The present invention relates to trimming or shearing of aluminum sheet, and more particularly relates to a method and apparatus for reducing sliver production during trimming of sheet such as aluminum autobody sheet.
Automotive manufacturers are seeking ways of replacing steel components with aluminum components in order to gain benefits such as reduced weight and improved corrosion resistance. For example, attempts have been made to replace conventional steel autobody sheet with aluminum autobody sheet.
Trimming is an important operation in the autobody sheet forming process. Such trimming operations have conventionally been used to form steel sheet having adequate edge characteristics. When trimmed with dies conventionally designed for steel sheet, aluminum autobody sheet produces unacceptable cut surfaces having slivers, burrs, surface roughness and the like. Slivers are particularly disadvantageous because they cause damage to both the tooling and surface finish of the part. In addition, slivers contaminate the production line.
Aluminum autobody sheet produces appreciable amounts of slivers during trimming operations when trimmed with dies designed for steel sheets. The slivers can be carried to downstream operations and cause damage to the surface of formed parts, resulting in increased repair rates and line downtime. Hand removal of slivers from finished aluminum sheet products is usually employed in production practice. The sliver problem is identified as one of the major factors affecting the OEMs' manufacturing cost gap between using aluminum and steel autobody sheets. As much as a 5 to 10 percent cost reduction for outer panel manufacturing can be achieved if the sliver problem can be resolved.
Another critical concern is trimmed edge burrs which can affect assembly processes and tolerances, scratch other parts in handling, and impose safety hazards in manufacturing and in service of the products. Burrs are also a source of sliver generation in down-stream processes such as hemming
U.S. Pat. No. 5,820,999 to Li et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses an aluminum trimming method which utilizes angled cut conditions. A range of cutting angles is selected such that a wide range of clearances and cutting angles can result in satisfactory cutting operations. The method opens doors for next generation tool design which will not only minimize the current sliver problem and reduce burrs but will also substantially improve the process robustness of trimming aluminum sheets. However, the angled cutting method does not readily apply to existing conventional trimming dies which are configured for zero-degree cutting.
The present invention has been developed in view of the foregoing and to remedy other deficiencies of the prior art.
An aspect of the present invention is to control the slivering of aluminum sheet during trimming processes.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a method of trimming aluminum sheet. The method includes the steps of securing an aluminum sheet on a trim die adjacent a cutting blade, providing a resilient support pad around at least a portion of a periphery of the trim die in a trimming path of the cutting blade, and moving the cutting blade along the trimming path to force the aluminum sheet against the resilient support pad and to trim the aluminum sheet.
A further aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus for reducing sliver production during trimming of aluminum sheet comprising a trim die, a cutting blade movable along a trimming path to a position adjacent a periphery of the trim die, and a resilient support pad positioned in the trimming path of the cutting blade around at least a portion of the periphery of the trim die.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a trimmed aluminum sheet substantially free of slivers produced by securing an aluminum sheet on a trim die adjacent a cutting blade, providing a resilient support pad around at least a portion of a periphery of the trim die in a trimming path of the cutting blade, and moving the cutting blade along the trimming path to force the aluminum sheet against the resilient support pad and to trim the aluminum sheet.
These and other aspects of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description.
a is a photomicrograph of a partially trimmed aluminum sheet, illustrating a substantially straight localization zone achieved through the use of a resilient support pad in accordance with the present invention.
b is a photomicrograph of a partially trimmed aluminum sheet, illustrating a curved localization zone which results when a resilient support pad is not used.
a is a photomicrograph of a trimmed aluminum sheet with minimum burr height achieved through the use of a resilient support pad in accordance with the present invention.
b is a photomicrograph of a trimmed aluminum sheet having a large burr height which results when a resilient support pad is not used.
The present invention provides advantages in comparison with conventional trimming tools.
In contrast with conventional trimming tools, the present invention utilizes a resilient support pad as part of an aluminum sheet trimming operation which substantially reduces or eliminates sliver and burr formation.
In accordance with the present invention, a resilient support pad 30 is provided adjacent the trim die 24 outside the metal sheet trim line which is defined by the cutting edge of the blade, e.g., the left side of the cutting blade 28 in
It is preferred that the height of the resilient support pad 30 be at or near the same level as the trim die 24, as shown in
The width of the resilient pad 30, in the horizontal direction shown in
The hardness of the support pad material should be selected according to the thickness or depth of the pad. Thicker pads typically require harder material. Within such thickness ranges, the resilient support pad 30 preferably has a resilience, defined by the modulus of the material, of from about 30 to about 10,000 psi, more preferably from about 100 to about 4,000 psi. Polymeric material such as a polyurethane material designated PT22-60A may be used as the resilient support pad. The PT22-60A material may have the following mechanical properties: tensile strength=2,700 psi; 100% modulus=240 psi; 300% modulus=350 psi; and ultimate elongation=600%.
As illustrated in
a, 5b, 6a and 6b are photographs of 6111-T4 aluminum autobody sheets having thicknesses of 1 mm which were trimmed with a clearance C of 5 percent and a blade sharpness of 0.001 inch edge radius. The sheets illustrated in
In accordance with the present invention, the use of a resilient support pad substantially eliminates bending stresses during the cutting process. Consequently, the cut edge is straight when a supporting pad is used, as shown in
Tests were performed at various cutting conditions. A total of 25 cutting conditions were tested. Five replicate tests were performed for each cutting condition. Table 1 documents the results for sliver generation with and without a supporting pad made of PT22-60A polymeric material. The present method and apparatus completely eliminate sliver generation for all test conditions.
Table 2 documents the burr measurements for all test conditions with and without the supporting pad. Burrs were measured by using standard metallographic techniques. Two burr locations on each sample were measured to determine an average value.
The present invention can significantly reduce sliver generation in automated trimming operations of aluminum autobody sheets. Resolving the sliver problem can appreciably reduce the manufacturing cost of aluminum autobody panels. In addition, the present method substantially reduces cut edge burrs compared with conventional trimming tool designs. Furthermore, the present method is very simple to implement in existing OEM production trimming operations
Whereas particular embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it is to be understood that various changes, additions, adaptations and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, as set forth in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2207872 | Östberg | Jul 1940 | A |
2339641 | Jensen | Jan 1944 | A |
3066554 | Hanson | Dec 1962 | A |
3215017 | Rutz | Nov 1965 | A |
3396620 | Raphael et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3398621 | Sack | Aug 1968 | A |
3791248 | Pearson | Feb 1974 | A |
3828633 | Klingen | Aug 1974 | A |
3842699 | Zyl | Oct 1974 | A |
3924504 | Kurtz | Dec 1975 | A |
4002092 | Smith et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4250784 | Bredow | Feb 1981 | A |
4305268 | Hahn | Dec 1981 | A |
4417510 | Sharp | Nov 1983 | A |
4485714 | Eriksson | Dec 1984 | A |
4569263 | Kravets | Feb 1986 | A |
4660401 | Kohama et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4787542 | Ruff et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4942798 | Taub et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5010795 | Kania | Apr 1991 | A |
5103702 | Yannazzone | Apr 1992 | A |
5195413 | Johnson | Mar 1993 | A |
5237901 | Warga, III | Aug 1993 | A |
5247862 | Haack | Sep 1993 | A |
5327806 | Houser | Jul 1994 | A |
5357831 | Michalik | Oct 1994 | A |
5365815 | Pfaff, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5390576 | Ishibashi | Feb 1995 | A |
5458717 | Kurita | Oct 1995 | A |
5702556 | Okuma et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5820999 | Li et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839343 | Michalik et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5896795 | Harhay et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5957024 | Kuwabara | Sep 1999 | A |
6308601 | Seyna et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |