The present invention relates to tube and pipe bending, and, more particularly, to setting up a tube bender.
Horizontal rotary draw bending is a commonly employed method utilizing tube bending machines for bending and shaping metal pipes and tubing. Horizontal rotary draw bending machines typically include a bend die, a pressure die, and commonly also a wiper die for restraining the subject tubing in a particular orientation during the bending operation.
Generally, the wiper die is employed for holding tubing in tension, with the aim of preventing possible wrinkling or creasing of the tube wall due to the stress encountered during the operation. Proper setting of the wiper die, the wiper die's fore and aft position and angular orientation, i.e. rake angle, with respect to a bend die, is highly important to the quality of resultant bent tubing. Traditionally, however, wiper die set-up is an iterative trial and error process, which may lead to production inefficiencies, as well as result in damage to the wiper die itself.
In view of the foregoing, a method is provided for setting up a tube bender having a bend die, a clamp die, a pressure die and a wiper die. The method includes providing a test-piece having an outer surface defined by a length and a substantially round cross-section. The method also includes arranging the bend die, the clamp die, the pressure die and the wiper die relative to each other in the tube bender, and arranging the test-piece relative to the bend die, the clamp die, the pressure die and the wiper die. The method further includes applying a force to the test-piece by the tube bender to clamp the test-piece, and determining whether the force applied to the test-piece is within a predetermined range of forces. Additionally, the method includes adjusting the arrangement of at least one of the bend die, the clamp die, the pressure die and the wiper die to apply a force to the test-piece that is within the predetermined range of forces.
The method may also include arranging a sensor relative to the outer surface, wherein the sensor is configured to sense application of a force to the test-piece. According to the method, arranging of the test-piece may include clamping the test-piece between the bend die, the clamp die, the pressure die and the wiper die. Determining whether the force applied to the test-piece is within a predetermined range of forces may be accomplished by sensing the force applied to the test-piece via a sensor arranged on the outer surface of the test-piece. Determining whether the force applied to the test-piece is within a predetermined range of forces may be further accomplished by communicating a signal representative of the sensed force to a processor. Determining whether the force applied to the test-piece is within a predetermined range of forces may be additionally accomplished by displaying the force via the processor to thereby compare the sensed force to the predetermined range of forces. Furthermore, determining whether the force applied to the test-piece is within a predetermined range of forces may be accomplished by displaying via the processor a suggested adjustment to the arrangement of at least one of the bend die, the clamp die, the pressure die and the wiper die. Displaying of the suggested adjustment via the processor may be accomplished on a monitor.
An apparatus for performing the above method in a rotary bender for bending a tube is also provided. The apparatus employs a test-piece having an outer surface defined by a fixed length and a substantially round cross-section corresponding to a cross-section of the tube. The apparatus also employs a first sensor array having at least one sensor arranged relative to the outer surface configured to sense forces applied to the test-piece via the bender. The apparatus additionally employs a second sensor array having at least one sensor arranged relative to the wiper die configured to sense the forces applied to the test-piece via the bender. Furthermore, the apparatus includes a processor in electronic communication with the first and the second sensor arrays, wherein the processor is arranged relative to the bender and configured to receive and process electronic signals representing the sensed forces. Additionally, the apparatus may include a monitor in electronic communication with the processor in order to display the sensed forces.
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the drawings in which like elements are identified with identical numerals throughout,
The bend die 12 has a largely circular shape with an outer radius R1, and is rotationally moveable with respect to an axis A. The bender 10 additionally has a circular guide surface 20 mounted on the axis A, concentrically with respect to the bend die 12. The guide surface 20 has an outer radius R2, with which it serves to position the wiper die 18 in the bender 10. The clamp die 14 mounts relative to bend die 12, and includes a replaceable block 14a and an adjustable block 14b. The clamp die 14 is configured to move concurrently with the bend die 12 during a pipe bending operation. The pressure die 16 is an adjustable component that moves together with the bend die and clamp die 14 during the pipe bending operation, as understood by those skilled in the art. The pressure die 16 typically includes a controlling mechanism (not shown) that produces a time delay, a.k.a. “boost delay”, in the movement of the pressure die with respect to the movement of the bend die 12 and clamp die 14 during the bending operation. Such boost delay is employed to prevent collision between the clamp die 14 and the pressure die 16 during the pipe bending operation.
The wiper die 18 includes a radius R2 (shown in
A pipe work-piece is typically installed in the bender 10 by being lain along line X and clamped between block 14a and block 14b of the clamp die 14. The position of the block 14a and block 14b is typically adjusted in order to align and restrain the pipe in the bender 10. In order to properly restrain and support the pipe, it is additionally clamped between the pressure die 16 and the wiper die 18, by adjusting the position of the wiper die, as well as, at times, the position of the pressure die. Once the pipe is secured in the bender 10, and the bending operation is initiated, the bend die 12 and clamp die 14 are rotated in tandem about the axis A. While the bend die 12 and clamp die 14 are rotated, the pressure die 16 presses against the wiper die 18, thereby advancing the pipe.
