gland dysfunction,” International Eye Science, International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 13, No. 6, Jun. 2013, pp. 1267-1268. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,600 mailed Aug. 5, 2013, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,165 mailed Sep. 3, 2013, 10 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,976 mailed Jul. 10, 2013, 3 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,068 mailed Jul. 3, 2013, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,908 mailed Aug. 19, 2013, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,976 mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,033 mailed Aug. 12, 2011, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,033 mailed Mar. 15, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,683 mailed May 6, 2011, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,951 mailed Mar. 28, 2012, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,951 mailed Oct. 25, 2011, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,990 mailed Mar. 28, 2010, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,990 mailed Oct. 25, 2011, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,054 mailed Oct. 18, 2011, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,054 mailed May 26, 2011, 7 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,054 mailed Sep. 8, 2011, 7 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,054 mailed Mar. 12, 2010, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,183 mailed Jul. 29, 2011, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,183 mailed May 26, 2011, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,183 mailed Dec. 21, 2010, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,291 mailed May 26, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,291 mailed Jan. 10, 2011, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,291 mailed Aug. 17, 2010, 6 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,291 mailed Jun. 2, 2010, 10 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,291 mailed Mar. 30, 2010, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,291 mailed Dec. 16, 2010, 11 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,291 mailed May 19, 2009, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,646 mailed Aug. 5, 2010, 6 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,646 mailed Mar. 30, 2012, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,646 mailed Dec. 15, 2009, 11 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,646 mailed May 19, 2009, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,418 mailed May 26, 2011, 7 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,418 mailed Apr. 6, 2011, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,418 mailed Mar. 10, 2011, 21 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,418 mailed Jul. 12, 2012, 20 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,558 mailed Jun. 1, 2011, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,558 mailed Aug. 13, 2010, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,681 mailed Feb. 2, 2012, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/303,312 mailed Mar. 1, 2010, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/303,314 mailed Feb. 5, 2010, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 29/303,314 mailed Dec. 28, 2009, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/303,317 mailed Feb. 1, 2010, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 29/303,317 mailed Sep. 1, 2009, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,567 mailed May 20, 2011, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,567 mailed Aug. 16, 2011, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,576 mailed May 20, 2011, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,576 mailed Jul. 19, 2010, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,584 mailed Jul. 8, 2011, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,584 mailed Jun. 29, 2011, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,584 mailed May 27, 2011, 7 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,584 mailed Aug. 23, 2010, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,600 mailed Mar. 19, 2012, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,675 mailed Oct. 26, 2011, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,675 mailed May 10, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,683 mailed Oct. 26, 2011, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,721 mailed Nov. 30, 2011, 8 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,721 mailed Aug. 31, 2011, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,721 mailed Jun. 8, 2011, 12 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,721 mailed Jan. 5, 2011, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/344,914 mailed Mar. 7, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/344,914 mailed Jan. 12, 2011, 7 pages. |
English translation of Japanese Office Action for patent application 2009-525536 mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 6 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US07/00493 mailed Oct. 1, 2007, 1 page. |
English translation of First Office Action for Chinese patent application 200780039253.8 mailed Jul. 12, 2010, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for PCT/US2007/000525 mailed Sep. 20, 2010, 11 pages. |
English translation of Japanese Office Action for patent application 2009-544825 mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 9 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US07/00525 mailed Dec. 3, 2007, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for patent application 07716445.7 mailed Apr. 7, 2011, 9 pages. |
English translation of Japanese Office Action for patent application 2009-525537 mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US07/0050508 mailed Nov. 2, 2007, 1 page. |
English translation of Second Chinese Office Action for patent application 200880008741.7 mailed Mar. 29, 2012, 7 pages. |
English translation of First Chinese Office Action for patent application 200880008741.7 mailed Jul. 20, 2011, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Israeli patent application 199920 mailed May 22, 2011, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US08/51309 mailed May 20, 2008, 1 page. |
English translation of First Office Action for Chinese patent application 200680056181.3 mailed Jun. 12, 2010, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,976 mailed Mar. 11, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US06/32544 mailed May 12, 2008, 8 pages. |
Agnifili et al., “In vivo confocal microscopy of meibomian glands in glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, No. 3, Mar. 2013, pp. 343-349, United Kingdom. |
Khandelwal, et al., “Androgen regulation of gene expression in human meibomian gland and conjunctival epithelial cells,” Molecular Vision, vol. 18, Apr. 27, 2012, pp. 1055-1067. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,681 mailed Feb. 26, 2013, 7 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,901 mailed Mar. 11, 2013, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,068 mailed Feb. 14, 2013, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,865 mailed Mar. 4, 2013, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,908 mailed Feb. 27, 2013, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,308 mailed Mar. 19, 2013, 25 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,593 mailed Oct. 3, 2013, 21 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,901 mailed Oct. 4, 2013, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,068 mailed Nov. 12, 2013, 10 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,593 mailed Dec. 13, 2013, 3 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,593 mailed Mar. 14, 2014, 19 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese patent application 201210127347.3 mailed Jan. 15, 2014, 13 pages. |
Yoshitomi, et al., “Meibomian Gland Compressor and Cataract Surgery,” New Ophthalmology, Japan, 2001, vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 321-323. |
Second Office Action for Chinese patent application 201210077192.7 mailed May 5, 2014, 3 pages. |
Purslow, Christine, “Evaluation of the ocular tolerance of a novel eyelid-warming device used for meibomian gland dysfunction,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 36, No. 5, Elsevier Ltd., Oct. 2013, pp. 226-231. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,600 mailed Apr. 29, 2014, 9 pages. |
Advisory Action and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,901 mailed Apr. 21, 2014, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,033 mailed Jun. 2, 2014, 11 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,681 mailed Jun. 4, 2014, 7 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,914 mailed Jun. 10, 2014, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/434,033 mailed Aug. 8, 2014, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,593 mailed Jul. 7, 2014, 19 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,600 mailed Jul. 16, 2014, 3 pages. |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 07716441.6 mailed May 19, 2014, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,681, mailed Sep. 22, 2014, 9 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,593, mailed Oct. 16, 2014, 3 pages. |
Bron, Anthony J. et al., “Rethinking Dry Eye Disease: A Perspective on Clinical Implications,” The Ocular Surface, vol. 12, No. 2S, Apr. 2014, Elsevier Inc., 31 pages. |
Foulks, Gary N., “The Correlation Between the Tear Film Lipid Layer and Dry Eye Disease,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 52, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug. 2007, Elsevier Inc., pp. 369-374. |
Lin, Hui et al., “Dry eye disease: A review of diagnostic approaches and treatments,” Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 28, Issue 3, Jul.-Sep. 2014, Saudi Ophthalmological Society, pp. 173-181. |
Ozer, P.A. et al., “Eyelid nodule in a child: a chalazion or idiopathic facial aseptic granuloma?” Eye, vol. 28, No. 9, Sep. 2014, The Royal College of Ophthalmologists, pp. 1146-1147. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,600 mailed Oct. 31, 2014, 9 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201310017764.7, issued Nov. 15, 2014, 12 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210127347.3, issued Nov. 2, 2014, 7 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese patent application 201310017764.7 issued Mar. 31, 2014, 20 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese patent application 201310017761.3 issued May 6, 2014, 12 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese patent application 201210077169.8 issued May 20, 2014, 3 pages. (no translation). |
Zhang, J. et al., “A Meibomian Gland Massage Mechanism for Upper and Lower Eyelids Based on Anti-phase Rolling and Enveloping Movement,” Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation, vol. 38, No. 4, Jul. 2014, pp. 255-8, 273. |
Baumann, A. et al., “Meibomian gland dysfunction: A comparative study of modern treatments,” French Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 37, No. 4, Apr. 2014, Elsevier Masson SAS, pp. 303-312. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,901, mailed Feb. 12, 2015, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080109052 A1 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60700233 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11434033 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 11931398 | US |