As detailed in the above-referenced U.S. Provisional Patent Application (Ser. No. 60/787,502), a process (utilized by the employer of the present inventor(s)) is utilized to neck a can, such as an aluminum can, or other stress-induced plastically deformable container. That is, a process exists where a diameter of an opening is reduced in size by drawing-out or lengthening (necking) the area of the container proximate the opening.
As a can (or other container) is necked, the opening takes on a waviness in shape (instead of being level and circular). The “wavy” portion of the container is referred to as “earing” (which is a condition caused by the continuous forming or necking of the container). Typically, the smaller the openings of the can with respect to its original size, the more reductions or necking operations that are required, and the wavier the top edge of a can becomes. Typically, the waviness is not a desirable feature, and, in fact, can cause various problems with subsequent can production operations, such as, for example, edge rolling and/or threading.
The present inventors have developed a trimming device and process to remove the above-discussed earing produced during their necking process. In one embodiment of the present invention, a trimming operation utilizing a trimmer of the inventors' own design is performed following a given number of necking operations. By way of example, after a can has gone through, for example, five, six or seven necking operations, the waviness/earing are trimmed from the can and then in some embodiments, the can is then subjected to further necking after which a trimmer is again applied to the can to remove the waviness/earing that were produced from the second set of necking. While the just described scenario results in two trimming operations between the two necking operations, depending on the type of can, the can size, the type of material the can is made out of, etc., more or less trimming operations may be required.
A trimming device according to the present invention may be a separate machine or the trimming device may be one machine in a machine line. Before discussing the specifics of the trimming device according to the present invention, a brief description of a machine line according to an embodiment of the present invention will be briefly described.
In an exemplary machine line, as is detailed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/787,502 (referenced above) an article, such as an embryonic aluminum can, is first fed into a first machine to fill stations in a turret/star wheel. Each star wheel may have any number of stations to hold articles for processing or transfer. For example, a star wheel may have six, eight or ten stations to hold six, eight or ten articles, respectively. It will be recognized that the star wheel is capable of having one station to any suitable number of stations.
The article is then processed through any number of stages, one or more of which may be a necking stage, and one or more of which may be a trimming stage. When all process/forming stages are complete, the article is discharged from the machine. The machine line may be a recirculating machine line or any other type of machine line (see, e.g., U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/787,502 (referenced above)).
In one exemplary scenario, after the first set of necking operations and the first trimming operation in a trimming turret of a trimming device according to the present invention (described below in greater detail), the article (e.g., can) is recirculated by the recirculating machine back to the beginning to be subjected to further necking operations in a “second pass” (the first set of necking and trimming being done in the “first pass”), as described above. That is, after the cans are loaded in a primary end feed, the cans come into the machine that will go through the first pass tooling and be subjected to, for example, 17 reductions (the can is necked 17 times), and then the cans go up the recirculating conveyor and then come back and are loaded in the second pass pockets on the trimming turret. (In some embodiments, the cans go through exactly the same turrets, but are subjected to a different set of tooling in the turret for the second pass, as will be discussed in greater detail below.)
In some embodiments of the invention, there is a trimmer immediately at the end of the “necker” tooling which trims after the first pass, wherein the trimmer then also trims after the second pass, in the same turret. This allows for two different opening diameters to be trimmed within one trimming turret.
It is noted that in other embodiments of the trimmer invention, there is also a trimming turret after a threading turret that imparts threads onto a can, which is used to trim the can after the threads are imparted onto the can.
Various aspects of the trimmer device, which may be utilized in the line just described, will now be discussed.
In a first embodiment of the present invention, there is a trimmer head 500 as may be seen in
The trimmer head 500 also includes a trimmer pilot.
Accordingly, various size pilots may be utilized with the trimmer head 500 according to the present invention based on the size of the opening of the can in which the waviness/earing are to be removed.
As to the structure of the trimming portion (i.e., the milling portion, which herein means the trimmer head 500 irrespective of the pilot) of the trimmer head 500, in some embodiments of the present invention, the trimmer head 500 utilizes a standard milling head that may be used, for example, to “hog out” a piece of aluminum. Of course, the milling head would be sized to be compatible with the general size of the can/bottle that is being trimmed, but in some embodiments, the same milling head (albeit with the appropriate size pilots) may be utilized to trim the can/bottle after the various necking operations. That is, by way of example only, referring to the above scenario, the same milling body design that is used to trim the necked can/bottle after the first series of necking operations may be used to trim the can/bottle after the second series of necking operations, the difference in the trimmer heads 500 used in the two operations being the size of the pilot. However, in other embodiments of the present invention, a different sized milling head may be utilized as well. In some embodiments, any size milling head, along with the properly sized pilot combined with that milling head, may be utilized to practice some embodiments of the present invention, providing that the waviness/earing may be efficiently and satisfactorily removed.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the trimmer heads 500 are mounted in a trimming turret 501 of a trimming machine 505, such as that shown, by way of example only, in
In some embodiments, the trimming turret 501 may include a main shaft 510, a housing with multiple trimming spindles 515 (which in some embodiments are configured to move towards a can, thus constituting a means for directing the trimmer device to the container so that the pilot becomes located inside the opening), a housing 520 with multiple push ram assemblies 525 (which in some embodiments is a means for directing the container to the trimmer device so that the pilot becomes located inside the opening), a cam 530 to actuate the push rams, a driven gear 535 to rotate the trimming spindles 515, a vacuum manifold 540 to deliver vacuum to push plates that push the cans forward, and an air manifold 545 to pressurize the cans during trimming. In some embodiments of the trimming invention, the trimming spindles 515 include a shaft mounted to a pair of bearing, a trimmer head 500 (as shown by way of example in
Referring to
In some embodiments of the present invention, the trimmer head 500 is constantly spinning/rotating. In some embodiments, trimmer head 500 spins at a relatively high rate of rotational speed, while in other embodiments, the trimmer head rotates at a relatively low speed as compared to the higher speed. In some embodiments of the present invention, the speed of the rotation of the trimmer head 500 may be controlled. In some embodiments, there is a bull gear 535 which may be driven and rotated to adjust the rpm of the trimmer head 500. In some embodiments of the invention, this bull gear may be counter-rotated to increase the rpm speed of the trimmer head. In some embodiments of the trimmer, the speed of the trimmer head 500 is set at a high speed to produce long stringy chips from the trimmed can, while in other embodiments, the speed of the trimmer head is set to a lower speed to produce smaller chips. In some embodiments of the trimmer embodiment, the speed of the trimmer head 500 may be adjusted to control the sizes/shape and/or geometry of the chips that are produced during the trimming operation. That is, in some embodiments of the invention, the speed of the trimmer head 500 may be increased to produce a stringier chip, and in other embodiments the speed may be decreased to produce a less stringy, more discrete sized chips. In some embodiments, the invention includes a feedback loop or the like to identify whether or not the chips are acceptable, and automatically adjusts the speed accordingly. By way of example and not by limitation, the a feedback system may include a video camera or an optical system to determine/estimate the lengths of the chips, which would be in communication with a logic device that would evaluate whether or not the chip size is acceptable/optimal, and output a signal to increase or decrease the speed of the trimmer head accordingly. Again, as noted above in these embodiments, a motor may be utilized, optionally in communication with an automatic feedback system or simply under the control of a user, to control the speed of the bull gear and/or to impart a rotation onto the bull gear to change the rpm of the trimmer head, thus providing the ability to control the type of chips. The trimmer head 500 must rotate to impart a trimming action to the non-rotating can /bottle. The required speed at which the trim head rotates in conjunction with the feed rate of the can/bottle moving into the trim head (generated by the profile of the push cam 530) may vary depending on the chip shape generated by the trimming action. A convenient chip shape would be small curls that can be easily evacuated with a vacuum system as compared to long strings that could catch and tangle. Some variables that dictate the chip shape may be material type and thickness. Thus, some embodiments utilize a variable speed trim head.
Embodiments of the trimmer invention utilizing a bull gear will now be described in more detail.
With respect to
Thus, through a combination of varying motor speed and/or varying rotation of the bull gear, the speed of the trimmer head 500 may be controlled. (Again, in some embodiments, a feedback control system may be implemented to vary motor speed/rotation of the bull gear). As just detailed, trimmer head rpm control is useful because of the chip geometry that results from what is cut off the cans. The ability to control the speed of the trimmer head permits a user of the device to experiment with different chips to see which ones are easier to remove (more on this below). Also, it permits the machine to be adjusted to take into account variations in the type of metal (e.g., various types of aluminum may be used in cans) and/or sizes of cans.
In an embodiment of the trimmer invention, the trimmer turret 501 includes a vacuum 560 which helps remove the trimmed material (scrap) from the area of trimming. Particularly, this vacuum utilizes a vacuum manifold and shroud assembly 570 positioned in sufficient close proximity to the area of cutting to vacuum the chips. In further embodiments of the trimmer invention, the interior of the cans are slightly pressurized (for example, through the pilot) so as to decrease the likelihood of chips falling into the can. By way of example only and not by way of limitation, over-pressurization inside the can will “blow” air out of the top of the opening, thus entraining some or all of the chips that have a tendency to fall into the can, and blow those chips outward away from the interior of the can.
As noted above, in some embodiments, the cutter speed may be adjusted. By adjusting the cutter speed, a chip size may be produced that is conducive to being vacuumed up by the vacuum.
The movement of the can with respect to the trimming wheel will now be discussed. According to the teachings above, a vacuum push plate 735 mounted to a push ram 740 holds the can 1000. The can is then introduced at a controlled rate and distance into/towards the rotating trimmer head 500, thus allowing the rotating trimmer head to remove material from the opened edge of the can. In some embodiments of the invention, the trimmer head 500 is held stationary with respect to the axis of rotation, and the can is moved towards the head 500. The can is then retracted from the trimmer head by the vacuum push plate ram.
Given the disclosure of the present invention, one versed in the art would appreciate that there may be other embodiments and modifications within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, all modifications attainable by one versed in the art from the present disclosure within the scope and spirit of the present invention are to be included as further embodiments of the present invention. The scope of the present invention is to be defined as set forth in the following claims.
This application is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/581,787, filed Oct. 17, 2006, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/787,502, filed Mar. 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1621301 | Wright | Jan 1927 | A |
2346376 | Heavener | Aug 1942 | A |
2686551 | Laxo | Aug 1954 | A |
2928454 | Laxo | Mar 1960 | A |
3096709 | Eldred | Jul 1963 | A |
3621530 | Pflieger | Nov 1971 | A |
3983729 | Traczyk et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4030432 | Miller et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4102168 | Brookes et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4207761 | Niemi | Jun 1980 | A |
4513595 | Cvacho | Apr 1985 | A |
4697691 | Zodrow et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4892184 | Vander Griendt et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5704240 | Jordan | Jan 1998 | A |
5762174 | Risley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6050396 | Moore | Apr 2000 | A |
6055836 | Waterworth et al. | May 2000 | A |
6176006 | Milliman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199420 | Bartosch | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233993 | Irie | May 2001 | B1 |
6378695 | Rinne | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6467322 | Nogami et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6644083 | Pakker | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6672122 | Mustread et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6779651 | Linglet et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7464573 | Shortridge | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7530445 | Marshall et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20050193796 | Heiberger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070017089 | Hosoi | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070227218 | Shortridge | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070227320 | Marshall | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070227859 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249424 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251803 | Schill et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080282758 | Shortridge et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2536841 | Mar 2005 | CA |
19 39 623 | Aug 1969 | DE |
101 56 085 | May 2003 | DE |
2881123 | Jul 2006 | FR |
0 730 6 | Mar 1898 | GB |
2002-102968 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2004-130386 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-237752 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-251424 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-252321 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-320432 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-002557 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-160468 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-217305 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005-022663 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006-176140 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-176183 | Jul 2006 | JP |
WO-9412412 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO-9633032 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9737786 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9749509 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-2005023450 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2006067901 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110011147 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60787502 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11581787 | Oct 2006 | US |
Child | 12892458 | US |