The commencement of motion of the pressure die 16 is delayed briefly relative to the motion of the clamp die 14, to avoid collision between the pressure die and the clamp die during the bending operation. Following the brief delay, however, the pressure die 16 is kept in motion along with the pipe in order to avoid excessive tensile loading on the outside radius of the pipe bend that may cause a rupture. While in motion, the pressure die 16 additionally exerts pressure against the wiper die 18 in order to prevent wrinkling of the pipe surface on the inside of the bend. Throughout the operation, the wiper die 18 remains stationary. Such action of the bender 10 permits the forward part of the pipe that is clamped between blocks 14a and 14b to be horizontally drawn around the perimeter of the bend die. After the bending operation is completed, the pipe is left with a generally uniform bend having its inside radius correspond to the inner radius of the bend die 12.
During the bending operation, while sliding past the wiper die 18, the work-piece exerts significant stress on the wiper die. The amount of stress experienced by the wiper die 18 is directly related to the positioning of the wiper die in the bender 10, with respect to the bend die 12, the clamp die 14, and the pressure die 16. Consequently, a service life of the wiper die 18, as well as the quality of the bent pipe is directly proportional to the positioning of the wiper die. Typically, however, proper positioning of the wiper die 18 with respect to the bend die 12, the clamp die 14, and the pressure die 16 is a trial and error process, during which the wiper die and/or the work-piece may become damaged by forces applied by the bender 10.
Accordingly, load sensors 28 (shown in
Thus, the test-piece 30 is employed to sense a force that would be applied to the work-piece during the actual work-piece processing with a particular adjustment of the bender 10. According to the embodiment, test-piece 30 is arranged or set-up in the bender 10 relative to the bend die 12, the clamp die 14, and the pressure die 16, thus being secured by the bender, and then the bender is activated to apply a force to the test-piece. The load sensors 28 sense the applied forces and communicate a signal representing such forces, either via a wired or a wireless connection 32, to an electronic processor 34 (shown in
The electronic processor is programmed to determine whether the force applied to the test-piece 30 is within a predetermined acceptable range of forces. The predetermined range of forces that is programmed into the electronic processor signifies the conditions required to generate a desired quality bent tube without inflicting damage to the work-piece or to the bending equipment. Such a range of forces is typically predetermined during design and development of the bender 10, the corresponding dies 12-18, and heuristically during test runs with representative tubing.
Accordingly, if the processor 34 determines that the sensed force is outside the predetermined acceptable range of forces, the processor displays on a monitor 36 a suggested adjustment to the positioning of at least one of the bend die 12, the clamp die 14, the pressure die 16 and the wiper die 18 in order to achieve the desired force on the test-piece 30. An operator of the bender 10 is then tasked with performing the adjustment of the appropriate dies 12-18 according to the monitor display. Following the adjustment, the test-piece may be processed by the bender 10 once again, in order to verify that the adjustment was successful. If the adjustment is verified, an actual work-piece may then be processed through the bender 10. If, on the other hand, the processor determines that the sensed force falls within the predetermined acceptable range of forces, the processor displays a message to such effect, thereby signifying that an actual work-piece may be processed through the bender 10.
Following frame 48, the method proceeds to frame 50 where it is determined by the processor 34 whether the force applied to the test-piece 30 is within the predetermined range of forces, as described above with respect to
From frame 52, the method proceeds to frame 54 where the test-piece 30 is used to verify whether the adjustment to the bender 10 has been successful. If the adjustment to the bender 10 was not successful, the method will return to frame 52 in order to repeat bender adjustment. If, on the other hand, the adjustment to the bender 10 was successful, the method may display on the monitor 36 that the bender is properly set-up, and will proceed to frame 56, where the method is completed.
If in frame 50 it is determined that the force is within the predetermined range of forces, the method may display on the monitor 36 that the bender 10 is properly set-up, and proceed directly to frame 56, where the method is completed. Following the proper set-up of the tube bender 10, an actual pipe work-piece may be processed. The method and the apparatus, therefore, enable the tube bender 10 to generate consistent, quality bent pipes and tubing without damaging or prematurely wearing out the wiper die 18.
While the best modes for carrying out the invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3661003 | Heiberger et al. | May 1972 | A |
4587832 | Illguth | May 1986 | A |
4738140 | Kempf | Apr 1988 | A |
4959984 | Trudell et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5819574 | Yogo | Oct 1998 | A |
7594417 | Ghiran et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110174035 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |